<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY HEARINGS</type>
	<startdate>1999-06-15</startdate>
	<location>PRETORIA</location>
	<day>14</day>
	<names>J E W VAN ZWEEL</names>
	<case>5017/97</case>
	<matter>MURDER OF K McFADDEN AND Z NYANDA</matter>
					<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=53430&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/1999/9905240623_pre_990615pt.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="362">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>The next applicant is Mr van Zweel, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Honourable Chairperson, if I may just at this point.  I indicated yesterday that there might be one or two extra things that I would like to put to Mr de Kock.  I&#039;m not sure whether we should do that now or proceed.  It was just basically relating to Brigadier Cronje&#039;s version to us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Well I think we&#039;re all in your hands.  Is it likely to be anything that people would want other witnesses to deal with?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>No, not really.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Well what do you suggest?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>We have no objection to him being recalled at any stage, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Well I think we&#039;ll deal with Mr van Zweel.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>J E W VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mr van Zweel, you are the applicant in this matter and you have applied for amnesty with regard to this incident which had taken place in Swaziland, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Your application appears on page 77 to 79, this is the written part.  And the facts appear as Annexure A, from pages 80 to 82, and then the political background appears as Annexure B, from page 83 to page 90.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mr van Zweel, you have also had insight to the general background, which forms part of Exhibit A of these proceedings, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And do you reconcile yourself therewith, except for the parts that have regard to Lesotho and Botswana?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mr van Zweel, on page 80 of your application, the second paragraph, the fourth line.  In the second paragraph you say</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Brigadier Cronje and Colonel E de Kock arrived at our office at Ermelo.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, yes - no, Chairperson, it was our office at Oshoek.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>So you ask that it be amended, that is was the sub-office of Ermelo at Oshoek.  Do you otherwise confirm the correctness of your application?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I do, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mr van Zweel, you have heard the evidence of Mr de Kock, as well as that of your colleague, the other applicant Mr Pienaar.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>That you had rendezvoused at Oshoek and later at a hotel in Swaziland received orders from Brigadier Cronje.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And what was the instruction at the hotel?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That we had to go to a certain house in Swaziland and eliminate Mr Nyanda and Mr Lawrence and all other persons who were in the house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>At that stage you were a member of the Security Branch, as a Warrant Officer stationed at Ermelo, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Was the person, Mr Zweli Nyanda - in the investigations which you done, was he known to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And the person known as Lawrence, was he ever mentioned to you or was he known to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he was known to me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And both those persons were members of the ANC.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>This particular evening, what would your duty be at this house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>I would go along with Brigadier Cronje and open the front door, but we could not succeed.  Colonel de Kock came around, kicked the door open and they moved in.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did you enter the house yourself?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>No, I went around the corner and stood at a door.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did you fire any shots in the house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>No, I did not fire any shots, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did you hear that shots were fired inside the house and in the vicinity of the house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did you see that a person ran away from the house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And in the position where you found yourself, was it possible that the person could run away and that you could not observe?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And in this action, did you hear later that persons were killed or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson</text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And who were those people?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>It was Mr Nyanda and Mr McFadden.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And later, did anybody convey to you that a person had escaped from there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And who was that person?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That was Mr Lawrence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And who gave that information to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>Mr Pienaar told me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Was any information conveyed to you that this person Lawrence at a later stage, according to the ANC, was regarded as a spy?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="61">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Who told you this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="62">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>Mr Pienaar told me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="63">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Pienaar at the time of this incident was stationed at Piet Retief.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="64">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it is a sub-branch of Ermelo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="65">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>You went out on one specific evening after this incident, did you reconcile yourself with the fact that you are making yourself guilty of murder, the murder of Nyanda and McFadden?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="66">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="67">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And did you also realise that by entering Swaziland, and that you were in possession of arms which were issued to you for an &quot;illegal purpose&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="68">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="69">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And at the time of this operation, did you act as a member of the South African Police, did you act as such?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="70">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="71">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And did you believe that your action was within your powers?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="72">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="73">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And at that stage you were a member of the National Party?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="74">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="75">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>At the time of this action, did you act to protect the government and the National Party, who were the government?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="76">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="77">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did you receive any benefit from this operation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="78">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>No, I did not, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="79">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And you acted under the instructions of Brigadier Cronje?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="80">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="81">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="82">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR PRINSLOO</text>
		</line>
