<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY HEARINGS</type>
	<startdate>2000-05-03</startdate>
	<location>PRETORIA</location>
	<day>16</day>
	<names>LAWRENCE JOHN HANTON</names>
	<case>AM4076/96</case>
						<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=54150&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/2000/200503pt.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="531">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker>LAWRENCE JOHN HANTON</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>Mr Hanton, is it correct that you&#039;re an applicant in these proceedings and your application is correctly filed in the bundle found on page 56 on onwards?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>In your application you&#039;ve referred to the submissions of erstwhile, Gen van der Merwe, and you ask that these submissions be incorporated as part of your application.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>At the time of this incident were you a member of Vlakplaas, obviously in the South African Police?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>I was, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>And you were under the command of Col de Kock.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>Dealing with the incident of ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>If it wasn&#039;t so obvious that it was of the South African Police at the time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>I beg your pardon.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>They denied it existed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>As it pleases you, Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	You were however a member of Vlakplaas.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>If I may deal briefly with the incident.  Mr Hanton, is it correct that you were part of a group of people who planned a particular operation to be executed in Botswana?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>Correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>Is it correct that your task was simply to be part of, what you would refer to as a support team, who remained inside South Africa?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>You never entered Botswana at all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>You were aware of the fact that people could be killed in Botswana, and indeed people did die there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>And do you also admit that your action signifies some form of common purpose with those members who went into Botswana?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But did you make common purpose with them?  You agreed with they did?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>I agreed with them, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>For your participation in this operation, did you receive any reward?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>Is it then correct that you apply for amnesty for the offences of conspiring to murder;  two counts of murder;  two counts of attempted murder ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>How did you contribute to this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>Mainly in a support capacity, Mr Chairperson.  I remained at the base inside South Africa ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>At the border?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>No, at the base where we worked from at the dam where we were camped.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Ja.  How would you contribute to this operation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>I was in - I would say in order to help the others on their return, that is all I&#039;ve actually done.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Was your contribution essential to the success of the operation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker>JUDGE KHAMPEPE</speaker>
			<text>Were you not part of the planning of the operation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>I was, yes, Mr Chairperson, but I merely - I stayed at the base ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>No, but you were part of the planning.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker>JUDGE KHAMPEPE</speaker>
			<text>You planned the whole operation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>I was part of the planning, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>In the hope that it would be successful.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And you exactly knew - isn&#039;t that your contribution then, that you were party to ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>That would be my contribution, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Do you confirm the correctness of the application and also the political motive set out in your application found in the bundle?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>I do, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>And as I was saying, you ask for amnesty for conspiring to murder;  two counts of murder;  two counts of attempted murder, and also arson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Will you just repeat that slowly please.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>Conspiring to murder;  two counts of murder;  two counts of attempted murder, and arson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	That is the evidence.  Thank you, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR NEL</text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairperson, van der Merwe on record.  I have no questions for Mr Hanton.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR VAN DER MERWE</text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chair, Jansen on record.  No questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="61">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR JANSEN</text>
		</line>
		<line number="62">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chair, Cornelius on record.  I&#039;ve got no questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="63">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR CORNELIUS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="64">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Lamey on record.  No questions, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="65">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR LAMEY</text>
		</line>
		<line number="66">
			<speaker>MR HUGO</speaker>
			<text>I beg your pardon, Mr Chairman.  I&#039;ve got no questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="67">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR HUGO</text>
		</line>
		<line number="68">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairperson, I&#039;ve got just one point I would like clarity on from Mr Hanton.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="69">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Hanton, on page 59 of your application, the top paragraph which starts with &quot;After&quot;, on the last sentence you&#039;ve said:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="70" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;From what I&#039;ve understood from what they said, the operation was only partially successful.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="71">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Will you be able maybe just to explain, what do you mean &quot;from what they said, the operation was partially successful&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="72">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>By that I mean, Mr Chairperson, that it didn&#039;t go according to the original planning, that things went wrong.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="73">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>What went wrong actually?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="74">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>The fact that instead of just having the explosion, other things happened.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="75">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>Other things like what, Mr Hanton?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="76">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, as explained by the other applicants, the shooting of people at the target.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="77">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chair, I&#039;ve got no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="78">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR MARIBANA</text>
		</line>
		<line number="79">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Honourable Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="80">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Hanton, you&#039;ve stated in your application to us that you are in fact an Inkatha supporter, could you confirm whether you were in fact an IFP supporter at the time that this incident took place?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="81">
			<speaker>MR HANTON</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairperson, at the time I was a supporter of the National Party.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="82">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Alright.  Thank you, Honourable Chairperson, I have no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="83">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MS PATEL</text>
		</line>
		<line number="84">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Any further questions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="85">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;ve got no re-examination, thank you, Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="86">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO RE-EXAMINATION BY MR NEL</text>
		</line>
		<line number="87">
			<speaker>JUDGE KHAMPEPE</speaker>
			<text>I have no questions for Mr Hanton.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="88">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>I have no questions, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="89">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes thank you, you&#039;re excused.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="90">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="91">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
		<line number="92">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Is that all the applicants?  Anybody going to call any witnesses in support of the applicants&#039; cases?  Mr Maribana, what do you propose to do?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="93">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairperson.  Mr Chairperson, at this stage, on behalf of the victims I&#039;ve got instructions from two of the victims, Mr Chairperson, that they would like to give testimony before this Honourable Committee.  Just ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="94">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, call them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="95">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>Firstly, I will call Funi Steven Lesole.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="96">
			<speaker>JUDGE KHAMPEPE</speaker>
			<text>Won&#039;t you just spell that for us, Mr Maribana.  The surname as well as the name.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="97">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>Funi: F-u-n-i, Steven: S-t-e-v-e-n, and Lesole: L-e-s-o-l-e.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="98">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>L-a?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="99">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>L-e, Mr Chairperson, Lesole.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="100">
			<speaker>JUDGE KHAMPEPE</speaker>
