<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY HEARINGS</type>
	<startdate>1999-11-03</startdate>
	<location>PRETORIA</location>
	<day>14</day>
	<names>KOKELA JEREMIAH MATJENI</names>
							<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=53861&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/1999/99110212_pre_991103pt.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="201">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>He&#039;ll sit on my left-hand side here.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  Can we request that the headphones or microphones be rearranged accordingly.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>His evidence will also be in Tswana, Madam Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>ADV MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Matjeni, give us your full names again.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker>KOKELA JEREMIAH MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker>ADV MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Sworn in, Madam Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Motata.  Mr Jansen?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Matjeni, you previously testified before this Committee in other incidents, in respect of your personal background and your background in these South African Police.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>Correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>And you want the Committee to consider that evidence when they consider your application in respect of this incident.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>Correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>You also previously testified about the initial application which you handed in before the cut-off date, and that was handed up to the Committee at a previous hearing.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>Correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>Now your application in respect of the incident relating to Comrade X, is found on pages 80 to 85, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>Correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>And you confirm the correctness thereof.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>Correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>Now your rank in 1987 was that of a Constable, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>Correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>And you were in C-Section of the Northern Transvaal Security Branch.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>Correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>From who did you get your orders in respect of this incident?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>In regard to this incident I received my orders from Capt Prinsloo or Capt Crafford, both of them because they were in charge.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>Now just two of the, or some matters that became contentious between some of the other applicants.  You state in your application that Mr Lubane was not assaulted in your presence, do you confirm that still?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>Correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>There was also evidence by Mr Bester that according to his memory, you were also present when certain photographs or maps were shown or dealt with, with Mr Lubane.  Can you remember something like that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson, I don&#039;t remember anything of that sort.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>Now at the time of this incident you were fully aware of the fact that Mr Lubane was not legally detained.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>Correct, Chairperson, I knew.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>And when you returned from going to buy beer at the shop, as you say in your application at page 82, you then saw for instance, human remains being picked up, being some hair and part of the scalp.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>I did not see that, I heard somebody say later that he picked up a piece of hair on that place, but I did not see that myself.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>When you say you heard it, you heard it at the time when you were still there on the farm?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it was later after that incident, but we were still at the farm when I heard about that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>And these things led you to assume that Mr Lubane had been killed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson, I did not know his name, I only knew him as Comrade.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>And as you have previously testified, you regarded it as part of your job to remain silent about what had happened to this person.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>Correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>Now can you remember where this farm was?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>It is on that side of Rust-de-winter, but I don&#039;t know directly where it can be.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>What do you remember of the approximate location of this farm?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>When you arrive at Rust-de-winter Police Station, you&#039;d turn left, then you&#039;d take a road towards KwaNdebele.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>Is that a road - when you say turn left, is that a road that goes North?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>From Rust-de-winter that road goes towards Rust-de-winter, towards KwaNdebele.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>Let&#039;s just try and get the directions again.  It&#039;s correct as you describe in your application, that first you travel North with the N1, the big highway?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>Correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>And then you turn right at ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>You turn right at Pienaarsrivier.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  The Pienaarsrivier turn-off.  The Pienaarsrivier would be on your left-hand side, if you&#039;re on the highway.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>On the highway, Pienaarsrivier, that area is Pienaarsrivier, then from there you turn left, then you turn right again.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>Ja, but I&#039;m just trying to find out how you drove.  You turned right, when leaving the highway you turned right towards Rust-de-winter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson, you turn right towards Rust-de-winter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>And that road eventually takes you to the Rust-de-winter Police Station.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>It doesn&#039;t go straight towards the police station, you&#039;d find a T-junction towards Rust-de-winter, when you turn right you go to the police station and then when you turn left you go to join the road towards KwaNdebele.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>And how long along that road going to KwaNdebele - or can you remember how far along that road one goes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t know, Chairperson, it&#039;s quite a distance.  If I remember well, it&#039;s quite a distance.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>And was this farm next to the road?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>It is near the road on your left-hand side of the road.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>And you will be prepared if requested so by the TRC or the victims, to attempt to find this place again, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>If it was like other farms which I was able to identify, but this one, it would be difficult for me.  I&#039;m not able to commit myself to do that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="61">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>No, but you would be prepared to assist. Obviously you may not find the place, but you will be prepared to assist, am I correct if I understand your instructions in that way?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="62">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>I would try to help, but I don&#039;t think I would be able to find the farm.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="63">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>Now as far as this incident is concerned, is it correct that you received no special remuneration or anything, apart from your ordinary salary for this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="64">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>Correct, Chairperson, I didn&#039;t have any special benefit.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="65">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>And Comrade X, as he was known to you at that stage, the only knowledge that you had of him was that he was a political activist of some sort.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="66">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>I heard so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="67">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chair, no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="68">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR JANSEN</text>
