<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY HEARING</type>
	<startdate>1998-09-21</startdate>
	<location>MMABATHO</location>
	<day>1</day>
	<names>ONTLAMETSE BERNSTEIN MENYATSOE</names>
		<matter>MURDER OF AWB MEMBERS</matter>
					<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=52876&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/1998/98092123_mma_mmabath3.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="650">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	On the extreme right is Advocate Sigodi, she is from the Eastern Cape, Port Elizabeth.  On my immediate right is Advocate Motata who is a member of the Bar in Johannesburg.  On my left is Advocate Bosman, who is from the Cape and I am Selwyn Miller, also from the Eastern Cape, a Judge in the Transkei Division of the High Court.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>ADV HENDRICKSE</speaker>
			<text>May it please you Mr Chairman, my surname is Hendrickse.  I represent the applicant in this matter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>;   My name is Terreblanche, I represent the AWB.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker>ADV VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, my name is Gerhard Van Der Berg.  I am from the Pretoria Bar and represent Mrs Uys in this application.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker>ADV MPSHE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, Members of the Committee, J M Mpshe for the Truth Commission, in particular the Amnesty Committee, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>ADV MPSHE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Mr Chairman.  Everything is ready.  The TV has been set and the video we are ready to kick off with.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And the channels.  Do you know what they are?  Channel one is on the little device, channel one is Afrikaans, channel two is English and channel three is Tswana.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>ADV MPSHE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, may I just put something on record before I hand over to my learned friend.  That as already informed in chambers, Advocate Johan Engelbrecht has withdrawn.  He was the representative for the AWB, and Mr Terreblanche is going to conduct the questioning and evidence when it starts on behalf of the AWB.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	And further aspect Mr Chairman, that the Chairman of the Committee will recall that the last time one of the postponed, one of the reasons for this postponement was to secure the attendance of two journalists, Mr Ray Hartley and Mr Peter de Ionne, and it was put on record that Mr Engelbrecht is to contact me and give me the particulars of the relevant journalists which then he did not do, but on my own, after I had been phoned by one of the journalists, I contacted them.  I spoke to them, I served them with the necessary notices and they were willing to come.  But I arranged with them that they be here only tomorrow.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Mpshe.  Mr Hendrickse?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker>MR HENDRICKSE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairman and Members of the Commission.  Mr Chairman, right from the onset, as agreed with my learned friends, I would ask the Commission and my learned friends to view a certain video footage.  It is not that long.  It will set out a background to the events that led to this application.  I am calling upon the personnel to put on the video.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Hendrickse.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Who took the video, who made the video?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker>MR HENDRICKSE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Hendrickse.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>SHOWING OF VIDEO</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>ADV MPSHE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, just to confirm what my learned friend has just said, I secured the video from the then Bop TV, through the director of the station.  I could assume that it was filmed by the crew that was on the scene, that day.  But I obtained them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Mr Hendrickse?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>MR HENDRICKSE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairman.  Mr Chairman from the onset I would like to apply for an amendment of the application form of the applicant.  The form is marked on the right top, there is a letter 1.  It is the very first page of the application form, paragraph 7a, thereof, after the words</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>May the following words be inserted:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>That is the amendment.  Thank you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Any objections to this amendment?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>In this issue, it was quite a surprise that this insertion is only made now.  Now they only think about it politically and now they add the insertion.  If that was the intention and the meaning from the start then it should have been there from the start.  If it was his case that he belonged to the ANC, he did not belong to the ANC if you looked at the documents so now it is the first time that he inserts it.  So it is my submission, they should not be allowed, because if it was his case, he should have said that from the start.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker>MR HENDRICKSE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, and Honourable Members.  This is an application for amendment.  Amendments can be applied for at any stage and it is my submission that has ground and evidence will be presented that will show that an amendment is necessary under the circumstances.  I ask this Honourable Committee to grant amendment to the application form.  Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker>ADV MOTATA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker>MR HENDRICKSE</speaker>
			<text>Honourable Member, it is my submission that after consultation it became clear that the applicant was indeed a supporter of the ANC.  When this form was completed, it was not included.  Before this hearing was postponed in August of this year I took it up with my learned friend who is the Leader of Evidence in this TRC.  We agreed that we will viva voce, apply for an amendment.  Under the circumstances I took it that it was not necessary to apply on paper for an amendment before hand and that is the reason why I am applying for the amendment now.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I also offer an objection considering the fact that the applicant was a member of the police, of the Bophuthatswana Police and also in his documents, he says that he did what the people wanted to do and he was forced by people to do that.  He had enough time to say in those documents that he was in fact a member of the opposition party, and that is of Mr Mangope.  And so I also make objection to this.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker>ADV MPSHE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, perhaps as requested by Committee Member, Adv Motata, I want to support what he said.  Seeing that this amendment impacts actually on full disclosure and it has got a bearing on Section 20, Subsection 2 of the Act, I would have expected my learned friend to give reasons why an amendment is done now and why he could not, why this was not mentioned in all the documents, seeing that it is of vital importance in as far as the act is concerned.  If he can give reasons why this amendment then I have no objection to the application.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker>MR HENDRICKSE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairman.  Mr Chairman, I will now call upon the applicant, Mr Menyatsoe to give evidence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Menyatsoe, do you have any objection to taking the oath?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I have no objection, Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Would you please rise.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker>ONTLAMETSE BERNSTEIN MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MR HENDRICKSE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairman.  Mr Menyatsoe, on the 10th day of March 1994, you were then a member of the then Bophuthatswana Police Force.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker>MR HENDRICKSE</speaker>
			<text>Is it also correct that you were stationed at head office here in Mmabatho, Mafikeng?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker>MR HENDRICKSE</speaker>
			<text>Please relate to this Commission ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Thank you Mr Hendrickse, you may proceed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker>MR HENDRICKSE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairman.  Mr Menyatsoe, please relate to this Commission the events that occurred on the 10th March 1994, starting from the 10th March 1994.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	We drove off in his car and on our way we saw some, the roads blocked with car scraps and stones and people were screaming that Mangope has fallen down and viva ANC.  We drove up to the head office and when we got there the situation was completely changed.  It was not the head office that we knew.  The police were standing in small groups as if they did not know where they belonged.  We parted with my neighbour and we went to our different offices.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	When I got to my office, I found some of the policemen who I work with not dressed in uniform like me.  A car was taken out so that we should go and dress in our uniforms and we were given firearms.  I was given an R4 rifle.  We got into the car and drove home to take our uniforms.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	People were passing in front of us and screaming viva ANC.  We could see that it is not possible for the Mangope government to go on because people showed that they were sick and tired of it.  And we also raised our arms and showed them that we are in support of what they were saying. (The sound is cutting - the interpretation cannot pick up all the information)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I was given an R4 rifle and we went into the car and we drove off and we passed by groups of people who were singing songs, screaming viva ANC and down with Mangope.  We did the same, we lifted our arms and called out viva, viva.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	When I arrived at my residential place I took my uniform.  I put it in a bag and when on my way into the car, my landlord told me that I should not come with a police car in his premises because I will land him into trouble.  Well I went into the car and we drove off helping the others to pick up their uniforms as well and we drove back to the headquarters of the police.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	And on our arrival there we went into the barracks to get dressed into our uniforms and thereafter, back to the offices.  One police officer, whose name I cannot recall, called the policemen and explained to them as to what has happened to the police and the armed forces.  And he said that we must stay alert because the AWB can come to the police to take over.  We dispersed and we were just around the TTA yard.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="61">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I went outside and I saw the main gate of TTA and there were vans passing by full of white men dressed in khaki and they were armed with guns and I heard a gun shot from those cars and that hit in front of my foot and I landed on the ground.  I was diving for cover.  I crawled to the wall which is the perimeter(?) wall of TTA.  I stayed there and the gun firing was gosrging on.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="62">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Thereafter I heard people approaching and they were screaming and shaking the gate of the TTA saying that the police must give them the firearms.  When they entered they saw me lying there and they asked me to give them the firearm or else protect them or defend them.  But because I knew what was the policy about the handling of firearms, I refused giving them the firearms but decided to defend them rather.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="63">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I had no choice because there were so many in number.  I went out with them.  I was in the middle, went across the tar road in front of TTA and I lied in some bushes around there.  After some time I heard these people screaming out loudly, AWB, AWB.  And after sometime a blue Mercedes Benz was approaching and they were shooting and they went past where I was lying and at that time I could not shoot because there were so many people who were in front of me and I did not want to injure them. </text>
		</line>
		<line number="64">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	And I asked them to please stay clear and they did that.  I shot one warning shot in the air, trying to scare these gentlemen in the blue Mercedes Benz., but they continued shooting.  And that is when I saw that this is a war.  And I shot back at them.  As I was shooting I heard somebody screaming saying that they have just shot me.  And as I was looking this person was bleeding on his thigh.  I continued shooting until the Mercedes Benz came to a standstill at the &quot;STOP&quot; next to the TTA and I ran towards it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="65">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="66">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="67">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	What I am here for today is to ask for amnesty and forgiveness from the family members of Uys, Wolfaardt and Fourie.  It is because I know that it is very painful to lose a husband, a father and a family member, but please pardon me for what I have done.  There was no alternative because I thought that it was a situation of war prevailing.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="68">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	If we can look back, people who were killed in Bophuthatswana who were helpless and who knew nothing about handling firearms were killed and injured here in Bophuthatswana, who have never actually laid their hands on the arms, they have just seen them in the newspapers and in the televisions.  People who were just going about their own daily routines and in their own country were killed, innocent as they were.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="69">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	But anyway, Fourie and Wolfaardt and the Uys families must please forgive me for what happened but it happened under a war situation.  It has, it was thought that Sergeant Nare was the one who did these.  And he suffered because of these and him and his family went through all the trouble and he was suspended from his work.  Therefore I saw it necessary for me to come forward to this Commission and say the truth that Nare is not responsible for all these but myself, Menyatsoe.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="70">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="71">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="72">
			<speaker>MR HENDRICKSE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Menyatsoe, at that time were you a member or a supporter of any political organisation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="73">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="74">
			<speaker>MR HENDRICKSE</speaker>
			<text>The UCDP, which party was that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="75">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>It was the organisation of the former Bophuthatswana regime.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="76">
			<speaker>MR HENDRICKSE</speaker>
			<text>And of which party were you a supporter?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="77">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I was supporting the ANC.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="78">
			<speaker>MR HENDRICKSE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairman, I have no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="79">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR HENDRICKSE</text>
		</line>
		<line number="80">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Hendrickse.  Mr Van Der Berg do you have any questions to ask the witness?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="81">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, Yes.  Mr Terreblanche will ask questions first.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="82">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="83">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I grew up in Lifurudzi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="84">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="85">
