<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY HEARING</type>
	<startdate>1998-11-30</startdate>
	<location>JISS CENTRE, JOHANNESBURG</location>
	<day>3</day>
	<names>PERRY NHLANHLA DLAMINI</names>
	<case>AM 7239/97</case>
						<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=53081&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/1998/9811241202_jhb_981130ji.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="117">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker>MR MAKANJEE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, we call Perry Nhlanhla Dlamini, applicant number 7239/97.  It&#039;s on page 30 of volume two, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Chairperson, if we could just get some clarity.  What channel does the witness use to hear in Zulu.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker>INTERPRETER</speaker>
			<text>The Zulu is 4.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>MR MAKANJEE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Dlamini, which language do you prefer to use?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker>MR DLAMINI</speaker>
			<text>Zulu.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker>PERRY NHLANHLA DLAMINI</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, be seated.  Yes, proceed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MR MAKANJEE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Dlamini, you&#039;re applying for amnesty, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>MR DLAMINI</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>MR MAKANJEE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Dlamini, do you belong to any political party?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker>MR DLAMINI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I do.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>MR MAKANJEE</speaker>
			<text>What is the name of the political party you belong to?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker>MR DLAMINI</speaker>
			<text>ANC/SACP.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>MR MAKANJEE</speaker>
			<text>Can you tell the Committee what offences you are applying for amnesty for?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>MR DLAMINI</speaker>
			<text>In 1990, me and comrade Themba Xaba, Bafana Baloi and Jacky Macheo, we attacked Mr Msizi&#039;s house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker>MR MAKANJEE</speaker>
			<text>You mentioned comrade Xaba, is that the applicant who testified prior to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>MR DLAMINI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>MR MAKANJEE</speaker>
			<text>Very briefly would you tell us the events itself that led you to making this amnesty application?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>MR DLAMINI</speaker>
			<text>It was myself, comrade Themba, Jacky Macheo and Bafana Baloi.  In 1990 we attacked Mr Msizi&#039;s house, we threw petrol bombs.  We did so because Msizi was one of the councillors who used to harass and give hardships to the community.  It includes arresting people and evicting people from their houses.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>MR MAKANJEE</speaker>
			<text>Did Mr Msizi belong to any particular political party?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>MR DLAMINI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he was a member of the IFP and we considered him as someone who was collaborating with the apartheid regime at the time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker>MR MAKANJEE</speaker>
			<text>Who was present at Mr Msizi&#039;s house when you threw the petrol bombs at the house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>MR DLAMINI</speaker>
			<text>There was - comrade Themba Xaba was a commander and he is the one who went and checked and he reported back to us that the police who were guarding Mr Msizi&#039;s house had just left.  Then we took the chance to go and attack Mr Msizi&#039;s house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	We were not sure as to who was there because we didn&#039;t check, except for Themba Xaba but Msizi was inside the house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker>MR MAKANJEE</speaker>
			<text>So am I correct then in saying that the offences which you are applying for amnesty for are in fact arson and attempted murder, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker>MR DLAMINI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>MR MAKANJEE</speaker>
			<text>You have heard the counsel for Mr Msizi testify to the fact that Mr Msizi&#039;s family was present at the time of the petrol bombing, can you comment on that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker>MR DLAMINI</speaker>
			<text>I can&#039;t comment on that but for what we received from Themba, since he was the commander and he was the one who was checking and searching every information.  He is the one who told us that Msizi was alone in his house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker>MR MAKANJEE</speaker>
			<text>Are there any other offences for which you wish to apply for amnesty?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker>MR DLAMINI</speaker>
			<text>No, nothing.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>MR MAKANJEE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR MAKANJEE</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Before we proceed I would like to mention to you a few problems that I&#039;ve got.  In the application he is applying for amnesty for the general defence of the township.  Dates</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Between the 28th of February 1991 up to 1992.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>A very exact starting date being given.  Now he&#039;s applying for an offence which was committed in 1990.  Apart from that, on the next page:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;State whether any person was injured or suffered any damage.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>No name mentioned, no victims mentioned.  Wasn&#039;t he all the way aware of who the victim was, and why didn&#039;t he mention this in his application?  And this application was attested to that it&#039;s the truth that is mentioned herein.  So how did it come - why does he remember the name of the victim today and he didn&#039;t put it in at the stage of his application?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker>MR MAKANJEE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chair.  My instructions are that this application, along with the bulk of the applications that are before the Panel, were made as a general submission to avoid missing the deadline for such amnesty applications.