<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY HEARINGS</type>
	<startdate>2000-06-26</startdate>
	<location>JOHANNESBURG</location>
	<day>1</day>
	<names>MDUBEKI JOHANNES NTANTISO</names>
	<case>AM628/97</case>
						<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=54274&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/2000/200626jh.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="540">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mapoma?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, at this stage I am calling the application of Tshabalala and Ntantiso.  They are both represented by Mr Mbandazayo and Mr Tony Richard is appearing for the victims.  I do not see him here now, Chairperson.  I do not know where he is.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did you want a five minute adjournment or what is the situation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>MR MBANDAZAYO</speaker>
			<text>Yes Chairperson, I would appreciate that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I think we&#039;ll take a five minute adjournment for Mr Richard who is appearing for the victims in this matter.  If you could just let us know as soon as you&#039;re ready, Mr Mapoma, thank you.  We&#039;ll take a five minute adjournment.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker>MR MBANDAZAYO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>ON RESUMPTION</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>...(inaudible) last?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Oh thank you, I think the last application went a lot quicker than expected so it&#039;s understandable that you might have thought it might have lasted longer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	We will now commence with the application of Messrs A T Tshabalala and M J Ntantiso and at this stage I would request the legal representatives to kindly place themselves on record?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>MR MBANDAZAYO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson and Honourable Members of the Committee.  My name is Lunga Mbandazayo and I&#039;m representing the applicants in this matter.  Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Mbandazayo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>May it please, Chairperson, my surname is Richard, initials A J, I represent the Van Wyk family, the sons of the deceased.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Richard.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m Zuko Mapoma, Leader of Evidence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Mapoma.  Mr Mbandazayo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker>MR MBANDAZAYO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson, the first applicant will be Mdubeki Johannes Ntantiso and he is Xhosa speaking, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>MDUBEKI JOHANNES NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MR MBANDAZAYO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Ntantiso, is it correct that you were born on the 1st September 1965 in Gauteng?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>MR MBANDAZAYO</speaker>
			<text>Can you tell the Committee how far have you gone to school?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Standard 5.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>MR MBANDAZAYO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Ntantiso, can you tell the Committee when did you join the PAC?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>In 1988.  If I&#039;m not mistaken, it was in 1988.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker>MR MBANDAZAYO</speaker>
			<text>Which branch of PAC did you belong to?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>In the central Vaal.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>MR MBANDAZAYO</speaker>
			<text>In which structure were you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I was in the Azania and also went to the Task Force.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker>MR MBANDAZAYO</speaker>
			<text>Now when did you join the Task Force of PAC?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>In 1990 if I&#039;m not mistaken.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>MR MBANDAZAYO</speaker>
			<text>Did you undergo any training as a Task Force member?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Yes Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker>MR MBANDAZAYO</speaker>
			<text>Can you tell the Committee where did you undergo training?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>In the Transkei.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker>MR MBANDAZAYO</speaker>
			<text>In which year?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>In 1990.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker>MR MBANDAZAYO</speaker>
			<text>Who trained you in Transkei?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Judge Makakula.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker>MR MBANDAZAYO</speaker>
			<text>What were your duties as a Task Force member?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>It was to protect the comrades and leadership, PAC leadership as a whole.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker>MR MBANDAZAYO</speaker>
			<text>Now Mr Ntantiso, can you tell us about this incident of October 1993?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, just before you get onto that, Mr Mbandazayo, what was the relationship, if any, between the Task Force and APLA?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>The Task Force was a structure affiliated to the APLA.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mbandazayo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker>MR MBANDAZAYO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Now Mr Ntantiso, can you tell us about the incident of 1993?  What actually happened, what led to this incident?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>In 1993 we were coming from the meeting, Task Force meeting.  When we were next to the PAC offices, it was held at the national office, headquarters of the PAC.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And where about was that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Here in Gauteng in Johannesburg area.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker>MR MBANDAZAYO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, continue?  Just be slow, don&#039;t be fast.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>When we were next to the PAC offices in Zone 11 two white men came in khaki uniform, they were driving in two cars and another one came later driving in a Mercedes Benz and there was a lorry also behind him.  We were shocked to see the white men in the township and at the time they were not to come to the township.  We had to devise a plan and we thought that they were coming to attack because the SADF had just attacked Mbendalosa house and killed his children in their sleep and we decided to close the office and after that myself and the other members, I actually instructed the members to shoot.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker>MR MBANDAZAYO</speaker>
			<text>How many were you, who were the people who were involved in this?  Who came up with this idea, who decided that those people should be shot at?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>The six of us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker>MR MBANDAZAYO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, can you tell the Committee the names of those people?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>It was myself, Linda, Amos Tshabalala, Edgar Mohapi, Philem Fukeng and his brother.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker>MR MBANDAZAYO</speaker>
			<text>Were all of you Task Force members?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Yes that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker>MR MBANDAZAYO</speaker>
			<text>Can you tell the Committee how were you armed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="61">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>We were armed with a pump gun and a pistol.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="62">
			<speaker>MR MBANDAZAYO</speaker>
			<text>How many weapons did you have, all of you had weapons or it was few of you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="63">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>The other one had a pistol and the other one had a pump gun.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="64">
			<speaker>MR MBANDAZAYO</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I think if the interpretation is correct, the five were having pistols and one was having a pump gun.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="65">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So, yes, when I heard it my understanding was that there were just two weapons but let&#039;s just get this clear.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="66">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	So did each of you - sorry, did one of you have a pump gun?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="67">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Yes that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="68">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Who had the pump gun?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="69">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Tshabalala.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="70">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And did the rest of you, the other five, all each have one pistol or did you have one pistol between the other five?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="71">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Each and every person had his own pistol.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="72">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Mbandazayo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="73">
			<speaker>MR MBANDAZAYO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="74">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Now when you say that you decided to shoot, you mention that there were other people.  How many were they there, the white people who were there, when you shot at them?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="75">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>When we were shooting at Van Wyk the other two had already left the scene.  I don&#039;t know where they were but they left and they never came back.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="76">
			<speaker>MR MBANDAZAYO</speaker>
			<text>Okay, can you tell the Committee who actually shot the victim?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="77">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>It was Tshabalala.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="78">
			<speaker>MR MBANDAZAYO</speaker>
			<text>So he used his pump gun?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="79">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Yes that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="80">
			<speaker>MR MBANDAZAYO</speaker>
			<text>And after shooting him what did you do?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="81">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>They retreated on foot and I went back driving in a car.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="82">
			<speaker>MR MBANDAZAYO</speaker>
