<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY HEARINGS</type>
	<startdate>1999-09-29</startdate>
	<location>PRETORIA</location>
	<day>3</day>
	<names>LARRY JOHN HANTON</names>
							<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=53719&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/1999/9909271005_pre_990929pt.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="84">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, I would like to call my client, I think if I could just move seats, Mr Hanton, and his application is found on page 90 of the bundle, and I&#039;ve placed before you, Mr Chairperson, also an additional affidavit signed by Mr Hanton here this morning.  I believe this will be Exhibit K, if I may.  Thank you, Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>Your full names please.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>LARRY JOHN HANTON</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Hanton, you are an applicant for amnesty, and your application is filed and found on page 90 of the bundle and you have read that once again, do you confirm the correctness thereof?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>I do, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;ve also drafted an affidavit on your behalf which is marked Exhibit K, if I may refer you to that as we go along.  On the first page in the first few paragraphs, up to paragraph 5, you give a brief outline of your background in the South African Police Services, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>You also state that you had the opportunity to peruse the applications of the other applicants in this matter and you also refreshed your memory again.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>Briefly, on page ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Can I interrupt at this stage and merely put something on record.  Paragraph 5, you talk about the Security Branch Camperdown, was that the farm at Camperdown?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.  From Vlakplaas, Mr Hanton was transferred to the Durban so-called Vlakplaas, which was under Col Taylor at Camperdown, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>In paragraph 8, Mr Hanton, you set out that  your amnesty application, when you drew that up your memory was very vague and already before this or at a previous hearing, documentation has been handed in to prove that you suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder and this might be a reason for your lack of memory.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>Do you confirm that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>I confirm that, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>But you however, respectfully submit that all along you&#039;ve made an attempt to make a full disclosure.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>Correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>Now if we may move on to paragraph 10.  Immediately you say there that originally you were under the impression that four people were killed, but having heard the evidence and having read the other applications, you realised that only three members, or three people were in fact killed in Swaziland.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>And you also made a mistake with the date in your application when you said it might have been in 1987 or &#039;88, but we know now it&#039;s common cause that the incident actually happened on the 12th of February &#039;89.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>Then from paragraph 11 onwards you refer to submissions by Gen van der Merwe and also you have gone through a judgment in the matter of Cronje.  You also refer in paragraph 12 to what serves before this Committee as Exhibit A and also you have read the documentation and the evidence which was led by Col de Kock during the initial Vlakplaas, may I call it the Cluster 1, regarding Vlakplaas and how it operated.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>Correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>And do you also ask that that be incorporated as part of your amnesty application?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>Correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>Paragraph 14, Mr Hanton, you deal with the incident in question, where you received instructions from Col de Kock regarding what you had to do, and you say there that you believed that the authority to take part in the operation, emanated from higher authority.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>And that fits in with the general manner in which instructions were conveyed to Vlakplaas.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>Paragraph 15, you mention a couple of names of people who might have been on Vlakplaas when the instructions were given, but you cannot remember all the members present.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>Then you deal further on with the incident and you believe that, you accept that the main mission was to eliminate these people, that you were instructed to do so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>You were also tasked with loading the kombi or the minibus with the weaponry, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>And a previous applicant, Bellingan then left with the minibus for Swaziland?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>The paragraph there onwards on page 8, deals with the incident and you confirm the correctness of Col de Kock&#039;s evidence as to how the operation took place and, do you confirm that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>I do, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>After the operation was successfully finalised, the following morning you and Bellingan left with the very same vehicle back to South Africa?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>To shorten the proceedings, Mr Hanton, in paragraph 28 you respectfully submit that you&#039;ve complied with all the provisions of the Amnesty Act, and you set out fully in paragraph 28(a) to (h), why you say so.  You confirm pages 10 and 11 as well?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>I confirm that, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>Mr Hanton, is it then so that you apply for amnesty for the conspiracy to murder these three people and any other offence or delict that might flow from this particular incident?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairman, that is the evidence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR  NEL</text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Hattingh, Mr Chairman, I have no questions thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR HATTINGH</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Booyens, no questions, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR BOOYENS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Cornelius, Mr Chairman, no questions thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR CORNELIUS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker>MR ROSSOUW</speaker>
			<text>Rossouw, Mr Chairman, no questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR ROSSOUW</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker>MR BOTHA</speaker>
			<text>Botha, Mr Chairman, no questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR BOTHA</text>
		</line>
		<line number="61">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Visser, Mr Chairman, no questions, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="62">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR VISSER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="63">
			<speaker>MR VAN HEERDEN</speaker>
			<text>Van Heerden, Mr Chairman, no questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="64">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR VAN HEERDEN</text>
		</line>
		<line number="65">
			<speaker>ADV STEENKAMP</speaker>
			<text>No questions, thank you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="66">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY ADV STEENKAMP</text>
		</line>
		<line number="67">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>Just one question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="68">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Did you, Mr Hanton, also book in at the Smoky Valley Resort?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="69">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>I did, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="70">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>If you were supposed to come back to South Africa the same day, why was it necessary to book in at the resort?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="71">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, I can&#039;t remember the exact circumstances at that time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="72">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="73">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>No questions, Mr Chairman, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="74">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Do you remember trying to cross the border that night?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="75">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>I do, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="76">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And you couldn&#039;t do it because of the weather conditions, the mud on ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="77">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="78">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Re-examination?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="79">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>No re-examination, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="80">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO RE-EXAMINATION BY MR NEL</text>
		</line>
		<line number="81">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>May my client be excused under the same conditions, Sir?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="82">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Certainly.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="83">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="84">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>