<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>EUGENE ALEXANDER DE KOCK</type>
	<startdate>1999-06-14</startdate>
	<location>PRETORIA</location>
	<day>13</day>
		<case>0066/96</case>
						<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=53427&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/1999/9905240623_pre_990614pt.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="422">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Right, who is the next applicant?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>I think, with your approval, Mr de Kock should be the next one, Mr Chairman.  May I call him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I think you can sit down for the moment because they seem to be having trouble.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>EUGENE ALEXANDER DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>And, upon previous occasions you have already given evidence and, upon those occasions you have given a general submission regarding your application with reference to various incidents.  And you confirm the content thereof?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>And do you once again confirm that today?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>And also in your supplementary affidavit with regard to Vlakplaas, you have studied this and do you confirm the correctness thereof?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Upon the occasion when the evidence about Vlakplaas in general was heard, you referred to a document which was handed over by Mr Visser and others to us and has been marked as Exhibit A during that hearing, do you recall this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>And you studied this document and do you once again confirm the correctness of the content of the allegations contained within this document?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>And then, on page 9 of the bundle with regard to this incident, you discuss your version regarding the particular incident.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Have you studied this and do you confirm the correctness of the content thereof?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>At that stage, how long had you been at Vlakplaas when this operation took place?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Approximately four months.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>And you were under the command of Brigadier Cronje?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>What was his rank at that stage?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>He was a lieutenant-colonel.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>And did you give you the order to become involved in this operation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Did you comply or participate in the planning for the operation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Where was this planning undertaken?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Among others, discussions were held at Vlakplaas and further discussions were also held in Swaziland itself.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Very well.  The members who were involved, were they you, yourself, from Vlakplaas and who else?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Colonel Cronje, warrant-officer Van Dyk, Mr Bosego, Nofomela and Joe Mamosela.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>And then there were also members from other security units, from the South African Police who were involved?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Rorich, Mr Pienaar and Mr van Zweel.  There was also a Mr Deetlefs but he was not present during this particular incident.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Can you tell us briefly what the order was which you received with regard to this operation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, the order was that Mr Nyanda, Mr McFadden and Mr Lawrence were very active in Swaziland and were creating great problems in the Northern Natal area.  That this group had to be wiped out and this phrase was used repeatedly by Colonel Cronje.  The group that had to be wiped out here would then be Messrs Nyanda, McFadden and Lawrence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>How did you go about launching the operation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Very well, how did the operation unfold from there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>So, in other words you did reconnaissance first?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Yes, we reconnoitred the area.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>And during this reconnaissance, did you notice any persons within the house or outside the house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>No, it appeared to be entirely deserted.  It stood there deserted, there were no other vehicles parked there.  It was clear that there was no person residing there on a permanent basis.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>And once you had completed the reconnaissance?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>And he had to depart for some or other reason and could not be present the following evening?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>What did you do then?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Pienaar, van Zweel and I returned to the hotel where we found Colonel Cronje.  We awoke him and the other members and we took our weapons out of the place where we concealed them and we moved in the vehicle to this house for the attack.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Were these weapons fitted with silencers?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  There was two Perchets, those are British weapons with an integrated silencer system.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Is it a hand weapon or a gun?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>They are hand carbine types, almost similar to the Sting but just upgraded.  We also had HMKs, those are 9mm hand carbines with silencers and we also had two AK-47s.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="61">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>With silencers?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="62">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="63">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Why was it necessary to make use of such weapons such as AKs?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="64">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, this would have been in case we encounter extra or more resistance in the house or if we ran into security forces in order to get out of the situation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="65">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>That would be the similar reason for taking AK-47s to the Chand residence as you have given evidence previously?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="66">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="67">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="68">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="69">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="70" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="71">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Now when you arrived there, did you see any person running to the vehicles to report to you as the allegation here maintains?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="72">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="73">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>What did you drive in?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="74">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>They were sedan vehicles.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="75">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>How many?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="76">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="77">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>But there were two  vehicles which were described as vans, were there any such vehicles?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="78">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>No, not according to my recollection.