<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION, AMNESTY HEARING</type>
	<startdate>1999-05-03</startdate>
	<location>JOHANNESBURG</location>
	<day>1</day>
	<names>HELD AT : JOHANNESBURG, JAN CAREL COETZEE</names>
	<case>AM4120/96</case>
	<matter>COSAS FOUR</matter>
					<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=53336&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/1999/99050321_jhb_990503jh.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="423">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>This is a sitting of the Amnesty Committee at the Central Methodist Church, Johannesburg.  The panel is chaired by myself, Denzil Potgieter.  I am assisted by Adv  de Jager and Adv Gcabashe.  We will be hearing the Amnesty Applications of  J C Coetzee, Amnesty Reference AM4210/96, A Grobbelaar Amnesty Reference AM4143/96, W.F. Schoon Amnesty Reference AM 4396/96 and E.T. Mfalapitsa Amnesty Reference AM3592/96A  I am going to ask the parties to put themselves on record.  Adv Visser, would you start off.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes thank you Mr Visser.  Mr Knight, or is it Adv Jansen.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairman.  Adv Jansen on instructions of Julian Knight Attorneys.  We act for Mr Mfalapitsa in the initial hearing relating to the Cosas Members.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>5011/97</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Ek is L van der Walt.  Ek verskyn saam met Adv H.J. Prinsloo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Goed, dankie Adv van der Walt.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>For the victim.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>MR TSHABALALA:</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairman.  My name is Tshabalala, initials T.Z.  I am for the victims Mr Musi and the other family, Madikela family, Madagwane and Thlapo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Is it on behalf of Mr Musi and the next of kin of the other three deceased?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker>MR TSHABALALA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Tshabalala.  Ms Thabethe.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker>MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>I am Ms Thabethe, the evidence leader for the TRC.  Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, thank you Mr Jansen.  Yes, I assume that if there were any difficulty in regard to the arrangement concerning the presence of Mr Mfalapitsa, the other parties would raise it.  I assume that there is no problem with that.  Under those circumstances we would proceed in the temporary absence of Mr Mfalapitsa, who will join us as soon as he is available.  We have also noted the issue around the affidavit, Mr Jansen.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN:</speaker>
			<text>I believe that is taking place already.  The witness protection people have gone to fetch him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>MR TSHABALALA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes I think Mr Jansen is furnishing one to you now.  And for the Evidence Leader as well.  I assume the other parties are in possession of it.  Very well.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, we are aware that the Amnesty Committees, before which we have appeared in the past, have appreciated all efforts that we could make in  order to facilitate matters and to expedite matters.  In the past, Mr Chairperson, and this is the first time I am appearing before you, in the past what we have done was for every witness in every application to have prepared a fairly extensive document which included background of the applicant, the political background, the conflict of the past and matters related thereto.  We have discovered, Chairperson, that much of that has by passage of time, become common cause.  We all know of the conflict of the past and we have all now heard, including you I am certain Mr Chairperson, of what the position of the security force members was during those times.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, thank you Mr Visser.  I have no objection to my receiving this as &quot;Exhibit A&quot;.  It will then be &quot;Exhibit A&quot;, the document headed &#039;Algemene Agtergrond tot Amnestie Aansoeke&#039;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Chairperson, we then go on at page 2, dealing with the background and experiences of policemen.  Here we are in the fortunate position that in the Amnesty Decision of the original Amnesty Committee at page 2, most of what we have argued before under this heading has been summarised and we give you the summary where the Amnesty Committee said, at page 2 &quot;almost all policemen giving evidence before us etc. etc&quot; and we will all rely on that passage to page three.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Chairperson, the typical experience of members of the police during the conflict of the past is set out from paragraph 8 onwards, it speaks for itself.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Chairperson, it goes on up to page 10 where we deal very concisely with the conflict of the past, the four pillars of the struggle and we give certain extracts of quotations, which we believe you will find helpful and which we believe are relevant to this issue.  One of the quotations is fairly long and it deals with how the communistic danger was viewed, as expressed by Mr Adriaan Vlok.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Chairperson, at the bottom of page 15 we dealt with the role which was played by the neighbouring countries around South Africa and the influence that that had on the conflict of the past from the point of view of the security forces and we deal in turn with Botswana, Swaziland and Lesotho.  In Swaziland also there is included Mozambique.  	</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Chairperson now if I may, just on the question of these topics, say that of course there is far more evidence available regarding activities in our neighbouring countries during the conflict of the past than what we have placed before you.  It was not intended that what you should get now before you to be exhaustive.  For example, Commissioner de Jager will confirm that in the last hearings which we had in April there were incidents concerned with infiltration and weapon smuggling from Botswana in which we handed in documentation of voluminous format.  When we realised that we were again going to talk about Botswana before you today, Chairperson, we just felt that it is just too unreasonable to expect that those documents be reproduced every time and what we have done is, therefore, given you a very brief synopsis.  We believe Chairperson that most of this is also common cause.  We know that the neighbouring countries were used as springboards and we know that the South African Police had no jurisdiction to act against activists in those countries.  That is the reason also why there are applicants before you applying for amnesty in regard to what they did across the borders in our neighbouring countries.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Chairperson, we briefly deal at page 20 with the importance of information.  The reason for that is that in many applications one finds that applicants will tell you that the acts, omission or offence which they committed had to do with the protection of identity, identities rather, of informers and it speaks for itself.  Many applicants have told the Amnesty Committee that without information they were not able to effectively resist the revolutionary attack.  We just made a few points for consideration under that last heading.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Chairperson, thank you for having listened to me.  We hope that this may facilitate matters.  The applicants will simply refer to that document, Exhibit A, insofar as it is applicable to them. </text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>can change it, its not a problem.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker>JAN CAREL COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Mr Coetzee, I am going to address you as Mr Coetzee.  Your rank, or the last rank that you had was Lieutenant Colonel.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE:</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>You apply for amnesty for an incident where four Cosas members were involved close to Krugersdorp and in which three of them were killed and one of them was injured.  Is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE:</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Your Amnesty Application appears in bundle one, on page 202, Chairperson.  