			<speaker>TRANSLATOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="86">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The translator is informing me that she cannot hear the applicant.  There must be another problem with the machine.  If you could just bear with us for a while while it is taken a look at.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="87">
			<speaker>INTERPRETER</speaker>
			<text>We can proceed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="88">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  If you could please just repeat the last question, Mr Terreblanche.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="89">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, the question asked of Mr Menyatsoe was: &quot;Where did you go to school and what was your scholastic training, to what standard did you go&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="90">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I schooled in Lifurudzi up to Std 9.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="91">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Continue please Mr Terreblanche.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="92">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="93">
			<speaker>TRANSLATOR</speaker>
			<text>The answer was he attended his school in Lifurudzi, that is in the Zeerust area, up to Standard nine.  Did you hear that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="94">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="95">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Ok, we will try again.  If you could please repeat the answer to the last question, namely what schooling and what standard did the applicant achieve at school.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="96">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I went to school up to Standard nine in Lifurudzi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="97">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Menyatsoe, you did receive a certificate for standard nine, in other words you just had one year left in order to complete your education.  After that you went to the police or what happened?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="98">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Please repeat your question, Mr Terreblanche.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="99">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>I am saying Mr Menyatsoe, when you completed your standard nine and received the certificate, which was a good educational level at that stage.  When you went to go and look for work, did you go to the police immediately or what career did you follow after that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="100">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I went job hunting.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="101">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>Let me put it to you in another way.  After you obtained your academic qualifications did you do any other work in between and what work did you do before you went to the police?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="102">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I worked in the mines.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="103">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Menyatsoe, and then you decided to join the Bophuthatswana Police.  In what year did you do this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="104">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>It was in 1991.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="105">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  And then you were in service of the Bophuthatswana Police up and to the matter occurred.  How many years of service did you have when this incident occurred?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="106">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I served from.  I started from 1991 up until the 1994 when these occurred.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="107">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>You were a fully trained member of the Bophuthatswana Police.  Can you tell us in what section you were, was it a detective, there was security, safety, the unrest unit.  In what section did you serve or receive training in the Bophuthatswana Police?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="108">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I was under the protective unit, the protection unit.  I was serving in it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="109">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>What did you have to protect, Mr Menyatsoe?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="110">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="111">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>So is it correct if I say you mainly was a security official protecting very important people, the General and the President.  You had to protect the high officials of this country.  Is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="112">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Please repeat your question Mr Terreblanche.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="113">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>I am asking if it was correct that if I say that you were mainly in the protection unit.  You had to protect the State President, you went from head office to the Free State and then you were transferred back here where you protected a General.  We know that there are different sections in the police, but your task was exclusively protection and you were entrusted with the lives of the high officials of the country, the President, the Generals lives.  Is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="114">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Yes I was protecting the President and again I was protecting the General together with all the Bophuthatswana people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="115">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>I am  very grateful for the fact that you also wanted to protect the people, but was it your task to just protect Bophuthatswana people.  But as a task as a policeman was it there to protect or to provide protection against crime and people who wanted to kill others and chaos, what was the task or what is the task of a policeman?  Can you tell us, is, probably had an oath where you put your hand up and say that you will swear that you will be loyal to an oath.  What is the first most important task of a member of the Bophuthatswana Police?  You have received your training and there they taught you what your actual task was.  You are not a soldier that going into a war, you must protect.  Now can you tell us then, what can you remember concerning the oath of loyalty that you took?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="116">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Terreblanche, it seems you do not understand me well.  If you are a policeman or in the police force you are trained as under general training and from there you are given various posts and then again you can be taken from a particular unit to a different unit.  So the policeman works anyway where he is based.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="117">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>I am asking these questions for a good reason.  I am asking you specifically.  What was your task?  You have already told me that your task was that of protecting important people, that is the State President included.  When I asked you what other training you received, you did not answer the question.  I am happy if you tell me that you were exclusively tasked with protecting.  With regards to, except for all your other training, were you exclusively tasked for protecting the State President and the General?  You were a security person, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="118">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>As I have already explained, Mr Terreblanche, I was a policeman at that time.  Any work of the police I was given I would do it.  I acted like any other police.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="119">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>So you performed any tasks which was given to you by a senior.  You always performed those tasks.  Is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="120">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>May you please repeat your question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="121">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Menyatsoe, I am only asking in order to confirm what you have already said.  You said that you performed instruction or tasks, and now I am asking you, any instruction which was given to you by your seniors, did you follow that instruction to the best of your ability?  Did you listen to them when the senior person told you do this and do that?  Did you receive those orders and did you follow them strictly so you never worked outside of the instructions you got, please?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="122">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="123">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>So Mr Menyatsoe, who gave you as a member of the Bop Police, to go and shoot or kill injured people.  Shoot them in the back of the head while he was facing the ground.  Whose instructions were those which you followed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="124">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>At that time there was no Commanding Officer.  That is why I said right from the onset that it was a war situation and even a Commanding Officer at that time would be fending for his life at that time, but there was no Commanding Officer around but I used my discretion as a policeman to kill your soldiers because it was a war situation.  I used my own discretion as a trained policeman that whilst on duty you have a right to use your own discretion.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="125">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Menyatsoe, please do not tell me what my rights are.  I am asking you what were your rights?  You are saying that you had the right and according to your training, because you say you are a trained policeman, it was your right to go to three wounded people, this is now after the war situation, after it passed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="126">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="127">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>  They left Bophuthatswana and these media people,  did you see the media, Mr Menyatsoe?  Were there members of the media, were there other policemen?  You say there were no other Officers.  Were there members of the defence force?  You were completely on your own.  You are a Constable, the lowest rank within the police force and there is nobody else who has got a higher rank than you at the scene of the crime, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="128">
			<speaker>ADV MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Would we ask you to have shorter sentences because in the process you asked three questions in one question and I think having problems with the applicant.  Just confine your sentences, ask one fact per question so that we get it, so that we are not confused as to what is happening please.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="129">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And also please, Mr Terreblanche, if you could just speak a little slower because the interpreters have to translate simultaneously and it is difficult for them to keep up with you, so just a little bit slower, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="130">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="131">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I can assure you, I say this at every hearing I attend I have to tell people to speak a bit slower so you are not unique in that regard.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="132">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="133">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I took the decision on my own.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="134">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>You also said that there were no other senior members, or people with higher rank present.  Is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="135">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Yes I said that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="136">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>So, everybody who was there, Mr Menyatsoe were Constables.  There were no Sergeants or any higher ranks.  Here in this war situation, where the war is fought with Constables or by means of Constables, only Constables.  Is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="137">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I did not say that there were Constables only.  What I said is that there was no Commanding Officer at that time and even the Constable can be in charge of other Constables in that situation but I did not say that it was just only the Constables who were in the war, but I am telling about somebody who would have taken instructions from.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="138">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	  I had the capacity to give instructions at that time but there was no one specifically responsible at that time.  I did not say that it was only Constables involved, please hear me correct Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="139">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Menyatsoe, we will leave it with your answer.  It is correct that that was the last vehicle, the blue Mercedes Benz.   It was a vehicle which was separated from the other vehicles, they were there on their own.  All the other vehicles have already left.  Is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="140">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="141">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The question, Mr Menyatsoe being put to you is, was the Mercedes Benz the last car there?  Do you know?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="142">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I do not know Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="143">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>Did you see other vehicles behind the Mercedes Benz, you followed the Mercedes Benz with your eyes up to the point where it got to a standstill?  Were there other vehicles behind them, behind this Mercedes?  Can you please just answer me that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="144">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I was concentrating solely on the blue Mercedes car and I went there and I shot your soldiers and thereafter I went back to the yard.  That is why I say that I do not know whether this Mercedes Benz was the last car.  I did not see if there were any cars thereafter.  I just shot your soldiers and went back into the yard.  That is why I say I did not see if it was the last car or not.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="145">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Menyatsoe, you say that this was a war situation.  But you saw no other vehicles behind or around this Mercedes but you are only concerned with the one vehicle.  You saw no other vehicles behind the Mercedes.  Can you remember which vehicles which were in front of the Mercedes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="146">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Terreblanche, I told you that there were open vans loading your soldiers and the Mercedes Benz was following them and at that time I was still in the yard when they went past and I have explained that to you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="147">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Menyatsoe.  So the Mercedes went to a standstill and you moved towards this Mercedes Benz.  Would you please tell us what exactly happened.  You got to the Mercedes and what did you find there?  When you walked towards the Mercedes Benz, here is the vehicle, what did you find there?  Please just answer that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="148">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="149">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>You were a trained policeman.  You alleged that these people were shooting at other people.  Did you look whether they had weapons with them?  One is against the wheel, one, or two are lying on the ground.  The first thing you had to do was to take their arms, to disarm them.  Did you see if they had arms, did you look for arms?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="150">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="151">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="152">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Menyatsoe, I asked you a simple question.  Did you look to see if the people who were lying there, if they had indeed weapons with them or if they were not armed?  You yourself has a R4 rifle with you which can kill people.  Did you look?  Did you ask them if they had weapons?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="153">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="154">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Menyatsoe on that, sorry Mr Terreblanche, if I might just intervene.  When you say you saw them shooting, did you notice the type of firearm that they were shooting with.  In other words were the firearms used rifles or hand guns?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="155">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Whilst they were shooting from this Mercedes I could not see what kind of firearms they were using.  I just heard shots.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="156">