		<line number="83">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson, Hattingh on record.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="84">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr van Zweel, I assume that there were no lights switched on in the house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="85">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="86">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Can you recall whether there were any street lamps in the vicinity of the house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="87">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>There was a dull street lamp on the one side, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="88">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>But once you moved into the house, it must have been dark?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="89">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="90">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>And things happened very quickly.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="91">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="92">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Shots were fired with automatic weapons?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="93">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="94">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>And just for the record, an automatic weapon, once you pull the trigger it shoots continuously and it could empty a magazine within a few seconds?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="95">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="96">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>And you don&#039;t have any control as long as you press the trigger down, you don&#039;t have any control as to the amount of shots that you fire?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="97">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="98">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>What weapon were you armed with, Mr van Zweel?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="99">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>I had a Scorpion.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="100">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>You heard that Mr de Kock said that this was a weapon of small calibre and it does not have great velocity.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="101">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="102">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Mr de Kock&#039;s recollection was that you went into the house and fired shots with this Scorpion.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="103">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>I did not go into the house, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="104">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Did you fire any shots with the Scorpion?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="105">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>None at all, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="106">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>So the whole night you did not fire a single shot?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="107">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>I didn&#039;t fire any shots, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="108">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>After the incident, Mr van Zweel, did you go back to the hotel?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="109">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="110">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>And there was some kind of reflection held there, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="111">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>It was very quick, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="112">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Was it then known who were the persons that were killed in the house, the other person, Mr McFadden?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="113">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>No, it was only that - Mr Nyanda I saw when I went to the street side where the cars were parked.  Mr Nyanda lay close to where the cars were, he was already dead then.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="114">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>And some of the other members and the group in general, did they not report that another person had been killed in the house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="115">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>Mention was made that another person was shot, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="116">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>But none of you at that stage knew who it was?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="117">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>No, we did not know who it was.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="118">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>When did you find out who this person was?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="119">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>Later the following day we heard who this person was.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="120">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Where were you when you heard this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="121">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>I was at the office.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="122">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>The office, in which town?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="123">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>In Ermelo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="124">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>And if I understand you correctly, Ermelo is the headquarters of the Security Branch in that area, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="125">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="126">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Piet Retief was a sub-branch thereof, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="127">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="128">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>And which was the one that you were attached to?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="129">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>Oshoek.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="130">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Oshoek.  Is Oshoek also a sub-branch of Ermelo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="131">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="132">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>There where you heard in Ermelo - I mean you say you heard this from Mr Pienaar?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="133">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="134">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Were any other security policemen present who had participated in the action when Mr Pienaar told you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="135">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>No, it was late that afternoon, it was only myself and Mr Pienaar.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="136">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Did you have an opportunity later to work with Mr de Kock, after that incident?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="137">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="138">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Is it possible that at a later stage when you worked together you might have discussed the Nyanda matter and that mention was made that Mr McFadden was killed during that incident?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="139">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>I cannot recall anything like that, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="140">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>This incident took place 16 years ago and one&#039;s memory might be vague, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="141">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson, it was a long time ago.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="142">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson, no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="143">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR HATTINGH</text>
		</line>
		<line number="144">
			<speaker>MR KNIGHT</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, Julian Knight on behalf of implicated person, Nofomela.  No questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="145">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR KNIGHT</text>
		</line>
		<line number="146">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Louisa van der Walt.  No questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="147">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MS VAN DER WALT</text>
		</line>
		<line number="148">
			<speaker>MR WAGENER</speaker>