Have you gone through the Amnesty Application on page 202 and are you satisfied that it is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I have gone through it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And except for some elaborations and aspects which we will point out, do you confirm the correctness of it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And in paragraph 7(a) there is a question which leads  &quot;if you were a member or office bearer or supporter of any political organisation, please mention the name&quot; and on your form the letters not applicable appear, is that correct, or is that wrong?  Were you a supporter of a political party?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Which party?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="61">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>National Party.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="62">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And you were a supporter?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="63">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="64">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR VISSER:   If we go to Exhibit B you asked the Committee to incorporate the contents of Exhibit A into you evidence, is that correct?  Are there any aspects in Exhibit A which are not applicable to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="65">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, the whole document is applicable to me and also the evidence which is referred to in Exhibit A.  That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="66">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="67">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Page 2 at paragraph 2.  Can you just start there and tell us what your role was and what the background was to this incident?  May I just put it to you by introduction that, is it correct that in February 1992 you were the newly appointed commander of Vlakplaas?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="68">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="69">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Operational Commander, Chairperson.  And one of the first tasks you performed was to move with the  Askaris in the vicinity of Soweto and the surrounding areas where you attempted to identify terrorists.  Is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="70">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="71">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And once again, just by way of introduction, the manner in which you acted, can you</text>
		</line>
		<line number="72">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>tell the Committee briefly how the Askaris acted in order to perform this task.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="73">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, the Askaris and the black members of the force traveled in different vehicles in these areas specifically  taxi ranks, railway stations etc. and the white members were stationed at other places in our own vehicles and in radio contact with them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="74">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And if they had noted anyone and they wanted to execute an arrest, what would be the position?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="75">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>If it was possible, Chairperson, they would call us and we would assist them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="76">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, and was it true that because black members of the police were there they could execute arrests?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="77">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="78">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Very well.  And in your Amnesty application Mr Coetzee, there is a  reference to Joe Mamasela and Mfalapitsa.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="79">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="80">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Who were they at that stage in February 1992.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="81">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>They formed part of that specific group at that stage in that area, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="82">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Were they members of the police or the Askaris?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="83">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="84">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Just give us some background to Mr Mfalapitsa, but you mention this on page 3 paragraph 4.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="85">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, Mfalapitsa was earlier an ANC terrorist who received military training in Eastern Europe and after he returned to South Africa he handed himself over to the security forces and became a member of my unit at Vlakplaas.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="86">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And that would be as an Askari?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="87">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="88">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Continue please.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="89">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mfalapitsa was back in the country and this was not generally known to the public and to the people who knew him and this was advantageous from the viewpoint as to the role which he could play at the security branch, in other words he could act anonymously.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="90">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>People thought that he was still a supporter of the ANC?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="91">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="92">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>At the start of paragraph 6 the story begins with how this incident took place.  Can you please mention in to the Committee.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="93">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="94">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>May I just interrupt you here? Will you please just go a little slower to allow the interpretation to take place.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="95">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="96">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson.  I agree and comprehend.  Would you just stick to the document and if you want to add anything there, please tell us so, but please stick to the document.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="97">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	You had spoken of W/O Nkosi whom they wanted to kill.  Is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="98">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="99">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Where was he stationed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="100">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>He was stationed at Security Branch, Krugersdorp.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="101">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And what was the request from Musi according to your report, with the request to Mfalapitsa?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="102">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>It was in the last sentence of paragraph 6.  His request was that Mfalapitsa had to train them in weaponry and that he had to supply them with weapons.  Do I continue?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="103">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes please.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="104">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>This was a time of large scale violence directed at police officers and Black Council members which included the burning down of houses and several murders of members and their family members.  My attention was drawn to the fact that Mfalapitsa had applied for Amnesty and that he has also spoken of the plans of the group to kill one Matsibitso who was a teacher and member of the Council.  I cannot recall it but I would accept that it was so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="105">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson it really starts at page 237 at the bottom and it runs over the page, where you will find that evidence.  Please continue with  paragraph 9 on page 4.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="106">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>I then decided to discuss the problem with Brig Willem Schoon, the Commander of C Unit at</text>