		</line>
		<line number="69">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Jansen.  Mr Swart, do you wish to put any questions to Mr Matjeni?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="70">
			<speaker>MR SWART</speaker>
			<text>No questions, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="71">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR SWART</text>
		</line>
		<line number="72">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Mr Prinsloo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="73">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY ADV PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Matjeni, in your application on page 81, the second paragraph, you say there</text>
		</line>
		<line number="74" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;We were on the farm for approximately one to two weeks.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="75">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Are you not perhaps mistaken with the time period, because you have heard all the other witnesses speak of a week or less?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="76">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m confusing these incidents, I don&#039;t know exactly how long we stayed at that farm.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="77">
			<speaker>ADV PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>You had been with the Security Branch for quite some time and you must have been involved in numerous interrogations.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="78">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="79">
			<speaker>ADV PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And with regard to this incident you are relying on your memory, not on any notes that you may have compiled.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="80">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>I only state what I&#039;m able to remember about this incident.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="81">
			<speaker>ADV PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And this incident took place approximately 12 years ago.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="82">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>Correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="83">
			<speaker>ADV PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And you were also asked about a photo album, can you recall specifically that there was no photo album, or do you simply think so, or were there cases in the past during which a photo album was used, or is it impossible for you to say?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="84">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m not able to state anything in regard to the photo album because it was used in various operations, it was shown to many people.  But I don&#039;t remember in this particular instance whether the album was used.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="85">
			<speaker>ADV PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson, nothing further.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="86">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY ADV PRINSLOO</text>
		</line>
		<line number="87">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Prinsloo.  Ms van der Walt?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="88">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="89">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Matjeni, in paragraph 2 on page 81, it would appear from your statement that you and Smuts - that would be Mr Mathebula, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="90">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>Correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="91">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>... and Kenny More, Mbatha, Chris Putter, Kat Bester, Prinsloo, Dos Santos and other persons who you cannot recall, participated in the interrogation, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="92">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>I did not take part in any interrogation.  If I remember well, the only person responsible for the interrogation was Capt Prinsloo and then again Capt Crafford.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="93">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>If you were alone with Mr Lubane, did you never speak to him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="94">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>It was myself, Mathebula and Bester who would always be with him all the time.  If someone was outside, always I would cook, I would look for wood and I would leave him with them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="95">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>You see the reason why I&#039;m asking is because you stated in your statement that you had participated in the interrogation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="96">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>That would be a mistake because we were not allowed to take part in the interrogation of any person.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="97">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>But you were present.  If I study the first section of paragraph ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="98">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I was present.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="99">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Then I would like to refer you to page 82, paragraph 4, where it is clearly stated and you also testified to this</text>
		</line>
		<line number="100" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I heard that someone had picked up a small piece of scalp with hairs on.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="101">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>You were not there by the hole, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="102">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>When we returned - it was a distance from the house where we were staying, then I left them at the farmhouse, then I dropped them there and then returned to the farmhouse.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="103">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t really understand, I don&#039;t know if it was correctly interpreted.  You say that you returned and you left who at the farmhouse?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="104">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>We black members went to the bottle store in Pienaarsrivier, then when we returned I dropped them on the road and when I say &quot;on the road&quot;, I mean where white members were, then I took the car to the farmhouse, but within the same farm.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="105">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Then I understand you.  You were not at the hole, you dropped the others off next to the road and you went back to the farmhouse, is that correct?  I don&#039;t wish to misunderstand you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="106">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it&#039;s within the same yard.  I don&#039;t want you to confuse this because you say I&#039;d left them in the street.  I left them within the farm where the white members were, then I took the car within the yard to the farmhouse, then I returned on foot to where they were.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="107">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I think what is being sought from you is, at what stage did you hear about a piece of flesh having been discovered.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="108">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>That is when I returned and joined them.  They were busy looking for something there.  Then thereafter, I don&#039;t remember well, but he did not tell me on the scene, he told me after that he found a piece of scalp together with the hair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="109">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>So you didn&#039;t see that a piece of scalp was actually picked up, you heard about this later.  This that you heard later, was this when you were once again back at the farmhouse?  Would you give me an opportunity to finish my sentence please.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="110">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Please listen carefully before you respond to the question, give her time to finish her question, then thereafter you can have the opportunity to answer the question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="111">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>May we just begin again, Mr Matjeni.  