<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY HEARINGS</type>
	<startdate>2000-05-23</startdate>
	<location>JOHANNESBURG</location>
	<day>2</day>
	<names>STRANGER JABULANI MBHALATI</names>
	<case>AM5739/97</case>
	<matter>ATTACK ON RITA TOWNSHIP AND MURDER OF MR SINGANGE</matter>
					<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=54221&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/2000/200523jh.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="238">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker>STRANGER JABULANI MBHALATI</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mbhalati, is it correct that you are a co-applicant in this matter?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>MR MBHALATI</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>There are matters, be specific.   We heard from Mr Ngobeni three incidents and now you say in this matter, is he applying for one?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>I do not know Chairperson if it is appropriate for me at this stage to argue that the incidents are argued in one matter, but I believe that that is perhaps an academic question and I will rephrase, but I would submit that this is one matter that comprises of a number of incidents.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Mbhalati, is it correct that you are a co-applicant in the incidents that are before this Honourable Committee at this moment?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>MR MBHALATI</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Now I am showing a document to you, Chairperson page fifteen of the bundle of documents.  Is that your application form?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>MR MBHALATI</speaker>
			<text>It&#039;s my application.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Now on page twenty of the same bundle of documents, there is a signature at the bottom, is that your signature?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>MR MBHALATI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it&#039;s mine.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Now would you proceed to read your statement to the Committee, which shall be your evidence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR MBHALATI</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I joined the ANC in 1990 at Nkuakua and I became a member of an underground MK unit which was commanded by John Ngobeni.  I received military training from my Commander inside the country.  I confirm that I belonged to one of these units and was involved in the planning and the attack on Shingange which occurred on the 15th during 1990 and the one on the South African Defence Force personnel at Rita which occurred on the 16th June 1990.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Now you&#039;ve heard the evidence of Mr Ngobeni and where he mentions you as having been present.  Do you confirm that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>MR MBHALATI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I confirm.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Now looking at your evidence that you&#039;ve just given, Mr Ngobeni&#039;s evidence, do you say that you have complied with the requirement of full disclosure of the relevant facts and that you would have told everything that you know about these incidents?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>MR MBHALATI</speaker>
			<text>I would say yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Did you receive any personal gain for having involved yourself in these incidents?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>MR MBHALATI</speaker>
			<text>Not at all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Without really explaining, I would need a short answer.  Do you say that these actions had a political motive?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>MR MBHALATI</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Chairperson, that is the evidence from Mr Mbhalati.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR KOOPEDI</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Koopedi.  Ms Vilakazi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>I have a few questions Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mbhalati, in your evidence you have said that you were involved in the planning of the attack on Shingange.  Can you give full details of your involvement in the whole Shingange affair?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The question is too wide.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>Perhaps I could divide it into two questions.  My first question would be, were you involved in the planning as well as the execution of the plan or were you involved in the planning only?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker>MR MBHALATI</speaker>
			<text>I would say I was involved in both.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>Were you present when Mr Shingange was killed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>MR MBHALATI</speaker>
			<text>I was present.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>And what was your role in that regard?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker>MR MBHALATI</speaker>
			<text>I accompanied Sililo.  At that time I happened to confirm to Sililo that Shingange was the person whom we were looking after and one other thing is that I also carried the bag which contained an AK47 which Sililo used to fire at Shingange.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>When Sililo shot at - do you confirm that it is Sililo who shot at Shingange?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker>MR MBHALATI</speaker>
			<text>I confirm.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>And where were you at that particular time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker>MR MBHALATI</speaker>
			<text>I was somewhere next to the point whereby the vehicle which was driven by Shingange left.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>Does that mean that you were not on the same spot with Sililo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker>MR MBHALATI</speaker>
			<text>I was at the same spot with Sililo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>Did you see that there were some other persons in the vehicle, besides Shingange?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker>MR MBHALATI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I&#039;ve seen that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>Did you know Shingange personally?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker>MR MBHALATI</speaker>
			<text>I knew him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>And were you able to identify him in the vehicle?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker>MR MBHALATI</speaker>
			<text>I was able to.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>And regarding the planning, what was the plan?  How were you going to execute the  - how was Shingange to be killed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker>MR MBHALATI</speaker>
			<text>In as far as I remember, it has never been mentioned how and when.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>But then it happened that you went to a place where Shingange was.  Was it just a coincidence that you happened to be at that place and Shingange was there, or was it part of your plan?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker>MR MBHALATI</speaker>
			<text>It was part of the plan.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>So it means you planned to execute him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker>MR MBHALATI</speaker>
