<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY HEARINGS</type>
	<startdate>2000-02-15</startdate>
	<location>PRETORIA</location>
	<day>2</day>
	<names>IZAK DANIEL BOSCH</names>
							<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=54041&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/2000/200215pt.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="125">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Bosch, what language would you prefer to use?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>MR BOSCH</speaker>
			<text>Afrikaans.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Do you have any objection to taking the oath.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>IZAK DANIEL BOSCH</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Please be seated.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Mr Bosch, you are also an applicant in these proceedings with regard to the abduction of Glory September Sedibe, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker>MR BOSCH</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Is it correct that your application for amnesty commences on page 32 of the bundle before the Committee and therein your initial application appears which was completed in your own handwriting and then there is a typed version.  And later when you acquired legal representation a more supplementary application is found from page 40 to 50.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>MR BOSCH</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Mr Bosch, is it correct that when Mr Sedibe was abducted you worked in the Piet Retief area with, amongst others, Mr Paul van Dyk?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>MR BOSCH</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>What was your rank at that stage?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker>MR BOSCH</speaker>
			<text>I was a Sergeant.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Is it correct that you went along into Swaziland when the abduction of Sedibe took place?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker>MR BOSCH</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Upon whose instructions did you go there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>MR BOSCH</speaker>
			<text>Upon Col de Kock&#039;s instruction.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>And what was your role throughout?  Did you go into the police station?  What was your role?  Did you go in with another vehicle other than the one that the abducted person went in?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>MR BOSCH</speaker>
			<text>I went in with another vehicle through Oshoek border post and I drove behind them at Nerston, but I did not go into the police station, I was quite a way from them.  Someone was with me, but I cannot recall who it was.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Was your role supportive in nature?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>MR BOSCH</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Were you involved in any assault of Mr Sedibe?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>MR BOSCH</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Did you know before you went into Swaziland that the abduction of Mr Sedibe would take place?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>MR BOSCH</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>And any stage thereafter - may I just refer you to page 48 of your application, you mention members of the Ermelo Security Branch, Chris Deetlefs, Frans Labuschagne and Freek Pienaar.  Mr Labuschagne has handed up a statement saying that he was not involved in the abduction, do you stand by that or is it possible that your reference to him is mistaken?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker>MR BOSCH</speaker>
			<text>It may be mistaken that he was involved in the incident that would be heard tomorrow or the day after, but I know there were other people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>What I would like to ask you, the Nerston/Amsterdam incident, you were also involved there.  I cannot recall, but this took place a day before or after Sedibe&#039;s abduction.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>MR BOSCH</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>You applied for amnesty in that instance.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker>MR BOSCH</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Where Mr Labuschagne was also involved.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>MR BOSCH</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Is it possible that Mr Labuschagne was in the area there but you mistakenly place him at this incident?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker>MR BOSCH</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>And then on page 48, paragraph 2, you state that Sedibe after he was questioned and then he disclosed information about ANC safehouse and houses from which the ANC operated in Swaziland.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker>MR BOSCH</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Is your recollection clear about this, with regard to this specific questioning of Sedibe, or could it have been a long while after this?  How do you recall it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker>MR BOSCH</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I recall we were at Piet Retief and Col de Kock was with us and we went in early the morning and at two houses, we searched two houses and we found some documents and those documents were brought back to the RSA.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>But Mr de Kock&#039;s evidence is that it was not - it did not have anything to do with Sedibe&#039;s abduction, but there was something like that at a later stage.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker>MR BOSCH</speaker>
			<text>That may be possible, Chairperson, I just recall that we searched some houses in Swaziland.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Were you yourself tasked with the questioning of Mr Sedibe?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker>MR BOSCH</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>And then on page 49 you confirm your political objective.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker>MR BOSCH</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson, I have no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR LAMEY</text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR HUGO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Bosch, if I understand your evidence correctly you were in a vehicle that was in an almost convoy formation when you moved back across the border.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker>MR BOSCH</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker>MR HUGO</speaker>
			<text>And there may have been one or two other persons in your vehicle, of which the identities you cannot recall right now.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker>MR BOSCH</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker>MR HUGO</speaker>
			<text>Can you recall - and please tell us if you cannot, where you stopped the first time when you crossed the border back to South Africa?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker>MR BOSCH</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, if I recall correctly it was not at the border post, it was in-between the border post and Piet Retief, somewhere along the way we stopped.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker>MR HUGO</speaker>
			<text>And can you recall what happened there exactly?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker>MR BOSCH</speaker>
			<text>I think we passed them to tell the people in Piet Retief that they were on their way.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker>MR HUGO</speaker>
			<text>And can you recall why they stopped and whom they met there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker>MR BOSCH</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson, I cannot recall.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker>MR HUGO</speaker>
			<text>I have no further questions, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR HUGO</text>
		</line>
		<line number="61">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>No questions, thank you Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="62">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR PRINSLOO</text>
		</line>
		<line number="63">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>No questions, thank you Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="64">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MS VAN DER WALT</text>
		</line>
		<line number="65">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR LEOPENG</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, just a few questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="66">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Bosch, is it your evidence that you were not involved in the assault of Mr Sedibe?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="67">
			<speaker>MR BOSCH</speaker>
			<text>Correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="68">
			<speaker>MR LEOPENG</speaker>
			<text>Did you see assault of Sedibe by other members of the South African Police during his abduction?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="69">
			<speaker>MR BOSCH</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I saw Mr Sedibe when they unloaded him in Piet Retief, I saw he had a cut over his nose and his eyes were swollen and that is all.  But I was not in the vehicle where he was assaulted.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="70">
