<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY HEARINGS</type>
	<startdate>2000-03-20</startdate>
	<location>PRETORIA</location>
	<day>1</day>
	<names>ANDREW CHAUKE</names>
	<case>AM5487/97</case>
	<matter>KILLING OF MR MASINGA</matter>
					<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=54087&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/2000/200320pt.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="406">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>ON RESUMPTION</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>We are now going to proceed with the matter of Andrew Chauke, Reginald Simelane, Alfred Simelane and Robbie Mabuza.  As far as I can see, the legal advisers all remain the same.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The same as we announced for the previous matter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, just in relation to implicated people, as to the notifications, we have notified Joseph Motsepe who is here today, Chairperson, and Clement Modau, who is also present today, Chairperson.  And in relation to the victims, it is the deceased, Benjamin Masinga.  His brother Charles Masinga is representing the family, Chairperson.  Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker>JUDGE DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>The two implicated persons, has it been confirmed that they didn&#039;t apply for amnesty?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson, and Mr Brian Koopedi will also just give us just a little statement in relation to the two implicated persons, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Right, are you ready, Mr Koopedi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>I am ready, thanks Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>...(inaudible)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson, the little papers I&#039;ve given to you is the - it&#039;s going to be the testimony by the applicants and for you to follow better as they give evidence we should make those copies available, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Chairperson, perhaps for the record, my name is Brian Koopedi, I appear for the - it&#039;s a difficult one to say, for the applicants in this matter, four applicants and two implicated persons, Chairperson.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Perhaps it is important for me at this stage, Chairperson, to state that the four applicants together with the two implicated persons, were involved in the incident for which amnesty shall be sought.  Chairperson, one of the implicated persons, Mr Clement Modau, has not applied for amnesty.  His belief was that because he was granted indemnity for him to come into the country and he had disclosed this event, he laboured under the impression that he has the necessary pardon and has not applied.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	The second implicated person, Mr Joseph Motsepe informs me that at the time when application forms were being completed he was stationed in Kimberley, he went to see an attorney in Kimberley, completed amnesty application forms and left those forms with this attorney.  Attempts to trace this attorney has been fruitless, all I could get was that this attorney is in the Justice Department.  We are not saying they should be joined as applicants, but what we are saying Chairperson, in terms of full disclosure we are merely giving an explanation as to why they did not apply when perhaps they should have applied, Chairperson.  Thank you.  We are ready to proceed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Right, carry on.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>The first applicant in this matter, Chairperson, will be Mr Andrew Chauke.  May he be sworn in, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>ADV SIGODI</speaker>
			<text>What language is he going to speak?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>He can be sworn in in English.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>ANDREW CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson, we will proceed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Chauke, is it correct that you are an applicant in this matter which has led to the killing of a person, Mr Masinga?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it&#039;s true.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>I will refer you to the bundle of documents before this Honourable Committee.  Is the form appearing on page 3 your application form?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>And on page 8 there is a signature, is that your signature?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s true, that&#039;s my signature.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>No you have prepared a statement to assist you in giving testimony to this Honourable Committee, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Would you please proceed with the statement which shall be your evidence-in-chief.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR CHAUKE</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Chairperson and Committee Members, including Mr Masinga&#039;s family ...&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, can I disturb you for a moment?  Shall we mark this Exhibit A.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR CHAUKE</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I, Andrew Chauke, I joined the Congress of South African Students in 1984.  I was a student at Saulsridge High School.  I became a member of the Student Representative Council.  I served in the SRC together with my co-applicants, being Reginald Jabu Simelane, Alfred Simelane, Robbie Bongani Mabuza, Joseph Motsepe and Clement Modau.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>		Since COSAS was an affiliate of the United Democratic Front, we were introduced into the politics of the African National Congress.  From the many meetings and conferences that we attended we met with MK cadres who taught and trained us.  We were however not trained in the use of weapons then.  We were ordered to form an underground unit of MK, which was to operate in the Atteridgeville and Pretoria areas.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>		Our main task was to popularise and execute the campaigns of the United Democratic Front, the African National Congress, to enhance the downfall of the apartheid regime.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>		We would from time to time distribute anti-government pamphlets and posters.  We would also popularise school boycotts and protests.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>		I was the Commander of this underground cell.  However, all the actions taken by this unit were discussed and agreed upon by all present.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>		The police, soldiers, councillors and council police were all regarded as the enemy of - their main duty in the township was to suppress all political activities and to also arrest and disillusion political activists.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>		Coming to the issue of the late Mr Benjamin Masinga, our unit knew Benjamin Masinga as a policeman who was stationed in town and who was nicknamed Rambo.  As he harassed people in the township, Rambo was notorious among us student activists as he would boast about his position as a policeman.  There had been an attack on him by other comrades, not us, who successfully took his firearm, but he somehow escaped from these comrades.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>		On the 19th of April 1986, our underground unit was in a meeting at my home at 35 Serote Street.  We were busy building and preparing petrol bombs as we were planning an attack on the house of another policeman.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>		At about 20h00 whilst we were planning this attack, a lady a came into my home and called me outside.  She told me that Rambo was at the house opposite my home.  Rambo apparently had a girlfriend at that house.  I realised that Rambo was a more significant target.  I went into the house, told my comrades about the presence of this target in the area.  We immediately and unanimously agreed to attack and kill him.  We thought it would send a louder message if we could take him out of the house and kill him at a public place, so that his death may be known.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>		As we were busy building petrol bombs, we took the petrol we had, sticks and an axe and proceeded to the house.  I asked Clement to go and quickly find other activists as we wanted all the activists to see that the notorious Rambo has finally met with the strong arm of revolution.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>		I also ordered Joseph not to enter the house with us but to keep guard outside, to warn us if there will be any danger coming.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>		I myself, axe in hand, was the first one to go inside the house.  I saw Rambo seated in the dining-room.  I said &quot;there he is&quot; and I went to him and attacked him with an axe.  My comrade had sticks and stones.  They also participated in the assault.  We then dragged Rambo out and took him to Kabo Primary School, which was nearby.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>		On the way to Kabo Primary School I ordered Joseph to hand over the petrol he was holding and that he must stay behind and keep a lookout for the enemy forces if they would come, and also advised Clement and the others that we had taken Rambo to Kabo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>		Upon arrival at Kabo we continued to assault Rambo, who looked unconscious from the assault at the house.  Alfred then poured petrol over him and Bongani set him alight.  We then left the scene. 	When we left, Clement had not returned and I did not know where Joseph was.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>		I was arrested after three days and the case was subsequently withdrawn.  I left the country in 1988 to join the African National Congress formally and underwent military training in Angola.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Now Mr Chauke, after having said what you&#039;ve said, did you receive any financial benefit or personal benefit out of this attack and killing of Mr Masinga?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Well truly speaking to answer you there, I didn&#039;t receive anything from whosoever or whatsoever.  That is why in this particular day I myself, even my fellow comrades were so proud and happy that at least if we can meet the family of Mr Masinga and they should at least come and hear our statements and our commitment during that period of the struggle.  So ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Well what I was about to ask you was, you have perhaps somehow alluded to this, but for purposes of clarity I believe one should ask you if you think there was a political motive and a political objective covering this act.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, there was.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>And what would be those political reasons?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Well as I&#039;ve already stated in my statement that I&#039;ve already read to the house, (1) during that particular period I was an activist, a member of the known Congress of South African Students, as well as a supporter of the United Democratic Front.  By then the African National Congress was banned.  And as I&#039;ve already stated we had an underground cell which was commanded by me.  We had comrades who timeously, more especially MK cadres, who visited our underground formation in order that no, they should really direct and politicise us in terms of how our kind of tactics can be used in order to overthrow the then apartheid regime.  That is why I believe that this action is politically motivated.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Now inasfar as you can remember - one knows this happened some years ago, but inasfar as you can remember, do you think that you have fully disclosed  all the relevant facts to this Honourable Committee?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I believe I&#039;ve explained everything what happened.  ...(indistinct) maybe the other way around, I wasn&#039;t going to feel or to see it necessary to apply to the TRC in terms of what happened, so I believe I&#039;ve told the Truth and Reconciliation Commission the truth.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Now perhaps just to make sure that you get an opportunity for this, is there anything you would want to say to the Masinga family, relatives and friends?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  Actually what I would like to say to the family of the late Mr Benjamin Masinga, I know it&#039;s very painful in order to find that you lost the beloved one in the house or maybe the guy was the breadwinner or whatsoever, but what I would like to emphasise to the family of Mr Masinga, I&#039;m very, very sorry in what happened.  So that is why I applied for amnesty and then I would be happy if the Committee, I mean the family of Mr Masinga could just go back and revise the situation by then.  You know the country was at war, truly speaking, and then you wouldn&#039;t know that no, by then during the apartheid time, one would join the force to suppress a political organisation or political activities whatsoever.  So I feel, even myself, that they are hurt, but it was this trouble.  So that is why I&#039;m asking for their apology.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="61">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, that will be the evidence-in-chief for this applicant, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="62">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR KOOPEDI</text>
		</line>
		<line number="63">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairperson, Honourable Committee Members.  There&#039;s only a few questions that we&#039;d like to ask the concerned applicant in this matter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="64">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Chauke, you&#039;ve alluded to that at some stage you were arrested, is that so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="65">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="66">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>And during your arrest did you at any stage appear before a Court of law?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="67">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s true, I did appear.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="68">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>And having appeared before a Court of law, did you at any stage plead to the said offence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="69">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>May you please repeat your question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="70">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Did you plead to the said offence, that &quot;I plead, I Mr X, plead guilty or not guilty to these and my defence, my plea explanation is X, Y, Z, did you do that at any stage?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="71">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I did plead.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="72">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;d like to refer the Honourable Committee Members to page 96 of the bundle. - page 95, excuse me, from page 95 onwards.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="73">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Chauke, how did you know the girl that called you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="74">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Pardon?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="75">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>How did you know the girl that called you?  You stated that some girl - in your evidence-in-chief you stated that some girl called you whilst you were having a meeting at your place, how did you know her?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="76">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Actually the lady stayed there almost opposite my house, that&#039;s how I knew her.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="77">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>What&#039;s her name?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="78">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Her name is Linkie.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="79">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>It&#039;s Linkie?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="80">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="81">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>When you said she was staying opposite your house, did you grow up together?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="82">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>No, no.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="83">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>For how long had you known her, on this particular day?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="84">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>I knew her for almost a period of three months because even myself, there at 35 Serote, I was not residing there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="85">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>So are you in essence saying that you&#039;d been at 35 Serote, Atteridgeville, for about three months?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="86">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s right.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="87">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Did you know the deceased in this matter?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="88">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>No, I didn&#039;t.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="89">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>What was the relationship between the deceased and - excuse me.  My apologies, Committee Members.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="90">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	What was the relationship between Linkie and the deceased?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="91">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>What I can say is the relationship between Linkie and the deceased was that the deceased married Linkie&#039;s sister.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="92">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>So would you agree with me when I say that the deceased had on occasion come to this particular house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="93">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="94">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Are you saying you only saw him on that particular day?  Was it for the first time that you saw him at this residence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="95">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>The deceased?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="96">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="97">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>No, it was on that particular day only.  As I&#039;ve stated in my statement, the deceased was famous in the township insofar as the political activists.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="98">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Ja, that is granted.  I&#039;m now referring to him being at this particular house.  Would you agree with me when I say he used to come on occasion to this particular house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="99">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Ja, that I cannot answer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="100">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Prior to the date in question, had you seen him in this house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="101">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Pardon?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="102">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>Prior, before the date in question, had you seen the deceased in this house at this address?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="103">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="104">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>So you were seeing him for the first time on this particular day, is that so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="105">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s right.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="106">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>And you knew that he was married to Linkie&#039;s sister, is that so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="107">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s what I said.