			<text>Lesole.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="101">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="102">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>Excuse, Mr Chairperson, before we proceed we need earpieces if he&#039;s going to give evidence in his native language.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="103">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Lesole, which language would you prefer to use?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="104">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;ll speak Setswana.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="105">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Very well.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="106">
			<speaker>FUNI STEVEN LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="107">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Please be seated.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="108">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>As it pleases, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="109">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Lesole, it is correct that in 1988 you were a member of ANC.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="110">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="111">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>And it is correct that on the 11th day of December 1988, you were in Botswana at Ramatlabana.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="112">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>It was on the 10th of December.  I was at Diratapeng.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="113">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Lesole, let us say in December, or more particular, at the time of the attack, were you at that place that you have just mentioned, Diratapeng, in Botswana?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="114">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="115">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>And there is an incident which took place, whereby you were attacked by the Security officers, do you still remember that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="116">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I do.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="117">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>And it is correct that you were one of the people who were in structure Y on that day, or in the evening of the attack.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="118">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="119">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>And during consultation you indicated that you would like to put some of the things before this Honourable Committee, which you feel that they might be important to help the Committee when it makes a finding, is that so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="120">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="121">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>And just to confirm that it is correct that you don&#039;t dispute or put in dispute the fact that the said where you were on the day in question, was used as a transit house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="122">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="123">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>And there are a few things in order for us to put this thing clearly.  I want us to tackle these things in category - I mean in categorical order.  Firstly we&#039;ll start with the herd boys.  Do you still remember the names of the herd boys in this particular incident?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="124">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>I knew only one boy and the other one who came to visit this young boy.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="125">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>And then what is the name of the boy who came to visit at that place?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="126">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>His name was Rapula.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="127">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>And this Rapula, how can you tell this Honourable Committee about his role in politics?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="128">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>On our side as members of the ANC, he did not give any assistance to us, so we just saw him as a visitor at that house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="129">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>So if one understands you correctly, that he wasn&#039;t involved in politics?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="130">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>He was never involved in politics.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="131">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>And is this boy, Rapula, the one who was killed in the attack?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="132">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, he was killed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="133">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  Now let us go back to the herd boy you said you know, what is his name?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="134">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>His name was Kuntakana(?).</text>
		</line>
		<line number="135">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>And then, what was his role at that time?  As far as politics are concerned.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="136">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>We used him to send him to go and have a look for us at what was happening near the borders.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="137">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  And then there was this woman who was seen at the transit house, what is her name?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="138">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>Her name was Matiko Anna Lesole.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="139">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>What was her role as far as politics were concerned at that stage?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="140">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Was she family to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="141">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>She was my mother.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="142">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>And then my questions was, what role did she play at that particular time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="143">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>Her duty was to welcome the people and assist the people who were coming from Zimbabwe, into South Africa.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="144">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  Now let us go to the events which took place in the evening on Sunday.  How many ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="145">
			<speaker>JUDGE KHAMPEPE</speaker>
			<text>May I interpose, Mr Maribana.  By reference to people, are you referring to ANC activists?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="146">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that&#039;s correct, I&#039;m referring to the people who were coming from the training from other countries and coming into South Africa.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="147">
			<speaker>JUDGE KHAMPEPE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Maribana.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="148">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Madam Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="149">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	So I was just saying you know, let us go to the events which took place, Sunday in the evening.  How many MK members or ANC people were in structure Y?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="150">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>We were three in that structure.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="151">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>And do you still remember their names</text>
		</line>
		<line number="152">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>and if so, may you be able to give their names to this Honourable Committee?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="153">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>It was Moshengu, Sidwell and myself, apart from Kuntakana.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="154">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You, Moshengu and ...?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="155">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>And Sidwell.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="156">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>And during our consultation when I explained to you the evidence before this Honourable Committee, that there was evidence which says one person went out to urinate, do you still remember who was that person?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="157">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>It was myself.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="158">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>And may you be able maybe in your own words to tell this Honourable Committee that from the time when you went out, what did you observe and what have you done?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="159">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>When I went outside to urinate I saw white people outside, amongst them one of them said &quot;there he is, let&#039;s get him.&quot;  He was saying that in Afrikaans.  The other one patted me on my shoulder.  I shouted and I was informing the people who were in the house, I was making them aware.  I was not dressed at that time.  Then after he has patted me on my shoulder, I ran into the house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="160">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I had an AK47 in my room and I went to fetch that AK47, and I peeped through the widow at the side facing the dam.  I realised that they were lighting torches and then I shot towards that light and I told Kuntakana to ran with me.  We ran outside together with Kuntakana and we fled.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="161">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	After that, I realised that the people who were in the main house, that is my mother and my father, were standing at the door.  I shouted at them, I told them that we are being attacked by the whites, and they also started shooting with bazookas.  That is white people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="162">
			<speaker>JUDGE KHAMPEPE</speaker>
			<text>And where were you when they started shooting with bazookas?  Were you outside the two-roomed structure which has been referred to as Y?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="163">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>I was outside, just next to the main house.  	I also started shooting at them, but I only had one magazine with me at that time because my other bags were in the other room where Moshengu and others were sleeping.  So I didn&#039;t have time to run into that room.  As I was shooting at them - I continued shooting at them, enabling the people who were in the main house to run away.  But these people were shooting with other guns, very powerful guns that I didn&#039;t know which types of guns they were, but they were very powerful.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="164">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Then I realised that Rapula was scared and he ran towards the house again.  When he ran back to the house, they continued shooting at him ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="165">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>To which house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="166">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>He was running from the family house and he ran back to the family house again.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="167">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	After I finished my magazines they were continuing shooting, but at that time they had not yet demolished the house and the other group entered the house and the other group was also attacking the other part of the house. 	Then from the main house I could hear Rapula shouting.  I heard two shots from the main house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="168">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="169">