			<text>Why did you take the car?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="83">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>We were going to use the car, we were about to take the car to the Transkei.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="84">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>This is the car that belonged to the deceased?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="85">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Yes that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="86">
			<speaker>MR MBANDAZAYO</speaker>
			<text>To whom were you going to take the car to Transkei?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="87">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>We were going to take it to the commander, Judge Makakula, commander of APLA.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="88">
			<speaker>MR MBANDAZAYO</speaker>
			<text>You mentioned in your evidence that it was after the attack of the Mbendalosa family in Umtata.  Was it the reason why you attacked Mr van Wyk or was it one of the reasons that you attacked him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="89">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>It was just one of the reasons.  The main reason was the fact that during that year it was declared by our commander, Sabelo Pama, that it was the Year of the Great Storm.  The Year of the Great Storm meant the community should fight the system who was in place at the time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="90">
			<speaker>MR MBANDAZAYO</speaker>
			<text>Now you&#039;ve mentioned correctly that it was the Year of the Great Storm but Mr van Wyk was a geologist, he was working there, just an innocent person.  He was not a member of parliament, he was an ordinary citizen and if I may used the word soft, he was just a soft target, somebody who was harmless and had nothing to do with - what do you say to that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="91">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I can say Mr van Wyk was one of the people who were benefiting from the old regime.  The reason for me to say so is because they had voting rights and they are the people who put the Nationalist Party Government in place.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="92">
			<speaker>MR MBANDAZAYO</speaker>
			<text>Now what you say if an argument comes up and says look, this has nothing to do inasmuch as you were members of PAC or in Task Force but the incident had nothing to do with politics, it was just a criminal offence, just a plain robbery.  What would you say to that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="93">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;ll dispute that because this was politically motivated because anyone who knew, everybody knew that in 1983 that that year was declared as the Year of the Great Storm.  On top of that, during that same year, the PAC offices were being attacked all the time by the then government.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="94">
			<speaker>MR MBANDAZAYO</speaker>
			<text>Now Mr Ntantiso, what do you say now to the family of the deceased?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="95">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I can say I sympathise with them today.  I have deep feelings and about what happened to Van Wyk on that particular day that he became one of the victims of the political violence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="96">
			<speaker>MR MBANDAZAYO</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, that&#039;s the evidence of the applicant at this stage.  Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="97">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR MBANDAZAYO</text>
		</line>
		<line number="98">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Mbandazayo.  Mr Richard do you have any questions you&#039;d like to put to the applicant?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="99">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>I do Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="100">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I see that it&#039;s almost 1 o&#039;clock, would this be a convenient time to take a lunch adjournment?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="101">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>I believe it&#039;s convenient.  It&#039;s 1 o&#039;clock.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="102">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I see it&#039;s 1 o&#039;clock, we&#039;ll take the lunch adjournment now and if we could start at quarter to two?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="103">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m in agreement with that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="104">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="105">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="106">
			<speaker>MDUBEKI JOHANNES NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>(s.u.o.)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="107">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Mr Richard?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="108">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="109">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Ntantiso, I see from your application at page 8 that you were born in the township of Bopalong.  Now how far away from Sebokeng is Bopalong?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="110">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>It&#039;s quite a distance but I cannot say for sure how much distance is involved.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="111">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Would you agree or disagree, it&#039;s about 10,15 kilometres away?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="112">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I cannot dispute that and I cannot say yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="113">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>But Bopalong is near Sebokeng, Sharpeville, they&#039;re all in the same area?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="114">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Yes that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="115">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now for how long did you live in Bopalong?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="116">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I cannot remember, it&#039;s possible that we left in 1979 or in the &#039;70s.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="117">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>And then did you go to Sebokeng?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="118">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>We went to Everton before relocating to Sebokeng.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="119">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>And now for how long did you live in Sebokeng?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="120">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I cannot remember, Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="121">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Was it one year, five years?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="122">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Many years to such an extent that I cannot remember.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="123">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>So it&#039;s true to say that you grew up in the Vaal Triangle, Everton?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="124">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Yes that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="125">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now where in Sebokeng precisely was the PAC office in 1993?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="126">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Where this incident took place was in Zone 11 and the other one was in Zone 12 and the other office was in Everton.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="127">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So the office that you&#039;re talking about was the office that was in Zone 11?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="128">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Yes that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="129">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>And I see your address is given as Zone 11?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="130">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Yes that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="131">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now isn&#039;t it true to say that immediately across the way from the place where the PAC had it&#039;s office in Zone 11, there&#039;s a football field, a sports area?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="132">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Yes that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="133">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now how often had you been to the office in Zone 11?  Was it once, twice or many, many times?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="134">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I cannot say but I used to frequent the office.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="135">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now the day in question, what time did you arrive at the office in Zone 11?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="136">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I cannot say about the time but I think it was during daylight.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="137">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Was it in the morning or the afternoon?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="138">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>It was not in the morning but it was during the late hours of the morning.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="139">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>The late hours of the morning?  Is that your answer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="140">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>It was in the morning but not very early in the morning.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="141">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now were you aware that work was to be started on that football field in front of the PAC office to build a sports stadium?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="142">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I knew nothing but that&#039;s why I was shocked.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="143">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>What were you shocked about?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="144">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I was shocked to see the whites inside the township because at the time whites wouldn&#039;t set their foot in the township.  The only whites that would go into the township would be escorted by the ANC members.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="145">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now at any rate we&#039;ve now discovered that you arrived there late morning.  Did you go away from the office?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="146">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="147">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now if I tell you that that day there was a drilling rig on the football ground outside your office, a big machine, big truck?