<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY HEARINGS</type>
	<startdate>1999-10-21</startdate>
	<location>PRETORIA</location>
	<day>7</day>
	<names>DANIEL JACOBUS KRUGER</names>
	<case>AM5233/97</case>
						<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=53783&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/1999/99101228_pre_991021.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="104">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>We shall be commencing with the application of Mr Kruger, is that so Ms van der Walt?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>DANIEL JACOBUS KRUGER</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Mr Kruger your amnesty application appears in bundle 1 from page 355 to 365, or 357.  That would be the official application form and the incident for which you are appearing before this Honourable Committee in terms of amnesty, appears from page 358 to 360 and the motivation for, political motivation is from page 365.  Where were you stationed during the time of the incident?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker>MR KRUGER</speaker>
			<text>At the Security Branch in Compol building, Section C, Pretoria.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>And who was your Commander?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>MR KRUGER</speaker>
			<text>Capt. Prinsloo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>You have heard the evidence of the other witnesses.  You yourself did not participate in any investigation or interrogation with regard to this person known as Mandla?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>MR KRUGER</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>And such is the information which was conveyed to you, indicated from page 358 paragraph 2 to page 359 paragraph 9.  You received this information from whom?  This information which is embodied in these pages.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>MR KRUGER</speaker>
			<text>From Capt Prinsloo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>What was your task on the farm when Mandla was detained?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>MR KRUGER</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, it was merely to guard him, to safeguard him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Were you aware that he had been abducted?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>MR KRUGER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I knew about that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>And you were aware that he was not on the farm under legal arrest?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker>MR KRUGER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Who are the persons who guarded him with you there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>MR KRUGER</speaker>
			<text>It was Sgt Luddick, Lieut Roodt, Matjeni and Mathebula.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>You state in paragraph 4 that Lieut Roodt undertook interrogation, is that an error?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>MR KRUGER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is an error.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>And do you then request that the Honourable Committee amend this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker>MR KRUGER</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>That it indicates that he simply guarded Mandla?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker>MR KRUGER</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>One morning after you had awoken, you noticed something on the farm, what was it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker>MR KRUGER</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, Matjeni and Mathebula came to me and told me that this man, Mandla, who was known to me as Mandla, had been burned by certain persons and that I had to come and take a look.  I went to look outside.  I saw that the man was naked, that he was bound to a water tank, that he had been burned on the forehead, that he had also been burned on the testicles and at the back between the buttocks.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>What did you do?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker>MR KRUGER</speaker>
			<text>I loosened him and I had Betadine ointment which I applied to his forehead and I asked the other members to apply the ointment to the other parts of his body which had been affected.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>What happened to him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker>MR KRUGER</speaker>
			<text>I then let him put on his trousers and he went to sit inside the tent.  He said he didn&#039;t want to put on his shirt.  He was clearly in pain.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Did you have anything further to do with him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>MR KRUGER</speaker>
			<text>Nothing.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>What happened later that day on the farm?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker>MR KRUGER</speaker>
			<text>Capt Prinsloo arrived there.  He was very upset.  He chased all of us away from there and I drove.  That is all that I know about the incident.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>I note that you state in paragraph 7 that you went to sleep that evening and that the following morning Mandla was no longer on the farm.  What do you say about that paragraph?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>MR KRUGER</speaker>
			<text>That is not correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Why do you wish for it to be amended?  When did you realise that you had made an error?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker>MR KRUGER</speaker>
			<text>After I had consulted with you and studied my affidavit, I saw that there was an error and that this was not the truth.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>On that same day, you were chased away from the farm.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker>MR KRUGER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, indeed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>And you have no further knowledge of what happened to Mandla subsequently?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker>MR KRUGER</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>And do you then request that the Honourable Committee grant you amnesty for any offence which may emanate from the actions, such as the assault which you knew about, and the abduction of Mandla, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker>MR KRUGER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>As well as for any delictuable accountability which may emanate therefrom?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker>MR KRUGER</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Nothing further, thank you Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MS VAN DER WALT</text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Ms van der Walt.  Mr Botha?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker>MR BOTHA</speaker>