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But that doesn&#039;t help with the specific dates which are mentioned in the application.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>PROBLEMS WITH SOUND EQUIPMENT</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker>MR MAKANJEE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, my instructions are that the form was filled in erroneously, the date was meant to be 28.02.1990 till 1992.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>When you signed that -  Mr Dlamini, you signed this document, not so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker>MR DLAMINI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I did sign.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Is that your signature on page 35?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker>MR DLAMINI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that&#039;s my signature.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And you signed it to signify that you are aware of the contents of this document?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker>MR DLAMINI</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And at that time when you signed it you found nothing wrong with the document, not so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker>MR DLAMINI</speaker>
			<text>No, I didn&#039;t notice, we were in a hurry.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Why in a hurry?  This is a document that affects your future, it affects your life, not so?  It is even more important than your ID document.  By the way, who assisted you in filling in this, or did you do it on your own?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker>MR DLAMINI</speaker>
			<text>I did it myself and Sally helped us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Who is Sally?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker>MR DLAMINI</speaker>
			<text>Sally Sealey.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And she was there when you filled in this form?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker>MR DLAMINI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, she was there but she was standing by at the side.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And you signed this knowing full well what the contents of this document was.  You were satisfied that this document reflected what you wanted it to reflect right up till 10 minutes ago?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker>MR DLAMINI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I was satisfied.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So you knew full well that you are applying for incidents that occurred between the 28th of February 1991 to, in your favour, the 31st of December 1992, correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="61">
			<speaker>MR DLAMINI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I knew.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="62">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Makanjee, what is the position?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="63">
			<speaker>MR MAKANJEE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, if I could ...(no sound) again please.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="64">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MACHINE SWITCHED OFF</text>
		</line>
		<line number="65">
			<speaker>MR MAKANJEE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, my instructions are again that my client at the time of filling in this form did so in a hurried manner ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="66">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>We accept that, we have sympathy for that, we&#039;ll even find that, how does that help?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="67">
			<speaker>MR MAKANJEE</speaker>
			<text>With regards to the dates supplied for the ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="68">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You cannot amend the application, you can supplement it.  Now how does one supplement this to bring it in line with a successful application?  I have difficulty to perceived that.  That it could have been a mistake or is a mistake, well I have sympathy for that but the fact of the matter is I&#039;m stuck with it, or this Committee is stuck with it, you are stuck with it, the applicant is stuck with it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="69">
			<speaker>MR MAKANJEE</speaker>
			<text>We cannot change the facts that the applicant has testified to already.  We will argue in our closing argument on why Mr Dlamini&#039;s testimony should be accepted to fall within the ambit of his application form.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="70">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Makanjee, either we have a proper application before us or not, because I have to decide now, depending on what you insist on, whether there is an application before us which entitles other people to cross-examine or not.  If we haven&#039;t got a proper application then there&#039;s no point carrying on.  If we do have, well then we&#039;ve got to go through the full business.  If you can persuade me that this is a proper application, I&#039;ll gladly allow the matter to go through.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="71">
			<speaker>MR MAKANJEE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="72">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>...(inaudible) to make it quite easy, and I hope your client can understand it, is that he could very well testify now about incidents that occurred between the 28th of February 1991 to the 31st of December 1992 but what he has already testified to is something that by his own admission occurred in 1990.  He has not made application in respect of that incident, therefore there is no application for that incident before us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="73">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>You see, if he&#039;d only mentioned the name for instance of the victim, then we could say well there&#039;s something to link it to that 1990 incident and the date may be a mistake.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="74">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But there&#039;s nothing.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="75">
			<speaker>MR MAKANJEE</speaker>
			<text>I agree with the Panel, that it is a very generally worded application ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="76">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>...(inaudible)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="77">
