<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY HEARINGS</type>
	<startdate>2000-06-28</startdate>
	<location>JOHANNESBURG</location>
	<day>3</day>
	<names>PATRICK NHLANHLA RADEBE</names>
	<case>AM5894/97</case>
						<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=54293&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/2000/200628jh.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="535">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mapoma, Mr Sandi does not have his bundle here, it is in the room I think.  Thank you, we will now commence with the hearing of Mr P.N.M. Radebe.  At this stage, I would request the legal representatives to kindly place themselves on record.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>I am Advocate T.A.N. Makhubele from the Pretoria Bar, representing the applicant, Patrick Radebe.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>I am O.P. Nyawuza from Johannesburg, representing P.G. Motaung, Christina Ntabiseng and Ntauleng&#039;s mother.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Nyawuza.  Mr Mapoma?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairperson, Zuko Mapoma, Evidence Leader.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.     Yes, Ms Makhubele, you are going to be calling the applicant?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chair, yes, I will lead the applicant.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>PATRICK NHLANHLA RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Ms Makhubele.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Mr Radebe, you are also known as Modibedi, that is your other surname?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I see from the application form, Ms Makhubele, that he actually uses the name Modibedi as his surname?  Which is the correct one to use, Radebe or Modibedi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>We can use Radebe, because I used to use the Modibedi surname, I now use Radebe.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>It is not a question of what name you are using, we want to know what your legal, correct name is.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Radebe, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>So in other words we should call you Mr Nhlanhla Patrick Radebe?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I noticed it has been pointed out to me, in your trial the name used was Modibedi?  Was that an alias or just an assumed name by yourself?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Ms Makhubele?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chair.  How old are you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>I am 29 years old.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>You reside at Sebokeng in the Vaal, Vereeniging area?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, Mr Radebe, if you could speak a little bit louder, because there are people sitting in the audience who would want to hear what you are saying.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Yes Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>You are before this Committee for an incident which occurred on the 15th of October 1998 at Sebokeng, an incident for which you were ultimately convicted by the Court where you kidnapped and assaulted some people, is this correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, he also applies for, I see, robbery?  Is that right, and public violence?  Page 2 of the Bundle?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>You were ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, is that correct, is he also applying for robbery and public violence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chair.  This incident occurred on the 15th of October 1998, can you tell ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>No, no, is it not 1988?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>1988 yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You said 1998?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>I am sorry Chairperson.   Can you tell this Committee whether at that time, you were a member of any political organisation and if so, your capacity in that organisation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>I was a member of COSAS and the ANC Youth League.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Did you have any position there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>No, I was just an ordinary member.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Can you describe the political situation, anything like unrest, violence at that time and the parties involved, or the people you were fighting against?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>I will explain it this way.  We had many informers in our area, other comrades also acted as informers against others.  They were taking information from the organisation, to the Special Branch police.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	As members of the organisation, we decided that we have to deal with such people, we have to discipline them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Who were the people identified as informers?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Those were the people who turned against the comrades in court, and they became State witnesses in court.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Anyone in particular?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>One of them was Ntabiseng, Baseka and Ntauleng.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Who else?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>I do not remember the others, but there were many.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>With reference to the incident for which you are before this Committee, are these the victims, the people you have mentioned?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>You mentioned Ntabiseng, Ntauleng and Baseka, there are three?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>How were you to deal with them?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>We were to discipline them, that will depend on the type of discipline that we decide to ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Can you tell us what happened to them on the specific day, the 15th of October 1988?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>On the 15th of October 1988, in Zone 14 in Sebokeng, we went to fetch them using a furniture van, we were taking them to Soweto, we were going to attend a night vigil of our comrades but unfortunately we could not reach the destination.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Did these three people stay in one house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="61">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Can you tell us how you took the first one, Ntabiseng from her home?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="62">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>We fetched Ntauleng first, but she did not open for us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="63">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>What did you do to her house or home?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="64">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>They shouted and said they would call the police and we broke a few windows and we retreated.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="65">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Before you proceed, you keep on saying we, with whom were you when you did these things?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="66">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>We were eight in number.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="67">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Can you specify names?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="68">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>It was Terrence Mkwehli, Struggle Mokoena.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="69">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, Terrence Mkwehli?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="70">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Yes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="71">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Struggle Mokoena, Josias Motlung, Vusi Motaung, Goodwill Masimola and Benni Jekelha.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="72">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Are these the people who were your co-accused in the trial?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="73">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="74">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>So you did not manage to take Ntauleng our of her house, but you caused damage to her home?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="75">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="76">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>What was the purpose of causing this damage to her home?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="77">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>I did not see the person who actually broke the windows, I only saw the broken windows, while they were shouting that they will call the police.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="78">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="79">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Then you left, to whose home?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="80">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry could you repeat your question please, your microphone was not on.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="81">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>After Ntauleng&#039;s home, which house did you proceed to?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="82">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>We went to fetch Baseka.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="83">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>What happened there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="84">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>We knocked, pretending to be policemen and he opened the door.  He was taken out by Terrence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="85">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, before you proceed ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="86">
			<speaker>INTERPRETER</speaker>
			<text>The speaker&#039;s microphone.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="87">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, when you talk about going and fetching Baseka, are you talking about Baseka George Motaung?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="88">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="89">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="90">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>What was your role at his home?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="91">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, was the microphone on?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="92">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>What was your role at Baseka&#039;s home?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="93">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Because we were many, I was not able to enter the house, but he was taken out by the other comrades.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="94">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Did you see if any force was used on him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="95">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>I saw them dragging him outside, and they took him to the car.  That is the only thing that I saw.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="96">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>And then, what happened next?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="97">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>He managed to escape, we ran after him but we could not catch him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="98">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, were you people in your sound and sober senses?  