			<text>No questions, Madam Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR BOTHA</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>That will be in respect of Mr Goosen and Mr Momberg?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker>MR BOTHA</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Mr du Plessis.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Madam Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Kruger, as I understand your evidence now, it differs from what was stated yesterday that you would testify, or that it was put that you would testify that you loosened him the following morning, and now your evidence has differed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>There is no difference in his evidence, that is still what he says.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Did you loosen him the following morning?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="61">
			<speaker>MR KRUGER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="62">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Did he spend the entire night bound to the water tank?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="63">
			<speaker>MR KRUGER</speaker>
			<text>I assume so, I cannot say.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="64">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>You were not present during the interrogation when he was burned with a log?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="65">
			<speaker>MR KRUGER</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="66">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>So you don&#039;t know what took place there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="67">
			<speaker>MR KRUGER</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="68">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Madam Chair, my instructions from my client and especially Brig Cronje, are that we do not oppose Mr Kruger&#039;s application and therefore, apart from pointing out this one discrepancy, I&#039;m not of a view to carry on cross-examining</text>
		</line>
		<line number="69">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Mr Kruger.  As it pleases you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="70">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR DU PLESSIS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="71">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Mr Jansen.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="72">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="73">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Kruger, your version differs only in one aspect from that of my client and that is the fact of whether or not you were involved in the official arrest.  I don&#039;t wish for you to concede that you are mistaken, but would you concede that you have to recall an incident which took place many years ago in terms of your affidavit and that you may have used persons like Mr Prinsloo to refresh your memory?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="74">
			<speaker>MR KRUGER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.  I may have been mistaken.  It is all hearsay.  I simply heard it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="75">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chair, I have no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="76">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR JANSEN</text>
		</line>
		<line number="77">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Prinsloo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="78">
			<speaker>ADV PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>No questions, thank you Madam Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="79">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR PRINSLOO</text>
		</line>
		<line number="80">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Joubert.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="81">
			<speaker>MR JOUBERT</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Madam Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="82">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR JOUBERT</speaker>
			<text>Just the same aspect as what Mr Jansen has discussed with you with regard to the arrest and Mr Mathebula.  I suppose the same with the application with Mr Mathebula, you simply heard about the arrest, it is based on hearsay?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="83">
			<speaker>MR KRUGER</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="84">
			<speaker>MR JOUBERT</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson, nothing further.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="85">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR JOUBERT</text>
		</line>
		<line number="86">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Van Heerden.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="87">
			<speaker>MR VAN HEERDEN</speaker>
			<text>No questions, Madam Chair, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="88">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR VAN HEERDEN</text>
		</line>
		<line number="89">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Steenkamp.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="90">
			<speaker>MR STEENKAMP</speaker>
			<text>No questions, thank you Chairlady.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="91">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR STEENKAMP</text>
		</line>
		<line number="92">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Kruger, when you state on page 359 paragraph 4 that Mr Mbizana was intensively interrogated by Capt Crafford, Lieut Jaap van Jaarsveld, you&#039;ve just conceded that Mr Roodt was not there, how do you know of this intensive interrogation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="93">
			<speaker>MR KRUGER</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, all of this is hearsay, I was not present, I did not see it.  These are things which the people who were there guarding with me, told me, I didn&#039;t see these things myself.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="94">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Who told you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="95">
			<speaker>MR KRUGER</speaker>
			<text>Matjeni or Mathebula, I&#039;m not certain which of</text>
		</line>
		<line number="96">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>the two, but both of them were heavily upset.  It was clear to me that this was the first time that they had witnessed something like this.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="97">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The ointment, the Betadine Ointment that you applied on Mr Mbizana, where did you get it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="98">
			<speaker>MR KRUGER</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson I had a cut, I am a diabetic, I use the ointment myself, and I simply applied it to him because I had it on me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="99">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  You are excused, Mr Kruger.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="100">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
		<line number="101">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  The next applicant is Brig Cronje, Mr du Plessis?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="102">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Madam Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="103">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And that will be the last applicant in respect of this incident?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="104">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>