<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY HEARINGS</type>
	<startdate>1999-08-11</startdate>
	<location>DURBAN</location>
	<day>2</day>
	<names>A E VERWEY</names>
	<case>AM5018/97</case>
						<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=53606&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/1999/9908100903_dbn_990811db.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="63">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>ON RESUMPTION</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Nel?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairman.  The application in front of you is that of Mr Verwey.  It is found in the Cele bundle on page 168, and in front of you I&#039;ve had placed a short summary of the evidence.  If we can possibly mark that Exhibit - I think the next on is G.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>G, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>Mr Verwey will be testifying in Afrikaans.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker>A E VERWEY</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, you may be seated.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Verwey, you are applying in terms of the Act for amnesty, for your involvement in the abduction of the case that we have heard here, that would be Dion Cele, and any other offence which may emanate therefrom.  Is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>MR VERWEY</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>You have heard the evidence of the previous applicants who have testified and you have also had the opportunity to peruse Exhibit A, do you confirm the correctness of that exhibit as well as the evidence given by the previous applicants regarding your involvement?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>MR VERWEY</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>Mr Verwey, during this incident you were stationed in the SAP at Middelburg.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>MR VERWEY</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>You were at the Security Branch, and what was your involvement there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>MR VERWEY</speaker>
			<text>I was a Warrant Officer for the Security Branch.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>And am I correct in saying that Col Taylor from the Durban Security Branch during this time contacted you to assist in an operation which would take place in Swaziland?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker>MR VERWEY</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>Now why would he have approached you specifically?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>MR VERWEY</speaker>
			<text>We worked in Swaziland regularly and we knew the roads and the environment very well.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>Now as I&#039;ve said, you have heard the evidence of the previous applicants and your involvement in this operation was exclusively to offer assistance with a possible, if I may call it, escape route from Swaziland to the RSA.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>MR VERWEY</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>You say, or you summarise the incident on page 172 of your application and that this is correct, with the exception that you mentioned in your application that Sam du Preez was also one of the members who was present during this operation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker>MR VERWEY</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>Am I correct in saying that during consultation and in consultation with Mr du Preez, it appeared clearly that you were mistaken and that he was not involved at all in this operation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker>MR VERWEY</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>Furthermore, you summarise your political objective on page 174 in question 10(a) of your application.  Do you confirm the correctness thereof and request that this be incorporated in your application?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker>MR VERWEY</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>Mr Verwey, do you ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>When you say 174, page 174 ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>Of the bundle.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Of the bundle?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And this is question 10(a), which paragraph, paragraph 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, all of them?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>All of them, Mr Chairperson.  That is the ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>Did you draw any financial benefit or reward from your participation in this operation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>MR VERWEY</speaker>
			<text>No, not at all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>After Cele had been taken from Swaziland, did you participate in any way in the interrogation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker>MR VERWEY</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>And you and Labuschagne then returned to your station?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker>MR VERWEY</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, that is the evidence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR NEL</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Mr Visser, are there any questions you with to put?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I have no questions, thank you, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Is there any cross-examination at all?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker>MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chair, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MS THABETHE</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So the limit of your participation is to get this man out of Swaziland and when you got back into the country that was the end of your participation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker>MR VERWEY</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Just one question, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Did you have any inkling about what might happen to this man after you left the scene?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker>MR VERWEY</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>I see in paragraph 9 of your application that you have applied for conspiracy to abduct.  Where you indeed a member of the planning or were you just told to be there so that you could indicate roads?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker>MR VERWEY</speaker>
			<text>We were there because we knew the routes and the environment very well.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>But you were aware that this person was going to be abducted?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker>MR VERWEY</speaker>
			<text>Yes, we knew this before the time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Thank you, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="61">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, thank you very much.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="62">
			<speaker>MR VERWEY</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="63">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>