<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>F J PIENAAR</type>
	<startdate>1999-06-14</startdate>
	<location>PRETORIA</location>
	<day>13</day>
		<case>AM 5014/97</case>
						<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=53428&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/1999/9905240623_pre_990614pt.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="265">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Who do we go to now?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, the following witness is Mr Pienaar.  This is Prinsloo on the record.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker>F J PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Pienaar, you are the applicant in this matter with regard to McFadden and Zweli Nyanda.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Your application appears on page 63 and goes until page 65 of the bundle, do you have this before you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I do.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And the facts with regard to this specific case, are contained in Annexure A which goes from page 66 to 68, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And then your political background appears on page 69 and 70.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And do you confirm those sections?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And, along with this, we have documentation which you have already studied, that is Exhibit A which is the General Background to Amnesty Applications.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Do you reconcile yourself with this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Apart from the section that deals with Botswana?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Pienaar, at the time of these events, you were a warrant-officer stationed at Piet Retief.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And you were primarily involved in actions in the Eastern Transvaal and in Swaziland.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And your period of service there, in the SAP security branch, also indicated that you had to deal with certain informers.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And the persons who are referred to here as Lawrence and Lawrence Fear and so forth, was he an informer of yours?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Pienaar, did you by means of informers, gather information which had to do with Zweli Nyanda and did you provide this information to your command structure in the Eastern Transvaal and was this information then sent through to Head Office in Pretoria.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>With regard to Zweli Nyanda, did you have specific information with regard to his structure in Swaziland and his capacity there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did you provide such information to your command structure and to the Head Office?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>He was the commander of the ANC in Natal from Swaziland.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did that involve the planning of acts of terrorism in Natal?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, among others, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And in Eastern Transvaal?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>Not as much in Eastern Transvaal, Chairperson.  It also involved the insurgency of trained persons into the Republic.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Was a person by the name of McFadden known to you at that point?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>At a later stage, he became known to me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And this person called Lawrence, was he known to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he was very well known to me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And what position did he occupy in Swaziland?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>He was with Mr Nyanda and he was involved in the Natal Machinery.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And was he also one of the persons who was sought after by the security branch?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>According to information which you provided to the security police head office, is it correct that during 1983, you were given an order to report to the Oshoek border post?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And which transport did you use?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>I used my own State vehicle.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Was it a Mercedes Benz or a bakkie?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>It was a Cortina.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Was there any person who made use of a bakkie or a Mercedes Benz?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>No, there was nobody like that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did you have access along with these other person, as you have heard, with regard to the evidence of Mr de Kock, who along with Brigadier Cronje entered Swaziland?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did you enter by means of a border post?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did you use your legal passport?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="61">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I used my own legal passport.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="62">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And was this specific house in which Zweli Nyanda would have been pointed out to Brigadier Cronje?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="63">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it was pointed out to Brigadier Cronje.  I was with Deetlefs.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="64">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And Colonel Deetlefs, was he in any way involved in the planning of the attack and the obliteration of these persons in Swaziland?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="65">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>When there was nobody at the house, Mr Deetlefs went through to Ermelo but he was no longer involved in anything.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="66">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>The order and planning surrounding this action in Swaziland against this person, Zweli Nyanda, was this undertaken at a hotel in Swaziland?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="67">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="68">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And at that stage, was the planning according to your application the elimination of Zweli Nyanda and was the plan, as it appears on page 66 or your application, according to Lawrence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="69">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="70">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>What was that order?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="71">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>That the persons had to be eliminated.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="72">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And if there were other persons in the house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="73">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>They should also be taken out.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="74">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And that house, according to the information that you had, was it a house which was generally used by the ANC or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="75">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it was generally used by the ANC.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="76">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And was it clear to you that this was a transit house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="77">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="78">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="79">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Colonel De Kock was correct, it did take place that way.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="80">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And, with the action at the house itself, did you enter the house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="81">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I also entered the house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="82">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And, before you entered the house, how did you obtain access to the house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="83">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>Originally the plan was that Brigadier Cronje and Mr van Zweel would break the door open in order to obtain access.  However they could not succeed in this, Colonel De Kock moved around from his position to the door and assisted with that.  He managed to kick the door open and access was then obtained.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="84">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And, with regard to the rest of your planning after access had been obtained to the house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="85">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>I moved with Brigadier Cronje into a room where there was a person who was standing next to the wall.  