<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY HEARING</type>
	<startdate>1998-06-22</startdate>
	<location>BOKSBURG</location>
	<day>4</day>
	<names>JAN B. DE WET</names>
	<case>AM6466/97</case>
						<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=52703&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/1998/98061725_bks_boksbur3.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="1540">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker>JAN B DE WET</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>MR PRIOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, just before we continue, Mr Bracher was detained and indicated that he would be attending a bit later.  He asked me to convey that to the Committee.  Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Mr De Wet, your application for amnesty is contained in Volume 1, from page 66 to 80 and Annexure B, page 214 to 223.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Can I just interrupt you, won&#039;t you turn those things down please.  It is echoing.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Mr De Wet, in your application form on page 70, you mention the offences for which you were found guilty, and there you mentioned that you were found guilty of the explosions in Bree Street and at Jan Smuts?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>As well as the pipe bombs?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>And according to the judgment, that is not correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No, that is not correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>You were only found guilty for the Germiston attack?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.  I would just like the Committee to amend that for me please.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>But Mr de Wet you are applying for amnesty for all the explosions before 1994?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>In your application form you mentioned that you are a member of the AWB and also a member of the Ystergarde?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>What was your position in the Ystergarde?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>In the Ystergarde I was a Captain and I was also an Instructor, as well as a personal bodyguard of Mr Terreblanche who is the leader of the AWB.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Did you attend any meetings which Mr Terreblanche addressed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Most of the meetings Mr Terreblanche addressed in the Western Transvaal, I was present there because of the fact that I was a bodyguard and I had to accompany him to his meetings.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Now the time right before the election, what was the message that Mr Terreblanche, on behalf of the AWB, conveyed to the country?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>In the run up to the election it was quite evident that the ANC would take over the country and that the government would give it to the ANC, and at the meetings he said that there would be no negotiations, the only negotiation would take place through the barrel of a gun.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	At several meetings Mr Terreblanche said about the explosions and said that it would be bigger explosions, bigger bombs and I accepted that the struggle and the revolution against the ANC and the NP would be with fire weapons and with bombs.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Do I understand you correctly Mr De Wet, that you testified to what Mr Terreblanche said - are you telling the Committee that what you did, you did because you were influenced by what Mr Terreblanche said?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Otherwise you wouldn&#039;t have done it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No, I wouldn&#039;t have done it otherwise.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>During February 1994, you also attended a meeting at Lichtenburg, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>What was the message which Terreblanche conveyed there at Lichtenburg?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>After we got the freedom of the town, Mr Terreblanche as well as Constand Viljoen as well as other members of the  right-wing, they addressed a meeting and Terreblanche said there that the ANC, there would be no negotiations with the ANC and the bombs which already exploded, after that, there would be bigger explosions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Do you carry any knowledge with regards to a report which appeared in the Rapport paper and I ask the permission Mr Chairperson, to submit a report which appeared on the 6th of February 1994 in the Rapport and this I received from the Institute of Own Time History and I would just like to submit it if you will allow me.  I hope I am correct Chairperson, I think it is Exhibit G.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that would be Exhibit F.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>In the report which you have in front of you, is it the speech that you referred to?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>And in this report, it is where Mr Terreblanche said that if the demands are not met, let there be more bombs?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>You already made mention of the freedom of several towns which the AWB received and that is also stated in your amnesty application?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Then there were call up instructions in April 1994, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Did you also receive call up instructions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I did.  But the day they got together at the Trim Park, I was not able to go because of financial problems, and I could not be there.  Brigadier Leon van der Merwe was called by me and I told him that I would come later to Ventersdorp, and he said it was fine, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>And then you went to Ventersdorp?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I did go there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>When did you go to Ventersdorp?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>It was the 20th or the 21st of April Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>When you arrived in Ventersdorp, where were the people gathered at that stage?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>At that stage I did not know where the people were gathered.  I went to Brigadier Leon van der Merwe who was the Head of the Ystergarde, I went to his house and when I arrived there, I found him, Johan Smit, Jaco Nel who is also an applicant, Tiaan Potgieter, who was also a co-accused, I found them there and the next instructions were then given to me by Leon van der Merwe and Johan Smit and the instructions were that it was war and we needed a safe place for the women and children and I told them that the place where I was at that stage, was quite safe and there were also other alternative safety places and he said, send people out with me to go and have a look at the places and in the morning, there we left.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Who told you that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Brigadier Leon van der Merwe and Johan Smit.  He was a Major in the Ystergarde.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I just want to confirm, did he say the war is on?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he said the war is beginning and the AWB&#039;s Wenkommando is busy to occupy the whole of the Western Transvaal.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And that was about on the 20th?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>It was the 20th or the 21st, I am not quite sure about the date Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Why did you go to Ventersdorp?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Because I received call up instructions which said that the AWB and his Wenkommando and the Ystergade was called up to the Western Transvaal.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Was that the only reason?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No, with the run up to the election, because we suspected that there would be complete chaos with the elections, and we, the  right-wingers, made ourselves ready for a revolution.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Do I understand you correctly that the reason why you went to Ventersdorp, was to prepare yourself in Ventersdorp and to help to interrupt, interfere with the election?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="61">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="62">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Any other reason?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="63">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Later, I will give evidence, but later I also received further instructions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="64">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>You mentioned that you were not at the gathering at the Trim Park, or at the meeting there, and Leon van der Merwe informed you about what he said to the people there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="65">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson, I was told when I was at his house, that we were going to gather together, the women would move together and there would be several commando&#039;s.  I am talking about the AWB Wenkommando.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="66">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	They would gather in different places in the Western Transvaal in order to secure our people and also to disrupt the elections and to make sure it does not happen.  After a while, he also told me that at the game farm, where we would be gathered, we would receive further instructions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="67">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Did you know if there were any other commando&#039;s that gathered together except for those in Ventersdorp?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="68">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes Chairperson, as I remember correctly, there were seven areas in the Western Transvaal and there were between 200 and 400 families gathered at specific places.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="69">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Did you know which instructions those commando&#039;s had?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="70">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I did not know which instructions were given to them Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="71">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>The women and children, they went to your farm in Ottosdal?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="72">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="73">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Where did the men go?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="74">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>After the women and the children and the people from Ventersdorp, after they arrived there - I am talking about the Ystergarde, we were called together and Johan Smit and Abe Fourie told us that we would move from there to another place.  I knew where this place was, but some of the other people did not know that we were go to the game farm.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="75">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	From there, after we sorted out the vehicles, we left some of the vehicles for the women and we took vehicles for ourselves and from there, we went to Ventersdorp.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="76">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Can we just determine a day Mr De Wet, because there are sometimes problems with dates.  When did you go to the game farm?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="77">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>It was Friday, the 22nd.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="78">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>That is the Friday before the election?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="79">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, the 22nd.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="80">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>At the game farm, did you have any obligations or tasks?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="81">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>We arrived there quite late the Friday evening, it was more early morning Saturday.  Most of us went to bed.  There were some people who did guard duties, they were already there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="82">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	The next morning Johan Smit and Abe Fourie called us together and we were told that the purpose why we were there, was to protect this area, to do patrols and to do guard duties.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="83">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>The Saturday night, that is the 23rd, there was a meeting held for some of the members there at the game farm?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="84">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="85">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Were you involve?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="86">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I was involved at the meeting.  Commandant Dupie was there as well as Jannie Kruger, who was a Lieutenant in the Garde.  He stood at a chalk board, a black board, and there were certain sketches on this board.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="87">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	The purpose of this meeting was to go and steal vehicles.  We were told about where the garages are where the vehicles were and we were told to do certain things.  Jannie and Dupie told us about the area, the environment, we didn&#039;t know it well.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="88">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Jannie Kruger came from Klerksdorp and the area in Klerksdorp where the vehicles were, he explained this to us, this area.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="89">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>What were you supposed to do with these vehicles?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="90">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>These vehicles would be used for the struggle which was laying ahead.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="91">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Did you go and steal vehicles?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="92">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>We were on our way there, but along the way some of the vehicles we were driving in, came problems and in the end the vehicle theft expedition did not succeed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="93">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>The Sunday, the 24th of April, where were you then?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="94">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Sunday the 24th, I was still on the game farm.  I did guard duty.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="95">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>According to your application, Koper Myburgh arrived there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="96">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That was the Sunday evening, let&#039;s say late afternoon to the evening, he arrived there.  There was another meeting.  It was Gen Prinsloo, Brigadier Leon van der Merwe, Johan Smit, Abe Fourie and Commandant Dupie.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="97">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Our usual members who were there, were not allowed in this meeting.  Later the evening, after the meeting finished, I was called into this meeting and Nico Prinsloo asked me if I would go with Koper Myburgh to Koesterfontein on the farm, to go with him to his farm, to go and pick up certain items there and I said that was fine, I will do that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="98">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Yes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="99">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I went with Koper Myburgh, we went to his father&#039;s farm.  There I saw Clifton Barnard, Ettiene le Roux, Johan Vlok, who is also an applicant here, and Koekemoer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="100">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	They were busy in a little building.  There was a gas bottle on the table and around the gas bottle, they were busy sticking together explosives.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="101">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Did you know what they were busy doing?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="102">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I immediately realised at that stage, that it is them who caused the bomb explosion in Johannesburg.  We did not talk about it though, because at that stage I did not know what to say to them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="103">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I received duty to do certain things at Koesterfontein.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="104">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Then you already knew that the bomb exploded in Johannesburg?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="105">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="106">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>And what were you supposed to go and pick up there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="107">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>When we arrived at the farm, there were a lot of pipe bombs which were wrapped in canvass, which was in the little room, and Koper Myburgh asked me to place this into the vehicle.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="108">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I put a little bit of canvass in the boot of my car, and I placed the pipe bombs on top of that, as well as a 25 litre can of milk, which his mother gave us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="109">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Where did you take these pipe bombs?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="110">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>It was taken to the game farm.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="111">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>There was a meeting according to the evidence in front of this Committee, on the Sunday evening, on the game farm.  Where you present then?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="112">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I was not present at the meeting, but later Major Johan Smit called us together.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="113">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Yes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="114">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>When Major Smit called us together, we went outside and Koper Myburgh, outside now, demonstrated a short pipe bomb to us, how it worked.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="115">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>How did he demonstrate it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="116">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Sorry?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="117">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>How did he demonstrate it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="118">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>He took it out, he told them what it was, a pipe bomb and he told them how to ignite it and then once you have ignited it, you&#039;ve got three minutes to get away from this pipe bomb, otherwise you will kill yourself.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="119">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>That evening, were you tasked to do certain duties?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="120">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>When I got back from Koesterfontein, I went to General Prinsloo because Clifton Barnard, when I was on the farm, he asked me to go and hear from Prinsloo what happened about the vehicles he would have supplied us with.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="121">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	On Koesterfontein I told Barnard that the vehicle expedition was not successful, so I don&#039;t think he would get vehicles at that stage.  But I still conveyed the instruction that I received, still went to Prinsloo to ask him if there is a vehicle and if there wasn&#039;t a vehicle available, I would make mine available.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="122">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Did you know why he needed a vehicle?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="123">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>At that stage I didn&#039;t know why the vehicle was needed.  Then I went to Nico Prinsloo on the game farm and I told him what Barnard asked me to ask him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="124">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	He said, you know there aren&#039;t any vehicles and I said well, I will make my vehicle available, considering that you need one that you can put a trailer onto, but on one condition.  He asked me what the condition was and I said I want to be the driver of my car.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="125">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>So you were specifically asked to find a vehicle where you can hook something onto?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="126">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="127">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>And then what happened?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="128">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>General Prinsloo then asked me if I would make my vehicle available the next morning, and I said yes, I would do that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="129">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Outside where the pipe bomb demonstrations took place, little groups were called out.  First they wanted drivers with vehicles which would have been available for the missions and people were told that two people will go with that vehicle, two people would go with that vehicle.  They also asked me if I would make my vehicle available, that was Commandant Dupie and Koper that asked me this, Koper Myburgh.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="130">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I said that I have already had another duty to perform.  I cannot give them my vehicle for the pipe bomb mission.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="131">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Did you know that the vehicles, these little groups which were called together, did you know that they were going out with pipe bombs?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="132">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I knew that.  They were pertinently told that, that they would go out on pipe bomb missions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="133">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Did you know where they were going?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="134">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="135">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>What happened further?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="136">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Then I went to bed.  Some of the groups&#039; duties, this is Dupie and Myburgh who told them this, they brought them apart and said something to them, but I don&#039;t know what they were told, I went to bed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="137">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Early the Monday morning, Dupie woke me up and told me it is time to go.  Me and Dupie then left for Koesterfontein.  On the way to Koesterfontein, I stopped at the garage, I think it was Sasol, I threw gas into my car and from there, we went to Koesterfontein.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="138">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	At Koesterfontein, once we arrived there, I&#039;ve got a yellow Toyota car with a trailer at the back, and it was in the path towards Koesterfontein&#039;s house, and there were people busy.  The people who were busy with this trailer was Ettiene le Roux, Clifton Barnard and Koekemoer and Johan Vlok.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="139">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Cliff Barnard called us together and told us okay, the trailer must be hooked onto my vehicle and that it is a trailer bomb which must go to Germiston.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="140">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>And when you received the instruction, why did you adhere to it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="141">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>We were in a war and the election had to be stopped at all costs.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="142">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Did you know where this bomb was going?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="143">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That was the morning, early that morning Barnard told us that this bomb is going to Germiston.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="144">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Did you know to what specific place this was going?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="145">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No, they did not say the specific place.  They said a vehicle must drive in front and the vehicle driving in front, would indicate where this bomb must be exploded.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="146">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Who had the task of detonating this bomb?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="147">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Johan Vlok who was with me, he had the duty to detonate the bomb.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="148">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Was there any changes made to your car regarding this bomb?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="149">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Koekemoer, the way I built that bomb and earlier that evening, I saw how they built it, that two wires from the trailer would be extended up into my car and that at this place, they have to detonate this bomb.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="150">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Meaning that you, yourself, would do it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="151">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, at that stage, I was willing to give my life for God, country.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="152">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Who then all left for Germiston?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="153">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>The vehicle who drove in front, we called it a guide vehicle, or the ghost vehicle, it was Johan du Plessis and my vehicle, the second vehicle which had the bomb, it was me and Johan Vlok.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="154">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Was there any arrangements made of what the vehicle in front would do?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="155">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>In both of the vehicles there were Defence Force radio&#039;s and the command on the radio would be that the vehicle in front would guide us on the road, and if there is a road block, they would warn us and if possible, we could turn around.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="156">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	In the area where the, the radio&#039;s did not work in this area where we drove, we drove a bit slower and we drove very close to each other up to where we left the bomb.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="157">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You said that you were willing to give your life for God, your volk and your country?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="158">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="159">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What country is this, or father land?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="160">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>At that stage I believed that it was the Volkstaat that would be established in the Western Transvaal and that the Boere Republics would be established there and that we would get it back in the election.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="161">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What nation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="162">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>The Afrikaner nation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="163">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>You then went to Germiston?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="164">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  Germiston itself, I did not know very well.  When we arrived there, the vehicle in front stopped and gave us a signal.  At that stage, I did not realise that the bomb must be dropped there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="165">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I continued following and they immediately stopped.  Johan Vlok told me that I must drop the bomb off here.  The vehicle in front drove on, turned off in a side street.  When I got out of my vehicle to unhook the trailer, I saw taxi minibuses and I saw that it was a double lane, the taxi&#039;s came from the front, and people got out.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="166">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	At that stage I told Vlok we cannot detonate the bomb now, we have to wait because with my vehicle, we cannot turn around.  If we make a U-turn, the streets were too narrow.  One of the minibuses continued. </text>
		</line>
		<line number="167">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	At that stage I also continued, because for me it was not the right time to detonate the bomb.  We carried on in the same road or in the same lane, we saw that there was a parking spot that was open.  We drove around the block, it was on the wrong side of the road, where the parking lot was open.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="168">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I drove around the block to get into the right lane.  Vlok and myself got out, we unhooked this trailer and pushed it into this parking lot.  It was his task to detonate the bomb.  I got into the vehicle and waited for him to get in.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="169">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	When he got into my vehicle, we drove on.  We stopped at the traffic light, the second traffic light was red and when we stopped there, the bomb exploded and from there, I went back to Koesterfontein.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="170">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>What did you do at Koesterfontein?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="171">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>At Koesterfontein, I had to report back to Barnard then, Barnard and Koekemoer.  When we arrived there, I cannot remember, I do not think that there was anybody else, they were not there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="172">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	From there, we went to the game farm.  At the game farm, we found them where they were all together.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="173">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>The following day, that is now the Tuesday, the 26th of April, where did you go then?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="174">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That evening, when we saw over the news some of the pipe bomb missions haven&#039;t returned yet, and they said we have to move from our position.  General Nico and Leon van der Merwe said or asked me if I knew where the shooting range in Rustenburg was and I said yes, I knew.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="175">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	They said that we will meet there together, the next morning.  The Tuesday morning very early, when we got up, the pipe bomb mission from Pretoria had not returned yet and through General Nico Prinsloo and I was given a task to drive in front because it was a red vehicle, because I saw on the news that there was a red vehicle at the Germiston bombing.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="176">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Why did you have to drive in front?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="177">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>They were afraid that if I drive with the convoy, that they would identify my vehicle.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="178">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>At the shooting range, did you receive any instructions there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="179">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>At the shooting range, when we arrived there, we were the first to arrive, but an hour later, a convoy arrived systematically which Nico Prinsloo and Leon called me and they told me that I must remove the tow bar from my vehicle.  I asked them why, it is a red vehicle.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="180">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	They said if there is not a tow bar, it would not be so obvious or suspicious.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="181">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>So as I understand your evidence correct, Nico Prinsloo and Leon van der Merwe, did know about the mission you were on?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="182">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="183">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Did you talk about this with them?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="184">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No, I did not discuss it with them, but they did know about it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="185">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>At the shooting range, evidence was already given to this Committee, certain people that was Tuesday evening, the 26th of April, went to their wives where they lived or stayed at your farm?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="186">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="187">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Did you go with?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="188">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>After I took the tow bar from my vehicle, Commandant asked me to go with to the game farm.  The reason why he asked me was - at that stage I didn&#039;t want to go to the wives - the reason was that if there were problems where the wives were and they would move to another area, I did know where they were going if they would move and then I could probably show them which was the shortest way to get there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="189">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Apart from being uncomfortable for the women at Cliff Barnard&#039;s farm, why did they go and stay at your farm?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="190">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>There was enough facilities for them and because it was told that we were in a war situation now.  That the wives must be in a secure place and 20 kilometres from where the wives where, there was 400 AWB people gathered together with their families.  They were armed, and they had radio communication with each other if problems would arise.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="191">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Did they know that the wives were on this farm?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="192">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="193">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>From the shooting range, did you then leave the Tuesday evening?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="194">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, we left to Ottosdal where the farm was.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="195">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>And Wednesday, the day of the election, 27th of April?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="196">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>The day of the election, we went back to Ventersdorp.  The reason why we went to Ventersdorp was that two of the men that went with us, their wives in the meantime, they did not want to be part of the group of women who was together there and they went to Ventersdorp to go back to their homes, or Johannesburg where they lived.  They did not want to be part of the struggle any more.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="197">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	In order for them to get to their wives, we went to Ventersdorp.  We went round to the AWB Head Office.  Fourie and myself went to Terreblanche where he was busy in the office, he was on the phone.  After Mr Terreblanche finished with his phone call, he told us that early in the morning Nico Prinsloo and Leon van der Merwe and people in Pretoria, were also arrested for the bomb plantings.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="198">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	He then told us that we must go back to the shooting range and tell the people there that if we are arrested, that we must make no statements and that we must make use of our right, to keep quiet.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="199">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Did you then go to the shooting range?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="200">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, from there we went to the shooting range.  