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="79">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>And you say that there was no Mercedes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="80">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="81">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>You have given a description about how you took in your position at the window where you were supposed to take your position in the first place.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="82">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="83">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>What happened next?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="84">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="85">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>What happened next?  Did the shock grenade go off?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="86">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  It had a double action, it would give two explosions.  The objective was disorientation without shrapnel.  I then observed that Colonel Cronje was standing in front of the back door that he was firing his Machete into the door at the lock and handle section.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="87">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Was the door closed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="88">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it was closed and locked.  Mr van Zweel was with him.  I then left that section where I had been stationed and ran to Colonel Cronje to help him to kick the door in.  In the process, I seriously injured my foot, I broke my toe and in the process, when the door finally went open, Colonel Cronje ran in with van Zweel behind him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="89">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="90">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="91">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="92">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="93">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Could you identify this person?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="94">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, he looked like the person who I had seen on photos, he looked like the person who had been identified as Mr Nyanda.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="95">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Had you ever seen this person in real life before this incident?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="96">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  On one incident when we had tried to attack the group and it looked to me to be the same person.  In his right hand there was a hand palm case and, warrant-officer Pienaar tried to remove it.  We saw that is was attached to his wrist by means of a loop and I think that he had vehicle keys or what appeared to be car keys.  The rest of the group moved up from behind and we began to withdraw.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="97">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, might this be a convenient stage to take the adjournment?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="98">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Take the adjournment?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="99">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="100">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="101">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="102">
			<speaker>EUGENE ALEXANDER DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>(s.u.o.)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="103">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>(cont)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="104">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="105">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>That is correct and I have just been informed of that by Mr Hattingh.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="106">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>You explained that after the shooting in the house you withdrew back to the vehicles, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="107">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="108">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Can you say, from within your own knowledge that you saw how many people in the house were shot dead?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="109">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I saw a man lying in the one room on the left side, if you move down in an eastern direction, in the passage.  However I did not know who it was.  I saw no other dead persons there apart from the blood mark which lead to the bathroom.  And that person who was in that room was also shot dead.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="110">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Outside the house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="111">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="112">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Do you know whether there were any women in the house?  Did you hear or see any women?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="113">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.  When we arrived at the hotel, we had a quick discussion which was very brief and orders were given by Cronje and there I was informed that there had been a woman who had hidden in a cupboard or underneath a bed, I am not entirely certain.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="114">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>And that she was not harmed in any way?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="115">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="116">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Of your own people, were any one of you injured?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="117">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson.  When I arrived at my vehicle upon our withdrawal, Bosego called me, he was approximately 12 metres to the east of the vehicles.  I moved in that direction, he got up and then fell down again.  He told me that he had been shot, at that stage the vehicles began to pull away, they were approximately 20 metres away but the back vehicle reversed.  I then helped Bosego from there and we left in that vehicle.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="118">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>You did not see when he was shot.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="119">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="120">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="121">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="122">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>In your application you state that he was shot by Mr Rorich.  Does he know about that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="123">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="124">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="125">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="126">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>You mean other than at the regular border post?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="127">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="128">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>In other words you moved across the border illegally?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="129">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="130">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>And did you report to anybody when you arrived back in Pretoria?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="131">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson.  I was the driver of the vehicle, early that morning we arrived in Pretoria.  It was between 06h00 and 08h00.  I remained in the vehicle and Colonel Cronje went in to Head Office to report.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="132">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>And is that the sum total of your knowledge of this incident?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="133">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="134">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Do you know whether anything was found in the house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="135">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="136">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Was anything said about this after the time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="137">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Yes, at the debriefing, it was said that documentation had been found.