I am just wondering how one man is being dragged out of his house by eight people, just manage to escape and none of you can catch him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="99">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>He was fighting while we were trying to force him into the van, that is how he managed to escape and we tried to run after him, but we could not manage to catch him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="100">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Proceed, where did you go to next?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="101">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>We went to his neighbour, that is where Christina Mfolo stays.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="102">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>What happened there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="103">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>We knocked, pretending to be the police, and they opened the door.  I don&#039;t know who dragged her from the bedroom, I only saw her in the kitchen.  She was dragged out and taken to the car.  She was forced into the car, in the front seat, and then we left to Soweto as we planned.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="104">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry before you proceed, Ms Makhubele, what was her name, you say Motiso Mfolo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="105">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Christina Mfolo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="106">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Christina Mfolo, is that the same as Christina Ntabiseng?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="107">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="108">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Did you do any specific thing to her or at her home?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="109">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>No, we did not do anything.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="110">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>I am referring to yourself, did you hold her, drag her, or did the knocking at her home?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="111">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>No.  The person who dragged her to the outside, was Struggle, I did nothing.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="112">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Who was driving the vehicle?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="113">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>That is Struggle Mokoena.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="114">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Was she assaulted in any manner?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="115">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>She was seated in the front seat, I was at the back of the van, so I did not see her being assaulted.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="116">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>You mentioned that you did not get to where you were going ultimately, what happened?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="117">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Somewhere in Soweto, I think that was around Dube, we were confronted by the police, but we did not stop and they chased us and they shot at us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="118">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	We ran away, so I don&#039;t know what happened thereafter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="119">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>When the police shot at you, the only person amongst the three victims was Ntabiseng?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="120">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="121">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>You have heard during consultation when I informed you that Baseka has made a statement where he states that he was actually put in the truck and he was assaulted, he only escaped at the point where the police - where you met the police, what do you say?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="122">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>That is not the truth.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="123">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Is it possible like the situation of Ntabiseng, like you say he was seated on the front, that Baseka was also in the front and as such, you did not see him being assaulted?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="124">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>No, the last time that I saw him was when he ran away and we could not manage to catch him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="125">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>What were you going to do to Ntabiseng in Soweto?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="126">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>That would depend on the discipline that we had decided then.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="127">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>What would you like to say to the people you kidnapped on that night, Ntauleng where you damaged the window panes at her home as well as George, who managed to escape and Ntabiseng who you ultimately took along to Soweto?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="128">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>I would ask them to forgive me for what I did to them, but I did that under what was happening then.  That is all I can say to them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="129">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>How many, or rather, what was your sentence at the trial for this incident?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="130">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>I was sentenced to seven years imprisonment.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="131">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>How many did you serve?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="132">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Two years and some few months, I don&#039;t remember the months.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="133">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Evidence-in-chief.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="134">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MS MAKHUBELE</text>
		</line>
		<line number="135">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Just before I ask Mr Nyawuza.  If you turn to page 2 of the documents, it says here he is applying for amnesty for public violence, what does the public violence relate to?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="136">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>When I refer to public violence it is because we were charged for this in court.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="137">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Does that relate to the incident that took place at the house where the windows were broken?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="138">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="139">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And it says kidnapping, okay, you have told us about that, assault, okay, you have told us about that, and then robbery, what, you haven&#039;t said anything about robbery to us yet?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="140">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>It is because it was alleged that we robbed that car from the owner.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="141">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Which car?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="142">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>That is the furniture van that we used to travel to Soweto.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="143">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>It was alleged, what do you mean by that?  Are you saying that you didn&#039;t do it, or what?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="144">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>We took it by force from the owner.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="145">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What sort of vehicle was it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="146">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>It was a furniture van without a canopy at the back.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="147">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And who was the owner?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="148">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t know the owner.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="149">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did you take it by force?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="150">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>He was packing at a certain house in Zone 14.  We took the keys from him and we took the van.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="151">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What did you do to the owner?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="152">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>We did nothing to the owner.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="153">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What was the political motive in hijacking the van?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="154">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>We took that van because it belonged to the whites, and we did not want to see the white&#039;s vehicles in the township.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="155">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Was the driver or the owner who you took the keys from, a white person?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="156">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>No, the driver was a black person.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="157">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So, what was the name of the furniture company from whom it was stolen, who owned the van?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="158">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>I do not remember the name of the furniture shop.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="159">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So how did you know that it belonged to the whites when you took it from a person who was not white?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="160">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>We asked him about the car, because it was written that it belonged to a furniture company.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="161">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So you are saying the only reason you took the vehicle was because you thought it belonged to a white person?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="162">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it belonged to a white person.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="163">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>That is the only reason why you took it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="164">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>It is because we wanted to use it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="165">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, precisely, wanting to use it for your own purposes?  Mr Nyawuza?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="166">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson and Honourable Committee Members.  I would wish to put it on record that the victims, they advised me not to oppose amnesty.  They feel it was, everything was done within the political turmoil that was prevalent at that time, but they would wish that I get a few answers from the applicant.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="167">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Certainly.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="168">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson.  