<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY HEARINGS</type>
	<startdate>1999-08-27</startdate>
	<location>PRETORIA</location>
	<day>9</day>
	<names>BEN BURGER VAN ZYL</names>
							<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=53652&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/1999/99081631_pre_990827pt.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="342">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>ON RESUMPTION</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr van Zyl, would you switch on your microphone please, and give your full names for the record.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker>BEN BURGER VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, you may be seated.   Mr Lamey?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairperson.   Mr van Zyl, you have applied for amnesty before this panel for your involvement in the Nelspruit incident during which four persons were killed and including later, Tiso Leballo, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>You have also initially applied for the Carousel incident, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>However, upon further consideration you elected to abandon this application?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>On page 206 of the Bundle before the panel up to and including page 224, your amnesty application appears?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Therein you deal with both the incidents, however they have been mentioned chronologically in your amnesty application?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>This application was signed by you on the 10th of May 1997?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>The application was compiled after consultation and you assisted with that with a previous legal representative?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Do you say that what appears in your statement has been stated according to the best of your recollection and is according to the best of your recollection a true version?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>In paragraph 7 you state or refer to the National Party, were you a member or a supporter of the National Party?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>I was only a supporter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>At the stage when the Nelspruit incident took place, you had a business, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>What was the name of this business?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Panakai Investigations.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Very well.   Were you before 1992, a member of the Police Force?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Where were you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>During the last few years with the police, I was stationed with Brixton Murder and Robbery.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>I refer you to the period of 1986 to 1989?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Could you tell us whether you resigned immediately after that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>And immediately after your resignation, what did you do?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>I joined Slang van Zyl in a business called Incom Investigations.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Mr van Zyl, had he also been a member of Murder and Robbery at Brixton?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Do you know whether at that stage, he had any other connections?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Later I determined that he had connections with the CCB.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>How long were you in business with him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I am speaking under correction, it was approximately a year.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>This business of yours is it a Close Corporation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>When did you begin with your own business?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That was during 1990 or 1991, I cannot recall the precise date.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Could you tell us what your business involved?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, basically we investigated criminal and civil matters, we planted tapping devices and also looked for tapping devices in certain places, the English word for that is debugging, we also investigated marital cases and I had an informer network which channelled information to me which we then sent through to the various Security Branches.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Would that be for payment?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>When you were with Murder and Robbery in Brixton, did you have any experience in detective work or investigations?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Did you also handle informers then?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>During your service as a policeman with Murder and Robbery, you were never a  member of the Security Branch?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>In terms of your work at Murder and Robbery, did you undertake investigations in terms of crime, specifically murder, in which for example persons had been killed who had been connected with terrorism?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>And then could we call this politically related crime?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="61">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did you investigate politically related crimes at Murder and Robbery?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="62">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, there were many such instances in Alexandra, the black township.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="63">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Are you referring to murders?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="64">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="65">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>That you investigated?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="66">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Later, there was a specific division which was opened only for that, with which I was not involved, but some of our people from Brixton were transferred to that division.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="67">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And what cases did they investigate?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="68">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Murder and then other offences as well.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="69">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Such as necklace murders?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="70">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="71">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Lamey?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="72">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Were there also cases of robbery which were investigated which were politically related?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="73">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="74">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>So as such Murder and Robbery was criminally oriented, but it was about the crime such as the murder or the robbery, regardless of who had been involved in it, regardless of whether there was a political opponent or a political person belonging to certain political institutions or liberation movements?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="75">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.  Wherever a suspect was not known in a murder, Brixton would investigate the matter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="76">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>That would then be court oriented investigations in order to prosecute people?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="77">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="78">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>During your time as a policeman with Murder and Robbery and then after your resignation, did you know what the political struggle was about, did you have any ideas about it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="79">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="80">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Would that be professionally or as a citizen?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="81">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>As a citizen and there were also many reports in the newspaper and I also had exposure from fellow workers.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="82">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>On which side of the political spectrum did you find yourself, what were your sentiments towards the liberation movements, the ANC, the PAC and so forth?