On the way Abe Fourie, I asked him to go along to one farm, there were certain things that I wanted to pick up there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="201">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	We stopped at the farm, just before we drove into the farm, a vehicle came from Rustenburg, it flashed its lights and said that we must not go to the shooting range, they are busy arresting the people at the shooting range.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="202">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>You did not then go back?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="203">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No, we did not.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="204">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>And you were arrested later?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="205">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, three to four months later I was arrested in Ottosdal.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="206">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>This whole operation that took place, under whose command was this whole gathering?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="207">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I believe the AWB leader, Terreblanche, the General Staff because at various areas in the Western Transvaal, AWB Commanders came together with different Generals, who were tasked for this mission.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="208">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Specifically at this game farm, where you were, was there any General that was in command?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="209">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>At the game farm, Nico Prinsloo was the Commanding Officer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="210">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>The place where you left the bomb, was this indicated to you where to leave this bomb?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="211">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="212">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Did you discuss beforehand that there would be a specific target?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="213">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>There were no specific targets indicated to us.  It was general public in the area.  If there were white people, black people, AWB people, CP people, it didn&#039;t matter who were killed in this bomb planting.  We didn&#039;t have a specific task to say, to target a specific group of people, it was in order to disrupt the election, to prevent the people from taking part in the election.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="214">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr De Wet, the chances that a member of the AWB would die in that situation was very slim,  because at that stage your plans were that everybody would be gathered in Ventersdorp?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="215">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>My vehicle with the bomb, I had the risk that I would lose my life.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="216">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I understand, but general members of the public, it wouldn&#039;t be a big chance that there would be an AWB members, because everybody was in Ventersdorp?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="217">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I believe at that stage, there were some AWB people who were not willing to give everything up and move to the Volkstaat.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="218">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Mr De Wet, evidence was given by Mr Fourie that he sold everything, he left his job in order to move up to the Western Transvaal.  What was your situation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="219">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Myself, the place where I worked at a mine and with the Affirmative Action, it was told to me that I was one of the people who had to leave because also of my right wing activities.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="220">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I then took a package and I went to Ventersdorp where at the Head Office of the AWB, I started a guard section in order to protect Eugene Terreblanche and his family.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="221">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Was this before the election?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="222">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it was before the election.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="223">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Do you know if Mr Terreblanche ever mentioned the revolution that will begin?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="224">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>It was general knowledge that there is a revolution on its way and in his meeting and speeches, he said that revolution will take place.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="225">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Did he personally talk to you about this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="226">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, at one stage we went to a meeting, I protected him, where Constand Viljoen and some of the Generals attended.  On the way back to Ventersdorp, it was in Pretoria, on the way back to Ventersdorp he mentioned that Constand Viljoen told him that with the war that is coming, he will appoint the cities to Eugene Terreblanche.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="227">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>What did you understand regarding this appointment to Eugene Terreblanche?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="228">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>In January/February we went to the Skilpad Hall in Pretoria where Viljoen and some of the other Generals and right wing leaders were together.  It was said that we will not negotiate with the National Party or the ANC/SACP alliance, that we will fight this war.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="229">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	And then I concluded that because it was war talk at every single meeting, that Mr Terreblanche&#039;s Wenkommando will use the cities to make war.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="230">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>How many people would that be in the Wenkommando?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="231">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Sir, at that stage as far as I know, there were more than 40 000 AWB members in the Western Transvaal.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="232">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I am talking about these people who would fight in the war?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="233">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>In total the AWB and the right wing spectrum, it was more than a million people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="234">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Is that what Terreblanche said to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="235">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is what Constand Viljoen and Terreblanche said in their speeches regarding the membership.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="236">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Was that the truth?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="237">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I believed that it was the truth.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="238">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And now?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="239">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Today I know that we were only a small group that were misled.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="240">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text>This war talk that you had heard, wasn&#039;t the revolution supposed to start once the ANC took over, wasn&#039;t that what your leaders were saying to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="241">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>We were already within a revolution since the National Party started to negotiate with the ANC with a one man, one vote.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="242">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	But the revolution would begin the day when the ANC takes over.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="243">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What was wrong with the one man, one vote, idea?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="244">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Sir, because I believed in a Volkstaat ideal that when the ANC takes over, they will not look after my interests.  They want us to unite, that the culture which you support, must be mixed now and I don&#039;t want my culture and religion to mix with others.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="245">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Religion as well?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="246">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, religion as well.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="247">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text>You see, my problem is that the ANC had not taken over yet when you offered your car and when you went out on this particular mission, so where does your action on that day, fit into the call up to start this revolution once the ANC took over?  What was your understanding?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="248">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, what I understood regarding this was that we already thought that the revolution against the National Party and the ANC/SACP alliance with certain speeches by the ANC that they will not give us a Volkstaat and the ANC leaders said Kill the Boer, Kill the Farmer.  We were already in a revolution and in a war struggle with the ANC.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="249">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	It was not specifically targeted, or we did not specifically say that we were going to start today, it was a thing that had a long period of time, it came over a long period of time and because the ANC said we will not receive the Volkstaat.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="250">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>According to the question asked by the panel member, you said that the revolution already started.  Do you carry any knowledge with regards to any bombs which exploded before the explosions which were triggered by your members?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="251">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.  In the Western Transvaal, and this already happened in 1993, there were bomb explosions in several places in the Western Transvaal, Free State and Mr Terreblanche said that he spoke to the National Party at meetings, that if they do not want to listen, he will plant another bomb the next day, tomorrow or the day after, a bomb did explode.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="252">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>The bombs you were talking about, did you know which group, which group was responsible for those bombs?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="253">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I knew it was AWB members who were responsible, people who were involved with the AWB, it is them who planted the bombs.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="254">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did the AWB by means of Terreblanche or someone else, did they admit that those bombs were detonated by the AWB or on behalf of the AWB?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="255">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson, Terreblanche himself did not admit it, but at a meeting he said tomorrow another meeting would explode if they do not want to listen.  So I accepted that it carried his approval.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="256">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>That bothers me - the people, how would they have received the message if they did not know who was responsible for the bombings?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="257">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, every time when there was a group of people that were involved in bomb explosions, there was a splinter group, I don&#039;t know how to call it any other way, which worked under a (indistinct) name of the AWB.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="258">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Think of the bomb explosion in Johannesburg, that was the BKA who accepted responsibility for it.  In Rustenburg in 1992 and 1993, there was also another bomb explosion which was The Boere Ordevolk people said they were responsible for it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="259">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	At that stage it was people who were directly involved with the AWB and for me, it was the standard that as soon as there was a certain little group who do things within the AWB, they do not use the AWB&#039;s name, but they use, they are part of the AWB.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="260">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But I still do not understand, at that stage you were advised to prepare yourself for a revolution and you believe in this, because certain people in leadership positions, said certain things.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="261">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	In meetings of the AWB it is accepted that these bombs, were exploded by the AWB because they wanted this Volkstaat.  But how would the Nationalists at that stage, how would they have known that this bomb was exploded by the AWB because they wanted a Volkstaat?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="262">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, according to Mr Terreblanche&#039;s utterances, and I am going to try and remember his words when he said if they do not want to listen, tomorrow there will be another bomb.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="263">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Because of what he said there, I accepted that it was his way of conveying it to the National Party.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="264">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>How would the Nationalists have found out about it?  Everybody knows that the AWB&#039;s meetings were not the greatest meetings in this country?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="265">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Because of the fact that right-wingers were involved in the explosions, the right wing organisations or splinter groups which accepted responsibility for it, because of that, I assumed that the National Party  would understand it as a right wing resistance.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="266">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And all these splinter groups, did they have one thing in common, one cause and that is to get the Volkstaat?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="267">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="268">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>You spoke about splinter groups as you called it, which took responsibility for what happened, can you be a bit more specific with regard to the bombs that we are dealing with here in this trial?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="269">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Which groups accepted responsibility for which bombs?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="270">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, the Bree Street, Johannesburg explosion, the first news report which came on TV was that the SACP took responsibility for it and that is facts that came from the news, from the TV news.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="271">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	With the second report, the SACP distanced themselves from the bombs and then it was said that the BKA took responsibility for it.  At that stage, all I knew of the BKA was that Constand Viljoen was at one stage part of that group.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="272">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>When you talk about the SACP, do you mean the Conservative Party or the Communist Party?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="273">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No, the Communist Party Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="274">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>And except for the Bree Street bomb where the report said that the BKA took responsibility for it, was there any other groups which you can specifically mention, who took responsibility?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="275">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>It was the only one that was made known on the news.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="276">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>How did you regard the BKA?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="277">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>What I know about the BKA is that it was Mr Viljoen, Terreblanche, Ferdi Hartzenberg, the Mine Workers&#039; Union and the Agricultural Unions, it was a group of 12 members.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="278">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Was it leaders - were they leaders or was it only them?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="279">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No, it was only the leadership of the splinter group which served under the Freedom Front or operated under the Freedom Front and the AWB.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="280">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>You were asked about how the message would be conveyed to the National Party, but if you look at Exhibit F where the speech was made, where you were present, in the second paragraph, in a meeting where they received the Freedom of Lichtenburg, Mr Terreblanche referred to the bomb explosions in the Western Transvaal, Free State and said that they would increase if Afrikaners do not receive their Volkstaat.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="281">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Is that how you remember the speech and how it took place?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="282">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson, and because of these utterance, we accepted that it was a basic instruction for us and for the groups who took part in the revolution, that there will be a war.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="283">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>If you listen to such a speech and it is taken up by the media, then it is quite evident, if you look at this report now, that the AWB was involved?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="284">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="285">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Is that how you understand it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="286">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is how I see it, that is how I understand it Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="287">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>I want to take you back, you also said that Terreblanche said the AWB is responsible for the cities.  Why on the game farm at Magaliesburg, why did you gather there, do you know?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="288">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I cannot say exactly why, but at that stage, we were informed that the game farm is very close to the Volkstaat&#039;s boundaries and to operate from there, and I am using the English expression, it is a hit and run.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="289">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	You can go from there, complete your mission and return and it was a very appropriate place.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="290">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>So, it is close to the cities?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="291">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it is close to the cities.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="292">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>This hit and run, you are aware of the AWB&#039;s policy which you will find in a little book which was published and was given out by Oelofse and in the first phase, he talks about the first phase.  Did you study this booklet before you joined the Ystergarde?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="293">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="294">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>And what was the view of the AWB as it is set out in this specific book with regards to guerrilla warfare?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="295">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>It was said that the AWB associates himself with that and that these actions would meet their approval.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="296">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I also received training in order to do these things.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="297">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>What do you understand when we talk about guerrilla warfare?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="298">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Guerrilla warfare implies, if you look at the border, we went from South Africa to Angola.  For us it was no longer a border war, but a city war, so I was stationed at a place and I go from there, and I make war and I return where I received my protection.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="299">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>And you do this in small groups?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="300">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, we do it in small groups.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="301">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>You mentioned that the BKA, &quot;Boere Krisis Aksie&quot; took responsibility for the bomb in Bree Street, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="302">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="303">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Were you present on the game farm when certain people from Natal arrived and Johan Smit welcomed them?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="304">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I was not present when they arrived there, I think when they arrived I was busy with my mission to Germiston.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="305">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>During your trial in the High Court in Johannesburg, you gave evidence that Johan Smit told the Natalians that the BKA took responsibility for the bomb.  Can you remember that evidence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="306">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I can.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="307">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Mr De Wet, you gave evidence in your trial, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="308">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="309">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Were you speaking the truth?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="310">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson, in the Supreme Court of South Africa I lied.  The reason I lied, was to prove my innocence in that matter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="311">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>When you left on the day of the election, were you on the run?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="312">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="313">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You are accused?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="314">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I beg your pardon?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="315">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You are guilty?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="316">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I am.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="317">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I am not talking about the findings, but in reality are you guilty?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="318">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>In reality I am guilty.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="319">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>How did you want to prove your innocence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="320">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>By telling certain lies and getting witnesses to come and say that I wasn&#039;t involved.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="321">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Mr De Wet, you are now applying for amnesty for all the explosions, why?  You were not involved in all the explosions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="322">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I apply because I was involved with a group of people who were involved in a revolution and who went out to commit acts of terror in order to stop the elections and to create chaos.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="323">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	That is why I am applying for amnesty, I associate myself with them and I was part of the group of people who did that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="324">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>And you also took the pipe bombs to the game farm, and you knew these missions were going to take place?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="325">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="326">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>When you left the shooting range the Tuesday, did you know that other bombs were going out?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="327">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, we were told that the war would take place until we have reached our ideal, which is the Volkstaat, so I accepted that there would be further bomb explosions and also that we were going to commit ourselves to an armed struggle.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="328">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Once you started running, did you learn about the explosion at the Jan Smuts airport?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="329">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>The morning when we were at the Head Office of the AWB, Mr Terreblanche said that there was a report on the radio that a bomb exploded at Jan Smuts.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="330">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>What did you think then?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="331">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I suspected that it was the people who were at the shooting range, it was one of their missions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="332">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text>Eugene Terreblanche said a bomb had exploded, or one of your bombs, as in associating himself with the action, can you just clarify that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="333">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, Mr Terreblanche said a bomb exploded at Jan Smuts.  He did not say that it was a bomb that we were involved in.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="334">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	He only said a bomb exploded.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="335">
			<speaker>MR MALAN</speaker>
			<text>Can I just follow up on that, when he said a bomb, you said that you suspected, but did you not in reality know that it was one of your bombs?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="336">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, at that stage I was not at the shooting range to know that it was a bomb that we made there.  The only bomb that I was certain about, was the Germiston bomb, because I saw that it was built.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="337">
			<speaker>MR MALAN</speaker>
			<text>But did you suspect that it was one of the bombs from your unit, or did you suspect that it was an AWB bomb?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="338">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I suspected that it was the unit that we were involved, that it was them who created the bomb explosion because that was the only bomb explosions at that time, it was coming from our group.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="339">
			<speaker>MR MALAN</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="340">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text>And did you actually discuss this with Mr Terreblanche, did you say to him, oh yes, that is one of ours?  Did you, yourself then identify with that and say oh, that must be one of ours because you were feeling good about this, all these terrorist acts of yours because of your objective, whatever that might have been?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="341">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, I did not discuss this with Mr Terreblanche, because the problem was that people were arrested because of these bomb explosions, and we wanted to get back as quick as possible to the shooting range, to report to them and tell them that people are being arrested because of the bomb explosions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="342">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text>But as one of Mr Terreblanche&#039;s former bodyguards, you were quite close to him, it is the type of thing you would normally have discussed with him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="343">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Mr Chairperson, but at that stage I did not, because of the people being arrested and we wanted to get to the shooting range as soon as possible.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="344">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Why did you suspect that it was one of your bombs?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="345">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, at that stage we were told, this is when I was at Brigadier Leon van der Merwe&#039;s house, that the people as they were moving up to the Volkstaat, there would be more bomb explosions in the Free State, Cape Province and Natal and that up until that point, none of those bomb explosions or any chaos which would have been spread, none of that took place and that is why I accepted that the explosion at Jan Smuts was part of the group that we were involved with.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="346">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Which group was this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="347">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Us who were at the game farm and then moved to the shooting range.  The Ystergarde, we weren&#039;t only Ystergarde members, there were also Natalians and in reality they came from the AWB&#039;s Wenkommando.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="348">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So the group you are referring to, is the AWB group?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="349">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Let&#039;s call it the AWB group because the Ystergarde and the Natalians were part of that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="350">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Up until that point, this group the AWB group, did not claim responsibility for any bomb, is that not so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="351">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="352">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Every time when somebody takes responsibility for a bomb, it was taken by one of the splinter groups?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="353">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="354">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>In the light thereof, why did you suspect that the bomb to which Mr Terreblanche referred to as a bomb, was maybe that it was coming from the AWB&#039;s side?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="355">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>It was my personal opinion at that stage Chairperson, I accepted and assumed that the bomb which exploded at Jan Smuts, came from our group which was gathered together.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="356">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But why?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="357">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Because all the bomb explosions up until that point, came from us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="358">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>That is the point I am trying to make and this is what is bothering me, at that stage it was always a splinter group which took responsibility, not the AWB?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="359">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is how I accepted it at that stage Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="360">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Mr de Wet, it is not quite clear to me what you mean with a splinter group, you yourself said you didn&#039;t know what word to use.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="361">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Can you not explain to us what you regard as a splinter group?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="362">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, if I must explain at one stage there were people in Rustenburg in 1993 and 1992, who planted a bomb.  At that stage he was the Commander of the AWB&#039;s Wenkommando and he for me, he was - the commando unit who was in the Brits area, he was the Commander of that area.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="363">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	He was involved in that bombing, he was a member of the AWB, he was a Commandant in the AWB, but when he was arrested for the bombing, it was the Boere Ordevolk who took responsibility for the explosion of the bomb.  For me, it was that because the AWB was involved in a political struggle, that they did not use the AWB&#039;s name, but a group which associated themselves with the AWB.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="364">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	A splinter group is just a group which breaks away from the main group.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="365">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Are you saying to us now that this BKA and Boere Orde group is part of the AWB?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="366">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>These are groups who break away from the AWB, who is not doing it under the name of the AWB, but doing it under their own organisations, like the Boere Ordevolk, or Boere Krisis Aksie. They are still a member of the AWB.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="367">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>So what you are actually saying, I don&#039;t know if you know the word, they were affiliated or an affiliated group of the AWB, is that what you mean?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="368">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="369">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>You must be very careful with the words that you use, because a splinter group means that it is a separate group and an affiliated group means that it is a group that reconcile themselves and see themselves as part of the AWB, you must be very careful with the words that you use, because it can be very confusing.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="370">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="371">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The way I understand your evidence thus far is that you accept that for those bomb plantings, it was in a capacity of the splinter groups as you called them, not in the name of the AWB?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="372">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Mr Chairman, the AWB never took responsibility for it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="373">
			<speaker>MR MALAN</speaker>
			<text>Can I just come back here, because even this affiliated groups give me a problem.  If I understand you correctly, there is a group of members who do something under a pseudonym or does something under another name?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="374">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, it is not a pseudonym, it is names that after a while, you can call it a type of code name because suddenly that organisation or group, was never part of the AWB after the deeds were done, these groups would then use this name.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="375">
			<speaker>MR MALAN</speaker>
			<text>It is a name for an action or an opportunity, so it depends on the opportunity or the circumstances?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="376">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="377">
			<speaker>MR MALAN</speaker>
			<text>Did you see it as part of the AWB&#039;s initiative or did you see it as part of a group of individuals&#039; agenda?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="378">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Mr Chairperson, it had the approval of the AWB and other institutions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="379">
			<speaker>MR MALAN</speaker>
			<text>Did they have the approval or did you see them as part of their own personal agenda?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="380">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it was part of their agenda, because if someone did something, they would then take responsibility for it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="381">