			<speaker>ADV MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Terreblanche if I may just for a second.  And when you got to the car, that is the question you have been asked, when you got to the car did you see any firearms?  That is the question Mr Terreblanche has been asking.  Did you see any firearms?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="157">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I never noticed or saw any firearms.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="158">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Menyatsoe, can I just get some clarity on this.  When you got there what was the position, physical position of the three people who were killed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="159">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="160">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="161">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="162">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="163">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Menyatsoe, I was not there.  Maybe you thought that I was the person with the beard if I were there.  Maybe somebody else paid for me or for my life, like somebody else who carried the guilt, this sergeant in that everybody believed that he committed these murders and you were in hiding and we hear about this now.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="164">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I would just like to ask you, as a member of the police, I did ask you that before, but I was not ready with the equipment and everything and I spoke too fast.  This oath of loyalty that you took there where you also a while ago put your hand in the air and swore an oath of loyalty and truth, what can you remember about that oath that you took while you were in the police?  What did this oath say?  To whom must you be loyal?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="165">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>May you please repeat your question, Mr Terreblanche.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="166">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>I am trying to make it as easy as possible.  To be a member of the police you have to take a oath of loyalty, that is now for any police, in any country.  Who did you work for, to whom must you be loyal?  Must you be loyal to the authorities?  Must you uphold the laws of the country?  Must you arrest criminals?  Must you protect the authorities against people who break the law?  Can you remember what you actually did there?  For what did you get that payment, your salary cheque at the end of the month?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="167">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="168">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Menyatsoe, the initial question asked by Mr Terreblanche, can you remember the oath that you took when you became a policeman and if so, tell us what you can remember of that oath.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="169">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I took an oath that I would work for the community, I would protect the community, the government and to die for the nation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="170">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you very much.  Your oath you took before God and that said or entailed that you must protect the government, and that you must even die for the government and the people and authorities.  Therefore if the government needed you, you could die for them or for other reasons in the oath.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="171">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="172">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>Is it correct that you took an oath that you will die for the state if it is in danger?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="173">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="174">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>Now Mr Menyatsoe, when you then had that discussion with people who were lying there on the ground, then you realised that these people are coming to help the President.  Is that correct?  They are not coming to help the people around you but they are coming to help the President or what idea did you have of the situation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="175">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>May you please repeat that question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="176">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The question was that after you had spoken to those three people who were lying next to the vehicle, did you realise that they had come to Bophuthatswana to help the President, the then President of Bophuthatswana.  That was the question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="177">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="178">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I was getting the English and Afrikaans at the same time and I think that it happened with the other mics.  I wonder if the interpreters could just please repeat the answer to that question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="179">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I did not say that these people said to me that they have come to assist the Bophuthatswana President, but what I said is, they said to me I should go and ask my President.  I did not say that they said they have come to help my President.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="180">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Menyatsoe, you were then angry at the President.  You then yourself said that he did not want the people to vote.  You were angry at him.  You even said that you left and walked over the road, or crossed the road to go and help or to support the people there.  You were angry at him.  He did not want you to vote, is that not correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="181">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Terreblanche, I did not say that I did not want the President, I never said that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="182">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>At that stage were you angry with the President because of the situation relating to the voting?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="183">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I was angry and hurt because of what was happening to the black nation that being trodden and destroyed by your people and this happened in front of my eyes.  The whole Mafikeng.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="184">
			<speaker>ADV MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>I wonder if I may interpose here.  Mr Menyatsoe, you should understand the context of the question asked by Mr Terreblanche, that therein, it is not only what you have said but also what you said in the papers before us and I would invite you to look at page 14S ?, where you are trying to explain the political objective.  Just there you say, &quot;Government of the ex-Bophuthatswana, who through their leader, the ex-President, Lucas Mangope, refused to participate in the elections.&quot;  You see that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="185">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Yes I see that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="186">
			<speaker>ADV MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>What I am saying, I am not going to suggest an answer to you but when Mr Terreblanche is asking questions he has also read your papers, these questions also impact on the papers before us.  Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="187">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I understand Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="188">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>Can we then say that you were very angry at the President and that you did not like any of his decisions?  Can we accept it, you were very angry at him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="189">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="190">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Menyatsoe, you were very angry at the President and you knew that the AWB had come because someone had told you or that the whites are sleeping there at the defence force base and they are entertained there.  You knew they were there.  Someone said to you that they took over the whole thing.  Is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="191">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>What is the question in fact here?  Is this a phrase or a question?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="192">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Menyatsoe, I asked you a simple question.  You knew that the AWB is at the defence force headquarters.  Did you know this?  Yes or no?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="193">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Yes I was aware.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="194">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="195">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I did not know as to whether he was anti or for them, but what I just heard is that the AWB soldiers were in the defence headquarters.  As to whether he called them or not, Mr Mangope, I did not know.  What I know is that yourself and your army were in the air base.  That is all I know.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="196">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Menyatsoe, now I understand.  It is not the AWB who angered you, that you would leave your post and walk across the road and go to the ANC people.  It was not the AWB people because you did not know or knew that Mangope wanted us there.  You were just angry at Mangope.  You were so angry that you lifted your rifle in the air and shouted with the others.  Is that correct?  It was not the AWB.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="197">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Please repeat your question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="198">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>Your answer that you did not know if the AWB was welcome there or not, this is now at the defence force base.  Is that correct?  Is that what you said?  Now I am asking you, I was under the impression that you were so angry at the AWB because they were helping Mangope who did not want the people to vote and now you are saying, no.  It is not why you were angry or you said you did not understand.  Can you just explain this to me.  Why did you walk over to the ANC people, the people who broke the windows and sang and shouted?  Is it not in these documents that you went over to the people across the road?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="199">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Still I am waiting the question about the air base and now you already into the TTA.  You are actually confusing me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="200">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>I think, Mr Menyatsoe, we made it very clear.  I will not continue with this question.  I want to know that it was your task to protect the government.  Is that correct, you have said that earlier on.  Did you then protect the government?  Or did you kill people who were killing your people?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="201">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Please be aware of the fact that Mr Mangope is not the government himself only.  Government is formed by the nation as well.  When I say that I was protecting or defending Mr Mangope, does not necessarily mean I have to neglect the nation.  He was not the sole government, Mr Mangope.  You as well, Mr Terreblanche, you cannot operate on your own, that is why you have got your supporters or your assistants there next to you.  I also had to serve the nation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="202">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="203">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I did that for the nation and for the government and the nation that was being killed by your army at that time.  That is why I say I was protecting the very nation that we are following of Bophuthatswana.  I was trying to stop your army from the continuous killings that were going on.  That is why immediately thereafter the incident of your three soldiers when I actually killed them and thereafter the shootings in Mmabatho actually minimised.  I think you do agree with me that after this incident there were few killings here in Mafikeng.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="204">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>Can you just answer my question.  I am not here to listen to a political summary of your opinions, I just want the answer to my question.  This is about the cold-blooded murder of people.  It is about your application for amnesty.  The panel have to decide if you will receive amnesty and will walk out here as a free person or if this deed stands directly opposed to the rights of humans and if it is against conventions decided on an international level.  Can you just answer my question please.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="205">