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="83">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>I wasn&#039;t very well disposed towards them, naturally in later  years, this changed and now it all makes sense especially with regard to the propaganda which was sold to us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="84">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>And if it made sense to you in later years, which period of your life are you referring to?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="85">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>1994, 1995, very interesting things were communicated via Max du Preez&#039; programme on the SABC.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="86">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>What was your impression of the political situation in and around 1991, 1992?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="87">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>According to me we were still involved in a war against the various political parties who were fighting against our regime of that time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="88">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>During your service at Murder and Robbery and or thereafter, did you know of a Unit known as Vlakplaas?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="89">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="90">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I beg your pardon, at which point was this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="91">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, it was only with the case of the four AK47s and the woman in Hillbrow that I met persons in a work environment from C10, I had been introduced to Mr de Kock at a social function, where I basically shook hands with him, but C10 was well known in police circles.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="92">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So  they were known in police circles, but you only made real contact with them when you began your own business, your own detective business?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="93">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="94">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry Mr Lamey.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="95">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>What did you know about Vlakplaas and C10 when you were still a member of the Police Force?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="96">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>I knew that they dealt specifically with urban terror, internal security.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="97">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Did you know that they were a Unit within the Security Branch of the South African Police?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="98">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="99">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>A special Unit?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="100">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="101">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Very well.   If we can deal more with the general activities of your business, when you established the business, Panakai, you had persons in your service who also provided information to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="102">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="103">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Who reported to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="104">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="105">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>You refer to this on page 208.   Your purpose was to collect information and then to convey this to branches of the South African Police about drugs, weapons, unlawful activities, dealings with gold, diamonds, rhinoceros horns and then also robberies?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="106">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="107">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Mr Lamey, he has confirmed this application and he has said that he stands by it, so if there are any additional matters to the application, it is not necessary for us to deal with every single word that is stated in the application, you can just supplement where you feel it is necessary.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="108">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>As it pleases you.   May I just ask you, this information which you had, did you sell it at a price, and what I mean by that is, would you tell the police, I have information, I want a certain amount for it, this is the value that I attach to it and then you would tell them your price and sell it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="109">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson, I did not have any influence over the amounts which were paid out.  I did however expect a reward, seeing as I regarded it as a service that I had rendered.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="110">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>How did it operate?  May I ask you, I would just like to lead you about it, just to expedite matters unless there is an objection.  Was it basically as Mr Holtzhausen stated, you would not give any input, you would just come forward with information, you had a specific contact person within a Unit who was your handler and when there was any talk of a reward, he would make a submission and you never really knew what the amount would be that you would receive?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="111">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is entirely correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="112">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>It would be judged according to value by the handler?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="113">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="114">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Can you just tell us when officially did you meet C10 and when was this and when did it take place?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="115">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, it was during 1991.  We received information from a black lady who was dealing in AK47 guns.  The transaction was set up with the woman, consequently I contacted Eikenhof Firearm Unit upon which they most probably would have informed C10, because Dougie Holtzhausen and one Mr Stolz arrived on the day for the action.   Later it occurred that the woman arrived with four AK47 guns.  I introduced her to these persons and an arrest ensued.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="116">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>And how was it that you were recruited as a source or an informer for C10?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="117">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>A few days later I was contacted by Mr Holtzhausen to arrange for a meeting at the Johannesburg Sun Hotel during which Mr de Kock was also present.  Upon that I was paid out an amount of money for the AK47s as a reward and at that stage, Mr de Kock requested me whether I would be interested in working on a more regular basis with them in providing information upon which I agreed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="118">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>From whom did you receive the reward?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="119">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>I think the first reward and I am speaking under correction, but I think it came directly from Mr de Kock.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="120">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Very well.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="121">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Mr de Kock also asked me at that stage whether I would be interested in becoming an informer for them and then Sgt Dougie Holtzhausen would be my handler.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="122">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Just to create an image of how you operated, how did you go about collecting the information, how did you present yourself and what was your external persona in order to create credibility?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="123">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>I presented myself as someone from the underworld.  I don&#039;t know, many persons would want to know how a criminal would look, but I know that my appearance was not neat, I had long hair and so forth, and then naturally I would try to move in and around these sorts of people, I would visit certain places where there were criminal elements such as bad hotels in the Johannesburg district and so contact was usually made.