			<speaker>MR LEOPENG</speaker>
			<text>So it could have been possible for everyone to have observed the braises on his face?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="71">
			<speaker>MR BOSCH</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson, one could not miss it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="72">
			<speaker>MR LEOPENG</speaker>
			<text>No further questions, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="73">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR LEOPENG</text>
		</line>
		<line number="74">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>No questions, thank you Honourable Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="75">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MS PATEL</text>
		</line>
		<line number="76">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>No re-examination, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="77">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO RE-EXAMINATION BY MR LAMEY</text>
		</line>
		<line number="78">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="79">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Bosch, did you at any stage see Mr Visser?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="80">
			<speaker>MR BOSCH</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson, I saw him at Piet Retief.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="81">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Where in Piet Retief?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="82">
			<speaker>MR BOSCH</speaker>
			<text>I think it was at the safehouse.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="83">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Can you recall when it was?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="84">
			<speaker>MR BOSCH</speaker>
			<text>The same evening when we returned from Swaziland, Chairperson. - or the following day, I cannot recall, but it was quite confusing.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="85">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>It would appear that you think it was in the dark.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="86">
			<speaker>MR BOSCH</speaker>
			<text>I think so, I don&#039;t know why, but that is what my memory tells me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="87">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>You are really not assisting us, Mr Bosch.  Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="88">
			<speaker>JUDGE KHAMPEPE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Bosch, you are obviously not correct with regard to the evidence you&#039;ve stated in your written application on paragraph 47 of how you came to know of Mr Sedibe&#039;s whereabouts, when that is taken with the evidence already given by Mr Deetlefs, is that not so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="89">
			<speaker>MR BOSCH</speaker>
			<text>What I meant here, Chairperson, is that the Security Branch of Ermelo received information that Mr Sedibe was detained in Swaziland.  That is how I recall it, I do not recall who gave this information.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="90">
			<speaker>JUDGE KHAMPEPE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  Thank you.  That is all, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="91">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, thank you, you&#039;re excused.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="92">
			<speaker>MR BOSCH</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="93">
			<speaker>MR LEOPENG</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, can I ask just one question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="94">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What&#039;s it about?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="95">
			<speaker>MR LEOPENG</speaker>
			<text>It&#039;s appearing on page 57, where he said that he was present when Mr Sedibe was interrogated and assaulted.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="96">
			<speaker>JUDGE KHAMPEPE</speaker>
			<text>Page what?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="97">
			<speaker>MR LEOPENG</speaker>
			<text>57, 5-7.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="98">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>But that&#039;s Mr Fourie&#039;s statement, Mr Leopeng.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="99">
			<speaker>MR LEOPENG</speaker>
			<text>I beg your pardon.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="100">
			<speaker>JUDGE KHAMPEPE</speaker>
			<text>His affidavit ends on page 51.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="101">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, thank you, you&#039;re excused.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="102">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
		<line number="103">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Have you got a similar short one?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="104">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>My last applicant is Mr Fourie, Chairperson, I don&#039;t think that is going to be so short.  I would suggest - I spoke to him a little while ago, he&#039;s a bit held up or so ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="105">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Okay, if he&#039;s not going to be that short, then we can adjourn till tomorrow.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="106">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>I would request an adjournment, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="107">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Is there anybody else that&#039;s got a shorter witness?  Is anybody appearing for Vermeulen?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="108">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, Honourable Chairperson, I thought that I&#039;d canvassed this with you in chambers, where Mr Wim Cornelius had indicated that they&#039;re withdrawing the application, that his client had in fact mistaken this incident for the Msibi incident and would have addressed us when it came to the Msibi incident.  So that application is in fact withdrawn.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="109">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And Nofomela?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="110">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Nofomela has already testified.  The transcript of his testimony is in fact before you, Honourable Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="111">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And Fourie?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="112">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s the last applicant that is meant to testify.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="113">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Leopeng, how many witnesses, if any, have you got to call on the merits?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="114">
			<speaker>MR LEOPENG</speaker>
			<text>Chairman, just one.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="115">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>They&#039;re going to take on the merits?  They will testify to the merits?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="116">
			<speaker>MR LEOPENG</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  ...(indistinct) the wife briefly - with the assistance of the Committee, the wife is going to say the information which has been provided to her by Mr Sedibe, so I&#039;m not sure that it&#039;s going to be hearsay or not.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="117">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Well I think you best look up the law before you lead her, just check the law about the veracity of that kind of evidence.  Just check it out because I&#039;m not too sure myself whether it&#039;s evidence that we can take.  You say only one?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="118">
			<speaker>MR LEOPENG</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="119">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Anybody on this side going to call any extra witnesses?  So we&#039;ve got two witnesses tomorrow.  We&#039;ll adjourn till half past nine then tomorrow.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="120">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, may I just enquire, is the Msibi matter going to start tomorrow?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="121">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Well we are going to have to decide tomorrow morning and see how quick or how short it&#039;s going to be.  It may not start, we&#039;ll have to play it by ear tomorrow.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="122">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Shall we make arrangements to have the applicants ready in case we proceed tomorrow?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="123">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Well in any case even if we postpone it they&#039;ll have to be present.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="124">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>As it pleases you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="125">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>