			<speaker>MR MALAN</speaker>
			<text>You don&#039;t think that they just got on the wagon later on, got on the bandwagon in order to focus attention to themselves and that it not necessarily was planned?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="382">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Mr Chairperson, for me it was deeds that were planned because in circles they talked about the right wing who did it or the AWB who did it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="383">
			<speaker>MR MALAN</speaker>
			<text>The series of bomb plantings that took place, would you describe that as a splinter group action?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="384">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Mr Chairperson, that what I understood from Nico Prinsloo and Barnard, is that the AWB would take responsibility for it because it was instructions that came directly from Eugene Terreblanche.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="385">
			<speaker>MR MALAN</speaker>
			<text>I think you should in this evidence, keep with the splinter group concept because otherwise we are going to get confused.  We can try and understand the concept better, but I don&#039;t think you must use other names for the same term.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="386">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="387">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, on behalf of the victim for whom I appear and I believe on behalf of Ms Cambanis who sits next to me, we are deeply disturbed by the questioning which has just taken place.  We would like a few minutes to consider our position and to see whether an application ought not to be considered or not.  We would just like about a ten minute</text>
		</line>
		<line number="388">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>adjournment, possibly an early tea adjournment even.  Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="389">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="390">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>... might be to move an application for the recusal of one of the members of the Committee, Mr Wynand Malan.  Mr Chairman, Section 36 of the Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act makes it quite clear that the Commission and every member of the staff, shall function without any political or other bias or interference and shall be independent.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="391">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	It is my submission that Mr Malan has indicated by his questioning, that he is biased in favour of the applicants, that he is aware of the applicant&#039;s difficulties and has asked questions of a particular nature designed to stop certain holes which have appeared in the applicant&#039;s case.  In order to understand the application Mr Chairman I need to give a bit of background.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="392">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Chairman, it is the applicant&#039;s contention that they were acting on the orders and instructions of the AWB and under their auspices when these dastardly deeds were committed in Bree Street, Germiston and other places.	What has emerged after Mr Barnard and Mr Myburgh withdrew their applications, is that they were left without Mr Barnard who had a large role to play in the planning, according to the documents, a large role to play in the planning.  They are left in the situation where they don&#039;t know whether Mr Barnard had any real role to play in the AWB, they don&#039;t know his rank, they know nothing about him. They don&#039;t know where he gets his instructions from.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="393">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	What we do know is that an organisation by the name of Boere Krisis Aksie took responsibility for the bomb in Bree Street, what we do know is that there is no evidence before this Court at, before this Committee at this stage that the AWB has taken responsibility for the bombings.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="394">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	In fact, on the contrary it seems that the AWB at no stage publicly took responsibility.  Now, that presents a problem for the applicants in that the applicants may well end in these proceedings, with there being a strong belief that the actions undertaken by inter alia Mr Barnard, upon which this particular applicant in the witness box at the moment, also relies, that those actions were taken either by Mr Barnard in his personal capacity or as part of another organisation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="395">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	It is our submission that Mr Malan has, in his questioning of this witness, taken it upon himself to assist the witness in demonstrating that actions that were taken, even if they were taken by other groups, were actions of the AWB and indeed the last question which was asked, was to the effect - did you see it as part, that is now the ANC, the AWB&#039;s planning and agenda and he promptly said that that is the case.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="396">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Also there was questions which suggested quite clearly that the answer should be that this was part of the AWB, that this carried the approval of the AWB and as I say, (indistinct) with it in fact being part of the AWB&#039;s planning and agenda.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="397">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	This is asked, with respect, by the learned member of the Committee, at a time when he is aware that this particular witness has no knowledge of the planning and agenda, he has never testified that he knows what the AWB&#039;s agenda was in relation to the splinter groups, he didn&#039;t know what the AWB&#039;s plan was in regard to the Bree Street bomb, in fact according to his evidence, he knew nothing about it before the bomb actually went off.  Yet, all these questions are designed to again bring these actions by these desperate people, and at this stage, no evidence that they were acting on behalf of the AWB, under the umbrella of the AWB and in our submission, the reason for that is quite clear, the evidence at this stage is going very much against the applicants in proving that these were actions of the AWB, that they were orders carried out on behalf of the AWB.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="398">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	At this stage the closest one can get is that some of these acts were committed under the orders possibly of Mr Barnard.   It is our submission that there are other issues, which still need to be dealt with and one of the issues which ought to have been dealt with before Mr Malan suggested that this was all part of the planning and the agenda of the AWB, is what is the status of these splinter organisations.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="399">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	The witness&#039; evidence is clear that they were separate from the AWB, it was only during questioning that the seed was planted that they may in fact have been the AWB.  Mr Chairman, there has been evidence in previous applications before the Amnesty Committee that the Boere Ordevolk exists as a separate organisation and indeed if I can refer you to the amnesty decision in relation to David Petrus Botha, Adriaan Smuts and Eugene Marais heard in Durban on the 12th of August 1996, it is clear from the majority decision in that case, that the Orde Boerevolk operates under the leadership of a Mr Piet Rudolph, that it is more militant than the AWB and that this organisation and members of this organisation, have to take an oath which is not the same as an oath which the AWB members would take, and certainly their aims and objectives are different to that of the AWB.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="400">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Before any of that could have been dealt with, Mr Malan has already taken the view, in our submission, and in our submission taken more than the view and indeed has made up his mind that these splinter groups are in fact part of the AWB, part of its planning, part of its agenda and that therefore they should not be seen as separate to the AWB.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="401">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	There is, with respect, no objective evidence and there is nothing at all on record, to suggest that that is the case or that those suggestions should have been made at this particular stage.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="402">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	We submit that this demonstrates on an objective basis, never mind the subjective basis which the Supreme Court of Appeal indicated in S v Malindi &amp; Others, that Mr Malan has made up his mind about certain aspects of this application, that he is showing bias in assisting the applicants to overcome what is clearly a difficulty standing in their way and we accordingly submit that in the light of the comments which have been made by Mr Malan and his thinking which is quite clearly in favour of finding that even if there were splinter groups, they were AWB - it was still the AWB&#039;s agenda and purpose in action, that that is a matter which ought not to have been expressed at this stage and we respectfully submit that from an objective and certainly from a subjective point of view, it is clear that Mr Malan has made up his mind about certain aspects of this application before hearing any evidence from the victims, never mind having heard all the evidence on behalf of the applicants.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="403">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Chairman, I also want to point out that Mr Malan has intervened previously in this application and we submit that when those interventions are taken globally, then it is clear that there is a bias in favour of the applicants.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="404">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I wish to refer to only one other incident, and that is when Mr Fourie was testifying and again it was clear under cross-examination by myself, that Mr Fourie could not in any way say that he either committed, aided, planned, advised or ordered or any of the requirements in the Act, anything to do with the Bree Street bombing, Mr Malan&#039;s intervention at that stage was to say to the witness well, you associated yourself with that bombing.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="405">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Again, attempting to assist an applicant to bring himself into the net so that he can apply successfully and that he can be successful in his amnesty application.  It is therefore with some regret, it is my unpleasant task then to ask that Mr Malan recuse himself from the Committee, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="406">
			<speaker>MS CAMBANIS</speaker>
			<text>Just for purposes of the record, may I just state that I associate myself with the argument submitted by Adv Landman in this matter.  I have nothing further to add, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="407">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Anybody else wish to associate themselves with the application?  No?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="408">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Landman, you referred to certain comments made by Mr Malan.  Do you argue that that was intended to assist the applicant?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="409">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>That is my argument yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="410">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Which comments would these be?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="411">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Commissioner, when I refer to comments, comments some of them, phrased as if they were questions, but clearly in circumstances where the answer was clear, for example to Mr Fourie that he in fact associated himself with the acts which were committed, in regard to Mr De Wet&#039;s application, comments such as that the actions which were committed under what was called pseudonym, a word in my submission which was brought up by Mr Malan, that that carried the approval of the AWB, that it was part of the AWB&#039;s planning and agenda, this at a time when there is no evidence whatsoever that that was part of the planning and agenda.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="412">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Also the suggestion which was made not from the witness, but by Mr Malan, that these were merely coincidental or incident names which were used in order to possibly cover up a connection with the AWB.   That is not this witness&#039; evidence and we submit that these are all matters which are assisting and are designed to assist and at the very least, certainly have the effect of assisting Mr De Wet.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="413">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Does the matter as to whether it came to the rescue, assuming that your argument is correct, that Mr Malan&#039;s comments came to the rescue of certain applicants, is that factual?  Did it come to their assistance?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="414">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Well, our submission it certainly shows an attempt to assist the ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="415">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Does it matter whether it did get that result or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="416">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Our submission, it doesn&#039;t matter whether it does achieve that result or not, but the fact of the matter is that in response to these highly suggestive questions which, we submit, demonstrate Mr Malan&#039;s state of mind, that the witnesses were more than eager, to accept and entertain what was said by Mr Malan and to make it part in effect, part of their case.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="417">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And you say from these comments, you submit that we can come to a conclusion that he has taken a particular view in favour of the applicants?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="418">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>That is our submission, that is my submission, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="419">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So really, the allegation as to biasness is based on one aspect, that his comments are such that one can draw a conclusion as to biasness in favour of the applicants?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="420">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, our submission is that to prove bias in many cases, is difficult in the sense that it is a question of a state of mind of a particular person.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="421">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	The only way in which, one of the only ways in which one is able to determine the state of mind of a person, is to analyse what that person has said or done.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="422">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Doesn&#039;t the test go further and to examine why such questions were posed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="423">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, we submit that it is relevant to look at the context within which those questions were posed.  The questions were posed in the context of another member of the Committee, asking questions as to whether or not these were affiliated groups or not so you now have a situation of well, maybe the Boere Krisis Aksie as an organisation is somehow affiliated to the AWB, that is what came out from Adv Bosman&#039;s questioning.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="424">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Malan, however, went much further than that.  What he then suggested to the witness and indeed, this was - it was put in a sense and certainly it came across from this side, that this is how he in fact sees the situation.  This is how it should be seen, namely that these are merely pseudonyms, these are names which are used behind which the AWB members hide, whereas in fact it is AWB members and AWB policy and planning which has been put into effect behind these pseudonyms.  That of course is one ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="425">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>That is one view.  Isn&#039;t it possible to have another view and that is that that is what the witness thinks, whether it is true or not, that was how the witness saw it at that time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="426">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, our submission is that that is not how the witness saw it.  Indeed his evidence before the intervention from the Committee, and I talk in this case of both Mr Malan and Adv Bosman, at that stage it was clear that these were separate groups, these were the Boere Ordevolk and other organisations that were separate.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="427">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	It was on suggestions by, it came out of the evidence or rather the examination by Adv Bosman, that they were what was in the words of the Committee member, affiliated groups.  An affiliated group is a group, it is something which operates separately, but is somehow connected to another group.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="428">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	What Mr Malan then did was to attempt to destroy that distinction altogether in order once again to bring the actions of those groups, into and under the umbrella of the AWB by now watering down the concept of affiliated groups, now to simply to be pseudonyms.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="429">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Our submission is that that is an indication of Mr Malan&#039;s efforts in our submission, to demonstrate via this witness&#039; answers, but to demonstrate and to plant a seed in everyone&#039;s mind, that well, whatever is said about splinter groups, this is nevertheless in fact AWB acting in whatever way.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="430">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The ordinary interpretation of splinter groups, what would you say that is?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="431">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Well, a splinter group is a group which has a separate identity, which has moved away from a organisation to which it originally belonged.  For example the PAC would have become a splinter group of the ANC and there is no suggestion in anyone&#039;s mind that the PAC is now part of the ANC, in fact there is a lot of people who would ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="432">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Quite the contrary.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="433">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Would be most angry if one said that, and in our submission in the same way, a splinter group and in particular, I have already referred to the Boere Ordevolk, which we suggest is now clear from the evidence, is not simply just an alias.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="434">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I accept that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="435">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>But what Mr Malan has attempted to plant is that well, these organisations doesn&#039;t count, they don&#039;t count.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="436">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I raise that issue and as my memory serves me, the witness indicated that he, before coining the phrase splinter group, that he was not sure as to how to describe this group, or these groups, &quot;just call it splinter group&quot;, - with your argument?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="437">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Because at no stage did he attempt to suggest that these were merely alias which ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="438">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>No, I accept that but he was trying to find the proper phraseology if you want to call it and came up with the phrase splinter group.  I am not saying that you are incorrect in your submissions, I am just asking you to assist me in putting your argument in that kind of context.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="439">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, inasmuch as there may have been some confusion about what he was referring to ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="440">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The fact of the matter is that he did preface his answer at that stage, he said I don&#039;t know what to call it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="441">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>He then went on to refer to a organisation which we now know has come before one of the Committees before and that is the Boere Ordevolk.  Once he has done that, in our submission is clear that we now are talking about an organisation, it has a name now and especially in the light of the fact that one of the enquiries which this Committee will have to consider carefully is whether or not this is an AWB action or whether the Bree Street bombing was Boere Krisis Aksie or whether it was Barnard incorporated, we don&#039;t know.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="442">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Landman, my problem is not that the witness may or not have fortuitously taken advantage of the opportunity to flower his evidence, that is another matter, my concern at the moment is that the opportunity created by the questions from Mr Malan was taken advantage of perhaps, but in creating the opportunity, was Mr Malan being biased?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="443">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>In our submission ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="444">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And was he biased and can we properly say that he was biased if we take into consideration the preface which I referred to before the witness coined the phrase splinter group?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="445">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, our submission still is that when all of his questions are taken into account, that not only does it refer to these alias,  and suggest that it was merely an alias it goes further.  It goes further.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="446">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	There are suggestions made that what these individuals were doing, that that was being done with at least the approval of the AWB and that the questions asked well, did you see it as part of the AWB&#039;s planning and agenda and again, the clear suggestion in my submission, in all of that evidence, is that I want you to say and I want you to understand that as I see this whole case, that everything that was done in connection with the Bree Street bomb and the other bombings, was part of the planning and agenda of the AWB.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="447">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Landman, the questioning and the attempting to take advantage of this opportunity to colour his evidence, may in fact operate against the witness, not so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="448">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, it may well operate against the witness.  My submission, the enquiry really at this stage is an enquiry of an objective basis as to whether Mr Malan has indicated in his questioning, that he has formed a particular view that the actions of Mr Barnard and the others, on whose behalf those actions were done.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="449">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Our submission is that this is clear that what Mr Malan was attempting to achieve here, was to attempt to destroy any suggestion that there might be in the evidence, that Mr Barnard might have been acting on his own, alternatively that Mr Barnard might have been acting on behalf of another group.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="450">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	What Mr Malan has attempted to do in this questioning, and these are the questions of Mr Malan, not of the witness, it is Mr Malan who suggests to the witness but those are only alias, what was being done by these so-called alias groups, was in fact being done as part of the planning and the agenda of the AWB.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="451">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	In our submission that indicates quite clearly that that is Mr Malan&#039;s view of the matter and that is Mr Malan&#039;s clear view, that that is in fact what he intends to find.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="452">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Chairman, the other aspect of the matter is of course that Mr Malan has asked these questions and clearly in his own mind, he will know what the effect of those questions must have been, with respect.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="453">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And you discount the possibility of the questions being posed merely to clarify certain things?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="454">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>That is so.  We submit that in the context of the question and the manner in which these questions were being asked, that that possibility ought to be discounted.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="455">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Is that all?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="456">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, just lastly, in our submission if one listens to the questioning, it is clear that this was an attempt to put words into the mouth of Mr de Wet, as well as Mr Fourie on an earlier occasion, in order to ensure that the evidence comes out in a particular fashion, which would be favourable to the applicants.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="457">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	That is all I have to say.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="458">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And you say that falsifies the submission of biasness?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="459">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>That is so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="460">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Prior, do you have any submissions to make?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="461">
			<speaker>MR PRIOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, from the Evidence Leader&#039;s position, certainly there was no understanding from my position that there was any bias, in fact I think that Mr Malan, right at the end said when you now refer to these groups, to avoid confusion, refer to them as splinter groups, so that we know what you are talking about.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="462">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Certainly I cannot support the application.  Certainly from where I am sitting, I did not understand the questioning by Mr Malan to convey any sense of bias, obviously that is from my position, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="463">
			<speaker>COUNSEL</speaker>
			<text>Committee would be, whether we would have to start again or get a re-appointment of the three remaining members, if somebody could just think about that, because I would hate to have wasted a week of my life.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="464">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Anybody (indistinct) themselves, or himself or herself, the convenience of the Committee or the TRC is not a matter I must consider.  I must consider the application and grant it or refuse it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="465">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Conveniences of any particular individual or Committee, is not a factor I must keep into consideration.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="466">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Yes, well the point is made and I will certainly check.  We will adjourn and I - we will take the early ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="467">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="468">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>ON RESUMPTION</text>
		</line>
		<line number="469">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Before we adjourned, there was a substantive application for me to make a ruling in respect of an application for the recusal from the Committee, by Mr Malan.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="470">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	We have considered the matter and we have come to the conclusion that the application should not succeed.  The ruling is therefore that the application is refused and without wanting to sound topical we will give reasons if necessary at a later stage.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="471">
			<speaker>JAN B DE WET</speaker>
			<text>(still under oath)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="472">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>(cont)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="473">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr de Wet, can I take you back to your evidence.  You testified and you were questioned about this, this is with regards to the BKA who accepted the responsibility and that was in the media?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="474">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="475">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>The BKA, were they responsible for the explosions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="476">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>As far as I was concerned, no, it was the AWB</text>
		</line>
		<line number="477">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>who was involved.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="478">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Why do you say so according to your opinion?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="479">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Because the instructions came from Nico Prinsloo and Brigadier Van der Merwe.  Those were the instructions I received from them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="480">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	And if it did not carry Eugene Terreblanche&#039;s approval, then I don&#039;t think Prinsloo would not have given the instructions if he did not carry the approval of Terreblanche.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="481">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>You were a member of the Ystergarde, what was Nico Prinsloo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="482">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>He was the Secretary General of the AWB.  At one stage he was a Captain in the Ystergarde, but for this operation, he was placed in the position of General over the Ystergarde, that is how I saw it at that stage.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="483">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>From a Captain to General?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="484">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>He was a General in the Staff Generals and because he represented us on the Staff Generals, that is why I believe he became General over us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="485">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>What you are saying is that when he was a member of the Ystergarde, before he joined the Staff Generals he was a Captain?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="486">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>When you are selected to become a Garde, you either become a Lieutenant or a Captain and then there will be later a promotion and that would happen if you work yourself up or certain concessions are made.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="487">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	He was a Captain in the Garde, even though he served on the Staff Generals before that, he was Secretary General of the AWB, but it was a requirement that everybody who worked for Terreblanche, had to have training in the Garde and that is why I said he was a Captain, because he successfully succeeded in the training.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="488">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>When did he become a General?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="489">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Before he joined the Garde course, he was a General, he served as Secretary General of the AWB.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="490">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>So do I understand your evidence now correctly that he was a member of the Staff Generals?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="491">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="492">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>And then he had to do a course at the Ystergarde?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="493">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he had to do that because he was directly involved in the security of Mr Terreblanche and the protection of Mr Terreblanche.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="494">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>And there he gained the rank of Captain?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="495">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="496">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>At that stage, when the operation was going on, where was he functioning?  Was he at Head Office or was he in another Division?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="497">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>He was working at Head Office, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="498">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Directly under Eugene Terreblanche?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="499">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, together with Terreblanche in his office.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="500">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>And Brigadier Leon van der Merwe, what was his position?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="501">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>He was a Brigadier in the Ystergarde and he was also responsible for the protection of Mr Terreblanche.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="502">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Where was his office, in which area?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="503">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>His office was in the office together with the offices of Terreblanche, in the complex where the AWB had its Headquarters.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="504">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>So according to you, as far as you were concerned, the instruction was from the AWB and then you referred to these two people who had direct contact with Head Office?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="505">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="506">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>And any other Generals, did you see any of the other Generals at these gatherings?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="507">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Where we got together at the game farm, there was General Andries Terreblanche, that is Eugene Terreblanche&#039;s brother, he was there as well as other Generals.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="508">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	If I remember, that was the Saturday when we arrived there.  There was an Orde group which some people attended and some of the Generals were present there.  General Alec Cruywagen, he was also there at a certain stage.  Which day exactly it was, I cannot remember, but I know he was there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="509">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>An Orde group meeting, is that a closed meeting?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="510">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is a closed meeting Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="511">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr De Wet, can you speak a little bit slower. MR DE WET:   I will try Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="512">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>During this operation, you received instructions from General Nico Prinsloo in order to make your vehicle available?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="513">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="514">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>How did you see this instruction?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="515">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>To me it was a question of a General giving me an instruction, we were together as a group.  He first asked me if I would make my vehicle available and I said yes, I would, and then I accepted his instruction and therefore I made it available.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="516">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>An instruction from a private person?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="517">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No, it was an instruction from the General who was with us at the game farm.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="518">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Who acted on behalf of who?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="519">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>On behalf of the AWB.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="520">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr De Wet, please explain something to me.  I do not follow you very well.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="521">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	You are saying that at that stage you did what you did, because there was an instruction.  