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="124">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Did you do this under a false name?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="125">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Definitely.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="126">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Did you consistently use the same false name or did it change?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="127">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>It would change.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="128">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Very well.   What sort of informer did you become for C10,  were you a full-time informer or how did it work?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="129">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>I did not receive a monthly salary as a full-time informer would, a full-time informer would receive a full-time salary per month whether there was information or not, I would only receive a reward if I provided information which led to an arrest or a successful action.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="130">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>At the stage when you became an informer for C10 on a more regular basis, what was your impression of C10, did they only show an interest in purely criminal information or what was your regard of their role in terms of their security role, their political security role?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="131">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I was aware that they were still busy with counter-insurgency, that they were still working with that, they focused on unlawful weapons coming in over the borders and then they also dealt with the criminal aspect.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="132">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Would you have wanted, except for the income that you would receive, did you associate yourself with their action from a security  perspective, at that stage?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="133">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="134">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Would you from your perspective, wanted to assist them with information so that they could achieve the objectives that they set out to achieve?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="135">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="136">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And this is without any payment?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="137">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, there were many such cases during which I did not receive any remuneration, and this wasn&#039;t a problem for me.  I am still involved in crime investigation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="138">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You did not receive any reward, but you expected it because you told us that you rendered a service?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="139">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="140">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So you expected some form of reward for it because you were a businessman?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="141">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, but sometimes it would happen that I did not receive payment and that was not a problem for me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="142">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did you not go to your Attorneys to sue the State or anything like that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="143">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="144">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>In conjunction with this, the information that you provided, you expected to get a reward for this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="145">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="146">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>The information which you provided in this case, you also expected to get a reward for?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="147">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Yes Chairperson, with regard to this particular case, I worked for four months and there was a lot of time and energy and expenses which I invested in this investigation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="148">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>So your motive with everything here was to work to receive a reward and you were also working because you had political intentions to act against the members of another political party?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="149">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Money was one of the motives, yes, that is true.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="150">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Well, then I think that over this weekend, you should talk to your legal representative and see where you stand with regard to the Act for amnesty.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="151">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="152">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I can address you on that point right now, it was thoroughly considered.  May I refer you ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="153">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>No, you don&#039;t have to argue this now, you can consult about this over the weekend and we can see how far we can get now with the evidence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="154">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I do not wish to waste the time of the Committee.   If it is a problem, may I just present the basis upon which we argue that Mr van Zyl qualifies for amnesty in terms of the law.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="155">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Won&#039;t you please place your entire case before us, because we are almost at the end of the day.  You don&#039;t have to argue now, the case has been placed before us, we will hear it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="156">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>As it pleases you.   Very well, let us continue.  Let us deal with the Nelspruit incident, you had an informer by the name of Hamilton, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="157">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Hamilton was one of my permanent staff members who also provided information.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="158">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Is that Langa Ndimande, what was his name?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="159">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he also operated under the name Langa Ndimande.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="160">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>At a certain stage you met Tiso Leballo, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="161">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="162">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Can you briefly tell us how you met him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="163">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Hamilton approached me and alleged that there was a person who had cocaine to sell.  The usual procedure was to establish a meeting during which I would meet with the person.  I stand under correction, but I think that it was the third or the fourth meeting during which he handed the cocaine to me.  With our first meeting, we just spoke generally about criminal activities, our backgrounds and each one played his role there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="164">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Do you know whether Hamilton had political connotations and what they were?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="165">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I do know.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="166">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>What were his connotations?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="167">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>He was a trained PAC member, and specifically he was an anti-aircraft gunner who had received training in Zimbabwe.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="168">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Was he also a returnee, one who had returned, whatever the term may be?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="169">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>He was illegally in the country, according to me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="170">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And he worked for you on a full-time basis?