			<text>Definitely.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>And you knew that he was going to be there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker>MR MBHALATI</speaker>
			<text>We knew.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>And how did you intend killing him, knowing that he was going to be there at the place where there were going to be other people?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker>MR MBHALATI</speaker>
			<text>I cannot exactly explain or answer that question, but I can only explain how it did actually take place.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>Are you - I just want to understand you clearly, are you saying that you just wanted to kill Shingange and you did not plan as to how he is going to be killed.  Is that what you are saying?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker>MR MBHALATI</speaker>
			<text>Not necessarily that.  Finally my understanding was that for in case we happen to be in contact with Shingange an execution should take place of the mission.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>And what about the fact that there was a possibility of other people being there?  Was that particular fact addressed in part of your planning?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="61">
			<speaker>MR MBHALATI</speaker>
			<text>It was actually addressed that the only target was only Shingange, not any other person by that time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="62">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>So what were you planning to do if Shingange was not alone?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="63">
			<speaker>MR MBHALATI</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t exactly know what would actually happen, because by that time I wasn&#039;t the person who was supposed to pull the trigger.  Maybe if the person who was supposed to pull the trigger should be in a better position to answer that question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="64">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>Going to the incident at Rita, what was your involvement in that?  How were you involved in the Rita incident, the attack of the SADF in Rita?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="65">
			<speaker>MR MBHALATI</speaker>
			<text>Basically as my co-applicant had explained that the attack was not necessarily aimed at the SADF, it was aimed at eliminating George Rasebotse, so we happened to use one Chris who was basically in the know of the vehicle and the moment in which Rasebotse is frequenting the place where we were positioned in order to eliminate him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="66">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>How many were you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="67">
			<speaker>MR MBHALATI</speaker>
			<text>Four.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="68">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>Who else was there?  Sililo, Ngobeni and the other Sililo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="69">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>And the other one was obviously the first applicant?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="70">
			<speaker>MR MBHALATI</speaker>
			<text>It was myself, Ngobeni, Sililo and the other Sililo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="71">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  I have no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="72">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MS VILAKAZI</text>
		</line>
		<line number="73">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Ms Vilakazi.  Ms Coleridge.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="74">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson, just one question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="75">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>You said you joined the ANC in 1990, which month in 1990 did you join the ANC?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="76">
			<speaker>MR MBHALATI</speaker>
			<text>I can&#039;t recall which month.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="77">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>Was it before this incident or after these incidents?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="78">
			<speaker>MR MBHALATI</speaker>
			<text>Before.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="79">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>Then just on that same page Chairperson, I just want to rectify.  On the second line from the bottom it states the 16th of June, but the Shingange matter happened on the 15th, just to change that.  Thank you Chairperson, I have no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="80">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MS COLERIDGE</text>
		</line>
		<line number="81">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Obviously no re-examination.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="82">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Nothing in re-exam thanks Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="83">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO RE-EXAMINATION BY MR KOOPEDI</text>
		</line>
		<line number="84">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Adv Sigodi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="85">
			<speaker>ADV SIGODI</speaker>
			<text>...(indistinct)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="86">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Adv Bosman?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="87">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Just one question.  I don&#039;t know whether I&#039;ve missed something somewhere.  Were you ever arrested and convicted of your participation in these two incidents?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="88">
			<speaker>MR MBHALATI</speaker>
			<text>I was once arrested, released on bail.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="89">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>And was this in connection with these incidents?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="90">
			<speaker>MR MBHALATI</speaker>
			<text>Correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="91">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>And now you&#039;re also applying for amnesty in regard to the - no, did you comply with your bail conditions, or did you skip the bail?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="92">
			<speaker>MR MBHALATI</speaker>
			<text>I complied.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="93">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Oh you complied.  Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="94">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Adv Bosman.  Now in respect of this, your arrest, were you advised about the charges prepared against you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="95">
			<speaker>MR MBHALATI</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, I don&#039;t get your question correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="96">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did they tell you what you are going to be charged with?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="97">
			<speaker>MR MBHALATI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, they explained.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="98">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What were you going to be charged with?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="99">
