<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY HEARINGS</type>
	<startdate>2000-05-09</startdate>
	<location>THOHOYANDOU</location>
	<day>2</day>
	<names>AILWEI MAIVHA</names>
							<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=54169&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/2000/200509th.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="57">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Maivha, what language would you want to speak?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>MR MAIVHA</speaker>
			<text>Venda.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker>AILWEI MAIVHA</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, please be seated.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MR NDOU</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairman.  Mr Maivha, you have brought an application for amnesty and you remember that your co-applicants have already given evidence in your presence in a previous sitting in July last year, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker>MR MAIVHA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it is true.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker>MR NDOU</speaker>
			<text>You have listened to the evidence that they put forth for the Committee, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>MR MAIVHA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it is true.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>MR NDOU</speaker>
			<text>And you have now also submitted your affidavit, do you confirm that what is contained in that affidavit is your evidence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>MR MAIVHA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I agree.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>MR NDOU</speaker>
			<text>Now, if you may just explain to the Committee what role you played on the day in question when the deceased was killed, what did you personally do when the deceased was killed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>MR MAIVHA</speaker>
			<text>I hope, I think on that day on which the deceased was killed, a meeting was held and I was present and all decisions which was taken, I was there.  When we arrived to the issue of telling the deceased to leave the place, I was also there with the reasons to that respect because we were against the things which were done in that country.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	As youth we were against what was happening in the country.  The day in which we killed the deceased, we were simply telling him to leave the country.  On arriving at the gate next to the deceased&#039;s home, what the deceased started to do is to throw stones at us with his children. </text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, now you heard the evidence of the other applicants in respect of this offence.  Correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker>MR MAIVHA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is true.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What did you do yourself there, did you attend the meeting?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>MR MAIVHA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I attended the meeting.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And you went with the whole group to this person&#039;s house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>MR MAIVHA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What did you do?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>MR MAIVHA</speaker>
			<text>I, when the deceased started throwing stones, I also threw stones at him.  As we were fighting with him, I also took out petrol from his car, then burnt a car which was there in the yard.  That is what I did on my arrival there at the home of the deceased.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You threw stones at him or at his house or what?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>MR MAIVHA</speaker>
			<text>The stones were hitting the house and not the deceased.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You say in your statement that you threw stones at the deceased while he was being attacked - paragraph 46(2)?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>MR MAIVHA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, we threw them to the deceased, but unfortunately they were missing the deceased, obviously I was directing the stones to the deceased.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Oh, I see, all right.  So you hit the house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker>MR MAIVHA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>When you missed the deceased?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>MR MAIVHA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it is true.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker>MR NDOU</speaker>
			<text>That is all Honourable Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR NDOU</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr van Rensburg, have you got any questions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR VAN RENSBURG</speaker>
			<text>Yes, just one or two, thank you Mr Chairperson.   When you went to the deceased&#039;s house on that fateful day, was it the main purpose to go and kill him or to chase him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>MR MAIVHA</speaker>
			<text>The main aim was to request him to leave the village.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker>MR VAN RENSBURG</speaker>
			<text>Okay, now explain to me what political aim would there be in chasing him from the community?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker>MR MAIVHA</speaker>
			<text>During that day when we decided to chase him, it is that the deceased was against the youth which was formed there at Mavhunga.  What he did to the youth is that he was totally against the Youth Congress and the other decision is that we were suspecting him of participating in witchcraft.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	That is why we ended up taking a decision of saying that he must be evicted, without the aim of killing him.  The decision of killing him just came about when we were, when the deceased started to fight us.  As we were fighting, then we ended up killing him, but the reason was not of killing him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>MR VAN RENSBURG</speaker>
			<text>Now, then on behalf of the victims, I just have to put it to you and that is my instructions that the deceased was killed not because of any political reason, because some people in the community were jealous of his ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Achievements?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker>MR VAN RENSBURG</speaker>
			<text>I think that is a good description, thank you Mr Chairman, of his achievements?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker>MR MAIVHA</speaker>
			<text>With Edward Mavhunga, but then I knew him very well, I think there was no jealousy that we can - we can be jealous from him.  It is only that he was opposing us, the youth, that is why we took that decision and simply because he was suspected of witchcraft.  I don&#039;t think there is a worse person who can simply be jealous of a person for his achievement.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	The main issue was that he was suspected of practising witchcraft and fighting with the youth.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker>MR VAN RENSBURG</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairperson, I&#039;ve got no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR VAN RENSBURG</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>I have no questions Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR MAPOMA</text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Ndou?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker>MR NDOU</speaker>
			<text>None, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO RE-EXAMINATION BY MR NDOU</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, you are excused.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker>MR NDOU</speaker>
			<text>That is all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mapoma, it is half past three.  I think we can slip in at least another one.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson, we will be dealing now with incident 14.  I realise there are three applicants involved in that incident.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>...(indistinct)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>The main reason Chairperson, why I call this matter is that there is a victim who is reportedly sickly, then it would be in her interest that at least we hear from as many applicants as possible today.  Thank you Chair.  The applicants in this matter are Tshinyadzo Daneil Mauba, Victor Mnuleni Mukheli and Freddy Davhula.  Mr van Rensburg is appearing on behalf of the victims and Mr Ndou for the applicants.  Thank you Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker>MR NDOU</speaker>
			<text>I call Patwani Freddy Davhula.</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>