Didn&#039;t you want to do it yourself?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="522">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>The struggle for freedom, it was also an ideal that I strived for, that was to obtain a Volkstaat.  Because I was told that there was a war, I voluntarily made myself available for the struggle.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="523">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So do I understand you correctly, the instruction only gave you the opportunity to do what you did?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="524">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>The instruction was given to me and I reconciled myself with the instructions I received.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="525">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="526">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Just to link up with that question, this instruction that you have just testified about, this was in connection with your amnesty application, but you also testified that a long time before this operation, there were already talk of a revolution and war?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="527">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="528">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>And you who worked very closely with Terreblanche, what was your opinion or your view with regards to the revolution and the war?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="529">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>For me in the run up to the election, it was implicitly shown by the media and also by certain ANC members that no Volkstaat ideology would realise and together with what Mr Terreblanche said, the fact that we do not negotiate with the ANC and that if they do not give what we want, we will make war, and we will use bomb explosions or firearms, or whatever, and I reconciled myself with that, that we were going to take up the struggle against the ANC and the National Party.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="530">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Were you prepared to make war?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="531">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I was prepared to give my life for God, nation and father land.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="532">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Let&#039;s look at your vehicle again, you testified that you were told by General Prinsloo to remove the tow bar from your vehicle?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="533">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="534">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Did you do it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="535">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I did it, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="536">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Cliffie Barnard whom you also testified about, do you know which rank he held?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="537">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Cliffie was a Colonel at the AWB.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="538">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>How did you view him as a member of the AWB, what was his relationship with the Staff Generals, do you know?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="539">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>As far as the Staff Generals is concerned, I do not know, but it appeared to me that him and Terreblanche had a very good relationship and that he did certain things for Mr Terreblanche when they were having meetings.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="540">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	When they were together in the office, nobody else was allowed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="541">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr De Wet, in the evidence of the previous applicants, there was evidence which indicated at some stage it was said that the ranks were going to be abandoned, or were abandoned.  Can you remember such evidence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="542">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="543">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did you carry knowledge of that at that time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="544">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I only went to Ventersdorp at a later stage, but Leon van der Merwe informed me that ranks would not exist because certain people were given instructions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="545">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>When was this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="546">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>This was on the 21st or the 22nd, when I heard this from Van der Merwe?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="547">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>That is before the election, before there were talk of bombs?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="548">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.  He told me it was war.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="549">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The evidence which is aimed at trying to show that you reacted on the instructions of people who had rank, that is senseless because ranks no longer existed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="550">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No, ranks didn&#039;t exist, but in my eyes, he was still a General.  General Prinsloo and Leon van der Merwe, a Brigadier, and the instructions I received from them, my instructions, I got from them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="551">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But if you say there are no ranks any more, we are all equal, we are in battle, what is the worth of that evidence that you got instructions from a person with a certain rank?  I do not follow, please help me?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="552">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	If there weren&#039;t any ranks, what is the worth of that type of evidence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="553">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>It is when we addressed each other in public, I would not say General can I talk to you Captain, or whatever, but in the inner circles it still existed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="554">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	We were together on the farm, and I spoke to someone, because I was brought up this way and also the fact that I did military service, I still used these ranks.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="555">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Let me just take you back to Exhibit F Chairperson, just to link up with the fact that statements were made pertaining to the fact that you just acted.  This was put to the other applicants, you acted not on behalf of the AWB.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="556">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	You testified that you were present at the meeting in Lichtenburg and you also saw the news report afterwards, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="557">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="558">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>It seems from the news report, the paper that the evening the hall was in darkness, do you know about that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="559">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson, because of the bomb explosion which took place earlier that day somewhere next to the road, Mr Terreblanche told us, he told the public there, that he apologises for there being no power, because they brought the generators to generate power and he asked the people to apologise for the noise, because there is no power because of bomb explosions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="560">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Shortly after that he said that if the ANC and the National Party would not listen to our demand of a Volkstaat, there would be further bomb explosions, and these would be bigger than the ones already exploded.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="561">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Did you know who caused the bomb explosion at the power station?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="562">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I knew who were the two people involved in that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="563">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Who were they?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="564">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>De Wet Ras and Breytenbach, they also applied for amnesty.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="565">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>You say De Wet Ras, there is a De Wet Strydom.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="566">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I apologise Chairperson, De Wet Strydom and Breytenbach were the two people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="567">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>The report goes further in the third paragraph, this is now Terreblanche speaking and the violence would not only take place within the Afrikaner area which they considered the Volkstaat, but also all over the country and then you would get nothing.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="568">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	That is what he said addressing the ANC.  Do you have any comment on this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="569">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That was because of the utterances made by the ANC leaders.  The fact that they said one bullet, Kill a Boer, Kill a Farmer.  I think it was because of that, that if the ANC would not get anything out of this whole deal.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="570">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>He goes further and he says at the meeting as well, that if they want the bombs to stop exploding, they must admit the nation&#039;s right which leads every nation to determine himself, with the right to self determination.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="571">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Ferdi Hartzenberg was also at the meeting, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="572">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.  And if I can remember correctly, Constand Viljoen was also there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="573">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>It seems quite evident that he was adamant on a white election or referendum so that the will of the nation which is quoted, so that it could be demonstrated?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="574">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes Chairperson, the Freedom Front, the AWB and the other right wing organisations, they often asked at these meetings that a white election could be held so that we can determine whether the whites wanted a general election or not.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="575">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>What was your idea, and this idea did the AWB have the same objective?  What would have happened if the election took place with regards to the ideal of the AWB to establish a Volkstaat?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="576">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>If the elections took place, no regard would have been given to a Volkstaat for the white Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="577">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>And he said that is why the AWB wanted to stop the election?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="578">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="579">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Mr De Wet, did you gain any personal benefit from these deeds?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="580">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>None Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="581">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>What was your situation before this operation, you said you lost your job, but did you have ground on which you were farming?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="582">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>After I worked for a while in the AWB, I started working for a private business.  I stayed on a farm on Ottosdal where I farmed.  When the Volkstaat became an ideal, we received the call up instructions, I lost all of that.  Today I&#039;ve got nothing.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="583">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Did you commit any of these deeds out of malice?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="584">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No, I did not do it out of malice, I did it for the organisation, the AWB.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="585">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>You did not testify about all of the meetings, but do you confirm the contents of your amnesty application?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="586">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I confirm it Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="587">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>No further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="588">
			<speaker>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="589">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairperson.  Mr De Wet, you gave evidence that you and Mr Potgieter who were your co-accused, was this a person that was accused with you or was he a State witness?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="590">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>If I can remember correctly, he was at one stage charged, but he was only in prison for a while and then they used him as a State witness against us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="591">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mr De Wet,  in Exhibit F that was shown to you it is also said that earlier the week Mr Terreblanche said that if the Afrikaners before the 27th of April get a Volkstaat or be added into the constitution, there will be no force big enough to stop them, that hell will break loose and that neither me or Ferdi Hartzenberg will be able to stop that.  How did you interpret that, you said that you did read the article?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="592">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>For me it was a very real instruction, that we will fight this war if we did not get what we wanted.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="593">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did you understand out of this that these explosions would occur before the election?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="594">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, before the election, with the election and I believe also after the elections, if the people were not arrested, there would be other bomb explosions and violence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="595">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>After the explosion at Bree Street, did you see it on TV at any stage during that day?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="596">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>The Bree Street explosion we saw the Sunday evening on the television.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="597">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>What impression did it leave with you, what you saw?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="598">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>The person who read the news that evening said that it, I am going to use my own words, it made a very big impression on the world because there is someone who would like to disrupt the election.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="599">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	The media put it very clearly that someone wants to disrupt the election.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="600">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did you believe that those explosions would prevent the elections from continuing?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="601">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it was very clear that with such explosions, there would be no election.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="602">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>With the explosions that occurred the next day, that is now the Monday, the 25th of April in Germiston and the pipe bombings, as well as an explosion in Pretoria, what was your impression or global expression regarding those explosions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="603">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That the chaos that would come from this, would disrupt the elections.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="604">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Would it have any purpose if you allowed to when the election started, to only begin with your bombings on that day?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="605">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No, it was a struggle that began in the early 1990&#039;s.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="606">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="607">
			<speaker>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="608">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairman.  Mr De Wet, just referring to Exhibit F again, that is the newspaper article, the third paragraph on the left hand side.  The violence will not only take place in the area which the Afrikaners see as the Volkstaat, but across the whole country, and you will get bugger all or then you will get bugger all.  That is what he said of the ANC.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="609">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	What did he mean when he said that they would get bugger all?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="610">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That the country will never belong to the ANC at that stage.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="611">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Would there by anything left of the country for the ANC?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="612">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, something would have been left.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="613">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>What is &quot;bugger-all&quot; then?  What does that mean?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="614">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>We would fight against the ANC, we would make war against them and that is the impression that I got from that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="615">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Sir, I put it to you it is clear here, what you are saying is that there will be violence everywhere, and there will be nothing left for the ANC, isn&#039;t that so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="616">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is what it says yes, I saw it that there would be something left for a new beginning.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="617">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>How do you make that conclusion?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="618">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Sir, I believe that you would have to plant a whole lot of bombs if you want to destroy the whole country in order for there to be nothing left.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="619">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I know that is the practical conclusion of that, the question is how did you understand that sentence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="620">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>For me it was that nothing would be given to the ANC, we will fight for what is ours.  That is how I interpreted it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="621">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Sir, I want to put it to you that the other interpretation which is more clear, is that you will attempt to destroy everything, so that there will be nothing left?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="622">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I do not agree with that Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="623">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>That is why you planted all these highly damaging bombs that destroyed buildings?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="624">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>The bombs that were planted in Johannesburg, it was only a small part that was destroyed and it was not the whole of Johannesburg.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="625">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Mr De Wet, seeing the carnage caused by the Bree Street bomb on television on the Sunday night, did you think a few more of these big bombs would then bring an end to the election?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="626">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I believed that it was possible.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="627">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>And that is all that you wanted to do, was to stop the election?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="628">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, to stop the election.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="629">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>There was no need to throw pipe bombs, small pipe bombs at groups of people?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="630">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Sir, I was not the planner of the pipe bombs, so I cannot say what the purpose was of them.  If it was also possibly to create further chaos.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="631">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Did you participate in the throwing of the pipe bombs?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="632">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, I was not part of it but I was present when it was demonstrated and I transported it from Koesterfontein to the game farm.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="633">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr De Wet, you gave evidence or testified as far as I remember that you reconciled yourself with the pipe bombs and that which was done with it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="634">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="635">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>In the light of that, can you maybe answer again to the question that Mr Landman asked you about why pipe bombs were used?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="636">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, all that I can add there is that that is to create further chaos in order to stop the election.  That is my personal opinion and that is how I saw it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="637">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>It is not a question that you cannot answer the question because you did not do the planning?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="638">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I did not do any planning regarding the pipe bombs because I did reconcile myself with the group with whom I was at that stage.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="639">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Mr De Wet, when you drew up your application for amnesty, did you try to put in all the facts that you knew, that might be relevant to your application?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="640">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, when my Advocates for Barnard, Le Roux and Myburgh was us in prison, we consulted together.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="641">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I gave them my version and asked the Advocates to submit my application as close as possible to what I have given them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="642">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Did you leave anything out of your application?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="643">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Sir, if I can say the biggest detail is not included but the matter that it is about, does appear.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="644">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Did you know that you were applying for amnesty for offences which you hadn&#039;t been convicted of?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="645">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Chairperson, the day when I was sentenced in the High Court, the Judge I cannot remember his surname, the Judge said that I will be charged for everything.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="646">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Did he say you were found guilty for everything?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="647">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="648">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Are you guilty of the Bree Street bomb?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="649">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="650">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>You had nothing to do with that?  You had nothing to do with planning it or committing that act at all?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="651">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No, I was not involved in the Bree Street bombing at all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="652">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>You went to Ventersdorp in April in order to protect the borders of your Volkstaat?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="653">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>No, he said Mr Landman that the only reason going to Ventersdorp was the intention of stopping the elections.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="654">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, I apologise.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="655">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>It is different from the previous evidence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="656">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Mr De Wet, maybe you can tell us again, why did you go to Ventersdorp?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="657">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, in Ventersdorp I worked there after I got a package at the mine.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="658">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	There I started a guard unit in order to protect Mr Terreblanche and his family as well as the Staff Generals.  Afterwards I left Ventersdorp because of, in order to build myself financially.  I was called up to go to Ventersdorp and it was there that I could not attend the Trim Park meeting.  I gave evidence today, it was the 21st or the 22nd according to Brigadier Leon van der Merwe, where I received the instructions that were given at Trim Park, from him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="659">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>What instructions did you receive at the Trim Park, at Brigadier van der Merwe?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="660">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Brigadier Van der Merwe, Johan Smit was there and it was told to me that it is war, that I must find a secure place where I could put my wife and children and later on, I will receive further instructions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="661">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>When you left your home and went to Ventersdorp, why did you go to Ventersdorp?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="662">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>To go and hear what the instructions were that was given to the people at Trim Park.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="663">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Mr De Wet, at the time you went to Ventersdorp, that day, you didn&#039;t know what the reason was for being called to Ventersdorp?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="664">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Mr Chairperson, I did not know.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="665">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>And you ended up going to the game farm where you actually did, you became a guard to guard the farm, is that right?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="666">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, the day when I went to Ventersdorp and met Brigadier Van der Merwe to hear what his instructions were, I went back to my home and from there I left with the women to the game farm.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="667">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>And there you carried out guard duties?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="668">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="669">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>And were you also not to protect the borders of the Volkstaat?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="670">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No, the borders of the Volkstaat, there were other commando&#039;s in the area who did that.  My instruction there was that further instructions would be given to us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="671">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Mr De Wet, if I can just take you to something else.  The farm where you saw the gas cylinder bomb being built, was that Koesterfontein?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="672">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.  That was the farm of Abraham Myburgh&#039;s father.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="673">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>So that bomb was built away from the main group of AWB supporters who were at the game farm at the time, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="674">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it was away from the group that stayed at the game farm.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="675">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>And only a very few people knew about that, the group of people who were on Koesterfontein?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="676">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>At that stage yes, I understood it that way.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="677">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>And we know that the Bree Street bomb was built there, at Koesterfontein, do you agree with that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="678">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it did come out.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="679">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>The bomb for Germiston where you were involved, that was also built there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="680">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it was also built at Koesterfontein.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="681">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>The Jan Smuts bomb, where was that built?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="682">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Out of the court case I understood that it was at the shooting range in Rustenburg.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="683">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Would you agree with me Mr De Wet, that those people who moved to Ventersdorp and then later moved to the game farm, they were what one can describe at the &quot;bitter einders&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="684">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairperson, there were other AWB members of the AWB Wenkommando from the Western Transvaal, who also gathered there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="685">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Where were they, on whose farm were they?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="686">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Sir, just outside Brits on Mr Manie Maritz&#039; farm there were also people, between Mooinooi and Brits, there was also a farm.  I do not know who the owner was, there were also people.  Near Koster, it is a holiday resort, there were also people there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="687">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	On a farm near Ottosdal, I think it is Mr Koos Hough who was the owner of the farm, people were gathered there as well.  Also close to Klerksdorp people gathered.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="688">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Mr De Wet, when did you for the first time think or realise that maybe some of these people at Koesterfontein were responsible for the Bree Street bomb?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="689">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That evening, the Sunday evening when I arrived at Koesterfontein and I saw the gas bottle and explosives.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="690">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>How well did you know Cliffie Barnard?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="691">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>For the period when I was at Ventersdorp, worked there at the office, I knew him very well.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="692">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Have you had braais and brandy and Coke together?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="693">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="694">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>What did you call him when you saw him at the AWB Headquarters?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="695">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I addressed him as Colonel.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="696">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Did he object to that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="697">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="698">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>He never said to you I don&#039;t want to be called by my rank?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="699">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Mr Chairperson, he never said that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="700">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Did other people also call him Colonel?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="701">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes Mr Chairperson, Mr Terreblanche also called him that and Mr Prinsloo, and other people who also worked at Head Office.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="702">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>From time to time did ordinary members of the AWB come to the Headquarters and speak to Mr Barnard?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="703">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, the people from the area, the Western Transvaal district also came to the office and also addressed him as Colonel.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="704">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Isn&#039;t it strange that Mr Le Roux and Mr Fourie didn&#039;t know and never referred to Mr Barnard as Colonel?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="705">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, I cannot remember in that period when I worked at Ventersdorp that Mr Fourie or Mr Le Roux came to Ventersdorp at any stage.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="706">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Fourie was an important man, he was one of the bodyguards of the leader, wasn&#039;t he?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="707">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes Sir, that is true, but they worked in another district and when Mr Terreblanche let&#039;s say go to Johannesburg or Witwatersrand, then Barnard wasn&#039;t always with him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="708">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>But he was at times with the leader in places like Johannesburg?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="709">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, the times when he did drive with Mr Terreblanche, he did not wear his uniform.  I can concede to that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="710">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>So he normally wore a uniform at the office, at Headquarters?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="711">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Mr Chairperson, in the office he did not wear his uniform.  He did though, or let me put it this way, he was a Colonel and I can confirm that in parades that we attended and when he was on a horse, he had the uniform of a Colonel.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="712">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Did he ever fall off?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="713">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="714">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Mr De Wet, I want to put it to you that you fabricate and you are making this up.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="715">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, that is what the Advocate says, my opinion is that it is the truth and that is how I knew Mr Barnard.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="716">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Just as you made up the evidence about seeing this gas bottle bomb at Koesterfontein.