<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY HEARING</type>
	<startdate>1998-11-19</startdate>
	<location>WELKOM</location>
	<day>1</day>
	<names>DANIEL WILHELM VAN DER WATT</names>
	<case>AM 3673/96</case>
						<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=52986&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/1998/981119_wlk_981119awb.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="156">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>ON RESUMPTION</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, thank you.  Just before the lunch adjournment we concluded the evidence of Mr Botes.  Mr Loubscher?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker>MR LOUBSCHER</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairman.  I then now call Mr van der Watt.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>DANIEL WILHELM VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Loubscher?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MR LOUBSCHER</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr van der Watt, during the second half of 1993 you were a member of the AWB?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>MR LOUBSCHER</speaker>
			<text>Did you have any rank?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>No rank at all, no.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>MR LOUBSCHER</speaker>
			<text>Were you also a member of the Volksfront?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker>MR LOUBSCHER</speaker>
			<text>You listened to the evidence of Mr Labuschagne about how he gave you and Mr Botes instructions and how you went with him to several different places and you placed explosive devices there which exploded.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker>MR LOUBSCHER</speaker>
			<text>Do you confirm his evidence in this regard?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>MR LOUBSCHER</speaker>
			<text>You also heard what he said about the reasons why you acted the way you did?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>MR LOUBSCHER</speaker>
			<text>Do you confirm that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I do.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>MR LOUBSCHER</speaker>
			<text>Mr van der Watt, you submitted an application for amnesty which is signed on the 7th of December 1995, and you will find it on page 43 up to 55 of the bundle.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>MR LOUBSCHER</speaker>
			<text>Maybe just to make sure we know everything, you and Labuschagne and Botes were arrested for all the acts which you committed and you were prosecuted?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>MR LOUBSCHER</speaker>
			<text>And the charge sheet is relevant to all the incidents for which you ask for amnesty?  It&#039;s on page 63 up 84 of the bundle.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker>MR LOUBSCHER</speaker>
			<text>Now on page 56 up to page 59 there is another amnesty application by you and it was signed in May 1997.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>MR LOUBSCHER</speaker>
			<text>Your first one was handed in in December 1996, so how did it come about that this amnesty application was signed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>Labuschagne brought it to us and told us to sign it and that it&#039;s coming from General Viljoen.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker>MR LOUBSCHER</speaker>
			<text>Did you then fill in the handwritten parts in that document and also sign it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>MR LOUBSCHER</speaker>
			<text>Was it at any time your intention that this document would replace your first amnesty application?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker>MR LOUBSCHER</speaker>
			<text>Mr van der Watt, can I please take you to, remind you of charge number 6.  You will remember that this is the explosive device which was placed at the black township of Viljoenskroon.  Were you personally involved in the placing of the device?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker>MR LOUBSCHER</speaker>
			<text>Was anyone else involved?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>Me and Mr Botes were together.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker>MR LOUBSCHER</speaker>
			<text>Now the suggestion was made that this explosive device was deliberately placed right next to the wall of a corrugated iron shack, what is your comment on that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, it was very dark, it rained a lot, we didn&#039;t look where we placed it.  There was also a fence there.  We only placed it and we went back.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker>MR LOUBSCHER</speaker>
			<text>Can you say today how close you placed that explosive device to that hut?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, Mr Loubscher.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Did you climb through the fence before you placed it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Where about in relation to the fence did you place it, the side that you came from or on the other side of the fence, can you remember?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>It was on the other side of the fence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker>DR TSOTSI</speaker>
			<text>Did you have to cross the fence before putting the device in place or did you do it from outside the fence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>I leaned over the fence and I placed the bomb, I did it from the other side.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker>MR LOUBSCHER</speaker>
			<text>Mr van der Watt, who in the group of three of you decided when and where explosive devices would be placed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>We got all our instructions from Labuschagne.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker>MR LOUBSCHER</speaker>
			<text>Was there ever at any stage any other motive involved with the placing of these devices, other than the furthering of a Volkstaat idea, on behalf of the Volksfront?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker>MR LOUBSCHER</speaker>
			<text>Did you ever financially gain anything from the placing of these devices?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>No, not at all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker>MR LOUBSCHER</speaker>
			<text>Did you place any of these devices because of personal malice or anger?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>No, I did not.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker>MR LOUBSCHER</speaker>
			<text>Mr van der Watt, you also prepared an affidavit?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker>MR LOUBSCHER</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, may we mark this as C?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="61">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, thank you, Mr Labuschagne, we will mark it as Exhibit C.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="62">
			<speaker>MR LOUBSCHER</speaker>
			<text>Do you confirm the contents of your affidavit as correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="63">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I do.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="64">