			<speaker>MR HENDRICKSE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="206">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I think if he could keep the questions as short as possible please Mr Terreblanche, to avoid any confusion that may result from long questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="207">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	The question that was asked you was, were you protecting the nation, the government and the nation when you shot those three people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="208">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>According to my discretion I was protecting the nation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="209">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>I will ask you a very short question and you have got a lot of time to answer this.  Mr Chairperson, I am objecting, I am trying to keep to the questions, I am not making speeches, so I think that this objection is not relevant.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="210">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I am now asking you a question Mr Menyatsoe.  How do you protect the government of President Mangope?  The whole government who did not want to take part in voting by killing Fourie, Uys and Wolfaardt, who did not have any weapons and who were pleading for medical aid?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="211">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="212">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>I am convinced that you do not want to answer this question but I will try.  Were you afraid of one person who was apparently almost dead, and one who was severely injured and pleading for an ambulance and another person?  Were you afraid you afraid that they will jump up and here I will have to elaborate because otherwise you do not understand again.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="213">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="214">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I do understand your question, Mr Terreblanche.  I did not say that these people were not armed.  I killed your soldiers because of the war that they had brought into this area.  I shot them because I knew that they were armed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="215">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>Let us leave the question there.  The following, you saw one of the three attempting to shoot you.  Can you exactly or explain what you testified.  They were lying there, then you saw someone, you were talking to them, they said that they were injured and that they wanted help.  Then you saw someone, one of them make a movement and that he was going to shoot you.  Is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="216">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="217">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>Then you reacted very quickly, because this person wants to shoot me.  Is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="218">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="219">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>You thought that you would shoot him first.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="220">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I do not remember which one I shot first of those three.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="221">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>But you can remember which one wanted to shoot you.  Can you remember that?  It is terrible, these people are lying in front of you and one of them wants to shoot you.  You must charge him in front of this Honourable Committee, he now wants to shoot you.  Which one of the three, it cannot be all three.  Which one was it?  Can you remember?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="222">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>At that time, Mr Terreblanche, I was very angry and emotional.  I could not see which one was trying to shoot me.  I do not recall clearly because this happened years ago.  I cannot recall everything to the detail.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="223">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="224">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="225">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="226">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>When you were giving in chief, this is my notes, correct me if it is wrong.  You said that after you spoke with these people who were lying on the ground.  One moved and his hand went underneath, I thought he pulling a gun and I then shot all three of them.  That is my notes of your evidence.  Can you remember a hand going underneath?  You said that in your evidence in chief, unless my note is wrong.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="227">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I said so, but I do not recall clearly which one of the three.  That is my answer.  I do not recall which one of the three.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="228">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>I will leave it there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="229">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Can I just intervene.  Mr Menyatsoe, now the word underneath is a translated word, but what did you mean by saying I saw a hand going underneath?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="230">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="231">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Was it going underneath his body?  Was he moving his hand under his body, what precisely did you see?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="232">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="233">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>By moving his left arm down to the side and behind to the back of his body, going down towards the waist.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="234">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="235">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="236">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>ON RESUMPTION</text>
		</line>
		<line number="237">
			<speaker>ONTLAMETSE BERNSTEIN MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>(s.u.o.)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="238">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>(cont)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="239">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Thank you very much, Chairperson. </text>
		</line>
		<line number="240">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="241">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="242">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="243">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>You asked me about AWB as to how do they carry their arms and now you are changing the question to just an ordinary person.  Now let me respond to the first version of your question.  I do not know how do the AWB carry their arms.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="244">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And the second part?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="245">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>The second part is what you have said in evidence or as in response to the question.  He moved his hand downwards to where one would usually carry his firearm.  Where does one usually carry his firearm?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="246">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>He moved his hand around his waist.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="247">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>To his left or right hip or waist?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="248">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I do not recall.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="249">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>In which position was he lying when he dropped his hand?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="250">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I do not recall.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="251">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>You only remember that he dropped his hand?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="252">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I do not recall.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="253">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="254">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I do recall the fact that he did move his hand.  As to which hand I do not recall and as to whether, how was he positioned, I do not recall as well.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="255">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="256">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Terreblanche, when you are in a war situation, any ordinary person when you holding a hostage, the moment that person moves, you expect anything to happen.  That movement can result in anything.  You have to be careful.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="257">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="258">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Terreblanche, let me respond to your question by saying, my intentions of going to your soldiers was not to see as to whether they were armed or not but to kill them in order to protect the nation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="259">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>So the goal was to kill them, not to see if they are armed, not to see if they maybe want to shoot.  The purpose was to kill them in order to protect the nation, even if they were not armed, is that correct?  You wanted to kill them, even if they had no weapons with them, is that what you are saying?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="260">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I have already explained that.  I was going to do what came to my mind which is to kill them in the very same manner that they killed people here in Bophuthatswana.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="261">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>So you did what came into your mind.  What came to your mind was to kill these people, those three people who were lying there.  Is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="262">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Please repeat your question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="263">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="264">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="265">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>Yes you only kill, that is what you are saying.  I accept that you wanted to kill them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="266">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	You say, you did that because these three people killed other people.  Did you see these people killing someone else?  These three people who you have read about in the documents and there were allegations that there were people on a pick-up who were shooting at people but these three people in the blue Mercedes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="267">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>As I have already explained they had already shot somebody who was standing next to me in the thigh.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="268">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>They shot him dead.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="269">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>They shot him in the thigh and they did not kill him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="270">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>Someone else?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="271">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>And the other one was shot in the belly.  As to whether he or she died, I do not know.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="272">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>Now do you know which of these three people killed or shot the one guy in the thigh and the other one in the belly?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="273">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I do not know, but because he was one of the AWB members who was firing, that is why I did what I did which is shooting them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="274">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Furthermore, if somebody is shooting from a car, you cannot notice as to which one is shooting of the three and what kind of a firearm is he or she using.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="275">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>So because you do not know who shot you decided that because this person is a member of the AWB, you decide you will kill all the members of the AWB you find.  You found three members of the AWB, you shot all of them.  If there were four would you have shot all of them as well?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="276">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="277">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="278">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Please repeat the question.  Please repeat your question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="279">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="280">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>These men were dressed in khaki, khaki uniforms of which you always identify with the AWB whenever you see them in the television and in the newspapers.  And moreover I had already learnt that the AWB members were in Mafikeng and I know that is the dress code of the AWB.  Moreover they were coming from the direction of Mmabatho.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="281">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>It was the dress code of the AWB to do what?  Do you mean the clothes or do you mean their way of behaving?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="282">
			<speaker>ADV MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Terreblanche, the three who were shot, is it in dispute whether they were members of the AWB?  Are we disputing this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="283">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>Honourable Judge, because he said, because they were AWB members, he shot them.  Now it is in dispute.  I want to know how did he know they were AWB?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="284">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="285">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I just want to ask the applicant, behind me we have three members in khaki clothes, they are colleagues of his.  They are security police.  I am also in khaki outfit.  The question I want to ask is you are saying because they were AWB, you shot them.  So you wanted to shoot AWB people and you accepted that they were AWB because they were dressed in khaki.  You are not shooting now because, because somebody now tried to go for his weapon.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="286">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>That they were dressed in khaki and that he had learnt that the AWB were in town.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="287">
			<speaker>ADV MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>And further that when he first noticed the car they were shooting out of the car, that is his evidence and in his mind he concluded immediately that these are the AWB members.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="288">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="289">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Terreblanche, I told you in depth that I had learnt that the AWB were in the defence force base in Bophuthatswana.  I told you that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="290">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>The question is simply ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="291">
			<speaker>ADV SIGODI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="292">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.  What I want to put to the witness is that they were white people and that he shot white people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="293">
			<speaker>ADV SIGODI</speaker>
			<text>The crux of the matter is that do you dispute that they were AWB people?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="294">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>No it is not in dispute.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="295">
			<speaker>ADV SIGODI</speaker>
