<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY HEARINGS</type>
	<startdate>1999-10-08</startdate>
	<location>DURBAN</location>
	<day>9</day>
	<names>EDWARD ALLAN PEARCE</names>
							<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=53744&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/1999/9909271013_dbn_991008db.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="185">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Morning everybody.  Yesterday when we adjourned, Mr Dehal indicated that Mr Pearce would be testifying today.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>MR DEHAL</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairperson.  Mr Chairperson, this morning we had time, and I&#039;m indebted to you for that time, endeavours were made by Mr McBride to meet, I think with Ms Welgemoed.  Mr Richard has been talking with them with a view to facilitating that.  I don&#039;t think that has happened as yet.  Perhaps we can take it up later.  We thought it prudent to begin first.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>MR DEHAL</speaker>
			<text>Ms Kooverjee is going to lead Mr Pearce and after him out other client, Mr Andrews, and then I would address you, Mr Chairperson, on the future witnesses.  Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker>EDWARD ALLAN PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Kooverjee?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>MS KOOVERJEE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairperson.  I have prepared statements of Mr Allan Pearce.  May I have leave to hand them</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>in?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, thank you, that will be Exhibit Q.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>MR DEHAL</speaker>
			<text>Correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MS KOOVERJEE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Pearce, is it correct that you have brought about an application for amnesty?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it is.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>MS KOOVERJEE</speaker>
			<text>I refer you to bundle A1, on page 187 to 189.  Is that your application for amnesty?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it is.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker>MS KOOVERJEE</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  Will you please explain to this Committee, was this application completed by yourself?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it was.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>MS KOOVERJEE</speaker>
			<text>Were you assisted in any way?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>MS KOOVERJEE</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  I refer you now to your statement.  Will you please read from Annexure Q on your general background.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Pearce, if you can just bear in mind that the interpreters will be translating simultaneously when you&#039;re reading, so if you can just read slow enough for them to keep up with you.  Do they have a copy of the statement?  Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker>MS KOOVERJEE</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR PEARCE</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I am presently employed as a security officer for the African National Congress and still a member of the ANC.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>		I have been convicted of all the acts/operations that I seek amnesty on and have served an effective sentence of three years, six months.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>		During the course of operations I acted as a combatant with comrade Robert McBride.  Robert and I grew up together in the Wentworth area and we got to know each other well.  As we grew up we became increasingly politicised.  Our people in Wentworth and generally in South Africa were suffering.  There was either no education or very poor education, jobs were scarce.  Many of the comrades in my area who suffered as I did, shared the same political perception and we generally met in Ogal Road on numerous occasions and held discussions about our plight.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>MS KOOVERJEE</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, Mr Pearce, is Ogal Road in Wentworth?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it is in Wentworth.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker>MS KOOVERJEE</speaker>
			<text>Please go on.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR PEARCE</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Some of those who attended these meetings were Matthew Lecordier and Antonio du Preez, Naziem Kassiem and Marson Sharpley.  Robert also attended these discussions and supplied us with political material, which I read.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, Mr Pearce, just before you proceed.  During what period would this be, more-or-less?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>1985.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;In 1986, Robert invited me to join his unit and informed me that in the near future he will arrange for me to be trained outside the county as an MK cadre.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>		In our various discussions we discussed the various ways and means that we could use to get back at the then government for the way they were oppressing us and our people.  One such idea was to burn down schools in Wentworth, so that bigger and better schools could be built.  I was frustrated at the inequalities in this country and the impoverished state we were in.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>JUDGE PILLAY</speaker>
			<text>Mr Pearce, were you trained as a cadre eventually?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>No, Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker>MS KOOVERJEE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Pearce, you now go onto the arson attack at Fairvale Secondary School, which is referred to in bundle A1, page 6, item 4, being an incident which occurred on the 3rd of September 1985.  Is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker>MS KOOVERJEE</speaker>
			<text>Okay, will you please read on.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR PEARCE</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;The attack on Fairvale Secondary School was an idea that Robert up, with which we agreed.  Matthew Lecordier and I were doing night school at the time at the same Fairvale School.  The school was falling apart.  This was a prefab building.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>		Robert and another comrade, whose name I cannot recall, earlier left petrol on the school premises.  That evening Robert, Matthew Lecordier, Naziem and Marson Sharpley and I got together and went to the school to carry out the operation. </text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>		Whilst Matthew, Marson Sharpley and I kept guard, Robert and Naziem broke the window of the school with a view to entering the classroom.  I&#039;m not too sure who entered.  After the petrol was spilled we left Naziem who was to have lit the match and to have thrown it into the classroom to set it alight.  He was chosen as he was the fastest and the fittest and could run away easily.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>		The next day I learnt that the school had suffered damages arising from the arson, but they were superficial burns only.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker>MS KOOVERJEE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Pearce, you now go on to the attack on the industrial water supply pipe in New Germany.  That is referred to in bundle A1 on page 10, item 21.  Do you confirm that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I do.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker>MS KOOVERJEE</speaker>