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="108">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>So in - you stated again that on this particular day you were having a meeting where you were preparing petrol bombs and you were advised by Linkie that this chap is in the house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="109">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="110">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Would you elaborate on Linkie&#039;s participation in the whole thing.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="111">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, what I can say there is that as Linkie knew me there as a political activist and then it was sort of in support of political changes in overthrowing the apartheid regime.  He knew that no, in the township or wherever, all over South Africa, that no cops were regarded as targets, that is why she came to me and told me that no, there is a target in the house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="112">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>So are you in essence saying Linkie had her brother-in-law killed because he was a police officer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="113">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>No, that I cannot answer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="114">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>So if we take the matter further regarding Linkie, she called you, you went out, you went into this house.  There&#039;s mention of Linkie having switched off the lights, can you put is in the light of all that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="115">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Well according to that, as I&#039;ve already told the Committee here, that that of Linkie switching off the light there, what I&#039;ve read was the statement which I made and is the true statement of whatever I know.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="116">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>So you don&#039;t know anything about Linkie having switched off the light?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="117">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>No, I know nothing about that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="118">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Linkie just called you, and what did she do thereafter, did she call you and went back into the house or she called you, she said &quot;guys there&#039;s a target at our home&quot; and then she sat with you?  What happened, what happened of her?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="119">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>What happened of her actually, Mr - I don&#039;t know how ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="120">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Nyawuza, Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="121">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Nyawuza Sir, she called my outside as I&#039;ve already stated in front of the Committee, then she told me that there is a target in the house there.  Then what happened, I said to her &quot;no problem, we&#039;ll sort that out&quot;.  I went back inside the house.  As to where did she go by then, I don&#039;t know.  And I entered into the house, I explained to my comrades that no, there is a situation, it&#039;s this and this and that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="122">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>And when you went into the house to attack the deceased, was she there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="123">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>No, she wasn&#039;t there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="124">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Who had the axe?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="125">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>I had the axe.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="126">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>And did you say that to the Court?  Did you say you had the axe to the Court?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="127">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>To the Court of Law?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="128">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="129">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>No, I didn&#039;t say that, I had reasons for that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="130">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Who did you say had the axe?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="131">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>I would say by then as one can explain the situation of what happened in Court, even you yourself Mr Nyawuza, you will recall by the time that this incident happened and more especially of a person of Mr Benjamin Masinga&#039;s calibre, the country was at war and in Court they would never allow a person to just go and agree and only that no, I did this, this and this.  I wanted to protect myself against - maybe I could be found guilty and be hanged by that time.  So that is why I didn&#039;t actually disclose the whole truth to the Court by then, because by then the Courts would never listen to whatsoever statement of any political activist being arrested and being tried.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="132">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chauke, how many of you had been arrested?  Of the six of you that I see here, how many of you had been arrested at the time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="133">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>I was the first one to be arrested.  As I&#039;ve already stated, in three days I was arrested and then the rest of the comrades then followed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="134">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>All of them were arrested?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="135">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s right, Mr Nyawuza.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="136">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>So at the time of your plea all six of you were arrested and all six of you were comrades, is that so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="137">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s right.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="138">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>And you are stating that you didn&#039;t tell the Court that &quot;I, Andrew Chauke, had the axe on this particular day, but Clement my comrade had it&quot;, because you didn&#039;t want to be hanged, so you wanted Clement to be hanged.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="139">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>So well to answer your question there, I cannot say that I wanted Clement to be hanged, it was the other way round, I needed a scapegoat.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="140">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>So in needing your scapegoat you had to put somebody on the danger line, being Clement Modau, if I&#039;m not mistaken.  Is that Clement Modau that Modau that you are referring to?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="141">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s right, Mr Nyawuza.  You know I wonder if you were once arrested during the course of the struggle whatsoever.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="142">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>No, I wasn&#039;t.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="143">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>You wasn&#039;t.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="144">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>No, Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="145">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>So let me tell you the situation actually what was happening there.  You see, the cops, the police will come and arrest you and after arresting you they would never treat you the same like what is happening presently, you would be tortured, beaten, things like that, so that no, you must make a confession in order that that confession they should just use it against you and your fellow comrades.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="146">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>But Mr Chauke, I believe that we have gone past that stage of an investigating officer being taken to Court, pianos being taken and you being charged.  You were now in a Court of law where you had a Magistrate presiding over the matter, where you had a Prosecutor who was leading evidence for the State, you had the right to say whatever happened.  This is during the plea stage, we had gone past the investigation.  The torturing came with the investigation and when the IO felt that this matter is now ready for trial, he had gone past the torturing stage.  My question is extremely simple and straightforward.  All six of you were comrades.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="147">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s right.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="148">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>If all six of you were convicted of murder, all six of you were going to be hanged because as you&#039;ve stated, Mr Masinga was of a calibre that necessitated the Presiding Officers at that particular time, to impose a death sentence.  So if you say you told the Magistrate, the Presiding Officer on that particular day, that you were not having the axe, Clement was, and your version of saying no, Clement was having the thing is that you avoided being hanged.  So my question is, so you wanted Clement to be hanged, is that so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="149">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Maybe Mr Nyawuza, you are repeating the very same thing that you have already asked and I believe I did answer your question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="150">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>You haven&#039;t responded to my question.  What was your response?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="151">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>I did respond to your question, Mr Nyawuza.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="152">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>What was your response?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="153">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>I told you that no, seeing that knowing the Security Forces by that time, they use force actually you see, if a person is arrested he was going to be tortured and whatsoever.  That is why I said now, this statement which I made in the Regional Court, wherever I appeared and during that presence I was escorted by the very same torture of mine and those people threatened that no, if you are not going to implicate the statement to the Magistrate&#039;s Court, on our return back from Court you will be dead in the cell.  That is why I said ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="154">