			<speaker>MR MBHALATI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, they explained.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="100">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What were you going to be charged with?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="101">
			<speaker>MR MBHALATI</speaker>
			<text>If I remember well, one was the charge of murder, possession of firearm and ammunition.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="102">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Now what happened to the trial because you just said to my colleague here you were released on bail.  What happened to the trial?  Was it not proceeded with?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="103">
			<speaker>MR MBHALATI</speaker>
			<text>The trial didn&#039;t take off since the condition of us being given bail, it was during the process of the negotiations between the ANC and the Government by then and there were arrangements whereby the trial couldn&#039;t be carried out.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="104">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>To date?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="105">
			<speaker>MR MBHALATI</speaker>
			<text>Ja.  I mean since I was out on bail, it was later - they later informed us that the trial can no longer be carried out.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="106">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Were reasons furnished why it couldn&#039;t be carried out?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="107">
			<speaker>MR MBHALATI</speaker>
			<text>At one stage, if I remember well, there was a letter which I received from the Department of Justice, which was something to do with indemnifying myself in all the charges.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="108">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Mbhalati.  Again Mr Koopedi, nothing arises?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="109">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Nothing arises Chairperson and that will be the application.  We close this application.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="110">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO RE-EXAMINATION BY MR KOOPEDI</text>
		</line>
		<line number="111">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
		<line number="112">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Ms Vilakazi, are you calling any witnesses?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="113">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;ll be calling two witnesses, the widow of the late Shingange and Lily Nthembo Shingange.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="114">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You may proceed to do so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="115">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>My first witness will be Nyembezi Florence Shingange.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="116">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>May I ask a question and I believe this is purely for my own clarification and perhaps one should start by saying this is not asked because of insensitivity.  I gathered at the beginning of this hearing that the application is not opposed and I am trying to understand and like I said in my mind, why is there any other evidence led, which is not led by the applicant?  I do not know if I am at liberty to ask this question, Chairperson and I will put myself in your hands because the statement I have seen, looks and sounds to me like it belongs to the HRV Committee.  Thank you Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="117">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>At the beginning she said she was going to call witnesses to express their feelings, hence they are not sworn in, they are merely expressing their feelings.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="118">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson, I now understand.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="119">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You may proceed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="120">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>Honourable Chairperson I&#039;m in possession of an affidavit that was filed by, that was prepared by the witness Nyembezi Florence Shingange.  I just wanted to establish if the copies have been served on the ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="121">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;ve just become aware of a document given to me headed Affidavit.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="122">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>May I indicate that the evidence which is to be given by the two witnesses is put in to be part of the record for the witnesses to be considered for purposes of reparation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="123">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Wouldn&#039;t the affidavit in that instance suffice for those purposes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="124">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I was about to say to the Panel that the affidavit will be submitted as evidence and if a need arises for, if the Panel is of the opinion that there are aspects that need to be clarified, then the witness will be available for clarification purposes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="125">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I think this affidavit is drafted in such a manner that no questions arise out of it.  Marked as Exhibit what?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="126">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>D, Chairperson, D.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="127">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>To me, speaking for myself, a quick reading gives me all what happened to her husband and what subsequently obtained in the community in respect of her, by being ostracised, that she wants to further her studies, that the reparations should consider such an instance and as well as the children who are now looked after by her and the pension that emanates from the State, barely meets her needs.  I think that comes out very clear.  I don&#039;t know if there is any other thing you want to clarify.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="128">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>Beyond the affidavit there would be no further clarification, so the affidavit will then constitute the submission on the part of the witness.  Thank you Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="129">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>It would form part of our evidence in the documents as it has already been marked D.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="130">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>The other witness is Lily Mthembo Shingange.  For the record, let me indicate that the witness is a sister to the deceased and she was with the deceased in the vehicle that was ambushed.  There is a sworn statement which the witness has made to the press on page forty of the bundle, page forty to forty-one of the bundle.  Now the affidavit as it stands, relates the incident itself, as to how the attack occurred.  The nature of the injuries that were sustained by the witness are not elaborated on in the affidavit and the effects, the emotional effects and other effects that the incident had on the witness, were also  - are not also covered in the affidavit.  I would submit that the affidavit which is contained on pages 40 to 41, be taken as part of the evidence and that the witness be led only with regard to the effect of the incident on herself and on her family.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="131">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Ja, everything in this bundle forms part of evidence, that&#039;s why we went through that statement when we were furnished with the bundle, but you may however just clarify certain aspects like for instance the injuries you have just spoken about.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="132">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>Honourable Chairperson seeing that the evidence relating to the injuries is not part of the affidavit, just a procedural questions, should that not be under oath?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="133">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>It&#039;s just amplification of this affidavit, Madam.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="134">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="135">
