<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY HEARINGS</type>
	<startdate>1999-02-03</startdate>
	<location>NELSPRUIT</location>
	<day>3</day>
	<names>SOLOMON COLLEN MTAMBO</names>
	<case>AM8018/97</case>
						<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=53154&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/1999/99020105_nel_990203ne.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="1096">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>ON RESUMPTION</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Claassen?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Madam Chair?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>We may proceed with the application of Mr Solomon Collen Mtambo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>I thank you Madam Chair, he wishes to take the oath.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mtambo, will you please rise?  Are you going to take an oath?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>SOLOMON COLLEN MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You may sit down, you have been sworn in.  You may take over Mr Claassen.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Madam Chair.  Thank you Madam Chair.  Mr Mtambo, you are today an applicant before this Amnesty Committee concerning a crime which were committed on the 2nd of April 1994, the killing of Mshenga Phumayo, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Sorry Mr Claassen, was the date not the 29th of May 1993?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Pardon me, that is indeed correct, that was the date of his conviction.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>And Mr Mtambo, you were sentenced on the 2nd of April 1994 to a twelve year prison sentence, for this particular crime, which you are currently serving?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct, but I was sentenced on the 13th of June 1995.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Pardon me, Madam Chair, let the record state then the date of sentence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Mtambo, could you very briefly just explain to the Court the circumstances immediately surrounding the commission of this offence, what happened the day when you killed Mr Phumayo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I can.   I was a Vice-Chairman of IFP youth at Dela in Davel.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	We used to hold meetings at a creche as the youth of Inkatha.  At Dela there were conflicts between the ANC and the IFP, and a decision was taken that some of us were not supposed to use certain streets, and some of us were not supposed to use other streets.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Other members of the IFP were chased away if they were found in a certain street, which they were not supposed to use.  There were fights between IFP and ANC.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I stayed there or we held a meeting at the creche with the youth, because I was their leader.  I took a decision, even though I didn&#039;t tell them about my decision, and my decision was solely based on how were we going to attack this problem or tackle this problem which we had.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I took a decision to attack someone who was involved, his name is Phumayo.  I realised that if I shoot Mr Phumayo, it was going to enhance our organisation, because some members of the opposite organisation, which was ANC, were going to be scared and join the IFP.  Therefore I attacked him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I was scared after I killed him.  I didn&#039;t like what I did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mtambo, could you just please tell us the day that you killed him, what exactly happened there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>On the day when I killed Mr Phumayo, I was at Maria Mthetwa&#039;s place.  I think it was approximately twenty past eight, to half past eight.  I saw him, he had a navy jacket and a powder blue trousers.  I saw him through a window.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Duduza had already informed me that I should watch because he heard from the rumour that I was going to be attacked.  Since I had this information and also it was my plan that if I attacked Mr Phumayo, it was going to help us.  I saw him as I was sitting at Maria&#039;s place, and when he was next to an electric box, that is when I approached him and I greeted him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	What I saw from his face, he got scared when I was near him and I took out my gun and I shot him.  That is what happened on that day.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mtambo, could you just clarify, you just now mentioned that you were inside Maria&#039;s house and you saw him next to an electric box.  Can you just tell us how this came to be, what happened from Maria&#039;s house, or was this in Maria&#039;s house, what happened there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I was with Fanosi July Nkosi, July Mthetwa and Stella Nonqlandla.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Won&#039;t you just give these names slowly, we are taking down your evidence and try and give your evidence at a pace at which the Translators will be able to translate everything you say.  Just be a little slower as you give your evidence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You may repeat the people you with at Maria&#039;s house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>July Mthetwa, Fanosi Nkosi, Nonqlandla Mthetwa, July&#039;s brother-in-law and July&#039;s sister, Mercy and Maria Mthetwa, the owner of the house.  I can&#039;t remember others who were there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Are these people members of your organisation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Were they present there at for any particular reason?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>No, there was no particular reason, we were just sitting there inside the house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Most of the time, I used to visit Maria&#039;s place.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Was this an IFP stronghold?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Many people who were members of IFP, used to visit Maria&#039;s place.  They used to just visit the place.  Most of the people who used to visit Maria&#039;s place, were IFP members, because even Maria herself, was an IFP member.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Do you recall that during your criminal trial, this place was described as a shibeen?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Was it not a shibeen?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>It was.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Was it not frequented by people in Davel?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>It was, some people, the people that were from local and these people never used to give us the problem.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And it was frequented by people irrespective of any political affiliation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Can I just clarify one thing, just before you go on Mr Claassen, sorry to do so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Who told you this person said, he told you that he had heard that you were going to be attacked and you must watch out?  I just didn&#039;t catch the name when you were testifying?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Who was it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Duduza Qaba.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Don&#039;t explain or clarify anything, just answer the question.  He just asked you a question and that is fine, we&#039;ve got the answer now.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Madam Chair.  Mr Mtambo, not who you were in the house with, you said that you saw the deceased at an electrical box.  Can you just very briefly, what happened from the house to the point where you shot him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>We were just sitting there and we were drinking and liquor was full on the table, on the 29th.  Because I have already made a decision as to gain IFP members, because we were the minority in that place, I didn&#039;t tell anyone about my decision because I realised that the people who were there, who were present at that house ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>May I interrupt Mr Claassen, we will also expect you to take charge of your client&#039;s evidence in chief please.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>I will do so Madam Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Please interrupt him if during his evidence, you can hear that it is not being translated the way you want it.  He is not responding to the question, to your question, because now he is giving evidence on an aspect that you have not put a question to, he is not responding to your question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="61">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Madam Chair, I will do so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="62">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>May I then just address your client?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="63">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Madam Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="64">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mtambo, we would request you to please confine your responses to questions being posed by your legal representative, and only confine your responses to those questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="65">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	The question which was put to you was to explain what happened from the time you recognised that Mr Phumayo was outside the electric box, what did you do because you explained that you went out, you got to him next to the electric box, you greeted him and then you shot him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="66">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Your Attorney wants you to explain in detail every step what you did, from the time that you left the house up to the time you greeted him and then shot him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="67">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>When I left the house, I turned behind the house, I took the gun from the bag.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="68">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What do you mean when you say you turned the house, maybe that has not been properly translated?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="69">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	If you can just please repeat what you have just said.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="70">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>When I left the house, or when I came out from the house, I went behind the house, I took the gun from the bag and I cocked it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="71">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Now what do you mean by saying that you took the gun from the - is it back or from a bag?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="72">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>My apology there, the gun was in my pocket, in my trousers pocket, in my trousers pocket.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="73">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, you may proceed Mr Mtambo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="74">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I took the magazine, I put it in my left pocket.  I only had one bullet in that gun.  It was loaded inside the gun.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="75">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I left Maria&#039;s house, I went straight to the deceased, Mr Mshenga.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="76">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did I understand you to be saying you left Maria&#039;s house for the deceased&#039;s house, Mshenga, was that properly translated?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="77">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I went to Mshenga straight, not in his house, he was on the street, not in his house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="78">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	When I arrived there, I greeted him.  He answered back and I asked him why he was there.  He said he was there, looking for his girlfriend.  I didn&#039;t trust what he said because I have already heard something.  That is when I took out the gun from my pocket.  He was facing downwards, and I shot him from the back and then I ran away.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="79">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Why didn&#039;t you believe him when he said he was there for his girlfriend?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="80">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>He never used to frequent that street, and I didn&#039;t know that he had a girlfriend on that street.  This is why I didn&#039;t believe him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="81">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I didn&#039;t know whether he was telling the truth as to his being there because he wanted to see his girlfriend, or if he was there because of what I have already heard.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="82">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	When I shot him, I ran away.  I ran away, I passed Maria&#039;s house and I jumped the fence.   I got inside the yard, I opened the window, I got inside through the window.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="83">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Can I just get clarity on this please Mr Mtambo.  The street you shot him in, is this the same street Maria&#039;s house is in?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="84">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is the same street.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="85">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>You explained to us earlier on that there were streets that were to be used by IFP members and streets to be used by the ANC members.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="86">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Was this an ANC or IFP street?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="87">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I will say it was an IFP street.  IFP members used to use that street frequent, more than the ANC.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="88">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>And then the members who visited Maria&#039;s house, who were not IFP members, which street did they use?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="89">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>The people who used to frequent Maria&#039;s place, they were neighbours, who were drinking and we used to take them as alcoholics.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="90">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	These are the people who used to frequent Maria&#039;s house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="91">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Who were not IFP members, I just want clarity on that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="92">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Most of them were IFP members who used to visit Maria&#039;s place, but those who were not affiliated with IFP, they were just alcoholics and neighbours.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="93">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I can give an example and say ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="94">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>It is not necessary.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="95">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Madam Chair.  Mr Mtambo, you have just testified that you had heard something from this person Duduza and that made you mistrust the deceased.  Who is Duduza and what did he tell you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="96">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Duduza, what Duduza told me made me  mistrust or distrust  Phumayo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="97">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The question was who is Duduza and what did he tell you, there are two questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="98">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Who is Duduza Qaba and the second question is, what did he Duduza Qaba tell you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="99">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Duduza Qaba, it is a member of the ANC, he was a member of the ANC and it is a female, I grew up with her.  We got along very well, and she got along well with Sophy, Ndono.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="100">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	They were friends with Sophy, Ndono.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="101">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Who is Sophy, Ndono?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="102">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Her name is Ndono, her mother is Sophy.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="103">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Who are they?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="104">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Sophy is my aunt and Ndono is my cousin.  Ndono is my niece.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="105">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mtambo, and what did this Duduza tell you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="106">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>He greeted me and he told me to be careful and when I asked him as to why should I be careful, he said I know about those people who were referred to as comrades, but he didn&#039;t give me the name of the person who was going to give me a problem, which he has already perceived.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="107">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, you are being very vague.  Please explain this, you are talking around.  Did she say that you know these people or maybe there is a problem with the translation, I am not sure.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="108">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>He said I know the comrades, he said and I know the fact that we don&#039;t get along with the comrades and the enmity between the IFP and the ANC.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="109">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I knew that he was there most of the time, in the township.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="110">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I think there was something wrong that probably you didn&#039;t say, you omitted to say or probably was omitted in the translation.  You seem to have mentioned somebody&#039;s name, but it was not translated.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="111">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Can you repeat what you have just said so that we can get our notes corrected.  There is something missing in my note and I see there is also a nod from one of the Committee members, that he is also missing something.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="112">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t remember mentioning someone&#039;s name, I mentioned only Duduza.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="113">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Perhaps I can help here, what we are trying to understand is what exactly did she tell you?  Did she say to you I know these people, that she knows them, or did she say to you, be careful, you know these people, they are your enemies and make an implication that there was something you had to be careful about?  It is just not coming out clearly in the way either you are saying it, or it is being translated, so I want you just to try and give us the sense.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="114">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Did she say she had heard something that you should worry about, or did she say you know these people, I have a feeling something might happen, etc?  That is what we are trying to understand.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="115">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>He said to me, Stumu, you must be careful today.  That is what he said.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="116">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>He said be careful today?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="117">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="118">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And then he used a certain name, which included comrades, what did he say about comrades?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="119">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I asked him why should I be careful, and he said you know that there is enmity between you and the comrades.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="120">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did you try to ask him as to who exactly among the comrades you should be careful of or from?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="121">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	In your knowledge, the number of the comrades in Davel, were they a majority?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="122">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, they were.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="123">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And in other words, he was warning you to be careful from all the comrades?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="124">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="125">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mtambo, did this Duduza mention the name of Mr Phumayo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="126">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>No, I can&#039;t remember whether he mentioned his name, but if I recall very well, I don&#039;t remember him mentioning his name.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="127">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You just said that she did not identify any person in particular.  That is the note I have here?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="128">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Did she or did she not, or can&#039;t you remember?  These are two different things.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="129">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>No, she didn&#039;t tell me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="130">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Just stick to the evidence you have already testified to.  You don&#039;t have to say you don&#039;t remember if you know that he didn&#039;t identify any person.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="131">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	You get a contradiction in the two things you are saying.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="132">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>My apology there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="133">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="134">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Madam Chair.  Mr Mtambo, just to get back, you started your evidence by saying that you were a member of the IFP.  At that stage, how long had you been a member, and what was your rank inside the IFP?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="135">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>At first I was a Vice-Chairman of the IFP.  Mkhize left and then I was the Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="136">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Is it of the IFP or of the IFP Youth Brigade?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="137">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Of the IFP Youth Brigade.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="138">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I just needed that clarification Mr Claassen, because this evidence has already been given by mr Mtambo, right in the beginning.  You don&#039;t need to traverse it again.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="139">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Madam Chair.  Mr Mtambo, can you just state how long had you been a member of the IFP?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="140">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>When I first joined the IFP, was in 1992 up until now.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="141">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>May I interpose Mr Claassen, whilst we are on this point, and for how long had you been the Vice-Chairperson of the Youth Brigade?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="142">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>A year.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="143">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>When were you first appointed as the Chair of the IFP Youth Brigade?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="144">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>In 1993.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="145">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Can you approximate the month when you became such a Chair?  The incident occurred in May 1993, can you from there be able to estimate how long you had been in your position as the Chair of that organisation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="146">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>In January.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="147">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Thank you Mr Claassen.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="148">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Madam Chair.  Mr Mtambo, you also at the beginning briefly stated that  a meeting had been held in kwaDela where a certain decision was taken.  What was the nature of this meeting?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="149">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Do you mean the meeting which was held at the creche, are you referring to that meeting?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="150">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Madam Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="151">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Won&#039;t you just make that clear to him, it will facilitate his response I think.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="152">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mtambo, with specific reference to the meeting, you said the meetings were held at a creche, that meeting at the creche.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="153">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>We used to hold meetings and we were encouraging the youth of IFP and we were encouraging each other as to recruit other youth members, and the collection of money to help other members ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="154">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Come to our rescue Mr Claassen and please try and take charge.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="155">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Certainly Madam Chair.  