<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY HEARINGS</type>
	<startdate>2000-06-30</startdate>
	<location>JOHANNESBURG</location>
	<day>5</day>
	<names>PATRICK NDLELA</names>
	<case>AM7043/..</case>
						<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=54298&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/2000/200630jh.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="1157">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker>PATRICK NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Ms Makhubele.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Ndlela, how old are you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;ll be 31 years old on the 9th of October.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Where do you reside?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>In Daveyton.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>You are presently incarcerated at Leeukop Maximum Prison?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>You are before this Commission to apply for amnesty in respect of an incident where two police officer, Mr Thabo and Mr Zweli, were injured and also Mr Kotelo was killed on the 1st of August 1993?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>This incident you were convicted of and it&#039;s the sentence thereof you are serving at Leeukop Prison?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>The effective period of sentence is 34 years.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Before we come to the incident, can you tell the Committee if at that period 1993 and at Daveyton you were - whether you were a member of any political organisation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I was a member.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Which organisation and what was your position?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I was a member of the ANC Youth League.  I was an additional member.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Prior ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Could you clear that up what he means by additional member?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>And additional member is a person who occupied any position in the event of a shortage.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>A shortage in what?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Such as the Chairperson, or the Secretary.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Oh you mean in the Executive Committee of the ANC Youth League?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Ms Makhubele.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>How long ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry just before you proceed, sorry to interrupt Ms Makhubele.  You&#039;re just applying for the incident that took place on the 1st of August, namely the incident involving the shooting, the injury of Messrs Thabo and Zweli and the killing of Mr Kotelo, is that right?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m just looking - yes.  So you&#039;re not going to be concerned at all with - you weren&#039;t involved in that - you weren&#039;t part of that 500 or 600 in the group who attacked the IFP camp?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No, I was not part of that, I was at Thema.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, thank you.  Sorry Ms Makhubele, if you could just continue.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Maybe a further clearing up on what incidents, Mr Ndlela, did you complete the application form yourself, that&#039;s form 1, page 58 of the bundle?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No, one of my comrades was helping me out at Modderbee Prison.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Do you know if this comrade understood the questions which he - is it a he or a she?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>It&#039;s a he.  You see we don&#039;t have mixed sexes in the prison.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Because - so do you know if this person understood the questions in that he was supposed to help you fill in the form?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he understood the questions but I cannot say how he was writing, I cannot.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You see it says here</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;We were fighting against gangsters and criminals at the locations&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, gangsters and PASO.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes but I mean - all right.  And then you mention the person being killed as being Erasmus Rasta Mawele in the application form, page 60.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Okay, carry on.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>On this clearing up, this Erasmus Rasta Mawele you referred to on page 60 of the bundle and also Makana Moloi, also page 60 and Skeer also on page 60, have these people been killed or can you just tell us what they are in relation to your involvement in any incident?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Rasta Mawele died.  Makana Moloi and Skeer Zwane are my comrades, they are still alive, but yes, they were part of the incident where Rasta Mawele was killed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>But Rasta Mawele was not killed by you, you&#039;re not applying for amnesty for his death?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I did not kill him.  He was killed by PASO members.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  How long had you been a member of the ANC Youth League before 1 August 93?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I was a member of ANC Youth League from 1986.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>You are not, or were not a member of MK?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No, I&#039;ve never been outside the country, I&#039;ve always been here.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Are you sure you were a member of the ANC Youth League in 1996?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I&#039;m sure.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>But wasn&#039;t that a banned organisation at the time?  Are you not talking about some other organisation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it was banned but we were operating under COSAS, but yes, it was the Youth League.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>You were a member of COSAS in 1986, are you saying that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, because I was still at school.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  How far did you go at school?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="61">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Standard 6.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="62">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>When did you leave school?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="63">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>In 1987.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="64">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>The period you&#039;re referring to as having been a member of ANC Youth League, or COSAS, you were still at primary school.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="65">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I was at high school.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="66">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>And furthermore, Mr Ndlela, if you can just clarify.  Your level of understanding of politics, how would you describe it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="67">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I understand politics, but yes it&#039;s true, there are some things that I do not understand.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="68">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Going back to 1993 at Tokoza, what was the situation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="69">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Are you talking about Tokoza?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="70">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m sorry, I don&#039;t know why I think of Tokoza.  At Daveyton, how would you describe it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="71">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>The situation was bad, people were being killed.  You wouldn&#039;t move about alone, you had to be in groups to move around.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="72">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Who was fighting who?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="73">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>PASO was fighting against COSAS and it was this fight again between the IFP and the ANC.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="74">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>And you as the Youth League, where were you in all this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="75">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>We were affected because PASO was killing our students.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="76">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Why do you refer to them as gangsters?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="77" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;We were fighting gangsters, which called themselves PASO&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="78">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Was PASO not, were they not students but affiliated to the philosophy of the PAC?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="79">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, some were students and some were not.   As far as I saw them, I perceived them to be gangsters.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="80">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Now the period 1993, when you were within the ANC, did you still regard them as gangsters?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="81">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, the students were PASO members, yes, those are affiliates to the PAC and there were others who were not students and all that they were doing was against what PASO was standing for.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="82">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, you may proceed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="83">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  You said you as ANC Youth League, what role did you play in this conflict?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="84">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>The ANC Youth League was patrolling the township and guarding the community.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="85">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Did you know or do you know your co-applicant Mr Mothibe?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="86">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="87">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>For how long have you known him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="88">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I knew him before he went to exile.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="89">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Can you tell the Committee specifically about the incident of the 1st of August 93 and the surrounding circumstances before the incident?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="90">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>The situation was quite bad.  People were being killed and there were meetings convened and attended to address the death of comrades.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="91">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Proceed please.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="92">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>We decided to do something.  We didn&#039;t want to die without doing anything about it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="93">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Can you tell us what led to that incident?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="94">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Meetings were held and Mr Kotelo&#039;s name was mentioned now and then and it was alleged that he was assisting these people with transport and in many other ways and there was also another one who was also involved.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="95">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>When you say he was assisting these people, are you referring to PASO members or supporters?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="96">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he was assisting PASO.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="97">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Were you present in this meeting where Mr Kotelo&#039;s name came forward?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="98">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="99">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Do you know the person who gave that information?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="100">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="101">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Who was it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="102">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Makana Moloi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="103">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Did this...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="104">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, I just wanted to find out what position Makana Moloi held in the community.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="105">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>He was in charge of the Martials and the SDUs.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="106">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Did this Makana Moloi say in that meeting where he got the information from?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="107">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he did indicate that they captured one person who gave them this information.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="108">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>But the person captured was not in the meeting, this was a report by Makana Moloi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="109">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="110">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>What decision was reached in that meeting about this issue?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="111">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>A decision was made to the effect that we had to do something, that is why a platoon was created to take care of the situation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="112">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>What do you mean by a platoon?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="113">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>A unit.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="114">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Who formed the unit?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="115">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>My comrade here next to me and other comrades including Fanie.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="116">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Who were the unit members?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="117">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I volunteered to be part of the unit.  Colin Mashego, Dingane Molefe and Fanie as well as my comrade here next to me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="118">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Can you clarify this, did he form the unit or was he part of the unit, your comrade next to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="119">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>He participated in the establishment of the unit as a Commander because himself, as well as Fanie and a few others, were repatriated exiles so we placed our trust in them and we trusted that they will make sure that we succeed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="120">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So the first applicant, Mr Mothibe, was he the Commander of the unit or did it have more than one Commander?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="121">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he was a Commander.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="122">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>When you say a Commander, we know that people who belonged to MK were all trained and considered themselves Commanders in that they had to take care of situations as and when they arose, but I want to know of that unit, who was the Commander?  Who was the single Commander of that unit or were there more than one Commander in that unit?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="123">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>There were two Commanders.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="124">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So the other one was Fanie?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="125">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="126">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>What were the instructions given to you by the Commander?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="127">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>When you say the Commander, you better start identifying which one, because he&#039;s just said there were two.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="128">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  Thank you Mr Chairperson.  Were these Commanders acting simultaneously or you would get instructions from one of them at different times?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="129">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>They worked in unison so that one would not issue an instruction without the knowledge of the other.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="130">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>In terms of giving instruction, who gave - who acted between Fanie and Mr Mothibe?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="131">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Mothibe, or should I say the person who was very close to the platoon was Fanie.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="132">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Ms Makhubele, let me get clarity on this.  Two incidents have been referred to, if we have regard to 9(c)(i) and (ii) and you look at page 62, the question asked is</text>