			<text>Jan Wagener, Mr Chairman.  No questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="149">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR WAGENER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="150">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Visser on record, Mr Chairman.  I have no questions to this witness, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="151">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR VISSER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="152">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>B Mohlaba on record.  I&#039;ve got a few questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="153">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr van Zweel, at the time of this incident you were stationed at Ermelo, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="154">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="155">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>And you mentioned that Brigadier van Zyl and Mr de Kock arrived at the Oshoek office, which was a branch office, did I get you correctly?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="156">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="157">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>No, not van Zyl, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="158">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>It was not Mr van Zyl, it was Mr Cronje.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="159">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  And this meeting, was it arranged or did they arrive without notifying you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="160">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>They arrived there at Oshoek and from Oshoek we went to a hotel in Swaziland.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="161">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>My question was, was there a prior arrangement that you&#039;re going to meet at Oshoek, then move to a hotel, or was it just, it just happened without any prior arrangement?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="162">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>No, we were told to go to Oshoek and from Oshoek we took our car, we left Mr Rorich&#039;s car at Oshoek and we went along with Mr Pienaar to the hotel in Swaziland.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="163">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>And can you tell us who told you to go to Oshoek?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="164">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>We just received instructions from our commander to go to Oshoek.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="165">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>And who is this commander?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="166">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>Our commander was Mr Deetlefs at Ermelo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="167">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>Was any reason furnished to you why you should go to Oshoek and who you were to meet there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="168">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>It was told to us that we will receive an instruction there as soon as all of us were there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="169">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>And you subsequently moved to a hotel in Swaziland, do you remember the name of the hotel?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="170">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>Is it necessary for me to mention the hotel&#039;s name?  I can, it&#039;s the Yensan Hotel in Swaziland.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="171">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>And how many of you were at the hotel at that moment?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="172">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>Everybody that was named here, Brigadier Cronje, Mr de Kock, Mr Pienaar, Mr van Dyk, Mr Rorich, myself and two Askaris.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="173">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>And this - rather let me put it differently.  Did you know of the existence of Zweli Nyanda and did you know of his activities before you were told to go to Oshoek?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="174">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>I did, because I was stationed at the Security Branch in Ermelo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="175">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>And what did you know about him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="176">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That he was the Commander of the Natal Machinery.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="177">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>And before you moved to the hotel, there was no, you received no instructions or you did not view him as somebody who should be eliminated.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="178">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>Discussions took place in the hotel in Swaziland.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="179">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>And after this ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="180">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mohlaba, I thought you were asking him if he viewed Mr Nyanda as a person who should be killed, before the discussion took place, but I&#039;m not sure if he answered your question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="181">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Before this discussion, Mr van Zweel, did you view Mr Nyanda as someone who should be killed for his activities?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="182">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="183">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>And after this operation was conducted, did all of you go back to the hotel?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="184">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>Please repeat that question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="185">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>After the operation was launched, did you go back to the hotel?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="186">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="187">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>And that everybody who was involved in this operation went back to the hotel.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="188">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="189">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>Did you hold any discussions, that is discussions ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="190">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>We immediately prepared and we departed and we went through the fence at Oshoek.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="191">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>There was no discussion about the operation itself?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="192">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>Not as far as I can recall, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="193">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>And just tell us, when to the hotel, did you go to different rooms or were you all in one place, all of you who came for the operation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="194">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>As far as I can recall, we were all together in one room.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="195">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>So if there were any discussions which were engaged in, you would have been quite aware that there were certain things that were discussed, is that not so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="196">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="197">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>Don&#039;t you remember a mention having been made of a lady who was inside the house, who was not killed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="198">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>No, that I only heard later.  As I said Chairperson, I did not know that there was a woman in the house.  At a later stage I heard.  I can&#039;t remember whether it was a day or two afterwards that we heard that there was a woman in the house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="199">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>And do you remember who you heard that from?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="200">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>I cannot recall, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="201">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>And did you not hear this at the hotel?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="202">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="203">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>And about the person who is escaped, did you hear anything about that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="204">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>This I only heard later from Mr Pienaar.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="205">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>And when late, was it at the hotel or at ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="206">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>No, it was after the hotel.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="207">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>...(indistinct) when you were back in South Africa?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="208">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="209">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>And where was this discussion held?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="210">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>If I recall correctly, it was at Oshoek or at Ermelo.  I cannot recall precisely I heard that the man had escaped, because everything took place very quickly.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="211">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I mean your discussion where it was brought to your knowledge that there&#039;s somebody who escaped.  