It was quite dark in the room, we immediately opened fire on this person after which he fell down.  I went out of the room upon which I found Mr de Kock.  I also fired shots in the lounge after which we returned and then Colonel De Kock told me that there was blood leading to a bathroom.  He moved in that direction.  Somebody joined him there, I cannot recall who it was.  I went to another bedroom where I began to search cupboards in which I also found a number of documents which I later handed over to Brigadier Cronje.  Once again a shooting ensued, I moved outside, I found Colonel De Kock outside with a person who had collapsed on the sidewalk, the sidewalk which lead to the gate.  The person was struggling to breathe.  I shot him, I fired one shot to his head, just to ensure that he had died.  I cannot imagine that I took any form of case or briefcase from the person at that stage.  Everything was quite chaotic because things had not gone according to plan, the AKs had been used and they were not fitted with silencers and this created quite a noise.  We then left.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="86">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>The person who lay there, on the sidewalk which lead to the gate, who was that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="87">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>That was Zweli Nyanda.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="88">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Could you identify him as he lay there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="89">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I could.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="90">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>How was he known to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="91">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>He was known to me by photos and also by means of my own observation that I had undertaken on a previous occasion.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="92">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And these documents which you took from the cupboard, did you hand them over to Brigadier Cronje?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="93">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>I did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="94">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did you later receive any feedback about what the nature of those documents were?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="95">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I received feedback that there had been very important documents among those papers which contained certain plans for attacks in Natal.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="96">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, this person that you shot inside the house along with Brigadier Cronje, did you know who that person was?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="97">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, the following day I was informed that it had been Mr McFadden.  Mr McFadden was known to me by means of information, he was a known conspirator of the ANC, he was also involved in the transportation of trained MK members from Mozambique to Swaziland and from there to the RSA.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="98">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And did you notice a woman in the house at all?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="99">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>No, I did not notice any woman in the house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="100">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Just a moment, please Chairperson.  Now, Mr Pienaar, you have already given evidence that Lawrence was not an informer.  But on that specific evening, the evidence has been that a person ran away, did you have any information about who that person was?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="101">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, on the following day I received information that among others, Mr Lawrence had run away from the house.  He had been naked upon which he had run to a police station to go and report these events.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="102">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, this person who was known as Lawrence, according to a document which was submitted here, apparently by the family of Nyanda, there is a reference to the idea that Lawrence was an informer or would have given information.  Do you have any knowledge of that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="103">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>No, I have no such knowledge.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="104">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now Mr van Zweel, did he enter the house at all?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="105">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>As far as I know Mr van Zweel did not enter the house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="106">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did he fire any shots?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="107">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="108">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, at the time of this action of yours, you were a member of the South African Police Force?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="109">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="110">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And you were a member of the National Party?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="111">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="112">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And did you at that stage, act within the execution of your duties whether that be express or sworn, as a member of the South African Police?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="113">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="114">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did you, in any way, fire shots or attempt to fire shots at those persons for any financial benefit or gain?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="115">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="116">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And you are applying for the two murders of McFadden and Nyanda respectively?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="117">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="118">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And you also submit that you did not convey the true facts about the incident at that stage?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="119">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="120">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And you are also applying for malicious damage to property of the house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="121">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>Yes</text>
		</line>
		<line number="122">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Or any other omission or offence which may emanate from this situation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="123">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="124">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And for any unlawful deed which may emanate from this situation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="125">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="126">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="127">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR PRINSLOO</text>
		</line>
		<line number="128">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="129">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="130">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>And, this was the type of action where, at several other instances you were also involved with during your career?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="131">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="132">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="133">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="134">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>One may be aware of the people around or that there are other people shooting elsewhere.  You may see who it is but your attention is not drawn to the members of your unit but rather to the people whom you have to attack.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="135">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="136">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="137">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>In certain instances, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="138">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="139">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="140">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="141">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="142">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>One can almost say that at times chaos reigns because shots are fired and stun grenades are thrown and all these type of things, not true?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="143">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="144">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>This is all activities which are not progressive for reliable observation under the circumstances.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="145">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="146">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson, no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="147">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR HATTINGH</text>
