<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY HEARINGS</type>
	<startdate>1999-08-04</startdate>
	<location>PRETORIA</location>
	<day>3</day>
	<names>JAKOB FRANCOIS KOK</names>
							<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=53599&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/1999/99080205_pre_990804pt.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="56">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Jacob Francois Kok, 48 to 56, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>JACOB FRANCOIS KOK</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Kok, you have your amnesty application before you and it appears on page 48, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>MR KOK</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Do you confirm with regard to 7(a) and 7(b), that you were a supporter of the National Party?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker>MR KOK</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Once again, Chairperson, may we request that amendment?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I take it there&#039;s no objection.  Paragraph 7(b) and 7(b) as they appear on page 48 of volume 1, will be amended by deleting the letters &quot;NVT&quot; in both paragraphs and substituting in paragraph (a) with the words National Party or &quot;Nasionale Party&quot; and in 7(b) the word &quot;Ondersteuner&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Do you confirm the contents of your application?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>MR KOK</speaker>
			<text>I confirm it as correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>You have heard the evidence of Mr Wal du Toit?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>MR KOK</speaker>
			<text>I have, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>And do you confirm that you were in the same position as your other colleagues, that you were never able to evaluate the merits of the situation because the background was not available to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>MR KOK</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>And through the years when you modified arms, you modified these arms with the belief that it would be used in the struggle against the opposition to the then government?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>MR KOK</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson, I confirm so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>And in this instance, were you aware that the probable application of the arms would be illegal, but were you at peace that the application would be morally justifiable?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker>MR KOK</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson, the application by the other side.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>And you also apply for amnesty for any offence or delict which might flow from your involvement with this incident, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>MR KOK</speaker>
			<text>I do so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>And you confirm the correctness of the rest of your application?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>MR KOK</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I do, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>CHAIRPERSON:   Thank you, Mr Booyens.  Mr Hattingh, any questions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>No, thank you, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR HATTINGH</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Cornelius?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>I have no questions, thank you, Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR CORNELIUS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Visser?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Nor do I, thank you, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR VISSER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mafora?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR MAFORA</speaker>
			<text>Just one question, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Do you perhaps know how many handgrenades were prepared?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker>MR KOK</speaker>
			<text>For this specific incident?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker>MR MAFORA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>MR KOK</speaker>
			<text>No, it&#039;s impossible to remember because I could not isolate it over the years which we worked.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker>MR MAFORA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR MAFORA</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Ms Lockhat?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker>MS LOCKHAT</speaker>
			<text>No questions, thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MS LOCKHAT</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I take it there&#039;s not re-examination?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Not.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO RE-EXAMINATION BY MR BOOYENS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Adv Gcabashe, Mr Malan?  Thank you, Mr Kok, that concludes your testimony.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker>MR KOK</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, with regard to Mr Kobus Kok, on page 30, I don&#039;t know if the people are ashamed to say that they were supporters of the National Party, because not one of the applicants do that.  I don&#039;t know whether you find it necessary to recall him about that, but I would ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t think it&#039;s necessary, we&#039;ve been explained why we&#039;ve got this &quot;NVT&quot; instead of the statement that they were supporters of the National Party.  I take it as the same.  So we&#039;ll amend that application as well.  On page 30 of volume 1, 7(a) to read &quot;Nasionale Party&quot; and 7(b) to read &quot;Ondersteuner&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Booyens.  That concludes the evidence of the applicants that I appear for, Mr Chairman.  May I ask whether there&#039;s any objection if those of them - they&#039;ve got other employment and so on, if those of them who wish to leave may be excused from further attendance?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Would there be any objection to that?  Certainly, if they wish to leave they may do so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MACHINE SWITCHED OFF</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>