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="148">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Yes that is so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="149">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now so that means you would agree with me that when the drilling rig gets ready to drill the hole in the ground it stands about two and a half stories high?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="150">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I cannot say but I agree that there was a drilling machine.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="151">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>And it was drilling the whole day then, making a lot of noise?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="152">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I agree.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="153">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>And did you see people around the drilling machine, working the machine and working in the holes that it had dug?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="154">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="155">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>So you wouldn&#039;t dispute it if I told you that on that day the deceased, as a geologist, had a device, a tripod which would lower him down into the holes and he would go and take samples from the hole and he would come out, samples of soil?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="156">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I know nothing about that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="157">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Did you look at them drilling?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="158">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>No I was standing at a distance as they were working there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="159">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>But it wasn&#039;t more than one and a half football field lengths away?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="160">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I went there to attack only, I didn&#039;t go there to observe people working there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="161">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now, it&#039;s also true that this Mercedes was parked very near the PAC&#039;s office, outside in fact?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="162">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Yes that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="163">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, Mr Richard, if I could just ask a question?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="164">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	This PAC office, what was it?  Was it a high rise building with an office or was it situated in a house?  If you could just describe the PAC office very briefly please?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="165">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>It was a building with a room.  A building that was connected in some business building where the shops were.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="166">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Was that a one or two story high building, three storeys?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="167">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>It was just a single building.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="168">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now where we had got to was that you were aware that this Mercedes was parked right outside near your office and you had noticed that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="169">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Yes I saw it parked in front of the offices and on the football ground.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="170">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now how far from your office was the Mercedes?  Can you estimate the distance?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="171">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I cannot estimate in terms of metres because I don&#039;t know much about such measurements.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="172">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Can you point it out a distance in this room here?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="173">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t want to commit myself because this incident took place some time ago.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="174">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Was it near or far?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="175">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I think it was nearer, much nearer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="176">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Now what time of the afternoon did the shooting happen?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="177">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I do not know but I think it was when he was preparing to leave.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="178">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Was that late afternoon or home time or just after lunch?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="179">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>It was in the afternoon.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="180">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Late afternoon, home time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="181">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, home time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="182">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now if I ask you specifically, you&#039;ve already given a description, what did you see the deceased wearing?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="183">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I cannot remember.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="184">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Didn&#039;t you say he was wearing a uniform?  I think that was my notes, there was mention made of them saying uniforms?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="185">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="186">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I didn&#039;t say that Van Wyk was in a khaki uniform but his two colleagues were wearing khaki clothes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="187">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes my notes say</text>
		</line>
		<line number="188" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;When next to the PAC offices in Zone 11, two whites in khaki uniform came in two cars.  Later another came in a Mercedes Benz.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="189">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>But he didn&#039;t mention what the person who came in a Mercedes Benz was wearing.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="190">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now if I put to you as a matter of fact and we can prove it if the need arise, that the deceased was wearing a blue worker&#039;s overall.  Would you dispute that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="191">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I cannot dispute that because I cannot remember that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="192">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now you make a statement.  You say the deceased had two colleagues.  Now please tell us exactly why you say the other people were his colleagues?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="193">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I am saying that because when he arrived he went straight to them and talked to them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="194">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now if I say he was there all day, what time do say he arrived?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="195">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;ve already said that I can&#039;t remember the time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="196">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I think that from what he says it must be inferred that it was sometime either late morning or after that because he only arrived at the PAC offices in late morning, he said.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="197">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Well, can you give us some indication as to when you say you saw the deceased arrive?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="198">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m trying to say that he came after these two white men who were in khaki clothes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="199">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>And what did he do then, after he spoke to these two people, according to your version?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="200">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>They started working with their lorries.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="201">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>What were they doing with their lorries?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="202">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I was not very much interested and I was not interested in all what they were doing.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="203">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>But when you say they were working with their lorries, that&#039;s what you&#039;ve said.  What were they doing with their lorries?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="204">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Their machine was on, the machine that you referred to was on and I don&#039;t know what is it that they were doing.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="205">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>And how long was the deceased busy with his machines?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="206">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I cannot recall.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="207">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;ll put it to you that in fact a Mr Maputa will say that he was busy for a long time with this machine all day?  Do you dispute that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="208">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Do you want to say that we shot this person as he arrived or you want to say that we shot at this person as he was busy working?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="209">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Sir, I don&#039;t answer your questions.  You answer my questions.  My question was, do you dispute the statement that there is direct evidence available that he was busy with his drilling machine all day, for a long time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="210">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I did mention that when we shot at him it was during the time when he was about to leave.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="211">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>That is not an answer to my question.  My question to repeat it for the third time is do you dispute the statement that the deceased was busy with the drilling machine for a long time, in fact most of the day?