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="171">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="172">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did he work for payment for information that he provided?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="173">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>No, he was permanently appointed on a salary basis and he then had informers below him who he handled.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="174">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But was he supposed to provide information for you, as a payment?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="175">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that was one of his tasks.   Let me just reconfirm that the company did not only provide information to the police, we also had our own civil investigations for companies.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="176">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So did he assist you with these investigations as well?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="177">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="178">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But he also gathered information as part of his duties for his salary, for his money that he made?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="179">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  Whether he had brought in five or ten matters, he still received his regular salary package.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="180">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So he was somewhat like a permanent informer with the police?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="181">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="182">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But the principle was the same?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="183">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="184">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Lamey.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="185">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Very well.   Do you know whether Hamilton had contact with the ANC, with ANC members?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="186">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="187">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Very well.   I just want to bring you back to the meeting with Tiso.   Did Hamilton tell you that he knew someone who wanted to sell cocaine to him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="188">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="189">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>What else did you do about it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="190">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, this is Hamilton and myself, we met Tiso at the Carlton Shopping Centre in Johannesburg, I think it was at the Wimpy where I then was introduced to Tiso as John, that was my false name at that stage.   We discussed various offences in which I basically reconnoitred the field in order to see what he was involved in.  I would just like to mention the offences specifically.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="191">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="192">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>It would be stolen cars, armed robberies, smuggling in arms, smuggling with drugs, counterfeit money.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="193">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>So you put out feelers for various forms of crime?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="194">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct ... (no interpretation)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="195">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Did he show any interest?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="196">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he was interested.  On the second occasion if I have it correctly, he was interested in the armed robbery.  With our first meeting his words to me were that he was looking for something with which he could make money and he needed money urgently.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="197">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>At that stage, did you know whether he had any further political affiliations or when did you find out?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="198">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Upon our very first meeting, he informed me that he had just returned from exile and that he was with the ANC.  I don&#039;t think that it was upon the first occasion that he made it known to me that he was operating from Shell House, I only established that later, but he was quite open about this information.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="199">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Did he mention anything about training?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="200">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>He did say that he was a trained MK member.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="201">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>At that early stage, had you already communicated this information to Holtzhausen?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="202">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>I would have.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="203">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Did you receive instructions from Holtzhausen to go ahead?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="204">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, yes.  Dougie Holtzhausen&#039;s attitude was simply to keep working on the subject, which we did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="205">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Very well.   Was there any other work, did you use Hamilton?  How did it operate, did you arrange further contact yourself, what happened?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="206">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Most or all of the meetings were usually set up by Hamilton and naturally the more we met each other, the easier Tiso felt in my company.  He was also impressed with the fact that I could speak the language of the underworld.  I knew how much would be paid for a stolen vehicle, I knew how much would be paid for an AK47, I could talk along about cross-border weapons.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="207">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Cross-border weapons, was that ever mentioned between you and Tiso at any stage?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="208">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he stated specifically and gave me information with regard to weapons which were re-entering the country in empty petrol tanks.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="209">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>And did you at any stage hear anything from him regarding stolen vehicles?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="210">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Yes Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="211">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Could you elaborate on that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="212">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>He told me that most stolen vehicles would be exchanged on the other side of the border, specifically in Mozambique for the purchase of AK47s.   I just want to return to my previous answer with regard to the petrol tanks, I just want there to be an understanding that we are not referring to the petrol tank of a car, but these large petrol tankers which transport fuel over the border and when they were empty, they would be filled with AK47s.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="213">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>The question of the cocaine and the drugs, how did this happen?  Initially you were introduced to him about this, what happened with that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="214">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I think it was on the second or third meeting that Tiso handed over some powder to me which allegedly according to him, was the cocaine regarding which the initial appointment was set up.  I tested the powder at a certain stage and found it to be regular baby powder and when I gave it back to Tiso, he said that other people also said so with reference to the fact that it was baby powder.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="215">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Tiso told you that he was interested in the sort of crimes which generated money?