Mr Radebe, how many vans were used on this particular day, there were eight of you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="169">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>We used one van.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="170">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Isn&#039;t it correct that there were two vans involved, Mr Radebe?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="171">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>That is not true.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="172">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Radebe, my instructions are that Baseka was in the van that did not have a canopy and Ntabiseng was in the other van, in front, what is your comment on that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="173">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>I would only agree that Ntabiseng was in the van that I was travelling with, I don&#039;t know about the other van.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="174">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>In the van which you were in, were all your seven comrades with you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="175">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, all of us were in that van.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="176">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Radebe, do you know a guy by the name of Sixteen?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="177">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I know the name.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="178">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Will I be correct Mr Radebe if I say Sixteen was present on this particular day?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="179">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>He was not amongst us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="180">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Are you in essence Mr Radebe saying there was some other independent group or why are you saying he was not amongst you, are you saying he was not there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="181">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>He was not amongst the people I was with.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="182">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Radebe, during your evidence-in-chief it emerges as if you did not have anything to do with the breaking or the getting into the house, tell me what you in particular did on this particular day, did you throw a stone, did you stab somebody, did you drag any person, what is it that you in particular, did on that particular day?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="183">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>My role was to identify those people we were going to fetch, there was nothing else that I did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="184">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Radebe, let&#039;s now go back.  You get into Ntauleng&#039;s yard and the occupants of the house do not open for you, how were you going to identify Ntauleng?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="185">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>If they had opened the door, I would enter and identify Ntauleng.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="186">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>And Mr Radebe, the occupants of the house do not open, the window panes are broken, are you saying you did not take a part in that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="187">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>No, I did not take part.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="188">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Radebe, are you saying to this Committee today that you were not as agitated as your other comrades were, who went to an extent of breaking the window panes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="189">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>I was agitated, but I did not allow my emotions to control me to that extent of breaking the windows.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="190">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Radebe, the window panes are broken at Ntauleng&#039;s house, you now go to Baseka&#039;s house.  As the person who was supposed to identify Baseka, will I be correct to say that you were in front?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="191">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>I was not in front.  He was dragged by the people who were in front.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="192">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Radebe, I haven&#039;t arrived yet at the dragging.  You are from Ntauleng&#039;s house, you are now going to Baseka&#039;s home.  The people that you are with, Mr Radebe, don&#039;t forget, do not know Baseka, you have to identify Baseka.  Invariably you&#039;ve got to be in front to be able to say &quot;this is the guy that you are looking for&quot;?  Further, you stated that you knocked at the door, and then are you still saying that you were not in front, Mr Radebe?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="193">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>I was not the only person who knew Ntauleng and Baseka, there was another guy also who knew them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="194">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>But your evidence today is that you were the person who was supposed to, you didn&#039;t tell us about the other guy who was supposed to identify these people, why not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="195">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>I was only referring to my role.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="196">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Okay, tell us then who identified Baseka, is it you or the other guy?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="197">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>That was the other guy.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="198">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>And where were you during that identification period?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="199">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>I was outside.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="200">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Are you saying you never set foot inside Baseka&#039;s house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="201">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>No, I did not.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="202">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>The assault, didn&#039;t you assault Baseka?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="203">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>No, I did not.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="204">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Radebe, my instructions are that you stabbed Baseka, what is your comment on that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="205">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>No, it is not true.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="206">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Radebe, whilst on Baseka, you have this van, Baseka is dragged out of the house, invariably I believe he was also dragged from the yard into the van, can you tell us what ultimately, you are standing outside, you know, you are observing everything that is happening because according to your testimony you are not taking part in the assaulting, in the beating of Baseka, so I am inclined to believe that you were observing everything that happened.  Baseka is dragged from the house, Baseka is taken to the van, what subsequently happened?  Was he ultimately put into the back of the van or, you know, take us through that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="207">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it is true, he was dragged to the van, that happened very quickly.  He managed to escape from that van.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="208">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>When did he manage to escape, Mr Radebe?  Did he manage to escape after you had also found Ntabiseng and put her in front, when did he escape?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="209">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>He was left with three people, while other people were at Ntabiseng&#039;s place.  That is how he managed to escape.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="210">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Radebe, there is eight of you, and a few is a relative term, what do you mean when you say when there were a few people, were there four people guarding Mr Motaung, Baseka or were there two people or were there six, what is a few?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="211">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>If I am not mistaken, three people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="212">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Are you saying the other five people went to Ntabiseng&#039;s place of residence, is that so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="213">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="214">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Were you amongst the people that went to Ntabiseng&#039;s place?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="215">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="216">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Were you able to get - a follow up on that question, there is five of you, can you tell us the name of the people that you were with, that entered into Ntabiseng&#039;s place?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="217">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>I was with Terrence, Struggle, Josias and Vusi Motaung.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="218">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>So these were the five people that entered Ntabiseng&#039;s place of residence, is that so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="219">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Before we entered at Ntabiseng&#039;s place, that is when they shouted and we ran away.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="220">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Who shouted and what were they shouting about?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="221">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Those three people who were with him, they were shouting that he is escaping.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="222">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Radebe, on Baseka, I put it to you that my instructions are that Baseka was stabbed, assaulted, doused with petrol and made to lay at the back of that van, what is your comment?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="223">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>No, I don&#039;t know that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="224">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry Mr Nyawuza, were any of you armed with a knife?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="225">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>No, we were not thugs, we did not have knifes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="226">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Were any  of you armed with a firearm?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="227">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>No, we were not armed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="228">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You see, why I ask is if I look at Mr Baseka George Motaung&#039;s statement on page 16, he says  and I don&#039;t know if you can make a comment on it</text>
		</line>