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="212">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I cannot dispute that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="213">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>And then it closed from that answer that it was patently and clearly obvious to anyone in that environment that he was busy with the drilling machine and that it was a matter of easy and ordinary observation to see it.  The machine was making a big row and it was obvious to everyone?  Do you dispute that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="214">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Which one?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="215">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>My proposition is, do you dispute that if a man was busy with that machine most of the day, climbing in and out of the hole on this hoist, it would have been easy for anyone who had any ears and eyes to see, to see what he was doing?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="216">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I want to say he was busy with the other people that he was working with there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="217">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>And you also said that you weren&#039;t very interested in what he was doing?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="218">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I was not interested because I didn&#039;t even know what he was doing there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="219">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now what made you think that the deceased was likely to attack your office?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="220">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>As I have indicated that two white men came before him and then he later came and I became suspicious because there was an attack before that.  Mbendalosa&#039;s children who were attacked by SADF members and they could do anything, they had so many tricks, they could even come closer to our offices so that they could manage to attack our offices.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="221">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Was the deceased alone when he was shot or with other people?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="222">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>He was with his colleagues, people who were working with him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="223">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Who were these people?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="224">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I do not know them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="225">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Were they black or white?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="226">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>They were black.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="227">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now what made you form the opinion that the deceased posed a threat, as you say he did, to your office?  What was he doing to make you fear him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="228">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;ve just mentioned about the incident that took place in Mbendalosa&#039;s premises in the Transkei.  That is the reason that made me not to trust any situation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="229">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, if I may just intervene, Mr Richard?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="230">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Didn&#039;t you say, Mr Ntantiso, that at the time the deceased was shot he was about to leave, his cars were locked in the car and they were trying to get the keys, that he was going to go away and that his other two white colleagues had already left?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="231">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I became suspicious in the morning when he was with his three colleagues.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="232">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>No, but I mean at the time of the shooting, were you of the impression that he was on his way out?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="233">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Yes that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="234">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Richard?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="235">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Now if we turn to page 27 of the bundle, paragraph 5, you say there</text>
		</line>
		<line number="236" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;The two white men then departed.  Van Wyk was then alone on the scene.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="237">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Do you confirm what you said in your statement?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="238">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="239">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now, then earlier on in that paragraph you describe the scene of people being around the car.  What were they doing?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="240">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Some of them were just standing, staring at what was happening there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="241">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>And what were the others doing?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="242">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Most of them were just standing.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="243">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>The ones who weren&#039;t just standing, what were they doing?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="244">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>People that I could see were the people who were standing.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="245">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Was anyone trying to get keys out of the car?  What did you see to make you make that statement?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="246">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Yes it is correct, that is why I&#039;m saying when we came it was during the time he was trying to leave because on our arrival I realised that although I cannot remember if it was Van Wyk or somebody else who broke the car window to get the key that was inside the car.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="247">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now in your affidavit you say you drove that car away, is that not correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="248">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Yes that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="249">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now which window was broken, according to your version?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="250">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I didn&#039;t hear that, if you could just repeat the question, Mr Richard?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="251">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>The first question was, is it not correct that you drove the car away and he said yes and then I&#039;ve asked the next question, which window was broken, according to his version.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="252">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>The window at the back, the very small window at the back.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="253">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The quarter window at the back.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="254">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>On the left or the right?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="255">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>If I&#039;m not mistaken it was the right window.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="256">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>And now what would you say if I have witnesses who saw the car in the hands of the police after the incident who will swear that there were no windows broken at all?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="257">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Those would be the witnesses who would be telling lies.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="258">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Very well.  Now we go back to paragraph 5, the second last - well, it&#039;s not the second last sentence, the second last sentence in the first paragraph.  There you say under oath</text>
		</line>
		<line number="259" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;When I climbed in the car the engine was already running&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="260">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>So you&#039;re saying that when you climbed into the car the engine was already running?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="261">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="262">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Who had started the engine?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="263">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>It was Mr van Wyk.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="264">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now when he was shot, was he in or out of the car?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="265">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>He was outside the car, standing next to the door of the car.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="266">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Why had he got out?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="267">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I cannot tell.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="268">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>If I put it to you that the correct version is he had got out and spoken to one of his workers who were drilling holes with him and told them to close the top of the holes so people wouldn&#039;t fall into it, would you dispute it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="269">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>No, I know nothing about that.  I cannot even recall that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="270">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Did he talk to people while he was out of the car?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="271">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I cannot recall.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="272">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now where were you when he was standing next to the car?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="273">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I was standing next to the car door.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="274">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now did he get shot before you got into the car or after you got into the car?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="275">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>When he was being shot at I jumped into the car.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="276">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>If I understand your answer you&#039;re saying he was shot while you were getting into the car.  Is that your answer?  Not before or after?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="277">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>When he was being shot or after being ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="278">