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="216">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="217">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>And various forms thereof?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="218">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="219">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>And from your experience at that time of crime and the underworld, did criminals or the sophisticated criminal, specialise in the generation of money, would they specialise in various areas?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="220">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, a criminal would focus on his specific field and naturally it would be that offences were committed in the execution of a robbery, because then a vehicle would necessarily be stolen, however it is my experience that a car hijacker would not become a bank robber.  A car thief would not necessarily commit the usual shop robbery.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="221">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Very well.   Did Tiso return to you with regard to the possibility that you spoke of concerning the robbery?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="222">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Yes, with our meeting, when I discussed the field of robbery with him, I told him that I was also becoming involved in robberies in the sense that I would often convey information about places to rob.   The discussion in that regard was usually to the extent that the subsequent statement so such a person would be &quot;I first want to see how you commit a robbery, can you do it, are you tough enough&quot; and that would usually be how we would obtain the information about where the prospective robbery would take place and then we would convey that information to the police.  Specifically with Tiso, I did the same and told him that I knew about a security company in Nelspruit that I wanted to rob, but that I needed experienced people for this.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="223">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Did you mention the name of the security company to him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="224">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>No, not at that stage.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="225">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Later?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="226">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Yes, later.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="227">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Why was it important for you to mention that you needed able persons to do it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="228">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, these were the people whom we concentrated upon and I did not want an innocent person involved in this and if they spoke the same language as we could, then I would know because there are certain questions which I would put to him to find out whether he was just boasting or whether he indeed had proper exposure.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="229">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>In the Bundle there is a note, on page 377,  have you seen that before?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="230">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>I have Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="231">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>By whom was it drawn up?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="232">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>It was drawn up by Hamilton Ndimande.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="233">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Reference is made there that Tiso had made a request and reference is made to Mr BB, who is that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="234">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is I.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="235">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>This note was drawn up in December 1991, it appears.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="236">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Specifically the 9th of December, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="237">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Here, with reference to that note, can you please say what was of import there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="238">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, as I have said earlier, this was the instance where we met Tiso again with regard to the results of the supposed cocaine and I saw that Hamilton made a note that Tiso wanted to know what was going on with the Nelspruit incident and that I would inform him that I was waiting for him and his people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="239">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>What did Tiso tell you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="240" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR VAN ZYL:	&quot;... Tiso however said that he would need tools for the job, as he does not have any tools at the moment.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="241">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>What do you refer to as the tools?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="242">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>The tools refer to firearms.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="243">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Please continue.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="244" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR VAN ZYL:	&quot;... We then asked Mr Tiso whether he had pulled any job before, but he said that he had not.  Neither of his men had done any job before.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="245">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Please continue.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="246" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR VAN ZYL:	&quot;... Mr BB informed him that he needs experienced people as this is a place that needs such people.  Next meeting was not arranged, follow up is continuing.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="247">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Now with regard to the question which you put to him whether he had had beforehand, this comes down to robbery, has he pulled any job?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="248">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="249">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>And did he say no?  He said no and none of his people had ever done any of this kind of work?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="250">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="251">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>At which stage with regard to the meeting with Tiso, was this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="252">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, it was the third or fourth meeting, we were still building that relationship.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="253">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Did he later tell you anything else with regard to, that he had previously been involved in these things?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="254">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>He did Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="255">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>And the people whom he referred to?  I would just like to ask you, Chairperson, there is a document which we have obtained ourselves, which does not form part of the Bundle, it is a Bundle which I understand was handed out to everybody, it is in regard to a note from Hamilton Ndimande, I don&#039;t know if you have it.  Can we find it and then give it an Exhibit number, it was dated the 18th of February 1992.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="256">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>That document was here on the first day and from that time, we could not surmise what was going on, because nobody told us what it was about.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="257">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>The front page of the document says Annexure D.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="258">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Is it marked?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="259">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>No, it is not marked as an Exhibit yet.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="260">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Would that be L?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="261">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>As it pleases you Chairperson.  