<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY HEARINGS</type>
	<startdate>2000-05-24</startdate>
	<location>PINETOWN</location>
		<names>BONGANI SIDNEY DUNYWA</names>
							<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=54225&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/2000/200524pi.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="175">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>We now come to the application of Bongani Sidney Dunywa and the Committee remains the same.  The Evidence Leader remains the same and the only change is the counsel for the applicant.  Would you please put yourself on record?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, I&#039;m Marcia de Klerk and I appear for the applicant in this matter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>This is another one of the matters that we&#039;ve been hearing this week where the application forms seem to be a little out of order and the application form we have was signed on the 4th April 2000, a long time after the cut-off date but there is correspondence before us referring to an earlier application and citing the reference number and we gather that there has been some problem in getting any reply from the attorney who acted for him, who was responsible for filing some of the earlier matters.  It seems to us we can merely proceed on the basis of the application forms which is now before us unless any of you have anything to say to the contrary?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>I have no objection, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>It is clear that there was an attempt made timeously and what&#039;s happened to it we just don&#039;t know at the moment.  So are you calling the applicant?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker>BONGANI SIDNEY DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>Mr Dunywa, just to give the Committee some personal details.  How old are you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>I am 30 years old.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>Where are you presently living?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>I am residing in Johannesburg.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>With whom are you living?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>With my relatives.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>Are you married?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>Do you have any children?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>Yes I do.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>How many?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>Two.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>Okay, prior to your imprisonment, did you work?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>And now are you presently employed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>No, I am not employed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>What education did you have prior to your imprisonment?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>I had completed Standard 10.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>And what education do you have now?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m completing my MBA.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  Where were you living before going to prison?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>I resided at Paddock.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>And how long did you live there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>I think I&#039;ve lived there all my life.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>And at the time when you were living at Paddock did you belong to any political party?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>What was the name of that political party?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>It was the ANC.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>Which branch of the ANC did you belong to?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>The Potchefstroom branch.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>And how did you become to belong to the Potchefstroom branch of the ANC?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>Briefly, I was an activist, a political activist at school so that when the ANC was banned in 1990 I contacted the Potchefstroom branch and requested them to launch a branch in Paddock because there were many people who were interested in joining the organisation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>Why did you choose the ANC?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>Because I supported the policies and the objectives of that organisation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>And did you yourself play an active role in the ANC?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>Yes I did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>And what was your role?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>I was involved in educating people about the objectives, policies and the general direction that the ANC was taking and what the aims of the ANC were with regards to this country?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>And how did you go about propagating the ANC?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>I would call various meetings at Paddock.  Sometimes we&#039;ll also hold workshops spreading the message that the people should be encouraged to join the ANC.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>And how were decisions made at the Paddock branch?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>Decisions were taken at meetings.  However, at other times some decisions were taken by executive members without the knowledge of general membership.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>Did you, as a member of that branch, have any authority in the decision making process?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>Can you tell us now a bit about the political instability in the area in which you lived, in the paddock area?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>Yes I can do that.  At that time we were harassed by Security Forces and the police and sometimes we would clash with the IFP but that was not very prevalent prior to 1990.  After the unbanning of the ANC some members of the ANC left the organisation and they colluded with the police and later on started harassing the community and were responsible for the deaths of many people in our area.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>How did your branch react to the killings?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>We reported the matter and we were advised to follow this issue up and see who was in fact responsible for all these activities and doings in the name of the ANC.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>And did you follow up?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>Yes we did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>How did you follow up?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>There was a group of police who was sympathetic to the ANC but they did this covertly.  These policemen were able to give us inside information about what was going on within the police with regards their struggle that they were waging against the ANC.  Besides that we also followed up allegations about the deaths of various people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>Okay, can we move now to the murder for which you were convicted?  Who was this person?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>It was Nyani Xolo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="61">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>And did you know Mr Xolo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="62">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>Yes I knew him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="63">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>How did you know him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="64">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>We grew up together.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="65">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>And did he belong to any political party?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="66">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>As far as I know he was not affiliated to any organisation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="67">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>What did he do for a living, what was his occupation?  