			<speaker>JUDGE KHAMPEPE</speaker>
			<text>Did you hear what he was saying as he was shouting?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="170">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>He was just screaming.  He wasn&#039;t saying anything, he was just screaming.  And the other one entered the house in which I was sleeping and he continued shooting there.  He shot three times in that house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="171">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="172">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>And at that stage, how far were you from the premises, structure X and Y?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="173">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>I was next to the place that we used for cooking.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="174">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>Okay, you may proceed.  And then?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="175">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>And then I saw the main house burning, the thatched house burning.  When I realised that I ran back.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="176">
			<speaker>JUDGE KHAMPEPE</speaker>
			<text>Was the main house made of thatch?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="177">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="178">
			<speaker>JUDGE KHAMPEPE</speaker>
			<text>And was there also a rondawel just behind the main house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="179">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, there was also a rondawel which we used as a kitchen.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="180">
			<speaker>JUDGE KHAMPEPE</speaker>
			<text>When you first saw the main house burning, what was the state of the rondawel?  Was it also burning at the about the same time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="181">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>No, it was not yet burning.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="182">
			<speaker>JUDGE KHAMPEPE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="183">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>And after that I heard the bomb from the house in which we were sleeping.  After that ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="184">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Wait now before you carry on.  You ran back to the main house, then what happened?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="185">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>No, I did not run back to the main house, I was just next to the two structures and I was watching as all these things were happening.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="186">
			<speaker>JUDGE KHAMPEPE</speaker>
			<text>During this period of the shooting, where was Moshengu and Sidwell?  Did you have an opportunity to observe whether they actually ran out of the Y structure?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="187">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>They did not manage to escape, because I only heard them cocking their firearms but I didn&#039;t see them going outside and I only saw the white people running into that house where they were sleeping.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="188">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>Okay you heard the bomb and then the structure in which you were sleeping was destroyed.  Do you still remember as to what happened to the people, more in particular Sidwell and Moshengu who were still there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="189">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>In that room where I was sleeping I only heard three bullets, so I don&#039;t know what happened to Sidwell and Moshengu.  After the white people had left, I went back and that&#039;s when I realised what had happened to them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="190">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	When I came back I saw Sidwell, he was still inside the house next to the door.  And then I went back to the house that caught fire, and in that house I could see a person, but he was already burnt.  I could see that it was a person who was lying there, and the other girl who was present showed me Moshengu.  I removed all the bricks which were on top of Moshengu and I realised that he was still alive at that time.  From there I went to get the donkey cart so that we could run away, because I was afraid of the Botswana soldiers.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="191">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What happened to Moshengu, you took him with?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="192">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I did take him with me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="193">
			<speaker>JUDGE KHAMPEPE</speaker>
			<text>Have you been able to establish the identity of the person who was burnt beyond recognition inside the main house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="194">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I later learnt that it was Rapula, and I knew that he ran into that house.  He used to sleep with the parents in that house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="195">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairperson, that is all from the witness, Mr Lesole.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="196">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR MARIBANA</text>
		</line>
		<line number="197">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Have you got any questions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="198">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;ve got no questions for the victims.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="199">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR NEL</text>
		</line>
		<line number="200">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr van der Merwe, have you got any questions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="201">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Chairperson, just one or two.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="202">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Lesole, your mother and father, as the people who this property belonged to - I take it this was their house.  Am I correct in saying that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="203">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>It belonged to a person who was working there.  That is my father.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="204">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>Was your mother and father active supporters of the ANC at that stage?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="205">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>My parents were supporters of the ANC.  My mother came to work with that man there and my mother used to stay with my father in Mafikeng and then she went to Botswana to stay with a certain man there and work with him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="206">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>Did they move there with the express intention of assisting in the struggle at that stage?  Is the reason why she moved there to assist in the struggle?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="207">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson, they moved with the intention to help the ANC with its struggle, until the whole family moved out there after this operation, then they went back to Mafikeng.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="208">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>The herd boy, Kuntakana, was he family of yours of how did he fit in, where did he come from?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="209">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>He was not a family, but he was a son to a man who was working there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="210">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>So was he a South African citizen or a Botswana citizen?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="211">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>He was a Botswana citizen.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="212">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>Your mother and father obviously realised that taking part in the struggle in the way that they assisted the struggle at that stage, that their lives were in danger and at risk, cooperating like this and making this transit facility available to the ANC and their cadres at that their stage.  Am I correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="213">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>I would not know and again, I would not speak on their behalf, but I believed they knew because when they participated in the struggle they knew that they were enemies to the white people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="214">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>Well let me put it this way.  You expected attacks on that facility earlier already, am I correct to say that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="215">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson, I did not have any expectation for an attack because we did not hope to be attacked in Botswana, but we knew that we would be attacked in South Africa.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="216">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>The premises - whenever there were cadres from Umkhonto on these premises, there would be firearms and weapons, am I correct to say that?  So the people were always armed when they came through there, or most of the time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="217">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>They did not come armed, but I would be the one who would be armed, then I would hand over the arms to them when they arrive.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="218">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>So you were the source of supplying them with weapons and arms as they entered South Africa, am I correct to say that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="219">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson, I would not give them to enter South Africa, they would only use those arms to guard the house and when they infiltrate South Africa I would not give them those arms.  Those arms were only used to protect the premises.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="220">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>So you had arms specifically assigned to yourself to protect the premises and just the transit facility.  They would be given the instructions(sic) inside South Africa, so they infiltrated South Africa without arms?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="221">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr van der Merwe, where are we going with this?  They went back to Botswana.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="222">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>No, we&#039;re not going back to Botswana.  If you look at the application or when it started, there were various attacks or - initially on transit houses.  This is not what&#039;s worrying me, but at the moment to make it clear to the Committee that everybody who was present at in this house was part of -or the people who participated in the operation were part of the government and you cannot say then that some are innocent and others are more innocent.  If a Defence Force attacks another country&#039;s Defence Force, you do not draw a circle around the chefs and say, we are not going to attack the chefs and only attack the soldiers.  That is the point that I would like to make.  But I will it there, I won&#039;t take it any further.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="223">