			<speaker>LILY NTHEMBO SHINGANGE</speaker>
			<text>(states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="136">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>Can you just confirm Ma&#039;am that you are Lily NthembO Shingange?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="137">
			<speaker>MS SHINGANGE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that&#039;s true.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="138">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>And that the papers that I am showing to you are the statements that you made.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="139">
			<speaker>MS SHINGANGE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="140">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>Now can you just tell to me, the Panel is already aware of what happened on that particular day.  Can you just explain to the Panel what injuries did you sustain in that attack?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="141">
			<speaker>MS SHINGANGE</speaker>
			<text>It was on the 16th of June in 1990.  My brother came to my place and requested me to accompany him to the Memorial Service.  We went there.  When we arrived at my sister&#039;s place where our cousin passed away...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="142">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>Can I just lead the witness?  The hearing has already been informed of what actually happened.  Can you just take us from when after the car was attacked?  What happened to you and the effect on your life afterwards.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="143">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>We want to know what happened to your body.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="144">
			<speaker>INTERPRETER</speaker>
			<text>The mike is not on.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="145">
			<speaker>MS SHINGANGE</speaker>
			<text>When we went to the car after walking some few metres and then we heard some shots.  I was in the middle.  Between myself and my brother there were two bullets which passed.  He was struck by the third bullet.  I was shot in the thigh.  After that shot the car went off the road and inside another yard.  Two your boys came to that car.  They dragged me out of the car.  They took me to the funeral.  I was crying by then, I was calling my mother to come and see us before I die.  After that I don&#039;t know what happened, I can&#039;t remember.  When I woke up I was in hospital.  What happened after the shooting I can&#039;t remember, but what was difficult for me is that when I went to the toilet it was difficult for me, when I wanted to pass out it was difficult.  They discharged me on the 29th.  They gave me crutches.  I used them for six months.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="146">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>So can you just explain the nature of the injuries you sustained?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="147">
			<speaker>MS SHINGANGE</speaker>
			<text>I was shot on the hip.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="148">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>Was that the only injury?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="149">
			<speaker>MS SHINGANGE</speaker>
			<text>And even my leg.  Even now I can feel the pain.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="150">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>Was your leg affected by the incident, by the injuries?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="151">
			<speaker>MS SHINGANGE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="152">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>Can you still walk on that knee?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="153">
			<speaker>MS SHINGANGE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, sometimes it is difficult for me to walk.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="154">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>So you have not recovered fully from those injuries?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="155">
			<speaker>MS SHINGANGE</speaker>
			<text>Even now, I can&#039;t sit for a very long time, I have to shift position so that it doesn&#039;t affect my leg because it was an open wound.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="156">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>At the time of the incident, were you employed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="157">
			<speaker>MS SHINGANGE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I was working for myself.  I was working, I was selling something so that I can maintain myself.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="158">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>Are you still able to go on selling?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="159">
			<speaker>MS SHINGANGE</speaker>
			<text>No, I&#039;m no longer selling.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="160">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>Do you have children?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="161">
			<speaker>MS SHINGANGE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I&#039;ve got two children.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="162">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>Are those children at school?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="163">
			<speaker>MS SHINGANGE</speaker>
			<text>No, they are not at school because I can&#039;t work for myself.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="164">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>Can you say that if it was not for the injuries that you have sustained, you would be able to feed yourself and your children?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="165">
			<speaker>MS SHINGANGE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, myself, if I&#039;m well I can work for myself.  Even those people who accompanied me, they knew that I work for myself if I was able to.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="166">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>That will be all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="167">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MS VILAKAZI</text>
		</line>