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="717">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Mr Chairperson, I do not agree with that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="718">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Did Mr Barnard ever give you any orders?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="719">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="720">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Did anyone give you orders to plant bombs?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="721">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="722">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Who was that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="723">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Nico Prinsloo and Leon van der Merwe.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="724">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Where is Nico Prinsloo today?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="725">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I do not know where he works at all Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="726">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Is he still a member of the AWB?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="727">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I do not know.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="728">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Are you a member of the AWB?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="729">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>At this stage, no, not at all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="730">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Why not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="731">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I am in prison and I do not mean anything for the AWB.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="732">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Do you believe they have abandoned you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="733">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No, I would not say that they have abandoned me, there are some AWB members who still visit me in prison.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="734">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Has the leader ever come to visit you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="735">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he has.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="736">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Has he ever admitted that the AWB was responsible for planting those bombs?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="737">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Chairperson, in prison he at various times admitted that his Generals deserted him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="738">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Sir, that is not an answer to the question.  My question is did Mr Terreblanche say to you directly that he and the AWB is responsible for the bombs that were planted?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="739">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="740">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Why did you never ask Mr Barnard whether he is the one who planted the bomb at Bree Street?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="741">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, I assumed that it was him and the group at Koesterfontein who made the bomb, I never asked him personally.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="742">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>My question to you is why did you not ask him?  You know him well from Headquarters?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="743">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I did not ask him Chairperson.  I do not have a reason why I did not ask him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="744">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Because you never really knew who had planted that bomb, did you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="745">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I knew who planted the bomb in Bree Street after I was at Koesterfontein.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="746">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>You knew or you had a suspicion?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="747">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I had a very good suspicion from what I saw at Koesterfontein, and I accepted it was them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="748">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>But did you know whether Mr Barnard was acting on orders of the AWB or whether this was his own adventure?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="749">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, I accepted that it was instructions from the AWB Head Office and that he wouldn&#039;t have done things on his own because General Nico Prinsloo and the people who were at the game farm, they knew about this.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="750">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Therefore I accepted that it carried the approval of the AWB, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="751">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>When on the game farm did somebody say that the AWB gave the order for the Bree Street bombing?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="752">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>At the game farm those words were never spoken Chairperson, the fact that the AWB gave the instruction.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="753">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I accepted it because Nico Prinsloo and Leon van der Merwe was there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="754">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>But they weren&#039;t at Koesterfontein, were they?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="755">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>They weren&#039;t there as far as I know Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="756">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>When you went back to the game farm, did you tell anybody that you had seen Barnard and others making a bomb?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="757">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I spoke to Nico Prinsloo about it Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="758">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Did you tell anybody else?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="759">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Not that I can remember Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="760">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Why would you want to tell General Prinsloo about this bomb?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="761">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Because I made my vehicle available to Prinsloo, I asked him about the vehicles that he promised Barnard.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="762">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>But why?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="763">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I made mine available.  To me he was the General present there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="764">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>What was your motivation for telling him, just tell us?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="765">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Please repeat?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="766">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Why did you tell General Prinsloo about the bomb at Koesterfontein, what was your reason?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="767">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Because I accepted that it was the AWB who was responsible for it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="768">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>But why tell him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="769">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Because we were busy with a freedom struggle.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="770">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Why tell him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="771">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>He was there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="772">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Don&#039;t you think General Prinsloo would have known about it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="773">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Most probably yes, he would have known about it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="774">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Why did you tell him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="775">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I do not know Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="776">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Why didn&#039;t you tell the other people on the farm?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="777">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>It was not an instruction that what you see and hear you should convey to other people, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="778">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Did Mr Barnard tell you that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="779">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="780">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr De Wet, after the bomb exploded, wasn&#039;t there talk at the base camp and said we succeeded, we made the bomb explode and the battle has started?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="781">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>There was no question of talk about the Bree Street bomb, only talk about the  pipe bombs and the Germiston, only after that there were talk about the bombs at the base.  Before that, not at all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="782">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did you whisper this or did you talk about it in the open?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="783">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>After the Germiston bomb and the pipe bomb missions, we openly talked about it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="784">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Mr De Wet, you say you saw on television that there had been a bomb in Bree Street, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="785">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="786">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Where was the television set?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="787">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Inside the place where we lived Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="788">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Is that at the game farm?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="789">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>At the game farm, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="790">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>What did the people say when they saw this on television?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="791">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>The feeling was that the war had started.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="792">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Was there any discussion about who might have been responsible?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="793">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>We asked each other I wonder who did it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="794">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>But you knew by then?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="795">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No, I did not know at that stage.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="796">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>When did you find out?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="797">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Only the evening I went to Koesterfontein, then I assumed that it was them who were involved in this.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="798">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>What time did you see the news, was it on television?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="799">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it was on television.  Seven o&#039;clock or eight o&#039;clock on television.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="800">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Did you then go to Koesterfontein after that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="801">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>The evening if I remember correctly, between eight o&#039;clock and ten o&#039;clock, that is when I went to Koesterfontein.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="802">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>You see it on television, you see people making a bomb at Koesterfontein, why didn&#039;t you ask Mr Barnard, the person you know well, do you know anything about that bomb in Bree Street?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="803">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I did not ask questions at all and I cannot give a reason why I didn&#039;t ask questions either.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="804">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Were you scared of Mr Barnard?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="805">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="806">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Were you told at some stage that you must not ask questions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="807">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, when you are in a war situation, there are times when you do not ask questions, you just do as you are told.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="808">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>But were you told not to ask questions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="809">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>In the training that I have had, I was taught that Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="810">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>On the television, or rather let me ask you this, how many times did you see a report about the Bree Street bomb on Sunday night?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="811">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, if I can remember correctly it was on the news twice, about seven/eight o&#039;clock news and also later that evening, it was on CNN.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="812">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Did you hear that night that the BKA accepted responsibility for the bomb?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="813">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="814">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Did you know who the BKA were?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="815">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="816">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Who were they?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="817">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>It was an organisation of which Constand Viljoen was the leader and other right wing parties such as Mr  Terreblanche, Ferdi Hartzenberg, Agricultural Unions as well as the Mining Unions, they all belonged to it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="818">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	What the objective of the organisation was, I do not know.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="819">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Wasn&#039;t it meant to protect the farms, the farming areas?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="820">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Please repeat?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="821">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Was it not meant to protect the farms in the area?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="822">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I do not know if that was the purpose.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="823">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Did you ever attend any meetings of the BKA?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="824">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="825">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Did the BKA have its own constitution?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="826">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I do not know Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="827">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Did you ask anybody whether they knew what the BKA was doing, seeing that they have accepted responsibility for this bomb?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="828">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Mr Chairperson, I didn&#039;t ask anyone.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="829">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>You have already mentioned another organisation called Boere Ordevolk, is that right?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="830">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="831">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Is it led by Mr Piet Rudolph?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="832">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="833">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Does it have its own constitution?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="834">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Certain points of his constitution is the same as the AWB, because we all wanted to get our own Volkstaat.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="835">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>But it is a separate organisation from the AWB, isn&#039;t it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="836">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="837">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>The BKA was also separate from the AWB, wasn&#039;t it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="838">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>It had to be but it was still part of the AWB for me, because Terreblanche was involved with it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="839">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>All right.  Was the Freedom Front part of the Volksfront?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="840">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Was the Freedom Front part of the Volksfront?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="841">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Yes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="842">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Mr Chairperson, it was a group that splintered away from the Volksfront.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="843">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>So are you saying that when the BKA commits an act, it is actually the AWB who is committing that act?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="844">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson, I do not say that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="845">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Is it not possible Mr De Wet, that Mr Barnard could have been a member of the BKA?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="846">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>It is possible Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="847">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Likewise Mr Le Roux, Ettiene le Roux?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="848">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>It is possible Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="849">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>And this might have been a small cell of people at Koesterfontein making bombs on behalf of BKA?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="850">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>If you make the statement that way, I must accept that all the Officers who were at the game farm, must also have been part of the BKA.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="851">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>It is possible, isn&#039;t it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="852">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>It is possible Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="853">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>This may have nothing to do with the AWB at all, this bombing campaign?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="854">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No, I wouldn&#039;t say that because all of us who were there, we gathered together there for the AWB, we did not belong to any other organisations, I didn&#039;t belong to other organisations.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="855">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>You can only talk for yourself?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="856">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="857">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Assuming it was the BKA who planted that bomb in Bree Street, do you associate yourself with what the BKA did?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="858">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="859">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>I understand that your amnesty application is based on a belief that that bomb was planted in support of the AWB&#039;s political struggle, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="860">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="861">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Do you know what struggle the BKA was involved in?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="862">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="863">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Mr De Wet, at the time that you went to Ventersdorp to find out what the instructions were, did you at that stage have any idea as to whether or not you would get a Volkstaat, did you believe that there was still a chance that that might happen?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="864">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, if you looked at the politics at that stage, the chances for us to obtain a Volkstaat, was impossible.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="865">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Mr De Wet, so did you understand at that stage that the only way to get a Volkstaat, was by way of violence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="866">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson, to wage a war.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="867">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>What form would this war take?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="868">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>By planting bombs, by taking up weapon and to shoot for what you want.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="869">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>In connection with the Germiston bomb, what was the motive behind planting that particular bomb in that area where it was planted?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="870">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>To stop the election and to stop chaos.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="871">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>What would you achieve by stopping the election?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="872">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Then there would have been further negotiations with the National Party for a Volkstaat.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="873">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>But you knew by that stage that you weren&#039;t going to get one, were you not convinced that no matter what you did ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="874">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>You asked me what we wanted to achieve by it and I told you what we wanted to achieve.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="875">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Mr De Wet, let me ask you this.  By the time you planted that first bomb, did you believe that you could stop the election?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="876">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="877">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Did you want people to rise up and oppose the government?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="878">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="879">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>How was that going to come about?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="880">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Because of the chaos in the country and the bomb explosions and the people who do not go to the voting polls Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="881">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>When people were arrested, the people at the shooting range, or wherever, did you then think that the election could still be stopped?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="882">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson, the arrests which took place made or ensured that the elections would be successful.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="883">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But did you realise that the elections could not be stopped when the arrests were made?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="884">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, if they weren&#039;t all arrested at the shooting range, the group who was involved, there would still have been acts committed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="885">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But the question is, you heard the people were arrested at the shooting range, did you then realise that the election cannot be stopped?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="886">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson, I did not realise it then because I still believed that the other people who were still in the area in the Western Transvaal, that their actions or plans would also help.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="887">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>When did you realise that the elections could not be stopped?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="888">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>After the election took place and nothing else happened Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="889">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Mr De Wet, getting back to what we were dealing with, if the elections didn&#039;t take place, who would revolt, who would take part in this revolution, would it be black people who would be revolting so that they can ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="890">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson, it would have been the people who reconciled themselves with the Volkstaat idea.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="891">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>How were they going to revolt, can you describe what you anticipated would happen?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="892">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, because bombs were already exploding before the elections and at meetings and marches which were held in towns, I believed by means of that, people would have started revolting.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="893">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>So people would be leaving their houses in Primrose and in Homestead in Germiston after this bomb, and because they can&#039;t vote, and what would they be doing in the streets?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="894">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is how I saw it Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="895">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>What will they be doing, what will they do?  Will they march up and down the streets?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="896">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Submissions would have been made to the government of the day and I believe if a bomb exploded, Terreblanche would have said to the government, if you do not listen to us, there will be another bomb, and there will be a bigger one and that is how I saw it at that stage.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="897">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Is this something which you understood from Mr Terreblanche&#039;s statements that this is what he intended doing?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="898">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, with his speeches he made on stage, this is how I understood it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="899">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>For how many years were you Mr Terreblanche&#039;s bodyguard?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="900">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>For the six months that I was in Ventersdorp I was personal bodyguard, and I accompanied him everywhere.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="901">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	In the Ystergarde you are both a bodyguard and instructor and when I was in his area, I would have been his bodyguard.  That is in the six months that I was in Ventersdorp.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="902">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>When did you first attend a meeting addressed by Mr Terreblanche, was it years ago?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="903">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>From the very first meeting I can remember was in the early 1980&#039;s, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="904">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Was he then talking about war?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="905">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="906">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>That was at the time of P.W. Botha?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="907">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>It was still in P.W. Botha&#039;s time, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="908">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>And then when Frederick took over, he then also talked about war against Mr De Klerk?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="909">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="910">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Terreblanche just talks about war all the time, doesn&#039;t he?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="911">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="912">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>It is a lot of hot air, isn&#039;t it, this war that he keeps talking about?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="913">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>In his speeches people got whipped up.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="914">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Mr De Wet, you are obviously an intelligent person, didn&#039;t you understand that this is a man who talks about war ten years ago and ten years on, he is still talking about this war that never takes place?  Isn&#039;t that so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="915">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is so Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="916">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>You didn&#039;t believe him when he spoke about war, did you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="917">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I believed that there would be a revolution, I believed that there would be a war Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="918">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>The best that he ever did, the best attempt that he ever had at war was going to Bophuthatswana on the back of bakkies and shooting at people there, isn&#039;t that so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="919">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I cannot give comment on that Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="920">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>But you know about that incident?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="921">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I carry knowledge of that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="922">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>You know that he was eventually chased out there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="923">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I do not know the circumstances that well, I do not want to testify to that Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="924">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>I want to understand how you felt.  This Bophuthatswana business happened in about February 1994, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="925">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Can you repeat the question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="926">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>The so-called invasion into Bophuthatswana happened in about February 1994?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="927">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="928">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Weren&#039;t you working full-time for Mr Terreblanche at that stage?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="929">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="930">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>What did you think of that invasion, did you think it was a success?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="931">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Sir, what I saw in TV, I can&#039;t say it was a success.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="932">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Did you after that, could you have faith in Mr Terreblanche and his organisation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="933">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes Mr Chairperson, because what happened in Bophuthatswana was not the AWB&#039;s goal or purpose, they had their own Volkstaat and Mr Mangope wanted to help them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="934">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Surely Mr De Wet, as an intelligent person, you could see that Mr Terreblanche was full of hot air and nothing more?  He never came to visit you at the game farm, did he?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="935">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is true, I also did not expect him to come and visit us because he had other tasks to do and other duties to do.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="936">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	The Generals were there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="937">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Do you know  of any other duties he performed in furtherance of this war, the revolution?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="938">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Chairperson.  At meetings he addressed the people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="939">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>This is the same speeches he was giving when P.W. Botha was in power, isn&#039;t that so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="940">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="941">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Isn&#039;t it so Mr De Wet, that ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="942">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Landman, without wanting to stop you, last week we called Mr Fourie out of order in an attempt as I understood, to cut down lengthy cross-examination unnecessary.  I am not saying your cross-examination is unnecessary, but where are we getting to with this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="943">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, if I can just move on to the next point.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="944">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I am making the point that each representative was going to deal with an incident and if he wasn&#039;t representing anybody who was interested in a particular incident, he would just go by.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="945">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="946">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t know, maybe I misunderstood the whole plan.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="947">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, it became quite difficult to do it on that basis, but I am not going to be much longer with this witness.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="948">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	The thing is he said he associated himself with the Bree Street bomb, I am not quite sure whether that entitles him to amnesty or not, but that is an issue for the Committee at a later stage.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="949">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I have just one last aspect.  Mr De Wet, do you know of an organisation or a philosophy called the Israeli Vision?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="950">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="951">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Were you part of that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="952">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="953">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, with respect, you just made mention about cross-examination, but what has the Israeli Vision got to do with all the application?  Because in all the applications they say that they did it out of some religious stand point, if it was the Israeli Vision or any other church.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="954">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I am not saying that the question cannot be asked, it could have been a relevant question, I do not know.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="955">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Then the relevance must be indicated.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="956">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>He says no, so ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="957">