			<speaker>JUDGE DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chauke, in fact you&#039;re telling us that at that stage you told lies to the Court, you didn&#039;t tell them the truth.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="155">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s right, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="156">
			<speaker>JUDGE DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>I think the only concern that Mr Nyawuza has is why did you put the blame on one of your comrades, why didn&#039;t you blame somebody else?  Now you&#039;re blaming him and bringing him into trouble.  Could you explain why you chose to put the blame on him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="157">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>I chose to put the blame on him because I was tortured.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="158">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="159">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	You stated before this Committee that you knew the deceased and further that you knew that ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="160">
			<speaker>JUDGE DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, he said that he heard of the deceased, he didn&#039;t know personally but he knew about him.  He was a well-known policeman in the vicinity.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="161">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s true, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="162">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;ll rephrase my question then.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="163">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	You knew about Rambo, you hadn&#039;t seen him personally, is that so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="164">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="165">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>So on this day in question you were seeing him for the first time, is that so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="166">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s right.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="167">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>But you knew that Rambo was a brother-in-law to Linkie, is that so as well?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="168">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>You see, Mr Nyawuza, actually if you can go back to my statement that I&#039;ve already written here, this statement explains clearly of what I knew about him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="169">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>So Mr Chauke you stated before this Committee that there was no personal gain in whatever you were doing, is that so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="170">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s right, Mr Nyawuza.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="171">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>So your killing of Rambo was to destabilise, for want of a better word, the working of the police officers and in essence affecting the whole system of apartheid, is that so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="172">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s true, Mr Nyawuza.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="173">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chauke, you didn&#039;t know that there was a problem between the deceased and his wife, would you have known that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="174">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>I didn&#039;t know about that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="175">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  Because the version of the victims would be there was friction between the wife and the deceased.  In actual fact the deceased had at some stage been a resident at the address in which he was found and killed by yourselves and they were in separation during this process and on this fateful day he had come to his in-laws to collect some items that belonged to him, that is how he met his untimely death.  Would, Mr Chauke, there have been somebody else at the house besides the deceased on this particular day?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="176">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Well to answer you there, Mr Nyawuza, myself and following comrades, when we entered that house there was nobody inside that house.  That is why I&#039;ve mentioned clearly in my statement, because I was the first guy to enter into that house.  Maybe the other way round though, there were people watching you see, that I cannot disclose.  But when I entered there, I entered with my six comrades and then we carried out this murder of Mr Masinga.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="177">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;ve got no further questions, Mr Chairman, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="178">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR NYAWUZA</text>
		</line>
		<line number="179">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="180">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Chauke, I just want to take you back to your statement - that&#039;s Exhibit A for the record, just the second paragraph, you said that you went - the third line of that paragraph, you said that you went for training, can you just elaborate on that for us?  What kind of training did you undergo and who trained you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="181">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>The last paragraph?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="182">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;ll just read it to you.  You said</text>
		</line>
		<line number="183" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;From the many meetings and conferences that we attended, we met with MK cadres who taught and trained us.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="184">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>My question to you is, what training did you undergo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="185">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>If you can further read the statement here, it does answer your question.  We were however not trained in using weapons.  The training that we had was political, to be politically conscious, we should understand the constitution properly of the United Democratic Front as well as the mother organisation, the African National Congress, of which it was banned by then.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="186">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>So it wasn&#039;t formal training per se, it was more educational in a sense?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="187">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s right.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="188">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>And then, who delivered the conferences and the meetings?  Who spoke to you in relation to this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="189">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s ...(indistinct) I say that by then we had MK cadres who then infiltrated the country without being identified and then as one can remember, by then people used to - more especially the MK, used combat names.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="190">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>So you can&#039;t give us any names?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="191">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>No, I&#039;m not ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="192">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>And combat names, combat names for instance?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="193">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Combat names yes, that I can give, but now as an underground cell, the way it was operating, the following day you find that no, they send a new face that you don&#039;t even know that will just come and tell you and give you his combat name, that&#039;s all.  Deliver his educational speeches, political pamphlets that were supposed to be distributed to the masses and leave the country.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="194">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>How old were you when this incident occurred?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="195">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>By 1986 I was 28 years - 18, because I was born on the 7th, 1968.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="196">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>So you were 18 years old?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="197">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s right.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="198">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>You said just in the third paragraph, that you were ordered to form an underground unit of MK, who ordered you to form this unit?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="199">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>As I&#039;ve already explained that the persons who ordered to us to form this underground MK cell, is those MK cadres.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="200">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>Surely you must be able to give us even a codename or something.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="201">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is - I&#039;m not afraid, that I can disclose because they were using combat names.  One can say - you see combat names, maybe I can say Jack Magoba, then you won&#039;t believe maybe it&#039;s a combat name, but now it&#039;s a name and surname.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="202">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chauke, just answer the question.  What was the person&#039;s combat name that you knew of, who ordered you to form that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="203">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>That was Raphael Molebatsi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="204">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>Can you repeat that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="205">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Raphael Molebatsi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="206">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>Was that his combat name?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="207">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s right.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="208">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>And then in the fifth paragraph you say that you were appointed as the Commander basically, who appointed you as the Commander of that unit?  Was it the same person or what?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="209">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Actually there as we had those different cadres visiting our underground cell, there was a need whereby we cannot all be responsible in terms of executing different tasks of the organisation, so ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="210">