		</line>
		<line number="133" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;If so, state particulars of such order or approval at the date thereof and if known, the name and address of the persons who gave the approval&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="134">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>and then (ii) says:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="135" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Skeer Zwane gave the approval.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="136">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>That is the killing of the police, or shooting of the police rather, I beg your pardon.  What is the position here because now we&#039;ve got these Commanders Fanie and Mothibe?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="137">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I noticed the problem and the person here did not fill in the information as I wanted him to.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="138">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>How would the person filling in the application on your behalf know about Skeer Zwane?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="139">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>In some instances he would ask me which people among my comrades were close to me and I will tell him names and he will write down and I did not make sure that he was filling in  information in right columns.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="140">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  This Makana Moloi and Skeer which you mention here, are they the same people you indicated earlier on that they were actually your comrades who knew about the death of Erasmus Mawele?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="141">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes because Erasmus died when he was in their company.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="142">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  I had asked you who between Fanie and Mothibe gave instructions as to what is to be done about the Kotelo matter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="143">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Edward Mothibe instructed Fanie because he was not going to be available.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="144">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Did you personally get instructions from Mr Mothibe about what is to be done?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="145">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No, not me directly, he instructed Fanie.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="146">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>According to Fanie, what were the instructions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="147">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>The instructions were to the effect that seeing that Mothibe was not going to be available, Fanie will be in charge of the platoon and anything that he instructed had to be followed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="148">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Did he tell you what had to be done or what was supposed to be done?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="149">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he told us what should be done.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="150">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Before I come to that Mr Ndlela can you just clarify, are you saying that you never got actual instructions from Mr Mothibe?  That is, there has never been a situation where  you and the other platoon members, as you call them, or unit members talked to Mr Mothibe about what is to be done with Kotelo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="151">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>That was discussed in a meeting.  There were several of us.  That was at a general meeting where we were discussing the situation in the township and the people with whom we had to deal.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="152">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>After the unit was identified, was it not put aside and given instructions other than at the meeting?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="153">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, we received instructions from Fanie.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="154">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>But not from Mothibe?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="155">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No, he did not brief us.  The one person who briefed us was Fanie because he is the one who was going to accompany us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="156">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>So according to Fanie, what did Mothibe tell him to tell you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="157">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>He told us that Mothibe had provided him with firearms but he was not in a position to give us the firearms during the day, but we were going to get these in the evening on our way out to the mission and we are going to a place where we&#039;re going to meet two policemen and we had to look out for them and we did that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="158">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Why were you to look out for the two policemen and who are they?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="159">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>The police had to be monitored because they resided around Kotelo&#039;s house.  The one person whom I knew was a police person and resided next to Kotelo&#039;s was Lucky.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="160">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Why were you to look for them and what were you supposed to do with them or to them?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="161">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>We had to make sure that they do not interrupt us and we had to get them out of our way if that was necessary.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="162">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>If I may interpose, who told you about this policeman whom you knew who lived next to Lucky, who lived next to the Kotelo&#039;s?  Who told you that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="163">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Fanie said there are policeman next to Kotelo&#039;s household.  I knew this other one, Lucky.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="164">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Now when you spoke about the police, you already knew that there was Lucky who was living next to the Kotelo&#039;s, when Fanie said that to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="165">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I knew Lucky, we grew up together.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="166">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Ms Makhubele.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="167">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>What were you - you said you were supposed to make sure they don&#039;t disrupt you in your mission.  What was your mission?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="168">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Our mission was to eliminate Mr Kotelo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="169">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>What time did you go to carry out your instructions on that day?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="170">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>We arrived there at round about past eight in the evening, that is if I&#039;m not mistaken.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="171">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Arrived where?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="172">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>We went to Mojali Street at Skodipola and there were many people, it looked like there was a function going on and we realised that we couldn&#039;t take that route and we took a detour.  We went through Madela street and it was suggested that we should take a shortcut to the main road via Island and in the shortcut that we took, there was a shebeen.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="173">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>By the way, how many were you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="174">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>There were six of us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="175">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Who is the sixth person, because the unit comprised of five people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="176">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Put it the other way round because Mr Mothibe wouldn&#039;t have been present.  There would be four because the unit consisted of five.  He wasn&#039;t present.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="177">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, so who were the six that you were with?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="178">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>We were accompanied by two family comrades.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="179">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So it was yourself, Fanie, Colin, Fanie.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="180">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>It was myself, Fanie, Colin as well as Dingane and Maggie as well as Maripane.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="181">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, who was Maggie?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="182">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Maggie is the one who was turned State Witness.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="183">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Was she anybody&#039;s girlfriend?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="184">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>She was Edward&#039;s girlfriend.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="185">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Did you call the first applicant as Edward within the unit?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="186">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No, we called him Skutchu Stimela.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="187">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And who was Maripane?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="188">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Maripane is one other family comrade.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="189">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes but what do you mean family comrade?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="190">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>A female comrade.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="191">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Why did you take them along?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="192">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>There were two of them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="193">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, but we&#039;ve heard that there were four guns and now you&#039;re taking extra people, did they have firearms?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="194">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No they were not armed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="195">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>yes, but now the question is why did the unit, they weren&#039;t part of the unit, why did the unit  ...(indistinct - talking simultaneously)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="196">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>They were not part of the unit but they played a role seeing that we were on our mission.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="197">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>This is what I&#039;m asking you.  Why did you take them along?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="198">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>They were going to stage a front so that we are not suspected.  The police were patrolling at night and they would search us and they will tell the police that we are going to a night vigil or going for some choral practices.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="199">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Ms Makhubele.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="200">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chair.  So you were saying you got to near the shebeen when I interrupted you, can you proceed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="201">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that was at Madela street, next to Kotelo&#039;s house and as we were to walk through to the other side, we realised that Lucky was present.  He was very light in complexion, similar to that of the coloured people and we didn&#039;t know whether they were in possession of firearms or not and Fanie suggested that we should get inside and disarm them.  Indeed we went inside.  We called Lucky outside and we searched him and he was not in possession of a firearm and we also called Zweli who was in his company and we did not get any firearm from him and we then proceeded and along the way, one of the comrades said:  &quot;Look, we cannot just let these people go after frisking them&quot; and he said it might as well be that they gave their firearms to the shebeen owner.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="202">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Who said that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="203">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Fanie.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="204">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>When you saw Lucky, where was he, because you say you then entered the shebeen?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="205">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Actually it was a thoroughfare from the shebeen street to the other street so that&#039;s the route we took.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="206">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Was he in or outside the - or is the shebeen in an open area?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="207">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>It&#039;s an ordinary formed house in a built-up area but then there was this thoroughfare from one street to the other.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="208">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Was he in or outside the house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="209">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No, he was outside.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="210">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>But when you went to search him and Ernest, was he still outside or inside?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="211">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>We saw him as he was moving into the house.  We went inside and brought him back outside, searched him and found nothing.  We asked as to who was in his company,.  He pointed out that he was in the company of Zweli.  We brought him outside, frisked him and found nothing and then we proceeded to the other street and then along the way Fanie said:  &quot;Look, we should go back to those people because we don&#039;t know whether they gave the firearms to the shebeen owner or they left their firearms at home, so they should be shot in case they disrupt us.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="212">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Then you went back specifically to shoot them?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="213">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="214">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>What happened then?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="215">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>We went inside.  Fanie stood at the door and three of us went inside, that was myself, Dingane and Colin.  Dingane shot Mr Zweli, the one sitting over there and Colin shot Lucky.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="216">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Between the two - sorry Ms Makhubele, between the two, who is Zweli and who is Lucky?  Could you point them out to us because we don&#039;t know them, we just know there are two victims over there and we are informed they are police.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="217">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Zweli is the one who is present today and Lucky is not here today.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="218">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Who is Mr Zweli there?  Mr Zweli, could you just put your hand up please?  Thank you.  Okay.  Thank you.  Mr Zweli is sitting next to Mr Makondo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="219">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="220">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Do you remember how many times and on which part of their bodies they were shot?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="221">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I cannot say exactly on which part of the body they were shot, but five shots rang at the scene.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="222">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Did you do anything yourself?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="223">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I was standing at the dining room door waiting for anybody who would attempt to leave.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="224">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>With what sort of firearms were they shot, was it AK7&#039;s or hand guns?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="225">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Hand guns.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="226">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Were  there other patrons inside that house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="227">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Pardon?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="228">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Other shebeen, other people in the shebeen?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="229">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, but there were not many of them, there could have been three of them so that in all there were five of them including the victims.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="230">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Would this be a convenient time to take the tea adjournment, Ms Makhubele?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="231">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="232">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  We&#039;ll take a twenty minute tea adjournment, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="233">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="234">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>ON RESUMPTION</text>