		</line>
		<line number="148">
			<speaker>MR KNIGHT</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairman, similarly I have no questions on behalf of Nofomela.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="149">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR KNIGHT</text>
		</line>
		<line number="150">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Louisa Van Der Walt for the record, no questions, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="151">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MS VAN DER WALT</text>
		</line>
		<line number="152">
			<speaker>MR WAGENER</speaker>
			<text>Jan Wagener, Mr Chairman, I have no questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="153">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR WAGENER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="154">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Louis Visser, Chairperson, I have no questions, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="155">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="156">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Were you present at the hotel when this operation was planned?  We heard evidence by Mr de Kock that part of the operation was planned in Pretoria and also in Swaziland, were you present when any planning was done in Swaziland?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="157">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>I was present during the planning in Swaziland, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="158">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>Could you remember specifically who was to be wiped out in that particular house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="159">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>Our knowledge was that the house was occupied by Mr Nyanda as well as Mr Lawrence.  They would have been killed but, as well as any other person who was present in the house because it was regarded as a transit house for trained MK members to come to South Africa.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="160">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>And was Mr de Kock present when this discussion took place?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="161">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>He was present, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="162">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>Was Lawrence specifically mentioned by name to be a target, to be eliminated on that particular day?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="163">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>Definitely, Chairperson.  As I say, it was known that Mr Lawrence and Mr Nyanda occupied the house together.  He was definitely one the targets there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="164">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>So the known occupants of that particular house was Mr Nyanda and Mr Lawrence according to the information you had at that moment?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="165">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="166">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>And these two people were the people who you intended to wipe out, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="167">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="168">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>And there was a mention of a woman who was in that house at the time of the attack who was left unharmed.  Do you know anything about that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="169">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>As I have said, I did not see the woman.  I only heard later that there was a woman who was in the house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="170">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>And that you heard the debriefing meeting at the hotel, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="171">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="172">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>And can you remember who gave you the information about this woman?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="173">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="174">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>Was there any reason furnished why this woman was not killed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="175">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>No reason was furnished, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="176">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="177">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="178">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>(Indistinct)are you asking whether he raised the question at this meeting?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="179">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>Certainly, Chairperson.  Why was this...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="180">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And to why the person...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="181">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="182">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>I did not ask anybody why she was left out, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="183">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="184">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>Because I did not see the woman, and I did not ask any questions about her.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="185">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>You also mentioned that you subsequently learned that a person ran away from that house and you later learned that that person could be Lawrence, did I get you correctly?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="186">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.  I knew that somebody had run away from the house and the following day I established that it was indeed Mr Lawrence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="187">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>And did you see this person running away?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="188">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>I did not see him, Chairperson because I was inside the house.  I could not see what was going on outside from where I was.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="189">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>And who told you of this person running away?  That there was somebody who ran away?  Can you remember?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="190">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>It was later discussed at the hotel and, as I say, the following morning, I established that it was Mr Lawrence who had run away from the house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="191">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="192">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="193">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>Excuse me, Mr Mohlaba.  How were you able to establish on the following morning that the person who ran away was Lawrence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="194">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>It was in co-operation with the Swaziland police where we discovered that it was Mr Lawrence who arrived at the police station and told them about an attack on a house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="195">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Mohlaba.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="196">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="197">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>Maybe let me take this opportunity.  Mr Pienaar, the person who was your informer, without mentioning his nationality, was he staying in Swaziland or was that person staying the Republic of South Africa?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="198">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>He lived in Swaziland, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="199">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="200">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Just one thing which did not sound very clear to me, you say the Swaziland police told you that the person who had escaped was Lawrence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="201">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="202">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>How did they communicate that information to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="203">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>Telephonically, Chairperson.  