Mr Mtambo, was this specific meeting, an IFP meeting?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="156">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it was.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="157">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Do you remember or recollect who was present at this particular meeting?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="158">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I do remember.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="159">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Can you just briefly state who these people were?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="160">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I will mention some names, even though I cannot remember everyone who was present.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="161">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mtambo, I think we will leave it at that.  Can you approximate how many people were present at this particular meeting?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="162">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>There were about 15.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="163">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>And were these people all IFP members?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="164">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, they were.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="165">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mtambo, you mentioned that a decision was taken, what was this decision?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="166">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Didn&#039;t he say he took a decision?  That is his evidence, are you not trying to change his evidence Mr Claassen?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="167">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>My pardon Madam Chair, it is indeed that he said the decision was taken by him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="168">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="169">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>May I just rephrase it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="170">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Maybe you can just clear that with him, but he has already testified to him taking a decision, not to people who were at that meeting taking a decision.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="171">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Maybe you need to get clarity on that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="172">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>As the Court pleases.  If I may approach him just for a second.  Thank you Madam Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="173">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Thank you Madam Chair, it is indeed correct as stated, the decision was taken by him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="174">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Mtambo, could you just briefly explain the decision and why it was taken?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="175">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Because of the harassment or torture, I was injured before I took this decision.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="176">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>How were you injured?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="177">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I was walking one day, and I was beaten up and I opened a case, but then it was never followed up.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="178">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	After I got injured, my teeth were loosened.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="179">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mtambo, do you know who these people were that beat you up?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="180">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I do remember them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="181">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Were they IFP members, were they ANC members?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="182">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>They were ANC members.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="183">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mtambo, did you know the deceased?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="184">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I knew him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="185">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>How did you know him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="186">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>He was a member of an ANC organisation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="187">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>How do you know this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="188">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I used to see him when they were toyi-toying, he was right in front.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="189">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Do you know if the deceased held any specific position within the ANC?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="190">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="191">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>What position is this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="192">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>He was a Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="193">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>If you say a Chairman,  a Chairman of the local branch or what kind of a Chairman?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="194">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>He was a Chairman of the Youth Brigade.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="195">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>This was in kwaDela?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="196">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="197">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mtambo, why did you decide to kill Mr Phumayo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="198">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>He was a brave man.  He used to attack IFP members and he used to make sure that he injured them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="199">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mtambo, what were the circumstances like in kwaDela prior to this incident?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="200">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>There were conflicts and people were fighting.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="201">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Were these conflicts of a political nature?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="202">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it was between ANC and IFP.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="203">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mtambo, you said you made this decision.  In what capacity did you decide this, as Chairman of the IFP Youth Brigade?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="204">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I took this decision as a Chairman of the IFP Youth Brigade.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="205">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mtambo, once you had committed this act, was there any gain for you personally for doing this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="206">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="207">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>What did you hope to gain politically?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="208">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>My aim was to gain more members because I knew that other people were going to be scared and they were going to join the IFP.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="209">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Come again, I didn&#039;t get that.  You killed him because you thought other people would be scared and would join the IFP?  By other people, do you mean the ANC people will then be intimidated and leave the organisation and join your organisation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="210">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I mean ANC.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="211">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="212">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Madam Chair.  Mr Mtambo, Madam Chair, if I may, I would just like to draw your attention to the applications which you brought before this Commission.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="213">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	If I may Madam Chair, it is page 2 and 7 respectively.  Mr Mtambo, it is pointed out to you that you brought two or submitted two Form 1&#039;s, applications, which are included in your application form today, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="214">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="215">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Madam Chair, if I may refer to page 3, paragraph (b) just under number 4, the question Mr Mtambo was put to you state whether any person was injured, killed or suffered any damage to property as a result of such acts or omissions or offences.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="216">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	You had written down deceased Mshenga Phumayo and six houses were set on fire, would you care to explain that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="217">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  After I shot Mr Phumayo, houses were burnt.  It was after this incident.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="218">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mtambo, could you just clarify, you are talking about houses, who burnt down these houses?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="219">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>ANC burnt the houses.  Now I cannot say who exactly, because I was hiding at the time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="220">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Can we get clarity on when these houses were burnt?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="221">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>On the 29th of May, on the same day when I killed Mr Phumayo.  After I killed him, then the houses were burnt down.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="222">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What time did you kill Mr Phumayo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="223">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I can say it was half past eight or approximately, or between half past eight to nine o&#039;clock.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="224">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>At night?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="225">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, at night.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="226">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And what time were these houses burnt down?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="227">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>It was after a while.  If I can just estimate, I will just say between ten and eleven o&#039;clock, I don&#039;t have the exact time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="228">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And to whom did they belong?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="229">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Members of the IFP.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="230">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Were these high ranking members of the IFP?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="231">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>No, they were just ordinary people who were known to be members of the IFP.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="232">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Was your house burnt down?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="233">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>No, it wasn&#039;t.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="234">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Claassen, you may proceed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="235">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Madam Chair.  Mr Mtambo, I also wish to draw your attention to page 18 of the application bundle.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="236">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Mtambo, it is a statement by yourself, a confession statement which was taken on the 5th of June 1993 and in this statement, several things are said which does not coerce with anything you have told this Commission so far today.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="237">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Can you briefly tell the Commission what the circumstances surrounding when you made this affidavit, why you said the things that you did?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="238">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I would like to ask as to which statement are you referring to, you are talking about my application or my statement?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="239">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>If I may Madam Chair, the confession statement taken at the Davel police station.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="240">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I can explain.  I made a statement in the police, and I didn&#039;t tell the truth, it was a lie.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="241">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I was trying to escape from being sentenced for what I had done.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="242">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mtambo, can you just tell the Commission what do you, how do you feel today about these offences?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="243">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I am not relieved at all.  I am not at rest for what I have done.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="244">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I am deeply sorry, more especially when we mention the deceased&#039;s name.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="245">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Madam Chair, I have no further questions for the applicant.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="246">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR CLAASSEN</text>
		</line>
		<line number="247">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Ms Thabete, do you have any questions to put to Mr Mtambo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="248">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>Yes Madam Chair, I do but before I proceed, I would like to put it on record, that I have met with the victims and I will be representing them as well.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="249">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>We shall note so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="250">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mtambo, you have testified that there was a lot of political conflict at your area.  During what period was this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="251">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>From when I joined the IFP, it was always like that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="252">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>From which year, 1990?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="253">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>It was 1992.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="254">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>In 1993, isn&#039;t it correct that at that time, the conflict had died down, even though there was still enmity between IFP and ANC?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="255">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>No, it is not correct.  The truth is there was enmity and there were conflicts.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="256">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>Well Mr Mtambo, according to my instructions, by the time, by 1993, there wasn&#039;t political conflict between IFP and ANC, even though before, there was.  What do you have to say about that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="257">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t understand your question Ms Thabete.  Are you saying that there was no enmity between the ANC and the IFP and that there was no conflict?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="258">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>There was enmity between IFP and ANC, but by 1993, the fighting had stopped?   What is your comment on that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="259">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I deny that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="260">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  What were the relations between you and Mr Phumayo, the deceased?  Did you talk to each other, or did you just know him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="261">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I used to talk to him, in fact I have spoken to him about the violence at Davel.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="262">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Won&#039;t you just be specific Mr Mtambo bearing in mind that we have read all the papers that you have used in support of your application.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="263">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Isn&#039;t it true that you in your application stated that you grew together with the deceased, played together and that you were friends, although you had different political ideas in that you belonged to different political organisations?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="264">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>We actually grew together, at the time he wasn&#039;t a participant in political organisations.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="265">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So you knew him quite well?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="266">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="267">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>That is the question that Ms Thabete was trying to elicit from you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="268">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>My apology there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="269">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>When Duduza Qaba told you that you will be attacked, you have testified that he didn&#039;t mention any names, isn&#039;t that so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="270">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="271">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>When did she actually tell you that your life was under threat?   Maybe to help you, in relation to the death of Mr Phumayo, when did she tell you this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="272">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>He told me before I killed Mr Phumayo.  What Duduza told me, when he told me, Phumayo was still alive.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="273">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>Was it two days before you killed him, was it a week before you killed him, was it a month before you killed him when you were told this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="274">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>On the same day when I killed, on the 29th.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="275">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>So when you say in your application at number 9 A4, page 8, that you had received earlier on a tip to the effect that the deceased made a vow that if you could be eliminated, their organisation in their region, will have peace of mind, that is not correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="276">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.  But this is what he said, him, the deceased, not Duduza.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="277">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	This is what he told me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="278">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>Who told you that the deceased had said this then?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="279">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>That is the deceased himself.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="280">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is what his evidence is.  His evidence now is that the deceased told him that himself.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="281">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	When did he tell you this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="282">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I met him as I was leaving Mthetwa&#039;s house.  I don&#039;t remember the day, but this was before I took a decision that I was going to kill him.  He was the one who told me first that if I were to be killed, ANC will gain more members.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="283">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Can you explain what you were doing at Maria Mthetwa&#039;s shibeen that day when the deceased was killed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="284">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I was just sitting there and this is the place I used to frequent.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="285">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>Were you drinking that day?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="286">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>No, I wasn&#039;t.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="287">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>So what were you doing there at the shibeen, just briefly, if you were not drinking?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="288">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I was just sitting there with the people who were drinking.  Most of the time, this is the place I used to sit.  I used to frequent Maria&#039;s place, sometimes Saturday morning, I used to spend my time relaxing at her place.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="289">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	When you are there, you can actually see the school.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="290">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>No, it is fine, I don&#039;t need to know to reason why you were there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="291">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Do you drink at all generally?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="292">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I do.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="293">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>Okay, when you arrived at Maria Mthetwa&#039;s shibeen that day, did you have a gun with you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="294">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="295">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>Was it your gun?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="296">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="297">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>Why did you have a gun with you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="298">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>To protect myself because the situation was bad.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="299">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>You say you saw or maybe I should ask you, when you saw the deceased, where were you, were you still at Maria&#039;s shibeen?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="300">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I was inside her house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="301">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>It wouldn&#039;t be true, because according to your application, let me just look for the page number, page 28, you say you were on your way home when you saw Mr Phumayo, so that means it is not true that you were actually at Maria&#039;s.  Which version is the true, were you at Maria&#039;s place or were you on your way home when you actually saw Mr Phumayo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="302">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>If I can explain there, when I left Maria&#039;s house, I was going home.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="303">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>So what are you saying, were you on your way home, or were you still at Maria&#039;s place when you saw it, that is what I am trying to find out?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="304">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Can I explain what Ms Thabete is trying to find out from you, at page 30 I have got a typed record, whose handwriting is this Mr Mtambo, is this your handwriting?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="305">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>No, it is not my handwriting.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="306">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Who wrote the statement for you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="307">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Alson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="308">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Who is Alson?  Who is he?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="309">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>He came to visit me in prison.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="310">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Is he a friend?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="311">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>No, he said he was sent there by the TRC to take the statement.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="312">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>He is the Investigator from the TRC.  Now what is contained here is that, paragraph 3, is that you only noticed Mr Phumayo as you were on your way home.  You only noticed him once you were out of Maria&#039;s house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="313">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	During your viva voce evidence, you stated that you noticed him whilst you were inside the house, and you saw him standing next to an electric box.  That is not what is in your statement.  All that she wants you to explain is that difference.  Do you understand?