		</line>
		<line number="107">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Headquarters.  I gave him the information and I explained the problem to him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="108">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Can you just pause here.  For the members who do not know Brig Willem Schoon was the overall Commander of Vlakplaas, was that not so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="109">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="110">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And that is the reason why you went to him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="111">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he was my immediate Commander.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="112">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>He was your Commander?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="113">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="114">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Please continue. Paragraph 10.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="115">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="116" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="117">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	If Mfalapitsa could not be used as a state witness they would be found guilty of illegal possession of weapons, ammunition and explosives.  This offence was not so serious that it would be sure that they would be removed from the community for a long time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="118">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>You mean that they would not be sent to jail for a long time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="119">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="120">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	There was also the danger that if they were to be charged with a crime, they could mention or name Mfalapitsa as the person whom they received the weapons from and this would necessarily lead to the exposure of the fact that he was an Askari.  I then suggested that there was just one option and this was to kill them.  I suggested that weapons and/or explosive devices be given to them and that I find a suitable place at some mine where this instruction would take place and that an explosion be orchestrated which would point to the fact that they had blown themselves up.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="121">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Brig Schoon undertook to receive instructions to this and that he would inform me at a later stage.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="122">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Brig Schoon contacted me later and informed me that the  matter would be considered properly to eliminate these youths and he gave me the authorisation to continue with my plan.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="123">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I have said in my Amnesty Application, as I have understood this instruction it was correct because this pointed to the safeguarding of a police officer and his family.  By that I did not mean to give notice that I acted legally, justified would be a better word to use.  I was aware that this action would be a crime and is an irregular action and in co-operation with an explosives expert from the SAP at that stage, it was Lieut C Rorich, explosives were placed in the room where the training of these youths would take place.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="124">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>If I could just interrupt you there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="125">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	On page 203 of your Amnesty Application you referred to the date as 15 February.  How do you know that this is the date, 15 February 1982?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="126">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>I cannot recall the date, Chairperson.  This incident took place 17 years ago.  I read the date in the newspaper.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="127">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Would you please continue with paragraph 20 on page 7.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="128">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Joe Mamasela transported the youths and Mfalapitsa to this house where the explosives were.  There were two or three F1 Russian hand grenades which I had found at Vlakplaas and these I gave to Mfalapitsa to hand to Cosas members.  There could have been a pistol.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="129">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>You refer to the pistol.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="130">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Once again because in newspaper reports a pistol was mentioned.  That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="131">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Please continue.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="132">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>These Cosas members and Mfalapitsa were in the room busy with their training in weapons and at some stage Mfalapitsa came outside and Lieut Rorich executed the explosion while Col Grobbelaar and I and one of his staff members observed the premises and after the explosion we left the scene immediately.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="133">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>To prevent any identification, the member to which you refer was not identified here, who is it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="134">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>It was W/O van Tonder, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="135">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, we refer to paragraph 22, and where is Mr van Toner today?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="136">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>He has died in a motor vehicle accident.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="137">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Very well, continue.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="138">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>And after the explosion we immediately left the scene to prevent any identification.  It seemed later that the three youths, B Madikela, N Matabane and S Mohlapo were killed in this explosion and that Sandile Musi was injured.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="139">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Mr Coetzee, where did you get these names from?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="140">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Once again from a report, but the name of Musi I can remember.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="141">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	The act, this was to the instructions of members of security branch at headquarters and the following day I reported to Brig Schoon that the incident had been concluded and that three of the Cosas members had been killed and one had escaped, but it has to be that one had survived, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="142">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Post mortem inquests were carried out, normal inquests were carried out by the other branches of the force and as it appears in 1P47 later, I request that my amnesty be granted to me for my role in this tragic event on the grounds of the considerations as it is put here and in the general background document.  I want to emphasise that my action took place during the struggle of the past, that it was aimed at the supporters of the liberation struggle in the safeguarding and maintenance of the previous government and that I bona fide believed that my action was part of my task as a police officer and in the execution of my tasks as a police officer and request that amnesty be granted to me for my actions in this incident.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="143">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR VISSER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="144">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="145">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Mr Coetzee, Mr Rorich who is my client, his Amnesty Application is filed under Annexure A and these applications were not bound in a bundle.  I want to know if you have seen this application.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="146">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>No I have not, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="147">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="148">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="149">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Why did you approach him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="150">