Where was - was that held at Ermelo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="212">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="213">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>Where precisely in Ermelo was it, at a police station?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="214">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>At our offices, at the security offices in Ermelo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="215">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>And that was brought to your attention when you were discussing this operation, or can you just explain to us how was this thing brought to your attention.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="216">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>We discussed it there in the office.  I cannot recall correctly, it has been many years ago.  I cannot recall correctly how it came about that it was mentioned, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="217">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>And can you recall the number of person who were present when this was brought to your attention, was it the two of you or was somebody else present?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="218">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>It could only have been the two of us, nobody else was there.  I don&#039;t know, I cannot recall.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="219">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>As far as you can recall, was there a forum where this operation or the success thereof was discussed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="220">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson, I can&#039;t recall.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="221">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>And these weapons which were used to carry out this attack, did you carry them from South Africa on the night or day when you passed through the border gate to Swaziland?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="222">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>Please repeat that question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="223">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>The weapons which were used to carry out this operation, did you have, were they conveyed from South Africa into Swaziland on the day or the night when you passed through to the hotel in Swaziland?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="224">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>I think Mr de Kock explained that, that the weapons were hidden.  I don&#039;t know where it was hidden and how it got there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="225">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>So the weapons were only supplied to you when you arrived in Swaziland, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="226">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, yes Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="227">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>Where exactly in Swaziland were they distributed to you, whilst you were in the hotel?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="228">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>At the Yensan Hotel.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="229">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>If the Chairperson can bear with me.  Thank you, Chairperson, I&#039;ve got no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="230">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR MOHLABA</text>
		</line>
		<line number="231">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Sir.  It&#039;s Ramula Patel on record.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="232">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Sir, regarding Mr McFadden - or before we get to Mr McFadden, what were your general duties at that time, not in respect of this specific operation, but your general duties?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="233">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>My work?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="234">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="235">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>I operated in Swaziland as well as a security policeman, gathering of intelligence for the South African Government, and I handled sources in Swaziland as well.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="236">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  So did you assist Mr Pienaar in the gathering of information for this operation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="237">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>Mr Pienaar and I worked together at many times.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="238">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  The question was, did you assist Mr Pienaar in the gathering of information for this operation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="239">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="240">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  Regarding Mr McFadden, given that you were working in that area at the time, what information did you have about him, prior to the operation, if any?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="241">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>Mr McFadden?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="242">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="243">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That he transported people from Maputo to Swaziland and from Swaziland to Natal.  He was a courier and a collaborator with the ANC.  That is the information we had from our several sources, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="244">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  And this was prior to the operation? This information you had available to you was information prior to the operation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="245">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="246">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  From your information, were you aware that Mr McFadden might have been living with Mr Nyanda, at that time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="247">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>No, I was not aware of that, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="248">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  At the planning meeting at the Swaziland Hotel, was there any discussion about Mr McFadden?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="249">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>None, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="250">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Okay, well that&#039;s in fact what Brigadier Cronje says as well.  He says the information that they had or that you all had at that stage was that Nyanda was to be eliminated and that the chances were great that Cecil would be with him because, given that they had been observed for a long period of time, whenever they were followed they knew that Cecil would be with Nyanda.  Would you confirm that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="251">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="252">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  Now do you have idea - this information that Brigadier Cronje says about Mr Nyanda being followed for quite some time and that he was held under observation, do you know where that information would have come from?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="253">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson, the information - if I can it in the following, the information would have come from reports from Ermelo, from Piet Retief to Head Office.  That is the only way in which he could have got that information, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="254">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Do you have any idea how Mr McFadden was subsequently identified as the person who had been killed in the house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="255">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>Please repeat the question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="256">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Do you have any idea how Mr McFadden was subsequently identified as the second person who was killed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="257">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>I cannot say, it must have been from the Swazis, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="258">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>But you had a discussion with Mr Pienaar about this, not so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="259">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Mr Pienaar said that the Swazis had confirmed this, so it must have come from the Swazi Police, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="260">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  Do you have any knowledge of Mr McFadden&#039;s brother, Gavin? - Mr Keith McFadden&#039;s brother, Gavin.  Does it ring a bell to you, do you know whether he was being investigated or observed by you, whether you had any information on him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="261">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t know, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="262">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>When you say you don&#039;t know, as you saying that you can&#039;t recall or it&#039;s possible, it&#039;s not possible, what are you saying, Sir?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="263">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>It&#039;s a long while ago and I cannot recall it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="264">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>You cannot recall it.  Okay, fine.  Subsequent to the operation, did you or any of the group go back to the Nyanda house, not immediately after, but some time after?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="265">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>After the attack?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="266">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="267">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>No, I was never there again, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="268">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>My instructions are that the parents of Mr McFadden, of the late Mr Keith McFadden, had stated that from some time after the operation had taken place, that white men in a vehicle with a South African registration plate had driven around the area and had made enquiries about where the family was, where the rest of the family was.  Do you bear any knowledge of this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="269">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I bear no knowledge of</text>