		<line number="229" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;... they smashed window panes and I opened the door and they started assaulting me by kicking, beating by a gun butt and being stabbed by a knife at the back.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="230">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	And then he says they drove, he talks about going along the Golden Highway until Johannesburg and he said he couldn&#039;t even walk, he tried to walk later, an fell.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="231">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>No, I don&#039;t know this.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="232">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Do you dispute that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="233">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="234">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Radebe, has your legal representative told you what you need to do here to get amnesty?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="235">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, she told me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="236">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Do you know that full disclosure is one of the requirements?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="237">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="238">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  I believe that after some of your comrades shouted and said Baseka is running away, you were part and parcel of the people that tried to chase after Baseka, is that right?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="239">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="240">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>And you couldn&#039;t catch up with him, is that so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="241">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="242">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>And how many people did you assault at Baseka&#039;s home, did you assault Baseka alone or were there other people that were assaulted?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="243">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Only Baseka was dragged out of the house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="244">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry were window panes broken at his house like he says in the statement?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="245">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>No, that is not true.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="246">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Radebe, my instructions are that window panes were broken at Baseka&#039;s house, his younger brother was attacked, his father was attacked, in fact his younger brother known as Rangwani had to undergo surgery  because of the beating that he got on that particular day.  What is your comment on that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="247">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>I know nothing about that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="248">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>The said Rangwani, I have requested that he avail himself today, I hope he is here, to confirm that he was assaulted on that particular day and he had to undergo surgery.  Baseka&#039;s father was hacked above the right eye and he sustained an open wound?  Your comment, Mr Radebe?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="249">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>That is the first time that I learn about that, today.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="250" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>JUDGE MOTATA:   Mr Nyawuza, if I may just interrupt there,</text>
		</line>
		<line number="251">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Mr Radebe have regard to page 13 of the documents.    You </text>
		</line>
		<line number="252">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>mentioned that you were with Vusi and Vusi mentions that you </text>
		</line>
		<line number="253">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>were in his company, do you see that?  Look at paragraph 2 -</text>
		</line>
		<line number="254">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>		&quot;... we were about five, namely myself, Patrick </text>
		</line>
		<line number="255">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>		Modibedi, Struggle who was the driver, Terrence </text>
		</line>
		<line number="256">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>		and Chauke.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="257">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Do you see that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="258">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I do see.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="259">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>And further down he says, that would now be the fourth paragraph</text>
		</line>
		<line number="260" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;... we started at Ntauleng&#039;s place and we smashed the window panes, and they did not open the door and we proceeded to Ntabiseng and we got hold of her and we also got Baseka, who later escaped while on our way to Soweto.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="261">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	So the impression I get from the statement that is made, is that he did not escape whilst you were getting into Ntabiseng&#039;s place, he was in that van, and he escaped en route to Soweto?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="262">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>No, that is not true.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="263">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>You may proceed, Mr Nyawuza.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="264">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Radebe, I am going to revert back to the question that were asked by the Chairperson, were you in your sober senses on that particular day?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="265">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="266">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Okay, Mr Radebe, let&#039;s now go to the last person to whose house you went, that is Ntabiseng.  You run after Baseka, you cannot get hold of Baseka, you come back, what happened?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="267">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Then we went to Ntabiseng&#039;s place.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="268">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Got into the yard, did you break that door, did you break the windows, what happened?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="269">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>We knocked at the door and they opened the door.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="270">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Who opened the door, Mr Radebe?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="271">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>I do not remember, because all of us entered.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="272">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Radebe, the door is a very small entrance that one can use, you cannot be eight of you going in at the same time.  There&#039;s got to be one or two people going in at the same time?  When did you get into the house, Mr Radebe?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="273">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>I was the fourth person to enter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="274">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>And by the time that you entered, where was Ntabiseng?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="275">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>I think she was in the dining-room because they were dragging her into the kitchen.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="276">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>And you were not playing any part in the dragging and assaulting, Mr Radebe?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="277">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>I also dragged her, but that is when we were outside.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="278">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Radebe, do you remember me asking you about Sixteen?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="279">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I do remember.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="280">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Are you aware that I don&#039;t know Sixteen, I have never seen him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="281">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="282">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>And I was told about Sixteen by Ntabiseng.  My instructions, Mr Radebe is that Ntabiseng&#039;s uncle opened the door for you, Ntabiseng hid under the ward rove and you looked for her for some time, you couldn&#039;t find her, on your way when you were about to leave the house, Sixteen went into the bedroom, looked under the ward rove and said &quot;here is this bitch, she is hiding&quot;, what is your comment on that, Mr Radebe?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="283">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>No, Sixteen was not with us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="284">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sixteen, where do you know him from?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="285">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>I knew him in 1986 while we were in detention.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="286">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Is he one of your comrades, was he a member of COSAS and the Youth League and that sort of thing?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="287">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>He was just a thug.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="288">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>A thug?  So he wasn&#039;t one of your group, is that what you are saying?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="289">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I would say so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="290">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Nyawuza?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="291">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson.  Mr Radebe, here are three people, Baseka, Ntabiseng and Ntauleng&#039;s mother, they were victims of an assault on a particular day when the house, Mrs - Ntauleng&#039;s mother&#039;s house was attacked, Baseka was beaten, stabbed, Ntabiseng was beaten and they come before the Truth Commission, they say &quot;okay, we are aware that at the time there was this mishap, there was this problem between us and the comrades which we vigorously tried to address with them, that we did not testify against our own comrade of our own free volition, we were made to testify against him.  We will come to the TRC Committee and say we forgive Mr Radebe, because we know he was acting within the prevalence of this violence at the time&quot;, they are seated here, they want to hear you tell the truth.  Do you still think that if they feel you are not telling the truth, are they going to forgive you, are they going to say they are no longer opposing amnesty, Mr Radebe?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="292">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Well, I don&#039;t think so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="293">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Radebe, what is it that you stand to lose if you tell the truth because my instructions and what you are saying here, contradicts each other a lot?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="294">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You might as well add that the Panel aren&#039;t bound by the fact that a victim does not oppose an application, we&#039;ve got to take a look at the criteria before we make a decision.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="295">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>May you please repeat that question again?