			<speaker>JUDGE KHAMPEPE</speaker>
			<text>Mr van der Merwe, I personally wouldn&#039;t like to be seen to be curtailing your cross-examine, if what you are saying is intended to assist us, I would have thought that you would have limited your cross-examination on Rapula, because I don&#039;t think any other person who actually fell under the attack of the applicants, was any person other than an ANC supporter, member or activist.  I think it&#039;s quite clear, that is not in dispute.  I mean, from the evidence of Mr Lesole himself.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="224">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Madam Chair, I am moving in that direction.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="225">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Lesole just to assist in, specifically the application of Mr Hoffman in this matter, these premises I take it at night, was it well lit, was it dark, what was the situation regarding light?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="226">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>Do you mean in the house or just around the premises?  Inside the house or just in the premises?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="227">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>Let&#039;s say both, describe both to us.  Tell us how much light there was inside the house and outside the house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="228">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Well let&#039;s put it this way ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="229">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>There were no lights in the premises because it was in a rural area, so at night it would dark.  So there would be no lights outside the houses.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="230">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Rapula you say was a friend of the herdsman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="231">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he was a friend to Kuntakana.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="232">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did he come there often?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="233">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, I used to see him at that place, though he would not come on a daily basis.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="234">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Age-wise, was he in the same age range more-or-less, as the herdsman?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="235">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>I am not able to testify on the age groupings.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="236">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>...(indistinct) similar?  More-or-less.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="237">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct, Chairperson, on my observation they would be on the same age.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="238">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>More-or-less how old were they?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="239">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>I would estimate their age, 14 to 15 years old.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="240">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="241">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And do you know whether Rapula knew that Kuntakana went to have a look out for you at the border?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="242">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t think he knew, because I instructed Kuntakana that it should be a secret.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="243">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And what time of day did this incident occur?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="244">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t understand, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="245">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What time of day or night did this attack occur?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="246">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>It would be around ten past twelve.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="247">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Now I don&#039;t know if I heard you correctly, did you testify that Rapula slept at that homestead sometimes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="248">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he used to sleep there sometimes because he used to visit there.  He used to stay at Klapeng, which is quite a distance from the place of the incident.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="249">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Would he sleep at the main house or at the house that you occupied?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="250">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>They used to sleep at the main house.  At that particular day I requested Kuntakana to sleep at that house because there were some people.  So he went to sleep at Kuntakana&#039;s(sic) room.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="251">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I see.  Would you say that Rapula, in the circumstances that prevailed there that night without lights, could have been mistaken for Kuntakana?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="252">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m not sure, Chairperson, it could have happened because they were of the same age.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="253">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Similar builds?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="254">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, they were similar in height and it was dark, that you would be able to make a mistake.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="255">
			<speaker>JUDGE KHAMPEPE</speaker>
			<text>And usually Mr Kuntakana used to sleep in the main house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="256">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson, Kuntakana used to sleep at the main house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="257">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Are there any other questions, Mr van der Merwe?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="258">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>No, thank you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="259">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR VAN DER MERWE</text>
		</line>
		<line number="260">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Jansen, have you got any questions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="261">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>A few, thank you Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="262">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Lesole, what is your present age?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="263">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m 35 years old, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="264">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>Can you remember when you joined the ANC?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="265">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>I started working with the ANC from 1984, then I went for training in 1986.  In &#039;84 I was working with the ANC, without training, helping my mother to help the ANC members, and then I was supposed to go for training in 1986, then I trained in 1986.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="266">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>Am I correct, I&#039;m not exactly sure of your birthday, but in 1984 you would have been round about 18 or 19 years old?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="267">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t remember how old I was at that time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="268">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>What year were you born?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="269">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>I was born in 1965.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="270">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>In 1984 were you helping your mother with the infiltration of ANC members into South Africa?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="271">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson, I was helping the ANC members to infiltrate the members of the ANC, because there were those who were not able to communicate in Setswana, therefore I would help to infiltrate them during the night with routes I identified to go through Mafikeng.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="272">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>Now you mentioned another man who was living in the main house, can you remember what his name was?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="273">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is Mr Tabane(sic)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="274">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>Just to avoid any confusion, he was not your father, was he?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="275">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="276">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>Do you know a first name, can you remember what his first name was?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="277">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct, I knew his first name.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="278">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>What was that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="279">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>That Tawana Molema.  Molema is the surname, Tawana is the name, the first name.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="280">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>Was that his ordinary residence, or did he also have another place where he was ordinarily resident?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="281">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>That was his house, and again he had another house in Mafikeng.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="282">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>Did his wife live in Mafikeng, in the house in Mafikeng?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="283">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>His wife has since died, because when I started working with them I found him not having a wife.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="284">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>But who was living in the house, was other family of his living in the house in Mafikeng?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="285">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>It was myself and Mr Tawana and Kuntakana and Kuntekana&#039;s brother who were staying in that house.  But I knew that he had three children and they were staying in the house in Mafikeng, they were not staying in Botswana.  In Botswana he was staying with Kuntakana only.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="286">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>Do you recall, or were you at any stage informed that Kuntakana had been arrested or had been interrogated by members of the South African Security Forces?