Your evidence was that you heard that a piece of scalp had been picked up.  You did not see it, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="112">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson, I did not see that, I heard about it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="113">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Very well.  Then you went ahead and stated that you heard this upon a later occasion, that a piece of scalp had been picked up.  Is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="114">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>Please repeat your question, I don&#039;t understand.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="115">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>You testified, Mr Matjeni - and this is not me that is saying this, this was your evidence, you testified that it was only upon a later occasion that you heard that a piece of scalp had been picked up.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="116">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>I repeat again that one of them, I don&#039;t remember who, as to whether it was Kenny or Smuts, one of them informed me that he picked up a piece of scalp.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="117">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>And when were you informed about this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="118">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>I repeat again, I don&#039;t remember what time, as to whether it was on the scene or in the farmhouse.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="119">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Because if I have understood your evidence correctly, you stated that you were there at the hole, but that it was only upon a later occasion that you came to hear about this remnant of scalp and now you say that you cannot recall whether it was at the hole or in the house.  Therefore, you are uncertain, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="120">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>Firstly, I would say - when you say I was next to the hole, I don&#039;t know what you&#039;re talking about, I was not there.  I don&#039;t know what you&#039;re talking about when you say at the hole or in the farmhouse.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="121">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Very well.  Were you not at the hole at all?  When you returned and dropped off the persons there where the white members were and returned to the farmhouse, did you then remain at the farmhouse?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="122">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>I went to where they were, but I would not say it&#039;s a hole, I would say it was a ditch or it was levelled at that time when I arrived.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="123">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Therefore you didn&#039;t see that this remnant of scalp was tossed into a hole and covered up.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="124">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>I did not see, Chairperson, I heard.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="125">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>As you state in your affidavit.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="126">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>Correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="127">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Nothing further, thank you Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="128">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MS VAN DER WALT</text>
		</line>
		<line number="129">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Joubert?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="130">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR JOUBERT</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Madam Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="131">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Now Mr Matjeni, you&#039;ve just given evidence now that you at no stage went close or near to a hole, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="132">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>At the place where they were I was there, but I did not see a hole.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="133">
			<speaker>MR JOUBERT</speaker>
			<text>Now if I refer you to paragraph 4 on page 82 of your application, the second line thereof, you say</text>
		</line>
		<line number="134" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;We went to them, where I noticed a hole in the ground.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="135">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Can you explain this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="136">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I will.  I&#039;m trying to distinguish the two issues, because I learnt that Bester said they dug a big hole, I saw a ditch.  I would say if I can put my leg there, it would be a little bit shallow.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="137">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>It was nevertheless a hole that you observed ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="138">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="139">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Forget Mr Bester&#039;s evidence, you are being questioned about your evidence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="140">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it was a small hole.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="141">
			<speaker>MR JOUBERT</speaker>
			<text>And do you know whether this hole was filled up afterwards?  Closed up, filled?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="142">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m not sure, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="143">
			<speaker>MR JOUBERT</speaker>
			<text>Did you hear ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="144">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>On papers you have stated that it has been filled up.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="145">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, the filled up the hole, but I&#039;m not sure about that, as to whether it was full or not.  I don&#039;t remember well.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="146">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>When you wrote on your statement, were you writing according to your knowledge or were you trying to remember?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="147">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>I was not remembering well, but I was trying to speculate of what had happened.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="148">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Joubert?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="149">
			<speaker>MR JOUBERT</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Madam Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="150">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Just one or two other issues.  On page 81, paragraph 2 where you provide your list of people partaking in the interrogation, you mention Mr More, is there a possibility that you may be mistaken when referring to Mr More as partaking in the interrogation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="151">
			<speaker>MR MALAN</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m sorry, we have the last sentence of that paragraph and he confirmed that in evidence, that the black members did not participate in the actual interrogation.  So it&#039;s a confusion.  He says</text>
		</line>
		<line number="152" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;We were all there participating in the interrogation&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="153">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>... but then he continues to say -</text>
		</line>
		<line number="154" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;It was the whites&#039; jobs, the blacks did not interrogate.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="155">
			<speaker>MR JOUBERT</speaker>
			<text>Very well, I&#039;ll leave the aspect there then if it is clear to the Committee.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="156">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	One final issue.  You&#039;ve testified that you were informed by either Kenny or Smuts, that being Mr More or Mr Mathebula, about this piece of scalp that was picked up.  Is it possible that you may be making a mistake as to who informed you or who picked this piece of skin up?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="157">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>That is why I&#039;m saying I don&#039;t remember who informed me about that.  It may be Bafana, because he was present there.  I don&#039;t remember well.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="158">