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="296">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>My question is, you - people were victimised on a particular day, they come to the Committee they are saying &quot;we don&#039;t have anything against you being granted amnesty&quot;, but they are seated there and they feel that you are not telling the truth, you are not talking about the stabbing, about the assault, in actual fact, on this particular day you were an angel, your duty was only to point out  &quot;this is the person who testified against  us&quot;, are you saying, are they going to feel the same after you have given testimony after I cross-examined you, are they still going to say they would have wanted you to get amnesty for this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="297">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>What I am saying here today is what happened that day.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="298">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>You said there was only one van involved, is that so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="299">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="300">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>My instructions are that there were two vans involved, the van that was in front had Ntabiseng in it, and the van that was behind the one that Ntabiseng in it, had Baseka, what is your comment on that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="301">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>I only know of one van.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="302">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>And Mr Radebe, my instructions are that after you had got hold of Ntabiseng, both vans left Everton using the side that goes to, I don&#039;t know whether you call it Chinatown, but they are saying ...(indistinct) in their African language, that is the route that was used.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="303">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	It is on that route that the car that Ntabiseng, managed to go through and the one behind, was spotted by the police officers, and they suspected something and in fact, Baseka was told not to do anything, and he jumped when he saw the hippo.  All of you guys who were in that motor vehicle, escaped, but unfortunately, apparently one of you was arrested, my instructions are not clear as to who was arrested at the time.  Are you, what is your comment on that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="304">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it is true that one person was arrested, but that happened in Soweto.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="305">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Radebe, Mr Motaung was part and parcel of you on that particular day, is that so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="306">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Are you referring to Vusi Motaung?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="307">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Radebe.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="308">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="309">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>And we now, we have his affidavit, we have a statement, sorry, a statement by himself saying that Baseka escaped on your way to Soweto, so are you trying to tell us that your presence at Baseka was your way to Soweto?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="310">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>That is what I said before, maybe he was unable to explain it clearly here in his statement.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="311">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Can you think of any reason Mr Radebe, why Mr Baseka should make a statement to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission Investigator saying that he was stabbed, the windows at his house were broken, that he was beaten with the butt of a gun, that he had to receive hospital treatment after the incident, because of the injuries he sustained, can you think of any reason why he should come up with that version, which is entirely disputed by you even after you have been sentenced in respect of this incident and something that happened, that is in the past, can you think of any reason why he should be making up this version against you at this stage?  You have already served your sentence, you are already out of prison for serving it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="312">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>It is the first time that I learnt about this, because he never said this, even in court during our trial.  I don&#039;t know the reason why he is saying this today.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="313">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Mr Nyawuza?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="314">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Radebe, did Ntabiseng testify against your in your trial?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="315">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, she did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="316">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Radebe, why would four people, Mr Vusi Motaung included, lie about your participation in this thing, in this, in what happened on this day?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="317">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t know the reason.  It can also happen that he has forgotten what has happened on that day.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="318">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Radebe, would he forget that at some stage you were on your way to Soweto with Baseka, I mean you went out to get these people and you found them, you know, it is something that one glorifies, &quot;we have undertaken our duty fairly well&quot;, and I wouldn&#039;t forget if I was Mr Motaung, Vusi Motaung.  What makes you think that he would forget such a thing?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="319">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Maybe he has made a mistaken when he was writing the statement, he must have forgotten some important issues.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="320">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Radebe, to wrap up your evidence, did you assault anybody on this particular day?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="321">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>No, I did not assault anybody.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="322">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Did you break any window on this particular day?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="323">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>No, I did not break any window.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="324">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Will I be correct to say that you were the saint who didn&#039;t do a thing on this day?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="325">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>I was not a saint on that day, because these people were supposed to be taken to Soweto, maybe  I would have taken part in Soweto, if we had managed to arrive.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="326">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>What is it that you intended doing to these people when you reached Soweto?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="327">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>I have explained before that they were going to be disciplined, but that would depend on the type of discipline that would be meted against them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="328">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry Mr Radebe, why take them to Soweto for that purpose, weren&#039;t you all from Sebokeng area?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="329">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>We were taking them to Soweto because there was a night vigil there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="330">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I just want to get this straight, you and the people that you were with, planned to go to Soweto to attend a night vigil, but you also, because you wanted to discipline these other people who had testified against one of your friends in a court case, you took them with you to Soweto, just because you were going to Soweto to attend the night vigil, is that the reason or was it necessary for them also to be disciplined by people who were in Soweto, that is what I am trying to find out?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="331">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>No, it is because we were also going to the night vigil in Soweto.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="332">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Now these people that you were with, these other seven people, whose names you mentioned, were they members of COSAS and the Youth League, all of them?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="333">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="334">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Radebe, do you know a guy by the name of Dog?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="335">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Dog is my nickname.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="336">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Okay, Dog was your nickname?  Where were you seated in the van that was going towards Soweto, were you seated in the back or in the front?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="337">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>I was seated at the back.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="338">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Radebe, why are my instructions that you were seated in front with Ntabiseng?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="339">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>I was seated at the back.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="340">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, this is the furniture van with the flat back?   So you were exposed to the elements outside?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="341">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="342">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>I have no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="343">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR NYAWUZA</text>
		</line>