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="287">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>I remember, Chairperson, because after he was detained he later informed me that he was arrested and then he was beaten by white people and he was told to work with them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="288">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  Now you surely, at that stage, must have realised that there is a very good chance that the South African Security Forces were observing that house ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="289">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Jansen, does it really matter whether this witness realised that or not?  In terms of the Act.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="290">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>Well, Mr Chair ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="291">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Let&#039;s assume that the worse scenario for your case is that he didn&#039;t know, as he&#039;s testified, that he was in danger, does it really matter?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="292">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, I will obviously argue that it does not, so I&#039;m afraid that there might be - I would like to also argue a further point, is that from an objective point of view, there was a danger that was known to the inhabitants of that house and ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="293">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Well does it matter that they knew or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="294">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>Well I think it assists my - I don&#039;t think it matters at the end of the day, Mr Chairman, but I think it does assist my case if they did know.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="295">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I think my colleague, Ms Khampepe, made it quite clear to Mr van der Merwe what the position was.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="296">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>...(indistinct), Chair ...(indistinct - no microphone).  Sorry, Chair, if it&#039;s not of crucial importance, I will not proceed with that ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="297">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t want to sound like I&#039;m stopping you, but ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="298">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>No, I accept that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="299">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>... it&#039;s rather - one doesn&#039;t know where this is going to, given the evidence before us already and what has been conceded.  In fact, all this has been conceded in your case.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="300">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  No, I accept that, Mr Chairman.  Mr Chairman, that is my last question, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s inadmissible, so maybe if he can just answer it because I have no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="301">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR JANSEN</text>
		</line>
		<line number="302">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I hope that&#039;s not your case that fell there.  Have you got any questions, Sir?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="303">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>I have no questions, thank you, Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="304">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR CORNELIUS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="305">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Lamey?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="306">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Just one or two questions, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="307">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Lesole, the arms and - the AK47s, the arms that you kept at the premises, and I think you also mentioned handgrenades, is that correct, that you kept there for protecting the transit facility - did I understand your evidence correctly?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="308">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="309">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Now where were these arms and handgrenades kept in that facility?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="310">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>I kept them at the house where I would put these people to sleep in.  I would inform them that they should have those arms to protect themselves whilst they were still in the transit house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="311">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>But in what did you keep it?  Was it ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="312">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Well Mr Lamey, he says at the house, does it matter whether it was in a cupboard or under a bed or wherever?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="313">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Alright.  You mean - I don&#039;t know whether you&#039;ve seen the sketch plan here, do you mean the structure Y, not the main house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="314">
			<speaker>JUDGE KHAMPEPE</speaker>
			<text>I think his evidence-in-chief was that it was kept in structure one, and to be precise, in the room that was used on that night, by Sidwell and Moshengu.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="315">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>And the arms and handgrenades were continuously kept in that structure, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="316">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, we&#039;d have them there all the time.  I would only remove them there when I go to Lebatse or in another place, but if there are people in that house, I would just leave them there for them to use them to protect themselves and the structures.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="317">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Now what prevented a visitor to those premises, like Rapula, who often visited the premises, to enter structure Y?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="318">
			<speaker>JUDGE KHAMPEPE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Lamey, what is the purpose of this line of cross-examination?  We have already I think, suggested what is of trouble to the Panel, and that is the justification for the killing of Rapula, and not the manner in which Rapula was killed.  And that&#039;s the only issue which I think can be traversed by the legal representatives acting on behalf of the applicants.  Otherwise I don&#039;t think there is anything which is in dispute, because the evidence from the victims is supporting the applicants&#039; case.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="319">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>No, I fully appreciate that and I do - I also just wanted to try and establish also perhaps knowledge which Rapula himself had about what was going on at that transit facility.  But if it doesn&#039;t take it any ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="320">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Lamey, perhaps, I think in - and I don&#039;t want to sound subjective, I think you&#039;d do your case a disservice and a disfavour if you traversed that line, because you may just get the wrong answers.  It&#039;s dangerous territory you&#039;re traversing.  You&#039;ve heard what my colleagues have to say.  But I leave it in your hands.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="321">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Well as it pleases you, Chairperson, I won&#039;t take the matter further.  Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="322">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR LAMEY</text>
		</line>
		<line number="323">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Hugo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="324">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR HUGO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairman, just two aspects.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="325">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Lesole, you testified that you&#039;re a trained MK soldier, and I take it that when you referred to a bazooka, can you just give us some explanation of what your understanding is of a bazooka.  Let me rather try and shorten the situation.  There was a dispute about an RPG7 that was taken ostensibly to go and plant it at the scene of the accident, is your understanding that the bazooka and the RP7, that they&#039;re the same thing?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="326">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, they are the same, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="327">
			<speaker>MR HUGO</speaker>
			<text>And your recollection is that there was a bazooka or an RPG7 that was used during this incident.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="328">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>It was the bazooka which was lying on the ground.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="329">
			<speaker>MR HUGO</speaker>
			<text>Ja, but you testified that they started shooting with the bazooka, so your recollection is that they actually used it to shoot during the incident?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="330">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, they used only bazookas during the incident, then they used other kinds of firearms when they entered the structures.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="331">
			<speaker>MR HUGO</speaker>
			<text>And then just one last aspect, which is really more an interesting point.  The death certificate in respect of Mr Rapula, makes mention of the fact that he died due to asphyxiation or suffocation, did you notice any bullet wounds on him afterwards?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="332">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The body was burnt, isn&#039;t it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="333">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>How would I see the bullet wounds whilst he was burnt.  I would not be able to see bullet wounds on the chest, body.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="334">
			<speaker>MR HUGO</speaker>
			<text>Very well, no further questions, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="335">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR HUGO</text>
		</line>
		<line number="336">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Any re-examination ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="337">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Honourable Chairperson ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="338">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Oh I&#039;m sorry, I keep on forgetting you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="339">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s fine.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="340">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	There&#039;s just one curious aspect that I think baffles me in this case, Mr Lesole, do you have any idea how the main house caught alight?  Did you happen to see how that happened?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="341">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>The way these people used the bombs, I think the fire was started by the bombs.  I&#039;m not sure what kind of bombs were used.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="342">
			<speaker>MR HUGO</speaker>
			<text>Ja, absolutely, alright.  Thank you, Honourable Chairperson, I have no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="343">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MS PATEL</text>
		</line>
		<line number="344">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Any further questions, Mr Maribana?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="345">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>No further questions, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="346">