			<speaker>JUDGE DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>The question is straightforward, who made you Commander?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="211">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>It&#039;s Mr Jeffrey Sibiya.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="212">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>And then just on page 2, the second paragraph, you said that you were in a meeting, now we know that the applicants and the implicated persons were at that meeting that you called, that was just before you attacked the deceased, who was all in that meeting besides you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="213">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>All the applicants who are sitting here.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="214">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>Anybody else?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="215">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Nobody else.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="216">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>And then you went further, you stated that you were building and preparing petrol bombs as you were planning to attack another policeman&#039;s house, was that plan actually executed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="217">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>No, it wasn&#039;t executed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="218">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>Why wasn&#039;t it executed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="219">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>It was disturbed by the arrival of this lady who told us that no, there is a target in the house.  Then I realised that Rambo was the more significant target than the one which we planned to go and attack.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="220">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>And what did you do with those petrol bombs?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="221">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>With these petrol bombs, since well that we&#039;re not trained in arms whatsoever, we used petrol bombs as our main weapons because you that no, if maybe we are going to attack more especially a police vehicle or a soldier&#039;s vehicle, you know that the petrol bomb will have much effect, that those people realised that no, there are people who are defending themselves.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="222">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>Then I just want to ask you a question in relation to the state the deceased was in before you poured the petrol over him and burnt him.  Was he still alive at that stage?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="223">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Well truly speaking, the deceased was unconscious.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="224">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>He was unconscious.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="225">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Ja, he was unconscious.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="226">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  And then just one other question in relation to the axe, I see that Reginald mentions - on page 45 of the bundle, Chairperson, he stated that you hit the deceased with the axe.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="227">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="228">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>At paragraph 7 of page 45, Reginald states - well it&#039;s actually the Investigating Officer that questions Reginald, and he states</text>
		</line>
		<line number="229" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Hy deel my verder mee dat hy gesien het hoe Andre die oorledene met &#039;n tang agter die kop slaan.  Daarna het Clement die man met &#039;n byl ook agter die kop geslaan.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="230">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>What is your comment on that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="231">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Well my comment to that is this, I&#039;ve already mentioned personally what happened.  I think that may be asked to Mr Reginald Simelane, because I&#039;ve said what exactly happened and that&#039;s what ...(indistinct)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="232">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>And then page 52 there&#039;s another statement by Mr Reginald, dated the 29.01.&#039;88.  It&#039;s on page 52 of the bundle, in the fourth paragraph he also states</text>
		</line>
		<line number="233" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Ons het toe ingegaan en Andre het die polisieman met die tang geslaan.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="234">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>And then he goes on further, he says -</text>
		</line>
		<line number="235" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Toe het Clement gevolg.  Hy het hom met die byl geslaan.  Toe hy het geval.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="236">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>What do you say about that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="237">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>But that Mrs Coleridge, I can refer that as - compare that with the very statement that I&#039;ve argued that this chap maybe was under pressure and force of the Security Forces tortures, that is why he mentioned such things.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="238">
			<speaker>JUDGE DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Had you beforehand decided, all of you, that you&#039;ll blame Clement, because he&#039;s now saying Clement used the axe, you said he used the axe?  Did you, before you went to Court, decide that you should put the blame on Clement?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="239">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="240">
			<speaker>JUDGE DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>How did it come now that he mentioned that it was Clement who used the axe and you said it was Clement who used the axe?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="241">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>That is why, Mr Chair, that I&#039;ve already answered in that question, as to how did he was trying to - maybe he said that Clement used the axe.  I can answer it the way as it is similar to my statement due to torture.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="242">
			<speaker>JUDGE DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Ja, but how did you decide to blame the same person?  Isn&#039;t that because Clement didn&#039;t apply for amnesty now and you&#039;re changing the story to protect him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="243">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="244">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I can understand you, if you have committed the act and are being tortured, you are trying to put the blame on somebody else, but Reginald didn&#039;t commit the act, he didn&#039;t hit him with an axe, so why should he now be putting the blame for hitting him with an axe on the wrong person, why didn&#039;t he mention you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="245">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>That I cannot answer because what happened, Mr Chair, we were not living in the very same cell, the other people were taken, be tortured in Pretoria North, the others Atteridgeville, the others behind the railway stations.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="246">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>Can you just tell us, your other comrades at the scene of the incident, the house, can you just tell us each applicant, what his role was in the attack?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="247">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that I can tell.  As I&#039;ve already stated because it is also written in my what-you-call ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="248">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>You just broadly stated on page 3, the third line, you said</text>
		</line>
		<line number="249" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;They also participated in the assault&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="250">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Can you just tell us who the &quot;they&quot; were and what their roles were?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="251">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>So as I&#039;ve already mentioned here that I ordered Joseph to hand over the petrol he was holding and that he must stay behind and keep a lookout for the forces if they would come, and also advised Clement and the others that we had taken Rambo to Kabo.  So coming to your question, here it is stated in the last paragraph</text>
		</line>