		<line number="168">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Ms Vilakazi.  Obviously Mr Koopedi, you don&#039;t have questions to ask.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="169">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>You&#039;re correct, Chairperson, no questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="170">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR KOOPEDI</text>
		</line>
		<line number="171">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And would I assume the same with my Panel?  Ms Coleridge?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="172">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>No questions thank you Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="173">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MS COLERIDGE</text>
		</line>
		<line number="174">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you very much Ms Lily Nthembo Shingange for the input you have given this Committee.  In arriving at a decision we shall take what you said into account.  Thank you, you are excused.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="175">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
		<line number="176">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>May I throw the ball in your court for submissions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="177">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson.  I have a very brief submission.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="178">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Before you do so, do you know the indemnity which Mr Mbhalati spoke of, what it covered?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="179">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson and in fact our attempt to see on what basis was he given amnesty, we were unsuccessful.  We also tried to establish whether Mr Ngobeni was granted amnesty, but we could not get that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="180">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>We grant amnesty.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="181">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Indemnity.  I&#039;m referring to indemnity, sorry, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="182">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You may proceed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="183">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI IN ARGUMENT</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Perhaps Honourable Committee Members I will start at submitting that this application revolves around incidents that occurred very late in the struggle of apartheid, if you look at the dates.  My submission is that even though these operations were carried out after the release of President Mandela and other prominent political leaders, their release had nothing to do with the conduct of the armed combatants that were in the country.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="184">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	It is my submission that attacks similar to these facilitated what used to be known as the Codesa negotiations.  It is such </text>
		</line>
		<line number="185">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>actions that enabled political opponents to come together and to agree on a cessation of hostilities and I therefore submit that when these occurred, this was during the time of the struggle against apartheid and again, Mr Chairman, Honourable Committee Members, it is my submission that the three applicants before you have complied with the requirements for the granting of amnesty.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="186">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	My submission is that on the evidence that has been tendered, the applicants have fully disclosed all the relevant facts in this matter.  They all did not receive any personal gain and on that aspect finally, it&#039;s my submission that all the people who were attacked and all the property which perhaps was damaged, this stemmed from a politically motivated action with resultant political objective.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="187">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	It is on that basis that I will ask that the three applicants be granted amnesty.  Perhaps one should also try and state on what incidents or actions that we request amnesty.  The first one will be the attack on the SADF Personnel at Nkuakua stadium on the 12th of April 1990 and this will also go hand in hand with possession or the illegal possession of arms, the arms being two AK 47 rifles and twelve hand grenades, which grenades were described as F1&#039;s and RGD5&#039;s and the people asking for amnesty on this instance, will be the first and the second applicant being Mr Ngobeni and Mr Muhlava. </text>
		</line>
		<line number="188">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Koopedi, with the attack on the SADF personnel be attempted murders of these personnel, or would it be assault, or how would you suggest that we formulate it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="189">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>I would leave it as an attack, but also add that any incidents that might flow from that because we do not know if people died, we do not know if property was damaged and if so, to what extent, so I would wish to leave it as an attack on them, but add a sentence that would say any delictual crime that stems from that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="190">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>...(inaudible - no microphone)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="191">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s right.  That&#039;s right.  And the second incident for which amnesty is being asked for, and this involves the first applicant Mr Ngobeni and the last applicant Mr Mbhalati, which is the attack and killing of Constable Shingange.  This happened on the 15th of June 1990 and added to that, there was an illegal possession of two AK47 rifles and an unknown number of hand grenades.  The applicants could not recall how many hand grenades they had here.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="192">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	This attack and killing on Const Shingange also goes to cover the injuries that were occasioned on his sister, who has also just given testimony before you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="193">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>...(indistinct - no microphone)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="194">
			<speaker>INTERPRETER</speaker>