			<speaker>MR LOUBSCHER</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="65">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR LOUBSCHER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="66">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Mr Taka, do you have any questions to ask the witness?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="67">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR TAKA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson, I have.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="68">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr van der Watt, let&#039;s go back to the placing of the bomb in Viljoenskroon.  You say that you placed the bomb over the fence?  In other words, if I understand you correctly your were on the roadside and you put it over the fence into the premises of that corrugated iron shack, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="69">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="70">
			<speaker>MR TAKA</speaker>
			<text>You were under express instructions to avoid injury, bodily injury and death, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="71">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="72">
			<speaker>MR TAKA</speaker>
			<text>Now by placing the bomb over the fence you were placing it closer to the fence, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="73">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I couldn&#039;t see properly, it was very dark.  I don&#039;t know how far it was from the shack.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="74">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, but I think it&#039;s fairly obvious - well unless, if the fence was the fence around the shack, if you place it over, it must have been closer to the shack than the side of the fence that you were standing on.  Do you know that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="75">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>I do not know what the exact distance was between the shack and the fence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="76">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But you came through veld to get where you were, or did you have to pass other shacks to get to where you were where you placed the bomb?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="77">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, it was on the outside of the township, it was not inside the township itself.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="78">
			<speaker>MR TAKA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="79">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	This fence, what did it separate, was it surrounding a particular shack or a group of shacks?  What exactly was between - what was the fence separating?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="80">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, it was very dark.  It looked to me as if the fence went around all the huts, not only one.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="81">
			<speaker>MR TAKA</speaker>
			<text>But would it be correct to say that it was separating for example the road and the huts or the shacks?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="82">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="83">
			<speaker>MR TAKA</speaker>
			<text>So that if you go beyond the shack beyond the fence from the road&#039;s side - if you were beyond the fence itself from the road&#039;s side, you were moving closer to a shack or a hut?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="84">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>It was very dark, I really couldn&#039;t see well.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="85">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But it wasn&#039;t your intention was it, to place the bomb in the middle of open veld not close to any abode, any residence, any shack?  Did you know there were shacks there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="86">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="87">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And did you know more or less where the shacks were?  Did you know that there were shacks on the other side of the fence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="88">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="89">
			<speaker>MR TAKA</speaker>
			<text>So if you knew that there were shacks beyond the fence, then you knew that beyond the fence you were moving closer to the shacks?  Because you knew that there were shacks beyond this fence, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="90">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, we didn&#039;t want to climb through the fence.  We acted as quick as possible.  We placed the bomb and we immediately retreated.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="91">
			<speaker>MR TAKA</speaker>
			<text>Why did you not put the bomb this side of the fence and not beyond the fence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="92">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>If we placed it on our side of the fence it would have been closer to the field, the veld.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="93">
			<speaker>MR TAKA</speaker>
			<text>An open veld?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="94">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="95">
			<speaker>MR TAKA</speaker>
			<text>And what was wrong in the bomb being closer to the veld?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="96">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>If it was in the open field it would have created less propaganda.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="97">
			<speaker>MR TAKA</speaker>
			<text>So you put it closer to the shacks so that you could get maximum propaganda, am I right?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="98">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="99">
			<speaker>MR TAKA</speaker>
			<text>You realise that moving it closer to the shacks increases the risk of injury and even death at the explosion of the bomb?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="100">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="101">
			<speaker>MR TAKA</speaker>
			<text>And you consciously and deliberately moved away from the veld closer to the shack?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="102">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>It was not deliberate.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="103">
			<speaker>MR TAKA</speaker>
			<text>That bomb in Viljoenskroon cost bodily injury to at least three people, Margaret Malinga who has lost her hearing, Steven Semelo and Andries Semelo.  Is it not possible that if you had placed the bomb further from the shacks it would have cause less injuries because it was then closer to the veld?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="104">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="105">
			<speaker>MR TAKA</speaker>
			<text>Were you also involved in the placing of a bomb in the street in Wesselsbron?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="106">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="107">
			<speaker>MR TAKA</speaker>