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="314">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I understand.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="315">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="316">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>If I may explain, there are two streets.  I was sitting in Maria&#039;s house and peeping through the window, I was right inside the house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="317">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	He was coming, because it was bright, because of the street lamps.  I saw him as he was coming.  Before he arrived at the electric box, that is when I came out from Maria&#039;s house and I said I am leaving for home because I didn&#039;t know exactly who was going to attack me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="318">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t think you are answering her question.  She wants to know why in your statement you said you only noticed him as you were on your way home, whereas in your oral evidence, you say you saw him whilst you were inside the house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="319">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I am trying to explain the difference.  I saw him for the first time while I was still inside the house, and when I was outside, I could see him as well.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="320">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>We know that.  Are you saying therefore that what is contained in your statement, is incorrect?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="321">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I will say it is a lie.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="322">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did you legal representative read this statement to you before the commencement of this hearing?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="323">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="324">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And did you notice that according to what is contained herein, the point at which you first saw Mr Mshenga was when you were on your way home and not when you were inside Maria&#039;s house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="325">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>No, I didn&#039;t notice that.  As I am explaining that there is a street right above Maria&#039;s house, and I thought this two were not conflicting each other that much.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="326">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did you notice that your statement contained something that you did not agree with, that is my question, in relation to at what stage you saw Mshenga on the day in question?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="327">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>No, I didn&#039;t notice that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="328">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You may proceed Ms Thabete.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="329">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Madam Chair.  Did you know where Mr Phumayo lived, his home?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="330">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="331">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>How far was it from Maria&#039;s place?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="332">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>It was far, much too far.  I think if I may count the streets, it is approximately five streets from Maria&#039;s place to his house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="333">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>My instructions are that when you actually saw Mr Phumayo, he was from his home.  What is your comment on that and he was very much close from his house or his home?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="334">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>No, that is not true.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="335">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Are your instructions that Mr Phumayo&#039;s house was not five streets away from Maria&#039;s house?  Are those your instructions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="336">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>I will have to clarify that Madam Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="337">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="338">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mtambo, you say when you followed the deceased, you actually caught up with him, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="339">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="340">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>And you say you had a conversation with him, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="341">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="342">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>Exactly what was the conversation, can you briefly tell us?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="343">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I greeted him and he greeted me back.  What I have noticed is that he was scared when I came closer to him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="344">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>Why did he show fear because I thought earlier on you said he was a very brave man and you were used to him, why would he fear you all of a sudden?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="345">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>What I can say is that we were scared of each other, we were scared of meeting each other at night.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="346">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	That is why he was scared, because we never used to come closer to each other at night.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="347">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>No, that is not my question.  My question is earlier on you testified to the fact that you were on good relations, you used to talk to each other and on this particular day, you just greeted him, and he had fear.  Why?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="348">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Because according to your evidence, he was a very brave man, he was used to you, why on this particular day, did he fear you, that is my question.  If you don&#039;t know, you can say you don&#039;t know.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="349">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t know why he was scared.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="350">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>And then, what was the conversation, what did he say to you, what did you say to him, if at all you did say anything to each other before you actually shot him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="351">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>He said we can walk along, and I asked him as to how can we walk along together, because he was an ANC member and I was an IFP member.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="352">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	There was no harmony between the two of us.  The reason I said so was because I didn&#039;t want other IFP members to think that I was betraying them, because they were going to think that I was betraying them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="353">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>Is that all?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="354">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="355">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>Is that all you said to him, and what he said to you and then you shot him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="356">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I can&#039;t remember what he said, other things he said.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="357">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>Can you tell us how you shot him?  What led to you shooting him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="358">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, if I can interrupt.  He hasn&#039;t answered your question, which you put to him, and you are just proceeding on.  You asked him is that all he said to you, not what you may have spoken about?  Your answer was, I can&#039;t remember everything I said to him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="359">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Did he say anything more to you besides let&#039;s go for a walk together?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="360">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I can&#039;t remember.  I can&#039;t remember if he added on that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="361">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Maybe it is because when I arrived there, I actually saw a chance that I should use that chance, to kill him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="362">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mtambo, are you saying from the time you left Maria Mthetwa&#039;s place and saw the deceased, you had actually decided that you were going to shoot at him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="363">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>The decision which I have already taken, wasn&#039;t specific to kill him, but the decision which I had taken was that I was going to kill anyone who belonged to ANC members.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="364">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You must be careful Mr Mtambo, you must be careful about your testimony and the contradictions that might arise as a result of what you are saying now.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="365">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	That is not what you initially said.  In your evidence in chief, you stated categorically that you yourself, took a decision to kill Phumayo, not any other member of the ANC.  It was a decision to kill a specific person and that person was Phumayo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="366">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Now you are giving evidence under oath and the requirements of you succeeding in getting amnesty is that you must be honest.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="367">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	You recall giving evidence and saying that you yourself took a decision to kill Phumayo, in order to enhance the integrity of your organisation, because he was a brave man and that killing him, would intimidate the ANC members, who would then be intimidated and join your organisation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="368">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I am just worried about your evidence now which seems to suggest that when you took a decision, you didn&#039;t have any person in mind, to kill.  The decision was intended to kill any member, any member of the ANC, and not a specific person.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="369">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>That is true, I did say that I took a decision to kill Mr Phumayo, because I have already said that my reasons were that he was a brave man.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="370">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I would like to apologise.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="371">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Ms Thabete, may I with your indulgence and Mr Claassen&#039;s indulgence, and all those present, request that we take a two minute adjournment.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="372">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="373">
			<speaker>SOLOMON COLLEN MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>(still under oath)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="374">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>(continued)   Mr Mtambo, you have been asked a question as to why you killed Mr Phumayo, and your response was because he was a brave man and it would intimidate the ANC.  Is there any other reason why you killed him or is that the reason why you killed him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="375">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I would like you to clarify what do you mean when you say, are you saying he was intimidating ANC members or IFP members?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="376">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>Didn&#039;t you say when you were asked why you killed Mr Phumayo, you said the reason was because he was a very brave man and killing him would intimidate the ANC organisation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="377">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I said that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="378">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>Is that the only reason why you killed him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="379">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>There are many reasons, which made me to kill him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="380">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>Can you tell the Committee what those reasons are?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="381">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>There were other members under my command, they used to come to me with complaints saying that they have been chased with pangas and they are not able to use the streets, and he himself, Mr Phumayo was the one who was involved in these incidents.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="382">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	These are some of the reasons why I attacked him, because I realised he is harassing the people.  I will say these are the reasons why I killed him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="383">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>How old would you say the deceased was when you killed him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="384">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>You mean, I can&#039;t know.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="385">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>An estimation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="386">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I will say he was even older compared to myself, but I won&#039;t be able to know how old.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="387">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>Okay, he was 25 years old.  So are you saying a 25 year old was intimidating people around the township, is that your evidence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="388">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="389">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Is there something wrong with a 25 year old intimidating people?  Isn&#039;t that a probability you should accept, Ms Thabete?  Do you want to proceed with that point?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="390">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, but I thought I would say that on argument, the fact that he was so young.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="391">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  You then can do so, but you will do so knowing that this panel is quite alive and sensitive to the fact that during the conflict, young people did intimidate, as young as 14.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="392">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>I am indebted to you Madam Chair.  Would it be incorrect or is it incorrect or is it not true what you have written in your statements on page 11, sorry page 8 actually, sorry.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="393">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Just read it to him, Ms Thabete.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="394">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>I will read it to him just now.  You say I shot dead Mr Mshenga Phumayo on self defence, after he had attempted to shoot me.  This is not correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="395">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct, that is not true.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="396">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>And it is also not correct on page 28 where you say that he had tried to take out his firearm on you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="397">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	You are saying that is not correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="398">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="399">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  You say several attempts were made to kill you.  How, how did they try to kill you, can you briefly explain?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="400">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Sometimes while walking on the way, I will hear some firearms and see people holding firearms, trying to shoot me and therefore I will try to run away, to escape from the danger.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="401">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>Now, my last question to you is, how do you think killing Mr Phumayo because he was a brave man and because you wanted to intimidate the ANC, how is that political?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="402">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Hasn&#039;t he said that?  The ANC members would be intimidated and then they would join the IFP.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="403">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>My mistake Madam Chair.  Thank you, no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="404">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MS THABETE</text>
		</line>
		<line number="405">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, do you have any re-examination Mr Claassen?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="406">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>No re-examination Madam Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="407">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO RE-EXAMINATION BY MR CLAASSEN</text>
		</line>
		<line number="408">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Ms Bosman, do you have any question to put to Mr Mtambo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="409">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Just one question.  Mr Mtambo, this decision that certain members would use some streets, the IFP would use some streets and the ANC would use other streets, was this a joint decision?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="410">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>It wasn&#039;t a joint decision, but it is something that happened, not knowing exactly how it came to be like that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="411">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>... (tape ends) ... the one lot, some streets and the others another street, just the sort of thing that happened in practise?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="412">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>To explain further on that, is that if I were to be found in their streets, I would be hurt, but if they were found in your street, normally they wouldn&#039;t be hurt because we were the minority in the area.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="413">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>That is sufficient, thank you very much.  No further questions, thank you Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="414">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You are a man of many words Mr Mtambo, you must try and just keep to what is being put to you, least you run the danger of even coming with answers which will be to the detriment of your own application.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="415">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Lax, do you have any questions to put to Mr Mtambo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="416">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson.  You said in your evidence in chief, that you were sitting at Maria Mthetwa&#039;s and that you saw the deceased coming, you saw the deceased coming, you said you had information about him, in a sense you were expecting him?  Did I get the right impression?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="417">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="418">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>You said you had made a decision, you got out of the house, you sorted out your firearm behind the house, you went to where he was at that stage, next to the electrical box?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="419">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="420">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>You said that you greeted him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="421">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="422">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>He got scared when you were near him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="423">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="424">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>For some reason he was bending away and you shot him, you took out your gun and you shot him while he was pointing away from you,  that is how it was translated.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="425">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="426">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Now, did he try to run away that he was not facing you and you managed to shoot him in the head or in the back of the neck?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="427">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>He didn&#039;t try to run away.  He didn&#039;t try to do anything because at that split of the moment, I shot him and he fell on the ground.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="428">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I am the one who ran away thereafter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="429">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>What I am trying to understand is, when you talk to somebody, they usually face you, correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="430">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>May you please repeat the last part of your question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="431">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>What I am trying to understand is this, when you talk to somebody, you usually face them, face to face?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="432">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="433">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>How did it come about that he turned around and you were able to shoot him in the back of the neck?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="434">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it happened like that.  I will explain in this way, the clarify on that point, we were standing parallel, facing towards the same direction.   Thereafter myself, I moved back, that was at the stage where I shot him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="435">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>But surely if he was scared of you, he would have been watching you carefully?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="436">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="437">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>So how come he didn&#039;t see you move back and pull the firearm out and then shoot him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="438">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I would also like to explain on that point, I was also afraid of him myself and then I had to do it quickly.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="439">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I didn&#039;t show him that I, I wasn&#039;t supposed to show him that I was going to shoot him, because he might have fought back.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="440">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Just now Ms Thabete was asking you some questions around the issue of you pulling out your firearm or whether you took it out and so on.  I wasn&#039;t clear from the way it was translated, whether you were saying yes, it is a lie or yes, it is true, he tried to pull out his firearm, I couldn&#039;t work it out for my own answer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="441">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Can you just clarify that for me please?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="442">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I said no, he didn&#039;t pull out a firearm, I am the one who pulled out a firearm.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="443">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>And can you explain to us why this appears in your statement, that he pulled out the firearm, but immediately he took it out, I ran fast close to him, and asked him what are you doing here?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="444">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I can also explain on that point.  On that particular statement, I will say to distinguish what I am saying before the Committee is the truth, the statement which you are referring to, I gave it as if I was giving it to police, because I didn&#039;t know the people who came to take this statement from me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="445">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>The man who came to take the statement from you, didn&#039;t he explain to you he was from the Truth Commission?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="446">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>He did explain that his name is Alson and he is from the Truth Commission, but myself consciously, I wasn&#039;t willing to disclose everything, I thought I will come and disclose everything before the Commission.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="447">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>He did tell you that he was coming to ask you some questions, to help the Commission with your application, isn&#039;t that so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="448">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>What he said to me is that he came to me to take the statement, and he asked me whether I admit or deny my first statement that I made before.  If I did, if I do deny it, he said I should explain why and I said I don&#039;t have a problem with my previous statement.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="449">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Why did he tell you it was necessary to take this statement down then?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="450">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I didn&#039;t trust that that would help, because I believed that the ANC was using some tricks within the IFP, so I didn&#039;t trust anyone.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="451">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>So, why didn&#039;t you just tell him what you told the police in your criminal case then?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="452">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>It didn&#039;t come into my mind, that I should tell him that, because I tried to give him what I know and I thought I would get a chance to exactly tell what I know.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="453">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>In your evidence, you said that when you came out of the house, he was already at the electrical box, is that right?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="454">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="455">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>However, under cross-examination, you said you caught up to him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="456">
