Truth Commission Special Report
Decision - 59524

Type: AMNESTY DECISIONS
Names: NORMAN BUTHELEZI
Matter: AM0352/96 - AC/2000/226
Decision: GRANTED
URL: https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=59524&t=&tab=hearings
Original File: https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/decisions/2001/ac21243.htm
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------		
	

DECISION

Amnesty was GRANTED to the Applicant   on 8 December 2000 and it was stated that the reasons will follow later.

The Applicant gave evidence before the Committee on 1 February   2000.  His application was opposed by Mr Shane, appearing on behalf of the victims   Mr and Mrs Gianini and the illegal possession of firearms.  The offences were   committed on 24 March 1991 at or near Verwoerdburg.  The Applicant was convicted   and sentenced to 14 years imprisonment.

The Applicant stated that he resided in Kathlehong and was   a supporter of the IFP since its inception.  He formally joined the IFP in 1990   when he moved from Vryheid to Johannesburg.  At the time the political situation   was very tense.  it started off as a battle between Xhosa and Zulus - the Zulus   were seen as supporters of the IFP and had to flee from the township.  They   were attacked when they went to work in the morning and a number were killed.    A meeting was then called by Induna Jabulani Mtetwa who told them to procure   weapons for the fight.  At first they collected money to buy firearms but that   did not satisfy the requirements.  Mtetwa thereupon called the Applicant and   a few other members aside and told them that he considered them to be loyalists   and had decided to send them on a mission to get firearms from a white man near   Pretoria who owned a firm dealing in firearms.  The six loyals whom he selected   were Titus Ngobese, Jabulani Mkomo, Wilson Mtetwa, Conrad Buthelezi, Jabulani   Ngcobo and the Applicant.

Jabulani Mtetwa, the Induna, was the leader of the IFP in   the area.  He told them that they needed weapons and money to address the political   situation.  Titus Ngobese acted as driver.  The transport as well as an AK-47   and a pistol were supplied by the Induna.  They were told that Conrad Buthelezi   was previously employed by the victims and knew the vicinity and the location   of the house.

After waiting for the victims to return, they managed to   ambush them and ordered them to open the house.  Mrs Gianini, instead of taking   a key from her handbag to unlock the door, took out a pistol.  The Applicant   hit her on the forehead and they managed to get the key and entered the house.    They started to look for the safe.  They found it and ordered Mr Gianini to   open it.  They found the firearms inside the safe.  According to Applicant's   recollection they found firearms, big guns, ammunition and a pistol as well   as jewellery and money in the safe.  Everything was thrown on a sheet and wrapped   together and he carried it out of the house to the car.  They afterward founds   that they managed to get 11 firearms and a variety of ammunition.  He carried   the firearms, ammunition and money wrapped in the sheet with the help of some   others.  Some of his co-members also took clothing and shoes.

They left and immediately went to Induna Mtetwa to report.    They had six big guns and five small ones as well as jewellery and approximately   R4000 in cash.  Everything was handed to Mtetwa.  He later gave five firearms   to the Applicant to be handed over to one Peter Ndlela for distribution among   the IFP supporters.  The clothing and jewellery were to be sold to get money   in order to buy more arms and ammunition.

The driver, Titus Ngobese, was arrested the following day.    The Applicant was only arrested six months later.  Induna Mtetwa gave each of   the R200 after they handed the goods to him because he was thrilled with the   success they had.

The Applicant emphasised that   the reason why they embarked on the operation was because of the need to protect   the members of the IFP against the onslaught from the ANC and that the IFP needed   firearms for such protection.

Mrs Gianini gave evidence and stated that after the Applicant   found the handgun in her hand bag they were only interested in the safe with   the money and jewellery.  Nobody asked for any firearms.  This was, however,   contradicted by Mr Gianini in an affidavit filed by him wherein he stated:

      "All along Norman and Jabulani,   they kept asking where is the safe with the big guns and money"

The Committee found that this, to a great extent, supported   the evidence of the Applicant that they were looking for big guns and money   which they needed in their struggle against the ANC.  It is a well known fact   that the parties at war all strived at obtaining weapons to use in their struggle.

The Committee found that there was no evidence to contradict   the Applicant's testimony that the acts were associated with a political objective.    It was not suggested that the other requirements of the Act were not met.  In   the result the Committee had to GRANT amnesty to the Applicant as requested   by him.

DATED AT CAPE TOWN THIS    DAY OF                  2001.

JUDGE   S KHAMPEPE

JUDGE   N J MOTATA

ACTING   JUDGE C DE JAGER

??

/...

5

/...

5

