<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>JOHN FREDERICK WILLIAMS</type>
	<startdate>1999-05-10</startdate>
	<location>JOHANNESBURG</location>
	<day>10</day>
								<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=53364&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/1999/99050321_jhb_990518jh.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="157">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman with your leave I wish to call Mr Williams.  We have prepared a statement for him which I typed over the weekend and which my attorney made me retype last night, so you have a redrafted statement for him which will be Exhibit U, I believe Mr Chairman, which we beg leave to hand up to you.	It&#039;s a brief statement.  This witness&#039; evidence won&#039;t be long Chairperson.  It&#039;s U...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Was that the letter of the 4th ...(indistinct)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Oh yes, oh yes, I am sorry, absolutely right.  Civil Service of Swaziland, yes.  And then this will - thank you Commissioner de Jager, then this will be Exhibit V, I am sorry Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>EXHIBIT V HANDED UP</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Sorry Mr Chairman just before we continue with the witness I in the meantime got instructions from Mr Veyi, the article which my learned friend has referred to, I wasn&#039;t sure when he spoke about it whether it&#039;s the same but it is.  Mr Veyi confirms that he is there the Mr X also referred to in that article about the pointing-out of the safe houses.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker>JAMES FREDERICK WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Mr Williams you are also an applicant for amnesty in the current proceedings and your participation or your involvement is not as great as that of the previous witness.  We shall get to that involvement soon, but it regards the abduction and detention of Nokuthula Simelane.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Your application appears in Bundle 3 on page 581 to 592, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And do you confirm the correctness of the contents thereof?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>I do Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And you have studied Exhibit A, the general background document?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And did you study this thoroughly?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>I did Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And do you concur that the contents thereof, according to your knowledge, is correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And that you as that this be incorporated with your evidence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And you also request that the amnesty applications as it appears thus far of Supt Pretorius and Supt Coetzee, Mong and W/O Ross also be considered with your application, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Are you still in the police force?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>Yes I am.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>What is your rank?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>Superintendent.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Where are you stationed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>At Potchefstroom.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>In which division?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>(No audible reply)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Now may I ask you to look at page 2 please, paragraph 2 you said that in 1983 you were part of the Intelligence Unit at Security Branch Soweto, and you served under the command of Supt Coetzee.  Then he was a lieutenant.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And what was your rank then?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>I was a sergeant Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>He has given evidence here, you have heard his evidence which is said in paragraph 3 that an MK courier was on his way to South Africa and had instructions to make contact and to transport instructions and that a meeting with whom we know is now Mr Mkhonza was arranged for this courier to meet at Carlton Centre, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>You were informed that this meeting between Mr Coetzee and Brigadier H Muller was discussed with a commander.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And a meeting was held at the Custodum flats where on the roof of the 10th floor you had servant&#039;s quarters that you used as an office.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And at this meeting certain information was given to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>At paragraph 5 could you please put it to the Committee?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>Certainly.  At a meeting all the members, who I will refer to later, was informed by Supt Coetzee that it was decided by Brigadier Muller that the MK courier during the meeting would be abducted and we had to immediately start turning this person.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I realised that this was unlawful to arrest a person, to turn this person without this person being charged or without this person being held in detention, according to the correct regulations.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	At the same time the Security Branch could not oppose the revolutionary onslaught without information from the enemy.  We were forced to launch such actions and I saw that it was within my tacit authorisation.  I associated myself with the action on this particular day in approximately September 1983.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	The movements of the abovementioned MK courier was monitored by the following persons whose names I can recall at the Carlton Centre.  It was myself, Supt Coetzee; Supt Pretorius; W/O Mong; Sergeant Radebe; Sergeant Selamolela; Constable Veyi and Sergeant Mothiba.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Current W/O Ross, we don&#039;t know what his rank was then.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>He was a sergeant.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>You don&#039;t mention him here.  Shall we accept that he was there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>Definitely Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Can you recall this from later recollection?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>If you refer to RS234 you can refer to Mkhonza and when you refer to RS269 you can refer to Sgt Langa.  Can you continue with paragraph 8?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>Certainly.  Sergeant Mkhonza met her the particular day.  Only with the meeting it was realised that the MK courier was a female person.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Did you know this before the meeting at the Carlton Centre that the courier would be a woman?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>Definitely not Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	She went to the ...(tape side A ends)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>...and afterwards we left for Norwood .  On our arrival we withdrew from the flats there and according to instructions from Supt Coetzee we went about some other tasks.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Later the same day Supt Coetzee asked me to accompany him to the house of Brigadier Muller because he did not know where it was.  I accompanied him and we had a discussion with the Brigadier.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="61">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>That was a Saturday?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="62">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>Yes I think that&#039;s common cause.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="63">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>So this was the Saturday afternoon?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="64">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="65">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Supt Coetzee reported to Brigadier Muller.  The latter decided that the matter had to be discussed with head office.  Afterwards we went to Brigadier Schoon at head office and he was informed and that it was told to him that the idea was to turn Simelane.  Brig Schoon gave his permission for this.