<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY HEARING</type>
	<startdate>1998-07-31</startdate>
	<location>PRETORIA</location>
	<day>10</day>
	<names>WYBRAND ANDREAS LODEWICKUS DU TOIT</names>
	<case>AM 5184/97</case>
						<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=52748&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/1998/98072031_pre_cosatu10.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="46">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson, I call Mr Waal du Toit.  You will find his application on page 1 of Volume 2.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>WYBRAND ANDREAS LODEWICKUS DU TOIT</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr du Toit, you are applying for amnesty in connection with the explosion at Khotso House?   </text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker>MR DU TOIT</speaker>
			<text>Yes that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>And just to get back to what you called it here, you describe your involvement on page 6 as that of being an accessory after the fact to malicious injury to property and you are asking for amnesty for any other offences or delicts which are directly connected to your involvement in this regard?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker>MR DU TOIT</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>And then if you will go to page 1, paragraph 7(a) and (b) would it be correct to say that you are the supporter of the National Party?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>MR DU TOIT</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Page 2, do you confirm the correctness of that page?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>MR DU TOIT</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Page 3?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker>MR DU TOIT</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>As far as page 6 at the top, paragraph 9(a)?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker>MR DU TOIT</speaker>
			<text>Yes that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Can you recall - you&#039;ve heard the evidence of Mr Kok who worked under your command that there was an instruction to assist Colonel de Kock?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>MR DU TOIT</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Do you accept that that&#039;s how it happened?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>MR DU TOIT</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Can you recall the request of Mr Kok?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>MR DU TOIT</speaker>
			<text>No I can&#039;t specifically recall it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>But you will accept that Mr - by the way Mr de Kock also can&#039;t remember it, he said that he would have phoned you and it would have been a normal routine request and perhaps he might have told you what it was about but you can&#039;t recall that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>MR DU TOIT</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>But you accept that you gave Mr Kok an order?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>MR DU TOIT</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Was this a routine type of request?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker>MR DU TOIT</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it was a routine request.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>And you first heard that he was involved in the blowing up of Khotso House when he reported back to you at a later stage?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>MR DU TOIT</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he reported back to me on the next day.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Were you also aware of the allegations without commenting on the correctness thereof, allegations regarding Khotso House and the SACC, in other words allegations that they were giving support to liberation movements etc?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker>MR DU TOIT</speaker>
			<text>Yes I was aware of that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>And you as a technical man had no way in which to verify that information?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>MR DU TOIT</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>You just accepted that these allegations or information was correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker>MR DU TOIT</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>As far as your personal political convictions were concerned at that stage after you heard this you reconciled yourself with the fact that this was done in the struggle against the liberation movements?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker>MR DU TOIT</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I associated myself with it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>You also heard the evidence given here by Minister Vlok the former Commissioner of Police and the other person who was in charge of this operation as far as the political motivation of this operation was concerned, do you associate yourself with that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker>MR DU TOIT</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Do you confirm the total content of your application as it has been submitted to the Committee?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker>MR DU TOIT</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>And you request amnesty as it is set out in the documents?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker>MR DU TOIT</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR BOOYENS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>