			<speaker>MR MAKANJEE</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s very true.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="78">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Makanjee, I think it is obvious to all of us what should happen.  I appreciate your difficulty.  I am going to adjourn for five minutes.  You can explain the position to your client and hopefully you&#039;ll be able to explain it properly, that he understands and that sanity prevails.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="79">
			<speaker>MR MAKANJEE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="80">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="81">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>ON RESUMPTION</text>
		</line>
		<line number="82">
			<speaker>PERRY NHLANHLA DLAMINI</speaker>
			<text>(s.u.o.)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="83">
			<speaker>MR MAKANJEE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairperson.  Mr Chairperson, after taking instructions from my client, my instructions are that my client is adamant that it was a mistake on the form and he does wish to proceed with his application.  The findings can only be left in the hands of the Panel.  Thank you, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="84">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Any other questions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="85">
			<speaker>MR MAKANJEE</speaker>
			<text>No more questions, thank you, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="86">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR MAKANJEE</text>
		</line>
		<line number="87">
			<speaker>MR SWANEPOEL</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="88">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Just briefly, Sir, whose idea was it to go and bomb this house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="89">
			<speaker>MR DLAMINI</speaker>
			<text>The idea was from Sally(?) but the commander was comrade Themba and Bafana and Jacky and myself ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="90">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Just repeat that name please.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="91">
			<speaker>MR DLAMINI</speaker>
			<text>The idea was from all of us but the commander was comrade Themba.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="92">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Now just repeat the names that you mentioned about a minute ago.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="93">
			<speaker>MR DLAMINI</speaker>
			<text>Themba Xaba, Bafana Baloi, Jacky Macheo and myself.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="94">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Is that all?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="95">
			<speaker>MR DLAMINI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that&#039;s all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="96">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s not all the names you mentioned.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="97">
			<speaker>MR DLAMINI</speaker>
			<text>Sally was the one who was responsible for us to fill the amnesty application forms.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="98">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But you were asked whose idea it was and you mentioned a name similar to Sally, was that a mistake?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="99">
			<speaker>MR DLAMINI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it was a mistake, I didn&#039;t understand the question very well.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="100">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I find that strange because all the other names you mentioned you repeated, but anyway you say it was a mistake.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="101">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Yes, Mr Swanepoel?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="102">
			<speaker>MR SWANEPOEL</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="103">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	And when did you first decide to attack this house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="104">
			<speaker>MR DLAMINI</speaker>
			<text>We first decided as an organisation.  As members of the ANC we decided that it was important for us to attack houses which belonged to people who were like Mr Msizi because they were harassing people and some people even lost their houses because of them.  Therefore we decided that if we can burn his house, he will be forced to resign as a councillor.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="105">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>The question was only this, when did you decide?  Now you&#039;ve given us a long answer with reasons and you didn&#039;t listen to the question, you only recited your own answer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="106">
			<speaker>MR DLAMINI</speaker>
			<text>We decided on the very same day.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="107">
			<speaker>MR SWANEPOEL</speaker>
			<text>About what time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="108">
			<speaker>MR DLAMINI</speaker>
			<text>It was about 7 o&#039;clock.  We started preparing the petrol bombs and then we waited for a while and then at 9 o&#039;clock we started attacking Mr Msizi&#039;s house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="109">
			<speaker>MR SWANEPOEL</speaker>
			<text>Did you see what damage was done to the house after the attack?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="110">
			<speaker>MR DLAMINI</speaker>
			<text>I didn&#039;t see that, or the damage the same day.  The next day we came and we realised that the windows were broken and the roof but the walls were still ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="111">
			<speaker>MR SWANEPOEL</speaker>
			<text>I have nothing further, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="112">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR SWANEPOEL</text>
		</line>
		<line number="113">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Ms Patel?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="114">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>No thank you, Honourable Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="115">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MS PATEL</text>
		</line>
		<line number="116">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Any re-examination, Mr Chairperson, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="117">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO RE-EXAMINATION BY MR MAKANJEE</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>