<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY HEARINGS</type>
	<startdate>1999-11-23</startdate>
	<location>JOHANNESBURG</location>
	<day>1</day>
	<names>NEO IGNATIUS PHAHLANE</names>
	<case>AM7293/97</case>
						<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=53950&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/1999/99112325_jhb_991123jb.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="122">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What language would he speak?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>MR PADI</speaker>
			<text>Sotho.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Your full names?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>MR PHAHLANE</speaker>
			<text>I am Neo Ignatius Phahlane.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker>INTERPRETER</speaker>
			<text>Excuse me Mr Chairman, may I ascertain if he can hear the translation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Pardon?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker>INTERPRETER</speaker>
			<text>I say may I ascertain whether he can hear the translation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Can you hear the translation Mr Phahlane?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>MR PHAHLANE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I do.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>NEO IGNATIUS PHAHLANE</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Please be seated.  Mr Padi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MR PADI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chair.  Mr Phahlane is applying for amnesty for the incident which occurred on the 1st of October 1989 in which a Sharpville police station was attacked, pursuant to which attack a person was injured.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker>MR MALAN</speaker>
			<text>That was Sgt Madibo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>MR PADI</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker>MR MALAN</speaker>
			<text>We have all the papers before us, we have the supplementary document which we have also read.  I note from the papers that the Commander K.K. and one of his other colleagues, had already received indemnity in 1990 for this incident?  Is there anything you want to add or will you just get him to confirm what is on paper?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>MR PADI</speaker>
			<text>I was hoping to get him to run us through his background and briefly relating to the incident if that would be okay with the Committee.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>MR MALAN</speaker>
			<text>What I want to suggest to you firstly, I assume you have discussed his application with him and that that is correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker>MR PADI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I did discuss it with him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>MR MALAN</speaker>
			<text>And I further assume that the supplementary affidavit which he has signed, was done recently, probably yesterday or today?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Have you seen it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>MR PADI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I have the one by ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>MR MALAN</speaker>
			<text>Oh, this is Madibo&#039;s statement.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>MR PADI</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker>MR MALAN</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, Madibo&#039;s statement, you have seen that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>MR PADI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that I have seen.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker>MR MALAN</speaker>
			<text>That seems to be in accordance with the application, there is no dispute of fact?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker>MR PADI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, there is no disputed facts.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker>MR MALAN</speaker>
			<text>So everybody is aware of the factual of it, and I am simply suggesting if you want to dispense with any oral evidence, by simply confirming the correctness of his application, then we can leave it to questions to proceed from there, and if you have anything to add which is not in there, do that, but don&#039;t repeat, that is simply my suggestion.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>MR PADI</speaker>
			<text>Okay, thank you, thank you Honourable Committee Member.   Can I get a directive again from the Honourable Committee Member, is it the suggestion that I run through the affidavit?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker>JUDGE DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Mr Padi, are you in practice?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker>MR PADI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I am in practice.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker>JUDGE DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>It is a tip to you that what we&#039;ve got before us, if we&#039;ve got problems, we will ask you to answer on that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>MR PADI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Let me probably take that cue, Mr Phahlane, you have read your application once more, have you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker>MR PHAHLANE</speaker>
			<text>I did not read it today, since I wrote it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But you know the contents of your application?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker>MR PHAHLANE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And that on the 3rd of the 11th month, you gave another affidavit under oath, this year?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker>MR PHAHLANE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And have you read the versions of the police whom you attacked at the police station?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker>MR PHAHLANE</speaker>
			<text>I did not read the police statements.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>In effect they are confirming what you are saying in your application and they say they have forgiven you.  Do you follow that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker>MR PHAHLANE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I do.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>In other words they are saying they are not opposing your application.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker>MR PHAHLANE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I do understand.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Do you confirm the contents of your amnesty application?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker>MR PHAHLANE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I do.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, that is all we wanted you to do, Mr Padi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker>MR PADI</speaker>
			<text>I am indebted to you Honourable Chairperson.  I just want to clarify some few issues, if that is okay.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it is your case.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker>MR PADI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Honourable Chair.  Mr Phahlane, at the time of the commission of the incident in question, which political organisation did you belong to?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker>MR MALAN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Padi, everything is in his application, he says that he was a member of the Vaal Youth Congress, he says he was Deputy President, he talks about the ANC, everything is in there, we have it before us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker>MR PADI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, what I am trying to get out of him is that when he committed this particular act, he was not doing it as a member of the Vaal Youth Congress, but as a member of MK.  That is exactly what I am trying to extract from him at this stage.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker>MR MALAN</speaker>
			<text>Please proceed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker>MR PADI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Mr Phahlane, were you a member of Umkhonto weSizwe at the time of the commission of this act?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker>MR PHAHLANE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I was a member of MK.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker>MR PADI</speaker>
			<text>And you were committing this act as a member of the Umkhonto weSizwe?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker>MR PHAHLANE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I did that under the command of MK.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker>MR PADI</speaker>
			<text>From your application it is stated that K.K. Smith was your commander, is that so?  Do you confirm that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker>MR PHAHLANE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="61">
			<speaker>MR PADI</speaker>
			<text>At this stage, Honourable Committee Members I think the rest of the information is covered from this, I will follow up with re-examination if there is any, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="62">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR PADI</text>
		</line>
		<line number="63">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Padi.  Ms Thabethe, any cross-examination?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="64">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="65">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You may proceed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="66">
			<speaker>MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.   Mr Phahlane, were you armed when you went to the police station?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="67">
			<speaker>MR PHAHLANE</speaker>
			<text>I was not armed.   The only person who was armed was K.K.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="68">
			<speaker>MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>Can you explain how it came about or why was the one policeman shot, Sgt Madibo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="69">