		<line number="252" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Alfred poured petrol over him ...&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="253">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="254">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, just stop there.  I&#039;m not talking about the incident where he was burnt and taken away from his house, I&#039;m talking about the time when he was in the house where the assault took place.  I want to know what each person did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="255">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;ve already stated it here in the second paragraph, I said</text>
		</line>
		<line number="256" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;And I went to him and attacked him with an axe.  My comrades had sticks and stones.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="257">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Referring to the complainant(sic).</text>
		</line>
		<line number="258" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;They participated in the assault.  We then dragged Rambo out and took him to Kabo Primary School.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="259">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chauke, either you don&#039;t know what your other comrades had done at that particular time, you can tell us that, or you could see what they were doing at the time.  And you&#039;re saying they had sticks and stones, did they hit the deceased with the sticks and stones or were they just in possession of the sticks and stones.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="260">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s right they did - no, the did hit the deceased with the sticks and stones.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="261">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>Now please Mr Chauke, who hit the deceased with the sticks?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="262">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>As I&#039;ve already mentioned here that my comrades had sticks and stones, because I&#039;ve ordered the two comrades, that is Clement Modau and Joseph Motsepe to stay alert outside, so Reginald Simelane hit Mr Masinga with a stick, Alfred Simelane also hit him with the sticks and stones.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="263">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>So they threw him with the stones.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="264">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Ja.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="265">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>And then just another question.  You stated - all the applicants stated in their application forms that Benjamin harassed the community, can you just tell us what did that entail?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="266">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Well that one can say as members of the student organisations we were unlawfully holding meetings and then what the State used to do in terms of if they can hear that there is a gathering, illegal gathering in a certain township, they sent the police force there and then what Mr Masinga was doing - you know a person is very much to be, you can see that no, in that particular vehicle there&#039;s a person is notorious there you see, by means of firing teargas to the students.  And in our gathering, maybe in the evening or the following day after there it would happen that maybe there is a comrade who fell during incident of shooting and whatsoever.  Now as student activists, one student would give that information that now you see, a certain cop there in that vehicle is the one who is calling himself Mr Rambo, that is why he was so notorious.  That&#039;s how I can answer that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="267">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>So who actually gave you the information regarding Benjamin?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="268">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>The person who gave the information regarding Mr Masinga - I just can&#039;t understand your question clearly, meaning who gave information that where he is or?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="269">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>That he was targeting the community and harassing the community and that he was actually a target.  Who told you that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="270">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>As I&#039;ve already explained that we are as student activists holding meetings and then one wouldn&#039;t know who is that particular person in an illegal gathering who is speaking, if a person is a student activist, wants to voice his voice, he just raises up his hand and then ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="271">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>Just why I&#039;m asking you that question is, firstly you had another target in mind, you had another policeman, you had your petrol bombs, you were ready to go and attack someone else&#039;s house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="272">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s right.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="273">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>And then on the spur of the moment it changed and you targeted Mr Masinga.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="274">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s right.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="275">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>Now I just want to understand that.  You didn&#039;t know the person or anything like that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="276">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>No actually to answer that question there, what we were planning for - because the very same policeman which he was on our schedule for attack, it was just not a matter of that we were just going there to attack his house so that he can feel that no, a cop has been made by the United Democratic Front at that time that no, police officers, soldiers, should resign and join the democratic forces.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="277">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>So did you have a schedule as you just said now?  That the same policeman was on your schedule, did you have something like that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="278">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="279">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>And can you just explain to us what your schedule consisted of, who was on that schedule of yours?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="280">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>You see this policeman, I don&#039;t even know his name but I knew him as a uniform policeman and then according to our underground meetings that we had - during the night or during meetings we do conduct our own investigation that no, this certain policeman who is really refusing to join the forces where does he stay.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="281">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>And then just Joseph, you said that he had the petrol can, is that Joseph Motsepe?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="282">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s right.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="283">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson, I have no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="284">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MS COLERIDGE</text>
		</line>
		<line number="285">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Re-examination?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="286">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Nothing in re-examination, thanks Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="287">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO RE-EXAMINATION BY MR KOOPEDI</text>
		</line>
		<line number="288">
			<speaker>JUDGE DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>You&#039;ve said you underwent military training in Angola, the last sentence of your statement.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="289">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, yes, Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="290">
			<speaker>JUDGE DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Where in Angola?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="291">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Where in Angola?  I went to Luanda, from Luanda I was taken to Richard Bhani Molokwana military training camp in the eastern direction of Angola.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="292">
			<speaker>JUDGE DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Which training camp?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="293">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Richard Bani Molokwana training camp.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="294">
			<speaker>ADV SIGODI</speaker>
			<text>I just want some clarity on your association with the lady who came into the house to tell you that Rambo in the house opposite you.  Did she know that on that day you were planning to attack a policeman, any policeman?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="295">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>No, she didn&#039;t know because as I&#039;ve already explained that no, we were working as an underground what-you-call, we were working underground by then.  What she knew only was that I am the political activist in that area.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="296">
			<speaker>ADV SIGODI</speaker>
			<text>So what I want to find out is why did she come to tell you that there was a policeman there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="297">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>She came to tell me that there was a policeman in the house because of she knew and she heard some various calls from the United Democratic Front, COSAS, that no, at this stage in time people should isolate police and soldiers because these people they are the ones who are disturbing the way forward to democracy.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="298">
			<speaker>ADV SIGODI</speaker>
			<text>In other words, she came to you because she wanted you to do something about this policeman?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="299">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>What I can say there is I cannot answer for her, what I can say is she came there knowing that we are political activists and then we are the people who can try and solve the situation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="300">