		</line>
		<line number="235">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="236">
			<speaker>PATRICK NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>(s.u.o.)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="237">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Ms Makhubele.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="238">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>(Cont)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="239">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Ndlela why was it necessary for you to go back to shoot them when you had already ascertained they do not have firearms?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="240">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Is it perhaps - did you hear the question Mr Ndlela, or do you want Ms Makhubele - if you could just repeat your question Ms Makhubele.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="241">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Why was it necessary for your unit to go back and shoot the two police officers when you have already ascertained they do not have firearms?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="242">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>The instruction came from our Commander at the time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="243">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Fanie?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="244">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="245">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, then let&#039;s proceed to Kotelo&#039;s home, what happened there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="246">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>After leaving the shebeen we were just a short distance away from Kotelo&#039;s home and when we got there it was dark and there was nobody in sight and after some time a white car appeared and Fanie said:  &quot;Yes, what we have been waiting for is going to happen now&quot; and indeed we went and as Mr Kotelo was opening the gate, we came, held him and put him in the car and on the way Fanie said Kotelo should stop the car.  He took Mr Kotelo out, shot him and we then left him on the scene and drove to Johannesburg.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="247">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry.  Was Mr Kotelo alone when he was ....</text>
		</line>
		<line number="248">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No, he was with this lady and a child.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="249">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>The lady, you&#039;re referring to the wife who is before this Committee?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="250">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="251">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>And how old was this child?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="252">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I cannot say, but it was a small child.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="253">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>A toddler, a teenager?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="254">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>It was still a small baby.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="255">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And sorry, what happened with the wife and the child?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="256">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>They were left at the Kotelo premises.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="257">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did they also get out of the car when the deceased got out or were they forced out of the vehicle?  What are you saying?  You said that the vehicle arrived and Mr Kotelo got out, opened the gate and you went to him and dragged him into the car.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="258">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>They had already gotten out of the car, they were standing outside.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="259">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Ms Makhubele.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="260">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>After accosting Mr Kotelo, were you still with these two women?  So then you would be seven in the car.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="261">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, they were still there and there were seven of us now.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="262">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Just to ask one thing.  How long had you been waiting there before Mr Kotelo and his family arrived?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="263">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>It could have been just less than five minutes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="264">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, what sort of vehicle was it?  Was it - do you know what type, was it a sedan, was it a ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="265">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>It was a white Camry.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="266">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Who drove it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="267">
			<speaker>INTERPRETER</speaker>
			<text>The speaker&#039;s mike is not active.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="268">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Who drove it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="269">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Colin Mashego.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="270">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>And when the car stopped, who shot Mr Kotelo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="271">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Fanie.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="272">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>What did you do with him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="273">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>He left him on the scene and we drove away.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="274">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Where to?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="275">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>We went to Johannesburg.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="276">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>What happened to his car?  What happened to it?  Where did you leave it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="277">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>We left the vehicle in Johannesburg and Fanie said nothing should be taken from it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="278">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Johannesburg where?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="279">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I have difficulty in saying because I am not quite familiar with Johannesburg.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="280">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Did you take anything from his person, from Mr Kotelo&#039;s person?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="281">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No.  One person who got him out of the car was Fanie and nothing was taken off his person.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="282">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Did any one of you say anything to Mr Kotelo before he was shot?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="283">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I cannot say much because the one person who spoke to him was Fanie.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="284">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>What did he say to him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="285">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>He said he should get out of the car and he followed him and a fire, a shot was released.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="286">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Are you sure?  Is that all that was said to him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="287">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="288">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Do you know why he wasn&#039;t questioned about his activities relating to the assistance of PASO?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="289">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I cannot say.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="290">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Ms Makhubele.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="291">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chair.  Were you all arrested for this incident?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="292">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="293">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Including Fanie?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="294">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Fanie was not found, only three of us were arrested.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="295">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Do you know or did you know Fanie&#039;s full names?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="296">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No, I only knew the name Fanie.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="297">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Did you hear how the two police officers were injured in Court?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="298">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I heard that one of them is no longer able to walk and the other one was not badly injured, that is Lucky.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="299">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Did you see Mothibe again after you had left the motor vehicle in Jo&#039;burg?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="300">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No, I only saw him in the township.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="301">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Do you know if any of your unit members saw him that evening?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="302">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, some of us went to him, like Fanie for example.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="303">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Do you know the purpose thereof?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="304">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No, I cannot.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="305">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Did you gain anything, benefit, for this incident, say given an award, paid money, or in any other way benefited?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="306">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No, I did not benefit because we were not being paid.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="307">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>What can you say to this Committee as well as the victims before it, Mrs Kotelo, who has lost her husband as well as Mr Zweli sitting there?  You have heard in Court he cannot walk, you have seen him here, he is being carried around.  What can you say to them?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="308">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I would like to apologise and if I had powers, I would do something and my sincere apologies to Mrs Kotelo and Zweli.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="309">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Evidence-in-chief.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="310">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MS MAKHUBELE</text>
		</line>
		<line number="311">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Ms Makhubele.  Mr Makondo do you have any questions you&#039;d like to put to Mr Ndlela?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="312">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson, I do.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="313">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Ndlela, you said that you lived or you grew up in Daveyton, is it correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="314">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="315">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>And you said you knew Lucky?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="316">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, we grew up together.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="317">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>And you said you also knew that Lucky was residing not far from the Kotelo&#039;s house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="318">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="319">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>I take it therefore that when your Commanders talk of the two policemen who are residing next to the Kotelos you only knew of one and you were sure there was no one else.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="320">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I only knew Lucky.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="321">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>I take it therefore that when the second person was shot, you knew that if he&#039;s a policeman at all, he does not reside around the Kotelo&#039;s house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="322">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Zweli resided at Lucky&#039;s household.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="323">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>And where you found them at the shebeen, according to my instructions it was at Lucky&#039;s house, what do you say about that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="324">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No, Lucky resided at Mojali and we found them at Madela Street.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="325">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>When you went back to shoot these people, after you had satisfied yourself that they don&#039;t have firearms, in what way were you going to achieve your aim of them not be obstacles?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="326">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Unfortunately I cannot, I&#039;m not in the position to answer that because we followed an instruction form our Commander at the time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="327">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>You said you were never a member of the MK, correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="328">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="329">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Therefore when you talk of the Commander, the person who was in charge, you are not talking in terms of military discipline, because you were never a member of that department.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="330">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="331">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>You also said that you were a member of COSAS when you were at High School.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="332">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="333">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>And later became a member of the ANC Youth League.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="334">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="335">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>I take it therefore you knew that both COSAS and PASO had one common enemy, the then regime of the apartheid.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="336">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct, but some things led into - some things led to them being in loggerheads.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="337">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Therefore you knew that if any PASO member or COSAS member was to appear in Court charged with political activity was against your common enemy, am I correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="338">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Not necessarily.  I mean what if you had a case involving a matter where a member of PASO killed a member of COSAS and now he&#039;s been charged with the murder of a COSAS member?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="339">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Correct,  Chairperson, but I was talking not in a criminal term, but in terms of political, if one is accused of a political activity or a political action, not a criminal act.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="340">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Perhaps you can just rephrase it, home it in, because it was a little bit general the way it was put.