			<text>take us any further to pursue this point if they were in fact AWB people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="296">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="297">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="298">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="299">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="300">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>What I am saying is that I do not hate them which simply means I like them as human beings.  They are human beings.  We exist in the same earth.  I love them as just ordinary human beings, but they did not respect the black people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="301">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="302">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>According to my knowledge, the AWB has undermined and disrespected the black people from the 10th to the 11th by attacking them.  That is according to my experience and knowledge.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="303">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Menyatsoe, do you have any other knowledge of the AWB?  Do you know what they stand for?  Do you know what their principles are?  Do you know what they want?  What does the AWB want?  What are they working for?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="304">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="305">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>In other words, you do not know what the program of principles are of the AWB?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="306">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>At all Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="307">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>You do not know if they want apartheid?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="308">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Terreblanche, please do not repeat your question.  I told you that I do not know, I did not know and I was never interested in knowing, Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="309">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>You see, Mr Menyatsoe, the reason why I am asking this is in the politics of the AWB and the politics you support, you killed these people.  Because you say you do not know anything about the AWB.  In other words, it is not about politics that you killed them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="310">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I killed them because they wanted to kill the black nation, that is why I was defending the nation.  I had to protect the nation, it was my duty to protect them, should they be endangered and the danger was caused by your army.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="311">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Menyatsoe, it is of course not my defence force, but let us leave it there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="312">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	This nation that the AWB wanted to kill, this black nation.  Are you referring to two incidents or cases where one of those vehicles shot or fired shots, is that what you are talking about now?  Are you now talking about this nation.  They were then on their was out of Bophuthatswana.  You killed them because they wanted to kill the black nation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="313">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Terreblanche, when this Commission started here, you were watching the television there and it showed you how your own soldiers killed people from the 10th til the morning of the 11th up until I stopped them by killing them myself.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="314">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Menyatsoe, I am not asking or telling you to tell me what was on the television.  I am asking you to tell me personally, when did you, I asked you earlier on, where did the AWB kill people and you said they shot two persons.  That was the morning of the 11th, you cannot now tell me that you saw on television what happened on the 10th.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="315">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	The morning of the 11th, you said that they killed two people or shot or injured, two people in front of you.  That was it.  Now you say that the AWB wants to kill the black nation and I cannot leave it there.  I have to ask this to you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="316">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="317">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	After having shot these people as I have already told you and you witnessed it yourself that after this incident there was cease fire here in Mafikeng.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="318">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>So Mr Menyatsoe, you are saying, saying to this Commission that by killing the injured, the decision you made yourself, you will stop the AWB who wants to kill the black nation.  You do not have any knowledge about the AWB.  You told me this, you do not know what their programs or principles are.  You did not want to tell me if the AWB supported apartheid or not.  You do not know anything about this but you will kill three of them.  Then all of these things that was in your head at that stage would then stop.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="319">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Lucas Mangope, that is now the next question, his government, how did Mr Mangope became the President of Bophuthatswana?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="320">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="321">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>If I tell you that he was elected as President, as a Tswana captain or chief, he was chosen as President, will you disagree with me?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="322">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="323">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>That is all that I wanted to know, just that you do not know what the answer was.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="324">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	What does one do with a President that you do not like?  How do you get rid of him, how did you perceive this?  The people wanted to go and vote, the President and his cabinet do not want to vote.  What do you do if you do not like your President or do not agree with him in Bophuthatswana?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="325">
			<speaker>ADV MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Before the applicant replies to that question, I think our, your cross-examination, Mr Terreblanche should be confined to the incident because when asking questions, you should have his evidence and even that written on paper in full context, because his evidence in chief and some under cross-examination, he did not say he was fighting for Mangope.  He said his aversion was that the AWB people, or the people he perceived to be AWB were killing his own people, that is the black people.  Now if we are going to come and say how Mangope came into power within Bophuthatswana we would be moving out of the ambient of what we have got to decide because it should be very clear that did he act with a political motive or did he give a full disclosure of his actions?  I think that would take us nearer to what we want.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="326">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, I would just like to get to the point then where the applicant decided as in the document that he did indeed acted against his own government without the instructions of any of his Commanders and that he killed people in this process.  The fact is, Mr Chairperson, that the right wing who were here, if it was the AWB or the BKA, they were here to support Mangope.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="327">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="328">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="329">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>I hesitate now to ask further questions in order to prove that the actions was not politically motivated and it was because he was scared and shocked and angry at the AWB who shot these people.  I would like to reveal the debt of his political motive if you do not allow me to do this, I will then follow the rules and leave it there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="330">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="331">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="332">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>You saw how they were burning.  You know that the Mega City has been built for the second time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="333">
			<speaker>ADV MOTATA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="334">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, Mr Menyatsoe, what is Mega City?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="335">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Mega City is the town just on the right hand side from this side, here in Mmabatho, a mole-like type of complex.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="336">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>I did not know that it was burnt down.  You will have to tell me about this.  So these people who did not like Mangope then burnt this shopping centre.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="337">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="338">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>Did they also throw stones when they blockaded the roads.  Did they break windows in shops?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="339">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Yes they barricaded the roads, they broke windows and burnt houses and shops.  They were not going to work.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="340">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>If a road is then blocked, what happens to those vehicles there?  Must they go back or must they remain there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="341">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>It will depend on the driver as to whether which direction it takes.  Everyone would take his own decision.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="342">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>The fact is that he could not continue because the road was blocked.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="343">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="344">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>In other words you had to get out of the vehicle if you wanted to get away from there.  Is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="345">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="346">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>The driver decided that he drives along this road ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="347">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="348">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Chairperson, it is relevant in the sense that according to my information and that is why I would like to put this question.  Road blocks were held when the AWB left Bophuthatswana, that stones were thrown and that out of fear, exactly what Mr Menyatsoe now answered, people protected themselves by shooting, if it was in the air or not.  Because at these road blocks if they were, could not continue, the windows would have been broken and would be then taken out of a crowd and be killed on their way back to the old South Africa.  It is very relevant to me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="349">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="350">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, I will then place it on record that Mr Menyatsoe said that there were road blocks put up.  Mr Menyatsoe is it correct if I say that to show that they are against President Mangope they also made use of road blocks and that they prevented people to continue.  I would just like to get your answer on that.  In other words then that the driver must then decide if he will get out of the car and walk or take a different route.  Is that what you said?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="351">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I said it would depend on a particular driver.  I did not know what the driver would think, what to do next in that kind of a situation.  I have explained that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="352">
			<speaker>MR TERREBLANCHE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, we then leave it there, Mr Menyatsoe.  I have got no further questions.  I am convinced that the advocates and his representatives will continue with the questions that I did not mention.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="353">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR TERREBLANCHE</text>
		</line>
		<line number="354">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Van Der Berg, do you have any questions to put to the witness?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="355">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>As it pleases you, Mr Chairperson, firstly I would like to ask forgiveness because I took out my jacket because of the heat.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="356">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="357">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairperson.  Mr Menyatsoe, do you agree that this</text>
		</line>
		<line number="358">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>incident took place on the 11th of March, 1994?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="359">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="360">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Mr Menyatsoe, when did you apply for amnesty?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="361">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="362">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Sir, will you agree with me that it was 18th January 1997?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="363">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I see the application form is dated the 8th May 1997, page 7 of the document.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="364">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>It is indeed so, yes Mr Chairperson.  Sir, when did you go and see the lawyer of human rights or the lawyers of human rights?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="365">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I saw him before I appeared before the Tebbutt Commission.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="366">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Sir, would you agree that the closing date for amnesty was 10th May. 1997.  Is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="367">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>That that was at that stage.  It was extended later, but at one stage it was the 10th of May.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="368">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Sir, then you only two days before this time was extended, you applied for amnesty.  Is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="369">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I only knew that the deadline was on that date, but I know that it was extended.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="370">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Sir, why did you go and see the lawyer for human rights?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="371">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>May you please repeat your question?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="372">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Why did you go and see the lawyer for human rights?  Who told you to go and do this, or who recommended this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="373">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I told myself.  I made that decision on my own.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="374">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>When you applied for amnesty, did you know that Sergeant Nare was charged innocently of the murder?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="375">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I knew.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="376">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>When did you know he was charged for murder?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="377">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="378">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="379">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Every person does anything he likes at the time he wants.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="380">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="381">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Can you please repeat the question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="382">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="383">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I have already told you that every person has the right to do anything he likes at his own time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="384">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Mr Menyatsoe, what you have told the Commission today, did you tell the same things to the lawyers of human rights?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="385">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="386">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Did you tell them everything you told the Commission today?  Did you tell all of that to the lawyers of human rights?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="387">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Other information surfaced because of the questions asked.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="388">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>The evidence you have given in chief, all that evidence, did you also give that to the lawyers of human rights?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="389">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>May you please repeat your question, Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="390">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Perhaps if you could just explain what evidence in chief is to the witness when you put him the question, Mr Van Der Berg.  He might not understand the term.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="391">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Mr Menyatsoe, when you initially gave your evidence before any cross-questioning actually took place, all that information which you have given to the Commission, before the cross-questioning started.  All that information, did you also give that to the lawyers of human rights?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="392">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="393">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>You also took an oath at the Tebbutt Commission on 6th May 1997, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="394">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I did not take an oath.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="395">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Sir, do you remember that proceedings took place on the 10th May in front of the Tebbutt Commission, you were there, were you not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="396">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Will you please repeat your question?  There are those I remember, there are those I do not remember.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="397">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Mr Menyatsoe, you took an oath and gave an affidavit to the Tebbutt Commission with regards to exactly what happened on the day of the 10th May when you shot these people, is that correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="398">