		<line number="344">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Nyawuza.  Mr Mapoma, do you have any questions that you would like to put to the applicant?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="345">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Yes Chairperson.   Mr Radebe, I just want before I proceed, to get this clear from you, are you aware at all that even if you were a member of a political organisation and even if the victims do not oppose your application for amnesty, as long as you do not tell the truth in this hearing, you do not qualify for and you will not get amnesty, are you aware of that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="346">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I do know.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="347">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  Let&#039;s start here.  Is it your evidence that during 1988, you were a member of the ANC Youth League?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="348">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="349">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Were you a card carrying member of the ANC Youth League then?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="350">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="351">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Are you sure?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="352">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>I was a member, because at that time, political organisations were banned, I was not a card carrying member.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="353">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Then why did you lie and say that you were a card carrying member of the ANC Youth League in 1988?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="354">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>It is because we, all the time we were guided by the ANC.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="355">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>I thought during 1988 the youth were organised in South Africa, following the policies of the ANC, were members of the South African Youth Congress?  I thought so, am I wrong?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="356">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>I have stated earlier that I was a member of COSAS when I was a student.  Then later I became a member of the ANC Youth League.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="357">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, Mr Mapoma, just to intervene, to get it on record, at that time you would have been almost 17 years of age, is that correct, at the time of the incident?  I see from your form, your birthday was the 1st of November 1971 and this happened during October 1988, just before your 17th birthday, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="358">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="359">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry Mr Mapoma.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="360">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson.  I put it to you that during 1988 the ANC Youth League was not operating in South Africa, inside the country?  What is your comment?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="361">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Perhaps I did not understand because I said that I was a member of COSAS, then I thought at the same time that I was a member of the ANC Youth League.   As I was a young person at that time,  I thought that I was a member of the ANC Youth League.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="362">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Let&#039;s leave that point.  Now, when you went to Baseka&#039;s home, were you in one group, all of you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="363">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="364">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>And do I understand that that very same proceeded as that group, to Ntabiseng&#039;s home?  Is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="365">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>I said three people remained with Baseka, and the five of us went to Ntabiseng&#039;s place.  They were neighbours, that is Baseka and Ntabiseng.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="366">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>At what stage did Baseka escape?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="367">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>He escaped while we went to Ntabiseng&#039;s place.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="368">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I thought earlier in your evidence, and just correct me if I am mistaken, didn&#039;t you say that Baseka escaped as they were trying to push him into the vehicle, because you will recall I asked you whether you people were in your sound and sober senses when Baseka escaped as there were eight of you, he managed to escape and run away successfully from the eight of you and you said he escaped when he was being pushed into the vehicle.  That is what you said earlier?  What is the position?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="369">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Actually before you respond, I have a note that he was fighting, while you were forcing him into the vehicle?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="370">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What is the position, did he escape while being forced into the vehicle or did he escape whilst he was being restrained near his house, when the other five of you went to the next door house, to get Ntabiseng, what is the position?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="371">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he was fighting back, because he was trying to disembark from the van.  He was on the back of the van, and he was fighting, so I don&#039;t know whether when he escaped he was in the van or he was out of the van.  I am not sure of that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="372">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mapoma?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="373">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>So is it your evidence now that when he escaped, you were not there in the group?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="374">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I was not with the group that was left with him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="375">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mapoma, just for me to interpose briefly, where was this van parked when Baseka was taken out of the house into the van, where was it parked in relation to the house of Baseka?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="376">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>It was in front of the house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="377">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you sir.  When he escaped, that is Baseka, as you say, had you already gained access into Ntabiseng&#039;s home?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="378">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>No, we were still knocking.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="379">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>And you saw him run away while you were still knocking at Ntabiseng&#039;s home, is that what you are saying?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="380">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Those people who were left with him shouted and said that he was escaping, and then we saw him escaping.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="381">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>So when Ntabiseng was taken out of his house, out of her house, Baseka had already run away, is that your evidence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="382">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="383">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>And at that time, the members of your group, where were they, those who were left with Baseka, at Baseka&#039;s place, where were they now when you were gathered outside with Ntabiseng?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="384">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>They had already joined us at Ntabiseng&#039;s place.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="385">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>So is it your evidence that at the time when Ntabiseng was taken out of the house, there was nobody at Baseka&#039;s place?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="386">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>No, I don&#039;t remember that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="387">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>I am asking this question because Ntabiseng in her evidence, I mean in her statement says that whilst she was - I just want to read it for you, on page 20 of the Bundle, paragraph 4, the last line she says</text>
		</line>
		<line number="388" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;... before I got into the car, I saw another group at Baseka&#039;s house and I don&#039;t know what happened to him.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="389">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t know that, because there was no fence between the two houses, that is Ntabiseng&#039;s place and Baseka&#039;s place.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="390">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>What is it that you don&#039;t know?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="391">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>I do not understand your question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="392">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Your answer is that you don&#039;t know, the question was this is what Ntabiseng says, what do you say to the statement of Ntabiseng, is it correct or incorrect?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="393">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>I am saying there was no other group at Baseka&#039;s place.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="394">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairperson, that is all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="395">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR MAPOMA</text>
		</line>
		<line number="396">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Do you have any re-examination Ms MAKHUBELE?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="397">
			<speaker>RE-EXAMINATION BY MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Honourable Chairperson.  Do you know if any of your co-accused at the trial, Vusi ...(indistinct)  Motaung  in particular, has applied for amnesty?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="398">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Well, I don&#039;t know.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="399">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>There is no indication from the records, the Bundle, but can you tell us if you recall from the trial how many charges or counts of assault you were charged with, by saying how many people testified at the trial that you assaulted them, or were assaulted?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="400">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>I only remember Ntabiseng, that was on assault.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="401">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>That is all?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="402">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>That is all, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="403">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>I have no further re-examination.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="404">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MS MAKHUBELE</text>
		</line>
		<line number="405">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Judge Motata, do you have any questions that you would like to put to the applicant?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="406">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Just clarification, Chairperson, thank you.  Mr Radebe, have regard to page 8 which is the typed version of your statement, contained on page 9, look at the seventh paragraph.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="407">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	You say there -</text>
		</line>
		<line number="408" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;... we were five comrades, that is myself, Vusi, Terrence, Chauke and Struggle&quot;,</text>
		</line>
		<line number="409">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	and in your evidence you said that you were eight, oral evidence?  Do you recall the precise number, or are you taking the number of the persons charged which would appear on page 28 of the Bundle?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="410">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>I do not remember other people, but I take this number from the number of people I was charged with.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="411">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, but then why did you in your statement say there were five of you and then you mention their names, you can see for yourself, it is there?  Is that just an oversight?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="412">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Because when you gave evidence, you even mentioned Mgwedi, you remembered precisely the people there, but in your statement Mgwedi does not appear?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="413">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>I think it is a typing mistake here.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="414">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Let&#039;s have regard to the written statement then.  It commences on page 9 and if you go to page 10, that would be the third paragraph</text>