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="341">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson.  You therefore knew that if any member of either COSAS or PASO is charged with a political offence, it was against your common enemy, of both you COSAS and PASO?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="342">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>You see that is a different matter altogether in relation to what we were fighting for.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="343">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Do you know any case, a court case whereby Mr Kotelo represented a PASO person?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="344">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No unfortunately I didn&#039;t know that.  That only was mentioned at the meeting by other comrades.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="345">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>As a resident of Daveyton, did you know of any other activity where Mr Kotelo was seen associating himself with PASO?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="346">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No I did not know that, I only heard about that at the meeting.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="347">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Do you know of any incident where perhaps Dr Skosana was seen associating himself with PASO?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="348">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I had not seen him to date, I only know his name.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="349">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>How did you know your co-applicant prior to him going to exile?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="350">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>We were involved in the struggle together.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="351">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>You said that the assistance amongst others that Mr Kotelo did according to your information was to help PASO with transport, am I correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="352">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, financially as well.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="353">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Was this information, did you get this information from one meeting where you co-applicant was?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="354">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, but this had been raised in three or several meetings prior to that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="355">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Can I just come in here?  When you say he was providing them with transport as well, do you mean to say that he was personally transporting them with his vehicle?  Can you explain that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="356">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No, I did not see him transporting the people using his vehicle, but the information that I got was that he was helping them in whatever way they wanted.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="357">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson.  And do you remember in which of the meetings that you held - do you remember in which meeting was it decided that Mr Kotelo, or the alleged Dr Skosana, should be eliminated?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="358">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I still recall.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="359">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Which one is that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="360">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>It was a meeting that was held at Davey Secondary School.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="361">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Can you perhaps remember the time period, even if not the exact date?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="362">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I cannot recall the time, but it was in the evening, early in 1993.  It was before May.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="363">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Do you remember after how long did you execute that plan?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="364">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>It was - I am ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="365">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I didn&#039;t get the answer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="366">
			<speaker>INTERPRETER</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I&#039;m trying to - a month had lapsed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="367">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>You said that you volunteered as a member of the unit.  Who else volunteered?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="368">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Colin, Colin also volunteered, Dingane also, Fanie as well as Stimela.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="369">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Are you therefore meaning  that as members you were not selected, you actually volunteered?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="370">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, we were not selected, we volunteered because we were very much concerned about the situation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="371">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>You were here and it was interpreted to you what your co-applicant was saying, am I correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="372">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I heard, but not all of it because he is speaking Sotho.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="373">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Wasn&#039;t that interpreted to you in Zulu?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="374">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No, only English and Sotho.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="375">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>He said ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="376">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>May I just interpose?  May we request the interpreters to interpret in Sotho as well for Mr Mothibe to be able to follow what Mr Ndlela is saying?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="377">
			<speaker>INTERPRETER</speaker>
			<text>That is certainly in place, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="378">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Ndlela, Mr Mothibe said he was given the  task to form the unit and he picked the members of the unit, contrary to what you&#039;re saying.  What do you say about that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="379">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I would not dispute that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="380">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Do you agree with me that volunteering is different from when one is picked or selected?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="381">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, I just want to object here.  I don&#039;t recall a word picked being used.  According to my recollection, he formed a unit comprising of  ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="382">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I can&#039;t recall myself the exact precise words that were used.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="383">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>So if he says he formed a unit comprising of the manner in which it was formed, whether the people volunteered, they were selected, they were picked, it was not put before this Committee.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="384">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, my recollection is that he used the word formed, he formed a unit, but how he went - as to how exactly he went about establishing that unit, was not canvassed with him, whether these people, he selected them himself, or they volunteered, that was not specifically canvassed with him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="385">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>On that basis Chairperson I&#039;ll withdraw that question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="386">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="387">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>But Mr Ndlela, your co-applicant said it was his initiative to form the unit, relative to the volunteering that they&#039;re talking about.  What do you say about that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="388">
			<speaker>INTERPRETER</speaker>
			<text>May the question please be repeated?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="389">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mothibe said it was his initiative to form the unit contrary to you saying members volunteered, what do you say about that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="390">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No, that is not in contrast with what I am saying because I volunteered to participate in the unit.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="391">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I think Mr Makondo, earlier you were questioning him about not being a member of the military and not being subject to the command because he wasn&#039;t a member of the MK.  Bearing that in mind, I think any participation by him in a unit would certainly to an extent involve an element of volunteering because it wasn&#039;t the army.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="392">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson.  Mr Mothibe, your co-applicant, also said that he was the Commander and you&#039;re saying there were two Commanders acting in unison and you also said that Fanie was actually the person who was close to the unit, now what is your response to him saying he was the Commander of the unit?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="393">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I would not dispute that because like I was saying, they  worked in unison.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="394">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>I want to come to your instructions prior to going to the Kotelo&#039;s house.  Was it your instructions to abduct him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="395">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>The instruction was that we should play safe.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="396">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Was it your instructions to kill him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="397">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that was an instruction.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="398">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Was it your instructions to shoot the police?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="399">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that was known, it was known that there were going to be police around Kotelo&#039;s or in the neighbourhood.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="400">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Since you knew Lucky, do you know if Lucky was already - had you seen Lucky associating with Mr Kotelo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="401">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No, I had not seen him speak to Mr Kotelo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="402">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Do you know of any incident where Lucky defended Mr Kotelo&#039;s position?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="403">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="404">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>How did you come to the conclusion that at that time he would do that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="405">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>I think in all fairness ...(indistinct - speaking simultaneously) In all fairness the tenor of the evidence was that if they attack Kotelo, because they were in the vicinity, they would hear probably a gunshot or so, not necessarily that they were cohorting in some way with Mr Kotelo, they were just living in the vicinity, I think that&#039;s the tenor of the evidence thus far, in fairness to the witness.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="406">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, the witness, the surrounding of the place where Kotelo was living, the witness knew Lucky, the police, and that is the reason why I asked those reasons, personally to get information from him, ...(indistinct) than the instructions.  If I could proceed.  You said that you had these two females who were playing front, am I correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="407">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="408">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>And that was not part of the planning, am I correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="409">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>It was part of the planning because the Commander is the one who brought these people along.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="410">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, when you say the Commander, I&#039;d prefer it if you could use Fanie or Mothibe.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="411">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m referring to Fanie because he&#039;s the one who was present at the time, in charge of the unit.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="412">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>What role did they play that day, these two females?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="413">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Their role was that if we happen to come across the police, we would create a story that we were going to a choral practice, or to a vigil, night vigil, because there were people patrolling the area at the time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="414">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Did they know you were on the way to attack Mr Kotelo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="415">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No, they didn&#039;t know, they were not told.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="416">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chair.  You said in your evidence that you got Mr Kotelo at the gate and contrary to my instructions, you got him inside the premises in the front door, what do you say about that?  Back door, sorry.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="417">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No, we found him at the gate because the vehicle was still in the street.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="418">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>As I put it to your co-applicant, my instructions are that there were items taken from his person, a bundle of keys, his leather jacket, his wallet and his watch, what do you say about that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="419">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I did not see any leather jacket.  The keys, yes we took them because these were going to be used to start the vehicle.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="420">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry Mr Makondo.  What ultimately happened with the keys?  Were they left in the car when it was abandoned in Jo&#039;burg, or were they taken?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="421">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>The keys were left in the vehicle in Johannesburg.  We locked the keys inside because we didn&#039;t have to take anything from the vehicle.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="422">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Before you proceed, just for information, these items you&#039;ve just mentioned, were they recovered?  What happened?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="423">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson I&#039;m informed that the watch and the wallet were never recovered, only the leather jacket was mentioned in Court, that it was sold.  I think one of the co-accused.  Thank you Chair.  So I&#039;m saying according to my instructions you went outside, you left from the premises - you left without him from the premises and you came back for him because you said you could not start the car, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="424">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No that is not correct.  We started the vehicle with ease because it didn&#039;t have an immobiliser</text>
		</line>