			<speaker>ADV MPSHE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, perhaps to assist my learned friend, the applicant did not testify before the Tebbutt Commission.  They only tabled an affidavit which was read into the record.  He was never subjected to any cross-examination, nor testimony.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="399">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="400">
			<speaker>ADV MPSHE</speaker>
			<text>It is the statement.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="401">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Is it an affidavit?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="402">
			<speaker>ADV MPSHE</speaker>
			<text>It was a statement, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="403">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes but affidavits are also statements, but was it a sworn statement or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="404">
			<speaker>MR HENDRICKSE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, this was not a sworn statement.  This was not an affidavit, it is a statement that was handed in to the Commission.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="405">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Hendrickse.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="406">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Mr Menyatsoe, the statement which you then made to the Tebbutt Commission, was that the truth or was it not the truth?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="407">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>That is the truth.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="408">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>So in the information contained in there is the truth, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="409">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I have explained that it is the truth.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="410">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Did you also explain to the Tebbutt Commission precisely what you have still explained to the Commission today before the cross-questioning today started, that means, your evidence in chief.  Did you also say exactly the same to the Tebbutt Commission?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="411">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Can you shorten your questions so that I will be able to understand what you want from that question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="412">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Mr Menyatsoe, everything you said today in your evidence in chief, did you convey it in the same way in that statement you made to the Tebbutt Commission?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="413">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I have explained that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="414">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>My question is very simple, all the information you have given today, did you give them the same information, the Tebbutt Commission that is?  Did you give them the same information?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="415">
			<speaker>MR HENDRICKSE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, maybe my learned friend can just say that this was a statement that was handed in and the applicant did not testify personally before the Tebbutt Commission.  He should not confuse the two issues.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="416">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, perhaps you can make it clear then.  I think the question that you putting, Mr Van Der Berg is, the contents of that statement which was handed in to the Tebbutt Commission, is that the same as your evidence in chief that you have given today?  Is that the question you are asking?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="417">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="418">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I have already explained that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="419">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What, what, could you just explain again.  Was it the same or did it differ?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="420">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>They are the same.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="421">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>So you agree that since the incident took place on the 11th March 1994, when the first admission on the 6th May of 1997, was already finished, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="422">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Can you please repeat your question.  Can you please repeat your question, Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="423">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Sir, it is easy, on the 6th of May, you made a statement in which you said that you shot at three AWB members, is that correct?  And it is in  that statement was made on the 6th May, 1997, is that correct?  And that is in front of the Tebbutt Commission.  That is the first time you have said in public that you shot the AWB people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="424">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="425">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>But since the incident took place, up until the time you actually came to the front, that is three years, because the incident took place in March 1994 and only in May 1997 did you come and say that you have done it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="426">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>What is your question?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="427">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Why did it take such a long time, why did three years lapse before you came to apply for amnesty?  Why did it take you so long to admit to what you have done?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="428">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I have explained firstly that I told you that a person does what he likes at his own time.  Secondly, my feelings at that, my feelings came at that time that I should reveal my responsibility to the incident.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="429">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>But in the mean time you were aware of the fact that Sergeant Nare was falsely accused of murder and you sat back for three years with out you came forward with the truth.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="430">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>That mistake which happened to Sergeant Nare, according to the investigations which were done, he was identified at the identification parade.  That is not my mistake that he was falsely accused for these murders.  He was identified there in my absence.  I did not know even know the place of the identification parade.  That is not my responsibility that he was found guilty.  That problem lies with that person who identified him, not me.  That is not my problem.  I did not identify him.  The person responsible is the one who identified him at the identification parade.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="431">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="432">
			<speaker>ADV SIGODI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="433">
			<speaker>ADV MOTATA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="434">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="435">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I think that is certainly a question for argument that you can use but perhaps it would be, it would be established when the Sergeant was prosecuted.  I mean if the Sergeant was prosecuted in April 1997, then that argument is weak.  If he is prosecuted in 1994 then that might be stronger.  Do you know, do you have any idea when it was made public that the other man was going to be prosecuted for this killing?  Perhaps that can be established.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="436">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Can I just come in here.  I just want to clarify this, you do not submit that regret is a requirement for amnesty.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="437">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>With all respect, no, but it is a question of his credibility.  Today he is saying that he has regret today but I know that is not one of the requirements.  Chairperson, later on I might get back to this point once we have covered more information regarding this but for the time being I will leave it there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="438">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Menyatsoe, when you were questioned by the police with regards to the death of the deceased, when were you the first time approached by the police?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="439">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>May you please repeat your question again, Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="440">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Mr Menyatsoe, I will make it easy for you.  Did the police approach you and question you about the death of the three AWB members?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="441">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Yes that is correct.  They came.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="442">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Was it around the 16th or 17th April, 1997?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="443">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="444">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Can you remember the year?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="445">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="446">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Can you remember how long it was before you went to the lawyers of human rights?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="447">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>They came before I consulted the lawyers for human rights.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="448">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>You cannot remember how long before that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="449">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="450">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Mr Menyatsoe, is that not after the police questioned you, that you then went to the lawyers of human rights and then applied for amnesty?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="451">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I have explained that those police came to me before I met a lawyer for human rights.  Then on that day I sought a lawyer in the presence of the police.   I made them to contact my lawyer, then when we left them, they left.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="452">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Mr Menyatsoe, because it seems to me that if you were not questioned by the police you would not have admitted what you have done.  Is that correct?  In other words you took a chance.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="453">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="454">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Sir I do not understand your answer, could you please repeat it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="455">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>My answer is, I disagree with you.  You did not know what were my intentions or my intentions of coming to this Commission would actually occur to me.  As I did not know as well, because it just occurred to me unexpectedly.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="456">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>What did you not yourself know?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="457">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I did not know as to when will the feeling or the intentions occur to me to come in front of this Commission.  Maybe just explain it in this way, I would not know what my intentions or what I would do in the next hour.  I cannot anticipate.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="458">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>In other words you just felt that now you must admit.  So it was just a feeling and that is why you admitted and applied for amnesty.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="459">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, the feelings came at their own time and when the moment came, I decided to come forward to this Commission.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="460">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Mr Menyatsoe, is it your case that you acted in self-defence and also to protect innocent civilians?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="461">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="462">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Sir, when the police came to question you for the first time, that was  16th or 17th April, I can provide you with the evidence of the Captain.  Did you ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="463">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Is that 1997?   (Push your button again)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="464">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Indeed so, Mr Chairman, that was in 1997.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="465">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	When the police came to question you did you then go and get an automatic rifle from the store or the ammunition depot?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="466">