A student, a working somebody, what was he?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="68">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>He lived and worked in the mines but when he returned in 1990 during the political unrest he collaborated with this group of dissident members who had turned against the people and that is how he lived.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="69">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>What steps did you try to confirm that he was a member of this group?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="70">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>Firstly, as I mentioned before, there were police persons who were able to supply us with information with regards to people like him.  Moreover, he was always in the company of those people and we used to follow on their activities that they did towards the community then.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="71">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>So what was your reaction when you discovered that he was a member of this group or he associated himself with this group?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="72">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>After we had confirmed these reports, that he was indeed in collaboration with these people, we held a meeting and this matter was discussed.  The meeting decided that these people should be eliminated.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="73">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>Who called this meeting?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="74">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>It was myself.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="75">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>And where was this meeting held?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="76">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>In the Anglican Church in Paddock.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="77">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>And how many people attended this meeting?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="78">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>I think about a hundred people attended this meeting.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="79">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>And what was decided at this meeting?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="80">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>At that meeting it was decided that because of what they had done to the community, undermining the image of the ANC, it was decided that they should be eliminated.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="81">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>And how did you decide to implement this decision?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="82">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>A subsequent meeting of the executive was held where it was decided that we would form groups and those groups would be responsible for those tasks of eliminating these individuals.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="83">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>Who were the members of the executive committee?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="84">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>It was myself, Andreas Xolo, Scebe who is now deceased.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="85">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>And was the regional branch, that is the Port Shepstone branch informed of this decision that you all had taken?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="86">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>No, we did not inform them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="87">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  Can we move now to the ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="88">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Why did you not inform them?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="89">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>There were situations that were sometimes urgent and sometimes compelled that we take action immediately before we even report such instances to the branch.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="90">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>So on the evening, can you tell us about what happened the evening of the 26th October 1990?  In particular, what was the role that you played?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="91">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>I was at home all day and Comrade Dan Gumede came to me, reported that the one of the dissident people, Mr Nyani Xolo was at the bar drinking.  Then already knew of the decision to eliminate these people.  I then told them to organise or to ensure that Mr Xolo is separated from the people that he was drinking with or he waits until they disperse.  I also sent him to Comrade Tulani, that is to enlist his assistance.  We then left and then Gumede took the deceased and his companions.  After a while they dispersed after Dan had convinced the deceased to go with him.  He followed them to a bushy area and that is where we attacked Nyani Xolo.  I was armed with a sharp instrument.  The others had knives.  We left him there after he had been killed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="92">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>What was the reason were you participating in this murder?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="93">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>I had already issued out an order that he be eliminated as the chairperson and I had to ensure that order was carried out.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="94">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>And how do you feel now about that you played in that incident?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="95">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>I wish to state particularly to his family that I feel regret that he died.  However I would request them to extend their hand in reconciliation, mindful of political situation at the time because we were at war with the then government which was in collusion with the IFP and Security Forces.  Some situations pressured or compelled us to act as we did.  Perhaps the deceased could have played a constructive role in the development of this country had it been otherwise.  Therefore I reiterate to the relatives and friends for them to be mindful of the political situation at the time, particularly on the bearing it had on us as political activists.  I would request perhaps his father to place himself in my shoes and look back at what happened then.  Perhaps he would be able to see that he could have found himself in the same situation because we were advancing the objectives of the ANC then.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="96">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>What happened after the murder, did you tell anyone what had occurred?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="97">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>I did not inform anyone, not even my parents.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="98">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>Did you report the incident to the Port Shepstone branch of the ANC?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="99">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>Besides that I did not report it to my family, but I did report it to the branch in Port Shepstone.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="100">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>And what was the reaction of the Port Shepstone branch?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="101">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>They promised me that if the police follow the issue up and I am implicated they would try to assist me in getting legal representation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="102">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>Do you feel that the killing achieved it&#039;s objective?