		<line number="425">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Do you know who started it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="426">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Colin did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="427">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Also it is said that when you came for the second time, Mr Kotelo said he did not resist to go and start the car for you, only he pleaded for his life, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="428">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No, we didn&#039;t come back for the second time, we only came once and left.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="429">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>When you, according to your version, when you abducted Mr Kotelo, when you went for him, you said his wife and child were in the house, where was he?  In the premises, where was he?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="430">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Not in the house.  They had got out of the vehicle and they were getting into the yard and Mr Kotelo was opening the gate to get the car into the yard.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="431">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>If I may interpose just there.  When he opened the gate, was the car switched off, that the is the engine, or was it still idling?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="432">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>It was switched off because apparently the gate, the keys to the gate were in the same bunch of keys, bundle of keys, as that of the vehicle.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="433">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chair.  And you said you don&#039;t know where, which area of Daveyton was the deceased dumped, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="434">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I know very well because I was there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="435">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Where was it dumped?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="436">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Between Mandela and Emapupene squatter camp.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="437">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, Mr Ndlela, the place where the deceased&#039;s body was left, was it a built-up place, was it left on the street?  Was the body out of sight from the road?  If you could just describe the area where the body was, or where Mr Kotelo was ...(indistinct - speaking simultaneously)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="438">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>It&#039;s  an area that is surrounded by shacks, the Mandela squatter camp and the Emapupene squatter camps, it&#039;s just on the side of the road.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="439">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Is it also correct to say that ...(indistinct - mike turned off)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="440">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>This, I&#039;m afraid I might forget this question.  This idea of kidnapping or taking Mr Kotelo along with, had it been mentioned before?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="441">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it was mentioned.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="442">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Where was that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="443">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>At the last meeting, the last briefing where we were to receive firearms, but at a later stage.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="444">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Was any reason given for the kidnapping?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="445">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, a reason was furnished.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="446">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>What reason was given?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="447">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>To derail any investigation or to cover all tracks.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="448">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Thank you Mr Makondo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="449">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>You said when you left the car where you dumped it, the place that you don&#039;t remember, you said Lucky gave the instruction that nothing must be taken from the car.  Do you know why did he give that instruction?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="450">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Fanie.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="451">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Fanie.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="452">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="453">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Why did he give such an instruction?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="454">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>It is because we didn&#039;t go there for a criminal robbery, we wanted to carry out our mission as we have planned.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="455">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Before he could say this, was there anyone who attempted to take something from the car perhaps?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="456">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Nobody attempted to take anything because Fanie indicated this clearly quite early on.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="457">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>When did he indicate this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="458">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Whilst we were still in the vehicle.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="459">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>In Court during your trial, it was said that you co-applicant is the one who was driving.  Where did the Court get such an information?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="460">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>That was a blue lie.  That was a statement that was made by the other one in our company, the one who ultimately became State Witness.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="461">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Can you say the name of that person for the record?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="462">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Meitjie.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="463">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>What information did you pick in Court which you did not know?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="464">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>There is no information that I came across that I didn&#039;t know.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="465">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Do you know why you had to wait for Mr Kotelo to come back from his house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="466">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I knew.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="467">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>When did you know that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="468">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I knew this during our last meeting.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="469">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Are you talking of the meeting of a month before the execution of the act?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="470">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No.  The last briefing session as a unit.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="471">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Do you remember when was that before the execution of the mission?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="472">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>It was around 11 in the morning.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="473">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Who came with that information?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="474">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Fanie.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="475">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>What information was that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="476">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>The information was to the effect that Mr Kotelo would come back in the evening and that should be the time when we should carry out the mission.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="477">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Would I be right to say when he said evening, he did not specify time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="478">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, no mention was made of the time because it was not know when exactly - at what time exactly he was coming back.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="479">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>The issue of going to Pretoria, did you know about it before you heard it in Court?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="480">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I heard about this Pretoria issue during the platoon session.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="481">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>So you heard it from Fanie also?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="482">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="483">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Ndlela, Mrs Kotelo when she gives evidence, she&#039;s going to say that the car, yes, was left outside, but she and her late husband and the child, they were already in the yard when you confronted them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="484">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No, that is not correct.  Mr Kotelo was opening the vehicle, it was at night, he could not have left the vehicle in the street and get into his homestead.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="485">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>She&#039;s also going to say that the vehicle was left outside because it was not parked in the yard, it was supposed to be parked three houses away from Kotelo&#039;s house.  Any comment?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="486">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No, the vehicle was on the pavement in front of his yard.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="487">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>She&#039;s also going to testify to the effect that it was after three when they got an urgent call to go to Pretoria, so they did not know of going to Pretoria in the morning, what do you say about that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="488">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No, I don&#039;t know anything about that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="489">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson, that will be all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="490">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR MAKONDO</text>
		</line>
		<line number="491">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Makondo.  Mr Mapoma, do you have any questions you&#039;d like to put to the applicant?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="492">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson, I do.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="493">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Ndlela, did you know Mr Kotelo prior to the day of the incident?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="494">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="495">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>How far is - where do you reside in - where&#039;s your home in Meadowlands?  I mean in Daveyton?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="496">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>My home is at Keswa, but my aunt stays at Skodi, at Mandela.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="497">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Where did you reside?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="498">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>At Keswa.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="499">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>What is Keswa?  Is it a street or a section or what?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="500">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>It&#039;s a street in Vergenoeg.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="501">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Is that in Daveyton?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="502">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="503">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>And how far is that from Mr Kotelo&#039;s place?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="504">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>It&#039;s very far.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="505">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>How did you know Lucky when it is that far, because I understand Lucky stays nearby Mr Kotelo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="506">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.  I knew him because I used to stay at my aunt&#039;s place at Skodi, that&#039;s where I got to know Lucky.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="507">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>And how far is that from Mr Kotelo&#039;s place, I mean - ja, Skodi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="508">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>It&#039;s not very far.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="509">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>And how far is that, that is Madela and Skodi from Lucky&#039;s home?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="510">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Madela Street runs through towards Mr Kotelo&#039;s house and then ...(indistinct) runs through to the squatter camp, Mandela squatter camp.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="511">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mapoma if I may interpose here.  When you say Madela runs through Kotelo&#039;s house, what do you mean?  Is it the same street as where Mr Kotelo lives?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="512">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Madela and Tjali run in confluence towards ...(indistinct)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="513">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson.  Did you know Lucky&#039;s home?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="514">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="515">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Now, which one is nearer to each other between Lucky&#039;s home and Madela, your aunt and Mr Kotelo&#039;s home?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="516">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Lucky&#039;s home is the one nearest to Kotelo&#039;s home.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="517">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>And you say you knew Lucky because you grew up with him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="518">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, we grew up together at Skodi because I used to stay at Skodi at my aunt&#039;s place at Madela.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="519">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  Now I take it that the PAC was in existence in Daveyton, am I correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="520">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="521">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>And it had it&#039;s leaders operating in that area whom you knew of?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="522">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>The ones that I know of are not elderly, they are our age, it&#039;s Skodi and Modi who resided at Ngcoba Street and Berera who resided at Tuatua East.  There were several of them that I knew from the PAC.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="523">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, now during the meeting that you had about the conflict between PASO and COSAS, is there any member of the PAC who was identified as problematic, who had to be dealt with?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="524">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, within the youth, but he was evasive, he was always on the run, we couldn&#039;t get hold of him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="525">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Who is that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="526">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What was his name?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="527">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Berera is the name.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="528">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry I didn&#039;t hear that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="529">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Berera.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="530">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>And then the other person was Mr Kotelo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="531">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I heard that he was assisting them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="532">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>And is there someone else from the PAC?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="533">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, the other one about whom I heard was Mr Skosana.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="534">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, Mr Mapoma, was there ever a decision taken that Berera should be killed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="535">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, the Bereras were also people who were wanted, but they were always on the run.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="536">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Did you try to get hold of them and kill them, is that what you are saying?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="537">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>We used to go out looking for them, but we were not able to get hold of them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="538">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>When you say we, who are you referring to, your unit, platoon, or are you referring to the ANC Youth League?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="539">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m referring to the ANC Youth League before the formation of the platoon.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="540">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>You may proceed Mr Mapoma.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="541">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson.  Now was it alleged that Mr Kotelo was also a PAC member at all?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="542">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No, it was not alleged but he&#039;s one person who was assisting the PAC people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="543">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>And you will agree with me that it will be very strange for a card carrying member of the ANC to assist PASO in a conflict between PASO and COSAS, that would be very strange, is it not so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="544">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>If that is the case, I&#039;m hearing that for the first time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="545">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>You are not answering the question.  You are not answering my questions.  My question is, do you agree with me or not that it would be very strange for a card carrying member of the ANC to assist PASO in a conflict between PASO and COSAS?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="546">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that would be very strange.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="547">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>And I put it to you that Mr Kotelo was a card carrying member of the ANC.  Do you dispute that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="548">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I cannot dispute that and I would not accept it, because I do not know.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="549">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>I will make you know.  Can I have that card please?  Chairperson, for the record I do have a membership card of the ANC which I would like to hand in to the Committee.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="550">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Perhaps if you could hand it in via Ms Makhubele, so that she can show it to her clients.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="551">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="552">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Let us look at it and then you can ...(indistinct - mike not on)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="553">