			<speaker>JUDGE KHAMPEPE</speaker>
			<text>I have no questions for Mr Lesole.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="347">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>I have no questions, thank you Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="348">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I just want to know the full names of all the victims please.  You are Funi Steven Lesole.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="349">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="350">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Where can we contact you?  Have you got an address?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="351">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I do have an address.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="352">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Can you give it to me please.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="353">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>Zone 2, T60, Galeshewe, Kimberley.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="354">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Spell it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="355">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>Galeshewe:  G-a-l-e-s-h-e-w-e.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="356">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Any other victims?  Your mother.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="357">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>My mother is staying Mafikeng, in Motlapeng Section.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="358">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Well what&#039;s her full names?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="359">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>Matiko Anna Lesole.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="360">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What&#039;s her address?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="361">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>She&#039;s staying in Motlapeng village.  I don&#039;t have her full address.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="362">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Are you willing to accept a postal address at your address on her behalf?  I understand that we do have her address.  What is it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="363">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Honourable Chairperson, I&#039;ll just check the record, we&#039;ve got full details of all the victims, I can supply it to you later if you so wish.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="364">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  Then you are excused.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="365">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, if I may interrupt, sorry.  There was mentioned by this witness of a girl that was also on the scene, I&#039;d forgotten to ask the name of that girl, because it may be relevant for the portion of our seeking amnesty in respect of the attempted murder charges.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="366">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What is the name of the girl that was there that you referred to?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="367">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>Keitumetse Moroke.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="368">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Spell it please.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="369">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>K-e-i-t-u-m-e-t-s-e, that is Keitumetse - Moroke: M-o-r-o-k-e.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="370">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes thank you, you&#039;re excused.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="371">
			<speaker>MR LESOLE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="372">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
		<line number="373">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Maribana, have you got any more witnesses who may add to what this witness - I&#039;m hoping though that you call nobody that&#039;s just going to repeat what he said.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="374">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, I&#039;ve got one witness, Moshengu.  It is my instructions that he just wants to clear the air, because it was published in the media that died on the day of the incident.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="375">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>He wants to prove that he&#039;s alive.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="376">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="377">
			<speaker>JUDGE KHAMPEPE</speaker>
			<text>And assuage the guilt of the applicants.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="378">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Ja, show the applicants they did such a bad job.  What is his name?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="379">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>Steven Bahumi, and then is nickname, or MK name is Moshengu.  Bahumi: B-a-h-u-m-i.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="380">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Bahumi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="381">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>Bahumi.  That is correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="382">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  Mr Bahumi, what language would you prefer to use?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="383">
			<speaker>MR BAHUMI</speaker>
			<text>English.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="384">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Have you any objection to the taking of the oath?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="385">
			<speaker>STEVEN BAHUMI</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="386">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Please be seated.  What do you want to tell us?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="387">
			<speaker>MR BAHUMI</speaker>
			<text>The only thing which I want to tell the Committee, is that it is true we were - I was part and parcel of that incident, of the raid which took place in 1988.  It is true it was a transit house which we were using.  When we were coming from other countries we were passing through in infiltrating the country, yes.  But the only thing like my attorney said, that I only wanted to clarify the Panel, that they must be knowing that on that day, like the applicants are claiming that I&#039;ve died on that scene, because I&#039;ve heard that on the media.  I only wanted to be informing the Panel that no, I&#039;m still alive, there&#039;s nothing like I have died.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="388">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I think they all understand that now.  Tell me, you were injured that day?  Were you injured?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="389">
			<speaker>MR BAHUMI</speaker>
			<text>Ja, it was braises and those rebels - my ribs were - but I went for an X-Ray in Zimbabwe.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="390">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Was it okay?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="391">
			<speaker>MR BAHUMI</speaker>
			<text>Ja.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="392">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What are you doing now?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="393">
			<speaker>MR BAHUMI</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m in National Intelligence Agency.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="394">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Here in Pretoria?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="395">
			<speaker>MR BAHUMI</speaker>
			<text>No, in Free State Province.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="396">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Is that all you wanted to tell us?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="397">
			<speaker>MR BAHUMI</speaker>
			<text>Ja, I only wanted to clarify that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="398">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I hope everybody accepts that the man is alive now.  Is there any cross-examination?  Are there any questions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="399">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>No questions, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="400">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR NEL</text>
		</line>
		<line number="401">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>No questions, Mr Chairman, except to say that I think there&#039;s still people that think it might be his twin brother.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="402">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Jansen?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="403">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>No questions, thank you Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="404">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chair, no questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="405">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson yes, I wanted to say it&#039;s hard to believe, but I won&#039;t attack his credibility.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="406">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you so much.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="407">
			<speaker>MR BAHUMI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="408">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
		<line number="409">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>It remains then for us to just go through - is that all, Maribana?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="410">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>That is all, Mr Chairman, but I would like to put on record that Kuntakana is available, as well as Manteko.  I just want to place on record that they are present.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="411">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Fair enough.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="412">
			<speaker>JUDGE KHAMPEPE</speaker>
			<text>Who was available?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="413">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>Kuntakana, the herd boy and Manteko ...(indistinct)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="414">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I just want to get a list of the context of what the applicants are.  Mr Hugo, have you got a list of what your client is actually applying for?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="415">
			<speaker>MR HUGO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Chairman, if you could just bear with me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="416">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Well while you&#039;re looking - Mr Lamey, have you got any?  I think you gave us that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="417">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I&#039;ve already covered that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="418">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You also gave it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="419">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Chairman, I covered that in the evidence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="420">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr van der Merwe?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="421">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, I don&#039;t know if I gave it to you in regard to all my clients, may I just run through it for your assistance?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="422">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="423">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE ADDRESSES</speaker>