			<text>Okay, please go on.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR PEARCE</text>
		</line>
		<line number="52" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Robert and Matthew Lecordier advised me that they would pick me up at 1 o&#039;clock in the morning as there was something we needed to do.  They picked me up and drove me to New Germany.  We operated on a strictly need-to-know basis.  This was discipline explained to me by Robert and we had to strictly adhere to this.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>		The reconnaissance of the area was first carried out and the route was checked out and it was established that there were no roadblocks.  We then returned to Wentworth, where Robert picked up two limpet mines.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>		The arranged plan was that Robert would stop on the freeway, whilst Matthew and I would get out and climb up the bank.  Matthew and I carried a limpet mine each, given to us by Robert.  It was arranged that Robert would go to the next turnoff and return to the other side of the freeway.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>		Matthew and I got out and went to the pipes.  We had some difficulties with the pipes and Matthew suggested that we place the limpet mines on the valves itself.  We did so.  We pulled the pins and left and returned down the bank, where Robert met us and we left.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>		The next day I learnt that the limpet mines had exploded.  There were no persons injured or killed in this operation.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker>MS KOOVERJEE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Pearce, is it correct that you were charged with illegal possession of arms and ammunition?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker>MS KOOVERJEE</speaker>
			<text>And you were sentenced for this.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I was.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="61">
			<speaker>MS KOOVERJEE</speaker>
			<text>Okay, will you please explain this.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="62">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR PEARCE</text>
		</line>
		<line number="63" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;If I can correctly recall it was shortly after June 1986, that Matthew gave me two limpet mines and one handgrenade and requested that I should keep it safely.  He said he would later discuss with me as to what I was to do with it.  I was subsequently arrested during 1986.  The handgrenade and limpet mines were buried behind a shopping centre.  These were all later discovered by the Security Police and taken away by them.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="64">
			<speaker>MS KOOVERJEE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Mr Pearce, there was some suggestion made about, at the time when the book &quot;Until Babylon Falls&quot; was discussed, that you were a member of the Vultures Gang.  Can you please explain that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="65">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>A member of?  I didn&#039;t catch the ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="66">
			<speaker>MS KOOVERJEE</speaker>
			<text>The Vultures Gang.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="67">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The Vultures Gang.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="68">
			<speaker>MS KOOVERJEE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="69">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>I was never a member of the Woodstock Vulture Gang.  I lived in that area and the reason why I left was because there was a lot of violence there.  And as far as the statement in this book, I never met this author, I never read the book.  So I don&#039;t know how he got this information.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="70">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Pearce, you said the Woodstock Vultures Gang, is that Woodstock down in Cape Town?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="71">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>No, in Wentworth.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="72">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Oh, Woodstock in Wentworth.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="73">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>Wentworth, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="74">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Okay.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="75">
			<speaker>MS KOOVERJEE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Pearce, during the course of your operations, was anybody injured?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="76">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="77">
			<speaker>MS KOOVERJEE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Sir, that is the evidence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="78">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MS KOOVERJEE</text>
		</line>
		<line number="79">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, Mr Pearce, just before I ask people if they want to cross-examine you, illegal possession of arms and ammunition you&#039;re applying, from the statement it would appear that you&#039;re applying in respect of those limpet mines which Mr McBride left to you some time in June 1986.  When you were convicted of for instance, this pipeline incident, were you also convicted of being in unlawful possession of limpet mines?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="80">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>All acts ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="81">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So you apply - you don&#039;t restrict your application for illegal possession of weapons, to ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="82">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>I was convicted and sentenced for the act.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="83">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>For the act and also for being in possession of limpet mines.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="84">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="85">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So you&#039;re applying for that, yes.  Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="86">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Berger, do you have any questions you&#039;d like to put to Mr Pearce?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="87">
			<speaker>MR BERGER</speaker>
			<text>Just one, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="88">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Pearce, you said that you didn&#039;t receive any training outside South Africa as an MK cadre, but would it be correct to say that you did receive training inside South Africa as an MK cadre?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="89">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="90">
			<speaker>MR BERGER</speaker>
			<text>And from whom did you receive that training?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="91">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>From Matthew Lecordier.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="92">