			<text>Who decided on the exact location of the bomb in Wesselsbron?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="108">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>We drove into the township, we placed the bomb outside the car in the street.  I can&#039;t remember who placed the bomb.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="109">
			<speaker>MR TAKA</speaker>
			<text>That bomb also caused injury to Maria Bayo and also to a one and a half year old baby, Seipati Mokodutlo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="110">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Could you just repeat that name please?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="111">
			<speaker>MR TAKA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, Seipati and the surname is Mokodutlo: M-O-K-O-D-U-T-L-O.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="112">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Now it injured little Seipati on her left knee and also twisted the patella of her knee, were you aware of that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="113">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="114">
			<speaker>MR TAKA</speaker>
			<text>But that bomb also caused severe damage to at least six residential areas around the place from where it was located in Wesselsbron, were you aware of that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="115">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="116">
			<speaker>MR TAKA</speaker>
			<text>Could you foresee that placing such a bomb at such a place could have consequences like that, body injury and damage to property?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="117">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>The bomb could have caused great damage, yes Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="118">
			<speaker>MR TAKA</speaker>
			<text>You did foresee that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="119">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="120">
			<speaker>MR TAKA</speaker>
			<text>You acted only under strict orders from Labuschagne, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="121">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="122">
			<speaker>MR TAKA</speaker>
			<text>And those orders were amongst other things to avoid injury and death, is that so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="123">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="124">
			<speaker>MR TAKA</speaker>
			<text>Now if your actions caused severe injury for example, then they were not part of the order that was given to you, do you agree with me?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="125">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="126">
			<speaker>MR TAKA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairperson, I have no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="127">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR TAKA</text>
		</line>
		<line number="128">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Taka.  Mr Mapoma, do you have any questions to ask the witness?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="129">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson, I have no questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="130">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR MAPOMA</text>
		</line>
		<line number="131">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Loubscher, do you have any re-examination?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="132">
			<speaker>MR LOUBSCHER</speaker>
			<text>I have no re-examination, thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="133">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO RE-EXAMINATION BY MR LOUBSCHER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="134">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Doctor Tsotsi, do you have any questions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="135">
			<speaker>DR TSOTSI</speaker>
			<text>No questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="136">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Sibanyoni?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="137">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>No questions, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="138">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr van der Watt, you get bombs and bombs.  You get some big bombs and you get smaller bombs, how would you describe the bomb that was placed, let&#039;s say at Viljoenskroon and the one at Wesselsbron?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="139">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, we never measured the explosives, we never knew how much explosive was actually put in the bomb.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="140">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Would you say that the bomb at Wesselsbron and the bomb at Viljoenskroon were the same size?  Did you use the same recipe as it were or was the one much larger than the other?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="141">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, according to the containers, Viljoenskroon&#039;s bomb was bigger than that of Wesselsbron. ...(end of tape)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="142">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Are you still a member of the AWB?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="143">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson, it was that time when Mr Labuschagne joined the Volksfront and I did the same.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="144">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Do you mean when Mr Labuschagne stopped being a member of the AWB?  I was under the impression Mr Labuschagne at one stage was a member of the AWB and the Volksfront at the same time, or don&#039;t you know?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="145">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>I do not know.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="146">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Loubscher, do you have any questions arising?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="147">
			<speaker>MR LOUBSCHER</speaker>
			<text>None, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="148">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR LOUBSCHER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="149">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Taka?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="150">
			<speaker>MR TAKA</speaker>
			<text>None, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="151">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR TAKA</text>
		</line>
		<line number="152">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mapoma?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="153">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>None, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="154">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr van der Watt, that concludes your testimony, you may stand down.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="155">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER WATT</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="156">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>