MR SIBANYONI: Your full names please?
PETRUS CASPARUS SNYDERS: (sworn states)
MR SIBANYONI: Thank you, you may be seated. Sworn in.
MR BOTHA: Thank you, Mr Chairperson. May I refer the Committee to page 315 of the bundle and further and may I request the Committee's permission to hand in the supplementary affidavit as was supplied to the Committee.
EXAMINATION BY MR BOTHA: Thank you, Mr Chairman.
Mr Snyders, I refer you to the bundle, there is a copy of your amnesty application from page 315 and further, stretching up to page 324. Do you have knowledge of the content thereof?
MR SNYDERS: Yes, that is correct.
MR BOTHA: And do you confirm the content thereof as true and correct according to your knowledge, specifically in consideration of your supplementary affidavit?
MR BOTHA: I also refer you to your supplementary affidavit of which you also have a copy before you, do you also confirm this document as true and correct?
MR SNYDERS: Yes, I confirm it.
MR BOTHA: From your amnesty application it would appear that you are one of the persons who participated in the ambush with regard to the incident which took place in Swaziland.
MR BOTHA: Could you sketch very briefly for us what your share in this matter was.
MR SNYDERS: I cannot recall the precise time, but that evening I was dropped off with my other colleagues at the place where the ambush would take place. After some course of time the vehicle which was to bring the ANC cadres in arrived, followed by the vehicle containing the ANC members. We were in our positions, from where we were to open fire and we did so. Three persons were killed. And after we had determined that these persons had been killed, we took their vehicle and pushed it over a cliff. We were then picked up by W/O Bellingan and taken back to our accommodation in Swaziland.
MR BOTHA: In your initial application it would appear that there are a number of aspects which appear to be incomplete or at least contradictory with the versions of other applicants. Could you provide a brief explanation of that for the record.
MR SNYDERS: As a result of the lengthy course of time there may be certain facts that I may have forgotten because of my involvement in various incidents. I may have placed certain persons at the scene who were not actually involved in that matter. In the meantime I've also been treated for post-traumatic stress disorder, which has contributed to the weakening of my memory.
MR BOTHA: You request that amnesty be granted to you for your conspiracy to murder, possession of arms and ammunition, possession and/or use of false documents or any other offence which may emanate from this matter, is that correct?
MR SNYDERS: Yes, that is correct.
MR BOTHA: Thank you, Chairperson, nothing further.
NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR BOTHA
MR HATTINGH: Hattingh on record, Mr Chairman, I have no questions, thank you.
MR BOOYENS: Booyens, Mr Chairman, no questions thank you.
MR CORNELIUS: Cornelius, Mr Chairman, no questions thank you.
MR ROSSOUW: Rossouw, Mr Chairman, I've got no questions.
MR NEL: Nel, Mr Chairperson, no questions.
MR VISSER: Visser, Mr Chairman, no questions, thank you.
CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR VAN HEERDEN: Van Heerden, Mr Chairman, I've got one question.
Mr Snyders, I have spotted this for the first time, the tape recording that you have referred to at the bottom of page 321 of your application, could you elaborate on that?
MR SNYDERS: Yes, Chairperson. With regard to some of the incidents, tape recordings were made by Mr de Kock, which we played back to Mr Oosthuizen once we arrived back in Pretoria, to indicate that the operation had been successfully completed.
MR VAN HEERDEN: Do you know how these tape recordings were made or by whom they were made?
MR SNYDERS: They were usually recorded by Mr de Kock himself, with a mini-cassette recorder that he had with him.
MR VAN HEERDEN: What did he record?
MR SNYDERS: From before the commencement of the attack to the completion of the attack everything would be recorded on tape.
MR VAN HEERDEN: What was the normal duration of such a recording?
MR SNYDERS: This specific incident in which I was involved, would have not have taken longer than a number of seconds, 15 to 20 seconds.
MR VAN HEERDEN: You state the Col Oosthuizen, or that you were under the impression that Col Oosthuizen wasn't very impressed with this tape recording. Why do you say that?
MR SNYDERS: That is simply my own observation. I believe that he may have thought that it could have been used as evidence later and he didn't wish for any evidence to be left behind, which would point at the incident.
MR VAN HEERDEN: Do you know why Col de Kock specifically asked you to accompany?
MR SNYDERS: He and I had been together at Police Headquarters in Pretoria before we went to Vlakplaas, and he must have felt comfortable in asking me to go with him to Col Oosthuizen's office.
MR VAN HEERDEN: Was it only you and Col de Kock who went to Police Headquarters after the incident?
MR SNYDERS: There may have been other members as well, that is where we submitted reports and claims, but I do recall that he asked me to go with him.
MR VAN HEERDEN: You say that tape recordings were made of a number of different incidents, was the physical tape ever identified after any operation and was it ever filed?
MR SNYDERS: I was not involved in any form of filing of such items, it wasn't my department of work.
MR VAN HEERDEN: Do you know where these tapes were stored?
MR VAN HEERDEN: Thank you, I then have nothing further. Thank you, Mr Chairman.
NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR VAN HEERDEN
ADV STEENKAMP: No questions, thank you Mr Chairman.
MR SIBANYONI: I've got no questions, Mr Chairperson.
ADV SANDI: No questions, thank you, Chair.
CHAIRPERSON: Mr Snyders, in your original application you seem to remember some event in some detail.
CHAIRPERSON: Are you sure that you - this isn't another incident that you were talking of here?
MR SNYDERS: No, Chairperson, some of the events of the incident were very clear in my memory.
CHAIRPERSON: You talk about tickets, air tickets being provided, so that they could fly to Jan Smuts airport.
MR SNYDERS: I believe that I may have been confused with another incident during which flight tickets were used.
CHAIRPERSON: Were you involved in an incident where people flew into Jan Smuts and were then taken to Swaziland?
MR SNYDERS: I can no longer recall such an incident.
CHAIRPERSON: Because you go on and you say how they were driven to Swaziland by Capt Moss, in a Vlakplaas vehicle. Or it's rather that he sent them to Swaziland after he met them at Jan Smuts airport.
MR SNYDERS: That is correct, Chairperson.
CHAIRPERSON: And led them to the place of the ambush.
MR SNYDERS: That is how I have recalled it, but I may be mistaken in the sense that Capt Moss was simply involved but not to the extent that he led them into the ambush.
CHAIRPERSON: And you also talk of pushing the vehicle over the edge.
CHAIRPERSON: How far did it fall?
MR SNYDERS: Not very far, a section of the vehicle still emerged from the high ground.
CHAIRPERSON: And you also say that when you returned to the place you were staying at, everybody except yourself and de Kock, went to a disco. Is that correct?
CHAIRPERSON: So all the other persons involved had a party that night.
MR SNYDERS: Well I didn't see them return, but they went out to have fun.
RE-EXAMINATION BY MR BOTHA: Only one question in re-examination if the Committee will allow me. Mr Snyders, it would appear from your application that you gave information of which you are not 100% certain of its accuracy, is there any specific reason why you gave the information as such?
MR SNYDERS: There is no reason, all the information is at it appeared in my recollection. I have given the information as I have recalled it, including the finer details. There is no reason why I should withhold anything or pretend that I don't know something.