Could you please explain to us, is this also a note which was drawn up by Hamilton?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="262">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="263">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>From the first paragraph it would seem that Hamilton had an appointment with Tiso himself?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="264">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="265">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Did Hamilton report to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="266">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="267">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>How long was this before the first Coin operation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="268">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>The first attempt was on the 26th of February, the evening and the morning of the 27th of February.  So it was nine days before that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="269">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>What was reported to you, if you look at the note itself?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="270">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That Hamilton had indeed had contact with Tiso once more and that Tiso had said that he was anxious to do some work and that his people as is referred here, his guys, that they were anxious to commit armed robbery.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="271">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Will you read the relevant part please.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="272" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR VAN ZYL:	&quot;... inform him that the guys that are prepared to the job, are still making enquiries on what is taking place.  He informed me that we need to do the job fast so that the guys will trust what he is talking about.  He went on to inform me that the guys have done a lot of jobs &quot;armed robberies&quot; in the past of which they are confident that this will do a good job.  He then requested me to try and organise a meeting with Mr John so that he can finalise the matter and then go and make report back to the guys in Soweto.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="273">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>So Tiso requested from Hamilton to arrange a further meeting with you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="274">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="275">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>And a further meeting did take place?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="276">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="277">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>What was discussed or what was requested, can you recall?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="278">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, we did indeed meet.   He confirmed that he wanted to commit the armed robbery and it did not go along according to the planning that I had in mind.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="279">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>What do you mean by that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="280">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>As I have said earlier, the actual purpose of all this was to find out where these guys were committing robberies so that we could obtain such information, so that we could set a trap for them where they could be arrested.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="281">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>So he comes back to you to follow up on the place which you had identified in the first?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="282">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="283">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Did he mention anything about weapons?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="284">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>He said that they were in possession of weapons</text>
		</line>
		<line number="285" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;... he then informed us that the guys have pistols for the job and they will need a big weapon, say an AK.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="286">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I would like to confirm, he did indeed ask me if I could provide him with AK47s.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="287">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Did you communicate the information to Sgt Holtzhausen?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="288">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I did Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="289">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>What was his instructions to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="290">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Once again that I had to continue with the investigation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="291">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>What did you tell Tiso, what would you do?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="292">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, the arrangement was that I would meet him and take him through to Nelspruit because he wanted to see the place.   We then arranged a meeting with him for the 20th of February, whereafter we met him in Hillbrow, I think it was at the Record Bar, there is some CD shop there where we met.  Referring to us, it is Hamilton and I who met him that particular morning.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="293">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Can you recall at that stage, if you knew of any connection between him and Mrs Winnie Mandela?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="294">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, it is difficult, I cannot specifically recall whether it was before or after this date.  I can specifically recall the incident where I identified it, but the exact date, I am not quite certain of.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="295">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Very well.   Just to complete this aspect, how did you hear that he was working for Mrs Mandela?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="296">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I had a meeting with someone at the Brazilian Coffee Bar at the Johannesburg Court and after I had finalised my meeting there, I went outside and I saw Tiso in a white Mercedes.   I had a conversation with Tiso and at that stage he said that he was waiting for Mrs Mandela because she was visiting her Advocates and that he had been appointed as her personal chauffeur.   At a later stage I checked the registration number of the Mercedes and I surmised that it was an AVIS or Imperial vehicle, it was a hired vehicle.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="297">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Did you have contact with him in Shell House or did you know whether he had worked there and how do you know?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="298">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Yes Chairperson, he contacted us from Shell House.  At some stage he for example had an arrangement with me that the Toyota Cressida which has been referred to during these proceedings, to take it to the Diplomat Hotel for him and the Diplomat Hotel was a block away from Shell House, so it would have made sense why I had to take it to that particular hotel.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="299">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>At that stage, which institutions made use of Shell House?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="300">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>The ANC Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="301">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Was that their Head Office at that stage?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="302">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="303">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Very well, let us return back to the point, you have said that you met Tiso in Hillbrow.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="304">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>The appointment, yes, we did indeed meet him the morning of the 20th in the music shop, Hamilton and I.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="305">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>What was discussed then?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="306">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>We picked him up there and the three of us went through to Nelspruit in order to point out the premises which had to be robbed, to him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="307">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Was this done?