			<speaker>MR JOUBERT</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Madam Chair, I have no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="159">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR JOUBERT</text>
		</line>
		<line number="160">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But you do recall that you were told by a black member of your unit.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="161">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, one of the black members informed me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="162">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr van Heerden?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="163">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR VAN HEERDEN</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Madam Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="164">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	You stated in your evidence-in-chief that you would be prepared to assist the family in detecting the place where the deceased was killed.  Did I understand you correctly?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="165">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>I would try to find out, but I&#039;m not able to tell that I will be able to find that place.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="166">
			<speaker>MR VAN HEERDEN</speaker>
			<text>Would you for example, travel around in that area with the family and have a look, or go there with an investigative team?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="167">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>What I&#039;m trying to say is that if we can take that direction, maybe I would be able to identify that place.  If I&#039;m not able to identify that place, nobody should blame me because I don&#039;t know who is the owner of the farm and it was for the first time I went there, during this incident.  It is not the same as the two farms which I&#039;ve stated earlier that that one was Pretorius&#039; farm, the other one was Mr Smith&#039;s farm.  I don&#039;t know where this farm is and I don&#039;t know the owner.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="168">
			<speaker>MR VAN HEERDEN</speaker>
			<text>Are you saying that you would not be able to find the place?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="169">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t want to commit myself.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="170">
			<speaker>MR VAN HEERDEN</speaker>
			<text>The only thing that bothers me is that you say you are prepared to assist, but that you have already decided that you won&#039;t be able to be of any assistance.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="171">
			<speaker>MR MATJENI</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t want to commit myself so that in future I will be blamed that I stated that I will be able to show them the place.  So I don&#039;t want to commit myself on that particular issue.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="172">
			<speaker>MR VAN HEERDEN</speaker>
			<text>I just want to know if you are prepared to help.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="173">
			<speaker>MR MALAN</speaker>
			<text>Mr van Heerden, I think that there is some form of mis-communication here.  The applicant has stated that he is prepared to go out there and to assist with the search, but that he cannot guarantee that he would be able to find the place.  He has his doubts because he does not know who the owner of the farm was, nonetheless he is prepared to go out and participate in a search.  He just doesn&#039;t want the Committee to blame him if their search in fruitless, but he is prepared to go along and assist.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="174">
			<speaker>MR VAN HEERDEN</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, I will then leave it at that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="175">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR VAN HEERDEN</text>
		</line>
		<line number="176">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Steenkamp?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="177">
			<speaker>ADV STEENKAMP</speaker>
			<text>No questions, thank you Madam Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="178">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY ADV STEENKAMP</text>
		</line>
		<line number="179">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Malan?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="180">
			<speaker>MR MALAN</speaker>
			<text>I have no questions, thank you Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="181">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Motata?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="182">
			<speaker>ADV MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;ve got none, Madam Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="183">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Any re-examination, Mr Jansen?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="184">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>None, Madam Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="185">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Matjeni, you are excused as a witness.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="186">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
		<line number="187">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Are we in a position to proceed with legal argument in relation to this incident?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="188">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>Madam Chair, I will, I would however just like to have a few minutes at least to get my sort of ideas in some sort of order.  If you intend starting now, we&#039;d just ask for a short adjournment.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="189">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m in your hands, I&#039;m seeking your guidance.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="190">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>I would obviously prefer to start tomorrow morning, Madam Chair, but again in that regard we&#039;re in your hands.  If you want to continue now, I would just ask the indulgence of 10 minutes or so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="191">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>We definitely would be quite amenable to granting you whatever indulgence in terms of minutes, you sought in order for you to proceed with your legal argument today.  Mr Prinsloo, what is your position?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="192">
			<speaker>ADV PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Madam Chair, if we may ask your indulgence, could we do it tomorrow morning?  If I&#039;m given time now for a brief while to get my mind organised, I could do it or attempt to do it, but I think it would be better suited if we could do it tomorrow morning, if it will suit the Committee.  I&#039;m in your hands, Madam Chair, as Mr Jansen also indicated to you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="193">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Ms van der Walt, what is your attitude about proceeding today, rather than tomorrow morning?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="194">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="195">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m not getting any translation.  I was however able to understand what Ms van der Walt was saying.  I think you&#039;ve switched off your button.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="196">
			<speaker>INTERPRETER</speaker>
			<text>I beg your pardon, Madam Chair, I was on the wrong channel.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="197">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What is your position, Mr Joubert?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="198">
			<speaker>MR JOUBERT</speaker>
			<text>Madam Chair, I will be able to proceed if we have a short adjournment, but I understand the predicament and I think it would probably be advisable to continue tomorrow morning.  But I&#039;ll be in your hands obviously.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="199">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MACHINE SWITCHED OFF</text>
		</line>
		<line number="200">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Having considered the request made by counsel and their preference to have legal argument presented tomorrow rather than today, I must say we as a Committee have decided to grant your wish to have your argument presented tomorrow, because we trust that you will be short, crisp and to the point tomorrow morning, probably better than you would have been this afternoon.  So we will postpone legal argument for tomorrow morning at 10 o&#039;clock.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="201">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>