			<text>Mike on please.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="195">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Sorry.  The intention was to kill Const Shingange, so that was a murder and then it would either be an attempted murder or an assault on ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="196">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>I would not - I find great difficulty firstly in defining it as an attempted murder, simply because of the intention of the applicant as and when they did this.  They had no intention to injure or to want to kill any other person who was with.  My other grey area is also that one does not know if anyone else was injured, whether by a bullet or shrapnel and I would, in this instance, try and perhaps persuade you to accept that we&#039;re asking for amnesty for the attack and killing of Const Shingange, including the illegal possession of the weapons, but also to say any other crime or delict that would have flown from that attack.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="197">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>The difficulty I have, Mr Koopedi, is that we have evidence now under oath from Lily Shingange that she was seriously injured in this attack and the Reparations Committee will have to deal with that and for us just to put that under one umbrella may create some difficulty, but perhaps that is a matter which the Committee can it&#039;s mind to.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="198">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>No, in that respect, you heard me ask one of the applicants and specifically about Lily Nthembo, that was this not foreseeable, he said yes, but we were targeting Shingange.  When I said using a heavy calibre like an AK47, that the bullet could injure somebody else and whilst, when somebody has been fired at, it cannot be termed GBH, it must be attempted murder.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="199">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>That may indeed be so, Chairperson and perhaps I would rephrase and ask that the word attempted murder on Mr Shingange&#039;s sister, those words should be added to what I&#039;m presently submitting.  I however wish to add that there may have been people who were injured, whom we don&#039;t know of at this stage.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="200">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And that would cover anything flowing from that, but the two we should mention.  For instance Murder, killing of Shingange, attempted murder, unlawful possession of firearms, unlawful possession of an unknown quantity of hand grenades.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="201">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Some property was damaged, also I would imagine the vehicle was damaged.  I do not know if there would have been any other damage.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="202">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  You may proceed to the third incident.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="203">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>The third incident Mr Chairman, is an incident that occurred on the 16th of June 1990 and this is the attack on the SADF personnel at Rita.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="204">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Chairperson we do not know exactly how many members of the SADF were there at that time.  The attack on them should amount, as we have agreed, to an attempted murder.  I am unable to say how many of these people were shot at and how many actually got injured.  I would wish to add to this third leg that there was an illegal possession of two AK47&#039;s and an unknown number of hand grenades and there is another incident Chairperson, which no light really has ever come to let us see that incident, but the first applicant spoke about the incident.  That is, after the attack on the SADF personnel at Rita, the first applicant Mr Ngobeni scaled a fence of a school he mentioned, Maake Technical School and he dropped a hand grenade which he could not find.  	Two days after losing this grenade, he looked for it, he still could not find it, but he knows that some time after and perhaps one should warn that in the bundle of documents you will not find anything relating to this, but sometime after this incident when he went to the area, the area was cordoned off, because there was a civilian who had found a bomb, this is what people said and this bomb had exploded in this person&#039;s hand. We believe that this is the hand grenade, Chairperson and we are therefore asking for amnesty for having negligently, if one can put it so, lost the hand grenade and that a person was injured or even killed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="205">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, if I can just be of assistance here, the applicant does mention this incident on page three, that&#039;s on his original amnesty application form, page three of the bundle, he actually does mention it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="206">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Was it ever investigated, Ms Coleridge?  That is the difficulty which I think we may have, whether it was investigated whether the victim&#039;s name was traced and whether the relatives of the victim were given notice.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="207">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>Well according to our records and the docket that was obtained, the police couldn&#039;t establish whether a person was injured at the time and there was no other information that could lead us to assist us in relation to that incident.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="208">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Do we have anything on record in regard to the investigation that was done?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="209">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>Not specifically in the bundle, regarding investigations, no.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="210">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>On page three, 9(c)(ii), just below Constable Shingange, unknown victim, employee of Hillary Road Construction Company.  Wouldn&#039;t that have assisted the Investigative Unit?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="211">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>Possibly Chairperson, but as I said, we haven&#039;t received any information regarding that in terms of the investigation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="212">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>The question that remains is, was a proper investigation done and if you have nothing on record, it might present us with some difficulties.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="213">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Because when you go further down, 9(c)(iv), unknown victim - Hillary and residents of Rita and Thikiline villages.  Is that not sufficient for our Investigative Unit?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="214">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson I will have to - I will take this further and I will definitely get back to you regarding this matter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="215">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Because we have herd evidence of how it occurred, but we are really concerned about the victims.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="216">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>...(indistinct - no microphone)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="217">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>No definitely Chairperson, obviously the Commission takes that very seriously, in a serious light, the victims rights and I will definitely pursue this investigation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="218">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you for your assistance Ms Coleridge.  You may proceed Mr Koopedi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="219">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, Honourable Committee Members, that was the end of my submission.  Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="220">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Koopedi.  Ms Vilakazi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="221">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI IN ARGUMENT</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Honourable Chairperson.  With regard to the second incident, being the killing of Const Shingange on the 15th of June 1990, as indicated earlier, the application is not opposed and whether or not the applicants have complied with the requirements, the submissions of the Counsel for the applicants is not contested.  With regard to the widow of Const Shingange, the affidavit that</text>