			<speaker>MR  COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>The first reason was because I trusted him.  The second reason was because I did not have the means to cause an explosion and I was aware of the fact that he could.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="151">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Is it correct that he is an explosives expert?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="152">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="153">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>And is it correct, because in his application in Annexure A9 he was not tasked with the investigation to these youths, the only purpose for which you approached him was to execute this explosion?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="154">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="155">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>You also mention in paragraph 23 and it was put to you where you got these names from and you said it was from a newspaper report, I would like to put it to you  that Mr Rorich has only taken note of the names now in your application.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="156">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	No further questions, Chairperson, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="157">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, thank you Ms van der Walt.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="158">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Adv Jansen.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="159">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="160">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Mr Coetzee just a few aspects which I want you to confirm as to the practice of Vlakplaas.  Is it so that the members of Vlakplaas, when they undertook this identification of insurgents of the ANC, did they work in groups?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="161">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="162">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>And these groups were to some extent territorial in the sense that some of them worked in the Eastern Transvaal, some of them in the Western Transvaal, depending on where they had knowledge of the area.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="163">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="164">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>And it was logical that a person like Mr Mfalapitsa who knew Botswana, would be deployed to a group who worked in Western Transvaal and on the West Rand?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="165">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="166">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>I would assume that, except for the work of this person so as to identify a person who would be an insurgent from Botswana to South Africa, this was also part, to identify people who wanted to go out for training abroad who were supporters of the ANC or were otherwise actively involved in ANC activities.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="167">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="168">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="169">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="170">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>I would like to take it up with you.  Can you recall where this discussion took place?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="171">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>No I cannot.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="172">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>No further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="173">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR JANSEN</text>
		</line>
		<line number="174">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Tshabalala?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="175">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR TSHABALALA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="176">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Coetzee, when Mfalapitsa reported to you the Cosas wanted to go ahead with their plan, did you have any alternative plan?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="177">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>My alternative plan was to eliminate them, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="178">
			<speaker>MR TSHABALALA</speaker>
			<text>You mentioned that you took into account the family and the life of W/O Nkosi in taking out the instructions that the deceased should be eliminated.  Did you ever think about the deceased and their families at the time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="179">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR COETZEE:   I did and this matter weighed very heavily upon me and today, with great humility, I would like to express my sincere sympathy to the next of kin of the victims because this is not something that I would have wanted.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="180">
			<speaker>MR TSHABALALA</speaker>
			<text>I take it that the security laws at the time were tough and efficient for the State.  It provided wide powers for the security police at the time to keep people in custody.  Was it not possible for yourself to use these powers provided by the law?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="181">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="182">
			<speaker>MR TSHABALALA</speaker>
			<text>Well, I would like you to elaborate.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="183">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="184">
			<speaker>MR TSHABALALA</speaker>
			<text>Did you ever think that he would be exposed at any time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="185">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="186">
			<speaker>MR TSHABALALA</speaker>
			<text>At the time did you think that eliminating the deceased, was it proportional to your duties at the time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="187">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>At that stage as a result of the terrible conditions under which this country was, I felt that it was justifiable.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="188">
			<speaker>MR TSHABALALA</speaker>
			<text>Will you still think the same today?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="189">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="190">
			<speaker>MR TSHABALALA</speaker>
			<text>Did you ever find out whether you were dealing with highly politically matured persons or with youths who were caught in the political situation at the time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="191">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, at that stage the youth, especially from 16 June 1976 when the RSA  started burning, the youth especially was used effectively by the ANC  SACP Alliance by means of various organisations namely the U D F, Cosas, the Civics, the Defence Units and so forth.  They were used to promote the objectives of the ANC, to topple the government of the day by means of violence and to create chaos in the country, with the effect that the security forces would then not be able to execute their duties and that would render the country ungovernable.  I could carry on.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="192">
			<speaker>MR TSHABALALA</speaker>
			<text>This is probably what made you to want to convince Mfalapitsa to convince again the deceased not to go ahead with their plan.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="193">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="194">
			<speaker>MR TSHABALALA</speaker>
			<text>Yet you knew that these people are being used by the liberation movement.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="195">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="196">
			<speaker>MR TSHABALALA</speaker>
			<text>What was the response of your superiors after you carried out your plan?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="197">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, do you mean superiors such as Brig Schoon or somebody else?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="198">