		</line>
		<line number="415" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;... we were about five comrades, that is myself, Vusi, Terrence, Chauke and Struggle ...&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="416">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>So it is a correct typing because it accords with the written version?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="417">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>I did not write the statement, I think the person who was writing the statement for me, made a mistake.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="418">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Is this not your handwriting, you asked somebody to write for you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="419">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>It was written by the Investigating Officer who came to me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="420">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>What standard did you reach at school?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="421">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Standard 5.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="422">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>If you have regard to the statement by Baseka, I will find it shortly.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="423">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>It is on page 16 of the Bundle.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="424">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Page 16?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="425">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>He says in the second paragraph</text>
		</line>
		<line number="426" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;... in 1988 after testifying against one comrade, Ace Motaung, I do not remember the date, when a group of comrades arrived with four car and a truck of furniture, it was about eleven o&#039;clock&quot;,</text>
		</line>
		<line number="427">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>how many cars were you using on that particular day or vehicles, to put it much better?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="428">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>We used one car.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="429">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>And again I asked you this earlier, do you still disagree with Vusi when he says that would be on page 13, that Baseka escaped whilst you were on your way to Soweto because that is the person that you remember also in your statement, mentioning that Vusi was present when this incident occurred?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="430">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>When Vusi was writing his statement, I was present.  That is when the Investigating Officer was visiting us, it can be a mistake by the Investigating Officer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="431">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>He also mentions five people, those are the people that you mention in your statement, that would be the second paragraph on page 13?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="432">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>That is why I say it may be a typing machine because he was just asked to confirm or deny what I had already stated in my statement.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="433">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Are you suggesting that these statements were taken when both of you were in the presence of each other?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="434">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I was present when we went to Vusi&#039;s work place.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="435">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Now just lastly, on page 8 again, and I would refer you to paragraph 4</text>
		</line>
		<line number="436" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;... we started at Ntauleng&#039;s place and we smashed the window panes and could not succeed as they did not open ...&quot;,</text>
		</line>
		<line number="437">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>when you refer to &quot;we smashed&quot;, who are you referring to because the impression that I am gaining is that you participated in the smashing of the window panes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="438">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>The reason why I say we smashed the windows is because we were many there, so I did not see who actually smashed the windows.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="439">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>You were eight according to your oral evidence, that is not a large group, was it?  You were eight according to yourself?  You are not talking of a more, or were there other people whom you cannot recall?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="440">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>No, it is not so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="441">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>So you mean the seven obscured your view or obstructed your view to see who actually smashed the window panes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="442">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>The only thing that I remember is that when these windows were smashed was at the time when we were leaving and the people were noisy, so I did not recognise who actually did it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="443">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>So if I understood your evidence, oral evidence, it is that you were one of the two that had to point out these people, would I be right?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="444">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="445">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>And if that happens, obviously you must be in front, because you must point out these people?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="446">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="447">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>And at these other places where the door was kicked and that kind of thing, did you see who did that, because you say you did nothing?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="448">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Like I said, the person who was leading the group when they went to Baseka&#039;s place was Struggle because he was the person who knew Baseka.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="449">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Did he kick the door, was it Struggle who kicked the door?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="450">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>No, we knocked pretending as policemen, but we knocked forcefully.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="451">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Did you knock, you personally now, forcefully?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="452">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I was knocking at the other door.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="453">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Now let&#039;s get the picture now, because when you say the other door, which door are you referring to?  Didn&#039;t you people use one door where you knocked and gained entry?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="454">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>We knocked as police, the other people were knocking at the door, others knocking at the windows, but they opened only one door, that is the kitchen door.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="455">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Which door now, we know there is a front door and a kitchen door if I know the typical township house, which door did you use, the front door or the kitchen door?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="456">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>We used the back door, that is the kitchen door.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="457">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>No, I don&#039;t mean entry, I mean the knocking, because you said others were knocking somewhere and you knocked at the kitchen door.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="458">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>There is a door in the front, and the other one at the side.  As we knocked at the front door, we also moved around to the other door.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="459">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>All of you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="460">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>We were not at one door at the same time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="461">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>How many were at the kitchen door where you knocked?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="462">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>I knocked at the dining-room door, but they opened the kitchen door at the back, that is the door which we used to get inside.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="463">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>How many were you who knocked in the front, on the front door?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="464">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>We were two.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="465">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson, I&#039;ve got no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="466">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Judge Motata.  Mr Sandi, do you have any questions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="467">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, just one question for clarification for me.  You say Sixteen was a thug?  Why was he in detention then, what had he been detained for?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="468">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>He robbed the bakery.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="469">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Thank you Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="470">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Radebe who and how, who made the decision and how was the decision made to go and kidnap Ntabiseng Mfolo and Baseka and to go to the other house of Ntauleng?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="471">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>Terrence Mkwehli was in the local structures, and he informed us about the decision that was taken at the meeting.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="472">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>A meeting of what?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="473">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>That was the COSAS meeting, because we were all students.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="474">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes.   Ms Makhubele, do you have any questions arising out of questions that had been put by Members of the Panel?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="475">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Nothing Honourable Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="476">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MS MAKHUBELE</text>
		</line>
		<line number="477">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Nyawuza, any questions arising?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="478">