			<speaker>INTERPRETER</speaker>
			<text>The speaker&#039;s mike.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="554">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I don&#039;t know whether it will be at this stage because both applicants want to comment about the card.  I don&#039;t know what the position will be because it has been introduced now after the closure of Mothibe&#039;s application, whether he will be afforded an opportunity to comment.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="555">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I think so, we&#039;re not in a trial here, but perhaps seeing Mr Ndlela&#039;s in the box and being questioned about the card, he can comment now on it and we&#039;ll give Mr Mothibe if he wants, an opportunity when Mr Ndlela&#039;s finished his testimony.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="556">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Thanks Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="557">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>I have no objection Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="558">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, you&#039;ve seen the card Mr Ndlela.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="559">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I have.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="560">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mapoma.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="561">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>What is your comment to that card?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="562">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I would like to know as to when this card was obtained.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="563">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Yours is to answer questions Sir.  You said ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="564">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I think just for the record, unless I missed it, there doesn&#039;t appear to be a date or year on the card.  Perhaps just to describe it, it&#039;s an ANC membership card, carrying the colours and logo of the ANC, it has the name of the deceased in it, it has a number and it is signed by some person and it&#039;s got the birthday of the deceased 1954, I&#039;ve forgotten the exact date and then it&#039;s got on the other page the months of the year contained in a type of calendar form in little squares that has been printed as part of the card but nothing is marked on that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="565">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>And it also contains Chairperson, Daveyton Branch, region PWV and membership fee R12-00.  The card number Chairperson is 605411.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="566">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="567">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>I may as well, Chairperson, point out that there is no space provided for a date of issue of the membership card.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="568">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  I was just wondering and it&#039;s not evidence now, but looking - what would be the purpose of the months that are set out on the second page?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="569">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>I wouldn&#039;t know Chairperson but there is just a heading Membership Levies.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="570">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Membership Levies, oh so there might, if there were to be a monthly levy to indicate a receipt or something like that.  Yes, Mr Mapoma.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="571">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Ndlela, I thought that you had a comment to make on the card.  I&#039;m giving you that opportunity to comment on the card.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="572">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I would say if the card is issued, it is issued with an issue date and expiry date and it is indicated on the card and it is written on the card every month when you pay your membership fee, but this one I find very strange because it does not indicate when it was issued and the date of registration and it should have an expiry date as well, but I do not see all of those things.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="573">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>But other than that, is it an ANC card?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="574">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, the colours, yes, are ANC colours, but the contents really do not convince me that this person was a member of the ANC.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="575">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>If you look at the dates on the right-hand side of the card, if they were all for instance marked up to December, wouldn&#039;t that be the expiry date?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="576">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>That could be so, but they had to include the date on which the card was issued and the date on which the card was registered or the member was registered.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="577">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>As at this date, that is the 1st October 1993,</text>
		</line>
		<line number="578">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>August.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="579">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>August, thank you Chairperson.  1st August 1993, you were a member of the ANC Youth League, would I be correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="580">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="581">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Were you carrying similar cards?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="582">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I have one.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="583">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>The same as ANC?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="584">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>ANC Youth League.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="585">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>What would be yours marked, because to identify that you belonged to the Youth League?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="586">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>It had my membership number and the date on which I registered and the date of issue and the expiry date, because it expires every year and it had to be renewed annually as a member.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="587">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Wouldn&#039;t it have the calendar on the right-hand side?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="588">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, the calendar was part of it so that that column is ticked every month once you have paid your monthly membership fee.  Sometimes you would pay in advance for the whole year and those columns would be filled for the whole year.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="589">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>What I&#039;m saying is that would your card for instance say you joined the ANC on X date and the card would expire on X date, Y date, rather?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="590">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="591">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Over and above the calendar on the right-hand side?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="592">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="593">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>And what would be that if ...(indistinct) that somebody would immediately notice that you are actually not a member of, if we may call it the adult ANC membership, but you belong to the Youth League of the ANC, what would - would there be any indication of that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="594">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I had my branch number which would be stated on the card, but here I cannot see the branch number.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="595">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The - I think what Judge Motata&#039;s asking you, was your card an ANCYL card as opposed to an ANC card?  Did it say ANC Youth League, or did it say, was it a card like that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="596">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>It was a card written ANC, it was not written Youth League.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="597">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>...(indistinct)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="598">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, just like that one, but there were certain details which are not applicable or which are not in this card.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="599">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>You had an opportunity to see the signature oft he secretary, do you recognise that signature?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="600">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>If you want to look at it again, you can.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="601">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I would appreciate that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="602">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Do you recognise that signature?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="603">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I can see the signature.  There&#039;s no invoice number but no, I don&#039;t know this signature.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="604">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m asking you one simple question.  I&#039;m not here to cross-examine you, I just want clarification.  Do you only recognise that signature?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="605">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No, I don&#039;t know it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="606">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Did you know the secretary of the ANC in Daveyton?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="607">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t know whether the same person is still secretary in Daveyton.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="608">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Ndlela, I think we are all agreed that we speak, as I said earlier, as at the 1st August, 1993, we are speaking of 1993.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="609">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="610">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>I know that you are incarcerated, so you wouldn&#039;t know precisely what happens outside.  Okay?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="611">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="612">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  I say the secretary, I don&#039;t know whether it is a 1993 card or what, but did you know the secretary then?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="613">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="614">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Who was it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="615">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Oupa.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="616">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, but there&#039;s a signature there that contains a surname, it wouldn&#039;t sign Oupa.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="617">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No, that&#039;s not the surname of the person that I know as Oupa.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="618">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>It&#039;s very simple.  I said the surname there, the signature which contains the surname, because firstly up to now you haven&#039;t told me who Oupa was, you simply told me Oupa.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="619">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The question is easy.  Do you - You either know it or you don&#039;t, or you know it partially.  Do you know who the secretary of the ANC in the Daveyton branch was during 1993?  That&#039;s the question.  You&#039;ve said Oupa, but now the question is, do you know what his real name was?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="620">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Oupa is the real name.  He was secretary of the Youth League but I didn&#039;t know the surname of the ANC at the high level.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="621">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, thank you.  Mr Mapoma.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="622">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>That suffices.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="623">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="624">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, Mr Mapoma, just on this issue.  I don&#039;t know, maybe you&#039;ll be asking him a question on something else.  Before this membership card was produced, I understood you to say that you won&#039;t dispute that the deceased was a member of the ANC because you know nothing about that, is that still the position?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="625">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I still maintain, but there are certain things that throw some doubt on the card.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="626">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Are you saying you still maintain that you don&#039;t dispute that the deceased was ANC?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="627">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I cannot dispute that and I cannot accept it at the same time because I&#039;m very sceptical about certain things in the card.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="628">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Thank you Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="629">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson.  Were you ever a member of the ANC?  A card carrying member of the ANC?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="630">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I was a card carrying member of the ANC Youth League.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="631">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Is it your evidence that the membership card of the ANC Youth League was like this card, which has  been, which is ...(indistinct- speaking simultaneously)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="632">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it was similar to this one and on registering it is ticked on the right where you have the month column and it is indicated that you registered on this day and you paid so much.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="633">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>What was the registration fee, or membership fee for the ANC?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="634">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>It was R10,00.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="635">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>For the Youth League or the ANC itself?  You were - you said you were a member of the ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="636">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m referring to the Youth League.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="637">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>So the other members who were not members of the Youth League.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="638">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>The amount was not the same.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="639">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Mapoma.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="640">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson.  Mr Ndlela on this one, I&#039;m not trying to be a witness but I would like a comment.  I thought the ANC Youth League membership card is a red card outside with an ANC Youth League Logo and not like that one, completely different from that one.