			<speaker>MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, I take the point.  He said no, and I am not going to take it any further.  I have no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="958">
			<speaker>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR LANDMAN</speaker>
			<text>.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="959">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairperson.  I will get a word in.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="960">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr De Wet, just a few aspects.  How far did you get in school?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="961">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I beg your pardon?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="962">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>How far did you get in school?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="963">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;ve got matric and I qualified myself in N6.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="964">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I am sorry, I did not hear.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="965">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, I qualified matric and after school I qualified with an N6 certificate.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="966">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  You say that you were at the mine just before you took a package.  What type of work did you do at the mines?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="967">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I was an electrician.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="968">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>Did you know anything about explosives?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="969">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="970">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>Did you deal with any explosives?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="971">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No, at the mine where I worked I only saw some of the explosives around there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="972">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>Did you know about the dangers of explosives?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="973">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="974">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>Koper Myburgh, what rank did he have within the Ystergarde?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="975">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>In the Ystergarde, if I can remember correctly, he was a Lieutenant.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="976">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>So you had a higher rank than him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="977">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is true.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="978">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>Was it Koper Myburgh who arrived at the game farm and specifically asked for you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="979">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="980">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>If you will just give me a moment Mr Chairperson.  You see paragraph 17, page 77 you say specifically on the 23rd of April, Koper Myburgh arrived at the game farm and he asked me to go to his father&#039;s farm in Koesterfontein?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="981">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That was after I was called into the meeting where they asked me if I wanted to join him in going to Koesterfontein.  Maybe I did not put it correctly.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="982">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>So it was not Koper Myburgh who requested you specifically?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="983">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No, they asked me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="984">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>This war to which you at various times refer to, when would this have started?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="985">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Sir, when we gathered at the game farm, after we left the women, we accepted that the war started.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="986">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	When I arrived at Leon van der Merwe, he said it was war now, it was the 21st and the 22nd of April.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="987">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>So before that there was no war?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="988">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No, there was a run up to the revolution, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="989">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>The war started on the 21st/22nd and not before that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="990">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No, not before that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="991">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>You said that you are willing to give you life?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="992">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="993">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>For that which you believed in?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="994">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>For God, country and nation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="995">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>That is now the third time that you use those words, but you are not willing to give your vehicle?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="996">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I made my vehicle available.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="997">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>No Sir, you made it conditionally available.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="998">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>If I am not the driver, I will not give my vehicle, because I do not know what they will use my vehicle for.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="999">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>But you will give your life?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1000">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I would.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1001">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>This coalition that you refer to in paragraph 7 of your application, this Afrikaans Volksfront, if I may use the word, is that the vehicle of Constand Viljoen?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1002">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Please repeat.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1003">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>This Afrikaner Volksfront in paragraph 7, was this the party or Constand Viljoen, was he part of that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1004">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he was.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1005">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>And I accept that you believed that with General Constand Viljoen&#039;s people you would have been able to succeed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1006">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1007">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>If I understand Constand Viljoen correctly, he said that he will take part in the elections at about the 12th of March 1994?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1008">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>He made the decision at that time, he took part in the election on the 27th of April?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1009">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I accept that but on the 12th of March he said I will not go into a war, but I will take part in the election, is that correct if I put it that way?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1010">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I agree, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1011">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>That was already the 12th of March when Viljoen decided not to take part in the war?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1012">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I do not know if he decided that completely, I cannot answer for him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1013">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>But Sir, it was very clear, there were boards up various parties that would take part and amongst them, Viljoen&#039;s party of the Freedom Front was also up.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1014">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, when we gathered in Pretoria, all the right wing people said that we will not vote and I believed that Mr Constand Viljoen would also not vote because he was part of the meeting.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1015">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did you know that he was going to take part in the elections?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1016">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>He talked about him taking part in the elections, but what was said there at the meeting, this is my personal opinion, at that stage that he had a hidden agenda with that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1017">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>When did you find out that he was going to take part in the elections?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1018">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I cannot say.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1019">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Was it before the march up or after?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1020">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I would say it was before the march to Ventersdorp, when the people were called up to go there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1021">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>You accept that approximately the 12th of March Viljoen would have decided to take part in the election?  When was the meeting in the Skilpad Hall?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1022">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That was in January/February 1994.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1023">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>So the talk about war was before the 12th of March?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1024">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, as I said already the run up to the election, things took place before that and talk about war, occurred before that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1025">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>But the person who would give you the most support, withdrew?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1026">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>It was not the impression that I got, that he would completely withdraw.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1027">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>In other words in the Western Transvaal, Constand Viljoen did not tie any placard against a pole for the election?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1028">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>For me it was a set, a plan, it was a hidden agenda.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1029">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>If I understand Mr Fourie correctly on Friday, you went to the game farm in order to protect the borders of the Volkstaat, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1030">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes Mr Chairperson, that is how he gave evidence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1031">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>Do you agree with what he testified?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1032">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No, I do not agree with him.  There are certain things I do not agree with.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1033">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>So why did you go to the game farm?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1034">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Because they told me that it is a war and you do not only protect the Western Transvaal&#039;s borders, you protect the whole country.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1035">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr De Wet, surely on the 27th of April 1994 it was then not a set or a plan, you had to realise that they were going to take part in the elections?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1036">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1037">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>When did you realise that he is telling the truth, that he is going to take part in the elections?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1038">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Sir, I cannot say when I realised this, but it was after I was arrested that I realised that Mr Constand Viljoen did take part in the elections.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1039">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>When were you arrested?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1040">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>It was two, three months after the 27th.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1041">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But on the 27th you had to have realised that he is taking part in the elections?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1042">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, on the 27th, when they arrested the people at the shooting range, I started fleeing, I was on the run because our people were arrested.  For a few days I did not watch the news, I cannot say what happened there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1043">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>Just to follow up on the question of the Chairperson.  During the period of the 12th of March up to the elections, did you have a television in your house, did you buy a newspaper?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1044">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Mr Chairperson, I did not have a television and I was also not a person who read newspapers.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1045">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>Were you also part of the HNP?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1046">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1047">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>You say that the war was declared around the 21st or the 22nd of April 1994?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1048">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, they said that we are going to make war.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1049">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>Who chose the target in Germiston?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1050">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I do not know.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1051">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>Did you discuss it at any time with your fellow men?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1052">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No, I was only at Koesterfontein the evening, and the next afternoon ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1053">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>Did you ever discuss things or talked to each other at Koesterfontein?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1054">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I was not at Koesterfontein, I only went to go and drop off the pipe bombs.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1055">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>And then you went back the next morning?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1056">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, to go and get the trailer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1057">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>And didn&#039;t you talk with your fellow soldiers?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1058">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No, the morning we got the instructions that this is going to Germiston and how we must transport this trailer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1059">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>Sir, did you see the bomb in the trailer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1060">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1061">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>At what stage did you see the gas burner?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1062">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>The evening when I was at Koesterfontein, it was on a table and explosives were stuck around it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1063">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>The next morning, where was that explosive and gas bottle?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1064">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I do not know, I was not in the building again.  I got Mr Le Roux&#039;s vehicle with a trailer along the road.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1065">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>Are you saying now that you did not know what was in the trailer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1066">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>They said there to me that the bomb was in the trailer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1067">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>And didn&#039;t you receive any further instructions to put sand in the trailer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1068">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Before I got there, they were busy to load sand into the trailer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1069">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>How do you know that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1070">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Because I saw it Mr Chairman,  when I got there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1071">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>In other words, you did see the trailer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1072">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1073">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>What did you see?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1074">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>There was sand on top of the gas bottle, I did not see it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1075">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>Did you see the sand?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1076">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1077">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Inside the trailer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1078">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, inside the trailer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1079">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Was it only sand that you saw inside the trailer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1080">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I only saw the sand, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1081">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>What type of bomb would you take to Germiston?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1082">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I accepted that it was the gas bottle bomb.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1083">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>So you knew how big that bomb would be?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1084">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1085">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>Was the trailer not full?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1086">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it was full of soil.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1087">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>Sir, what I cannot understand is why did four of you have to drive through?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1088">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I was the driver of my vehicle.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1089">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>That is acceptable.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1090">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>And the person who drove with me, had to detonate the bomb.  The vehicle in front could have one or two, it would be the guide vehicle.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1091">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>Why did that vehicle have to have two people?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1092">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>It could have been one, I do not know why there were two.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1093">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>Did you see what damage that Germiston bomb did?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1094">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Only that which I saw on television, and also the photographs that were at the court case.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1095">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>So you saw what damage that bomb did?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1096">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1097">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>When you unhooked the trailer, who were with you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1098">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Johan Vlok.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1099">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>Did you not at that stage tell Vlok that we are now at a taxi rank, we must not detonate the bomb here?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1100">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No, I did not say that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1101">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>Were you happy with the choice of the target?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1102">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>We were told that they will tell us where we must detonate the bomb, and I kept with the order that was given.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1103">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>You just executed the orders?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1104">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>The only difference was that the vehicle said that the bomb must be detonated here, all that I did was drove around the block and parked in the parking lot, and that was the order.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1105">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>And there were a lot of people and taxi&#039;s?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1106">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, there were taxi&#039;s.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1107">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>Not a lot of people?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1108">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1109">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>Do you know how many people were killed in the Germiston bombing?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1110">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>They talk about 10 people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1111">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>And in the court case, did you find out how big that bomb was?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1112">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>They talked about 100 kilograms, if I can remember correctly, 100 kilograms of explosives.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1113">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>100 Kilograms of explosives?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1114">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, they said the bomb was 100 kilograms.  I do not know what they meant by 100 kilograms.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1115">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>Did you realise how big that bomb was that bodies were thrown up to the ten storey building?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1116">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes Mr Chairperson, I heard that in the court case.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1117">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>Sir, your application in the AWB, you said that you have to be an Afrikaner and a Christian?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1118">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1119">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>Was that the action of an Afrikaner and a Christian?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1120">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Chairperson, I was in a war situation and everything that I had to achieve, I see that as a Christian way.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1121">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>In other words that bomb is within that parameter?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1122">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is true.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1123">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>You said earlier on to Mr Landman, that you are currently not a member of the AWB because you are of no use to them?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1124">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1125">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>And if you do get amnesty, will you again join the AWB?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1126">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Sir, at this stage I do not want to involve myself with any politics, I just want to continue with my life.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1127">
			<speaker>MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1128">
			<speaker>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR KRIEL</speaker>
			<text>.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1129">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>Sir, listening to you I must at the outset tell you that, I am asking myself if you are telling us the whole truth as you know it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1130">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Tell me Sir, ordinarily who do you expect to get the instructions from if you go out on any operation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1131">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, that it would carry the approval of the leader of the AWB and Staff Generals and the Officers above me, it should carry their approval.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1132">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>And Sir, is it correct that as a trained soldier you expected things to be done in an orderly fashion, you knew that if actions are to be carried out, there will be specific cells or groups for that purpose and things would be done in an orderly fashion, didn&#039;t you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1133">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1134">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>Now, talking about the Germiston bomb, did you belong to any cell or any group that was responsible for any operations?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1135">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I belonged to the AWB at that stage Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1136">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>Sir, the impression I have is that even within the AWB and further within the Ystergarde, somebody seems to have been appointed at some stage, to be in charge of the operations unit, is that impression correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1137">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson, there were people who were appointed to do certain tasks.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1138">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>Now my question to you is, did you belong to any of these special operation units?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1139">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Mr Chairperson, I was only a member of the group who gathered together at the game farm and part of the bomb missions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1140">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>And just to understand you further, are you saying that as far as the Germiston bomb is concerned, it was by mere chance, you collided into it, you didn&#039;t know about its planning, hardly did you know that it was going to be there in the first place, you just happened to be called there to make your motor vehicle available and there you were, finding yourself in Germiston on such a big mission?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1141">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson, of the planning of that bomb, I knew nothing.  Koekemoer who was involved in court, he testified that I helped building the bomb, but that is a lie, I did not help in building the bomb at all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1142">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>On the way to Germiston, did you know what you were transporting?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1143">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I was told it was going to be a bomb which should be planted in Germiston.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1144">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>Sir, you say that when you were in Germiston, you realised that this was a black taxi rank?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1145">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, all that I saw when I arrived in Germiston was that it was a taxi stand and that there were buildings around it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1146">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>Is it then your evidence that you didn&#039;t know that this was a black taxi rank?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1147">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson, there were black people, I can tell you that.  I do not know if there were other people, there were whites present as well.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1148">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>Okay, talking about the war and be mindful of the fact that you are a trained soldier.  Did you have any targets in your war?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1149">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson, we did not have specific targets.  I wasn&#039;t told that we had specific targets.  The fact was that the elections had to be stopped at all costs.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1150">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>Talking about the bombs that came before you could move over to Ventersdorp and therefore let&#039;s say, talk about the bomb on the 23rd/24th, before then, the other bombs that had gone off, were you aware of what the policy of the AWB was regarding the planing of these bombs, with particular reference to who would be the target?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1151">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, what I did know was that the targets which were pointed out at that stage, was NP offices as well as ANC offices.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1152">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>It seems to me Sir, correct me if I am wrong, going by the report that has been distributed here where Mr Terreblanche was talking about more bombs are coming, if one looks at that report, it seems to me that even if one was to talk about the bombs in Lichtenburg and Leeudoringstad, these were directed at specific targets like an electrical pylon apparently and Leeudoring one, directed at the railway line.  Isn&#039;t it that you had a specific pattern of going about identifying your targets as the AWB?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1153">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, what the planning was, I do not know.  I do not know if they had deliberate targets, but what I did know was that NP and ANC offices were bombed at that stage.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1154">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>Let me put it differently, up to the time that you moved over to Ventersdorp, the impression I have here, and please tell me if this is not also  your impression, is that you were targeting things like offices, power stations, railway lines, government things or political things if one may put it in those terms, is that impression correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1155">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1156">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>And Sir, all the meetings that you attended, where Mr Terreblanche amongst others talked, did any of them say to you that there is now a change in the attitude of the choice of targets?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1157">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Mr Chairperson, it was never put to me in that way.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1158">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>In fact nobody ever said to you that now it is time that innocent civilians must be killed otherwise you would have long told us about it?  Did anybody say that to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1159">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson, nobody told me to go and kill innocent people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1160">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>And Sir, as a trained soldier, I think it is pretty obvious to you that when you are involved in a war situation, you don&#039;t go about killing innocent civilians, am I correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1161">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, what I learnt from waging a war is that innocent people too die in a war situation - people who are not interested in politics.  It doesn&#039;t matter what country&#039;s war this is.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1162">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Innocent people do get killed.  But nobody actually told me to go and kill innocent people, those were just the circumstances.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1163">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  If innocent civilians get caught in the cross-fire, it seems to me that that is unfortunate, but they are not really the target, isn&#039;t that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1164">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Mr Chairperson, they are not the target but they were there by coincidence, caught up in the cross-fire.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1165">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>Let&#039;s talk now about the Germiston bomb.  Who was the target?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1166">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, I do not know of any target, I was only told to go and plant the bomb there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1167">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>By the way, why do you say you moved to Ventersdorp, I understand it was a call up, but what was your understanding, why did you have to move to Ventersdorp?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1168">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, the first time I went there was when I went to work there, I took a package from my job, otherwise I would have lost it because of Affirmative Action.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1169">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>No, I mean around the 20th or 21st of April?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1170">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Brigadier Leon van der Merwe called me up with regards to what was discussed at the Trim Park on the previous occasion.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1171">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>You say that you did not know what was the purpose of being called up to Ventersdorp?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1172">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>At that stage, I did not know the purpose.  I only learnt that on the 21st/22nd, then I found out why people were specifically called up to Ventersdorp.