<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY HEARINGS</type>
	<startdate>1999-11-16</startdate>
	<location>PRETORIA</location>
	<day>2</day>
	<names>JAKOB FRANCOIS KOK</names>
							<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=53898&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/1999/9911151210_pre_991116pt.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="122">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Are those your full names, Mr Kok.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>JAKOB FRANCOIS KOK</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>You may be seated.  Witness sworn in, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Page 119, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Kok, to prevent any confusion on the record, you are Japie Kok.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>You completed an amnesty application in the case of Dirk Coetzee and Bheki Mlangeni and you did not make use of a legal representative when you wrote this.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Do you confirm the content of this amnesty application as it appears in this application?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I do confirm it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Kok, in short, you heard the evidence of Wal du Toit, you also read his application documents. Do you confirm that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I do.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Steve Bosch came to you at a certain stage with a request, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Could you tell us in short what his request was and what you did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>Mr Bosch came to me on a certain day with an instruction from Col de Kock that a parcel must be prepared to eliminate Dirk Coetzee.  They came with a suggestion or an idea of a tape recorder or a radio, but we had to see what was practical.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>After the request did you talk to anybody about it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>I said to him that we have to go and get some clearance from Col du Toit, to get authorisation before we can continue.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Did he tell you who sent him to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>He said that de Kock sent him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>You then went to Wal du Toit.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>And you then told him about the request.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>And what was du Toit&#039;s reaction, what was your conclusion?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>That he already knew about the request that would come, and then he said that we can continue and start working on the package.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>You then had the authorisation to continue?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Did you have any reason to doubt that Col du Toit considered it or that he had instructions from a higher level?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>I had no reason to doubt him because he wouldn&#039;t have allowed me to continue without it being authorised.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>And just in short, although it was not within your discretion who the targets were or were not, in many cases you did not know who the targets were and as my learned friend said, sometimes you had a job card without knowing who the targets were.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, we were not involved in target analysis.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>But in this case it was told who the target was.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>And it was not a type of target that made you surprised in any way, under the circumstances?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Your brother, Mr Kobus Kok and yourself discussed the practical aspects of this matter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.  Myself and Sgt Bosch first went out to go and buy a walkman.  After Col du Toit gave us the authorisation we went to go and buy a walkman in order to look at the possibilities of the execution.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>And afterwards you started working on a practical way in which to do this and Kobus worked with you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>Yes, automatically I would draw Kobus in and we worked together and we planned it together and how we could practically execute this.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>And at a certain stage you got other responsibilities and you dropped out of this.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I was out of town for a few days and then Kobus continued with the project.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>And did you at any stage see the completed product, or the device?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>No, I never saw the final product, just when I came back he just told me that he did complete it and executed it and the package is on its way.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>So do you apply for amnesty for any offence and that is the attempted murder on Mr Coetzee and the death of Mr Bheki Mlangeni?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Do you confirm your application?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I do.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR BOOYENS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker>MR HATTINGH</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairman, I have no questions for this witness.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR HATTINGH</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Kok, initially you said that the idea was to use a tape recorder, who came up with the walkman suggestion?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, in the discussion while we talked about what our options were and we thought about what was the most practical and what would work the best, it came out at that stage that the cheapest thing would be a walkman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Was that with the first visit from Mr Bosch?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that was the first visit to me, that was after we got the authorisation and talked about it, that was the discussion.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Was that now after the discussion with your commander, Wal du Toit?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Or did it happen in the office of Wal du Toit?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="61">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>No, it was after we left du Toit&#039;s office and we came to my office and we started discussing the possibilities.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="62">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>But did you say it was better to use a walkman?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="63">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>It is difficult to say it was me, but it was a joint discussion and that&#039;s when we came up with this idea.  It was a joint planning session.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="64">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Because Mr Bosch said that he remembered that at one stage he was requested to go and buy a walkman, but before that he cannot remember where it was mentioned, and then he in the end went to go and buy it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="65">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>That may be his recollection, but I remember that that same day we drove off to go and buy a walkman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="66">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>That same day?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="67">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>Yes, out of my office we went, it was within ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="68">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>But wouldn&#039;t Mr Bosch have to put in a false claim to get funds?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="69">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>In practice it didn&#039;t work that you first get money and then go and buy it, if you had enough money with you, you could pay for it and then claim it back later.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="70">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Because I do not understand, he wouldn&#039;t have known at that stage that he had to go and buy something.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="71">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>We had instructions to go and make this thing work.  From Technical side we cannot do it if we haven&#039;t got something to work with.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="72">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>How many walkmans were bought, one or two?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="73">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>I think the first time we went we only bought one.  It could have been that at a later stage there was another request for another one, and that could perhaps support Mr Bellingan&#039;s evidence that he went with Mr Bosch to go and buy a walkman.  It could maybe confirm that.  ...(transcriber&#039;s interpretation)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="74">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Oh, I see.  Do you know anything about the tapes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="75">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>No, I cannot remember anything about tapes.  At that stage there was no mention made about the tapes, so I do not know what they are talking about.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="76">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Your brother, may he know something about that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="77">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>Yes, possibly.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="78">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson, no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="79">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR LAMEY</text>