			<speaker>MR TSHABLALA</speaker>
			<text>The top of the security forces or whoever you are reporting to.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="199">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="200">
			<speaker>MR TSHABALALA</speaker>
			<text>What remuneration did you get for executing the plans.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="201">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Absolutely nothing.  Zero.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="202">
			<speaker>MR TSHABALALA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="203">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, for several years I was stationed at Krugersdorp in the security branch before 1982 and thereafter once again and I was up to date with the circumstances of the Musi family.  I was aware of the fact that two brothers namely Benjamin and Wellington had left the country and underwent military training abroad.  At Krugersdorp there were files of these persons for illegal</text>
		</line>
		<line number="204">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>defection and terrorist training, there were files about them which I studied and, in other words, I was completely aware of their circumstances.  It was not strange to me, and I knew that there were other brothers at that house because now and then we would visit the premises in order to determine whether or not these persons had returned home.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="205">
			<speaker>MR TSHABALALA</speaker>
			<text>I put it to you that the youth and including Zandisile Musi, were not planning to kill W/O Nkosi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="206">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="207">
			<speaker>MR TSHABALALA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="208">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Tshabalala.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="209">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR TSHABALALA</text>
		</line>
		<line number="210">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Tshabalala.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="211">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Ms Thabethe.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="212">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chair, just one aspect.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="213">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="214">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Let me put it as follows:  It does not matter which decision I would have taken in this regard, the decision which was conveyed to me from Head office by Brig Schoon, was the decision that I would have stuck by.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="215">
			<speaker>MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="216">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="217">
			<speaker>MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>Okay, I have no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="218">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MS THABETHE</text>
		</line>
		<line number="219">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Ms Thabethe</text>
		</line>
		<line number="220">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Coetzee, is it correct to say that you are the person who proposed the plan.  You were the source of the idea to kill these persons.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="221">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="222">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What information did you have surrounding</text>
		</line>
		<line number="223">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>the persons against whom action had to be taken?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="224">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="225">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So in your work situation you have never dealt with any one of the deceased or the survivor?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="226">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>I had absolutely nothing to do with the three deceased.   As I have mentioned, there were times that I went to the house of this Musi and I recall that I saw him there and understood that he was one of the children of that home.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="227">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But you had no reason to pay any attention to him within the context of your duties as a security police officer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="228">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>No, not at that stage.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="229">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What did Mfalapitsa tell you with regard to these four persons?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="230">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>He said that these four persons, or at least firstly Musi, approached him alone.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="231">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="232">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="233">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And what else did he say?  He mentioned that they were youths.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="234">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Yes he said they were youths and that they had certain objectives as a group, certain actions that they were going to execute.  However, that they were not sufficiently trained to execute this alone and that they did not have suitable weaponry to do so.  They were aware of the fact that Mfalapitsa was a trained ANC terrorist and they wanted him to help them with their plans.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="235">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="236">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="237">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="238">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="239">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, so in other words there was always the possibility of petrol bombs but what they had in mind and what they held by was for Mfalapitsa to train them and to provide weaponry for them to execute this plan.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="240">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="241">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>According to the information which you received, did these persons have any political profile?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="242">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Not that I knew of.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="243">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Would it be correct to say that you were motivated basically by your concerns regarding the safety of Nkosi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="244">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson.  I might just mention to you that this specific Nkosi was a man with whom I had worked for several years.  He was a highly respected figure in the community.  He was the best black security member in Krugersdorp.  I knew him very well personally as well as his family and that year had been the first occasion upon which black members had been allocated a housing subsidy.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="245">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>He built a beautiful brick house for himself in Kagiso and I could really not see why I should sit still and watch this man and his family be murdered and see his home torched and so forth.  It weighed very heavily upon me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="246">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, but do I understand you correctly that this was the basic consideration which you held for your actions, the protection of Nkosi and his family?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="247">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="248">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Was there no other way in which you could protect Nkosi and his family except for the killing of these four youths.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="249">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson.  I know it sounds very strange to say that one murder is committed in order to prevent another.  I understand that many people struggle to accept this, but unfortunately that was the genuine state of play.