			<text>As far as the involvement of - let me start at the top:  Johan Hendrik Tait - he just went to the fence, so I would say that his role in this matter would amount to conspiracy to murder ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="424">
			<speaker>JUDGE KHAMPEPE</speaker>
			<text>How many counts?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="425">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>That would be - well they thought there were three people, plus possibly three more.  It&#039;s very difficult to draw a distinction between structure Y and structure X.  I think in the planning stages anything was possible, they didn&#039;t plan to specifically kill the people, but it was foreseen ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="426">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Conspiracy to commit an undetermined number of murders.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="427">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>That is probably the correct way to word it, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="428">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And then two murders?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="429">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>Two murders, two attempted murders, malicious damage to property, as well as arson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="430">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>How does an MITP come in here?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="431">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m throwing it in as part of the net, Mr Chairman.  I will leave it at that, I will stick to arson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="432">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>How many counts of arson would you say there are?  Three as I count them, maybe more, I don&#039;t know.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="433">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>It&#039;s difficult to distinguish because I don&#039;t think it is actually very clear as to how structure X caught alight.  The last witness, or the second-last witness indicated he thought it might have started as a result of the explosion or the explosives ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="434">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Well whatever, the probabilities that it was caused as a result of the attack.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="435">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>The actions of the members of the South African Police.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="436">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Ja.  And as I recall there were three actual independent structures that caught alight, am I wrong?  Three.  The main house, one, the structure behind the main house and the structure in which these two witnesses were housed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="437">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>As I have it, and I maybe I neglected to put it, structure Y, from what I&#039;ve determined, was that there was never a thatched roof on it and there was nothing in it that could burn.  So it was only structure X and the rondawel that could burn.  Those are the only two ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="438">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What about the main house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="439">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s the main house, structure X is the main house.  Y is the facility that housed the fighters.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="440">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The actual transit house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="441">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>Ja.  Well that&#039;s the ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="442">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Was that not burnt?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="443">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>No, that was half demolished by the explosion, but it didn&#039;t burn.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="444">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Well the explosion is arson, isn&#039;t it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="445">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>Well it was the bomb explosion.  I don&#039;t know if I&#039;d go so far as to say arson, but I mean I suppose if it causes a fire, that could be - it could get there.  I will accept that, because I mean the last witness is a person who survived out of that building, so it&#039;s quite clear that that building didn&#039;t burn.  He was taken out of the building.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="446">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Okay.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="447">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>And then the last one would be the illegal possession of firearms, ammunition and/or explosives, whichever the Committee might find.  Plus then also, in this instance, Mr Tait did not cross the border, but he was assisting other people to cross the border illegally.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="448">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	The exact same reasons would be also for Wilhelm Riaan Bellingan, because he was also just at the border post.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="449">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Ja.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="450">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>And then as far as Mr Hoffman is concerned, I think it will also remain the same.  The difference being that he was actually on the scene and was an active member of the execution of this attack.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="451">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But then he would be, in his case, not by assisting others to cross the border, he in fact crossed the border.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="452">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>He in fact crossed.  Thank you, Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="453">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Jansen.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="454">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chair.  Mr Chair ...(indistinct)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="455">
			<speaker>INTERPRETER</speaker>
			<text>The speaker&#039;s mike is not on.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="456">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, Mr Chairman.  I&#039;ll hand it up to you in due course, I just want to read the way I frame how amnesty is sought.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="457">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Well you might as well hand it up without reading it because that&#039;s what I&#039;m asking you to tell me, what your client&#039;s applying for.  ...(indistinct) go by that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="458">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN ADDRESSES</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  It&#039;s for the murder of the two deceased, Mapua and Thika, and I have the full names here, then secondly, the attempted murder of - and initially I had the words</text>
		</line>
		<line number="459" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;all occupants of the dwellings attacked by the applicants on 11 December at Diratapeng, Botswana&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="460">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>but I&#039;ve inserted the names at the moment, so instead of all occupants of the dwellings, one can say the attempted murder of, and list the six people of whom there is evidence before the Committee.  And then thirdly, I&#039;ve just stated in very general terms:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="461" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;All other statutory or common law offences or delicts committed during, and as a result of the planning and execution of the attack.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="462">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>and then just give the details of the attack.  I know as far as these broad - or let me put it this way, the different or the many different offences and delicts that can flow from an incident like that, it would appear that different Committees have different ways of dealing with it.  I leave that in your hands.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="463">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I was also reminded that Mr Ras also did testify to an assault on Mr, it would then have been Kuntakana Molema, in the run-up to the, or in the process of the surveillance of the house at the time that he was arrested by Mr Ras.  I&#039;ll ask for assault then in respect of Mr Kuntakana, during ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="464">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Was that part of his original application?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="465">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>No, but it was part of his evidence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="466">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Well he didn&#039;t make an application for that assault, did he?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="467">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>Well Mr Chairman, I&#039;ll just have to check that, but as far as I remember it wasn&#039;t - that action ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="468">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Well check it, that&#039;s what I&#039;m asking you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="469">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  But Mr Chairman, again the way I have understood the process to have developed, is that if - as long as one can bring one&#039;s offence more-or-less within the ambit of one&#039;s original application, Committees have been willing to grant amnesty for matters which are not strictly speaking within the ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="470">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Look, he didn&#039;t commit this assault on the day of the attack.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="471">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>No, no, it was ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="472">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So it&#039;s a separate incident, so it can&#039;t be fished out of a lake to come within the ambits of the application.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="473">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>No, I accept Mr Chair, that at some or other stage there must be a line ...(indistinct - no microphone)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="474">
			<speaker>JUDGE KHAMPEPE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="475">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Ja, precisely.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="476">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>...(indistinct - no microphone) submit that this would be sufficiently linked to the planning of the incident ...  Sorry Mr Chairman.  My submission would simply be that that assault would be sufficiently linked to the incident as a whole.  If you disagree ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="477">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So be it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="478">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>So be it, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="479">