			<speaker>ADV SIGODI</speaker>
			<text>And you say that you didn&#039;t know this policeman before, you&#039;d never seen him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="301">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s right, ja.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="302">
			<speaker>ADV SIGODI</speaker>
			<text>So when you entered the house what steps did you take to make sure that the person whom you attacked was in fact actually a policeman?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="303">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>May you please repeat your question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="304">
			<speaker>ADV SIGODI</speaker>
			<text>I want to know, when you entered the house you found him sitting there alone, is that right?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="305">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="306">
			<speaker>ADV SIGODI</speaker>
			<text>And what steps did you take to confirm that he was in fact the desired target?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="307">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>As I&#039;ve already mentioned in my statement, it&#039;s the second paragraph there, that when this lady came she came and told me that no, there is a policeman that is Rambo inside the house and then I imagined that name, ...(indistinct) is that notorious cop who is destabilising our political activists in this township.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="308">
			<speaker>ADV SIGODI</speaker>
			<text>So when you entered, the first person you saw you just assumed that he must be the policeman that you were told about.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="309">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>I didn&#039;t assume, the lady told me that he&#039;s a policeman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="310">
			<speaker>JUDGE DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>What bothers my colleague, it could have been the owner of the house sitting there, how did you know it&#039;s a policeman and not an innocent man sitting there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="311">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Because you know we had - as comrades we had a belief that any kind of an informer wouldn&#039;t just disclose a false statement to comrades because they knew by then that comrades were people who didn&#039;t take any information that wouldn&#039;t lead them to the correct channel.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="312">
			<speaker>ADV SIGODI</speaker>
			<text>So when she told you that there is a policeman or there is a target in the house, what else did she say to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="313">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Nothing.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="314">
			<speaker>ADV SIGODI</speaker>
			<text>She just left her home, came to your house, called you outside, spoke to you alone and said to you &quot;there&#039;s a policeman in the house&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="315">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s right.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="316">
			<speaker>ADV SIGODI</speaker>
			<text>But then so what, what could she possibly expect you to do?  Did she say anything else that she wanted you to do?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="317">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>No, she didn&#039;t, she came there as a person who was just coming to highlight the comrades that no, there is a target situated in a certain house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="318">
			<speaker>ADV SIGODI</speaker>
			<text>Did she say there is a target in the house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="319">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s right, that&#039;s what she said.  She said there&#039;s a policeman there and it&#039;s a target and she mentioned the name of Rambo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="320">
			<speaker>ADV SIGODI</speaker>
			<text>So she knew that you were targeting policemen.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="321">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>She knew that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="322">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And she said the name Rambo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="323">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s right, Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="324">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Will you please look at the bundle at page 11, well that is the typed version, at page 12 is the handwritten version.  Is that a letter written by you to the Amnesty Committee?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="325">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s the letter, Chairperson.  That&#039;s right.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="326">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>In which you say</text>
		</line>
		<line number="327" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Sir, I killed Mr Masinga because he was a former South African Police.  He was defending the policy of the former apartheid regime.  Mr Masinga was not active in politics, instead he was against politics.  By then South Africa was at war and the former SAPs and SADF members were ordered by the apartheid regime to kill, arrest, detain and abduct political activists who were members of the democratic movements who were fighting the former apartheid regime.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="328">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Is that what you wrote?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="329">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Sir, Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="330">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Right, thank you.  And now one other matter I&#039;d like to clarify.  You&#039;ve told us a bit about your giving evidence and that was on the 25th of April 1986, six days after the killing, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="331">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Which page was that, Chairperson?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="332">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Page 95.  The bottom of the page, the last paragraph you say</text>
		</line>
		<line number="333" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;The sister-in-law of the deceased, the young woman, had told us there&#039;s a policeman in the house, we must come and kill him and she will go and look for forces to kill the policeman.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="334">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Did you say that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="335">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chair, I never said that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="336">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So the record is wrong?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="337">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Ja, this record is wrong.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="338">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And so you went, it is recorded as you&#039;re saying</text>
		</line>
		<line number="339" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;She then went to the shebeen.  After about 10 minutes I followed her.  I went there to call her.  She came and said there aren&#039;t any people there.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="340">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Did you say that?  Did you go and call her from the shebeen?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="341">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairman.  As I&#039;ve already indicated in my statement where I met the lady and I did not.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="342">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, so once again the Court record is defective?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="343">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="344">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And it&#039;s then recorded as saying</text>
		</line>
		<line number="345" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;She said that she would go into the house and turn off the light as the policeman was in the sitting-room.  He was in the chair and he was asleep.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="346">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>No, that she did not mention to me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="347">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>CHAIRPERSON</text>
		</line>
		<line number="348" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;After the light was turned off she called us and we went into the house.  The person who went in first was Clement.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="349">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="350">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So all this is wrongly recorded, wrongly interpreted?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="351">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Chairman, if one can take a thorough trace and make a very thorough trace, most of these statements that time when we were tried, Mr Chairman, they were solemnly(?) written by the cops.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="352">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>This was evidence you gave before the Court, it was not something written by a policeman.  This is the recording of the evidence given before the Magistrate.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="353">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>I do understand what the Chairperson is saying, that is why I&#039;m saying that I am denying that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="354">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>It was written by the cops, it was testified to by you.  What I have been reading from is, as your counsel will explain to you, is a transcript of the Court record.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="355">