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="138">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Did you study these documents?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="139">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>No.  However I saw the top document, it was an A4 paper when Colonel Cronje climbed out of the vehicle at Head Office.  And it looked like a sketch as if it was some form of a sketch of a road system or an environment, it was a hand sketch.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="140">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>How did you regard this operation?  In what light did you regard it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="141">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Well, it was an operation which was aimed against terrorism and terrorist activities, it was cross border, whether you shoot on this side of the border or that side, it still remains murder.  And for me it was just another foreign operation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="142">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>And you acted under the orders of Colonel Cronje?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="143">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.  But I would like to use this opportunity to say that I personally accept responsibility for my own actions and my own conduct at the scene.  I do not ask that Cronje do this, I do not want it, I will bear my own responsibilities.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="144">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>And the prevention of terrorism, to combat terrorism in an internal community, the security of the Republic and a service to the National Party which was the government.  One cannot say that this was a community service but it was a service to the State.  Community service would be to save an elderly person from a burning house but to go and shoot somebody on the other side of the border who held different views to you was a service to the State.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="145">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Then, in conclusion, you have heard what I put to Brigadier Schoon with regard to false claims and so forth.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="146">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson.  I will stand by my affidavits in that regard.  I will stand by what I have stated about that and I believe that in future we will receive further evidence about this.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="147">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>In other words, do you confirm your versions as contained within your original application and supplemented within the document which deals with Vlakplaas specifically?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="148">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I will stand by that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="149">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>And do you also confirm the correctness of the statements which I put on your behalf to Brigadier Schoon?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="150">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Yes, unequivocally.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="151">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairman, we have no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="152">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR HATTINGH</text>
		</line>
		<line number="153">
			<speaker>MR KNIGHT</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairman, Julian Knight on behalf of implicated person Nofomela, I have no questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="154">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR KNIGHT</text>
		</line>
		<line number="155">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.  Prinsloo on behalf of applicant Pienaar and van Zweel.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="156">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr de Kock, is it correct that initially the then Colonel Deetlefs pointed the house out to Cronje while Pienaar was present?  Do you recall that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="157">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="158">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Is it correct that afterwards, Mr Pienaar went to the house and pointed this house to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="159">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="160">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Furthermore, with regard to your action there at that specific house, according to Mr Pienaar and Mr van Zweel, there may be a possibility of confusion in your mind regarding who entered the house.  Pienaar says that he entered the house along with you and that in the house, he shot a person there who later appeared to be McFadden.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="161">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="162">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>According to Mr Pienaar, he did indeed enter the house and he along with Mr Cronje fired at that person who later appeared to be Mr McFadden.  According to Mr van Zweel he was initially at the door with Mr Cronje but when they could not open the door, you kicked the door open and that is when van Zweel moved around the house and held watch outside the house at a window.  And that is why I am putting it to you that Mr Pienaar is the person who moved in and that you are confused between the two.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="163">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="164">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>According to Mr van Zweel, he did not fire any shots in the house at all and he remained outside.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="165">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, that may be his recollection.  However he made specific use of the Scorpion which was a low calibre weapon.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="166">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="167">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="168">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Pienaar says that things happened very quickly there and that he indeed fire in one shot to the head of the person who was known to him to be Zweli Nyanda and it appeared at that stage that the person was still alive.  But, he does not recall anything about a case which was removed from the person.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="169">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I will not dispute the number of shots that he fired into the head of the victim.  The case was there, I have no doubt about that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="170">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="171">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="172">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And, Mr de Kock, at that stage, were there many attacks which were launched by the ANC from Swaziland?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="173">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="174">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="175">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR PRINSLOO</text>
		</line>
		<line number="176">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MS VAN DER WALT</text>
		</line>
		<line number="177">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Louisa van der Walt for the record.  Mr de Kock, upon conclusion of your evidence, you have put your initial application more clearly with regard to Mr Rorich denies that he shot this person in the foot but, you have just rectified the matter, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="178">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="179">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>No further questions, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="180">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MS VAN DER WALT</text>