			<speaker>MR BERGER</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, I have no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="93">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR BERGER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="94">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did that include how to use a limpet mine?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="95">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>A limpet mine and handgrenades, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="96">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Dehal, do you have any questions that you&#039;d like to put to the witness?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="97">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR DEHAL</speaker>
			<text>Not so much a question, but simply to clarify the following point.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="98">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Pearce, the Woodstock Vultures is a gang - sorry, is a gang that is reputed to be in Wentworth and operates from Wentworth and has the name Woodstock Vultures.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="99">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="100">
			<speaker>MR DEHAL</speaker>
			<text>And what you&#039;ve said is you&#039;ve never had anything to do with it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="101">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="102">
			<speaker>MR DEHAL</speaker>
			<text>Inasmuch as you&#039;ve said you had not met the author, I think his name is Mr Brain Rostrin of the book &quot;Till Babylon Falls&quot;, had you ever been interviewed by any other person indirectly for the purposes of that book?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="103">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>Not at all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="104">
			<speaker>MR DEHAL</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Thank you, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="105">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR DEHAL</text>
		</line>
		<line number="106">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Dehal.  Mr Richard, do you have any questions you&#039;d like to put to Mr Pearce?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="107">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>A number.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="108">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	You say you received, that you met and discussed various matters with various people, and in paragraph 3 you say -</text>
		</line>
		<line number="109" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Some of those who attended these meetings were Matthew Lecordier, Antonio du Preez, Naziem Kassiem and M Sharpley.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="110">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Now when did these discussions take place?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="111">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>In-between the period of 1986/1986.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="112">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>So did they continue until about June &#039;86?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="113">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>Could be, I&#039;m not too sure.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="114">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now do you recall discussion at those meetings about the plan to plant a bomb at a hotel or pub in central Durban?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="115">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>Not at all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="116">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Did you recall the idea being debated that handgrenades should be thrown at targets?  I&#039;m not interested in what sort of targets yet.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="117">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>No, not at all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="118">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>So the question of throwing handgrenades at any police station, motor vehicle or individuals was never discussed, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="119">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>It could have been discussed, but there was no specific target.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="120">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>The next question is, while you might have not discussed specific targets, was there any discussion as to what sort of targets handgrenades might be thrown at?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="121">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>At Security personnel and collaborators.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="122">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>And what were collaborators within the context of those discussions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="123">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>People who worked closely with the Security Force and also people who were members of the Labour Party.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="124">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>When you say &quot;closely with the Security Forces&quot;, what does the word &quot;closely&quot; mean to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="125">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>They could be reservists.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="126">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now training.  You say Mr Lecordier trained you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="127">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="128">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>What training did he give you, what did he teach you to do?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="129">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>He first taught me how a handgrenade works, how to detonate it, after pulling the pin, how long it would take before the handgrenade would explode when you let got the device on it, a handle and he also taught me about limpet mines, how to put a detonator into it, how to put a timer into it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="130">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Who else was trained with you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="131">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>It was just me and Matthew, Matthew and myself.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="132">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Did he give you any training as to what casualties were permissible or not permissible?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="133">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>It could have been discussed, but I&#039;m not too sure.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="134">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>When you say joined, do you mean that you were recruited into the group known as Special Operations?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="135">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>No, we were a group that stayed together, we didn&#039;t go, we only took instructions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="136">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Apart from the Fairvale School operation where, from what I gather, it was a group discussion and decision, did you ever conduct an attack on any target where it was simply you that chose the target?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="137">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="138">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>No further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="139">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR RICHARD</text>
