<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY HEARINGS</type>
	<startdate>1999-09-29</startdate>
	<location>PRETORIA</location>
	<day>3</day>
	<names>LEON WILLIAM JOHN FLORES</names>
							<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=53718&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/1999/9909271005_pre_990929pt.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="115">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>English or Afrikaans?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>English.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>Your full names for the record.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>LEON WILLIAM JOHN FLORES</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>Sworn in, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Commissioner Sibanyoni.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Flores, you&#039;ve prepared an application in terms of Section 18 of Act 34 of 1995, presented it to the TRC Committee in Cape Town and provided your full co-operation with the TRC Committee&#039;s Investigating Team, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>At all times during this incident you were ...(indistinct) as envisaged in Section 20(2)(b) and Section 20(2)(f) of Act 34 of 1995, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>You served in the Section called C1, of Vlakplaas, which workings of Vlakplaas are fully amplified in the previous documents before this Committee.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>You served under the command of Eugene de Kock, your commanding officer, and at all times carried out your instructions, strictly no a need-to-know basis, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>In your amnesty application from folio 225 to folio 228, you confirm the contents of your amnesty application.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>On folio 225 you, under the heading &quot;Operation Cobra - Swaziland&quot;, you say that Capt Deon Nieuwoudt of the Security Branch in P.E. requested C1 for assistance of ANC activists who were leaving Port Elizabeth for Swaziland, where they would receive a course in arms training.  Is this averment of yours correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairperson, that is a mistake.  I don&#039;t know it came that I put that section there, but that should totally be deleted from that application.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>What was your rank at that time, when this operation took place?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>I was a Sergeant, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>I see.  Now I trust that you weren&#039;t fully informed from the top command structure of what the exact actions were that were to take place in Swaziland and exactly what the political motivation from the senior Security Branch officers were?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>That would be correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>You worked strictly on a need-to-know basis, did you realise you were acting against ANC terrorists at that time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>So this opening paragraph on page 225 seems like an averment, or your conclusion that you drew from the facts within your knowledge.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>I see.  And it has transpired that Capt Deon Nieuwoudt was not involved in this matter at all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Fine.  But you knew you were acting against ANC activists?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>You received instructions to go to Swaziland and you in fact also did go to Swaziland, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>You heard the testimony and the cross-examination by Eugene de Kock, did you in fact receive instructions and in fact scout out the area where the ambush was to take place?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Mr Chairperson, I did accompany Col de Kock.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>And I understand that Swaziland was your operational area.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>So you knew it well.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Was Adj Snor Vermeulen involved in this matter at all?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>Well I can recall not at all, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  You were one of the members who in fact laid in the ambush waiting with a firearm, is this correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>You were equipped also with a AK47 with a silencer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>I see.  You participated and you in fact participated in the killing and murder of the three victims, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Fine.  You&#039;ve heard the other evidence of the kombi with fitted panels and you agree with the evidence already led before this Committee.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>I see.  Did you receive any other reward except your salary, as envisaged in Section 20(3)?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>Nothing whatsoever, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Did you have any ill will or spite against the victims?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>Not at all, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>You felt that you were carrying out your duty in the interests of the serving government at that time, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>You apply for amnesty before this Committee, for the murder and your participation of the murder of the three victims, as well as any delict which might flow from these actions, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR CORNELIUS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Hattingh, Mr Chairman, I have no questions, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR HATTINGH</text>
		</line>
		<line number="61">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>No questions, thank you, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="62">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR BOOYENS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="63">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>Nel, Mr Chairperson, no questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="64">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS MR NEL</text>
		</line>
		<line number="65">
			<speaker>MR ROSSOUW</speaker>
			<text>No questions, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="66">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR ROSSOUW</text>
		</line>
		<line number="67">
			<speaker>MR BOTHA</speaker>
			<text>Botha, Mr Chairman, I&#039;ve got no questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="68">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR BOTHA</text>
		</line>
		<line number="69">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Visser, Mr Chairman, no questions, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="70">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR VISSER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="71">
			<speaker>MR VAN HEERDEN</speaker>
			<text>Van Heerden, Mr Chairman, no questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="72">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR VAN HEERDEN</text>
		</line>
		<line number="73">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Do you confirm that two vehicles came to the scene of the ambush?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="74">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I do, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="75">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And I think you&#039;ve said you arrived at the scene about two hours before, you dropped off about two hours before.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="76">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>I think that&#039;s correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="77">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And that you waited for an hour and a half, you were dropped off and then you had to go to the scene of the ambush and you waited there for an hour and a half.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="78">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>If not longer, that&#039;s correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="79">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>There was a delay?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="80">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="81">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Do you know if any arms or explosives were found in the vehicle?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="82">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>What I can recall, nothing at all, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="83">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You did search it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="84">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>Personally myself, no.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="85">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But somebody in your group did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="86">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="87">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Re-examination?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="88">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>No re-examination, thank you Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="89">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO RE-EXAMINATION BY MR CORNELIUS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="90">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Right, excused on the usual ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="91">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
		<line number="92">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chair, I represent a further application, which does not form part of the documents before you at the moment, D J Britz.  We have subsequently found his application, I&#039;ve tabled it to the TRC Evidence Leader, Mr Steenkamp, whose got full knowledge of this and I&#039;m at present preparing an affidavit with the documentation to be presented to the Committee.  Unfortunately he won&#039;t testify due to his medical condition.  I&#039;ve received medical reports as well and I will table that as soon as it&#039;s out of the oven.  Thank you, Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="93">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Have you discussed this with your colleagues?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="94">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;ve discussed it with my colleagues.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="95">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>None of them wish to question him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="96">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t think there is any objection, most of his evidence is common cause.  He was a driver on the lookout vehicle.   But he is present, I&#039;ve got him present if there&#039;s any problem with that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="97">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You all agree.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="98">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>I do not have any questions for him, thank you, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="99">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR HATTINGH</text>
		</line>
		<line number="100">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t have any questions, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="101">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR BOOYENS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="102">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>Nel, I won&#039;t have any questions for Mr Britz either.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="103">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR NEL</text>
		</line>
		<line number="104">
			<speaker>MR ROSSOUW</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, I haven&#039;t had insight into his application, but insofar as there is a possibility, in the light of the other applicants, that he might implicate Mr Nortje, the ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="105">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>We will take it that we get the same answer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="106">
			<speaker>MR ROSSOUW</speaker>
			<text>... then I don&#039;t have any questions for him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="107">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR ROSSOUW</text>
		</line>
		<line number="108">
			<speaker>MR BOTHA</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;ve got no questions, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="109">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR BOTHA</text>
		</line>
		<line number="110">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, I don&#039;t know, it doesn&#039;t seem as if I might have questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="111">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR VISSER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="112">
			<speaker>MR VAN HEERDEN</speaker>
			<text>Van Heerden, Mr Chairman, I&#039;ve got no questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="113">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR VAN HEERDEN</text>
		</line>
		<line number="114">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="115">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>The documents will be tabled to my colleagues anyway, thank you Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>