		</line>
		<line number="181">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR WAGENER</speaker>
			<text>Jan Wagener, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="182">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="183">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>I recall that very clearly.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="184">
			<speaker>MR WAGENER</speaker>
			<text>Are you saying through that that General Engelbrecht attempted to defeat the ends of justice?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="185">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  And to harm a person as well.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="186">
			<speaker>MR WAGENER</speaker>
			<text>Now, I see that you mention here that the object of that would have been to prove that Nofomela was not telling the truth.  Do you mean that Nofomela gave evidence that he shot Bosego and you say that the purpose of this amputation would have been to prove that Nofomela was not telling the truth?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="187">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson, because then there would be no scar on the foot that had been shot.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="188">
			<speaker>MR WAGENER</speaker>
			<text>Mr de Kock, this entire statement that you make here with regard to General Engelbrecht, are you serious about this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="189">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="190">
			<speaker>MR WAGENER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="191">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="192">
			<speaker>MR WAGENER</speaker>
			<text>Exactly, can you recall?  And it would appear that you recall that during the Harms Commission, medical evidence was given to the effect that the man had not been shot at in the foot.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="193">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Yes, we made certain of this before Bosego gave his evidence.  There was a mark on his foot which appeared to be the result of having stepped on a hot coal with a bare foot.  It would be the similar kind of mark that that would leave and I am very aware of that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="194">
			<speaker>MR WAGENER</speaker>
			<text>Mr de Kock, General Engelbrecht denies this allegation of yours.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="195">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I expected that.  I would have been surprised if he had reacted any differently.  This works according to the same system which we maintained at the Harms Commission, the system of denials.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="196">
			<speaker>MR WAGENER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="197">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, that is something which one cannot make up.  I sat there, that is what General Engelbrecht said, I have repeated it and I will stand by it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="198">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And what would Mr Bosego have said about the loss of his foot ...(indistinct) he was having his foot removed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="199">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>He would definitely not have agreed with it.  On the contrary, Mr Bosego disappeared at a stage and he found himself in the Mafikeng area to the extent that Mr Nortje and Ras went to look for Mr Bosego.  They went there by helicopter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="200">
			<speaker>MR WAGENER</speaker>
			<text>Mr de Kock, I put it to you that this is just another attempt of yours to get at the generals.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="201">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson, I would say that that is part of a discreditation campaign.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="202">
			<speaker>MR WAGENER</speaker>
			<text>Your discreditation campaign towards the generals.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="203">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>No, it worked for Dirk Coetzee, it worked for Nofomela.  The situation about the Griffiths Mxenge story, it&#039;s an historical fact, my own evidence during the Harms Commission is an historical face, we cannot distort that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="204">
			<speaker>MR WAGENER</speaker>
			<text>No further questions, thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="205">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR WAGENER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="206">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairman, Visser on record.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="207">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="208">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I am not certain.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="209">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Well, let me put it to you like this, according to your insight, was there anything illegal about bringing weapons which had been possessed by the police in Ovamboland to South Africa?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="210">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson, we brought these weapons in for our duties.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="211">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Very well, then I would like to take you to what you said with regard to the supply of weapons and the submission of so called false claims regarding Mr Steyn.  Just for the benefit of the Committee, that is bundle 2, page 30, paragraph 2.2.18.2.  This refers to incident 12 in volume 2, page 332, incident 13, volume 2, page 339 as well.  And there is a further reference, that would be bundle 2, page 36, paragraph 2.2.22.1 and 2.2.22.2.  And that refers to incident 12, volume 1 page 325, in volume 12, page 332 and this is the allegation.  You say that you provided AK-47 guns to General Steyn for their own purposes as you put it.  Can you recall this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="212">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="213">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>If General Steyn says that upon one occasion he received one AK-47 from you, would you say that that would be a correct statement or an incorrect statement?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="214">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>No, that is incorrect.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="215">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Well, that is what he says and he denies that on any other occasion except one occasion he received an AK-47 from you and this is a matter for which amnesty has been applied.  Mr Chairman, you might remember reference was made to the Quarry road incident during the Natal hearings and that is in connection with that particular incident.  General Steyn says that you are mistaken when you say or when you recall it as such, that he requested you to falsely claim money to give to him in order to remunerate his informers.  He denies this, he maintains that he had almost a half a million rands in funds which he could use for this purpose and that this money had been allocated to his division.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="216">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson, then I must say that General Steyn is a liar.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="217">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Very well.  Let us hear what you have to say about Mr Adriaan Vlok because he maintains that the reference to the purchase of furniture from your fund, if this is intended to refer to him, he maintains that this is untrue.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="218">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="219">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Which Minister?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="220">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Minister Adriaan Vlok.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="221">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Well, he denies this.