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="66">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Was an agreement reached telephonically?  Were you present during this discussion at the office?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="67">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>Yes I was partially present.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="68">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Did you have anything else to do with Miss Simelane?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="69">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>Absolutely nothing.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="70">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>May I just ask you, there have been some allegations that Mr Coetzee and/or others would have killed Simelane, do you have any knowledge which indicates that the police could have killed Miss Simelane?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="71">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>I have no such knowledge Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="72">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Did you receive any information whether she was recruited as a source or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="73">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>They did not discuss it with me but I received the message that they were using her, yes Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="74">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Can you continue with paragraph 13.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="75">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>Very well.  The actions and omissions which I am guilty of I have done in the execution of my official duties under instruction of a senior officer whose instructions I was obliged to obey.  I did this as part of the opposition of the struggle and it was aimed at the supporters of a liberation movement.  What I had done I had done to protect the government and the National Party and to oppose the revolutionary onslaught.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="76">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>You say you were a sergeant at this stage, how long before this incident, from approximately September 1983, how long were you then with the Intelligence Division under Mr Coetzee?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="77">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson it was approximately two weeks.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="78">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Two weeks, you were very new in the Intelligence Division.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="79">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>Yes that&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="80">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And you had an instruction which you had to comply with?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="81">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="82">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>At any stage did you physically assault or touch Miss Simelane?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="83">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>No I never touched her at all, not at all Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="84">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>So it is obvious then that you had no comprehension as to Mr Coetzee&#039;s method that he went about his work?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="85">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="86">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>So you request amnesty for your involvement in this incident.  If we could refer to page 2 as it would seem from the evidence it is conspiracy to abduct Simelane, and you say you knew it was an unlawful act; and then the abduction of the mentioned Simelane; as well as the assistance in this act and the unlawful arrest and detention of this person; and then defeating the ends of justice with regard to the omission and the true facts of the matter, as well as defeating the ends of justice or any other offence or delict emanating from your evidence, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="87">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="88">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="89">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR VISSER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="90">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you very much.  Mr Lamey questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="91">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Mr Williams paragraph 7 of this Exhibit U, you mention a list of persons who were present at the Carlton Centre.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="92">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="93">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>With the arrest my instructions from Mr Veyi is that he was not present there and that he later joined that arrest at Norwood.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="94">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>It is possible Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="95">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>So you concede that you might be mistaken here by mentioning his name here?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="96">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>Yes I may be mistaken.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="97">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>I would like to ask you, before I hand in paragraph 5 you say at a meeting the members who I will refer later to, is this &quot;later&quot; referred to, is this the members that you mention in the list at the bottom here and on the next page, paragraph 7?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="98">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct.  So what you are saying is Veyi and Selamolela were present at the meeting where it was discussed that this MK courier would be abducted to start turning her?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="99">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s how I recall it Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="100">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="101">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>I may be mistaken as well.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="102">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>I may be wrong but my recollection of Mr Coetzee&#039;s evidence is indeed that the black members were not present during the whole, or were not aware of this turning action during this whole operation, if I understand his evidence correctly.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="103">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>How I can answer you Chairperson is that the persons who were present were informed as to what their tasks were and everybody knew what his task was.  Although who exactly was there I cannot say with great certainty.  But that everybody received his specific task, that I can recall.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="104">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Is it not possible that during this discussion, if such a discussion did indeed take place, can you definitely recall that this issue of turning was discussed at that occasion, was this before the arrest or was it only later after the arrest when this was cleared with Brigadier Schoon at head office that that was the moment when it was decided on the turning action?  Or was it from the initial process?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="105">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>I recall that we definitely knew that we would turn her and I also drew the inference from the instructions which we received.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="106">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>But what you are saying is that some of the black members, Selamolela and Veyi, that they were not present and that they would have not known about this turning action?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="107">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>I can honestly not recall who exactly were present.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="108">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>I put it to you that my instructions are that on paragraph 3 on page 566 he says that he was never present with any briefing, he was never personally briefed and he did not know what would happen.  He received instruction that he had to be present at the Carlton Centre and to take her to the police station, the arrest, where the seeming arrest would take place.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="109">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>I cannot argue with his version.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="110">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t think there is anything further.  Thank you Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="111">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR LAMEY</text>