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="641">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I cannot dispute that, maybe those are recent ones.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="642">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>No, no, when the ANC Youth League was launched in South African, after the South African Youth Congress was disbanded and ANC Youth League came into being, it had a ready card with an ANC Youth League logo outside on the outside cover of it, that&#039;s how I understood it.  Dispute it if you dispute it, then I&#039;ll leave it there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="643">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I cannot dispute that but I have never carried such a card.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="644">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Is it your evidence that you never carried an ANC Youth League Membership Card which is red?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="645">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I&#039;ve never carried a red one, I&#039;ve always carried the one similar to the one exhibited here.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="646">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, let us leave it there.  Now during that day, did you ever meet Mr Mothibe, the day of the 1st August 1993?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="647">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="648">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Now when the briefing was made, a final briefing before you went to, for the operation, you never met with him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="649">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>We were together in the morning before he left the firearms with Fanie, I never met him again.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="650">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Are you now changing your version?   You&#039;ve just told ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="651">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No, I&#039;m not, I did not hear you properly.  The question I thought was whether I saw Mothibe after the incident.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="652">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>I heard your evidence, you saying that Mr Kotelo was shot outside his car.  Is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="653">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="654">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Mrs Kotelo&#039;s version is that when the car was found, it had bullet holes and there was blood on the back seat of the car, have you got any knowledge of that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="655">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No, there were no bullet holes.  The only blood that could have been there was Fanie&#039;s blood because he too got injured in the process.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="656">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>In the process of doing what, Mr Ndlela?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="657">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>When we left the shebeen where there were police, he got cut by a fence in the hand.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="658">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mapoma.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="659">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson, no further questions.  Thank you Mr Ndlela.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="660">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR MAPOMA</text>
		</line>
		<line number="661">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Do you have any re-examination Ms Makhubele?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="662">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="663">
			<speaker>RE-EXAMINATION BY MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Ndlela you said you were sceptical about these certain things in the card and you indicated that you - normally there would be dates written.  Where in the card would the date be written?  Can you just ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="664">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>They are usually written on the columns with the amounts.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="665">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>So say if it&#039;s January, the tick will also indicate if it&#039;s January of 1993, or whatever year that would be?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="666">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>They write the year and the month.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="667">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>For the benefit of the Committee, what would be the reason for renewing membership, do you know?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="668">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>The reason behind that is that the card should not expire because when you register you are given a date and it is indicated whether you pay for two months, three months or the whole year.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="669">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, other than the financial aspects, is there any reason why a membership card should be renewed, or let me put it, does having a card, is it proof that you are still a member of the organisation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="670">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="671">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>I have nothing further.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="672">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MS MAKHUBELE</text>
		</line>
		<line number="673">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I can&#039;t understand your last answer, Mr Ndlela.  You say, by a person merely having a card is proof that he is a member, now what would happen if a person joined, got a card and then two months later wrote a letter saying:  &quot;I resign from my membership&quot; and he keeps the card for the next 10 years, that doesn&#039;t mean he&#039;s a member just because he&#039;s got a card.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="674">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>The proof to the effect that you are still a member is reflected on the months.  If you had resigned, it will not be indicated in the subsequent months, because there will be no ticks.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="675">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>One would imagine that a card reflecting current membership would be proof of your membership, in other words there should be some indication that the card is valid.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="676">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, because you can get hold of the card with no indication that you are a member, with an indication that you are a member, yet there is no proof.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="677">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Ms Makhubele.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="678">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Nothing further, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="679">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Judge Motata, do you have any questions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="680">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Just a few Chairperson thank you.  Mr Ndlela, during 1988 and 89 were you a member of any organisation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="681">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>In 1988, 89 up to 1992 on the 24th of September I was in prison.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="682">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>May you just repeat that because I asked you about these two years, 88 and 89?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="683">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I was in prison during that period.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="684">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Therefore you were not a member of any organisation?  This imprisonment doesn&#039;t say you have ceased your membership of the party you&#039;re supporting, does it suggest that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="685">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct, but I was not participating because I was now in prison.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="686">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>You said you don&#039;t know where the white Camry was abandoned in Johannesburg, do you recall saying so, because you didn&#039;t know Johannesburg well?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="687">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I don&#039;t know Johannesburg very well, but yes the Camry was dropped in Johannesburg.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="688">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>We know that according to your evidence, this incident occurred round about, we could put it between 8 and 9 in the evening, isn&#039;t it so?  That is the killing of Mr Kotelo and the hijacking.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="689">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="690">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>What time did you arrive in Johannesburg, now abandoning the car there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="691">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I did not check the time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="692">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Now you said after Mr Kotelo was told to get out of the car and shot by Fanie, the six of you proceeded to Johannesburg in the car.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="693">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="694">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Help me, when you abandoned the car, what was the decision?  How many people had to go to your co-applicant Mr Mothibe and how many of you had to go back without reporting to Mr Mothibe?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="695">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>People who went to Mothibe were the two females as well as Fanie.  Myself and Dingane went to some other place in town.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="696">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>What other place?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="697">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>We went to a flat, the name of which I do not know.  We slept there and the following day myself and Dingane went back to the township and the others remained behind in town.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="698">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And Colin?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="699">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Colin Mashego remained behind with Fanie.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="700">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So did Colin go with Fanie to Mothibe&#039;s place?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="701">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="702">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, and the two ladies as well?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="703">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="704">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Does she have a name, you&#039;ve given us the name of the other one, you said she&#039;s ....</text>
		</line>
		<line number="705">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I said the names were Maggie and Maripane.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="706">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>So following from what my colleagues have said here, is that now  it was only the two of you that slept at this flat?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="707">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it was only myself and Dingane and the others went to Fanie.  We don&#039;t know where they slept.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="708">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>When you woke up in the morning, you couldn&#039;t see where you were, where this flat was situated?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="709">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I identified the place as Braamfontein, near the bridges.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="710">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Did you walk a long distance to this place?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="711">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Not at all, because there were taxis nearby.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="712">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>So in other words you caught a taxi, don&#039;t say there was a taxi nearby.  The question - we caught a taxi.  Did you catch a taxi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="713">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Not when we went to sleep, we only caught a taxi the following morning when we went back to Daveyton.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="714">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Did it take you - could you approximate how long it took you then to walk to Braamfontein?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="715">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>It did not take us a long time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="716">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Half an hour, an hour?  Let me tell you why I&#039;m asking this question.  The motor vehicle belonging to Mr Kotelo was recovered in Commissioner Street and Braamfontein would be after the Queen Elizabeth bridge and that makes you walking from Carlton Centre, to go through 12 robots, meaning you had to cross 12 streets to get to that bridge and beyond would be Braamfontein.  I&#039;m not trying to be funny, that&#039;s why I&#039;m asking you approximately how long, half an hour, an hour.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="717">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that&#039;s correct, we took that direction.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="718">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>My question was, I wanted a time it took you and that&#039;s an approximation, we can&#039;t say as you walk, you look at your watch, I&#039;ve walked for five minutes, it doesn&#039;t happen like that in real life, but you can approximate and say, I&#039;ve walked for so long, that&#039;s all I&#039;m asking you.  There&#039;s no - from here I&#039;m not going to put trap questions to you, but I want to clarify things in my mind.  Do we understand each other?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="719">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  It&#039;s going to be very difficult because I did not have a watch and I was not noticing the distance as we were walking, I just wanted to get to sleep.  I did not really notice the length of the distance.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="720">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Ndlela.  Now this Mr Kotelo, in relation to this shebeen where you found the two policemen, was it in the same street?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="721">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No.  Mr Kotelo&#039;s house is at the t-junction, the others were in the other street.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="722">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Now these squatter camps where he was told to go out at and shot at, how far are they from where Mr Kotelo lived?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="723">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Would you please repeat the question?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="724">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>I say in relation to Kotelo&#039;s residence, his house, how far is the squatter camp?  You said between two squatter camps, Mandela or Madela and another name, how far are those camps from the Kotelos?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="725">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Or the place where the body was dumped.  How far was the place where the body was dumped from the Kotelo&#039;s household?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="726">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>It could be 200 metres away from Mr Kotelo&#039;s home.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="727">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>And whilst driving for this 200 metres, you never spoke to him about his affiliation or his assistance to PASO, nothing was said of that nature?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="728">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No, I did not talk to Mr Kotelo, only Fanie spoke to him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="729">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Ja, no, no, I&#039;m saying because you are all a unit, other than the ladies who were going to provide cover, should you meet police, you were all - but you are in the same vehicle, if somebody says something to probably Mr Kotelo, say Fanie your Commander then, you would be able to hear?  That&#039;s all I&#039;m finding out, whether in the car anything was asked of him whilst inside the car because your evidence is that when you shot him outside, Fanie spoke but you could not hear what he was saying, you recall that?  That I understood.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="730">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="731">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Now I want in the car.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="732">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Nobody was sad, nothing was said.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="733">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>You people had no interest because at this juncture nobody knew for a fact that he was a member of the PAC, nobody knew as a fact but because he assisted PASO financially and provided transport and defending them, nobody had true facts that he belonged to the PAC.  