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="222">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>I have no problem with that.  I would expect that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="223">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Just tell the Committee please, did you hear that he wanted furniture or did you see that his furniture was not up to standard?  How did it come about that you decided to purchase the furniture from the fund?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="224">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>I was approached by Brigadier Schoon and Louis Koekemoer worked with that aspect.  I did not fill in the false claim, I did not purchase the furniture, I did not obtain the money.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="225">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="226">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>We will have to hear that from them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="227">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>But, you see, you have once again dragged Brigadier Schoon into this story.  And this differs from what you did in your evidence in chief.  But let us just leave it at that.  Can you think of any reason why furniture would be acquired for a Minister&#039;s office by means of false claims?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="228">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, that is not the reason for me.  I simply provided the money and it was used for that purpose.  The ministers will have to answer to that if they wish to be honest and that would include, among others, Colonel Koekemoer and Brigadier Schoon.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="229">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Did Mr Vlok thank you for these furniture items which you would have purchased for him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="230">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>No, we simply received a stiff handshake and a piece of meat to braai.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="231">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>For these items of furniture that you had purchased?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="232">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>No, just in general.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="233">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Mr Willem Coetzee says that he was not involved with the establishment of a dead letter box at Krugersdorp.  In bundle 2 on page 30, you refer to that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="234">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>I think the word Willem Coetzee is incorrect, it was Colonel Jan Coetzee from Krugersdorp who was the previous commander of Vlakplaas.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="235">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="236">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>It was Colonel Rudi Crause.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="237">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Requested from Brigadier Willem Schoon that you, Mr de Kock, supplied him with explosives to blow up the body of an ANC member who was killed in the cells in Mafikeng, do you recall that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="238">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.  The request was that we had to remove that person and to take his life which was done.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="239">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Very well.  Crause and Loots, and I am afraid I did not ask Mr Schoon while he was here, he also denies any knowledge of this incident.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="240">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="241">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="242">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="243">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="244">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>If they did play a role in there, because they would apply for amnesty.  I think they want to keep their egos intact and Brigadier Schoon did this by applying for amnesty in 18 incidents, then he did not apply for everything, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="245">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="246">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson, there would be two instances.  The one is with the killing of ANC terrorists in Manzini and if I think of the names, it was Maris, Pantso and another person.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="247">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	And then there was a second instance where along with General Erasmus, General Gerrit Erasmus, Brigadier Schoon, Brigadier Oosthuizen and Willem Coetzee as the handler wanted to lure a group of people to Swaziland...(interjects)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="248">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>These are the seven members?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="249">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Excuse me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="250">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>These are the seven members?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="251">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>No, it was a kombi with more, I think there were ten or 12 but, then it was only a vehicle with three persons who were lured to there and we shot them there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="252">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="253">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR VISSER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="254">
			<speaker>CROSS EXAMINATION BY MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson, B Mohlaba on record.  I have a few questions.  Grant me a moment, please.  Thank you.  Mr de Kock, how did you know about the existence of Zweli Nyanda and his activities?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="255">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I read some security reports which came from Natal and the Eastern Transvaal.  I want to imagine that there were some reports from Northern Natal and I was also informed by Colonel Cronje and amongst others, the Eastern Transvaal security branch.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="256">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>And you mentioned that the planning for the wiping out of Zweli Nyanda and the others was carried out in Pretoria as well as in Swaziland, did I get you correctly?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="257">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson.  Some of the planning took place at Vlakplaas and then as far as I know, the rest was done in Swaziland at the scene.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="258">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>The planning in Pretoria, are you able to tell us who was taking part in such planning?  Was it in a particular forum where this issue was discussed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="259">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="260">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>To put it differently, before you could move to Swaziland, to carry out this operation, I assume that some discussion was conducted at Pretoria before you could go out.  Could you remember who participated in such a discussion, if any?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="261">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, what was discussed at Vlakplaas is what Colonel Cronje said where he spoke, Van Dyk spoke and I believe that Cronje also because I know the black members had to use false passports just like us.  It was not a normal situation, the needs were not so many.  We had limited needs.