		</line>
		<line number="222">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>she has submitted to this hearing, outlines the difficulties that she went through after the death of her husband.  Her life has been made very difficult.  She has not been able to further her studies, she wanted to become a teacher, but because of the pressure that was put on the institution where she applied, she could not be admitted to the college and this was due to the fact that she was labelled the widow of an informer.  So her life has been difficult.  She has not been able to find employment and having lost a father who was the breadwinner in the family, it has been difficult to raise the children and on that basis it is my submission that the death of Const Shingange is the direct cause of the hardships that the family has been going through ever since his death and I submit that in terms of Section 22 of the Act, that Florence Shingange be declared a victim for purposes of receiving reparation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="223">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Are you in a position to furnish us with the names and ages of the children of the deceased?  The ages Ms Vilakazi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="224">
			<speaker>MS VILAKAZI</speaker>
			<text>The eldest Sibongile Lordmade Shingange, she&#039;s eighteen years old and she&#039;s a student at Pretoria Technicon doing a diploma in accounting, she&#039;s in her first year.  The others are a set of twins, they are boys, John and Simon, they are both aged fifteen.  John is in Standard Eight and Simon is in Standard Seven.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="225">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	With regard to Lily Nthembo Shingange, she was in the vehicle which was attacked when Const Shingange was killed.  She sustained injuries in that particular attack.  Although she was not employed at the time, she was self-employed, she was selling.  Due to the injuries that she sustained during that attack, it has not been possible for her to continue selling, so she has been deprived of the ability to provide for herself and for her children.  She&#039;s got two children, a nineteen year old girl, her name is Glory, she&#039;s in Standard Ten and seventeen year old, Hopie, in Standard Seven, she has put evidence to this hearing that she has not been able to work because of the injuries that she has sustained.  She has not fully recovered from the injuries.  She still has problems with her leg.  It is my submission that her disability as it is, is a direct consequence of the attack, of the injuries that she suffered  when the attack in which she and Const Shingange were took place.  	I submit that also in terms of Section 22, that she should be considered a victim, that she should be considered for reparation.  Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="226">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Ms Vilakazi.  Ms Coleridge.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="227">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson, I have no further submissions to add.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="228">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO ARGUMENT BY MS COLERIDGE</text>
		</line>
		<line number="229">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  This has brought us to the conclusion of the hearings we were charged with at this centre.  Firstly at this late hour to pass our condolences to Mrs Shingange and the sister.  We know it has been a painful experience and as Lily Nthembo Shingange had also sustained injuries, but today at least you have come to know the reasons why your beloved one was attacked and in the process Ms Shingange received the injuries.  From today, I know it&#039;s difficult, but I hope you can close this chapter in your lives that even though it would not bring back your beloved ones, but you know the precise details of what happened and this is the function of this process, that those who remained ignorant of why some of their beloved ones were taken during the conflict of the past, why it happened, this process has been and I would refer to you specifically, brought back to you.  I know it&#039;s easy for me to speak from an armchair position, but that is precisely what happened, because today you can close that chapter and lead your lives.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="230">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I want to thank also people who do a very difficult job and we normally thank them last, but I want to bring them to the fore, to thank the interpreters who are holed in boxes and are doing a very difficult job.  Your job is much appreciated.  We thank you for assisting us in this process.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="231">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	We want to thank the legal representatives for your assistance, Mr Koopedi, Ms Vilakazi and Ms Coleridge, you have been of great assistance to us.  The Committee appreciates the input you have made and it is going to assist us in coming to a decision in respect of the three applicants.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="232">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Those who have come to attend these hearings, your efforts are much appreciated by this Committee and more specifically by my Panel here.  We say thank you very much to have made these efforts to have come here.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="233">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	To the caterers, the man who is doing a very difficult job, I wanted to come to him last, Mr Jo Japhta.  People never see him in the forefront, but without him we wouldn&#039;t have had this hearing.  He does the most difficult job, that&#039;s why I wanted to mention him last, that his name rings a bell throughout.  Thank you Jo, but I think you are going to have problems, because I&#039;m gaining weight with the food that you are arranging at these venues.  If I can, for a while, be away from you, I think I will regain my weight.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="234">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Thank you Chairman.  You know there&#039;s one thing that happens, that throughout I never lifted a plate to pour food for myself, or to dish up for myself.  Thank you.  You are very much appreciated.  I would love to have you in my hearings.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="235">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	As it is customary, we are charged by the Act to give written decisions and we shall reserve our decision and hope to give it in the near future, or the short near future, if we do have something like that.  You shall be advised personally through Mr Koopedi about our decision.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="236">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Thank you very much.  This brings us to the end of the hearings here for this week.  We were charged to take the whole week but because of your assistance, we could only be here for two days.  Thank you very much.  The Committee adjourns.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="237">
			<speaker>MS COLERIDGE</speaker>
			<text>All rise.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="238">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>HEARING ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>