			<speaker>INTERPRETER</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, I&#039;d like to get it from the witness first before interpreting?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="279">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, Mr Ntantiso, if you could just repeat your answer please for the translators?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="280">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I got into the car after he was shot.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="281">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>I put it to you that it&#039;s a different answer to what you&#039;ve just given as a question before?  Then you said ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="282">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>My notes are, is that</text>
		</line>
		<line number="283" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;when he was being shot at I jumped into the car.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="284">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Which of the two answers is correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="285">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I am trying to explain that when he was being shot at I jumped into the car and then you are asking me again at what time did I get into the car.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="286">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, there is a process of getting into the car and being in the car.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="287">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Right, if we go back to paragraph 5, at page 27, there&#039;s a sentence which says</text>
		</line>
		<line number="288" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I then said to Tshabalala that as soon as I was behind the steering wheel of Van Wyk&#039;s car, Van Wyk must be shot.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="289">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, where about is that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="290">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>It&#039;s ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="291">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Oh yes, I see it there, sorry.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="292" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR RICHARD</text>
		</line>
		<line number="293">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	&quot;I then said to Tshabalala that as soon as I was behind the </text>
		</line>
		<line number="294">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	steering wheel of Van Wyk&#039;s car, Van Wyk must be shot, </text>
		</line>
		<line number="295">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	which he then did.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="296">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>In that one, if I read that and interpret it correctly, you were already behind the wheel when the shooting happened?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="297">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Maybe your Afrikaans is better than mine, Mr Richard, but my - is he saying that he said that after he was sitting or was this a pre-plan?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="298">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>I understood that Chairperson - I&#039;ll just reread it</text>
		</line>
		<line number="299" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I then said to Tshabalala that when I was behind the wheel of Van Wyk&#039;s motor car, Tshabalala must shoot&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="300">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s how I&#039;ve interpreted it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="301">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, alright.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="302">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now in your affidavit you say that&#039;s what happened, you were behind the wheel already when Tshabalala shot Mr van Wyk?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="303">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I think it&#039;s the mistake from the person who was writing down the statement.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="304">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now tell me, once you drove the car away, where did you go to?  How far away did you take the car, where did you take it to?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="305">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I went to park the car at Zone 4.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="306">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>And then did you turn the car off then?  You had the keys?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="307">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Yes I switched the car off.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="308">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>And when did you try and turn on the car again?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="309">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>In the evening.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="310">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>And what happened?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="311">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>It couldn&#039;t start.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="312">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Do you know why it couldn&#039;t start?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="313">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>If I&#039;m not mistaken I think the problem was with the immobiliser and the secret switch.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="314">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>That is quite correct.  I can tell that I also have a witness that will say, if need be, that this particular Mercedes had a very particularly unique immobiliser which meant that you had to put one finger on one contact and another finger on another contact to activate the circuit and that unless you knew what you were doing you would never start the car and for that reason you in fact pulled out the wires under the dashboard to try and hot wire it.  Would you dispute that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="315">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>No, we connected one wire to the battery and the other one to the coil and then the car could start thereafter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="316">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>But what it also means is that Mr van Wyk had had to get into the car to start it before he was shot and get out again.  Would you dispute that?  And that&#039;s in fact what you saw him do?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="317">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I do not know that, we did not know that the car had an immobiliser.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="318">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Do you dispute that to start the car Mr van Wyk first got into the car, started the car and then got out again before he was shot and you saw it, you were standing next to the car?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="319">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>As I have indicated that when this was happening, the car was on or rather idling.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="320">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Is it not correct that you said you were standing next to the car?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="321">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is true.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="322">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>And you were watching what was happening?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="323">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="324">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now I say to you that on the basis of what you saw and on the evidence that I can lead, if it&#039;s necessary of the immobiliser, it meant that you must have seen him get into the car and out of the car and started while inside?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="325">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I cannot recall whether he started the car as I was standing there and I cannot see him operating, doing anything or fiddling with the secret switches or whatever.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="326">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Was he inside the car when he started the car?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="327">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>You were standing there watching him, you were about to steal the motor car and attack him according to your version?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="328">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I cannot recall, this incident took place some time ago.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="329">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>And that would mean that you&#039;re not in a position to contradict a witness who would gave a version that it was necessary to do that to start the car, in other words to climb into the car, activate the car by getting rid of the  ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="330">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I cannot dispute that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="331">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>And that means, the fact that you didn&#039;t see it is simply that you can&#039;t remember it because it&#039;s so long ago?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="332">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Yes that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="333">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now while you were getting into the car or in the car, where was Mr Tshabalala.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="334">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>They were retreating on foot as planned but I was going to use the car and they were going to walk.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="335">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>We know ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="336">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, Mr Richard, if I may once again just intervene briefly before I forget?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="337">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Yes Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="338">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You say that they were retreating on foot according to plan.  When did you actually formulate the plan to steal the car?