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="103">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>Yes that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="104">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>Why do you say this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="105">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>Because after his death his colleagues fled the area and carried their activities elsewhere and there was a relative peace in the area and the community understood then who had been responsible for harassing them and for the element of criminality that had existed then and the people realised who their enemy was and who was advancing the objectives of the liberation struggle.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="106">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>You were subsequently arrested, were you not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="107">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>Yes I was arrested.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="108">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>And who represented you at your trial?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="109">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>It was a Mr Siloshni Pillay.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="110">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>And who paid for your legal representation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="111">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>It was the ANC.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="112">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>And did you tell the truth at your trial?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="113">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>Yes I did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="114">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, that is the evidence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="115">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MS DE KLERK</text>
		</line>
		<line number="116">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="117">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	At the trial did you explain the political motive behind the killing of Xolo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="118">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>...(inaudible)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="119">
			<speaker>INTERPRETER</speaker>
			<text>The speaker&#039;s mike is not on.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="120">
			<speaker>MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, except Mr Chair on page 26 of the sentence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="121">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>...(inaudible)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="122">
			<speaker>MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, because he pleaded guilty, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="123">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Right, do you have any questions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="124">
			<speaker>MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>Yes Mr Chairperson.  Actually I would like to refer the Committee to page 26 of the sentence where - the fifth line</text>
		</line>
		<line number="125" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Although you may have met the deceased coincidentally on that night, the killing was nonetheless premeditated in that it flowed from an earlier decision taken at a meeting to which you were party to kill the deceased.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="126">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Would this be the meeting you were talking about earlier on in your evidence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="127">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="128">
			<speaker>MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>My question is, in court or in your statement did you explain the political motive behind the killing of Mr Xolo?  The political motive?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="129">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>Yes I did explain but the presiding judge did not take much notice of that evidence because he said many times people had killed others taking the law of the country into their hands, therefore he was not in a position to accept my reasoning and said I should have left the matter to the police but I did explain to the judge that the police were in collusion with the deceased, therefore were not going to help us but the judge did not take any notice of that explanation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="130">
			<speaker>MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>You&#039;ve indicated that you grew up with the deceased in the same area and you&#039;ve also indicated that you say he was working with the police.  What period was this, during which year?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="131">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>And this happened over a short period in 1990.  The deceased joined these criminals later.  After they had been in operation for a long time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="132">
			<speaker>MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>Why I&#039;m asking you this is because Mr - the deceased&#039;s father is here, he is present today and if it&#039;s necessary, he can come in to testify as well to the fact that the deceased was working in Johannesburg at the time of his death and he had been working in Johannesburg from about 1986/1987.  Now would you dispute this as a person who grew up with him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="133">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>I would dispute part of what you said.  I will concede that yes, he did work in the mines as stated by his father but I hope he knows that on his return in or around June 1990 he associated himself with this group of criminals.  He must know that very well.  I cannot dispute that he did work at the mines but on his return he started all these activities.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="134">
			<speaker>MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>Just hold it there.  Actually when he was killed he was working in Johannesburg, correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="135">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>I would put it this way, it is possible that he did work in Johannesburg then or maybe he was on leave.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="136">
			<speaker>MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>Let me give you direction.  According to his father he had been working in Johannesburg like I said before from &#039;86/&#039;87 and usually visited home now and again.  He used to come at home to visit and during this time he was at home on a visit.  Now my question to you is you have indicated that he joined the gang in 1990, that is June.  Or he associated himself with the members of the gang.  Exactly what did he do which showed that he associated himself with the members of the gang given the fact that he just came home to visit and he wasn&#039;t staying in the area at the time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="137">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>I would like to dispute something stated by his father.  I do not know about any employment conditions operating in the mine then but if I look at how long he was at home from June to October I do not think he was on leave, such a lengthy leave.  As regards to what he did, I would say he worked with them.  I observed that he was with them and as I mentioned before, I did receive reports from the police who worked with us and most decisions that we took then were from the knowledge gleaned from those policemen.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="138">
			<speaker>MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>In the indictment or the summary of substantial facts there&#039;s an indication that Dan Gumede once had quarrel with the deceased, Nyani Xolo, because he had slept - that is Dan Gumede, had slept with the deceased&#039;s sister without paying the customary price.  Would you know anything about this dispute?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="139">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>I do not know about that but the investigating officer did mention it to me but I knew that we were at war with the policemen so they could have fabricated, the police could have fabricated evidence to protect their colleagues.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="140">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>There was no mention whatsoever of such an incident in the judgement on sentence, was there?  In fact there the judge says he would have claimed to believe the deceased was a member of a band which committed crimes and I accept that you subjectively held such a belief?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="141">