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="262">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>If you could recall, was there any responsibilities allocated to the people who were to move out to Swaziland for this operation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="263">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Yes Chairperson, Col Cronje was the responsible person for this operation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="264">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>Was there a detailed discussion as to the type of rules which each individual was to play, that is amongst the group which went to Swaziland for this operation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="265">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, no.  We waited until we got to Swaziland before places or posts were appointed.  In other words, who will stand on which corner, who will break the window, who will penetrate the house first.  Those details were done at the hotel where we staying in Swaziland.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="266">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>And according to what was discussed at the hotel in Swaziland, how many people were to participate in this actual operation?  Was it yourself and who else?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="267">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="268">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Can I interrupt for a moment?  I think I understood from your evidence that you had not been a description of the house.  You were merely told it was a house there and you were taken to it after you arrived in Swaziland?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="269">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="270">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="271">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson, the only information that we had was that it was a temporary structure.  The panels, the walls were a type of asbestos, it was a removable thing, that is why we used stun grenades.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="272">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Had you been told that before you went?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="273">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Yes, there was information.  The size of the house was not available to us, whether it was a five bedroomed house or a two bedroomed house but, the information with regard to the structure was at our disposal because Colonel Cronje wanted to use M26 handgrenades which contained explosives and we would have been hit by the shrapnel if we did use them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="274">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>De Kock, do you remember who provided you with the information regarding the location of this house where the attack was carried out?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="275">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Please repeat, please.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="276">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>Do you remember the person who provided information about the exact location of the house in which the attack was carried out?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="277">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it was warrant-officer Pienaar who pointed out the house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="278">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="279">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.  I would accept that Mr Deetlefs must have told him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="280">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>In this particular operation, were you assisted by way of information by other persons who were not necessarily members of the security forces or Askaris?  That is it could be Swaziland citizens or other people within South Africa?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="281">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson.  Here we will refer to a source, never mind the nationality of the person.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="282">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>Are you saying that in this particular case, you had a source which provided you with information, which source was not security officer or an Askari, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="283">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="284">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>Have you ever heard of the name Edward Lawrence or Cyril Raymond in relation to this particular incident?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="285">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="286">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>Was he present in this particular house when the operation was launched?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="287">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="288">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>Can you just expand on that?  You said he moved with Mr Nyanda, at what stage? You referring to a moment when Mr Nyanda burst out of the bathroom window, are you referring to that moment?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="289">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson, just before I went into the house, after the long burst that came from the other side of the house, I did indeed see somebody running in an easterly direction.  In other words, away from the house where at that point I wanted to fired on this person and decided not to because I was not sure whether it was one of my members who ran there.  Or whether he was following somebody else.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="290">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="291">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="292">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>Would one of your members run away from the scene of the target where you were supposed to attack?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="293">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.  I did not say somebody ran away or that one of my members ran away.  One of the members might have decided to follow somebody who was running away.  But I could not take the risk, in that case I must allow that person to get away before I shoot one of my own people.  And as I have said previously, policemen learn to think on the ground, think on your feet, one of our greatest problems at that stage was that we did not have internal radio communication at that stage.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="294">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>And was it dark within the vicinity where this attack was carried out?  What was the source of light there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="295">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, yes, it was dark.  I want to imagine and I use the word imagine, that there was a street light or a street lamp there.  It was quite a weak light though.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="296">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>Did you at the time or subsequently after the fact, did you identify the owner of the house in which these people were killed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="297">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson, I did not.  I continued with my normal services and I did not enquire about it afterwards.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="298">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>You have mentioned that at the debriefing after the attack, that is at the hotel, there was mention of a woman who was left unharmed, did I get you correctly?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="299">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="300">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>Was there any reason why this woman was not shot at?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="301">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="302">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="303">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR MOHLABA</text>
		</line>