			<speaker>FURTHER CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, only one question.   Mr Radebe, on your answer, your answer to Adv Sandi&#039;s question as to what was Sixteen arrested for, you said for the robbery of a bakery, was he the only person arrested or was he arrested with other people?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="479">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>He was, I don&#039;t know the other people who were arrested with him, but we were detained, because we were comrades.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="480">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Was he also detained under the same Section as yourself?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="481">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>We were not in the same cell, but we were at the same prison, but he was detained for robbing the bakery.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="482">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>Wasn&#039;t he detained under Section 29 as yourself?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="483">
			<speaker>MR RADEBE</speaker>
			<text>No, I don&#039;t remember so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="484">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>No further questions, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="485">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR NYAWUZA</text>
		</line>
		<line number="486">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mapoma, any questions arising?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="487">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>None Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="488">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR MAPOMA</text>
		</line>
		<line number="489">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Mr Radebe, that concludes your testimony, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="490">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
		<line number="491">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Ms Makhubele, are you going to be calling any further witnesses?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="492">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>None Honourable Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="493">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Nyawuza, do you intend to call any witnesses?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="494">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA</speaker>
			<text>No, I am not going to call any witnesses, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="495">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mapoma, are you going to be calling any witnesses?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="496">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="497">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Do you want, I see it is after one o&#039;clock now, do you want to finish this matter now or do you want to address after lunch?  Do you want to make submissions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="498">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>I suggest we do so now Honourable Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="499">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, right.  Thank you Ms Makhubele, if you can make your submissions please.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="500">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE IN ARGUMENT</speaker>
			<text>Honourable Chair and Committee Members, I just want to highlight because it appears at the end of the day that this would have an impact on whether he has disclosed or not, but I just wish to point out some differences in the statement of Baseka and Ntabiseng.  When we look at the statement of Baseka, he says that he doesn&#039;t know what happened to Ntabiseng after he escaped, but on the same breath, it appears he was in a bakkie and Ntabiseng was also in a bakkie. ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="501">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But it was clearly put that there were two vehicles?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="502">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I am coming to that Honourable Chair.  In his statement he mentions that there were four cars and a truck and I would imagine that when he says a bakkie, he is referring to the truck.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="503">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>No, not necessarily.  If there were two, we don&#039;t know the type of the other one, we know the one was a flat back truck?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="504">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="505">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>My, yes, it could be.  It needn&#039;t be, but it could be.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="506">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, but unfortunately we don&#039;t have his testimony where one would have had an opportunity to clarify the issues like this, Honourable Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="507">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	If Ntabiseng says that she, after she was forced in a bakkie, she doesn&#039;t know what happened to this Baseka, but Baseka says that he last saw Ntabiseng, he doesn&#039;t know what happened to Ntabiseng after he escaped.  One would then imagine that at the place where he escaped, he was with Ntabiseng?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="508">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>No, it was from Mr Nyawuza, he put it that the two vehicles were leaving Chinatown, passed Chinatown and the one went ahead and the police came and the people escaped near Everton, where Baseka escaped and the other one got through to near Dube?  It wasn&#039;t the two vehicles at the same place, that was what was put by, although I know it is not evidence, but I mean what you are saying is wrong in accordance with what was put by Mr Nyawuza.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="509">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Honourable Chair, what I am saying, I have taken from the statement, from his written statement, not the version put by Mr Nyawuza, I am taking it from the statement that he says</text>
		</line>
		<line number="510" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I do not know what happened to Ntabiseng after I escaped&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="511">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>which would mean that until he escaped, he could see or was with Ntabiseng in one car.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="512">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Not necessarily, yes, it might be.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="513">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Might be, thank you Mr Chairman.  Another thing is the version which has been put to the applicant that at Baseka&#039;s house or home, people were assaulted, his brother, his father, but unfortunately like I said before, his version differs with the applicant&#039;s and there is no way where one can test the version, because it is not even in his written statement.  There is nothing in his written statement to suggest that any other person but himself, was assaulted at his place.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="514">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I know and understand and appreciate that it is not a criminal trial, but then this would at the end of the day impact on whether he has disclosed everything that happened on the day in question, because we do not even know from the Bundle whether he was charged with one assault or how many assaults Honourable Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="515">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	My submission is that the applicant has made a full disclosure and which in my opinion would be the only disputed requirement, and as such, that he should be granted amnesty.  Thank you Honourable Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="516">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Ms Makhubele.  Mr Nyawuza, do you wish to make any submissions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="517">
			<speaker>MR NYAWUZA IN ARGUMENT</speaker>
			<text>Only three lines.  Honourable Chair and Honourable Committee Members, our submission is that there hasn&#039;t been full disclosure, first in that a person who was arrested and served the same sentence with the applicant before this Committee, testified that, made a statement to the effect that the motor vehicle they were in, was going towards Soweto and that is disputed by the applicant.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="518">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	There has just been so many contradictions and a lot has not been said by him.  The evidence is on record.  We submit that he should not be given amnesty.  That is all that I can say on behalf of the victims.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="519">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Nyawuza.  Mr Mapoma, do you wish to make any submissions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="520">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA IN ARGUMENT</speaker>
			<text>Just a few Chairperson.  On the question, on the issue which is quite disturbing Chairperson, that one of full disclosure.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="521">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	The applicant gives an impression that he did not participate in the acts of assault, the smashing of the windows and the explanation that he has given as to why he did not participate, is that he did not want his emotions to overrun him.  That gives an impression Chairperson, that those who did those things, were just overrun by emotions, otherwise that was not the plan.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="522">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	That infers that he disassociates himself, he dissociates himself with those assaults as it is.  One other thing, that is interestingly noteworthy in his evidence is that of all the persons who were forming that group, the actual persons who identified themselves as the actual perpetrators are Terrence and Struggle.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="523">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Those two, they are the only two whom he has mentioned, and they are not alive. </text>
		</line>
		<line number="524">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>They are the only two that are dead now, as well, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="525">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Pardon Chairperson?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="526">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I say they are deceased now?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="527">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.   Chairperson, it is my submission that that counts heavily against him as a credible person, as a credible witness to give, to make full disclosure before the Committee.  That is all Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="528">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Do you have any reply Ms Makhubele?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="529">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>None Honourable Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="530">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you very much.  We will hand down a written decision in this matter, as is our policy.  Accordingly we reserve our decision, I would like to thank the legal representatives, Ms Makhubele for your assistance, Mr Nyawuza for yours, and Mr Mapoma for yours.  Thank you.  We will now take the lunch adjournment and then you can let us know when you are ready to - have you got another matter to go on with today?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="531">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Yes Chairperson, the matter I would be calling after lunch is that of Buhali.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="532">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Buhali and Dube?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="533">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="534">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  We will now take the lunch adjournment, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="535">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>