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="250">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did you consider anything else?  Did you try to think of other plans or ways in which you could protect Nkosi and his family, placing guards or removing them from that residential area?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="251">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>I warned Nkosi, I told him that I had information that these guys wanted to get him.  I told him to be careful.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="252">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But did you still deem it necessary to kill the deceased?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="253">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that was my reasoning.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="254">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Very well.  Has the panel got any other questions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="255">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>You approached Rorich to offer assistance.  What rank did you have and what rank did he have?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="256">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>At that stage I was a Captain and I am not certain whether or not he was a Warrant Officer or a lieutenant.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="257">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>But you occupied a higher rank than he did?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="258">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="259">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>And if you requested or gave him orders, was he to obey you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="260">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, under normal circumstances, but this was not a legal order.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="261">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Yes I understand that but under normal circumstances with normal commands or orders,</text>
		</line>
		<line number="262">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>He would have to obey you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="263">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="264">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="265">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>It would be appropriate for his Commander to be informed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="266">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text>Did you do that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="267">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>I did not.  I did not contact his Commander or any other person with regard to this matter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="268">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text>Therefore did he come and assist you where his own command structure did not know about the task on hand?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="269">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, because the order came from Brig. Schoon who was the overall Commander of the security office.  There is an old saying which says that the less you know about something, the better for you.  So in other words there were no wide discussions about these matters with every Tom, Dick and Harry.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="270">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text>Did you tell him that Brig Schoon had authorised this particular operation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="271">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>I did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="272">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text>And you explained to him that this involved the killing of certain people?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="273">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="274">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="275">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Can I come to Brig Schoon.  Do you know who he got his orders from?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="276">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="277">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text>And was it not your business to find out either?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="278">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Not at all.  We also had a restriction of work.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="279">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text>Did he question you on your recommendation that these four youths were dangerous, just to summarise the whole matter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="280">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="281">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="282">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="283">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="284">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="285">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text>Can you recall how long it was before Mfalapitsa came out of the mine area, when he came back, time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="286">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="287">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text>As I understand the general evidence, as soon as he came out the idea was that the explosives would then be detonated?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="288">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct and Rorich was the person who could see Mfalapitsa, not me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="289">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text>Then one last aspect.  You say in paragraph 23 of I think this is Exhibit B, your statement, that it later turned out that these particular youths, three had died and one had been injured.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="290">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="291">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text>How much later was that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="292">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>The following day.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="293">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="294">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Not at all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="295">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text>Were those policemen instructed by you at all to go to this particular scene?  Just explain those circumstances as far as you know of those.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="296">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, regarding that matter, the local police handled it as they would have handled any regular explosion and any other unnatural death and so forth.  With regard to that matter, my group and I had nothing to do with it.  The cover was that these people had blown themselves up in other words. I hope you understand.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="297">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="298">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="299">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You did not notify them?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="300">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="301">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>And a previous question you were asked, how long after they arrived there did Mamasela come out of the house.  Did you hear the explosion?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="302">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="303">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>How long after their arrival did the explosion take place?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="304">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="305">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="306">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="307">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text>One final aspect.  Mfalapitsa had known the Musi brothers previously.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="308">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="309">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text>He knew the family?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="310">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>He went to school with them as far as I understood.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="311">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="312">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>particular incident?  I am simply asking whether you considered that at all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="313">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="314">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>this to me so I could not have known about something like that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="315">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Adv Visser, re-examination?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="316">