		</line>
		<line number="112">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Lamey.  Mr van den Berg?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="113">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR VAN DEN BERG</text>
		</line>
		<line number="114">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="115">
			<speaker>FURTHER CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Just one moment I have omitted something Chairperson, there is something that bothers me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="116">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Can you say with conviction that there was no communication, that the person who Mr Mkhonza was to meet in the Carlton Centre would be a woman?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="117">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>Definitely not Chairperson, but to give you an idea of what happened there my task was to keep Mr Mkhonza in my vision and we did not know that he was to - I was not aware that he was to meet a woman Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="118">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>But he says that he knew he was to meet a woman and this is how he communicated it to Coetzee.  For your identification it would be important to know that he was to meet a woman, or is that not the proper inference to draw?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="119">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>I am convinced that we did not know it was to be a woman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="120">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Do you not think that if such communication was conveyed from Mkhonza to Coetzee that it was important for Coetzee to know what the sex of the person would be?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="121">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>I would have been important for the action Chairperson because we could have planned it somewhat different.  But because we did not know who we would expect and that is why we amended the planning for the abduction as such, so that we could handle any situation and we were not aware of her sex.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="122">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>No further questions thank you Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="123">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Ms Thabethe.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="124">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>Just one question Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="125">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Williams when earlier on you said you had received a message that Nokuthula was being used by the police where did you receive this message from?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="126">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>The colleagues whom I worked with told me a week or two later after she was abducted told me that they were using her.  I drew the inference that they were withdrawing information from her.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="127">
			<speaker>MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chair, no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="128">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MS THABETHE</text>
		</line>
		<line number="129">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Ms Thabethe.  Was it Brigadier Schoon who authorised this whole operation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="130">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="131">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What did he say, what can you do?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="132">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>I was not present the whole time when the discussion took place in the office between Muller and Brigadier Schoon and what I can recall is that he authorised the turning of her.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="133">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What did he say?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="134">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>I cannot recall Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="135">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did he say you could kill the person?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="136">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>No he never at any stage said something like that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="137">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did he say you can assault the person?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="138">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="139">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>He definitely did not say that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="140">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>Not at all.  He said we can continue with the operation but he did not give any permission to that nature.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="141">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Any other questions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="142">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>And this was after the abduction took place?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="143">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="144">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>The same day?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="145">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, the same afternoon.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="146">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>And the abduction took place without Schoon&#039;s knowledge?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="147">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>Correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="148">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>And then you went over and he said Muller could continue to recruit her or to turn her or whatever, I don&#039;t know what term was used.  Is there a specific term that was used or was the word &quot;turn her&quot; used?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="149">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>Yes Chairperson the word &quot;turn her&quot; was used.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="150">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Any re-examination Mr Visser?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="151">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO RE-EXAMINATION BY MR VISSER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="152">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You are excused Mr Williams.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="153">
			<speaker>MR WILLIAMS</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="154">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
		<line number="155">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson I understand there is a threat of cutting in on our lunch time.  I now see it&#039;s six minutes past.  Perhaps we could take the lunch now and reconvene again at what, twenty to?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="156">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes we will take the luncheon adjournment for 30 minutes and we will reconvene at 13H40.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="157">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>