			<speaker>MR PHAHLANE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Madibo was shot because when we arrived there and they were holding them up, he was the person who resisted.  He took up his arm, so we had no alternative, but we had to shoot at him, because the reason why we went there was just to disarm them, so that we could use them for MK purposes because they were supporting the apartheid regime together with the soldiers, so we believed that by disarming them, we would be able to decrease the strength of the apartheid government.  Our aim was not to shoot him, it was only to disarm them and give those arms to the MK, so he showed resistance and he ended up being shot.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="70">
			<speaker>MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>You see, why I am asking you this question is because in the statement written by Mr Madibo, or Sgt Madibo, he indicates that the person who was carrying the firearm, it is on paragraph 4 of the first page, he says the person who was with you began shooting at them, what is your response to that statement or that averment?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="71">
			<speaker>MR PHAHLANE</speaker>
			<text>K.K. started shooting, but he was not shooting Mr Madibo, he shot another policeman who was running out of the police station, and that is when Mr Madibo took out his firearm, shooting at K.K.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="72">
			<speaker>MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chair, I have no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="73">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MS THABETHE</text>
		</line>
		<line number="74">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>We will follow the same procedure, Mr Padi, that if you have any re-examination, let the Committee also deal with questions which they need clarification, and thereafter you would re-examine in total, knowing the views or things elicited by the Committee Members, is that okay with you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="75">
			<speaker>MR PADI</speaker>
			<text>That is okay.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="76">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Mr Malan?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="77">
			<speaker>MR MALAN</speaker>
			<text>I have no questions, thank you Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="78">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Judge de Jager?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="79">
			<speaker>JUDGE DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>No questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="80">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Do you have any re-examination?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="81">
			<speaker>MR PADI</speaker>
			<text>I have no re-examination at this stage.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="82">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO RE-EXAMINATION BY MR PADI</text>
		</line>
		<line number="83">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
		<line number="84">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Is there anybody you are calling again in Mr Phahlane&#039;s case?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="85">
			<speaker>MR PADI</speaker>
			<text>No, there won&#039;t be any other persons.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="86">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Is that your case?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="87">
			<speaker>MR PADI</speaker>
			<text>That is my case.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="88">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Are you ready to address us?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="89">
			<speaker>MR PADI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I am ready to address you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="90">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>As always?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="91">
			<speaker>MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Chair, maybe I can just add for the record, that I spoke to the victims who are present here, they have been present since yesterday, patiently waiting, so I just want to put that on record.  But in my consultation with them, they did indicate that they are not opposing the application.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="92">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Nor do they want to say anything before argument?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="93">
			<speaker>MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="94">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="95">
			<speaker>MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="96">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You may proceed, Mr Padi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="97">
			<speaker>JUDGE DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>And they are satisfied that they are telling the truth?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="98">
			<speaker>MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>Maybe I should double check that Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="99">
			<speaker>JUDGE DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, because it corresponds with what they themselves say.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="100">
			<speaker>MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>Sure.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="101">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>That is the entering and the shooting and all that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="102">
			<speaker>MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Chair, when talking to them yesterday, they wanted to hear if he was going to come and say something differently, but it looks like nothing different has been said, so I don&#039;t think really they would want to say anything.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="103">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But in all fairness, because they took trouble to come here, we should afford you another opportunity just to speak to them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="104">
			<speaker>MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>Just to find out, sure.  I will do that quickly, Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="105">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  How long do you think it will take?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="106">
			<speaker>MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>A matter of seconds, Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="107">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So we need not leave?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="108">
			<speaker>MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>Certainly.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="109">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="110">
			<speaker>MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>The statements are the same, contain the same.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="111">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Padi, in view of the evidence before us, we are of the feeling that you cannot advance your argument any further, unless there are other things you want to highlight.  We are not stopping you, but if there is something that you want to highlight, really we would ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="112">
			<speaker>MR PADI IN ARGUMENT</speaker>
			<text>The only things that I wanted to highlight, Honourable Chair, relates to the fact that this application complies with the requirements of the Act.  All the requirements ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="113">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>We wouldn&#039;t have heard him if it didn&#039;t comply, if the application did not comply, we wouldn&#039;t have heard him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="114">
			<speaker>MR PADI</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  Beyond that, that is nothing else to say, except that we request that amnesty be granted.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="115">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Ms Thabethe?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="116">
			<speaker>MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chair, I have no opposition if amnesty is granted.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="117">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Phahlane, tomorrow morning we will be able to deliver a written decision.  We would have done it orally, but because its got to be processed and government gazetted, my oral decision would not go that far, but we promise that tomorrow, during the day, we will give that decision in that respect, and I want to thank the police for their cooperation that you are facilitating the process and you are appreciating very much.  We are indebted to you because you have accepted the conflict of the past, you do not say because you are victims, therefore we do not forgive.  We are very appreciative of that.  In our decision, whichever way it goes, either granting or refusing, we shall refer you to the Reparation Committee, then they will contact you shortly, but I am expressing our hearts to you as a Committee.  Thank you very much.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="118">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	This brings us to the end of the proceedings of the day.  We shall be commencing with the other five applications tomorrow, the 24th of November, Wednesday.  Those would be Ngubeni,  Mahlangu, Madonsela and Nhlapo and Zondo.  Thank you.  Have a good evening.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="119">
			<speaker>MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>As the Committee pleases.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="120">
			<speaker>JUDGE DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Did you get in touch with Mr Moto of the prison in connection with Mr Ngubeni&#039;s application?  He requested in paragraph 2, could you have a look at that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="121">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>We shall formally adjourn, this we will deal with in Chambers, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="122">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>