			<speaker>RE-EXAMINATION BY MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>One aspect, Chairperson.  Your leave, I think it has been dealt with but just one aspect.  You have told the Committee that youths were applied by the ANC  SACP Alliance in order to promote their interests in the struggle.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="317">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="318">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="319">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>I could not regard it as such.  Nkosi could have been killed in many other ways.  He could have been stabbed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="320">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And you referred to the use of petrol bombs.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="321">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="322">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Was that a generally common thing which appeared or was it not as regular?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="323">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>It was a very common occurrence, almost on a daily basis.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="324">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And with regard to the political aspect Mr Coetzee, which political sentiments do you think these persons held?  Of which groups or parties were they members or supporters?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="325">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>I have no doubt that the entire Musi family were either supporters of or members of the</text>
		</line>
		<line number="326">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>ANC and I can motivate why I make that statement.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="327">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="328">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	With Cosas, an organisation which was affiliated with a political organisation or party, you will know that Cosas was an affiliate of the UDF and that the UDF  was the internal wing of the ANC and one could continue as such.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="329">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Is that the reason why you say that your action was committed against supporters of the liberation movement?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="330">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="331">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="332">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes Adv Gcabashe.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="333">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text>There is just one aspect I forgot, one question I forgot to ask.  The R1 000 that was paid to Mfalapitsa, what was the purpose of paying that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="334">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, it was the policy of the government and/or the security Head office to reward black, and I emphasise the word black, members for actions that would be with the identification or arrests of insurgents and so forth.  White members never received any reward in this relation according to my recollection, the reason for that being that blood is thicker than water and the rewards were offered in order to secure the loyalty of these persons towards us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="335">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text>Would you then say, just your own opinion, that the fact that he knew that he would get this money, I mean it was general practice in the security forces, the fact that he knew he would get this money would not have motivated him to put particular things in a particular way.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="336">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="337">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="338">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I know that you will probably want to take an adjournment but the last question has now prompted re-examination on that issue.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="339">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I suspected that Mr Visser but before you do that I also have, just in that regard, a question or two and you might want to take them all together.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="340">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Would the black members who were working for you all have been aware that they were established members of this unit?  Would they all have been aware of this policy of rewards for actions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="341">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>I believe so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="342">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So to be specific, Mamasela, was he at that stage an established member of the units?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="343">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I speak under correction but I would believe that on 27 February Mamasela was sworn in as a full member of the security police and that he was affiliated to Vlakplaas on a full time basis thereafter.  It was a few days before the incident.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="344">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You are speaking of being formally sworn in, but did he work at Vlakplaas?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="345">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="346">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>For a time before this incident?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="347">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="348">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Would he have been aware of this police or rewarding black members?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="349">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="350">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But would it be reasonable to say that the average black member who was involved with Vlakplaas knew that there was money involved in actions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="351">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="352">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You say that Mamasela was with Mfalapitsa on the evening or during the day of the incident?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="353">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  He took him there and left the scene afterwards.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="354">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  So he transported Mfalapitsa and the Cosas members from one place to the place where the incident took place?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="355">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="356">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Visser.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="357">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="358">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Coetzee you may be confused.  He referred to black members and you do not distinguish between policemen and Askari members.  Is there a distinction with regard to these rewards that you have mentioned or was there no distinction?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="359">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>There is indeed a distinction.  The opinion that black members also worked for a salary like we did and for that reason they did not receive those rewards and that only turned or rehabilitated Askaris would receive rewards.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="360">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I think for that reason previous evidence may have been confusing.  So policemen were not rewarded.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="361">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="362">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And that would be for exceptional bravery or the uncommon adherence to duties.  You were aware of such a situation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="363">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Yes I heard of that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="364">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>But this is not what we are talking about here.  We are talking about actions during the struggle of the past and you would concur then as I understand you, that policemen were not rewarded.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="365">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="366">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="367">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="368">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And mostly they received money for services rendered.  In other words upon achievement.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="369">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="370">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Now that achievement, was that the</text>