		</line>
		<line number="270">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>that. </text>
		</line>
		<line number="271">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  And you say you weren&#039;t in the house where Mr McFadden was killed, you never entered the house at any stage?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="272">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="273">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  And can I just ask this, there&#039;s a curious feature about all these, well the majority of the applications that we have, that they&#039;re all worded almost identically except for a couple of sentences towards the end that are different, did you have a discussion with your co-applicants prior to the filling in of this application?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="274">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>No, we simply consulted our attorneys and they took statements from us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="275">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>And so you can&#039;t explain why your statements are all the same?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="276">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Well Chairperson, that&#039;s not quite correct, it&#039;s not all the applicants.  I think  ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="277">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>With respect ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="278">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I think Ms Patel referred to the particular applicants that she&#039;s referring to, certainly the application of this witness is not identical to the that of Brigadier Schoon&#039;s, for example.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="279">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>I said the most, Honourable Chairperson, I didn&#039;t say all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="280">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I might be able to rectify the matter.  We consulted collectively with our attorneys and it may be that some of the things may have been compiled more-or-less the same.  We read our affidavits and we were satisfied with our statements and we undersigned them.  That&#039;s the only explanation that I can offer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="281">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Sorry Sir, did you say that you all consulted together, that there weren&#039;t individual consultations about this incident?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="282">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>No, we consulted with our advocates one by one and made our statements.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="283">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Well then it&#039;s indeed curious that they&#039;re all phrased in exactly the same words, almost.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="284">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Well who is &quot;we&quot;?  Because there seem to be a fair selection of attorneys and advocates representing applicants.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="285">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>It is the group of us and the two of us, that&#039;s me and Mr Pienaar, Mr Rorich and Mr van Dyk.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="286">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  You say that Mr Deetlefs had given you the instruction to meet prior to going to Swaziland, not so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="287">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>Mr Deetlefs gave me the instruction that me and Mr Rorich had to depart for Oshoek and that we had to go to our office at Oshoek.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="288">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Did you report back to Mr Deetlefs when you got back?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="289">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>I believe that Brigadier Cronje had already done that, because he was the commander.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="290">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Are you assuming that Sir, or do you know that for a fact?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="291">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m going according to seniority and I believe that Brigadier Cronje would have conveyed the entire story to Deetlefs.  I cannot say that because I wouldn&#039;t know that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="292">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Okay.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="293">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Deetlefs was in Swaziland with you, wasn&#039;t he, pointing out the house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="294">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, he was there and then he departed back immediately because he had other matters to attend to.  He did not remain in Swaziland.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="295">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Do you bear any knowledge on a raid by the Swaziland Police on the Nyanda house a day or two prior to your operation being carried out?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="296">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>No, none whatsoever.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="297">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Honourable Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="298">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MS PATEL</text>
		</line>
		<line number="299">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Mr van Zweel, just one thing.  When you say when you saw this person who was lying outside there, you recognised him as Mr Nyanda, how did you know, had you seen him before?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="300">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>I knew him very well.  I knew his photo, I&#039;d seen it almost every day of my life, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="301">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Is there any reason why you did not take part in the shooting like everyone?  I understand you were standing outside.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="302">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, there was nobody on that one side and I was afraid that somebody would jump through the door that had been kicked open and if he escaped through that, which was possible because there were many people inside the house.  That is why I took my position up at the corner of the house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="303">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Sorry.  Thank you for that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="304">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Mohlaba and Ms Patel, is there any independent corroboration of this allegation about a woman who was hiding somewhere in the house?  Has that been confirmed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="305">