		</line>
		<line number="80">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR RAUTENBACH</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="81">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Kok, I have a few questions that I would rather ask your brother, but just in general I would like to know from you, people talk about so-called pseudo operations where an item is manufactured and then used afterwards when there is a forensic test done on it - maybe AK47 bullets were found on the scene and it is said this and this happened or that a handgrenade was from Eastern Europe origin, what I would like to ask you is, concerning your unit - I do not know in how many incidents you were involved in and I do not want the details concerning this, in how many instances you were involved in the manufacturing of a type of device that can be used by the Security Police or Forces, but is it not possible to say in general whether it was general practice to use material that would lead the investigators on a different route?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="82">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>From our side we would definitely use - because we were in a war situation and the enemies from the Eastern Block countries weaponry was used, we tried as far as possible to use material and weapons that could not point fingers at the Security Branch. So you did make use of the Eastern Block countries, weaponry and materials from that country.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="83">
			<speaker>MR RAUTENBACH</speaker>
			<text>At that stage did you realise that at the Technical Department, concerning the equipment that you had, whatever it was, the smallest or the biggest, part of the material that you used, that it could point a finger away from you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="84">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>Concerning weaponry and explosives we did not use the equipment within, we could go to the Explosives Unit, because it was something that was seized every single day and I think South Africa was at that stage one of the biggest, the country with the most Eastern Block weapons.  And it was also mentioned in previous hearings that some of the weaponry was packaged by terrorists and in the onslaught they used material that was made in England.  If we used to something like that, we had to get the same material from England.  So it could be possible that we had that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="85">
			<speaker>MR RAUTENBACH</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m talking about detonators now.  Would you also have had access to various types of detonators?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="86">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it was possible to get detonators.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="87">
			<speaker>MR RAUTENBACH</speaker>
			<text>What was your rank at that stage?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="88">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>I think I was a Captain.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="89">
			<speaker>MR RAUTENBACH</speaker>
			<text>And your brother was also a Captain?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="90">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="91">
			<speaker>MR RAUTENBACH</speaker>
			<text>Just one aspect, Mr Kok.  Did you ever, or did you have any contact with for example - I think it would be pure coincident, but with for example, Mr Kritzinger who investigated this case?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="92">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>I knew him in another level, we were together on an officer&#039;s course, but I did not see him at that stage.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="93">
			<speaker>MR RAUTENBACH</speaker>
			<text>And you cannot recall that he for example, came to investigate the offices or to do a search?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="94">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he came to do a search of the offices.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="95">
			<speaker>MR RAUTENBACH</speaker>
			<text>Concerning the search, if he did search the offices one would expect that he would find material like as you said, had Eastern Block origin, or was it not there at that stage?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="96">
			<speaker>MNR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="97">
			<speaker>MR RAUTENBACH</speaker>
			<text>I think it may be better if we take that point up with your brother.  I have no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="98">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR RAUTENBACH</text>
		</line>
		<line number="99">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MS LOCKHAT</speaker>
			<text>Just one question, thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="100">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Did you expect that Mr Wal du Toit had the authority of Mr Helberg in this instance?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="101">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, as Mr du Toit explained it, certain work which was allocated to our offices and which was compartmentalised in our office and we had responsibility to him, or received instruction from Mr du Toit.  If he had clearance from Helberg, we never knew about that and we did not know whether it was necessary that he must clarify it with him.  We believed that his instructions or his command position was enough for him to give us instructions to do this work.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="102">
			<speaker>MS LOCKHAT</speaker>
			<text>But you believed that he had the authority to authorise this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="103">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I believe so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="104">
			<speaker>MS LOCKHAT</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson, I have no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="105">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MS LOCKHAT</text>
		</line>
		<line number="106">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>...(indistinct - no microphone)  Sorry.  When you bought the walkman, did they come packed up in a box?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="107">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>No, it was in a blister pack.  &quot;Hierdie plastiek verpakte kaarte wat die walkman was met die oorfone wat oor die walkman is.  So dit is in &#039;n plastiek, hierdie vinnig verpakte wat op die hakke hang.  Dit was so &#039;n stel gewees&quot;.  ...(no English interpretation)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="108">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So if it was ultimately packed in cardboard, you wouldn&#039;t know where that came from?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="109">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="110">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Just while we&#039;re at it.  Your recollection is only one walkman and one set of headphones at that stage.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="111">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson, because we started and we had to find out how to execute it.  It would be no use to buy two walkmans at the beginning if we do not know what we are going to do with them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="112">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>As far as you know there was probably another bought at a later stage, although you&#039;re not sure about it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="113">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>I can confirm that it was conveyed to me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="114">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="115">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Sorry, who told you that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="116">
			<speaker>MR J F KOK</speaker>
			<text>If my recollection serves me right it was my brother who told me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="117">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="118">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>No re-examination, thank you, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="119">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO RE-EXAMINATION BY MR BOOYENS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="120">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="121">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
		<line number="122">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>I call Jakobus Kok.  Page 97, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>