		</line>
		<line number="371">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>commission of illegal acts for which they were rewarded with money or was it about arrests, about legal actions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="372">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>I would say that it was mostly about legal actions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="373">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And let it not be said that we have said something which once again creates confusion.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="374">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="375">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="376">
			<speaker>ADV GCABASHE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="377">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>For legal actions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="378">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR VISSER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="379">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Adv Jansen have you got anything ...(indistinct)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="380">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>Yes Mr Chairman I do.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="381">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="382">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="383">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>And the Askaris, that being ANC members who had joined the SAP or had started working for the S A P, were always registered as Head office informers and that they were paid in that way.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="384">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="385">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>In 1981 for example Joe Mamasela was a registered informer who worked for you in the West Rand.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="386">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="387">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>However, he lived at Vlakplaas for security reasons.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="388">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="389">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>And when you took over in 1982, I think it was in the beginning of January.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="390">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="391">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>Was that the logical consequence of your connection with Mamasela, that he would go over to Vlakplaas on a permanent basis.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="392">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="393">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="394">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Let me explain it as follows.  In other words such an Askari would have to prove himself first.  He would have to prove himself to be reliable and trustworthy.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="395">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="396">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="397">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="398">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson my knowledge about that subject with regard to the previous practice of paying these individuals a monthly amount created problems because the police budget came from secret funds and funds were limited and so forth and in order to overcome that financial problem it was decided to make them policemen and pay them a salary and keep the reward, because those rewards would</text>
		</line>
		<line number="399">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>have to be requested every month along with motivations for why these rewards were required and this was creating problems and that was the reason why, after a while when it was determined that they were reliable and trustworthy, the decision was taken to make them police members.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="400">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>But would you confirm that upon the arrival of such a person at Vlakplaas, such a person would be registered as a Head office informer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="401">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="402">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>And such a person would then be paid on a discreet basis with regards to information received and the practice at that stage of monthly payments and so forth.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="403">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="404">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>But it was not an uncommon practice for a person to pay his informer a monthly amount?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="405">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>If it was justifiable, it would be done in such a way.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="406">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>There would be certain typical practices of payment according to which a person would be paid on a monthly basis, but there would also be practices according to which informers would be paid per occasion for their supply of information.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="407">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="408">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="409">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So you cannot confirm that R1 000 was paid?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="410">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>No, I cannot confirm that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="411">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="412">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, may I just refer you to page 225 and perhaps my learned friend could take this up with his client, you will see that there is a discrepancy of R100.00 as opposed to R1 000.00.  One of the two must be wrong, so it may be R100.00.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="413">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="414">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="415">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="416">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Visser, is there anything else.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="417">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Except that we might consider taking a tea adjournment now.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="418">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="419">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>He is going to have to stay on until my learned friend has clarified his position because Mr Coetzee is from Durban and when he leaves it will be difficult to get him back.  I suggest he rather stays and not be excused.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="420">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that makes sense.  Do you follow Mr Coetzee?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="421">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Yes I do.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="422">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="423">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>