			<speaker>MR MOHLABA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  Certainly Chairperson, we have been given the telephone numbers of this woman.  She is in Durban and she can only be contacted after eleven, so during the adjournment we will try and call her.  But the information is that indeed there was a woman who was, she was shot on the leg.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="306">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="307">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>Mr van Zweel, if you may help me here.  When crossing the - when visiting Swaziland, were you supposed to apply for a visa, explaining exactly where in Swaziland you were going?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="308">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>No, we just used the usual passport, you didn&#039;t need a visa for Swaziland.  And our people who usually visited Swaziland and went through the border post regularly, had an extended period of time to enter and to exit, for example two to four weeks, and all you had to do was sign your name in the book, with your passport number and provide the registration number of the vehicle that you were travelling in.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="309">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>You said you were working from inside Swaziland, gathering information.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="310">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="311">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>Now on the night of the operation, did you also return together with the team just through the border, not at the border post?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="312">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>No, it was over the border fence because the border post had already been closed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="313">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>Then your passport will show a stamp that you are still in Swaziland, how would you then return to Swaziland, because they said you are supposed to be inside not outside Swaziland?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="314">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I&#039;ve already explained that we had stamps in our passports that we could travel back and forth, that we didn&#039;t have to stop at the customs office all the time, we just had to sign our names in a book.  Now I don&#039;t know whether they kept a proper record of the book to determine who was entering and exiting, I don&#039;t know how the Swazis operated in that respect.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="315">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, no further questions, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="316">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Re-examination?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="317">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, before that happens, something has arisen which prompts one question on my part, if you will allow me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="318">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr van Zweel, you said that you yourself did not regard Mr Nyanda as a target to be killed before the incident, if I understand you correctly.  Is that correct?  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="319">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>Are you saying that I did not regard him as a target?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="320">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, you examined by Mr Mohlaba: &quot;Did you regard Mr Zweli Nyanda as a person who had to be killed, before this operation or this incident.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="321">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>Then I answered &quot;no&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="322">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, your answer was no.  Thus, you deny that Mr Zweli Nyanda was a target of the Security Police?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="323">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="324">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>You would not deny it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="325">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="326">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, and then perhaps in reply to Mr Sandi&#039;s question, this little extract from the further submissions of May 1997, which you have before you, at page 121, regarding the lady in the house, this is a report on the raid and it&#039;s in inverted commas, where the person says</text>
		</line>
		<line number="327" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I emerged, I then went to the house.  I saw Zweli lying near the gate ...&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="328">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m reading from the fourth paragraph on the right-hand side at page 121.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="329" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;... and Marcel checked his pulse.  He confirmed he was dead.  I enquired after Fikile ...&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="330">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>That appears to be the lady, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="331" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;... and was told that she had been heard by the neighbours after the enemy had left, asking for assistance, which she was denied and left.  I then left with Marcel for the police, where I found Fikile.  I reported the attack to the policeman on duty.  I made my way back to the house with Marcel.  I saw Keith with a bullet wound in his head, crouched in a corner.  It was clear that he was dead.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="332">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>And then he says:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="333" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;His travelling back with the reports had been taken by the Boers.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="334">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>So there seems to be confirmation of the lady in the house, from that as well.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="335">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Well I have grave doubts as to what value one can attach to statements made by this gentleman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="336">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, well yes.  But it just provides additional information about the lady.  That&#039;s really all.  Thank you, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="337">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Before that, I&#039;m afraid I didn&#039;t quite catch the last of the answer of your question, could you put it again?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="338">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>My question to Mr van Zweel?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="339">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="340">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Mr van Zweel, I want to put it to you that as other leaders of MK operated from neighbouring states, Mr Zweli Nyanda was indeed a person who was a target, in the sense that he was somebody about whom information had been gathered and it appeared that he was somebody who was a target for murder.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="341">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="342">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR VISSER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="343">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>From the evidence we have heard, it would appear that he was someone who was very actively engaged in the freedom struggle.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="344">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="345">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Can you remember if, when you arrived at the house that evening, somebody came out of the house and spoke to you or any of your group?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="346">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="347">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>It didn&#039;t happen?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="348">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="349">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And, I don&#039;t know if you can tell me or if we should wait to hear from your counsel later, these firearms that you had, they were issued to you as a member of the South African Police Force, is that correct, by an officer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="350">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="351">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="352">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>Did you know anything about this Lawrence while you were working in Swaziland, his activities and the like?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="353">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>As I have already stated, Mr Chairperson, we knew everything about Mr Lawrence&#039;s movements and activities.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="354">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>Was he by any chance a source for the police?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="355">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZWEEL</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="356">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="357">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="358">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>That concludes the witnesses I intend calling, Mr Chairman.  My colleague will now proceed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="359">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
		<line number="360">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Well looking at my watch, should we proceed now or should we take the adjournment now and allow her to proceed uninterruptedly after the adjournment?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="361">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>I think we should take the adjournment, Mr Chairman.  Thank you, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="362">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>