			<speaker>INTERPRETER</speaker>
			<text>Excuse me, repeat the last part, caught up with him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="457">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>You caught up with him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="458">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I will explain that this occurred, the incident occurred next to the electric box.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="459">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>So was he just walking passed the electrical box, and you caught up with him at that point?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="460">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="461">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Well then, why did you say in your evidence in chief, that he was waiting at the electrical box?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="462">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I will say as I was following him, he was in front of me and he was just next to it, he was about to reach it while I was following him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="463">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="464">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I think my note, without interfering with my colleague, states that when you first noticed him, he was next to the electrical box.   That is the note I have.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="465">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  The question is this though, your evidence just was that he was waiting at the electrical box and you still said that he explained he was waiting there for his girlfriend?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="466">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I would say it is like that, even if it seems to be contradicting.  I think the Chairperson is saying that the deceased was walking and I was following him, it is correct that I was following him, but I caught up with him next to the electric box, and that is where I killed him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="467">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Now, the witnesses in the trial, who testified at your trial against you for the State, basically said that the deceased was walking down the road and that you came up behind him without talking to him, or anything, you simply pulled this firearm out from behind you, they said from under your clothes, that is how they described it, and that you shot him in the back of the neck and ran away.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="468">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>That was not true.  As I have explained before to the Commission what exactly  happened, I said my firearm was on my right hand pocket, I pulled it out and I was holding it with my hand at the time.  The way I was holding it, I was ready to shoot at any moment.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="469">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	At night I didn&#039;t trust anything or anyone.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="470">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>So, Sipho Maseko is talking, he is lying when he says what I have just explained to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="471">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I will say he is not telling a lie when I shot him from behind, because I shot him from behind.  I shot him from behind, because as I explained before, I was parallel with him and then I moved back and therefore I was behind him when I shot at him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="472">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>He says you walked behind him, you walked up behind him, as you were walking, you took the firearm from amongst your clothes, from out of your clothes is how he describes it.  I will read it to you just for the record, from page 22 of the bundle, line 6 - he saw the accused pull out a handgun from under his clothing, shoot the deceased in the back of the neck.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="473">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	You say that that is not true, and that you had the firearm in your hand the whole time, from the time that you left Maria&#039;s house until the time that you shot the deceased, that is what you have just told us because you didn&#039;t trust anything at night time, you said?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="474">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I would like to explain on that point.   I explained that the firearm was in my pocket and I was holding it with my hand while it is inside my pocket.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="475">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	It is not the way you put it, while it was in my pocket, I was holding it with my right hand, ready to shoot at any moment.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="476">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>So then Maseko isn&#039;t lying when he says you took it out of your clothing?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="477">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="478">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>How could you, you described that you were standing parallel to each other, were you walking along while you were doing that or were you stationary?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="479">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>We stopped and we talked a bit as we explained.  We did converse and we talked with him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="480">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>So if the State witnesses said that you just came up behind him and there was no stopping, you just shot him, that is not correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="481">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>He is correct to say I shot him from a position where I was behind the deceased, but it is not true that I came from behind and shot him before I reached him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="482">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Why would Sipho Maseko lie about the fact that you may have spoken to this chap, that you might have stopped and spoken to him?  What difference would it make to him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="483">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I think he had a motive, because he wanted me to be convicted, because he was an ANC member.  He wanted it to come out that I was not a good person in the area.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="484">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>One thing that you have told us, doesn&#039;t make sense to me, and that is what you told us about the vow that this person, this deceased person made.  Why would somebody that has made a vow to kill you, come to you and tell you that he has made a vow to kill you?  Surely that would defeat the purpose of his vow?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="485">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Every time that you saw him, he would know that you were thinking well, he is going to kill me now?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="486">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I explained that he said that before I took a decision to kill him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="487">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Yes, precisely.  But if you have made a vow to kill somebody, you wouldn&#039;t go and tell him, would you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="488">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, correct I wouldn&#039;t do it myself.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="489">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Is it correct that you were previously a member of the ANC?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="490">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="491">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>And that in fact you left the ANC to join the IFP?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="492">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="493">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>You and the deceased were friends up until that time when you left the ANC?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="494">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>No, we were not exactly friends, I just regarded him as one of the members of the party.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="495">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>So he was just somebody that you grew up with and played together, but you weren&#039;t friends as such?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="496">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="497">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>When did the differences between you, start?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="498">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I think the differences started in 1992, about November.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="499">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Is that when you left the ANC?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="500">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>It was sometime after I have left the ANC.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="501">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>So even though you had left the ANC and you went to its rival organisation, there was still no bad blood between you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="502">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="503">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Just one last thing, do you remember that you made an application for indemnity?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="504">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="505">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>And you said that the motive for killing the deceased in that application, was so that your organisation could win the 1994 election?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="506">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>To explain about the indemnity application, the purpose for making such an application was just to get some way to get out of prison, because it was a terrible place to be.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="507">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I thought maybe if I tried to apply for indemnity, I will get a chance to get out of prison.  Thereafter I discovered that there is a Commission on which we can come and apply for amnesty.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="508">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>I see, so that is a lie what you have put here?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="509">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>That is not true, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="510">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Just one last thing, very last thing.  You said there were many reasons why you wanted to kill the deceased, and when you were asked to expand on the many reasons, the only other reason you gave, was that he harassed people, which was basically the same as the first reason you gave.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="511">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	What other reasons are there that make up the many reasons you have told us about?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="512">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, there was one which I just remembered now.  One night, while I was at home, inside the house, I saw him together with another young man by the name of Themba, holding a five litre petrol.  I saw them with this five litre petrol, when I saw them holding, it is a 25 litre, not a five litre petrol, my uncle was still alive at that time, I called him out to come and see what I was seeing.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="513">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	He came out and also expressed his views that these young men is a problem, and expressed that he is one of the people who are preventing us from getting more support.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="514">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>If all your members were complaining, including your uncle, about this harassment, why did you take the decision on your own, why didn&#039;t you take it as part of your structures?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="515">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Everybody in your structure was complaining, this man is harassing us, didn&#039;t you discuss this together in your structure and come to that decision?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="516">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>To explain, I will say that the other members in that area, were few or were young, so I realised that maybe if I tell them about this planning, they might leak the information out and I might be arrested.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="517">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	In most cases, we wouldn&#039;t tell women, female members about incidents like this, that we are going to attack a particular person.  I knew that they could be easily influenced somehow, that they can leak out the information.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="518">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	They are not strong enough to keep the information.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="519">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>The issue was, these were the very people who were complaining about this man, your members.  They came to you, they told you he is harassing us, threatening us with pangas, we can&#039;t walk in the streets, you tell us of another incident with the petrol - surely you, together in your meetings said, well, what are we going to do about this guy?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="520">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I didn&#039;t sit with them at any meeting, but I knew that if I killed him, they will know that I am the one who killed him, and they would be happy about it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="521">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="522">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Claassen and Ms Thabete, I will have to request for your direction.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="523">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I wonder if this would be an appropriate time to take lunch adjournment?  I have only one aspect to pursue with Mr Mtambo, whereafter I think you can be ready to give us your addresses, which I think shouldn&#039;t take long, because we have scheduled another matter today and I would like us to finish that matter today.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="524">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Do you propose that we take a lunch adjournment now or we conclude this matter and take our adjournment at half past one?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="525">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Madam Chair, I have no specific preference, it is entirely up to the Committee, I am easy both ways.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="526">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Maybe it is an issue which really impinges on people who are far much more important than the members of the Committee, and that is the Logistics Officers - I can&#039;t locate them now, they don&#039;t seem to be around, and the Translators.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="527">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I wonder if they can just respond whether they would prefer that we take a 30 minute adjournment now, or we only adjourn at half past one?  Will that be okay if we adjourned at half past one?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="528">
			<speaker>INTERPRETER</speaker>
			<text>It looks like it will be fine.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="529">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Ms Thabete, will that be fine with you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="530">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>It will be fine Madam Chair, but I wanted to do some redirect, and just one question, and also I had intended to call one witness from the victims&#039; side who would like to testify.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="531">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  Is it only one witness?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="532">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>It is only one witness, Madam Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="533">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>In that case, would you propose that we adjourn now?  Let&#039;s hear an indication from the Logistics Officers, because there are quite a number of things that really impinges on other people rather than us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="534">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	We are unfortunately requested to have our adjournment now, rather than later, for logistical reasons.   We will then adjourn and reconvene at half past one.  Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="535">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="536">
			<speaker>SOLOMON COLLEN MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>(still under oath)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="537">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>In your evidence, you have testified and your testimony would seem to suggest that the information that you got from one Duduza Qaba, that you must be aware that the comrades wanted to kill you, it is that information that made you sensitive to the fact that the deceased Mr Mshenga was one comrade who wanted to kill you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="538">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Did I understand your evidence to suggest that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="539">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="540">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You then went on to say that two days approximately, two days before that incident, you had been informed by the deceased himself, of his intention to kill you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="541">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>May you please, I don&#039;t understand, especially with reference to the two days before.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="542">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I understood your evidence to say that the deceased had vowed that he would kill you, he told you that he would kill you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="543">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, he said that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="544">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You went on to say that he told you that he would kill you, two days before you killed him?  That was your approximation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="545">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>That is not correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="546">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>May we then correct that part of your evidence, when did he tell you that he would kill you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="547">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I can&#039;t remember because it was, there was a long period from the time he told me to the time I killed him, but I don&#039;t remember the exact time.  I won&#039;t be able to say the exact date when he told me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="548">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>When did Duduza Qaba warn you about the comrades wanting to kill you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="549">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>It was on Saturday, 29th of May 1993.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="550">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>How long after the deceased had informed you of his intention to kill you, was it a week before, or a month before the 29th of May 1993?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="551">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Duduza was the second one to tell me that I was going to be killed.  The deceased himself told me, earlier before Duduza could do so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="552">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  All I want to know is whether you can approximate in terms of weeks, whether the deceased told you a week before Duduza warned you about the comrades wanting to kill you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="553">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I would like to apologise in that I wouldn&#039;t be able to give the specific time, because what was important at the time, to me, it was the words that he said to me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="554">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	The time period, it is difficult for me to estimate exactly when it was.  I can&#039;t remember.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="555">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>When he told you of his intention to kill you, did you believe him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="556">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="557">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And you felt threatened by that intention?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="558">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="559">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yet, you can&#039;t remember when that was said?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="560">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I won&#039;t be able to remember the date and the month, what I can remember is the place where we were at the time, and also as to what was happening.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="561">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Subsequent to him saying that, what did you do?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="562">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I didn&#039;t do anything.  I just informed the people who were in my company, that he intended to kill me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="563">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Even if he doesn&#039;t himself, personally kill me, they should know that I am on the list, I am going to be killed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="564">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>As soon as you were told by him, of his intention to kill you, you then intended to kill him yourself?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="565">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t understand the question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="566">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Once you became aware that he intended to kill you, you then also developed an intention, you cultivated an intention to kill him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="567">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>You mean I developed the intention to kill him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="568">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="569">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>No, I didn&#039;t have the plans to kill him at the time.  I started developing that intention or making plans to kill him, after realising what he did to other people, not only directly to me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="570">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So it wasn&#039;t the fact that he had vowed to kill you, that made you kill him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="571">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that was not the only reason.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="572">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I am getting very confused if that is so, because I thought that was the basis of your application?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="573">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I have been trying to explain that these are the things that he said and also did some of the things to other members of the Inkatha people, Inkatha members.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="574">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	It is not only because he made a vow to kill me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="575">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, in your application, at page 8, you explain yourself as follows, I shot dead Mr Mshenga Phumayo on self defence after he attempted to shoot me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="576">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I think I have already denied that and give reasons.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="577">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I am aware of that.  Yes, then you proceed to say I earlier received a tip to the effect that the deceased made a vow that if I could be eliminated, the organisation in our region, will have a peace of mind.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="578">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I got the rumours.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="579">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, and you then proceed to say I was also told that they have planned to kill me?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="580">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="581">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Are these not the reasons why you killed him as stated in your application?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="582">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>These are some of the reasons why I killed him.  What I want to emphasise is the reason why I wanted to kill him, even myself, I was afraid of him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="583">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You killed him, because you were afraid of him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="584">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>No, if he wasn&#039;t doing anything to myself or the other members of the organisation, or the organisation itself, I wasn&#039;t going to kill him because I think no one has the right to kill someone else without a reason.