			<speaker>MR HENDRICKSE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, with due respect, I do not understand this question?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="467">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Perhaps he can repeat the question.  I think the question as I understood it was, it was put to the witness that the police went to him on the 16th or 17th April, 1997 and when they went to him he was taken, or could you just repeat that last bit - was he taken or did the witness take the police to a store where a firearm was shown.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="468">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Sir, I will repeat my question in a different manner.  When you heard that the police are looking for you concerning the death of the three AWB members, did you go and get a R4 or R3 rifle from the storeroom?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="469">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Let me put it this way, on that particular day I was somewhere else and when I arrived at home somebody told me that four policemen came looking for me and I wanted to know what it was in connection with.  They told me the policemen were from Mafikeng and they were in company of another policeman who is my colleague in Thaba N&#039;Chu. I asked this particular policeman as to who these policemen are and what is this in connection with.  He said to me that they said that they wanted me in connection with some work here in Mafikeng and I went back to my home and on my arrival there as I was sitting I heard a knock and it was people and when they entered it was two of my Captains and these three policemen and two white people and another Inspector Racudu.  The Captain told me that these men are policemen and they are looking for you regarding the, what happened in 1994 and I asked my Captain as to do you believe yourself that these people are policemen and he said yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="470">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I showed them my ID card that I am a policeman.  So I asked them to produce their cards as well.  They were standing next to the door and they had firearms in their waist and standing by the door they said that this bloody bastard does not cooperate. They said that in Afrikaans, in their language and this showed me or it came to me that it was not safe to go with these people although I did not know what was it was actually all about.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="471">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Although I had asked my Captain and he just told me that it is about what happened in 1994 in Mafikeng. Then I asked him, exactly what of the 1994 happenings?  I asked them to go out and they did that and I phoned my lawyer but what is surprising is that they told me that the following day, I must appear in front of the Tebbutt Commission.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="472">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	According to my knowledge, at that time the Tebbutt Commission was on recess.  I spoke to the lawyer and when I told him that they are taking me to the Tebbutt Commission he wondered as to which commission are they are talking about because the Tebbutt Commission is in recess.  He said I must let him speak to one of them on the phone and I gave them the phone and he did.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="473">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	And they went away and waited for me at the police station thereafter.  I sat and had a discussion with my lawyer who advised me not to go with these people and he will try to talk to them so they should wait for you there at the Tebbutt Commission and I will bring you there, but you must not go with them.  That was the advice from my lawyer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="474">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did you at any stage get an R4 rifle from a  storeroom or an R3?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="475">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="476">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Mr Menyatsoe, there is a bundle prepared with all the affidavits and documents in.  I want you to page to page 27 of this bundle.  Have you got such a bundle in front of you?  Have you got the bundle in front of you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="477">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Yes</text>
		</line>
		<line number="478">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Is that the statement you gave to the Tebbutt Commission?  It begins at the top of the page.  Is that the statement that you made to the Tebbutt Commission?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="479">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="480">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Is the content thereof correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="481">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="482">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="483">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Yes I see that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="484">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>In other words, your main duty was as a guard of this General, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="485">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I was a policeman and my duty was to guard this General.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="486">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>If you look at the following sentence, it starts with, &quot;On the 10th March, 1994, at about 2200 hours I was sleeping at my place when my neighbour who was in the Bophuthatswana Defence Force came to my place.  He informed me about the presence of the armed AWB members at the  Bophuthatswana Air Force Base.  He said that they had virtually taken over from the regular  Bophuthatswana army.  He informed me that the near presence of the AWB was not acceptable to the  Bophuthatswana Defence Force members.&quot;  Is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="487">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="488">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="489">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Am I also correct that if your neighbour did not inform you about this you would not have been aware of this fact?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="490">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, according to him I would not have known.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="491">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Is it also correct that at that stage you did not know anything about the AWB or about their presence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="492">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I heard about these for the first time from this man.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="493">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="494">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="495">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>If you look at page 27, the third line from the bottom.  It is written,</text>
		</line>
		<line number="496" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;They had virtually taken over from the regular  Bophuthatswana army.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="497">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="498">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I am referring to the AWB.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="499">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Is it correct to say that the AWB enforcement was at the Army base at that time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="500">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I only heard about the AWB.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="501">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>But you know that the Volksfront was there as well.  Today we know that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="502">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Please repeat your question, Sir</text>
		</line>
		<line number="503">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Today we know, Mr Menyatsoe, that the AWB as well as the Volksfront, that the specific evening, both of them were there at the Air Force Base.  Is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="504">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, today we know.  That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="505">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>You were not aware yourself that the AWB actually took over the  Bophuthatswana Defence Force.  Is that correct?  It is only what your neighbour told you.  You did not carry any knowledge of this on your own.  It is, you learnt everything from your neighbour.  Is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="506">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I think he has said that Mr Van Der Berg.  We can accept that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="507">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>As it pleases you.  Is it also correct that your neighbour told you that the mere presence of the AWB was not acceptable to the black Bophuthatswana Defence Force members?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="508">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="509">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="510">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Please repeat that question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="511">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Look on page 27, second last sentence from the bottom, it begins with, &quot;He informed me that mere presence of the AWB was not acceptable to the local Defence Force members.&quot;  Now I am telling you that it is your neighbour who was unhappy about this, not you with regards to the presence of the AWB.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="512">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Yes according to this sentence that is his feeling that he was against their presence because he is a soldier.  I am not a soldier.  I am a policeman.  So it is his feeling expressed here.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="513">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="514">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I explained that this disturbed me because of the fact that they took over the Defence Force.  Simply because us as the police, cannot do anything if the backbone of the security, which is the Defence Force has been taken over, I would not know what was going to happen to us at the ultimate end.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="515">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Did it bother you in any sense that your neighbour told you that the AWB took over the Defence Force.  Did this bother you, the fact that the Defence Force was taken over by the AWB?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="516">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="517">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="518">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I have already responded to that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="519">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>The information, did you try and verify this information your neighbour gave you to make sure that it is in fact correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="520">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="521">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>It seems that later on, ? , he had already made up his mind to put it that way about what he would do the next day.  The point of the issue is, the clarity he had was based on the here say which he received from his neighbours.  These are the two allegations.  That is why it is now important whether he verified this information or not.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="522">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="523">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I get back to this aspect later.  Mr Menyatsoe, if the AWB came, were they there at the invitation of the government in  Bophuthatswana?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="524">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Please repeat the question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="525">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>The AWB, were they in Mmabatho on the invitation of the government in  Bophuthatswana?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="526">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I have explained earlier on that I did not know what was the purpose of the AWB and who called them.  I have previously explained that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="527">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>So you are saying now, that you do not know whether they invited to go there or not.  Is that what you are saying?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="528">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>You are repeating the same question.  I told you that I did not know.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="529">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>In the bundle on page 3, if you look there, paragraph 10a to the very last paragraph.  I am going to read this to you, the last paragraph. It reads as follows, &quot;I believe that on the invitation of the Bop government the right wingers, including the AWB and AVF came to Bophuthatswana.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="530">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	According to your own version, the AWB was there on the invitation from the Bop government.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="531">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>It is so, they came here and they attacked the people of Bophuthatswana.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="532">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But I think what is being put to you by Mr Van Der Berg is that, stressing that it was on the invitation of the Bophuthatswana government that they went.  Because it says, &quot;I believe that on the invitation of the Bop government the right wingers came to Bophuthatswana&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="533">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="534">
			<speaker>ADV MOTATA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="535">
			<speaker>ADV SIGODI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="536">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Mr Menyatsoe, can you then tell the Commission when did you learn that the AWB came to Bophuthatswana on the invitation of the Bop government?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="537">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I knew before writing the statement.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="538">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Menyatsoe, was it before or after the incident that you got to know whether the, whether it was at the invitation of the Bop government?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="539">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I learnt about this on the 11th, on the day of this incident.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="540">
			<speaker>ADV MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Was it, sorry ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="541">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Was it, sorry.  Was it before or after the shooting that you learnt about it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="542">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>It was before the shooting.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="543">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>How did you determine that, Mr Menyatsoe?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="544">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>It is because of the fact that we were told that the AWB were killing people and also what I saw happening in front of my eyes, the AWB shooting people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="545">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Mr Menyatsoe, if you look on page 10 of the bundle, paragraph 1.1 to 1.4, was that political goals that you are submitting to the Commission?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="546">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="547">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="548">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, Mr Menyatsoe, what is the TTA?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="549">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, TTA is stood for Tswana Territorial Authority.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="550">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="551">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>So was you instructions not to leave the camp.  Is that correct?  Your instructions was not to leave the camp, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="552">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="553">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Was your instruction not to leave the camp?  Is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="554">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>How many times, I think he said it twice.  The instructions were not ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="555">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="556">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, the answer was in the positive.  The instructions were not to leave the camp and the answer was &quot;Yes&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="557">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Mr Menyatsoe, you agree with me that when you shot the AWB members that attacks at that stage was already finished, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="558">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Please repeat your question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="559">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="560" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I went to the kitchen to have my lunch. As I was having lunch with colleagues I heard gunshots fired from outside the building.  The shooting was continuous and I became worried about my safety.  We then decided to go outside to see what was happening.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="561">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, what is the question?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="562">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>How long did this firing last?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="563">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I cannot recall at all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="564">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Can you give us an indication.  Was it a few seconds, was it a minute?  How long was this firing?  How long did it last?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="565">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I do not recall.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="566">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Sir, when you walked to the blue Mercedes was the shooting, did the shooting stop at that stage?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="567">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>The shooting was continuous.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="568">