			<speaker>JUDGE KHAMPEPE</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t think it&#039;s linked, Mr Jansen, I think that you are stretching yourself too far.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="480">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Well let&#039;s leave it like that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="481">
			<speaker>JUDGE KHAMPEPE</speaker>
			<text>If I recall the evidence of Mr Ras, there was an attempt to carry out an operation with members of Special Forces, and this incident would be linked to that incident more than the incident which later transpired, but it wasn&#039;t part of the planning of this operation that Mr Thika was assaulted.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="482">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>Not in a direct sense, but I also submit that it wasn&#039;t in a direct sense linked to that other attack, Chair, I think it was simply linked in a direct way to the process of gaining information on those structures there and ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="483">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You know Mr Jansen, when I used to practice I was told by one of my clients who claimed that he was assaulted, he said - you know he was arrested a couple of times by the Security Police in the area where I used to practice and as a matter of introduction he would get what they call &quot;&#039;n snop klap&quot;, isn&#039;t this what happened?  Just as a matter of introduction, to show who&#039;s boss.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="484">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I accept that it&#039;s almost legend, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="485">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And it had nothing to do with whether this transit house was a transit house and whether it should be destroyed and whatever else happened, not so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="486">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>No certainly it&#039;s a - one falls into that debate of what is necessary and what is not necessary and what can be regarded as political ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="487">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Well I think you summed it up just now, that look, if I disagree with you, so be it, and let&#039;s leave it like that.  You&#039;ve made your submissions, I&#039;ve heard it and you&#039;ve done your duty.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="488">
			<speaker>MR JANSEN</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chair.  If I can then just - I&#039;ll hand this to you just after the ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="489">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Cornelius, have you got submissions on this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="490">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS ADDRESSES</speaker>
			<text>Yes, thank you Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="491">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	It will obviously be as far as the bomb inspector is concerned, or the bomb expert:  conspiracy to murder;  two murders;  ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="492">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Two attempted murders.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="493">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, the attempted murders I would also include all six, because we didn&#039;t know what would happen to the extent of the bomb, it could have killed anybody on the premises.  One arson of the lapa area.  And then I&#039;ve still got a bit of difficulty with malicious damage to property.  If the bomb in fact did cause the fire, then obviously it will be arson of the two other structures as well.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="494">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Well if the bomb would have even scorched the wall, then that&#039;s arson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="495">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, if that is the Committee&#039;s view, I agree with that.  And then obviously:  all contraventions under the Act on Explosives;  all delicts - as you&#039;ve indicated already.  And then the illegal entering and crossing of a border.  Which I think is part and parcel of my whole amnesty application.  Thank you, Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="496">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Hugo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="497">
			<speaker>MR HUGO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="498">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	We agree with the list that Mr Jansen has just handed up, except that - that&#039;s in respect of both Mr de Kock and Mr Radebe, Simon Radebe - I&#039;m not sure whether defeating the ends of justice was contained in that list.  We&#039;re also applying for that. </text>
		</line>
		<line number="499">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Chairman, and then, I suppose it&#039;s not really necessary to itemise it, but the possession of the landmine that was taken across, would also form part and parcel of what we&#039;re seeking amnesty for.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="500">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Well I was thinking of putting that under the explosives ...(indistinct).  Mr Hugo, it didn&#039;t cross my mind about the defeating the ends of justice, but where was that crime, or how was that crime committed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="501">
			<speaker>MR HUGO</speaker>
			<text>Well we would argue, Mr Chairman, that there was a duty on them to disclose ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="502">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>As policemen?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="503">
			<speaker>MR HUGO</speaker>
			<text>As policemen.  ... to disclose that they were involved in an illegal operation etcetera, and that they were crossing ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="504">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did they testify at any hearing or tribunal to that effect?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="505">
			<speaker>MR HUGO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, amongst the issues that came to the fore with the Harms Commission, for instance.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="506">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And they denied it under oath.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="507">
			<speaker>MR HUGO</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="508">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Ja, then that will ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="509">
			<speaker>MR HUGO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Mr Chairman, Mr de Kock has just made me aware of the fact that maybe there was another one, and that&#039;s perjury, in the sense that during the Harms Commission they were explicitly asked whether they partook in these sort-of operations.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="510">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Are you now referring to Mr de Kock and Mr Radebe both?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="511">
			<speaker>MR HUGO</speaker>
			<text>Only Mr de Kock in respect of the perjury incident.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="512">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Yes, but you used the term &quot;we&quot; - or &quot;they&quot; actually.  Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="513">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  Have we come to the stage of argument now?  No more evidence.  Mr Maribana, what&#039;s your attitude towards the applications?  Or let me ask Ms Patel first.  What&#039;s your attitude to the applications?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="514">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Well Honourable Chairperson, in light of the concessions that have been made by the victims, I don&#039;t believe I have any argument in this matter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="515">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Would you agree that this is a case for granting?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="516">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="517">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO ARGUMENT BY MS PATEL</text>
		</line>
		<line number="518">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Maribana, have you got any argument or any reason to submit that it should be refused?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="519">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA IN ARGUMENT</speaker>
			<text>As it pleases the Honourable Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="520">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Chairperson, I&#039;ve got instructions, more in particular from Mr Abraham Thika, the father of Rapula Thika, Mr Chairperson, to oppose amnesty.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="521">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Only on that one, or?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="522">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>Only on that matter, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="523">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Ja, what do you have to say about that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="524">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, on reasons that Rapula Thika, Mr Chairperson, wasn&#039;t involved in politics at all, and it is my humble submission to that, that fact wasn&#039;t put into dispute by the applicants.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="525">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Carry on.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="526">
			<speaker>MR MARIBANA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, I&#039;ve just stated that that fact wasn&#039;t put in dispute by the applicants, that Rapula was involved in politics, Mr Chairperson.  I won&#039;t drag it further, Mr Chairperson, I&#039;ll leave it there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="527">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Yes, we don&#039;t need to hear any other argument from anybody else.  This matter is adjourned.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="528">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	All that is left for me is to thank everybody for showing interest in the process, and to thank especially the logistics people and the interpreters, who often work to exhaustion, and to those people who have provided the food for us to survive.  And those who have travelled far to attend this hearing, I also wish to thank them for the effort made.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="529">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>Excuse me Chairman, there&#039;s something that I neglected on behalf of Mr Hoffman and I just want to shortly address something to the family of Rapula, specifically.  His instruction to me is - unfortunately he had to leave urgently on business - is that despite the fact that he believes that he should qualify for amnesty in this matter, he does apologise to the family of the deceased, Rapula, because of the fact that this was an innocent boy, as was rightly put by the attorney for the family, who was caught up in the crossfire in this incident, and that he wishes to express his sincere regret to the family of this boy.  He cannot unfortunately take it further.   He cannot make this boy come to life again, but he does wish to express his sincere condolences with the family.  Thank you, Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="530">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>With that then we&#039;ll adjourn this hearing.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="531">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>HEARING ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>