		<line number="304">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Ramula Patel.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="305">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="306">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, we departed with that knowledge.  It was emphasised by Colonel Cronje that Head Quarters wants this group, Nyanda, McFadden and Lawrence, they wanted them wiped out.  It was also emphasised in Swaziland at the hotel where we went.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="307">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>In Pretoria and again in Swaziland?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="308">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="309">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="310">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.  That information was given to us here and this why the group was adjusted to the amount of men that there were.  And those names were mentioned according to the information notes and the security reports that I read.  I mean Mr Lawrence was just as active in the ANC ranks as Mr Nyanda.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="311">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="312">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>It was Mr Lawrence, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="313">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Was this information relayed to you by Mr Cronje or was it given to you by Brigadier Schoon as well?  Can you recall?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="314">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, it was given to me by Colonel Cronje.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="315">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Regarding Mr Deetlefs role, was he present at the planning meeting at Vlakplaas where the conspiracy to murder had taken place?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="316">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="317">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Okay, so he was present at the second discussion in Swaziland?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="318">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>He was involved with the discussion that we had in Swaziland, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="319">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Was he involved in the reconnoitring of the target?  Of the physical structure, that is?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="320">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="321">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>You have stated to us in your evidence in chief that certain members went back to the house on an hourly basis to check whether parties had returned or not.  Was Mr Deetlefs one of those people who would have been involved in that part of the operation or the preparation rather?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="322">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.  It was Mr Pienaar and Mr van Zweel.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="323">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Regarding the information that you say must have come from Mr Pienaar.  Do you have any idea what his sources would have been at that stage?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="324">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="325">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Can you tell us what specific information was given to you about Mr McFadden at the planning meeting?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="326">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, that he was a citizen of Swaziland, that he was a member of the ANC and that he was closely involved with the arrangements of safe houses.  And then I have a memory that mention was made that he had contact with government officials in the Swazi government which made a valuable person of him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="327">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>What kind of contacts would this have been with the government officials?  To do what?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="328">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Contacts, I think he said.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="329">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Oh, okay.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="330">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="331">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Would this important?  Or why was this a threat?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="332">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, in that sense, he was directly involved with the support of acts of terror in the Republic of South Africa, and he was a member of the ANC, according to that information he actively helped in the destabilisation and terrorism in the Republic of South Africa.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="333">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="334">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I did not have any contact with Brigadier Schoon with regard to targets.  It was conveyed to me by Colonel Cronje and it was only the three persons that were targeted.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="335">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="336">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="337">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="338">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Are you asking about Edward Lawrence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="339">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="340">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he said Lawrence was as active as Nyanda.  That is according to the information that he had obtained from Mr Cronje.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="341">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>(Indistinct)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="342">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="343">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Well, he said that in his overall evidence to us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="344">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="345">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="346">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="347">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="348">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>And what is the source of that information, Sir?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="349">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Once again it was security reports not only from Ermelo but from places like Piet Retief and from Middelburg that he had taken over that role, that he was once again active.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="350">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>And who would have draft those reports?  Do you have any idea?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="351">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, it would be members of the security branches.  These were field workers and they would receive that information from near sources.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="352">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Do you know who the authors of these security reports would have been that you refer to, sir?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="353">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.  I cannot recall.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="354">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="355">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Re-examination?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="356">
			<speaker>RE-EXAMINATION BY MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="357">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="358">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="359">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Is Mr Lawrence, the person who is referred to as Lawrence, the person who was killed during this operation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="360">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="361">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairman, we have no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="362">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR HATTINGH</text>
		</line>