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="339">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>The stealing of the car was not planned but we only planned that we were going to kill Mr van Wyk and his colleagues.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="340">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>When was that plan formulated?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="341">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>When he was still busy there on the football ground.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="342">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Before I go to that, where was Mr Tshabalala standing when he shot Mr van Wyk?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="343">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>He was next to me, he was in front of me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="344">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>How far away?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="345">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Nearer, much nearer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="346">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>One metre, two metres?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="347">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I do not want to commit myself but he was much nearer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="348">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Was he distance of one of the tables or half the table?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="349">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>He was just a the distance where my legal representative is.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="350">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>That is immediately next to him.  There&#039;s a matter of centimetres between the two of them, less than 30 centimetres between the two of them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="351">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>And that would mean that Mr Tshabalala was right next to you at the right hand door of the car?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="352">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Yes that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="353">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now how far away from Mr Tshabalala was Mr van Wyk?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="354">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>He was not far but I cannot say how many metres.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="355">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Again, if we use the table as a measure, was he one table away, two tables away, across the room?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="356">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>He was much nearer though I cannot say, I cannot estimate but he was much nearer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="357">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Can you point between yourself and the interpreters?  Point a distance that Mr van Wyk was away?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="358">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>This is just an approximate, Mr Ntantiso, it&#039;s not an exact amount, we just want an estimation of the distance between Mr Tshabalala and the deceased at the time the deceased was shot?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="359">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I do not think he was beyond that line.  There&#039;s a line on the floor.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="360">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Is this the red line on the floor?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="361">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, the red line on the floor.  I cannot say he was beyond that point.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="362">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s - I don&#039;t know if counsel agrees, about three metres?  Three and half metres?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="363">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Three to three and a half metres.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="364">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="365">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now did you see Mr van Wyk being shot?  Did you witness the shot?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="366">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I saw him falling and screaming.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="367">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now where in his body did the shoot gun blast hit him?  Was it on his head, his chest, where?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="368">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>In the leg.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="369">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now to help you I can say that according to those who identified him after his death, there was a tourniquet about mid-thigh which is above the wound.  So would you agree when you say in the leg he was shot somewhere below the mid-thigh?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="370">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I cannot dispute that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="371">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now while you were in Transkei, you received weapons training, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="372">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Yes that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="373">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now did that entail being given the opportunity to practise using the weapon?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="374">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Yes that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="375">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>And Mr Tshabalala was given the same training?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="376">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="377">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>So wouldn&#039;t you agree with me that a distance of some three, three and a half metres, if someone was shot below mid-thigh with a shotgun, that was a deliberately aimed shot?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="378">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="379">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now you said to me that you had decided earlier that day to kill Mr van Wyk and his other so-called colleagues?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="380">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="381">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now if you intended to kill a man would you shoot him in the lower leg?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="382">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The lower thigh.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="383">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>The lower thigh.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="384">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Let me explain this.  As he was being shot at he was not the only person there at the scene.  There were other people there from the township.  I cannot answer for Tshabalala because he was the one who was pulling the trigger, he was the one who knew how did it come about for him to shoot him in the lower thigh.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="385">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>My question is that if you shoot at a man to kill somebody like you had decided to do, do you shoot him in the lower thigh between the thigh and the knee?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="386">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>He is asking what you would do if you were shooting to kill somebody, would you shoot him just above the knee?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="387">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>It depends on the environment and you&#039;ll have to consider the safety of the other people who are not your targets.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="388">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, Mr Richard.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="389">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	This pump gun, what sort of gun was it?  Was it shotgun?  What sort of bullet did it shoot?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="390">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Pellets.  It produced pellets.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="391">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So it was a shotgun with a pump action.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="392">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Right.  Thank you Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="393">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Now where in the Transkei were you trained.  In which town or village?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="394">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>In Port St Johns.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="395">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>And for how long were you there for training?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="396">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Two months.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="397">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now what were the various things that you were trained in?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="398">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>How to operate a firearm.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="399">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>And what else?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="400">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>How to administer handgrenades.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="401">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>And what else?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="402">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Respect discipline.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="403">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>And what tactics were you taught.  To use your words &quot;fight the system in place, at the time.&quot;  What were the tactics you were taught to use?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="404">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>The tactics to fight the system was to attack his instrument or subject so that they could get the message.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="405">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>To attack the systems instruments.  What are the system&#039;s instruments?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="406">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Those were the people who had voted for that government or the white people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="407">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now I&#039;m going to separate that into two.  The people who had voted the government into power, in your mind at the time who had voted the government into power?