<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY HEARINGS</type>
	<startdate>2000-03-30</startdate>
	<location>PRETORIA</location>
	<day>3</day>
	<names>CHRISTO PETRO DEETLEFS</names>
	<case>AM5001/97</case>
						<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=54121&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/2000/200330pt.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="91">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker>CHRISTO PETRO DEETLEFS</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Deetlefs, you are the applicant in this matter, during which Mr Mosiane and three others were abducted from Swaziland.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>MR DEETLEFS</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And within the prescribed time you have submitted an application to the TRC, which appears in the bundle.  Your application is from page 15 to 17, and the facts pertaining to the matter can be found from 18 to 21, and then the political background from page 22 onwards.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker>MR DEETLEFS</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Do you confirm this as correct as it appears before you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>MR DEETLEFS</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>At that stage you were the Branch Commander of Ermelo, when this incident took place.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>MR DEETLEFS</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And as a result of your activities in Swaziland, you had informers within Swaziland itself.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>MR DEETLEFS</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did you also have an informer who was linked to the Swaziland Police?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>MR DEETLEFS</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And did this informer provide information to you regarding the victim, Mr Mosiane, and three others who were to be detained at this specific police station?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>MR DEETLEFS</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did you convey this information to Brig Visser?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker>MR DEETLEFS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, at a later stage I conveyed it to him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And was a decision taken to take action and did you receive an order from Brig Visser to take these persons from that place?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>MR DEETLEFS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And what was the purpose with this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>MR DEETLEFS</speaker>
			<text>To obtain information, because at that stage we were aware that these four persons were members of the so-called Special Operations group of MK.  They had come together on a large-scale in Swaziland.  To my opinion there was a large-scale offence which was being planned, which would include acts of terrorism and bomb attacks within the RSA, and I believed that it was vital for us to apprehend these persons in order to obtain information so that we could determine what exactly they were planning on doing within the RSA.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Do you confirm the evidence given by the previous applicant, Mr Pienaar?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker>MR DEETLEFS</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And with this abduction so to speak, from Swaziland, did you create the impression with the applicant that he would be killed should he not cooperate?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker>MR DEETLEFS</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, it was my intention in the vehicle.  I threatened to shoot him because the intention was to intimidate him so that he would be quiet and not offer any resistance.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And he was tied by Mr Pienaar.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker>MR DEETLEFS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And after that he was detained.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker>MR DEETLEFS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And you left Swaziland without a passport.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker>MR DEETLEFS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, we crossed the border fence without a passport.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Into the Republic of South Africa?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>MR DEETLEFS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And you then apply for amnesty for abduction.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker>MR DEETLEFS</speaker>
			<text>Correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Incorporated with that would be assault.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>MR DEETLEFS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And then you also apply for the fact that you left the Republic of Swaziland illegally and that you entered the Republic of South Africa illegally.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker>MR DEETLEFS</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And you also then apply for the illegal detention of the applicant in South Africa.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker>MR DEETLEFS</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Therefore you apply for any offence which may emanate from the facts as set out within your application.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker>MR DEETLEFS</speaker>
			<text>Correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>As well as for any delictual accountability which may emanate from this.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker>MR DEETLEFS</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did you do this out of malice, this abduction?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker>MR DEETLEFS</speaker>
			<text>No, I did not draw any personal advantage from this incident.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And this was for the benefit of the South African Police and the government of that time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker>MR DEETLEFS</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR PRINSLOO</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Prinsloo.  Ms van DER Walt, any cross-examination?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>No questions, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MS VAN DER WALT</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Mr Richard.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Sir, Mr Mosiane informs me that when he was arrested by the Swazi Police, he found that he was one of 12 MK operatives in the Manzini cells.  Would your informers have let you know that bit of information as well?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker>MR DEETLEFS</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson, I know that at a stage a large group of them was detained throughout Swaziland, so it is possible that he may have originally also have been detained at Manzini, but I don&#039;t know about it directly.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now he and the three others were removed from Manzini and moved to this particular police station near the South African border, was that also within the information conveyed to you by your informers?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="61">
			<speaker>MR DEETLEFS</speaker>
			<text>No, I simply the information that they were being detained in Bunja, I did not know that they had been detained at another police station.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="62">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>But it is common cause that when you arrived at the police station approximate to the South African border, the Swazi Police man, the single one, offered no resistance at all in handing the four cadres to you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="63">
			<speaker>MR DEETLEFS</speaker>
			<text>No resistance was given by the Swaziland Police whatsoever.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="64">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Indeed there was co-operation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="65">
			<speaker>MR DEETLEFS</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I wouldn&#039;t be able to say because I did not liaise with this person at all, this police officer, so I wouldn&#039;t say that there was co-operation, I just believed that he was intimidated and due to this, did not resist at all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="66">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now do you recall Mr Mosiane&#039;s physical condition when you took him from the Swazi Police?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="67">
			<speaker>MR DEETLEFS</speaker>
			<text>I cannot recall it that specifically, I cannot say whether he was assaulted prior to the time, I would not be able to tell you.  It is possible, but I cannot tell you definitely.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="68">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Wouldn&#039;t it have been a matter of concern that if he had been injured, that it was documented so that in due course you and the men working with you couldn&#039;t be blamed for it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="69">
			<speaker>MR DEETLEFS</speaker>
			<text>I beg your pardon, due to the noise outside I couldn&#039;t hear the question quite properly, could you repeat it please.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="70">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Isn&#039;t it so that if a person is taken into your care who is injured, it&#039;s prudent and wise and good practice to document his physical condition, so as to prevent the implication that he suffered the injuries while in your care?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="71">
			<speaker>MR DEETLEFS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, in terms of Section 29 he would have to be examined by a physician and any injuries that he had incurred would have to be documented.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="72">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Do you know when you was examined by a physician?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="73">
			<speaker>MR DEETLEFS</speaker>
			<text>Most probably due to the fact that this incident took place on the Saturday night, if I recall correctly they were detained in terms of Section 29 on the subsequent Monday, so it would have been on the same day that they were examined by the physician.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="74">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>However, there is no dispute from your evidence as I understand it, that you and your colleagues behaved and said things to Mr Mosiane that were intended to make him believe that if he did not cooperate and do as you wished, he would, as he says in his affidavit, vanish, disappear.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="75">
			<speaker>MR DEETLEFS</speaker>
			<text>That was the intention with the threat.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="76">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>And there&#039;s also no dispute about the fact that the rope was tied round Mr Mosiane&#039;s neck and tied to the handbrake of the car.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="77">
			<speaker>MR DEETLEFS</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="78">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>No further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="79">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR RICHARD</text>
		</line>
		<line number="80">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Richard.  Mr Steenkamp, any questions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="81">
			<speaker>ADV STEENKAMP</speaker>
			<text>No questions, thank you Honourable Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="82">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY ADV STEENKAMP</text>
		</line>
		<line number="83">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Adv Sandi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="84">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>No questions, thank you Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="85">
			<speaker>MR MALAN</speaker>
			<text>No questions, Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="86">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Deetlefs, you are excused.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="87">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
		<line number="88">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, I omitted to apply amnesty on behalf of Mr Pienaar, as far as any delictual liability is concerned.  Would that - I move this ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="89">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Well it flows from the actions taken.  If he gets amnesty on the others, then obviously any other offence and delictual actions would flow from that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="90">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairman.  That concludes the evidence of the two applicants I intend calling, Mr Chairman.  CHAIRPERSON:   Thank you, Mr Prinsloo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="91">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I call Mr Visser.</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>