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="585">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>If you could encapsulate your reason or reasons for killing Mr Phumayo, what would you say they are?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="586">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I can put forward the following reasons.  I would like to apologise to drag you back what I have said before.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="587">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Firstly I said he was a b rave person, I was afraid of him, and we, the members of Inkatha in kwaDela, we were the minority and I knew that if I were to be killed first, the Inkatha will be extinguished in the area, because I would be gone.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="588">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	That is the reason why I took a decision that  we should kill him, in order to establish good support in that area.  We were so few if I were to count before the Commission, there were a few young male members and a few female members.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="589">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Who was the Chairperson of the IFP locally in Davel?  The local branch, I am not talking about the Youth Brigade?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="590">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>It was Napoleon Nkonza.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="591">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The meeting that you held at the creche where you yourself took a decision to kill Phumayo, did he attend that meeting?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="592">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>No, but we did inform him and he knew that we normally had weekly meetings.  After two weeks, we used to have meetings and he knew about it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="593">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Who had convened that meeting?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="594">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I personally, I was involved, I was in charge of arranging meetings.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="595">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What was the purpose of holding that meeting?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="596">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Most people had recently joined the party, and they didn&#039;t know much about the policies of the party.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="597">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	They didn&#039;t know practical things like if you were to be found, not in line with ... (tape ends) ... therefore we will meet, so that we can inform them about the disciplinary procedures and the policies of the party.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="598">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Was the issue of Mr Phumayo discussed at that meeting?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="599">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I tried to explain that I was afraid to inform these young people about this planning, because if I did so, it would be easy for me to be arrested, because if police came to investigate the case and question them, they might leak information.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="600">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Therefore I decided to make it a secret, not to tell the others.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="601">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did you discuss with the Chairperson of the IFP locally in Davel, your intention to kill Mr Phumayo in order to advance the interest of your party?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="602">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I didn&#039;t tell the Chairperson, Mr Nkonza himself.  The person whom I discussed this with, was Mtimzimotha who was the Chairperson of the Youth in Ermelo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="603">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Why was Mr Nkonza as the Chairperson of the organisation, not made privy of your intention to do something that would have advanced the interest of the IFP?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="604">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I knew that he was not going to allow me to go and do it, since he had a high ranking position and he was afraid to be finding himself in a position where he could have given such instructions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="605">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I will say it will be so difficult as a grown up person, even at home, we are not allowed in our tradition, to send each other to go and do bad things.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="606">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Are you saying it was not the policy of the IFP to kill political opponents and that is the policy you knew, and that is why you didn&#039;t tell Mr Nkonza because you knew he would abide by that policy of the party?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="607">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>That is not correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="608">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So why should you not make him privy and further, why would he not have allowed you if that was the policy of the party?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="609">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I didn&#039;t see the reason to go and see and tell him, but however, when I was at the police station, I did tell him the truth, that I am the one who did it, and I knew that after doing it, you will know that I did it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="610">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mtambo, I had earlier on asked you a very simple question, why you did not tell the Chairperson of the organisation about something that would have advanced the interest of the party, and your response was that you knew that he would not have allowed you to kill Mr Phumayo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="611">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="612">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So why should he not allow you to kill Mr Phumayo if it was the policy of the party to kill its political opponent?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="613">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>He will refuse to allow me to commit the act because he might have thought maybe I will also issue instructions, there might be a situation where I will also issue instructions to other people, to commit such acts.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="614">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	There wasn&#039;t a single day where he gave us instructions to go and kill and it was us who were responsible of looking at the situation, and trying to find the ways how to protect ourselves if we are attacked, we will go and attack on our own.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="615">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Isn&#039;t it speculation on your part to say that he would have refused, had there been an instant where you had so requested and such a request was refused by Mr Nkonza?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="616">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I never stood before him and told him this is what we were going to do, before.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="617">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I thought you used the word courage, I don&#039;t know if my question was properly translated to you.  Is it not speculation on your part to say that Mr Nkonza would have refused you permission to kill Mr Phumayo if you had so requested?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="618">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="619">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And that hinges on my further question being, have there been an instance wherein such a request, such a similar request, had been refused by Mr Nkonza?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="620">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>He always instructed us that we should stay in one place, in houses, so that if they start to attack us, we should defend ourselves.  However, he never issued instructions that we should go for a specific purpose to say, go and kill because you have been killed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="621">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>On the night in question, when you killed Mr Phumayo, had you not seen him next to the electrical box, you wouldn&#039;t have been able to have carried out the killing?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="622">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I was hunting him, trying to find him.  I will get information.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="623">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>How long did this hunting last before you actually committed the offence for which you are asking for amnesty?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="624">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>It took a long time, because my wish was to do it in such a way that it will be a, I will do the act and it will be unknown, nobody will know how he was killed and who killed him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="625">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I didn&#039;t want this to come into light within the community, because that would destroy the organisation&#039;s image, as it happened now that I have killed him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="626">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I find that a little interesting in passing, that you did not want the person who would have killed Mr Phumayo, to come to light, because it would destroy the image of your organisation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="627">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I understood your evidence to have meant that the reason for killing Phumayo was to intimidate the members in order to join the organisation.  If your intention was to suppress any information, about the people who were responsible for his death, how would that intimidate ANC members to a point of making them jump ship, to come to the IFP and join the organisation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="628">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I would like to explain.  If that happened, probably the ANC people would definitely have known that he has been killed by Inkatha, even if they don&#039;t know who exactly killed him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="629">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But haven&#039;t you said that you didn&#039;t want the members of the community to know about how Mr Phumayo had been killed, because if that act was associated with the IFP, it would destroy the IFP?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="630">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.   I tried to hide that so that when they come to  join our party, they shall take us as people who have just been started by the other party, as the innocent party.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="631">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But those are the people who would hardly have been intimidated by the act of Mr Phumayo&#039;s death?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="632">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I find it difficult to answer the question, but to say as I have said before, if we kill him, we thought we would achieve some, gaining members joining us, and that is the way we did it, and we expected them to be afraid and join us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="633">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I also find it difficult to comprehend how that would be tantamount to an intimidation, that would increase your membership as you have testified.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="634">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	In your evidence you say that you were hunting for Mr Phumayo for a long time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="635">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="636">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Because of your intention to kill him immediately?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="637">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, because of what he has already said.  If he didn&#039;t mention any killings, I wasn&#039;t going to hunt him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="638">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I tried to speak to him about the situation at Davel and I told him that I didn&#039;t like what was going on, but what he said is that if we were not all dead, there was nothing that was going to be sorted out.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="639">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I am just confining myself to the hunting.  You were hunting for Mr Phumayo.  Just try and confine yourself to what has been put to you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="640">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	How did this hunting, what form did it take?  How did you hunt for him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="641">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>It will happen at night.  Sometimes we would see them, burning houses.  He was always in front of the people who were burning houses.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="642">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	That is why I was hunting him, or that is the way I used to hunt him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="643">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Had you seen him in the course of burning houses down, is it your evidence that you would then have been able to kill him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="644">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I have seen him too many times.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="645">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t know whether my question was translated to you properly.  Is it your evidence, are you suggesting that if you had seen him burning houses down, you would have been able to kill him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="646">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="647">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Even though you would have been in the company of the other comrades?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="648">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.  What we had in mind was that if we were going to get hold of them, we were going to kill them, or attack them, because they used to burn down old people&#039;s houses, who were members and who didn&#039;t have other people to protect them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="649">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	We didn&#039;t want to lose members.  Members were going to be scared to be members of the IFP if we were not protecting them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="650">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And you would have so killed him in the presence of the comrades, notwithstanding your earlier evidence that your intention was that you should kill him under circumstances where it would not lead to the IFP being associated with his death?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="651">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>If I have to explain, what I really wanted is that I didn&#039;t want the ANC people to know that I was the one who killed him, because I knew if they had to find out, they were going to revenge.  The comrades were going to revenge on us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="652">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>This is what puzzles me and this is why I asked you that question.  You are saying that you would have killed Phumayo, even where other comrades would have been present?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="653">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	That would have exposed your organisation to the wroth of the community, because they will know from the comrades, who killed him?  Do you see the contradiction in your evidence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="654">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I think I have explained, if I am not mistaken, that we were going to attack all of them, not just him so that the person who was attacked, or whom his or her house was being attacked, was going to know that we were the ones who were responsible in protecting him or her.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="655">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	It is not that we wanted to expose ourselves in front of the ANC.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="656">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You used the plural term, you say we would have attacked all of them.  What do you mean by that, you mean yourself and who?  Did you operate as a group?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="657">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I thought you did not want anyone to be aware of your intention to kill Mr Phumayo, least it leaks out?  I thought you were the only one who was going to be involved in this operation, and nobody else?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="658">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Now I hear you are using the plural term in your evidence.  Is that intentional?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="659">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I alone, my apologies there.  I was the one who was willing to do everything on my own.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="660">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	My name was named as someone who was going to be the victim.  It wasn&#039;t because of hatred, because we never quarrelled, it was because of our affiliations.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="661">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You are unable to say how you hunted Mr Phumayo, because this all emanates from the question, which I earlier on posed.  How did you hunt for Phumayo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="662">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I meant that if we found him doing something to other members of the IFP, I wasn&#039;t going to take this any longer.  I was gong to pay revenge there and then.  They have done this too many times to IFP members.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="663">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You keep on referring to the plural term though I take it that you mean yourself?  The simple question is what did you do, what steps, what active steps did you do to kill him, before the day in question?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="664">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Is it not your evidence that you knew where Mr Phumayo stayed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="665">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>That is my evidence, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="666">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Why didn&#039;t you go to his house to kill him, you seem to have hunted for him for a long time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="667">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>What made me unable to go to his house, I didn&#039;t have his direction as to where he was staying, or how he was staying.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="668">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mtambo, with due respect, that is not the evidence that you led before this Committee, you stated categorically that you knew where mr Phumayo stayed.  This is the evidence I vividly recall.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="669">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>When I said I know his house, I meant his parents&#039; house.  If I went to attack him at his parents&#039; house, I was going to end up hurting other people, like old people.  I didn&#039;t want that to happen.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="670">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Do you really want us to believe that when you said his house, you meant his parents&#039; house and you didn&#039;t want to hurt other people?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="671">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	My simple question is, you knew where Phumayo lived, that is your evidence, I&#039;ve got a note here.  When questions were put to you by Mr Lax, your answer was very specific.  You said you knew where Phumayo lived, whether that be his parents&#039; house or whether that be his own house, that is neither here nor there.  You knew where he lived.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="672">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="673">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Why are you being dishonest in that point?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="674">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>The situation was bad and in my mind, it didn&#039;t occur that I can use this type of method in order to attack or to kill.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="675">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>In fact, to correct myself, you stated that you knew where Phumayo lived when you were being cross-examined by Ms Thabete, according to my notes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="676">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Your answer was very clear, yes, I knew where Phumayo lived and that his house was very far.  No, it was put to you that his house was very far from, no his house was quite nearer to Maria&#039;s house, and your response was, no, his house was very far from Maria&#039;s house, thus confirming that you really knew where Phumayo lived.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="677">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I knew him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="678">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Why are you being dishonest?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="679">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>My apologies there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="680">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Do you know Mr Tunzi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="681">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Mtunzi or Tunzi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="682">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>It could have been Mtunzi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="683">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I do know him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="684">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>How do you know him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="685">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>As I have already explained that he was the Chairman of the Youth Brigade, his name is Mtunzi Mote.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="686">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Is it the same person who is referred to in the criminal court judgement on page 22, last paragraph, second line Mr Claassen?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="687">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Do you remember the evidence that was led during your criminal trial and the testimony of one Absolom Mkwetrani, who stated that he saw you handing the gun that you had used to shoot Mr Phumayo, to a person who was then referred to as Tunzi, who then climbed in through the window of a nearby house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="688">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>This statement was mentioned by a witness in court, and it wasn&#039;t true.  I took the gun and I hid it under the coal.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="689">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Do you know the Tunzi who is being referred to in this judgement?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="690">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I do.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="691">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>How do you know him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="692">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>As a member of IFP.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="693">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Is it the same person as Mtunzi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="694">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he is.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="695">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Was he there when you shot Mr Phumayo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="696">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he was.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="697">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Was he with you when you shot Mr Phumayo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="698">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he was with me but when I shot Mr Phumayo, he wasn&#039;t there.  I shot him when I was alone.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="699">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>When you came out of maria&#039;s house, after having noticed Mr Phumayo next to the electrical box, did you come out of that house with Mr Tunzi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="700">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>No, I wasn&#039;t with him.  I didn&#039;t mention anything to him.  I only told him after I had done so and I told him that I was the one who killed him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="701">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>When you said earlier on that Mr Tunzi was there when you shot Mr Phumayo, what did you mean, at which stage was he there when you shot Mr Phumayo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="702">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Tunzi wasn&#039;t there.  Maybe I made a mistake, my apology there.  He wasn&#039;t there when this incident occurred, I was alone.  My apologies there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="703">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>How did you come to make this mistake?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="704">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Maybe I didn&#039;t understand exactly what the question referred to, whether you were referring that he was right at the scene of the incident, or inside the house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="705">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I thought my question was quite clear.  I haven&#039;t written it down,but i seem to recall myself saying was Tunzi there when you shot Mr Phumayo and your response was yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="706">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it is like that, that is why I am asking for an apology because I didn&#039;t understand well.  