		<line number="363">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="364">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="365">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="366">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>I get the impression that your instructions before you went out to attack these people, your instruction was to kill everyone who was there in that building, is that so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="367">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, the emphasis given by Cronje was that this group was to be obliterated and, that would be Lawrence, Nyanda and McFadden, that group.  If we had found Lawrence there, in the room or outside, we would have shot him dead, definitely.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="368">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>And when you went back to the hotel, and Mr Cronje tells you that there was a lady who was hiding somewhere in the building and she had not been killed, were you not interested to find out as to what could have been the reason why she was not killed as well?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="369">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="370">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Thank you, Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="371">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="372">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="373">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	He also asked me whether Lawrence was a source and I told him that he was not a source, that he was a very effective operative.  And he once again said that we made a terrible mistake with him as well.  And the idea that I had from this was that both had been murdered by the ANC.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="374">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>If he was telling members of the South African Police Force, that he would tell them when the comrades were asleep, that he would unlock the doors and switch off the outside light for the attack, should other policemen be telling you to murder him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="375">
			<speaker>MR DE KOCK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="376">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Have any enquiries been made to verify this ANC information...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="377">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="378">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>...as to whether he was acting for the South African Police Force at the time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="379">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="380">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="381">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is if there were other people there that night.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="382">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="383">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="384">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="385">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>He said he was as dangerous.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="386">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Referring to Lawrence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="387">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Lawrence, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="388">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="389">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="390">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Do you wish to ask any questions or are you going to investigate?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="391">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="392">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>There is reference in the other documents we were given as A this morning, Nyanda A to the Statement to the TRC, dated August 1996 where they did list McFadden as a supporter of the ANC.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="393">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Yes, my understanding was that that ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="394">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Do you want to make further enquiries and lead further reference tomorrow, you can do so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="395">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Okay.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="396">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="397">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="398" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;...was commanded by Henry Chelisa and later Thami Zulu, Zweli Nyanda and then Cyril Raymonds - Fear.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="399">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="400">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="401">
			<speaker>INTERPRETER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="402">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, in 1983.  Page 120 of the document we were given this morning, 12 May 1997 Submissions, it said that while deployed as a leading cadre in the Natal Military Machinery in Swaziland, he was arrested by the Swazi police.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="403">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, yes, there can be no doubt his status, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="404">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And he apparently gave them certain information.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="405">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="406">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Well, the enquiries I think, should be made from the Eastern Transvaal people, not from the people here today.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="407">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Well, there are some Eastern Transvaal people here.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="408">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>He must have been very lucky as well, this Mr Lawrence, not to be killed on this day.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="409">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>If I may, just for the record, honourable Chairperson, state that my problem with this is not the information as to what he might have been involved with subsequent to the operation.  It goes to the question of what the specific instruction was and who was to be eliminated.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="410">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>If what they say here is true, it seems very odd that he should have been picked as a target when he was the person who was assisting in the raid.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="411">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="412">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Or the Swazis, Swaziland police.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="413">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="414" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Subject [which is now this person] died before implementing this next enemy plan. Details below.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="415">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>So, according to the ANC, he died, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="416">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But the next plan is the raid in 1983, Deaths of Zweli Nyanda and Keith McFadden.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="417">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, all right.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="418">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>(Microphone in not on)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="419">
			<speaker>INTERPRETER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="420">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, page 122, the third paragraph on the right-hand side.  It sets out that he was the chief of communications at the same time as Zweli Nyanda was the chief of staff.  So, he was, if one can believe this at all, a very active double agent.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="421">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="422">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>