<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY HEARINGS</type>
	<startdate>2000-05-10</startdate>
	<location>THOHOYANDOU</location>
	<day>3</day>
	<names>MALUTA SIMON MATSHISEVHE</names>
	<case>AM720697</case>
						<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=54180&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/2000/200510th.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="104">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker>MR NDOU</speaker>
			<text>I now call Mr Matshisevhe.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Matshisevhe, what language would you wish to use?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker>MR MATSHISEVHE</speaker>
			<text>Venda.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>MALUTA SIMON MATSHISEVHE</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MR NDOU</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Matshisevhe, you are applying for amnesty.  When were you born?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker>MR MATSHISEVHE</speaker>
			<text>I was born on the 24th September 1968.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>MR NDOU</speaker>
			<text>Yes, you filed an affidavit with the Committee.  Have you read the affidavit?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>MR MATSHISEVHE</speaker>
			<text>Yes I know it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>MR NDOU</speaker>
			<text>And do you confirm that that is your evidence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>MR MATSHISEVHE</speaker>
			<text>Yes I confirm.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>MR NDOU</speaker>
			<text>Now could you explain to the Committee, we&#039;ve already heard from the previous applicants that the deceased was attacked on a particular day.  Now what role did you play on that particular day?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker>MR MATSHISEVHE</speaker>
			<text>I will start my evidence from the meeting when these things started from the dam.  When we left the dam the decision was already taken that we are going to the home of the deceased to tell him to leave the village.  On our arrival we met the deceased with two men, two other men.  It&#039;s then that the deceased went back to the yard and then he came back holding two bush knives and seemed to be intending to fight us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Ndou, is this applicant another one of the deceased&#039;s grandnephews?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker>MR MATSHISEVHE</speaker>
			<text>I can&#039;t remember, but they&#039;re fairly closely related altogether.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Because 24 it says that ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>MR NDOU</speaker>
			<text>Paragraph?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>24, page 33(d), that the deceased was his grandfather&#039;s younger brother?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>MR NDOU</speaker>
			<text>I think page 24 relates to the previous applicant.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m talking about 33(d)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>MR NDOU</speaker>
			<text>33(d)?  What paragraph was that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>24.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>MR NDOU</speaker>
			<text>I think there&#039;s a problem with the number.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker>JUDGE DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>(d), not (b).</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>MR NDOU</speaker>
			<text>It seems like we&#039;ve got a similar problem.  Yes, unfortunately I got him to look at the affidavit and he pointed back and said well there&#039;s not problem with it, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker>JUDGE DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Carry on.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker>MR NDOU</speaker>
			<text>Let me just try to establish from him.  Are you i any way connected to the deceased?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker>MR MATSHISEVHE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>MR NDOU</speaker>
			<text>What is the deceased to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker>MR MATSHISEVHE</speaker>
			<text>It&#039;s my uncle.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker>MR NDOU</speaker>
			<text>Okay, in fact it appears that that paragraph 24 belongs to the previous applicant&#039;s affidavit so may we apply that that be expunged from the affidavit?  Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Okay, now I&#039;ve asked you as to what role you played on the day in question in the killing of the deceased?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>MR MATSHISEVHE</speaker>
			<text>On arriving at the deceased&#039;s home, seeing that he was about to fight us, then we threw stones at the deceased and then the deceased went back and then I saw him standing behind the house.  It&#039;s then that we started to assault him and then he jumped the fence and then he went to the home of his younger brother and then we were storming him and I was so close, I was also pelting him with stones and then we went to another yard.  On our arrival to the third yard and then I assaulted the deceased with a stone at the back and then he fell down.  It&#039;s then that this Buti poured petrol on the deceased and then he was lighted by this Buti.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>MR NDOU</speaker>
			<text>I see.  On page 19 of your application, paragraph 9(a), you indicate that, this is what you say</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I was there.  I did nothing.  It is said that I threw stones.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>What did you mean by that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker>MR MATSHISEVHE</speaker>
			<text>Of the stones I was throwing of course there was one stone which hit him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>MR NDOU</speaker>
			<text>No, but in your paragraph 9(a) you say you did nothing but it is said that &quot;I threw stones&quot;, did you throw stones or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker>MR MATSHISEVHE</speaker>
			<text>I threw stones.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Why did you say you didn&#039;t?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker>MR MATSHISEVHE</speaker>
			<text>I think that is a mistake.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>How can it be a mistake?  What kind of a mistake is it?  You clearly say you did not do anything but it is said you threw stones?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker>MR MATSHISEVHE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, the truth is that I did throw stones.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I know, we&#039;re not talking about the truth now, we&#039;re talking about what&#039;s contained in your application?  Have you got any explanation?  Isn&#039;t it true ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker>MR MATSHISEVHE</speaker>
			<text>In my affidavit I wrote that I threw stones.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You&#039;re avoiding the question.  Answer the question.  I&#039;m not stupid, I can read what you said in your affidavit.  I&#039;m asking what you meant as your advocate has asked what you meant in your application, you said you did nothing but it&#039;s said that you threw stones?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker>MR MATSHISEVHE</speaker>
			<text>No, I&#039;m unable to understand this but what I wrote is this that I did throw stones.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You are unable to understand what I&#039;m asking you, is that what you&#039;re saying?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker>MR MATSHISEVHE</speaker>
			<text>Yes I may be unable to understand that, I won&#039;t deny that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Look at your application, paragraph 9(a).  Can you read it?  It says</text>
		</line>
		<line number="51" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I was there, I did nothing.  It is said that I threw stones.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Now that is there, it can&#039;t be misunderstood.  Now I&#039;m asking why did you say that in your application?  Which part of that question don&#039;t you understand?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker>JUDGE DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Perhaps to make it easier, why did you lie in your application?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker>MR MATSHISEVHE</speaker>