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="408">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>white people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="409">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Did that mean that every white person had voted the government into power?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="410">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>He had done that by choice.  Whoever did not vote for that government was by choice.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="411">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t understand your answer.  Are you saying that white people had a choice to vote for the government or against the government and some voted for the government and some voted against the government.  Is that your answer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="412">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>All the whites were represented in the parliament, they had their own representatives in parliament, all of them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="413">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>So that means that in your mind there was no such thing as a white person who didn&#039;t vote for the government?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="414">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Any person who wouldn&#039;t vote, that was his right but all the white people were given the right to vote.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="415">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now do you agree with me that some white people voted for the government and some didn&#039;t vote at all and some voted against the government?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="416">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m getting that for the first time from you, Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="417">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Tell me, prior to 1994, is it not true that there were white people who opposed the government?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="418">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Yes that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="419">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>And some of the people who opposed the government used their vote as a method of opposition - one of the methods, in other words by not voting or spoiling their paper or voting for another party besides that party?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="420">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>If you want us to talk about the 1994 situation about the white people who did not vote for the National Party, most white people who joined the ANC joined it because they wanted to protect their business interests.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="421">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m talking about before 1994, I&#039;m not talking about 1994.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="422">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I do not know anything that was taking place in the parliament before 1994 because at the time I was fighting in the jungle, I did not have any representative in parliament.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="423">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Do you say that Sebokeng is the jungle?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="424">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>When I say that was in the jungle, I&#039;m trying to say that Pan Africanist Congress and the ANC were in the jungle together with AZAPO.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="425">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now we are looking at this question.  Why did you shoot Mr van Wyk?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="426">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>It is solely because Sabelo Pama declared 1993 as the Year of the Great Storm.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="427">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Be careful, you have said it is solely because Mr Pama declared 1993 as the Year of the Great Storm.  Is that your answer, is that the only reason why you shot Mr van Wyk?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="428">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Let me explain this concept.  If 1993 was declared as the Year of the Great Storm, the meaning was like anyone who felt oppressed should direct violence to the government by all means.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="429">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now on that rationale, you&#039;ve agreed that some white people didn&#039;t support the government?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="430">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>What people are those?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="431">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Are you saying all white people supported the government prior to 1994?  The old government?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="432">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Even those who were opposing that government, they were killed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="433">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>So you were prepared to kill your allies simply because they were white?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="434">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>The whites were opposing the Nationalist government?  Are you talking about those?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="435">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="436">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I couldn&#039;t kill them because they were also fighting in the liberation struggle, they were also fighting for freedom.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="437">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now when you saw a man drilling holes to build a sports stadium, how do you know which way he voted, whether he supported the government or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="438">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>First of all I didn&#039;t even know what his intention was by drilling the holes.  All I knew was that the government was in power, that particular person was benefiting in that government.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="439">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Then your answer is that you wanted to shoot Mr Pama to kill him ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="440">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr van Wyk.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="441">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Mr van Wyk, for no reason other than that he was white?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="442">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>No, when he was killed we were trying to overthrow the then government.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="443">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>How would killing one white man who is alone in Sebokeng at the time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="444">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>I think you should, Mr Richard, ask that question bearing in mind what he said earlier, that one of the tactics was to kill these people even if they are individuals.  That&#039;s the tenor of his answer, that to send the message.  Now I don&#039;t think it would be in context if you were to say one white man because he has put that into context that that would send a message to the government.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="445">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, with the greatest of respect, well that might be a construction of his answer.  There are other constructions which are equally probable and apparent and I would like to hear what the witness says for himself?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="446">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, just repeat the question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="447">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Please repeat the question, Sir?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="448">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now my question is simple.  Why did you kill Mr van Wyk?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="449">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>When Van Wyk was killed the intention was to overthrow the then government.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="450">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>My next question is how did you see the killing of Mr van Wyk would achieve that end?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="451">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>He was not the only target there were also other people.  For instance the St James incident, Helderberg Tavern and even his colleagues, they had a narrow escape because they were not present during the shooting.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="452">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Sorry Mr Richard, if I could just come in here?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="453">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Certainly Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="454">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Why did you not attack Mr van Wyk at the time his other white colleagues were also there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="455">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>They couldn&#039;t waste time there, they just came for a short while and they left.  For us to shoot Mr van Wyk later, it is because we were waiting for the other two to come back so that we could attack them altogether but unfortunately the other two did not come back, that is why we decided to attack at least Mr van Wyk.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="456">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Now the truck that was there drilling a rig, who was operating the rig, who was operating that truck?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="457">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I have no knowledge.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="458">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Did you not see people around that truck, whether white or black?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="459">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>The only white there was Mr van Wyk.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="460">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Are you saying that the only person you saw was Mr van Wyk?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="461">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>He said the only white person there was Mr van Wyk.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="462">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Oh, sorry.  Thank you.  You may proceed Mr Richard.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="463">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="464">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, if you don&#039;t mind Mr Richard?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="465">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Just explain here, was he - Mr van Wyk, was he assaulted before he was shot?