<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY HEARINGS</type>
	<startdate>1999-05-11</startdate>
	<location>PRETORIA</location>
	<day>6</day>
	<names>ERIC GOOSEN</names>
	<case>AM 4158</case>
						<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=53328&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/1999/99050313_pre_990511pt.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="53">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>ON RESUMPTION</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>MR ALBERTS</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairman, the following applicant is Mr Goosen.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker>ERIC GOOSEN</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>MR MALAN</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, you may sit down.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MR ALBERTS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Goosen, your application for amnesty is contained in Bundle 2 before the Committee and the introductory part is from page 295 to page 336, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker>MR GOOSEN</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker>MR ALBERTS</speaker>
			<text>Do you confirm the correctness of the contents?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>MR GOOSEN</speaker>
			<text>I confirm that, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>MR ALBERTS</speaker>
			<text>This particular incident, it goes from page 383 to page 390?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>MR GOOSEN</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>MR ALBERTS</speaker>
			<text>Do you also confirm subject to the evidence that you will give shortly, in general terms, the correctness of those pages?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>MR GOOSEN</speaker>
			<text>I confirm it, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker>MR ALBERTS</speaker>
			<text>And then lastly, the relevant pages to complete the picture, are from page 489 onwards, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>MR GOOSEN</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker>MR ALBERTS</speaker>
			<text>Do you also confirm the correctness of the contents of those pages?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>MR GOOSEN</speaker>
			<text>I confirm it Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>MR ALBERTS</speaker>
			<text>On page 383 the date January to April 1986 as being the relevant dates concerning this incident.  Do you still stand by that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker>MR GOOSEN</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson no, I heard today that the precise date of this incident was February 1987.  At the time of the compiling of my initial application, I could remember that it was at the start of a year and I also remembered that in 1986, at the beginning of the year, I was on an explosives course and I made the deduction that it must have been before my explosives course, but in fact it was the start of 1987 and not 1986 as indicated in my application.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>MR ALBERTS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Goosen, on the next page, 384 the account starts of relevant happenings.  You also heard Mr Momberg&#039;s evidence and broadly speaking, do you agree and more in particular, do you agree with the account as set out in your own application?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>MR GOOSEN</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>MR ALBERTS</speaker>
			<text>Is there anything that Mr Momberg said about the incident with which you pertinently do not agree?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>MR GOOSEN</speaker>
			<text>I agree wholeheartedly with Lieutenant Momberg&#039;s version.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>MR ALBERTS</speaker>
			<text>Right.  And is that also the case concerning the victim of this incident?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker>MR GOOSEN</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.  During consultation, a few days ago, in preparation in the cross-questioning of Hechter and Van Vuuren surrounding the kidnapping of Morudi, there in an answer it came through that the kidnapping took place three months after his house had been attacked and in that same evidence, he also mentioned his niece who had been killed in that attack.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>MR ALBERTS</speaker>
			<text>Is that the first knowledge that you had concerning the fact that contrary to what you said in your application, that there was in fact a victim and in fact somebody who had been killed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker>MR GOOSEN</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker>MR ALBERTS</speaker>
			<text>Now you have already expressed your sentiments during the previous application concerning the unfortunate consequences that this type of operation held.  Do you stand by that too for the present purposes or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker>MR GOOSEN</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, in this specific situation and as in the previous one, can I just express myself by expressing my deep regret in the absence of the Morudi family.  I would like to tell them in person and I can just ask them to try and forgive me for my part that I had in this incident and to make it easier for me to live my conscience.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>MR ALBERTS</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Goosen.  Thank you Mr Chairman, I have no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR ALBERTS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>May I proceed Mr Chairman, thank you.  Mr Goosen, the information that you had with regard to Morudi and the people that would have been in the house that night, do you agree with Mr Momberg&#039;s evidence as far as that is concerned, the question that I asked him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker>MR GOOSEN</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, I agree.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>In other words your impression was that there would be nobody at home?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>MR GOOSEN</speaker>
			<text>That is in fact so, that is what we understood from Lieutenant Hechter, and feedback that he got from Mamasela who was involved in the gathering of information.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Do I understand you correctly, your evidence is that at the time of the bomb attack, the bomb attack took place before the questioning of Morudi after which he later became an informer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker>MR GOOSEN</speaker>
			<text>I did not know that there would be a kidnapping and a questioning, but from information and documents available now, I know now that this incident took place and then three months elapsed whereafter Scheepers Morudi was recruited.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>So the bomb attack took place, I think we are reasonably sure about this now, three months elapsed more or less and then he was questioned and Captain Hechter and Paul van Vuuren gave evidence and have already received amnesty and during that questioning, he agreed that during interrogation, he agreed to become an informer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>MR GOOSEN</speaker>
			<text>In the structures in which I served hereafter in Security, I was aware that Scheepers Morudi became an informer and he was a registered informer up until 1992, even of the Intelligence Unit of which I was part.  I wasn&#039;t necessarily his handler, but the Intelligence Unit which operated in the Security Branch until 1992, he was a registered informer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>You were not involved in the interrogation, it was Van Vuuren, Hechter and Bokaba, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker>MR GOOSEN</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairman, I have no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR DU PLESSIS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker>MR NIEMAN</speaker>
			<text>I have no questions Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR NIEMAN</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker>ADV STEENKAMP</speaker>
			<text>No questions, thank you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO CROSS-EXAMINATION BY ADV STEENKAMP</text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker>MR ALBERTS</speaker>
			<text>No-re-examination, thank you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO RE-EXAMINATION BY MR ALBERTS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, now I find myself in a predicament, because I phoned Captain Hechter just when we started and I indicated to him that he should be here as soon as possible, but he lives in the eastern parts of Pretoria, we went out just now to phone him and he said he was on his way.  I didn&#039;t think this evidence was going to be as quick as this.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Do you want a short adjournment?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Please Mr Chairman, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>