		</line>
		<line number="140">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Richard.  Mr Prior, do you have any questions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="141">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY ADV PRIOR</speaker>
			<text>One question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="142">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Did you ever receive any training from Mr McBride, whether military or political?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="143">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>Political, yes.  We had discussions and he did give me political material.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="144">
			<speaker>ADV PRIOR</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="145">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY ADV PRIOR</text>
		</line>
		<line number="146">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Prior.  Ms Kooverjee, do you have any re-examination?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="147">
			<speaker>MS KOOVERJEE</speaker>
			<text>None, thank you, Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="148">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO RE-EXAMINATION BY MS KOOVERJEE</text>
		</line>
		<line number="149">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Adv Sigodi, do you have any questions you&#039;d like to ask Mr Pearce?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="150">
			<speaker>ADV SIGODI</speaker>
			<text>None, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="151">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Judge Pillay?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="152">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Thank you, Mr Pearce, that concludes your testimony.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="153">
			<speaker>MR DEHAL</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, Mr Chairperson, Mr McBride has asked me to clarify an aspect.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="154">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Certainly.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="155">
			<speaker>MR DEHAL</speaker>
			<text>Could I just confer with Mr McBride quickly?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="156">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Certainly.  Sorry, while you&#039;re conferring, if I could just as a question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="157">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	You say that you were recruited.  Prior to that were you a member of the ANC or just a supporter, or what was your political standpoint?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="158">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>I used to attend UDM meetings, UDF meetings, the United Democratic Front Meetings and I used to help in the Wentworth youth projects.  There were student bodies there and we would made T-shirts, I would help them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="159">
			<speaker>FURTHER CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR DEHAL</speaker>
			<text>May I proceed, Mr Chairperson.  Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="160">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Pearce, just to clarify.  Mr McBride sitting on my right has indicated to me that you referred to the period &#039;86 to &#039;86, could you be mistaken?  It was in fact as I understand it, 1984 to 1986.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="161">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>Could be, yes, I must have made a mistake there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="162">
			<speaker>MR DEHAL</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  And secondly, in the command structure that you belonged to, between Mr Lecordier, yourself and perhaps other persons, I think you referred to yourself as having been the Commander of that unit - sorry, bear with me ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="163">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>He said that they were group, would stay together and he basically acted on instructions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="164">
			<speaker>MR DEHAL</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m sorry, Mr Chairperson, I misunderstood that, perhaps I&#039;ll rephrase that question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="165">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Pearce, in regard to the taking of decisions, when you were cross-examined by Mr Richard you talked about individuals taking the decision, is it not correct that you jointly, with Matthew Lecordier and others who featured in that unit, made joint decisions after joint discussions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="166">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, we did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="167">
			<speaker>MR DEHAL</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, that is all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="168">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR DEHAL</text>
		</line>
		<line number="169">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, sorry, Judge Pillay has indicated that he wished to put a question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="170">
			<speaker>JUDGE PILLAY</speaker>
			<text>Mr Pearce, what&#039;s your date of birth?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="171">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>The 1st of January 1961.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="172">
			<speaker>JUDGE PILLAY</speaker>
			<text>And what&#039;s your educational qualifications?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="173">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>At the stage when we burnt the school I was doing night school, standard eight.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="174">
			<speaker>JUDGE PILLAY</speaker>
			<text>At that school?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="175">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>At the same school, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="176">
			<speaker>JUDGE PILLAY</speaker>
			<text>And did you attend the same school when you were attending normal school?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="177">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="178">
			<speaker>JUDGE PILLAY</speaker>
			<text>Were you part of the student politics while you were at school?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="179">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>No, not while I was at school.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="180">
			<speaker>JUDGE PILLAY</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="181">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Any questions arising?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="182">
			<speaker>MR DEHAL</speaker>
			<text>None from me, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="183">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Pearce, that then concludes your testimony.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="184">
			<speaker>MR PEARCE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="185">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>