			<speaker>MR HENDRICKSE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="569">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I take it, I understood, just confirm it and also confirm it with the witness that when you say, when you walked to the blue Mercedes Benz, that is after the occupants had got out of the vehicle and you went towards them when they were lying on the ground. Is that the stage you asking about?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="570">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>The time at which I am referring to now is that vehicles drove past and then shooting occurred, that shooting incident did not take very long, then it stopped.  That is when the Mercedes Benz stopped and when the Mercedes stopped then there were no more shots fired ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="571">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>That was after he himself had shot at the Mercedes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="572">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Yes, indeed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="573">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>It is at this stage, so the question is, when you walked up to the blue Mercedes Benz at the stage when the three men were out of the vehicle, had the shooting stopped at that stage?  Is that the question?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="574">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Indeed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="575">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I have explained that there was shots going on at that time continuously.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="576">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>When did it stop?  At one stage or at some stage it had to stop.  When did this occur?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="577">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="578">
			<speaker>ADV MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Just to interpose, Mr Van Der Berg.  Mr Menyatsoe, when you went to the Mercedes and these three gentlemen you perceived or who you were aware were AWB members, when you went to them, was there still shooting occurring?  When you went to them and they had been outside the Mercedes Benz?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="579">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, there was still gun firing.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="580">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Where did the shots came from?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="581">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I do not know but I just heard the noise, the firing.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="582">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Did it come from the blue Mercedes Benz?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="583">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I said I do not know, I just heard the gun firing continuing.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="584">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>So in other words, while you were hearing the gun shots you were walking towards the blue Mercedes Benz, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="585">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I said that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="586">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>And when you got there, at this Mercedes Benz, were there still gun shots fired?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="587">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>When I arrived at the Mercedes, I do not recall clearly as to whether there was gun firing because I was nervous and very agitated and I was concentrating on these three men.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="588">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Sir, it seems as if you just, if you can just remember things if it suits you.  When you arrived there you should have, you should know what happened.  People, were there shots fired there where the people were lying next to the car?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="589">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="590">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Sir, when you arrived at the Mercedes Benz, you immediately shot these three men, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="591">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>He said that there was a bit of conversation, well not conversation but talk took place before he shot.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="592">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Indeed so, yes Mr Chairperson.  Sir, you then arrived at this blue Mercedes Benz, you then questioned the people lying there, you interviewed him, interviewed them, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="593">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I have long dealt with that answer, Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="594">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>I would like you to answer it again.  I am asking you a question, you sat there and had an interview with them, you asked them questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="595">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, there was a conversation between us and I shot them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="596">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Before we get to the shooting when you sat there and talking to them, there was no danger, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="597">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="598">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Sir that was not my question.  It was, when you got there, there was no danger, is that correct?  Otherwise you would have shot immediately?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="599">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>According to me, there was still some danger.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="600">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>What danger?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="601">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>They could kill me, those people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="602">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>But not necessarily.  Did you saw any security forces who disarmed some of the AWB members?  Were you present when this happened?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="603">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I did not see that.  I never saw any policemen or any defence force member disarming these people.  I saw nobody.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="604">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="605">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I saw nothing of that sort.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="606">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>When you got to the Mercedes Benz, were the AWB members getting out of the car?  What was the situation?  Was they already out and lying on the ground?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="607">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I would not tell you of the positions.  They were, I was not able to see the situation.  It was difficult.  It was not easy.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="608">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>So when you got there, after the shooting, you immediately moved towards the vehicle, is that not true?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="609">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>Which shooting Sir?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="610">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="611">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="612">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, indeed.  So I did not think he waited for the shooting to stop, but when the Mercedes Benz stopped there, he walked towards the vehicle.  That is how I understood his evidence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="613">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="614">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Indeed Sir, but Mr Menyatsoe, when you got to this Mercedes Benz can you remember if they were getting out of the car, were they inside of the car or outside?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="615">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>They were getting outside the car?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="616">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Then they went to go and lie next to the vehicle, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="617">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="618">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>How long before the Mercedes Benz stopped and before you shot them, what was the time span between these two occurrences?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="619">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Is all this very relevant, Mr Van Der Beg?  It sounds like we are getting into the sort of detail that one normally gets into in a criminal trial.  How far were you standing from there, how long between this and how, what is the purpose of this cross-examination?  Whether it was twenty seconds or thirty seconds, does it make any difference?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="620">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="621">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Menyatsoe, how long did it take before the Mercedes Benz stopped and the people </text>
		</line>
		<line number="622">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>got out, what was the time span?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="623">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="624">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>The Tebbutt Commission accepted or found that approximately twenty minutes expired, as well as on the television.  We saw that Mr Uys said that they were calling for assistance for approximately fifteen minutes.  Is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="625">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="626">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Van Der Berg can you just indicate where it is documented, which part that it was twenty minutes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="627">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>If you can just give me a moment.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="628">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Chairperson, if we look at Volume one of the Tebbutt Commission on page 152, it says there, under last part ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="629">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>We are not in possession of that, but if you could give the reference, Volume one,..</text>
		</line>
		<line number="630">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Volume one, page 152, that is the last part of the page, &quot;The men had lain outside their car for fifteen to twenty minutes before they were shot.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="631">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Menyatsoe, did the media also have interviews there or do you not know anything about that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="632">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>On that day, I saw only three AWB members, during that incident of the shooting.  After that I left.  I did not see anybody.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="633">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, just a moment.  Sir, would you say that at the stage when you shot them, would you say that at that stage there was a war situation going on?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="634">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I said the incident of that day was the situation of war.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="635">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>Sir, I am talking specifically at that moment when you shot them, at that stage, was there a state of war or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="636">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>According to me it was the state of war.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="637">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text>What was the state of war to which you are referring to now, at that stage?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="638">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>I was afraid that those people would kill me any minute.  Anything could have happened from them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="639">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Menyatsoe, let me put it to you this way, who were the two parties you perceived to be at war?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="640">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>When it comes to parties, it will create a problem.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="641">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Well I think maybe that word might have misled you, but who were the two sides in the war?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="642">
			<speaker>MR MENYATSOE</speaker>
			<text>AWB was fighting against the Bophuthatswana population, nation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="643">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER BERG</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="644">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="645">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="646">
			<speaker>ADV MPSHE</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, Mr Chairman, for your indulgence.  A question was asked as to when was Mr Nare prosecuted.  He was scheduled to appear, he was indicted before the High Court of Bophuthatswana, the week starting the 13th March, 1995 and the charges were then suspended on the 31st May, 1995 for him to, for the Tebbutt Commission to finalise its report.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="647">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="648">
			<speaker>ADV MPSHE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, further on another aspect, the issue of the two journalists.  My learned friend as I put it on record, indicated that by lunch time we shall be knowing whether  they need them or not.  I have to know, Mr Chairman, because they may be making arrangements to be here tomorrow morning and they are flying from Cape Town ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="649">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="650">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>