			<speaker>MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>Yes Mr Chairperson, but in the summary of substantial evidence ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="142">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes but that is just a summary.  If such evidence had been led giving a motive one would have expected the judge to comment on it.  He has not done so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="143">
			<speaker>MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m indebted to you, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="144">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I just want to find out again, what position did you hold in your organisation at the time in 1990?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="145">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>I would say I was a political education officer as well as being chairperson of meetings that were held.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="146">
			<speaker>MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>And would you say you had the authority to give the order that Mr Xolo should be killed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="147">
			<speaker>MR DUNYWA</speaker>
			<text>Yes I did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="148">
			<speaker>MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairperson, I have no further questions but I would like an indulgence of the Chair to consult briefly with the victims just to find out if there is anything that I&#039;ve left out because they are not represented.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="149">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MS THABETHE</text>
		</line>
		<line number="150">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Any re-examination?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="151">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>Not at this stage, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="152">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO RE-EXAMINATION BY MS DE KLERK</text>
		</line>
		<line number="153">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Right, we&#039;ll take a short adjournment.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="154">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
		<line number="155">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="156">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>ON RESUMPTION</text>
		</line>
		<line number="157">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Does that close your case then?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="158">
			<speaker>MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>It closes my case, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="159">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, have you closed yours?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="160">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK</speaker>
			<text>I hadn&#039;t but I do close my case.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="161">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Right, would you like to address us?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="162">
			<speaker>MS DE KLERK IN ARGUMENT</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="163">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	The applicant is 30 years of age.  He has a matric as well as a two years of a Batchelor&#039;s degree which he intends completing.  He has brought this application under the provisions of Section 20(2)(d) and that is that the offence was committed in furtherance of a political struggle against persons who he believed to support the then apartheid government by corroborating with the Security Forces and Inkatha.  The offence was committed in the course of a reaction to a group of persons who were seen to be working with both Inkatha and the Security Forces and these Security Forces and Inkatha were responsible for destabilising and attempting to divide and to ameliorate the support for the ANC in the Paddock area from which the applicant belonged.  The applicant firmly believed that the deceased belonged to this group of persons through his association with these persons and him and his co-accused attacked the deceased and injured him which resulted in the deceased&#039;s death.  The applicant was convicted and sentenced to nine years imprisonment for which two years was suspended by Mr Justice Page.  He effectively served five years of his prison term.  I submit that the objective of the applicant&#039;s act was to eliminate the group to which the deceased belonged to as they were seen as a threat to the ANC and also not only as a threat but also as bringing the ANC in a bad light within the Paddock area.  Therefore the offence was primarily directed at the Security Forces within the applicant&#039;s area through the individuals which associated themselves to the Security Forces and the offence was committed in the execution of an order.  However, this was without the approval of the Port Shepstone branch to which the applicant was a member. </text>
		</line>
		<line number="164">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I submit that there is a direct political conflict between the applicant and the members of the ANC branch in the Paddock area and the Security Forces and Inkatha in that area during that time in 1990 and their main objective was to prevent the Security Forces from destabilising and dividing their community.  It&#039;s the applicant&#039;s evidence that after the killings the ANC was able to consolidate themselves and to renew the support for the ANC and to place the ANC in a better light in the paddock area and it&#039;s also submitted that the applicant honestly believed that after the offences which they had committed they were able to then protect the community from the violence of this group of people and Security Forces.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="165">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	It is submitted that the applicant didn&#039;t commit the offence for financial gain.  All he sought to do was to drive the Security Forces from the area so that they could strengthen their position as ANC members and I submit that the applicant has made out a case for the relief which he seeks and I ask this ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="166">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>One factor which I think should be mentioned which I should have placed on record earlier, I think, is that we have been given a letter from a firm of attorneys acting for the ANC which states that on the instructions of the Port Shepstone branch of the African National Congress, they represented the applicant apparently at his trial which would appear to indicate that the ANC also believed that it was a political objective.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="167">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Right, any submissions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="168">
			<speaker>MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>No Mr Chairperson, I have no submissions  especially in the light of the letter that you refer to.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="169">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Right thank you, we will take time to consider our decision.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="170">
			<speaker>MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairperson, that concludes our roll for today.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="171">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What time tomorrow?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="172">
			<speaker>MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>Half past nine.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="173">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Half past nine?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="174">
			<speaker>MS THABETHE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="175">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>