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1173">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>Sir, now that we know that the Ystergarde seems to have been the elite group within the AWB, would it be fair to say that a member of the Ystergarde would then reasonably be expected to know what the AWB stands for and what is being planned, at least the Officers have to know what is being planned Sir?  Would it be fair?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1174">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1175">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>Would it then be fair to say that the Officers who belonged to the elite, being the Ystergarde, would reasonably not be expected to know what is being planned?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1176">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, the Ystergarde was there for personal protection, they were not there to know what was being discussed between Mr Terreblanche and his Generals.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1177">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>In fact, if action was to be taken would it, I am talking about now not defensive action but to go on the attack, if action was to be taken, would it be the Ystergarde to do it or would it be the Wenkommando, or who would do it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1178">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I believe the Ystergarde would have received the instructions for attacking.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1179">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>Did the Ystergarde ever get such instructions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1180">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Not that I know of Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1181">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>And Sir, talking about you driving your motor vehicle to Germiston, why did you make it a condition that if your car is to be made available, the condition would be that you must be the driver?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1182">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, a vehicle when you work, a vehicle is the only way of transport from and to work and it is a very important thing.  You cannot, in the Western Transvaal you cannot walk.  The towns are far apart.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1183">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr (indistinct) is has been said that cars are the toys of men, and they protect it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1184">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>But Sir, isn&#039;t it that you were prepared to lose all your possessions if need be, including your life for the struggle?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1185">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson, I was prepared to give my life, but my vehicle, I had my wife and children, and they needed a vehicle if they wanted to move from point A to point B.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1186">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>Okay, going back to the Germiston bomb.  Who gave you the instructions that you must go and place this bomb at Germiston?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1187">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That was the morning  when I was at Koesterfontein, and Mr Barnard told us that the bomb was going to Germiston.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1188">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>Did the members of the Ystergarde wear uniform?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1189">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, when we got together for the war, we didn&#039;t wear our uniforms at all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1190">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>Let&#039;s talk about before the war, or before you move ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1191">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Before the war we did wear uniforms, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1192">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>Did you ever see Mr Barnard wearing a uniform to show that he belongs to you, the Ystergarde?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1193">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, Mr Barnard&#039;s hair was long and because of that, he wasn&#039;t allowed to wear the Ystergarde uniform, but I did see him in the camouflage uniform of the Wenkommando.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1194">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>You saw him in uniform of the Wenkommando?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1195">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1196">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>And being a member of the Ystergarde and having some basic understanding of the chain of command within the Ystergarde, isn&#039;t it that you expected that if instructions were to come to you about operations, they have to come within the line of command within your structure, the Ystergarde, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1197">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Please repeat the question?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1198">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>I am saying if instructions were to be given to you regarding operations that you were to go out on, you would expect that whoever gives you instructions, has to be somebody within the Ystergarde, not the Wenkommando, is that not so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1199">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1200">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>So far as the Ystergarde is concerned, you cannot say what was Barnard in it, correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1201">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, my view of Barnard - we concluded our course together in the Ystergarde, so he was a member of the Ystergarde, and if I remember he completed it successfully, so he must have been a Captain within the Ystergarde.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1202">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>Did he ever wear any badge to show his rank?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1203">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, in the Wenkommando he carried the rank of Colonel.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1204">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>No, not in the Wenkommando, in the Ystergarde?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1205">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I already said in the Ystergarde Barnard did not wear the Ystergarde uniform because of his long hair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1206">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>Am I then correct to say that you did not know what his rank would be within the Ystergarde?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1207">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson, as far as I was concerned Barnard was a Captain within the Ystergarde.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1208">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>You say that before this pre-election bombs, you were told to forget about the ranks?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1209">
			<speaker>INTERPRETER</speaker>
			<text>Could the speaker please repeat the question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1210">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Can you just repeat your question, please Sir?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1211">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>Did you say that before these pre-election bombings, you were told to forget about the ranks?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1212">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>When we went to Leon van der Merwe, his house, he said that we will not have ranks any more because we are going to the war situation, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1213">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>And you are saying that this did not mean that the ranks didn&#039;t exist, all that was being said was that you didn&#039;t have to mention them any more?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1214">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I said that when in public we act, or in a war situation where we are amongst people, we are not allowed to address him as Colonel or Major, whatever, you must address him by his name.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1215">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>Because I want to suggest to you that to the extent that I may believe you when you say that Mr Barnard told you to take the bomb to Germiston,  I want to suggest that he was on a frolic of his own.  He together with the small grouping that you say you saw at Koesterfontein, where the majority of the people were not, that little group were on a frolic of their own, and you became part of it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1216">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, I cannot say that because after I spoke to General Nico Prinsloo and also Brigadier Leon van der Merwe, and the instructions we got from the pipe bomb missions, if it did not have the approval of the AWB, I do not think it would have happened.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1217">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did it have the approval of the AWB?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1218">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I beg your pardon?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1219">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did the whole operation have the approval of the AWB?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1220">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I accepted it because the Generals were with us at the base.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1221">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>Sir, look, but if we talk about Koesterfontein, did you see any General there?  When you went to pick up the bombs and drop it at Germiston, were any of the Generals there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1222">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, if Mr Barnard asked General Prinsloo that must be stolen, where are the vehicles that must be made available, then I believe that they did know what was going on at Koesterfontein.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1223">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>This is but your own conclusion?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1224">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is my own conclusion.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1225">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>If you had known that the bomb in Germiston would kill so many people and injure so many, would you still have planted it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1226">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, I was in a war situation and irrespective of how many people died, I cannot say if there were more or less people who died, I cannot say if I would have associated myself or not, I was part of the group and I associated myself with what occurred.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1227">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>Look Sir, I can see that you are at pains to always stress about how you associated yourself with everything that took place, but for me there is a clear distinction between associating and something that you knew you would have done beforehand.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1228">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Out of my own I would not have done it.  If I as an individual or if I did not belong to an organisation, I would not have done it and if I was not in a war situation, I also would not have done it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1229">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>Because I am suggesting further that when you wage war, you don&#039;t make innocent civilians your target and to the extent that you and your group went about it in that fashion, I suggest that it could not have been a legitimate war, you are fighting the innocent civilians?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1230">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, for me it was war and the instructions I received, I executed them as far as I could.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1231">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>I am not sure if I understand you well, do you agree with my submission that the way things turned out to be, this could not be justified under any circumstances?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1232">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No, I do not agree with what you say.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1233">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>Are you saying that for you to get the Volkstaat, you regarded it as perfectly legitimate for you to go about killing and maiming innocent civilians?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1234">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Mr Chairperson, it was not the idea to kill innocent people, we were in a war situation and some people die within the cross-fire.  I will not say that they were the target.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1235">
			<speaker>MR MALAN</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;ve got a problem with this idea that you talk about innocent and people in cross-fire, or people in the cross-fire.  For someone to be in a cross-fire, there must be a target?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1236">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, that morning at Koesterfontein, they told me that the bomb would go to Germiston.  Where the bomb had to be planted, at that stage, I did not know.  I did not know the Germiston area, so I cannot say that it had a target or there was a target, or specific targets were appointed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1237">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	For me, the election had to be stopped at all costs and I did not know where to place the bomb.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1238">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And you just executed orders or followed orders?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1239">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1240">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Without asking any questions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1241">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Because we were in a war situation Mr Chairman, I did not question it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1242">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Could you question it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1243">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I could if I wanted, but at that stage I did not think about questioning it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1244">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>Sir you are saying that you did not know then what was the target.  Let me put it this way, if it was to be found that the real target was the black people or the black commuters at the taxi rank, would you still associate yourself with what took place?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1245">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, if it was an instruction, I would have done it, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1246">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>No, no, I understand the question of instructions.  I understand the question of instructions, it seems to me you are arguing or submitting that if you get an instruction, you simply have to comply with them, correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1247">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, if I had to give the command and if I had to do it by myself, I would not have planted the bomb at a taxi rank.  If that is what your question was.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1248">
			<speaker>MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;ve got no further questions, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1249">
			<speaker>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR SINJATSI</speaker>
			<text>.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1250">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR BRACHER</speaker>
			<text>Mr De Wet, you are a new kind of guerrilla to me, you fought volk and father land, but not the motor vehicle, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1251">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, for God and the father land, that is correct, but not the vehicle, my vehicle has got nothing to do with that.  For me it was my God, my father land and my nation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1252">
			<speaker>MR BRACHER</speaker>
			<text>I am not joking Mr De Wet, it seems to me your evidence comes down to this, that you wanted to drive your vehicle, because you wanted to preserve it for your family if something happened to you, and that if General anything had said to you, we want to use your vehicle for a bomb, you would have said no, because this is your precious car?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1253">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, when I arrived at Koesterfontein and told them that I am driving with a bomb to Germiston, I was prepared to give everything because if the car was in the back of my car and it was detonated there and the time span that available for me, I would not have time to unhook the trailer, etc.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1254">
			<speaker>MR BRACHER</speaker>
			<text>You weren&#039;t prepared to give your vehicle away, what changed over night?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1255">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I made my vehicle available Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1256">
			<speaker>MR BRACHER</speaker>
			<text>You see, we know until you got to Koesterfontein, you didn&#039;t know where you were going with that vehicle at all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1257">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, when I arrived at Koesterfontein, I was asked to go and hear from the General where is the vehicle that is available.  I went there to General Prinsloo and asked him the person is asking for the vehicle, for a specific vehicle with a tow equipment and I said we do not have such a vehicle.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1258">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	At that stage I did not know what it was for.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1259">
			<speaker>MR BRACHER</speaker>
			<text>That is precisely, you didn&#039;t know what your vehicle was needed for until you got to Koesterfontein?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1260">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1261">
			<speaker>MR BRACHER</speaker>
			<text>Except the fact that you have been to fetch pipe bombs the day before?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1262">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I picked it up that evening, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1263">
			<speaker>MR BRACHER</speaker>
			<text>You see as I understand your evidence it is this and correct me if I am wrong, because as far as I am concerned, your answers to my learned friend, have killed your amnesty application.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1264">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Nobody ever gave you instructions to kill innocent people as the target in the AWB?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1265">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Nobody gave me the instruction to kill innocent people, that is correct yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1266">
			<speaker>MR BRACHER</speaker>
			<text>Nobody in the AWB has ever accepted responsibility publicly for any of these bombings?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1267">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, in the AWB people did not take responsibility in public for this.  For me Nico Prinsloo and Leon van der Merwe were there, they were people who had direct contact with Terreblanche and it had his approval.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1268">
			<speaker>MR BRACHER</speaker>
			<text>No, you can&#039;t give that answer because you have just told me nobody told you to target innocent civilians, so you can&#039;t blame them.  You can&#039;t blame them for what you did in Germiston.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1269">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	You can&#039;t blame them for associating with Bree Street, can you?  How do you blame them?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1270">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, we were in a war situation, it was told to us that it is war and when I fight in a war, everything is made available, irrespective of what happen.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1271">
			<speaker>MR BRACHER</speaker>
			<text>You know Mr De Wet, you are like a parrot, you go through a war situation, and I must stop the election.  You had one bomb that you knew about in a trailer, and you had 20 pipe bombs, are you going to cause the stoppage of an election, and you chose a target which has nothing to do with an election, you chose innocent people.  What has, how do you justify that as anything to do with the policy of the ANC, even if it is to stop an election, it is rubbish?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1272">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, we were told that we must stop the elections, using any means available and some of them were successful, and I cannot say further.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1273">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr De Wet, in order to simplify the question, how would this bomb in Germiston in any way prevent that large, or come near to preventing that large election, that was an international microscope?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1274">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, as far as I know the chaos and damage that occurred after the bombings, would have prevented the people to go to the voting polls, and that is how I saw it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1275">
			<speaker>MR BRACHER</speaker>
			<text>Mr De Wet, if it was your intention to do something adverse to the election, you could easily have chosen a polling booth which were well known by the time you planted the bomb?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1276">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, I was not involved with the planning of what will occur in this war, I was a soldier, and I only followed my instructions, I cannot comment on that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1277">
			<speaker>MR BRACHER</speaker>
			<text>Mr De Wet, I am not accepting these answers about instructions, because you didn&#039;t get instructions from anybody to do anything, except to drive a car, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1278">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, I made my vehicle available, and nobody told me I must go and plant a bomb.  When I arrived at Koesterfontein, it was said that this bomb was going to Germiston, that in the trailer is a bomb and we are going to Germiston.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1279">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I associated myself, no one said that I must plant it there, I only associated myself when I made my motor vehicle available.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1280">
			<speaker>MR BRACHER</speaker>
			<text>But not on anybody&#039;s orders, was it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1281">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No one gave me instructions to do that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1282">
			<speaker>MR BRACHER</speaker>
			<text>You didn&#039;t know what target had been chosen?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1283">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No, I did not know what target was chosen.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1284">
			<speaker>MR BRACHER</speaker>
			<text>Have you any idea when they gave instructions how to use pipe bombs, what targets were intended for those bombs?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1285">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, with the pipe bombs they said that missions will go out and what the instructions were, I was not there.  They said they were looking for a driver and two people who would accompany this driver.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1286">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	What was said there, I cannot tell you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1287">
			<speaker>MR BRACHER</speaker>
			<text>Now, when you say you associated yourself with the Bree Street bomb, what do you associate yourself with, the killing of innocent people without instructions from above, is that what you are associating yourself with?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1288">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, we were in a war situation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1289">
			<speaker>MR BRACHER</speaker>
			<text>Here we go.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1290">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Chairperson, we were in a war situation and that which occurred there, I associated myself with.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1291">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr De Wet, you come now, arrive in Germiston, in the beginning you drive into Germiston, you do not know where this bomb will be planted?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1292">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1293">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And your colleague shows you or indicates to use your words, the orders are that the bomb must be planted here, close to this taxi rank and you say at that stage, you, yourself associated yourself with the planing of the bomb there, knowing that people will be killed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1294">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1295">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>With what political purpose, objective, did you associate yourself with that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1296">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, in order for the elections to be stopped and that the government of the day will be shown that the Boerevolk will fight for the freedom for their own Volkstaat.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1297">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>How would the people who was involved with the election, how would they have known that the bomb was planted there in order to create chaos and to disrupt the elections, because you wanted a Volkstaat?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1298">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, for me it was that the leaders who were involved, that they used the media and the radio, they would make it known to the world why and where the bombs would be planted.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1299">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The previous day was the first bomb that you thought was done by the AWB?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1300">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1301">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>If it was the AWB, we do not know.  But you thought it was them and no one in the AWB took responsibility for that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1302">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Mr Chairperson.   There was that evening, the BKA did take responsibility for that and that is all that I can remember.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1303">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What made you think that the AWB&#039;s leadership would take responsibility for the Germiston bomb?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1304">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Because we who were gathered there, were AWB members.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1305">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Bracher?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1306">
			<speaker>MR BRACHER</speaker>
			<text>You see, you said that you assumed that there was some trap that General Viljoen was setting by participating in the election, but you don&#039;t seem to have asked anybody about that?  You just assumed all these things and made up your own mind and your own plans what to do next, is that right?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1307">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1308">
			<speaker>MR BRACHER</speaker>
			<text>And the same after the Bree Street bombing, nobody takes responsibility on behalf of the AWB, they carrying on, there is war now, but nobody says a word about this is our bomb, they don&#039;t say it in Koesterfontein, they don&#039;t say it at the game farm, they don&#039;t say it in the press, they don&#039;t say it on TV that you were watching, you just assumed that this is part of the war?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1309">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, after what happened in Bree Street and the BKA took responsibility for it, I realised that Constand Viljoen and Eugene Terreblanche and Ferdi Hartzenberg and the other organisations, who belonged to the BKA would take responsibility for it.  That is how I understood it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1310">
			<speaker>MR BRACHER</speaker>
			<text>You keep saying that, but why don&#039;t you ask somebody, why don&#039;t you ask one of your Generals or one of your superiors before you go and kill some more innocent people?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1311">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, I was in a war period, and there you do not ask questions.  That is how I was trained.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1312">
			<speaker>MR BRACHER</speaker>
			<text>Is that your answer, that you don&#039;t ask any questions at all?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1313">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, I did ask questions why we fought this war and they said that they wanted to stop the elections, but I didn&#039;t ask why.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1314">
			<speaker>MR BRACHER</speaker>
			<text>Mr De Wet, my question is different, you did not know that this had anything to do with the war struggle of the AWB, because nobody had said so to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1315">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, I assumed that what happened there, carried the approval of the leaders, and that is why I associated myself with that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1316">
			<speaker>MR BRACHER</speaker>
			<text>That is the best you can do isn&#039;t it, you accepted?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1317">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1318">
			<speaker>MR BRACHER</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1319">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR BRACHER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1320">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Are you done Mr Bracher?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1321">
			<speaker>MR BRACHER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1322">
			<speaker>MR GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text>Judge, can I just clarify one thing for me.  I thought you said a few minutes ago that you thought one of the BKA Generals would take responsibility, you named Constand Viljoen, etc, is that what you said, just now?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1323">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, I only said that the people under the BKA who accepted responsibility did that because Mr Terreblanche was a member of the BKA, and that is why it carried the approval of the AWB.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1324">
			<speaker>MR GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, but again you don&#039;t seem to be making a separation between the BKA and the AWB, because you have told us that you were acting as an AWB member.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1325">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1326">
			<speaker>MR GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text>So where does the BKA and the taking of the responsibility by the BKA come into this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1327">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, the instructions with regards to the bombs, the BKA took responsibility on the news, and I</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1328">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>assumed and accepted that because Terreblanche was a member of the BKA, it would also carry away his approval as well as that of Constand Viljoen and Ferdi Hartzenberg and the other Unions who belonged to the BKA.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1329">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	But we did it on the instruction of the AWB.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1330">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1331">
			<speaker>MR PRIOR</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairperson.  Mr De Wet, just a few questions.  You were well trained in the AWB and the Wenkommando and the Ystergarde and you held a high position there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1332">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1333">
			<speaker>MR PRIOR</speaker>
			<text>You were not one of the men, one of the younger men there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1334">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1335">
			<speaker>MR PRIOR</speaker>
			<text>You were personal friends with the leader, Terreblanche?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1336">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I wouldn&#039;t say I was personally befriended with him, but I was his bodyguard.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1337">
			<speaker>MR PRIOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, you were his bodyguard, and you had contact with him on a much higher level than the other people who met him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1338">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1339">
			<speaker>MR PRIOR</speaker>
			<text>Something which bothers me a great deal is at Ventersdorp and then Koesterfontein and then at the game farm, were there never order groups where all the men were involved and told what the plans were?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1340">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson, not during the time I was there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1341">
			<speaker>MR PRIOR</speaker>
			<text>It seems to me that here at Koesterfontein was a little group who was doing their own thing, and at the game farm there was another group, doing their own thing, and later, when you all left, it was - you quickly made another bomb and quickly planted it at Jan Smuts, is that the right impression I am getting or is it incorrect?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1342">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson, I wouldn&#039;t say that.   From what I learnt from the other people, everybody was called up to go and wage a war and to protect the borders of the Volkstaat.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1343">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	The AWB&#039;s Wenkommando was gathered all over the area.  Let&#039;s say 20 000 to 30 000 people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1344">
			<speaker>MR PRIOR</speaker>
			<text>In what behaviour did they take part, this 20 000 to 30 000 people?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1345">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I do not know which instructions they received.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1346">
			<speaker>MR PRIOR</speaker>
			<text>The other problem that I&#039;ve got is around the 23rd, 24th or was it earlier, of April, you gathered together at the game farm?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1347">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>It was Friday the 22nd, or rather it was more the Saturday morning than the Friday evening.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1348">
			<speaker>MR PRIOR</speaker>
			<text>As we understand from Abe Fourie, a camp was put together, communications network was put up with Head Office, guards were positioned, there was very strong discipline?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1349">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1350">
			<speaker>MR PRIOR</speaker>
			<text>And as far as we understand, I think Nico Prinsloo, according to him, somebody who deserted would have been shot?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1351">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, I don&#039;t think it was Nico Prinsloo, I think it was Major Johan Smit who said that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1352">
			<speaker>MR PRIOR</speaker>
			<text>Whatever, then on the 24th, we have the Bree Street bomb, you know nothing about that until later that is?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1353">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1354">
			<speaker>MR PRIOR</speaker>
			<text>Then the Germiston bomb, the Monday and then all the pipe bombs on the same day?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1355">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1356">
			<speaker>MR PRIOR</speaker>
			<text>And suddenly the whole camp is dispersing, everybody is getting up and going home?  It seems they are fed up with all of this, they want to go home, they want to go their wives, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1357">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No, I wouldn&#039;t say the camp was breaking up.  Some people came and asked if they could not go and see their wives.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1358">