I didn&#039;t get it whether the Chairperson meant if he was present at the scene of the incident, or inside the house, Maria&#039;s house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="707">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>No, I mean if - the question was, was Tunzi there when you shot Mr Phumayo, why should it be difficult, why should it ascertain information other than what it is intended to?  Was he there when Phumayo was shot, and the simple answer was yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="708">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Why should you think that I meant whether he was in Maria&#039;s house because we are talking about the shooting of Phumayo, which on your version, occurred next to the electrical box, and definitely not in Maria&#039;s house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="709">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>It is not clear to me and my apologies.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="710">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You again made a mistake there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="711">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="712">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You also made a mistaken in your application, on page 8 when you said that you shot Mr Phumayo on self defence, after he had attempted to shoot you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="713">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>It is not true that he was trying to shoot me.  The truth is that I am the one who shot him.  He didn&#039;t try to shoot me.  He didn&#039;t even try to look for something or to fight back.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="714">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, now why did you lie when you were applying for amnesty?  You have used the words I lied, now why did you lie?  You say that those were lies, why did you lie when applying for amnesty?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="715">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, my apologies, these were my attempts trying to get out or to avoid being sentenced, but now that I am here before this Commission, I am telling the truth.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="716">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, but now you didn&#039;t lie in court, you are lying when completing an application form for amnesty?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="717">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t remember very well because the person who came to see me in prison, to take a statement, he was in a hurry.  He didn&#039;t even give me a chance to try and picture as to what happened on that day.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="718">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Now that we are talking about this, it comes back to my mind as to what happened, what exactly happened on that day.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="719">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Who assisted you in completing your application form, that is the one dated the 30th of September 1997 at Barberton?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="720">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>One guy who came and told me he was sent by Attorneys and his name is Lucas Louw.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="721">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Which Attorneys were those, were those your lawyers?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="722">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I only know of Mr Van der Merwe.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="723">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did he purport to come from Mr Van der Merwe&#039;s office?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="724">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="725">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You trusted him because he came from your own lawyer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="726">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>No, I didn&#039;t trust him.  The only person I used to trust was Mr Van der Merwe, and he used to come on his own, if ever we needed to fix something.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="727">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But this person came from Mr Van der Merwe&#039;s office, that is your evidence?  Why should you not trust him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="728">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>What I can say is that in that prison where I am staying, me and other IFP members, who are in prison, we are facing hardship.  That is why I didn&#039;t trust this person who said he was from Nelspruit Van der Merwe, I didn&#039;t trust him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="729">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But you went on again, and signed a statement.  Do you recall signing this statement, which appears on page 28?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="730">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I remember very well.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="731">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And in that statement, you again allege that you shot Mr Phumayo in self defence after he had attempted to take out his firearm to shoot at you?  It is then that you immediately shot him back on the side of his head?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="732">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="733">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Was that also a mistake?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="734">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it was.  I said this lie.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="735">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You said a lie?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="736">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="737">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Can you advance any plausible reason why you should say a lie in that statement?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="738">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I didn&#039;t know.  What I thought was if I put it like this, I was going to get out.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="739">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The person to whom you made this statement, identified himself as the Investigator from the Truth Commission, didn&#039;t he?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="740">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>He did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="741">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Would you have any reason not to trust a person who was coming from the Truth Commission, which was the process you wanted to confide in in order to get amnesty?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="742">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>The reason that made me mistrust this person, it is because I didn&#039;t know that if you make an application to the Truth Commission, there are other people who are coming, making a follow up, after your first application, there are others who are coming and take other statements.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="743">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I got confused, I didn&#039;t understand how many people was I supposed to see.  Therefore I was confused.  That is why then even my testimony is contradicting.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="744">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But why did you lie then to him, if you did not trust him?  Why did you even say that your action was as a result of Mr Phumayo wanting to shoot you?  Why did you have to lie if you did not trust him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="745">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>My apologies then, I thought I was defending myself.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="746">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yet, on paragraph 2 of that statement, you stated the same evidence that you have testified to today, that you received information from Duduza Qaba that said you must be careful of the comrades.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="747">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	It is the same information that you have today testified to.   So you lied in certain respects, but told the truth in other respects?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="748">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>When it comes to Duduza Qaba, my reasons for giving his name out, was that there was no secret, I didn&#039;t see any reason why I should hide that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="749">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	He is the one who came to me and the reason that I actually took action on my decision, is that I have already heard from other people that I was in danger, because of the comrades.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="750">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, the fact of the matter is that you lied in certain respects, but told the truth in other respects, even though you did not trust the person to whom you were making a statement?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="751">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>My apologies Chairperson.  I don&#039;t know how I should apologise, but from the bottom of my heart, my apologies and I have done this thing.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="752">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Mr Claassen, emanating from the questions put to Mr Mtambo by this panel, do you have any re-examination?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="753">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Madam Chair, I think there was a single aspect, but it was cleared up concerning a reply, I think it was a question from Mr Lax, whether he - but I believe it was cleared up, it was a question which just wasn&#039;t clear whether he answered positively on it, but I think it was cleared up.  Nothing further from me, thank you Madam Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="754">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR CLAASSEN</text>
		</line>
		<line number="755">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Are you proposing to close your case?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="756">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>I am Madam Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="757">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>No further witnesses to be called in support of his application?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="758">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>No further witnesses Madam Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="759">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Ms Thabete.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="760">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>Madam Chair, if you could allow me just to raise one aspect in my re-examination to Mr Mtambo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="761">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You have no right to a re-examination, Ms Thabete.  It is only Mr Claassen who have such a right.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="762">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>Okay, thank you Madam Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="763">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You will have to apply to re-open an opportunity to put further questions to Mr Mtambo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="764">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Madam Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="765">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What is the basis of your application?  Why do you want to put further questions, when your opportunity has long since passed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="766">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>It is something that had arisen in one of the questions that was raised by the Committee members.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="767">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Then in that case, please do so.  How many questions do you have?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="768">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>It is one question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="769">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You may proceed to put that question to him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="770">
			<speaker>FURTHER CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Madam Chair, I am indebted to you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="771">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Mtambo, you have testified that you feared the deceased, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="772">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="773">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>So, would it be correct to say that you actually followed him and shot him from the back, because you feared him, you were scared of him?  Would that be a correct statement to put to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="774">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="775">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>I am asking this because it is my instructions that I should put it to you that you actually followed the deceased and you shot him at the back, because you were scared of him, not because of all the other reasons that you have given today.  What is your response to that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="776">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>That is not correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="777">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, no questions, Madam Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="778">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MS THABETE</text>
		</line>
		<line number="779">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I wouldn&#039;t begin to understand then the whole evidence, if you say that is not true?  Hasn&#039;t it been your evidence that this was a brave man who committed other acts of atrocities against your members, and you were all scared of him, and to quote you, you said I, myself were scared of him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="780">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>When I committed this act, I have already put together every reason that I had.  That is why I ended up killing him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="781">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Were you or were you not scared of him, was he or was he not, a brave person who also intimidated your members?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="782">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I was scared of him, yes, I was scared of him, and that is the truth.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="783">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I have seen him, the way he was operating and he liked his organisation, that is why I was scared of him.  I once thought that he was advanced in knowledge when it comes to ANC.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="784">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
		<line number="785">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Ms Thabete, do you have any witnesses to call on behalf of the objectors?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="786">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>Yes Madam Chair, just one witness, Mr Trevor Phumayo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="787">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Is he going to testify?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="788">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he is going to testify.  He is seated on my left hand side.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="789">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You said the name was Trevor who?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="790">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>Trevor Phumayo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="791">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Phumayo, do you understand English?  You will do without the use of the microphone?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="792">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="793">
			<speaker>TREVOR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="794">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You have been duly sworn, you can take a seat.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="795">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>Mr  Phumayo, how are you related to the deceased?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="796">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>His father and my father, are brothers.  I can say his father is my uncle.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="797">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You mean the deceased was your uncle?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="798">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>The father of the deceased.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="799">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Was your uncle?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="800">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="801">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>Was the deceased an active member of the ANC?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="802">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he was.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="803">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>According to your knowledge, did he harass IFP people?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="804">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>I can&#039;t recollect anything on that matter, but I don&#039;t think he did.  There is nothing which I have seen him doing, you know, harassing the IFP members, and even on top of that, there could have been no reason for him to do that, because the ANC was dominating the area.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="805">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	The IFP as the applicant has already put before the Commission, that it was having very little members, so it was an organisation which the ANC could not worry about at all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="806">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Can you explain to the Committee members, what was the deceased doing on the day of the incident, next to, or on the street where Maria&#039;s shibeen was?  Where was he going?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="807">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, actually he was just from his home, because there was a home on the same street, but on the lower part, you know of the street, and there was a house of his friend there.  The family have evacuated the place, I don&#039;t know the reasons, but he was asked to go and stay there for protecting purposes or something like that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="808">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	As usual, he just used that street and frequented it in going to that house where he used to sleep during those days.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="809">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Are you saying that he was staying in a house which was on the same street as Maria&#039;s shibeen?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="810">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, during that period, yes, but it was a little bit far down on the road.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="811">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, but nevertheless on the same street?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="812">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="813">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And for how long had he been in temporary residence thereat?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="814">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>I cannot remember well, how long was he staying there by that time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="815">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Could it be probably a day or two, could it be that short?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="816">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>It could be some, a few weeks, not days, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="817">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>A few weeks?  Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="818">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>May I just ask you, you say he was staying there for protecting purposes.  Who and against whom was he protecting?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="819">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>It was only to protect the things like the property, the furniture because there was no one against you know, being stolen and things like that.  Thank you very much.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="820">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Just one follow up question if I may.  To get to and from that place, he would have had to pass Maria&#039;s on a regular basis, frequently?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="821">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>It depended on whether he choose to do so, but if he was coming from his home, then it was very much probable that he will pass through Maria&#039;s home, because it was on the top, his home, so he had to go you know, in that street, but he could have maybe used the option of going down on that street maybe, but it was a little bit far.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="822">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Maybe if he was near the shops or something like that, but if maybe he was from his home, he usually used that way, through Maria&#039;s home.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="823">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Proceed Ms Thabete.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="824">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Would you say this street where Maria&#039;s shibeen was, was a no go zone for people who were not IFP members?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="825">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>Not for any matter, because I don&#039;t think so, there was no no go street, during that time in the area, you know.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="826">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Are you saying that any inhabitant in Davel, could walk along any street that he so wished without fear of being attacked by any political organisation, whether it by IFP or ANC?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="827">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>Precisely at that juncture, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="828">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>When you say at that juncture, when did the no go areas then come into existence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="829">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>Well maybe if I can try to make some clarifications there, you know there were sometimes when there were turmoils in the area, where there were political conflicts, although there were no specific streets which you could have said this street shall not be frequented by ANC members, but maybe you will find that the IFP members have gathered in that street, for that day or maybe those times, maybe they were having meetings or something like that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="830">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	You will find that the ANC members, would not go to that street during that time, when there was this fightings in the location or whatsoever, but if there were no fightings, even at that particular moment, you could have used any street, as you pleased especially during the day.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="831">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Now this happened at night, and we are told it happened after eight o&#039;clock at night.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="832">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="833">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Was it normal around the 29th of May 1993, for ordinary citizens of Davel to walk around any street without fear of being attacked by any political organisation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="834">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>Of course yes, because as I have said, maybe two answer that question very concisely and clearly, I can maybe draw you to the political context of that time.  I can say that during the 1990&#039;s and 1991 and early 1992, there was a political conflict and turmoil during those times, and if I can recollect very clearly, the last incident where someone was killed in a political conflict, was round about early in 1992, actually a certain ANC member was killed there, and that was the last.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="835">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Thereafter things turned to be, you know, to subside.  There were no conflicts at all, although there was that tension between the people, but that was no longer exposed, and it was no longer this fighting between the two organisations and whatsoever.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="836">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	That is why I am saying at that particular juncture, you know, you could have not, you know, frequented those streets during 1990, 1992, 1992, but in 1993, yes it was normal for a person, even up to nine, ten, eleven, you know, things has gone to a normal situation indeed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="837">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Ms Thabete?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="838">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Mr Phumayo, the applicant Mr Mtambo, has applied for amnesty.  What is your response to that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="839">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>Well, there is a lot I can say there, but maybe just to recap what has already been said, because I think a lot has been said and done.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="840">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	You know from what has happened on that day and the allegations and all that, and taking into consideration again, what happened in the criminal case at Secunda, because we also attended that, and after you know, looking at the statements of the applicants and all that, we find that there are a lot of mysteries which keep on coming in in this issue.  We thought if we come here, we will come even nearer to finding the real truth, you see.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="841">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	We hoped that the applicant will be in a position whereby he will be able to disclose everything and in a truthful manner, but it seems as if we are moving even far away from where the truth is. </text>