			<text>What I wrote in my affidavit, so now I&#039;m unable to understand that but I think that I wrote that I threw stones, that was part of what I included in my application.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mapoma, have you got his original application with you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>No I do not have, Chairperson, but yes I can just say I don&#039;t have it.  We&#039;ll have to find out from Cape Town office.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did you fill in the application yourself?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker>MR MATSHISEVHE</speaker>
			<text>Yes we did write this thing and hand it to our legal advisor.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What language did you use when you filled it in?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker>MR MATSHISEVHE</speaker>
			<text>I used Venda.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="61">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And can you remember what you said, what you wrote there when you filled it in, that paragraph, when you were asked for what acts are you applying?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="62">
			<speaker>MR MATSHISEVHE</speaker>
			<text>I think I wrote relating the whole story what happened there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="63">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Carry on Mr Ndou.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="64">
			<speaker>MR NDOU</speaker>
			<text>Apart from throwing stones did you do anything else at the scene?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="65">
			<speaker>MR MATSHISEVHE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, after - in fact no, after throwing stones there&#039;s nothing which I did after that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="66">
			<speaker>MR NDOU</speaker>
			<text>That is all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="67">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR NDOU</text>
		</line>
		<line number="68">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR MUSHASHA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="69">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Do you know the woman sitting next to me on my right?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="70">
			<speaker>MR MATSHISEVHE</speaker>
			<text>Yes I know her.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="71">
			<speaker>MR MUSHASHA</speaker>
			<text>She says she saw you throwing stones during this incident.  She also saw you participating in the burning of the house.  What do you say?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="72">
			<speaker>MR MATSHISEVHE</speaker>
			<text>I disagree with that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="73">
			<speaker>MR MUSHASHA</speaker>
			<text>Who is Buti?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="74">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Before you carry on, what does she mean by participating in the burning of the house?  Any specific act that he committed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="75">
			<speaker>MR MUSHASHA</speaker>
			<text>Can I establish precisely what she means?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="76">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Because it may be by common purpose.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="77">
			<speaker>MR MUSHASHA</speaker>
			<text>She will say that when she says you participated in the burning of the house you were the one who was collecting the clothes altogether and Chikudo set them alight.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="78">
			<speaker>JUDGE DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, before answering could we have that clear?  He collected the clothes.  Was the clothes used to set alight the house or what, was the clothes a separate item being burnt separately and the house lit by somebody separately?  Could we have clarify about that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="79">
			<speaker>MR MUSHASHA</speaker>
			<text>As it pleases the Chairperson.   I&#039;ll again try and get clarity on that.  May I Mr Chairperson?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="80">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>...(inaudible)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="81">
			<speaker>MR MUSHASHA</speaker>
			<text>Indeed so Mr Chairperson, but ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="82">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Proceed, we&#039;re not going to argue.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="83">
			<speaker>MR MUSHASHA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, it&#039;s not easy, not easy to get clarity on this point but what I gather from the ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="84">
			<speaker>JUDGE DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Okay put what you ...(inaudible) to the witness.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="85">
			<speaker>MR MUSHASHA</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s right.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="86">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	She saw you putting together the clothes after which Chikudo set him alight and because you entered the house of the deceased after she saw it ablaze, she presumed that you participated in the burning of the house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="87">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Well there you have the answer, he says he didn&#039;t?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="88">
			<speaker>MR MUSHASHA</speaker>
			<text>I wanted just to complete that question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="89">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Now this Buti, is Buti one and the same person as Tambani?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="90">
			<speaker>MR MATSHISEVHE</speaker>
			<text>Yes it is.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="91">
			<speaker>MR MUSHASHA</speaker>
			<text>Why did you decide to kill the deceased?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="92">
			<speaker>MR MATSHISEVHE</speaker>
			<text>It is because the deceased was associated with the witchcraft activities.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="93">
			<speaker>MR MUSHASHA</speaker>
			<text>And if the deceased was a wizard, how would that be connected with the political climate of the day?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="94">
			<speaker>MR MATSHISEVHE</speaker>
			<text>Well there is connection because the deceased was a member of the council, the tribal council in the local area and as such, as far as we were concerned we deemed it fit to link the two things, political issues and the tribal council issues.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="95">
			<speaker>MR MUSHASHA</speaker>
			<text>My instructions are that you did not kill the deceased for purposes of any political gain but now you did so out of sheer jealousy and maybe to settle old scores with him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="96">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Is that true?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="97">
			<speaker>MR MATSHISEVHE</speaker>
			<text>No, surely that is not true.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="98">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Any more questions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="99">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>No further questions Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="100">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mapoma?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="101">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;ve no questions Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="102">
			<speaker>MR NDOU</speaker>
			<text>Nothing further Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="103">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, you&#039;re excused.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="104">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>