			<speaker>MR PRIOR</speaker>
			<text>This is after a few days?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1359">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson.  I was not willing to go home at that stage.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1360">
			<speaker>MR PRIOR</speaker>
			<text>But Mr De Wet, let&#039;s be honest here, it does not sound to me, it does not resemble an army who is very determined to fight for their country and to fight till the end, it does not resemble something like that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1361">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, the view I had at that stage and why I did not approve of the meeting, it was people who came there to fight a war and after a few days being away from their wives, they wanted to go home.  I did not approve of that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1362">
			<speaker>MR PRIOR</speaker>
			<text>Now just the last question, as Judge Flemming said, there was this very strict discipline, after a while anybody could come and go as they want.  He used the word (indistinct)?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1363">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson, even at the shooting range, there were very strong security measures in force.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1364">
			<speaker>MR PRIOR</speaker>
			<text>The targets, according to what my learned colleagues asked you, as far as the pipe bombs are concerned, would you agree and this is the acts of accusation in the High Court, the one pipe bomb was at Westonaria, Carltonville at a taxi rank where a pipe bomb was thrown, specifically where black people got their transportation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1365">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is how I understood it from the court, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1366">
			<speaker>MR PRIOR</speaker>
			<text>Then there was another one at 3rd and Park Street in Randfontein, also once again, a taxi stand.  Nobody got injured there, but yet again the target was a black taxi stand.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1367">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I do not know what the target was.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1368">
			<speaker>MR PRIOR</speaker>
			<text>I put it to you now, do you agree with me?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1369">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>You will have to look at the facts, and if I look at it, yes, it would seem the case.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1370">
			<speaker>MR PRIOR</speaker>
			<text>The Bloed Street one, 7th Avenue in Marabastad, Pretoria.  This pipe bomb was thrown at a cafe and also basically a rank where there would have been black people drinking cold drinks and sitting waiting.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1371">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I would say the majority was black, but there were definitely blacks as well.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1372">
			<speaker>MR PRIOR</speaker>
			<text>By Sannie&#039;s Cafe, Marabastad?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1373">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1374">
			<speaker>MR PRIOR</speaker>
			<text>Also Bree Street, we heard evidence that most of the victims were black people and also Germiston, do you agree?  I am making a statement?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1375">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No, I agree with your statement Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1376">
			<speaker>MR PRIOR</speaker>
			<text>And as the Chairperson asked your co-applicants, you did not choose targets in Houghton or Sandton or Sunnyside or any white area, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1377">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I was not involved with that, so I cannot say the people chose it or not.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1378">
			<speaker>MR PRIOR</speaker>
			<text>But it was never discussed that you would plant bombs or throw bombs in purely white areas?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1379">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No, it was never discussed Chairperson.  I cannot comment on that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1380">
			<speaker>MR PRIOR</speaker>
			<text>Finally, the statement that Mr Terreblanche faxed through to the Committee, I just want your comment on the last paragraph.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1381">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	He said I accept also that in the difficult time which preceded the election, I made several public speeches and that the content of my speeches by members of the AWB, they could be interpreted by AWB members as instructions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1382">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>As I already testified Chairperson, things he said from the stage, I interpreted them as instructions and I also thought that it carried away his approval.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1383">
			<speaker>MR PRIOR</speaker>
			<text>He doesn&#039;t say that it was his instructions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1384">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No, that is correct.  He does not say pertinently that we had to do it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1385">
			<speaker>MR PRIOR</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson, no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1386">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Mr De Wet, the question of double ranks I do not really understand that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1387">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	The whole question of ... </text>
		</line>
		<line number="1388">
			<speaker>INTERRUPTION IN RECORDING - POWER FAILURE</speaker>
			<text>.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1389">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MS CAMBANIS</speaker>
			<text>I know I am out of order, but I beg leave to put exactly three propositions to this person.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1390">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Sir, you escaped together with Mr Barnard, Mr Myburgh and Mr Le Roux, is that correct, after your conviction?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1391">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1392">
			<speaker>MS CAMBANIS</speaker>
			<text>Is it correct that Mr Barnard and Mr Myburgh was subsequently convicted of offences relating to further killing sprees aimed at the black population?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1393">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1394">
			<speaker>MS CAMBANIS</speaker>
			<text>Is it correct that in the subsequent killing spree, there was no mention of this being done on behalf of the AWB?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1395">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, with respect, I do not know how this applicant could answer, and with respect, I do not know what the relevance is of such incidents afterwards.  How does it have any connection with this amnesty application?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1396">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The relevance could be argued, but whether it will be accepted or not, is another matter.  If the applicant cannot answer, then he just has to say that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1397">
			<speaker>MS CAMBANIS</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, that is all.  Sorry, is it correct that there was no talk about the AWB being involved in the subsequent trial of Mr Barnard and Mr Myburgh?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1398">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson, as far as I know the people who took responsibility for it was the Boere Aanvalstroepe, the AWB did not take responsibility for that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1399">
			<speaker>MS CAMBANIS</speaker>
			<text>Just for the record, the summary of that matter appears on page 20 of Bundle A.  Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1400">
			<speaker>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MS CAMBANIS</speaker>
			<text>.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1401">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Ms Van der Walt, do you have any further questions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1402">
			<speaker>RE-EXAMINATION BY MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Mr de Wet, you were asked with regards to the instructions which you would have received to go and place the bomb in Germiston.  Who told you to take the bombs there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1403">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Nobody told me to take the bomb there, I made my vehicle ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1404">
			<speaker>INTERRUPTION IN RECORDING - POWER FAILURE</speaker>
			<text>.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1405">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>You say that you made your vehicle available and then you continued and you said something about Cliffie?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1406">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Barnard, when we were together, he called us together, he said this bomb is going to Germiston and because of the pipe bomb missions which we discussed earlier the previous evening, I reconciled myself with it and I was prepared to take the bomb to Germiston.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1407">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Now, you said you made your vehicle available.  This you said because of what General Nico Prinsloo told you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1408">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that he didn&#039;t have a vehicle for Barnard and therefore I offered him mine because it had a tow bar on it, and this was on instruction from General Nico Prinsloo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1409">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Were you specifically asked for a vehicle with a tow bar?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1410">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1411">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>And when you got back, once again you were told to take the tow bar off?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1412">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, the same person - him and Leon van der Merwe, told me that I must take the tow bar off my vehicle.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1413">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Several times you were asked with regards to the fact that on the 21st of April ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1414">
			<speaker>RECORDING INTERRUPTED - POWER FAILURE</speaker>
			<text>.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1415">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Mr de Wet, were you aware - sorry, you were asked questions with regards to the fact that on the 21st of April at Brigadier Leon van der Merwe&#039;s you were there on that date, and you went there to learn what had happened and that you would receive instructions there that there would be a war?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1416">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1417">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Before that date, were you in any sense aware of the fact that you are going to make war now?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1418">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson, Abraham Myburgh once came from Head Office, he came to pick up things at my house and then he told me, he addressed me as Oom Jan, and he said Oom Jan, it seems to me Terreblanche is going to wage war now, he called the people up to Western Transvaal.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1419">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Did you know about the call up instructions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1420">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I did Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1421">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>You also made mention of Koper Myburgh, you were asked who told you to go to Koesterfontein, that is the Sunday evening, when you picked up the pipe bombs, you said Koper Myburgh told you that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1422">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, Koper Myburgh called me and told me that General Nico Prinsloo wanted me and then he asked me to take Myburgh to Koesterfontein to go and pick up things there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1423">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>So then from there you went to a meeting, that is your evidence or rather you were called into a meeting?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1424">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1425">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Koper Myburgh was also involved in that meeting, even though you would not know that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1426">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1427">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>You were also told that you executed this operation on your own initiative, your little group, but I would refer you to Volume 2, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1428">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I refer you to Volume 2, page 7 that is the Volume in front of you, that is the charge sheet when you were on trial?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1429">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1430">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>And there in paragraph 2, the State alleged in your case that these acts were committed in order to prevent the election?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1431">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1432">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>And that is how you submitted it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1433">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is how I submitted it in that case as well Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1434">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>No further questions, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1435">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MS VAN DER WALT</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1436">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Mr De Wet, the question of double ranks confuses me, it would seem to me that there were Officers and even the leader of the AWB who sat on different chairs or who wore different hats.  Let&#039;s take Eugene Terreblanche, as far as you know, where was he involved in the capacity of a leader?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1437">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, Terreblanche, the only time he was a leader, was the time he was a leader of the AWB.  He was not the leader of any other organisation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1438">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Where was he in a leadership structure?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1439">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>The BKA, the Volksfront - that is the only three I can tell you Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1440">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>And then Mr Barnard, which hats did he wear, on which chairs did he sit on?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1441">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, in the AWB there are two facets, the AWB Wenkommando and the Ystergarde which is a special unit.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1442">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	In the Wenkommando there was a rank structure as well as in the Ystergarde.  When you had done the Ystergarde course, you either became a Lieutenant or a Captain once you have completed your course.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1443">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	That is where you find the double ranks, in the Ystergarde he was a Captain, but in the AWB&#039;s Wenkommando he was a Commandant or a Colonel, whichever the rank was.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1444">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>When Barnard would give instructions to someone, would he say I am giving you this instruction in my capacity as a Captain in the Ystergarde or in my capacity as a Colonel in the Wenkommando?  How was it channelled down?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1445">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>If he gave an instruction, it would have been as Colonel because he worked directly with Terreblanche.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1446">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>So his rank, it seemed to me that his rank within the Ystergarde didn&#039;t really matter, it confuses me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1447">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I was a Colonel myself in the AWB Wenkommando and a Captain in the Ystergarde.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1448">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	At one stage we were told to choose, either we are with the Wenkommando or the Ystergarde with regards to operations, and there I chose to stay with the Garde.  That was my need within the AWB.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1449">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Do you know what Barnard&#039;s choice was?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1450">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson, I cannot say what his choice was.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1451">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>And then one further question, Mr Barnard, maybe I didn&#039;t hear something correct along the way, but Mr Barnard, wasn&#039;t he in another organisation as well?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1452">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson, not that I know of.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1453">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chair.  Two questions really, you mentioned that you spoke to Nico Prinsloo about what you had seen at Koesterfontein and this must have been either probably on the morning of the 25th, this is right?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1454">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>It was the Sunday evening Chairperson, after I returned from Koesterfontein.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1455">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text>So Sunday evening was the 25th or the 24th, just remind me?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1456">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>The 24th Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1457">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text>What did he say to you in response?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1458">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>He didn&#039;t give me any comments when I told him what was going on there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1459">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text>He said nothing at all?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1460">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>He only asked me if I would make my vehicle available.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1461">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text>Now the people from Natal arrived on the 25th, that is correct isn&#039;t it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1462">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, when I returned from the Germiston bomb mission, the people from Natal were there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1463">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text>I asked this of one of the other applicants, and I will ask it of you.  In your opinion, isn&#039;t it strange that Nico Prinsloo didn&#039;t mention the activities of your little grouping to those people from Natal, just to motivate them and tell them that we are really going for it this time, wasn&#039;t that strange?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1464">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I wasn&#039;t involved there so whatever General Prinsloo told them, I cannot say what he told them, I was not present.  I do not know what he told them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1465">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text>You misunderstand my question, I want your opinion as somebody who was fairly highly placed in the Garde.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1466">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Wasn&#039;t it strange to you or is it not strange to you even today, that he would not have mentioned this very important little motivational issue to the chaps from Natal?  I mean you had seen the bomb in the making, you had mentioned it to him, so it wasn&#039;t a State secret or an AWB secret, yet he said nothing at all, he actually referred to the BKA, the Boere Krisis Aksie, as the people who had been setting off bombs.  He said nothing about the Koesterfontein grouping and what they were getting up to?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1467">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I do not know why he didn&#039;t tell them that we were involved with that, I cannot give comment on that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1468">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text>Slightly different aspect, you continually refer to instructions that you were given, you were following orders, yet at the same time you were allowed to set conditions as a member, a committed member, you were allowed to say to them, I will only give you my motor vehicle if, now how does that conditional participation, how do you marry that with the fact that you were there to take orders?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1469">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Sorry, just help me understand why you could pick and choose when to take orders or follow orders and when to say to them, go and jump, I will only do it if?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1470">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, it was my vehicle and at that stage I said I will make my vehicle available if I could be the driver, because it is my car.  It is not that I put an ultimatum to him.  It wasn&#039;t that I said if I cannot drive my car, you cannot have it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1471">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I only said I wanted to drive the car.  No ultimatum was put.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1472">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text>But essentially this is what I have understood you to be saying, that you said to them, you are the person who is going to drive that motor vehicle, at the same time you have continuously said to us you were there to follow orders, you did very, very serious things because you were following orders, but the minor matter of who was driving your car, you dictated the terms on, essentially.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1473">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I am just trying to marry the part of you that takes orders unquestioningly and the other half of you that will say to them, you can have my car if I drive it.  The two halves, put them together for me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1474">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, Prinsloo needed a car, he did not have a car.  The stolen vehicles which he had to give to Barnard was not available, and because of that I told him my vehicle, I will make it available to you if I can be the driver of the car.  It is not an ultimatum, it is nothing like that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1475">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	If he said you cannot be the driver, then I wouldn&#039;t have made my vehicle available.  If that is what you are asking Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1476">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text>A final aspect, you have said to us today that you lied in the Supreme Court to prove your innocence, that is the way you put it, both in English and in Afrikaans?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1477">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1478">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text>You are giving evidence here today to prove your guilt essentially, the exact opposite?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1479">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1480">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text>Why should we accept what you are saying to us today when you were quite happy to lie before a Judge in the Supreme Court, having taken the oath, about your participation in these events?  Why should this Committee believe what you have to say today?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1481">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, in the Supreme Court, if I then spoke the truth, I would have not gotten 25 years, I would have gotten longer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1482">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Here in front of the Truth Commission I feel that if I speak the truth, you can reduce my sentence, and that is why I am telling you the truth.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1483">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text>You see before both forums you take the oath, you have taken the oath here, you took the oath then, and the dilemma I am left with just as an individual panel member is, which oath are you really, when did you tell the truth, was it then, is it now?	I still have a bit of a difficulty there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1484">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, when I was told that I can tell the truth at the Truth Commission and I can get amnesty, that is what I heard, and when I came here today, I am speaking the truth as far as I can.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1485">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I have already said that in the Supreme Court I told a lie in order to prove my innocence.  If I spoke the truth in the High Court, I would not have received 25 years prison sentence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1486">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr De Wet, thanks Judge.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1487">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr De Wet, this war that you talk about, and if I understand your evidence it took on the form of planing bombs?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1488">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>Yes bomb planting and taking up weapons, to take up weapons where you shoot someone like in a war, in the Defence Force.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1489">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>When would this have happened?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1490">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>With the speeches that was made, we will not negotiate, we will negotiate over the barrel of a gun, and I saw that the planting of bombs was the run up to this revolution and that in the end, with the elections, we will then take up arms.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1491">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But according to you, the only reason for the war at that stage, was to stop the elections?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1492">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Mr Chairman, that was my reason.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1493">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>No other reasons?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1494">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No, I had no other reasons.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1495">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You gave evidence that you were asked to choose between the Ystergarde and the Wenkommando?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1496">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1497">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Your answer was that you would rather choose the Ystergarde because it was your work?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1498">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1499">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Were you paid for that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1500">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Mr Chairperson, I did it freely.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1501">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What do you mean when you said you made the choice, because it is your work or what you did at the Ystergarde was a job?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1502">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>I did the course of the Ystergarde, because for me it was important that the people who were with me in the AWB, I wanted to train them and I wanted to become an instructor within the Ystergarde.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1503">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You just answered that the reason why you make this application is to help yourself getting out of jail?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1504">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1505">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Tell me Mr De Wet, after everything that happened, did you go through the trouble of finding out who is the families of the people who died?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1506">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Mr Chairperson, I did not go through the trouble, because outside I&#039;ve got no one to ask except the AWB who supports me at this stage to do any jobs for me.  There is no one within the Prison Service who supports us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1507">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I am asking you did you go through the trouble to find out who were the families of the people who died by the actions of the AWB?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1508">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Mr Chairperson, I only read in newspaper articles that were available to me, I only learnt their names there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1509">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>How do you feel about that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1510">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>My personal opinion at this stage is that I feel sorry for people who had to die within a lost cause, because we did lose this struggle.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1511">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did you try ultimately through your leader, to send a message to these people to say how sorry you are?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1512">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Mr Chairperson, there is no one who I can ask.  I did write letters to people, but no one wrote back about things I asked, I wanted to ask them what was going on in the country.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1513">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t think you understand my point.  I ask did you try to make peace with the families of the people who were killed or unfortunately killed, in the actions just before the elections?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1514">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1515">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did you think about it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1516">
			<speaker>MR DE WET</speaker>
			<text>No, I did not.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1517">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1518">
			<speaker>ADV PRIOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chair, sorry before we adjourn, sorry Mr Chair, could I approach the Committee just on one aspect before we adjourn.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1519">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Chair, my understanding of the position when we commenced Wednesday was that counsels in respect of applicants 1 and 2 had had their mandate terminated.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1520">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	At a later stage applicant 2 appeared personally and said that he is withdrawing his application.  Applicant 1 merely handed in Annexure B but his application as such is not withdrawn, is it still before you or not?  By who Sir, with respect Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1521">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	With respect Mr Chairman, if you look at Annexure B, as I gave instructions to my lawyers to make this application, that is the difficulty I have.  If his application has been withdrawn, he might be asked to be a witness at some stage.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1522">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I just want to get confirmation on that, I don&#039;t want to ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1523">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>(Microphone not switched on)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1524">
			<speaker>MR PRIOR</speaker>
			<text>The problem that I have is that Counsel indicated on Wednesday morning that they, their mandate had been terminated and hence they were not proceeding.  Mr Koper Myburgh personally withdrew his application, but Mr Barnard says in his Annexure B as I gave instructions to my representatives to withdraw my application, I&#039;ve got no more interest.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1525">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	He doesn&#039;t as such say I am withdrawing, he says I gave my lawyers instructions to withdraw my application.  That hasn&#039;t been done yet.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1526">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>(Microphone not switched on)  Mrs Van der Walt indicated to us that her instructions were to withdraw the matter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1527">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>I did withdraw.  My instruction that morning was ended but as Mr Prior can confirm, my instruction was actually as I heard from Mr Prior, that it was terminated.  Then there was another Advocate, Mr Rautenbach, who would have acted on behalf of Mr Barnard.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1528">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I talked to him on the phone just before we started, and he said that he received instructions to withdraw the application, but he said to Barnard that he&#039;s got no instructions, because he withdrew it and that is all that I know about this.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1529">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, I discussed this aspect with Mr Prior, there were letters written to the South African Police Service as well as the Amnesty or the TRC and where application is made for the file of Mr Koekemoer.  We need Mr Koekemoer&#039;s file, he was an informant and we&#039;ve got evidence that he was paid or a certain amount was paid to him, and that his instructions were given to him by the State, what his functions would be in order to infiltrate the AWB and what he reported back to the Security Police and what the Police knows about it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1530">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	The Police, with respect, was part of this action.  As it came forward from the case that there was a period for Mr Koekemoer to report back to the Police, they knew about the bombs and it may seem that the Police were involved in this matter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1531">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>How relevant is it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1532">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>With respect Mr Chairperson, it is relevant in order for there to be a full disclosure.  It is further more relevant for the interest of the families, the type of bombs that were built, the bombs that were improved by Koekemoer and if the Police knew about it and did nothing about it, the Police is definitely party to it and in the general light that it is the function of the TRC that these things will not be repeated in the future, it is of great importance.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1533">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Prinsloo, we are not here to fight any other battle.   If such allegations are made, then you can call in this evidence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1534">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>But with respect Mr Chairperson, if that file is made available, it could maybe shorten this hearing.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1535">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Do your application.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1536">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>The request I am directing towards the Committee that there must be a subpoena issued for Colonel Pretorius and Captain Van der Berg of Potchefstroom, to submit the file to the Committee.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1537">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I would like to make a ruling and I will give my decision to you tomorrow.  I would just like to talk to the Committee about it and tomorrow morning, first thing, I would be in a position to tell you yes or no.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1538">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Is there any other thing, any other questions?  Nothing else?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1539">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	We will adjourn.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1540">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS UNTIL 23-06-1998</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>