		</line>
		<line number="842">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	To answer your question directly then, firstly I will say in the issue of a motive, a political motive, I think it stands to reason that even the Judge in the criminal court said that he could not see the motive for Mr Mtambo to kill Mr Phumayo, so I think even here, I could not see anything creeping out from the evidence, which he has adduced, that can bring us nearer to any truth or fact, what was his motive really because there are a lot of reasons you see, and we cannot even verify which one is valid and whatsoever.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="843">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	To come away even on that, on the issue again of full disclosure, I think he also has left a lot of things undesired, because if you look at the issue of people who he could maybe have implicated there, you talk about Mr Mtunzi, you know, he could have maybe been implicated in the event and whatsoever.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="844">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I think maybe in a nutshell, I can say he is trying to protect other elements maybe.  That is an opinion indeed, but there is no full disclosure, in a nutshell, I can say so.  Therefore you know, is stands to reason that as the victims and the family, we have discussed this issue, and we said that it can be very much difficult that there can be an amnesty granted to the applicant on that issue.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="845">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Madam Chair, no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="846">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MS THABETE</text>
		</line>
		<line number="847">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Claassen, do you have any questions to put to Mr Phumayo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="848">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>I have some questions, Madam Chair.  Mr Phumayo, just very briefly, you started by stating that your, I presume this was your cousin, the deceased was your cousin, was he - you said he was an active member of the ANC, what rank did he hold in the ANC?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="849">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>Actually he held no position at all, you know, in the Executive, but he was just active, especially in chanting and slanting, some things like that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="850">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	He did not hold any top position like in the Executive or even in the Youth League as such.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="851">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Phumayo, it is my instruction from the applicant, that the deceased was a Chairman in the ANC at that time, what would your response be to that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="852">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>ANC Youth League?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="853">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Madam Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="854">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>Maybe if I can remind the applicant, by that time, because it was shortly after he had departed from the ANC to the IFP, if maybe he cannot recollect very well that during that time, the Chairperson of the Youth League was David Nkosi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="855">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	He held the position for consecutive years, because in many of the conferences he was chosen, so there is no way where you can find that Mshenga Phumayo was a Chairperson of the Youth League during that period.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="856">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did you consult with Ms Thabete on this issue?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="857">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>Me?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="858">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, did you advise Ms Thabete that David Nkosi was the Chair of the ANC Youth League at the time when this murder was committed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="859">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>I told her that Mr Phumayo was never a Chairperson of the ANC.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="860">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did you advise her that David Nkosi was in fact the Chair?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="861">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>No, I did not advise her on that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="862">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Had it been so, Ms Thabete, we would have thought it should have been your duty to have put that question specifically to Mr Mtambo, to enable him to fairly comment on that issue.  We regard it as an important issue which would go to show that there was no motive for the killing of Mr Phumayo as alleged by him, in that he was the Chairperson of the ANC Youth League.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="863">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	As it stands now, Mr Mtambo has not been afforded an opportunity to so comment and we may have to reopen that case to enable him to comment on that important aspect.  It is a matter that I will have to discuss with the members of my Committee.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="864">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	It is a matter though Mr Claassen, that you can also take up with us, whether we should reopen Mr Mtambo&#039;s evidence to enable him to comment on that aspect of evidence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="865">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>As the Chair pleases Madam Chair, it is my instruction indeed that as I put it to the witness, that according to the applicant, the deceased was to know knowledge, the Youth Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="866">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Phumayo, you just mentioned now that the applicant shortly before the incident, changed alliance from the IFP to the ANC, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="867">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="868">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>So he was known to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="869">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he was.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="870">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Pardon me, what I actually meant to say would just change from the ANC to the IFP.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="871">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Phumayo, did you know what position the applicant held within the IFP?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="872">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>No, I did not.  I didn&#039;t even know that they were having an Executive in the Youth Brigade, because it was only the branch.  If I may refer it as a mother body, you know, which was a little bit organised, but the Youth Brigade, I didn&#039;t know any Executive of it or anything like that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="873">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>But you cannot deny it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="874">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>What sir?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="875">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>That the applicant was the Chairman of the Youth Brigade of the IFP at that stage?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="876">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>Well, I won&#039;t comment on that, you know, I did not know.  I did not know, because I did not have any information about the IFP at that time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="877">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>That is sufficient.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="878">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>I did not know any Chairperson of the Youth Brigade.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="879">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he doesn&#039;t know, he therefore cannot contradict what you are saying.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="880">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Phumayo, you have just in your evidence in chief, you commented to what had happened on the evening, or a certain aspect thereof, of the evening the deceased had been killed.  Where did you get this information?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="881">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>About how the deceased was killed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="882">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>That is correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="883">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>You know, as I have said some were allegations you know, which we heard in the location, and some, I have gathered the information from the criminal trial, from the witnesses there, the three witnesses.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="884">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Everything which you know, went on from there on.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="885">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>But Mr Phumayo, am I not correct in saying that you, yourself, have no or had no first hand knowledge, you were not a witness to the incident and you can therefore not out of your own account, testify what exactly happened?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="886">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>Exactly, I was not an eyewitness, that is why I have said I was also looking at what was actually the real truth, (indistinct) I could not have bothered in looking at what exactly happened.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="887">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Phumayo, you also mentioned that the particular street referred to in which this tavern of Maria was situated, was to your knowledge, I think you specifically said, I do not recollect a no go zone as such to speak of.  Was there at any stage, during that time, the months, the weeks, preceding this incident any incident of intimidation in so far as there were specific zones in the township?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="888">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>No, not at that stage.  Not at that moment, you know, things have started to normalise at that time, and the violence had subsided.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="889">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	There were no intimidations whatsoever, no zone at that particular moment.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="890">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Phumayo, you say not at that stage, prior to that, even further, I think you said that 1990 to 1991, early 1992, was the last occurrence of any violence to your knowledge.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="891">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is what I said indeed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="892">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>During this time, did incidents such as this occur?  There were incidents of intimidation, there were certain parts of the township which was not accessible to certain members of political parties, is that not correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="893">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, to some certain extent so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="894">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Were you fully aware of everything that had been going on in the township at the time preceding the death of the deceased?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="895">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>Of course.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="896">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Phumayo, is it not reasonable to accept that there might have been incidents which you were not aware of?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="897">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>Of course that can be true indeed, because I won&#039;t be in every part of the location every time.  I don&#039;t know whether when you are saying prior to the occurrence of Mr Phumayo&#039;s killing, you mean shortly before that, maybe meaning days or weeks or do you mean before, as I have referred 1991, 1990?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="898">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>No, no, I am talking about the time, weeks, months, immediately preceding the death of the deceased?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="899">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>Certainly I can commit myself in saying that there was no incident, because you know, our location is a very small one.  Every issue which is happening there, you can&#039;t be able, especially if it is a little bit tangible and it needs a lot of attention, you will hear about it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="900">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Even to add to that, the Constable which was a witness in the criminal trial, also testified that there were no such things like conflict or political ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="901">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>We want your evidence Mr Phumayo, we don&#039;t want to find ourselves being extricated to the evidence that was led at the criminal trial, just stick to what you personally know and are aware of.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="902">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I would have actually commented that knowing Davel, it is a relatively small area.  I don&#039;t know that you are aware of how small Davel is, Mr Claassen.  I had an occasion of attending to one matter, it is not far from Ermelo, is it not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="903">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>That is true.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="904">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>It is a fairly small place.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="905">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>I accept that Madam Chair.  Mr Phumayo, just to continue, I think and my note shows that you specifically on a question by Madam Chair, you said when she asked you whether it was at all times safe for anybody to go anywhere in this township, you mentioned that sometimes they do block off the streets.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="906">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Is it then not true that there were certain incidents?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="907">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>To clarify that again, I have said during 1990, 1991, and early 1992, there were such incidents, yes, I agree to that, but from early 1992 backwards, until to the moments you know, prior to the incident of killing Mr Phumayo and thereafter, there were no such things like no go areas and whatsoever and whatsoever.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="908">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Phumayo, it is my instructions from the applicant that there were indeed, on a daily basis, infringements of all different natures, the attempted burning of houses, and it was almost a running battle on a daily basis.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="909">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Apart from that, apart from the houses that have been alluded to, to have been burnt by alleged ANC members, by comrades, what other infringements or incidents has your client referred to?  I am not aware of any other than those?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="910">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	It is the burning down of houses and ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="911">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Madam Chair, if I may, I think he specifically mentioned toyi-toying and stone throwing.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="912">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Phumayo, are you aware of anything that occurred in 1993 that could be part of the violence or part of the conflict that had raged Davel, during the height of the violence in 1991 and 1992?  Are you aware of any such incidents?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="913">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>Not at all Madam Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="914">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Were any persons assaulted by alleged ANC members or supporters, because they were not such ANC members or supporters?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="915">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>Not at the least.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="916">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Were there any incidents wherein perceived IFP members, were assaulted or had their house burnt in 1993?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="917">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="918">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Madam Chair.  Mr Phumayo, just maybe in conclusion, it is also my instructions from the applicant that because of the fact that the IFP as you yourself testified, were the minority in the particular township, they were on a regular basis victimised by the ANC and he also mentioned incidents of knife stabbing and wide scale of intimidation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="919">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t know if maybe you may allow me to elaborate very clearly again on that issue, because I have already hinted on it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="920">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I have said that the IFP was relatively very small and there was no reason for concern that the ANC was supposed to be having.  Therefore, you know, the issues which the ANC has been worried about and taking part in, as I said that the victim was in most instances, found chanting and everything like that, it was in toyi-toying, you know, boycotts, things like that, then it will be then when the question of the clash between IFP and ANC, where it will come, maybe if the ANC has called a boycott, then the IFP will say, no our people has to buy there, our people has to go to work if there are strikes, things like that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="921">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	There was not specifically anything that I can remember now, that the ANC has been concerned with the IFP as such, it was relatively small as I have said before.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="922">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>May I interpose Mr Claassen, just to make a follow up on what Mr Phumayo said.  You say that there were instances where the ANC called for a boycott and the IFP would then not support that call for a boycott?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="923">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="924">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Were such incidents in 1993?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="925">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>No, not in 1993.  1990, 1991, early 1992.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="926">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>In 1993, what would have forced the members of the ANC to chant and toyi-toyi because you have already stated that the deceased was only involved in the chanting and the toyi-toying as a member of the ANC.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="927">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	In what instances would he have been involved in such chanting and toyi-toying?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="928">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t see any reason for him to be involved in such things like that, because as you will see, there were a lot of changes by that time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="929">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	You know, the ANC was busy preparing for things like elections and whatsoever.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="930">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I thought you had said he was, he held no position within the party?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="931">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="932">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Except simply to toyi-toyi.  Was that said in reference to just his general membership and not specifically during the period in 1993?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="933">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>No, to his general membership until he died.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="934">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="935">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>That was the position.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="936">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And the toyi-toying would not be in relation to any particular incident?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="937">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>In 1993?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="938">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>In 1993?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="939">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>In 1993, the only thing which he maybe could have participated in, maybe if there were meetings for you know, campaigning for the elections, some things like that, maybe he would go and chant there and maybe say poems, some things like that, but not  maybe going and there will be fights in the street and things like that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="940">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	No, no, that will certainly not have occurred at that time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="941">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  So it was not conflict related?  According to your evidenced, the violence had subsided tremendously by the beginning of 1993?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="942">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>Absolutely.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="943">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>When, to your knowledge, did Mr Mtambo leave the ANC to join the IFP?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="944">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>It was in late 1990, although I don&#039;t remember exactly the month.  I mean in 1992, I am sorry.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="945">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Was that during the height of the violence in the area?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="946">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>No, as I have said, the height of the violence, started to be subsiding in early 1992, so by that time, it was in the course of you know, being put through, you know, ending, something like that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="947">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Do you know the reason why he resigned from the ANC to join the IFP, is that within your knowledge?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="948">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>No, I don&#039;t know by now, but maybe by speculating, if you will allow me, I can say because his uncle which he referred to earlier on, he also joined the IFP and so maybe because he lived there.  That is just speculating you know.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="949">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Maybe that is why he was also shifted, (indistinct) and joined the IFP from the ANC.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="950">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Claassen, you may proceed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="951">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>May I just ask one question to clarify something for me, Mr Claassen.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="952">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Phumayo, you stated that there was violence in 1992 and then it sort of - matters were normalised.  What brought about this normalisation, because one would expect it towards an election, to have become more intense.  Can you clarify that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="953">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, as I said the last incident that I can recall which was involving a lot of violence, it was early in 1992.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="954">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	In 1992, after that incident, that is when the things like Peace Accords and Peace Agreements were being started, and members of the different parties, were being you know, convened into the hall for some meetings, and they would be shaking hands and things like that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="955">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Therefore that was the beginning of you know, a sort of sharing maybe of the same interest, although the enmity did not end completely, but maybe that could have been the reason that could have led, because maybe some of the people there, the political leaders also frequented the area in an attempt to try to encourage the people to stop the fightings and all that, from different parties.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="956">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>May I just ask whether it is within your knowledge whether the Chairman of the IFP had attended the Peace Accord meetings at Davel?  His name was mentioned, it is just ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="957">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>Napoleon.  Napoleon Nkonza.  Yes, of course, he was present in those Peace Accords and all that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="958">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="959">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You may proceed Mr Claassen.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="960">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Madam Chair.  Mr Phumayo, if I may then although you say that there were at that stage not, it is your submission, that there were not blatant violence, is it not so that there were a very evident opposition of wills in the two different political parties in the township?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="961">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>May you please come again sir, opposition of what?