			<speaker>JUDGE DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>And it was a tape recording by Lubbe Opnames, like we&#039;ve got a tape recording here.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="356">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="357">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And you say all this is wrong, you didn&#039;t say any of what I have read to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="358">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Chairman, as I&#039;ve already indicated while I was asked by the attorney, Mr Nyawuza, that all this other incident that one confessed during that time, it was in terms of defending himself that one mustn&#039;t be prosecuted.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="359">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But this isn&#039;t confessing, this isn&#039;t defending yourself, this is merely telling what happened.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="360">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="361">
			<speaker>JUDGE DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>And you go on, it&#039;s stated here</text>
		</line>
		<line number="362" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Clement had an axe with him.  Clement hit him on the forehead with the axe.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="363">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Did you say so in Court, or is this also wrongly recorded?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="364">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>That is why, Mr Chairman, as Mr Chairman can say that all this what-you-call, a record, the main reason that I made the one to say this is true, it was that one wanted to be, not be prosecuted by the Court of law.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="365">
			<speaker>JUDGE DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>No, what I&#039;m asking you now, what I&#039;ve read to you, was that also wrongly recorded or was it in fact correctly recorded as your statement in Court?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="366">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>This Mr Chairman, as I&#039;ve already answered that no, I came here to tell the Committee, the Commission, about exactly what happened.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="367">
			<speaker>JUDGE DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Ja, no I&#039;m not asking you that, listen to the question please.  I&#039;m asking you whether this was wrongly recorded or whether it was correctly recorded.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="368">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>It was correctly recorded.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="369">
			<speaker>JUDGE DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>But the rest of the previous paragraph was wrongly recorded, according to what you&#039;ve told us a minute ago.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="370">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s right, Mr Chairman, as I&#039;ve already explained to the Chair and the Committee that no, for me to say the previously that were not correctly recorded, I couldn&#039;t actually clearly understand what Mr Chairman wanted to put this as the what-you-call, as one what I&#039;ve said or as one said this according to the Investigation Officer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="371">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I still don&#039;t understand.  What I asked you was, &quot;did you say this in Court?&quot;, and you said &quot;No&quot; it&#039;s not what you said.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="372">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>That is why I reiterated to Mr Chairman, I did get the clarity from Judge de Jager there, so presently to rectify what I&#039;ve answered to you, Mr Judge, I said it&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="373">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So this is what you told the Magistrate?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="374">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="375">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You told the Magistrate that you went looking for this young woman at the shebeen, you called her out of the shebeen.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="376">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>According to the - that is why I said that this statement is the statement of the, which was made by the then security officers who were investigating this thing.  And then I did explain to the Committee that during my taking to Court, I was escorted by the very same Security Forces who arrested me and then inside the vehicle they threatened me that no, &quot;you are going to talk this statement, you&#039;ve got nothing to do with your own statement&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="377">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So are you saying now that the Security Police told you to say that you followed this young girl to the shebeen and called her out of the shebeen?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="378">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s right, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="379">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>They made that up, it&#039;s not true.  That&#039;s what you&#039;re saying now.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="380">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>As I&#039;ve already said, Mr Chairman, that this statement is from the Security Forces.  I&#039;m having my ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="381">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I am asking you simply, is it true or not.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="382">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>It&#039;s not true, Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="383">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Not true.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="384">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>Ja.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="385">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And she didn&#039;t go in and turn out the lights.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="386">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="387">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="388">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, that is the evidence for this applicant.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="389">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>I would then ask permission to call in the next applicant, if there are no further questions for this applicant.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="390">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Who is the next one?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="391">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>We will call Simelane, Reginald Jabu Simelane.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="392">
			<speaker>JUDGE DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Could I just hear from the previous witness, who is &quot;seun&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="393">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Sorry Mr Chauke, could you tell me who is &quot;seun&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="394">
			<speaker>MR CHAUKE</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s Mr Joseph Motsepe.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="395">
			<speaker>JUDGE DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Thanks.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="396">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
		<line number="397">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, Mr Simelane is ready to be sworn in.  Reginald Simelane.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="398">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, before we go on with that, there was a lot said by the previous applicant and it appeared also from the portion that I put to him of the transcript of the evidence given at the trial, about this young woman whom he called Linkie.  Has she been notified as an implicated party?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="399">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, not according to my knowledge.  It&#039;s just that there was no name mentioned of this particular person, Chairperson, and so for that reason as well we were uncertain ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="400">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Well he mentions the relationship, it&#039;s not just some unknown person.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="401">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>I take your point, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="402">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Shouldn&#039;t she be notified?  And on the evidence we have heard and appeared, she appeared to have gone to call them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="403">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, just also if my memory serves me correct, it was also - I can&#039;t point you in the right direction, but I&#039;m sure I can find it, where one of the applicants state that they actually also approached this woman and they knew that this girl was the sister-in-law of the policeman, Chairperson, and therefore it didn&#039;t seem as if it was an implicated person but actually themselves went to this person, and I must just get the page reference.  So therefore in our minds, Chairperson, she wasn&#039;t an implicated person in the way the applicant is describing her now, but it was almost as if they as a group went to this woman or this girl and said, and almost said &quot;is he there&quot; for instance, &quot;is he at home&quot; or something to that effect, and therefore we didn&#039;t notify her, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="404">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I think it&#039;s something that should be looked into.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="405">
			<speaker>JUDGE DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>...(inaudible) put it to him then, that that was the case.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="406">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MACHINE SWITCHED OFF</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>