I called a person who informed me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="204">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Was that person a member of the Swaziland police, I take it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="205">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>He was a member of the police, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="206">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>How would you describe the relationship and the Swaziland police and the SA police where you were stationed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="207">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>I would say it was very good, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="208">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Would it have gone as far as the South African security police having informers within the ranks of the Swaziland police?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="209">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>It is indeed so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="210">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>This person you were contacting from the Swaziland police, in what capacity was he or she talking to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="211">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>As a friend.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="212">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Was he or she your informer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="213">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson, it was an acquaintance of mine which I built up with some time but, it was not a source.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="214">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Thank you, Mr Mohlaba.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="215">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.  There was a mention of some planning having been done in Pretoria.  Were you part of the Pretoria planning or you only participated in the second part in Swaziland?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="216">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>I only participated in Swaziland, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="217">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>Could you remember who provided information about the exact location of the house where this attack was to be carried out?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="218">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>Colonel Deetlefs pointed this house out to myself and Colonel Cronje.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="219">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>And, do you by any chance know how the Colonel got that information?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="220">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>No, unfortunately I do not.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="221">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="222">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR MOHLABA</text>
		</line>
		<line number="223">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Ramula Patel.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="224">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Sir, can you tell us at the meeting in Swaziland where you were present, the planning meeting, how many targets were specifically identified?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="225">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>There were two persons, namely Mr Nyanda and Mr Lawrence.  And as well as any other person who might have been in the house.  It could not be determined how many people there would be, it might have been four or five but, mention was made specifically of Mr Nyanda and Mr Lawrence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="226">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="227">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="228">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>All right, yes.  No, then I misunderstood his evidence.  Sorry, I withdraw that.  Was there any mention made of Mr McFadden at that planning meeting?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="229">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>As far as I know, no.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="230">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>The information about Mr McFadden, according to your memory, was that only gained after the operation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="231">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairperson, it was known that Mr McFadden was a conspirator and assisted the ANC but, after the operation I heard that Mr McFadden had indeed been killed in the house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="232">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="233">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="234">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>And your information about Lawrence, was that conveyed to Brigadier Cronje?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="235">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>All information which was received was sent through the correct channels to head office and, amongst others, Brigadier Cronje might have had insight to this information.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="236">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="237">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>I was not present when Brigadier Cronje gave evidence so I would not know.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="238">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="239">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="240">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="241">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="242">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Or  questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="243">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MS PATEL</text>
		</line>
		<line number="244">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Re-examination?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="245">
			<speaker>RE-EXAMINATION BY MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="246">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	You in the reports that you sent up mentioned Lawrence in the report.  The report that was sent to Eastern Transvaal which was sent through to Head Office.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="247">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="248">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>No further questions, thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="249">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR PRINSLOO</text>
		</line>
		<line number="250">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>In your application you say, at page 68, paragraph 7</text>
		</line>
		<line number="251" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="252">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="253">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Can you remember where you got that information from?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="254">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>This was through information which several sources conveyed as well as later persons who were arrested and how were interrogated who gave us this information.  I was never certain thereof.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="255">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>It is quite clear from the document we got and from what you learnt that the ANC suspected him of being the traitor, a double agent.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="256">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="257">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>One other matter, we have had it in other applications as I think you have raised it again here.  Was the position that if you raided a transit house, you had to expect that there would be armed men in it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="258">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text>That was always the case.  Any attack which was launched at a base or a transit house, it would be expected that the occupants will be armed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="259">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="260">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="261">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And that was the normal practice either way?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="262">
			<speaker>MR PIENAAR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="263">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>No questions, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="264">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>(Microphone not switched on) We will adjourn till 9h30 tomorrow morning.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="265">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>