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="962">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Political wills, it was evident that people were politically opposing each other?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="963">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, in the sense that the ANC differs from the IFP, the ideas, there was the difference of the ideas and all that, but in terms of maybe that starting the conflicts and things like that, there was no any stage which could have reached to that point.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="964">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Phumayo, were you aware of any animosity between the applicant and the deceased at any time preceding this time that he was killed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="965">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="966">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>You were not aware of anything?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="967">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="968">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Madam Chair, if I might just be given a moment to get an instruction from my applicant.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="969">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You may do so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="970">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="971">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Claassen?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="972">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Madam Chair, I have just one further thing.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="973">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Phumayo, is the name Kuku Twala and Sticka Similane known to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="974">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>Can you come again.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="975">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>If you will forgive my pronunciation, I believe it is Kuku Twala and Sticka Similane.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="976">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t know whether I don&#039;t get your pronunciation right, I don&#039;t think I know any name like that.  Maybe you can ask the applicant to say them to me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="977">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, just say those names Mr Mtambo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="978">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Gugu Twala and Sdicka Simelane.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="979">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, knew Sdicka, not Gugu Twala.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="980">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Pardon me Madam Chair, Mr Phumayo, is it not true and it is an instruction from my client, that Mr Sdicka Simelane was murdered or killed in that township in 1993?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="981">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>Which township?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="982">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Pardon me, I was mistaken, not dead, but he was shot in kwaDela?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="983">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>And he died?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="984">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>No, no, it is my mistake, he did not die, but he was shot.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="985">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>No, no, I didn&#039;t hear anything about that, because you know, Mr Sdicka and the other people there, who lived in Ermelo, they were IFP members, they came to our location during the turmoil stage of that period and when things started to be normal, they just went back to their relative places, so such an extent that he was only murdered where he lived in Ermelo, after he had gone back there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="986">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	He has been involved in Davel during those times, the early 1990&#039;s.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="987">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Phumayo, it is my instruction that this Sdicka was not shot and killed, but he was killed in kwaDela in 1993?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="988">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>He was shot at, not killed.  Is that what you want to say?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="989">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="990">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>No, I that is news to me, I did not hear anything about that or related to that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="991">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What are you saying Mr Claassen, are you saying that Mr Sdicka Simelane was shot at by alleged ANC supporters, because what would be the relevance of that evidence if it impinged on that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="992">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>That is indeed what I was getting at Madam Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="993">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Can you put it to him who of the alleged ANC members or supporters, allegedly shot him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="994">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>If I may just be afforded a moment Madam Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="995">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Thank you Madam Chair, Mr Phumayo, it is my instruction that this shooting incident on this Mr Sdicka was done by a man with the surname Nsiaplose, who was a prominent member of the ANC.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="996">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Claassen, won&#039;t you allow Mr Mtambo to pronounce again the surname.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="997">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Msia Blose and Jonjos Skonde, those are the names that were known.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="998">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I know those persons he has just mentioned, but there was no shooting which was related to them in any way, during that time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="999">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Do you know Msia Blose and Jonjos Skonde to be members of the ANC?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1000">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>Very well, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1001">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And how would you have been able to know whether this shooting did take place in 1993 on Sdicka Simelane?  Would it have come to your knowledge?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1002">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>No, it did not you know, come to my knowledge, as I have just said.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1003">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Is it something that ordinarily would have come to your knowledge?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1004">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>I think so, probably, because the applicant knows that and if again I can presume that he knew that during that period, then that means because there was a very close connection between the police and the IFP members, that could have been brought to light and those people could have maybe been arrested or anything like that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1005">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	That is why I am assuming that it should not have happened, because I did not hear anything about it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1006">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1007">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Madam Chair, just in conclusion, Mr Phumayo, were you present in kwaDela during this time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1008">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>During?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1009">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>During the years that you have just described?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1010">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I was present.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1011">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>From 1990 to 1993?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1012">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>Exactly, actually I grew up there and in 1993, I was doing standard 8 and the school there at kwaDela, ended in standard 8 by that time, and in 1994, I resumed my education at Middelburg in 1994 and I completed my matriculation in 1995.  That is when I came back to kwaDela again.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1013">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Those two years, 1994 and 1995, that is the time when I was not present in the area.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1014">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Madam Chair, I have no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1015">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR CLAASSEN</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1016">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Claassen, what do you say to the fact that Ms Thabete has now introduced the evidence in respect of Mr Phumayo not having been the Chairperson of the ANC Youth League, as alleged by your client and that had not been put to him, to afford him maybe a proper opportunity to comment upon it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1017">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Wouldn&#039;t you want him to comment on that aspect of the evidence which has now been introduced through the evidence of Mr Trevor Phumayo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1018">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Madam Chair, I would appreciate the opportunity, and it is also my instruction.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1019">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I will then introduce it and I  will ask Mr Mtambo from the Chair.  Mr Mtambo, Mr Trevor Phumayo has now testified that the deceased, that is Mr Mshenga Phumayo, was never at any stage, a Chairperson of the ANC Youth League.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1020">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	You are now being given this opportunity to comment on that evidence, since it impinges on the evidence that you have already led, that to your knowledge he was the Chairperson of the ANC Youth League and that he was so particularly at the time, when he was shot, being the 29th of May 1993.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1021">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I wouldn&#039;t try to argue with him on this point, but what I know is what I put before the Commission, because about his involvement and his chairmanship, I heard it from himself, when we were sitting together in a lunch and he told me he is the one who is the leader of the Youth, and I believed it because he told me that he was not the Chairperson of the Youth, I wouldn&#039;t go far to comment.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1022">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I don&#039;t have the exact details as to, from outside, as to whether he was the Chairperson or not.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1023">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You have heard the evidence of Mr Trevor Phumayo saying that one Mr Ben Nkosi was the Chairperson of the ANC Youth.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1024">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I would like to, would you please repeat the question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1025">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I will do so, in fact I was in the process of completing it and something interrupted me.  I was saying you have heard the evidence of Mr Trevor Phumayo, to the effect that Mr David Nkosi was in 1993 the Chairperson of the ANC and that in fact, he had been the Chairperson of the ANC Youth League, not only in 1993, but had been so in the many years preceding 1993.  What do you say to that evidence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1026">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I cannot deny what he is saying now, because the only thing that I know is that the person I killed, was the Chairperson of the ANC Youth League.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1027">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	He told me himself.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1028">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>When were you told by him that he was the Chair of the ANC Youth League?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1029">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>At the time when I sat with him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1030">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>When in terms of months and year, were you told by him that he was the Chair of the ANC Youth League?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1031">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>It was before his death, that is how I could explain it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1032">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>In what year was that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1033">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I can&#039;t remember the year, but if I were to estimate, it was after the death of Chris Hani, because after, it was the week after the funeral.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1034">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chris Hani died in 1992, am I correct Ms Thabete?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1035">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>1993, on the 10th of April, if I can remember, on Good Friday.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1036">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, now you were sitting in a lunch, speaking with Mr Phumayo and he divulged this information and you referred to that place as being a lunch, do I understand that to be a shibeen or a tavern?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1037">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	By a lunch, do you mean a shibeen or a tavern?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1038">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it is my uncle&#039;s place and it is a shibeen.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1039">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You were obviously having a friendly discussion at that stage?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1040">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>We were discussing the situation there, because I was very much worried about the situation at our place, and I tried to discuss this with him, since I saw him as a person who is in front and in order to get the situation in control, I thought it would be better to talk to him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1041">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>How could you have seen him as a person who was in front, because at that stage he had not told you that he was the Chair of the ANC Youth League?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1042">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>He was the one who was always in constant contact with us, the Inkatha members, so that is why we thought he was the one who was in front.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1043">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>By we, do you mean yourself, because you had been previously a member of the ANC?  Wasn&#039;t that the basis of your discussion and that is how you met?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1044">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I would like to explain before the Chairperson.  To be a member, I would say, I didn&#039;t even have a membership card, I just followed them as they were toyi-toying them knowing exactly what is happening, and where we were going.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1045">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I only got deep into politics, after I acquired full membership of the IFP.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1046">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But previously you were a supporter of the ANC?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1047">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I would like a full explanation whether by saying I was a supporter or member, do you mean a person who is just a follower or someone who is registered, a registered member of a particular organisation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1048">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Can I, I am going to curtail you because otherwise we will be here until the cows come back home.  Please just stick to what is being put to you, without giving elaborate and unnecessary answers.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1049">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	You have stated you were not a registered member of the ANC, you were merely a follower, that makes you merely a supporter.  I am sure you know that, you are from the location, you have been involved with the IFP.  That must be something that is within your knowledge.  Let us not play games.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1050">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>It is now that I understand it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1051">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, please try and understand because we do not have time to waste.  Now you previously were a supporter of the ANC?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1052">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1053">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And you know that David Nkosi, during the time that you were a supporter of the ANC, was the Chairperson of the ANC Youth League?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1054">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I didn&#039;t know that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1055">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Why did you not know that?  You followed them around and did whatever they did?  Under what were you doing that if you didn&#039;t know who was the Chair of the ANC Youth League?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1056">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I was never told that there was a Chairperson by the name of David Nkosi, and I never knew that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1057">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>During the time that you were merely supporting, who did you think was the Chairperson of the ANC Youth League?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1058">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I only knew that Mr Mashinini is an ANC leader, nothing else.  That there was any Youth League Chairperson, I didn&#039;t know that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1059">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>If that is so, how did you then become aware that Mr Phumayo is the Chairperson of the Youth League?  You don&#039;t know all along during the time you are a supporter of an organisation, and you are no longer a supporter of an organisation, you suddenly know that somebody is called Chairperson of a Youth League?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1060">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Did you know that a Youth League existed within the ANC when you were a supporter thereof?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1061">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I knew, I heard that there was a Youth League, but I couldn&#039;t differentiate what it was, I just regarded myself as an ANC supporter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1062">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You are unable to deny that David Nkosi was the Chairperson of the ANC Youth League in 1993?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1063">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t know that David Nkosi was the Chairperson.  That is the truth.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1064">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You are unable to deny that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1065">
			<speaker>MR MTAMBO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I can&#039;t.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1066">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Mr Claassen, have we covered every ground in respect to that piece of evidence that was not initially put to your client, when it should have been put to him by Ms Thabete?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1067">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>I believe so Madam Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1068">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, I believe so as well.  Ms Thabete, do you have any re-examination to do on Mr Phumayo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1069">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>Just one aspect Madam Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1070">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Emanating from the cross-examination of Mr Claassen only?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1071">
			<speaker>RE-EXAMINATION BY MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  When you say that, Mr Phumayo, when you say that the deceased was toyi-toying at some period, what period are you talking about?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1072">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Can I refresh your memory, he has stated that that means during his duration as a member of the ANC, at various times.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1073">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>I wanted to clarify that exactly.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1074">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I think it has been clarified.  You may proceed to respond.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1075">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>I can say, as I have already explicated that he also took part in toyi-toying when we were having meetings in the hall, I mean chanting and all that, even during 1993, yes, he did take part during that year, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1076">
			<speaker>MS THABETE</speaker>
			<text>No further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1077">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MS THABETE</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1078">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Mr Phumayo, you may return to your seat, thank you for the evidence that you have given before us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1079">
			<speaker>MR PHUMAYO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you very much Madam Chair, we very much appreciate your work, we hope that it will indeed achieve the aims of the Act.  Thank you very much.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1080">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>We value your support, thank you very much.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1081">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1082">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Claassen, are you in a position to address us?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1083">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Madam Chair, I think it is true that this application took most of the day.  If I could be afforded just an opportunity to recap on some of the things, some of the notes I have made, Madam Chair, I am not sure, I notice that it is already twenty past four, if it would in any way be possible, I don&#039;t know if the Committee would afford me just a few minutes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1084">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, we would prefer to afford you a few minutes, if you can give an indication of how few those minutes will be, we would like to conclude argument in this matter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1085">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	We already are running far behind with our schedule, we were supposed to have concluded another matter by the end of the day, so we would really urge you that you take as few minutes as reasonably can be, so that we can conclude your argument today.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1086">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>I would appreciate it Madam Chair, ten minutes would be more than sufficient.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1087">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>We do not want to get the wroth of the Department of Correctional Services, we from the bench feel that there is really no need for Mr Mtambo to be present while you do your address.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1088">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	He can go back to prison, unless you feel otherwise and you are free to address us on any issue that would make us change our attitude towards him going back to prison, whilst you proceed with your address.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1089">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Madam Chair, I fully understand the position of Correctional Services, and I believe, I can convey the, I will be in contact with my client in due course, so I can&#039;t see any necessity of him having to be here.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1090">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And if you can just explain to Mr Mtambo, that this is part of the process that you have to go through, to enable us to come to a just and equitable decision in respect of his application, and that as soon as we have done so, which hopefully should not be later than tomorrow, you will then immediately convey the decision of this Committee to him without delay.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1091">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Our office also has an obligation to communicate our decision to Mr Mtambo without delay, but I am sure he would appreciate you undertaking to do so as well.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1092">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>I would do so Madam Chair, if I could just be afforded a second.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1093">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>We will adjourn for about how many minutes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1094">
			<speaker>MR CLAASSEN</speaker>
			<text>Ten minutes Madam Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1095">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>We will adjourn for ten minutes, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1096">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>