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="308">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>We indeed went through to the industrial area of Nelspruit and with our arrival there, we identified the premises.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="309">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>What was identified to him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="310">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>The Coin Security premises.  I personally went into the Coin offices and during which time Hamilton and Tiso wandered around in the street outside in order to establish or familiarise themselves with the surroundings there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="311">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>May I just ask you was there a specific reason why you chose that place, or why you proposed that place to Tiso?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="312">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, in the underworld, or the role that I played, I tried to stay as close to the truth as possible, so if anybody wanted to follow up my information, that it could indeed be supported or that it would seem realistic.  I was familiar with Coin Security&#039;s offices in Nelspruit and for that reason, I had indeed done so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="313">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>What did you know about the Coin Security building?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="314">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I had done an investigation in the premises opposite Coin Security and one gentleman, a Mr Otto Muller was employed there in the Lowveld Training Centre and his wife worked as a receptionist at Coin and because of the investigation that I had undertaken, I did not go to their office, I went to the offices of Coin and had discussions there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="315">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>If Tiso would ask you specifics, then you would give it to him because you were familiar with the place?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="316">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I knew the premises quite well.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="317">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>After Tiso had looked at the place, was he still interested?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="318">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Definitely.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="319">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>What happened then, did you give further reports to Sgt Holtzhausen?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="320">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>I kept him up to date with the developments and the investigation continuously.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="321">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Was an appointment or was an indication given to Tiso with regard to robbery of the premises?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="322">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I was aware that at the end of the month there were large amounts of money on the premises and that information was also conveyed to Tiso and that is when we established a date which would be the 25th/26th of February.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="323">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Very well.   Were any arrangements with regard to a vehicle and the AK47s which were requested?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="324">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, once again, in order to exercise control over the possible operation, I made the proposal that I would avail one of my vehicles to them and the reason for that was that I would have control of the vehicle and I would not loose them on the way to Nelspruit, so the consequence was that shortly before we departed for Nelspruit for the first attempt at Coin, I then handed over the light blue Toyota Cressida to Tiso and with regard to the AK47s ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="325">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Where did you get the vehicle?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="326">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>The vehicle was supplied by Sgt Holtzhausen.  With regard to the AKs, I did not comply with his request.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="327">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Did you ever tell him anything about it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="328">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Not that I can recall.  I do recall that it was quite strange for me that he asked the AKs of me after he had offered AKs to me and afterwards I surmised that it was a matter of that he was too scared of taking his own weapons on such a long trip.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="329">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Wasn&#039;t he taking chances?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="330">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>No, definitely that is not the impression that I had of him, Chairperson, he knew what was going on.   He elaborated much about his activities.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="331">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Even after the baby powder?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="332">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I didn&#039;t have a problem with the baby powder because I think it was a test that he wanted to test me.  It looked very realistic and in the manner in which it is packaged also, it is as how one would buy it in the street.  I think he only wanted to test me with the baby powder.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="333">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>As well as the AK47s.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="334">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>The AKs, he knew what the price was on the street and the fact that the AKs had come through the border on the petrol tanks, not everybody knew that.  Most of the information was that AKs which were hidden in the petrol tanks of private vehicles, but he specifically referred to AKs which were hung in bags inside the big tanks.  I had no doubt that he had firsthand knowledge or had access to AK47s.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="335">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Very well.   I suppose you are going to be quite a while Mr Lamey?   We are not at Coin, my colleague reminds me that we are on our way.  We cannot conclude your evidence-in-chief Mr van Zyl, but we have indeed come to the end of the day and at this stage we would have to adjourn.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="336">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, after statements which were put to Mr Holtzhausen by Mr Lamey and because of documentation which were - that it may be necessary for us to refer to parts of the record with regard to the trial.  I would have to read it the weekend, I haven&#039;t read it and if it is so, then I will ask your permission for this and then we will ascertain, we will make sure that copies be made and made available.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="337">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Very well.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="338">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>I am mentioning it now so that Mr Lamey knows about it, so that he will also have an opportunity to study the documents.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="339">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Very well, we will note it as such and make it available without disrupting the flow of the proceedings.  Mr van Zyl, we will stand down at this moment, and we will continue with the proceedings on Monday morning, at half past nine we will reconvene here in these premises.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="340">
			<speaker>MR VAN ZYL</speaker>
			<text>I understand so Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="341">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Is that in order?  Yes, we have come to the end of the day today, we cannot proceed much further.  There is still a substantial bit of evidence-in-chief that Mr Lamey is going to lead, there is no sense in trying to complete that.  For that reason, we are adjourning at this time, and we will reconvene here on Monday morning at half past nine.  We are adjourned.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="342">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>