Truth Commission Special Report
Decision - 59543

Type: AMNESTY DECISIONS
Names: JAN ANTON NIEUWOUDT
Matter: AM3813/96
Decision: GRANTED
URL: https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=59543&t=&tab=hearings
Original File: https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/decisions/2001/ac21264.htm
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------		
	

DECISION

This is an application for amnesty   in terms of the provisions of Section 18 of the Promotion of National Unity   and Reconciliation Act, No 34 of 1995 ("the Act").

The Applicant had applied for amnesty in respect of a number   of incidents, most whereof had already been finalised by the Committee.  The   present matter is being dealt with n chambers.  Applicant's personal circumstances   and his activities as a member of the Special Forces of the erstwhile South   African Defence Force are fully canvassed in the matters already finalised and   no useful purpose would be served to repeat it herein.

Applicant submitted his original amnesty application form   on 12 December 1996, some 3 days before the first closing date for the submission   of amnesty applications.  The amnesty application form was accompanied by a   handwritten annexure which listed a number of incidents without any amplification   at all.  Applicant subsequently duly amplified the original application with   particulars relating to the incidents that formed the subject matter of the   application.  Some of the incidents listed on the handwritten annexure was never   subsequently amplified or referred to by the Applicant.  Those incidents had   accordingly not been dealt with by the Committee.  The incident forming the   subject matter of the present decision is the only one remaining of the amplified   incidents that must still be dealt with.

The present decision deals with the poisoning of an African   National Congress  ("ANC") members, one Knox Dlamini, in Swaziland   during or about the period 1988 - 1989.  Applicant held the rank of Lieutenant-Colonel   and he was the second-in-command of the terrorism section of the Directorate   of Covert Collections of the South African Defence Force at the time.  Applicant   was informed by one of his superiors that the Defence Force intended taking   action against Knox Dlamini in retaliation for operations launched by him inside   South Africa.  Dlamini was based in Swaziland and it was difficult to directly   attack him due to the prevailing circumstances in Swaziland and it was difficult   to directly attack him due to the prevailing circumstances in Swaziland.  Applicant   was accordingly ordered to investigate the possibility of poisoning Dlamini.    In execution of this order, Applicant liaised with one of the Defence Force   sources in Swaziland and made arrangements for poisoned beer to be given to   Dlamini to drink.  Applicant obtained the beer, which was a Swazi brand and   arranged for it to be poisoned by members of Special Forces.  Applicant subsequently   handed the poisoned beer to the source with instructions for the beer to be   given to Dlamini.  The source subsequently reported that Dlamini apparently   drank the beer and that he was hospitalised two days later in connection with   liver problems.  According to further reports of the source Dlamini allegedly   died soon after being discharged from hospital.  There is no evidence aliunde   or other objective circumstances corroborating the hearsay allegations of the   source nor is there any conclusive indication (if Dlamini indeed died) what   the cause of death was.  The source was remunerated, presumably on the basis   that, on his allegations, he successfully completed the operation.  In these   circumstances, it is impossible to draw any conclusions on the eventual outcome   of the operation or the course of events in Swaziland.

Having considered the matter, we are satisfied that the   Applicant was acting within the course and scope of his duties and on the orders   of his superiors.  We are, moreover, satisfied that Applicant's conduct was   directly associated with the then political conflict involving the South African   government, as supported by its security forces, and the ANC.  In the circumstances,   Applicant's conduct constitutes an act associated with a political objective   as envisaged in the Act.  Amnesty is accordingly hereby GRANTED to the Applicant   in respect of all offences directly resulting from his conduct as detailed above,   in regard to the poisoning of beer intended for Knox Dlamini, during or about   the period 1988 - 1989.

DATED AT CAPE TOWN THIS    DAY OF                2001.

??

/...

2

/...

4