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="466">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="467">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="468">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now if you turn to page 31 of the bundle, you&#039;ll see that amongst the things that were removed was one brown wallet and one men&#039;s wristwatch.  Now where were the wristwatch and the wallet found?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="469">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>They were in the car next to the gear lever.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="470">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>And when you drove the car and turned it off and got out did you take the watch and the wallet out with you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="471">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I saw these articles when I was packing the car and I took them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="472">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>And how much money was in the wallet?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="473">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>There was no money, it was just a wallet and the wristwatch.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="474">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>And where did you put the wristwatch once you took it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="475">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I kept it for some time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="476">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>For how long?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="477">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>For that night because the following day I was arrested and then it was confiscated.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="478">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>In other words you had appropriated the watch to yourself?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="479">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>No, not at all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="480">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>What were you going to do with the watch?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="481">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I was going to give it to my commander because we were about to go to Transkei with the car.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="482">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Who was your commander?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="483">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Judge Makakuna.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="484">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Where was Judge Makakuna?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="485">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>We were going to meet in the Transkei at the funeral of Mr Mbendalosa&#039;s children.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="486">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>That was held in Umtata, Mr Richard.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="487">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="488">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Thank you Chairperson, I think I&#039;ve more or less concluded but before concluding ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="489">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You can consult.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="490">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>No further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="491">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR RICHARD</text>
		</line>
		<line number="492">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Richard.  Mr Mapoma, do you have any questions that you would like to put to the applicant?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="493">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>None Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="494">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR MAPOMA</text>
		</line>
		<line number="495">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mbandazayo, do you have any re-examination?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="496">
			<speaker>MR MBANDAZAYO</speaker>
			<text>None Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="497">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO RE-EXAMINATION BY MR MBANDAZAYO</text>
		</line>
		<line number="498">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Judge Motata, do you have any questions you would like to put to the applicant?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="499">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Just one Chairperson, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="500">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Ntantiso, the next day where were you driving the car to because it was parked at Zone 12.  When you took it from Zone 12 where were you taking the car to?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="501">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>We took it that very same day, parked it at Everton on that very same day after the incident.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="502">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Didn&#039;t I perhaps make a mistake - I may have, that you said you took it to Zone 12, Sebokeng?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="503">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>I took it Zone 12 during the day and then in the evening we took the car to Everton.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="504">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>To who at Everton?  I&#039;ll tell you why I&#039;m asking you that because somewhere in the papers I read that you were going to use it as transport to attend a funeral in the Transkei.  In Umtata in the Transkei?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="505">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Where I had initially parked the car in Zone 12 there was no garage, it was the open space and at least in Everton it was protected and we would wait, it would wait there until the day of leaving for the funeral comes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="506">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Where precisely in Everton where it would be protected?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="507">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Next to the graveyard.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="508">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Is there a garage at the graveyard, because at Zone 12 there was no garage?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="509">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>At that stand or site there was a garage.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="510">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Who lived there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="511">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>It was Linda&#039;s relative.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="512">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Was it arranged with Linda&#039;s relative that you would bring a vehicle, motor vehicle to be parked in their garage?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="513">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Linda told us that it was a good idea to take it there.  We did not know whether he had prearranged that with the relatives or not.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="514">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Did you reach Everton?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="515">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="516">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Parked it in the garage?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="517">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="518">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson, I&#039;ve got no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="519">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Sandi, do you have any questions you&#039;d like to ask?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="520">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Yes Chairperson, maybe one or two.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="521">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Was this your first operation as a member of APLA?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="522">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Except for transporting guns or weapons, it was the first operation there in killing of the settler.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="523">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Just explain something to me here.  Did you see the deceased as a threat?  Did he pose a danger to you or anyone in that vicinity?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="524">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>The manner in which the three of them came, we saw them as a threat in our office because the PAC offices those days were subject of frequent attacks and even the PAC members were being attacked by the police and SADF members.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="525">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Is that the reason why you attacked Mr van Wyk?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="526">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>This is just one of the reasons for us to attack him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="527">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>If you did not feel that he was posing a danger to you and your PAC offices, would you still have attacked him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="528">
			<speaker>MR NTANTISO</speaker>
			<text>Yes we were still going to attack him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="529">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Thank you Chairperson, no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="530">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mbandazayo, any questions arising out of questions that have been put by Members of the Panel?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="531">
			<speaker>MR MBANDAZAYO</speaker>
			<text>None Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="532">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MBANDAZAYO</text>
		</line>
		<line number="533">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Richard, any questions arising?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="534">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>None Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="535">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY RICHARD</text>
		</line>
		<line number="536">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mapoma?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="537">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>None Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="538">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MAPOMA</text>
		</line>
		<line number="539">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Ntantiso, that concludes your evidence.  You may stand down.  If you would just swop seats with Mr Tshabalala?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="540">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>