Wasn&#039;t it of interest to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="734">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>It would be very difficult to answer that question because I was not investigating, I only received an instruction as a member.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="735">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>But this was said even in a meeting, or let me ask you this question perhaps, did you know that interested your co-applicant that he even approached Jackie Selebe, the present Commissioner of Police, and Peter Mokaba who is the member of Parliament about Kotelo&#039;s involvement and the response he got was that they would see the peaceful ...(indistinct) of the East Rand.   That was not know to you either?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="736">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>They did not inform us about such visitations to those people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="737">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>You heard his evidence that it took quite a while, it could have been around February, March, he&#039;s not precise, he cannot remember well, but Mr Kotelo approximately five to six months thereafter when he was killed, because nothing was done, do you recall your co-applicant saying that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="738">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I recall that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="739">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Let&#039;s leave that because you say it&#039;s not within your knowledge.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="740">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Sorry before you leave that one.  But according to Mothibe yesterday, you gentlemen were very upset and angry that Mr Kotelo was assisting PASO against you.  Were you not also upset about what he was doing?  Why didn&#039;t you ask him in the car?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="741">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that got us very angry.  I tried to ask but the information that I got - I tried to ask and I got satisfactory information.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="742">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, I didn&#039;t hear that.  I didn&#039;t hear that.  I tried to ask, but what?  Could you just repeat?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="743">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>It made us very angry yes and the information that I got satisfied me at my level.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="744">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Did Mr Kotelo say anything to you whilst you were in the car?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="745">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No, he didn&#039;t say anything to us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="746">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>It wasn&#039;t ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="747">
			<speaker>INTERPRETER</speaker>
			<text>The speaker&#039;s mike is not active.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="748">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>It was not actually asked of you but it was a response by my colleague to one of the legal representatives about the leather jacket, whether these items were recovered or not and the response came that that came out in Court, was that the leather jacket was sold, did you hear them saying that?  That&#039;s once you were under cross-examination.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="749">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I heard that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="750">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Did you also hear it in Court that the leather jacket was sold?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="751">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I heard that in Court but that was new to me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="752">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Even if it was new to you, did you hear who amongst you people sold the leather jacket?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="753">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No, I did not.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="754">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>You obviously also heard about the watch and the wallet belonging to Mr Kotelo, that it was taken from him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="755">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it was indicated that he was not in possession of his leather jacket, a wallet and a watch.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="756">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Which witness came with that?  We know this Maggie Dladla at least and we know Mrs Kotelo also testified, who came up with that kind of testimony?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="757">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I am not quite certain because it&#039;s been a long time now.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="758">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson, I&#039;ve got no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="759">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Sandi, any questions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="760">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, maybe two, Chairperson.  Where exactly were you waiting for Mr Kotelo at his house to come back from Pretoria?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="761">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>...(not translated)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="762">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m sorry, I didn&#039;t get the interpretation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="763">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>We were at the corner of Eselin and Seso Streets.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="764">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>And where were the two ladies at that stage?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="765">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>They were there among us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="766">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Did they know what you were waiting for?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="767">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No, they had not been told.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="768">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>You said you were waiting there for something not more than five minutes before Mr Kotelo arrived?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="769">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="770">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Were you not worried?  You had just shot these two policemen at the shebeen, were you not worried that someone may have given a chase or alerted the police to go and look for you?  Were you not worried about that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="771">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No, that did not bother us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="772">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Why not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="773">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Because one of us was standing at the corner of Madela and Seso, looking up towards the street to watch for any police vehicle that might come.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="774">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>So the two ladies I suppose must have been quite shocked, or taken by surprise, when they saw you attacking Mr Kotelo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="775">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="776">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Did they at any stage maybe in the car or wherever, ask you why Mr Kotelo was being attacked?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="777">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>No, they did not ask that question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="778">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>You mean to say that they just sat quietly in the vehicle whilst you were travelling with Mr Kotelo without asking a single question?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="779">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>They also were shocked, so that that could be the reason why they didn&#039;t ask a question or questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="780">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Why do you say they were shocked?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="781">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Because what was happening was very scary.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="782">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Thank you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="783">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Can you think of any reasonable reason why Fanie ordered you and the others to go back and shoot those two policemen in the shebeen after they&#039;d been searched and found not to have any weapons?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="784">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, because he said it could be that the firearms of these policemen were in the shebeen, or they were at Lucky&#039;s home.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="785">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, just one.  By the way, did you say Zweli was staying with Lucky?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="786">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="787">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>I didn&#039;t follow that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="788">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="789">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he came to Skodi because he knew Lucky.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="790">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>At what stage did you become aware that Zweli was staying with Lucky?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="791">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I only heard about that in Court.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="792">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But Lucky&#039;s home was next to the deceased&#039;s home?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="793">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="794">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So if the firearms were at Lucky&#039;s home, they would have to get past you in any event to get the firearms, because you were keeping watch on the deceased&#039;s home.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="795">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>When we were standing at the corner, we had already shot them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="796">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But I mean, I&#039;m trying to find out why the - if they thought that the firearms were in Lucky&#039;s house, why go back into the shebeen and shoot them in front of witnesses, when you knew that if they wanted to get their arms, they&#039;d have to come out to get to the house and you could shoot them there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="797">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Fanie said it is possible that the firearms were given to the shebeen owner because firearms were not allowed after all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="798">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Do you really believe that a policeman would had his service pistol over to a shebeen owner?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="799">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>It is possible.  Such things used to happen.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="800">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, any questions arising, Ms Makhubele?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="801">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>None.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="802">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Makondo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="803">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, if I could be allowed to ask something about the card, the membership card, Chairperson?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="804">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="805">
			<speaker>FURTHER CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Ndlela, I noted from the card that there is a card number written in red, printed in red, do you see it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="806">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="807">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>The card that you used to carry or the cards that you are used to, are they similarly having such numbers?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="808">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="809">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Would you dispute that that number is the number of that card?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="810">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I would not dispute that.  There&#039;s one thing that I don&#039;t see, the date of issue.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="811">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Is there a space provided for a date of issue on that card?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="812">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>He&#039;s already explained that, he says that what would happen is if you joined let&#039;s say in March, then there would be something written under that little calendar in the March block saying:  &quot;Date of joining&quot; and whatever, &quot;Payment of R10&quot; or whatever, it would be reflected there, that&#039;s what he said earlier, but it&#039;s clear that there&#039;s no provision on the card for a date of registration and expiry, it&#039;s not contained on the card.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="813">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>If I&#039;ve got it correct, Chairperson, he said that the card that he knows, there&#039;s a space provided for those two.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="814">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s the ANCYL card, he said, yes.  He said his card had a date of registration and an expiry date.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="815">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Ndlela, saving the issue of the date, do you dispute that that is a real original ANC card?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="816">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I would not dispute that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="817">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson, that will be all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="818">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR MAKONDO</text>
		</line>
		<line number="819">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Any questions arising Mr Mapoma?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="820">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>No questions Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="821">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR MAPOMA</text>
		</line>
		<line number="822">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Ndlela, that concludes your testimony.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="823">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
		<line number="824">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Shall we take the lunch adjournment.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="825">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I would propose that we take a late lunch.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="826">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m of the same opinion.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="827">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>We&#039;ve just been asked for a short adjournment at this stage.  Sorry, before we adjourn, Ms Makhubele are you going to lead any other witnesses?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="828">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson that will be the evidence of the applicants, except for maybe just a comment by him about the card.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="829">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I think we&#039;ll let Mr Mothibe comment now.  Let&#039;s just hear that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="830">
			<speaker>EDWARD MOTHIBE</speaker>
			<text>(s.u.o.)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="831">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t what any further evidence, just make a comment about the card that&#039;s been handed in after your testimony.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="832">
			<speaker>MR MOTHIBE</speaker>
			<text>My comments about the card, the purpose of the card is to show the amount and the membership of the ANC each and every year.  It is ...(indistinct) to include the date of the registration on the card.  The secretary when he signs, he also enters the date of the signature and then again the amount paid for the membership and the person who was issuing the card is not the branch in Daveyton, or maybe the branch in Soweto, the Regional Office of the ANC are the people who issue out the card which, during that time, which was Obed Bapena and Patience, they used to come here some of the time, are those people, which during that time they were in charge over the card.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="833">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Now in front of the Committee I&#039;m not disputing about the card, but I know many of the people have got ANC cards, even the criminals, even the IFP members, for the sake, if you go to the other people&#039;s zone, they say to you:  &quot;You&#039;re a member of the IFP&quot; or a member of the what, you can produce.  But now the clarity in this card, I have got a fear in this card, because the purpose of this card is ..(indistinct).  You can carry this card from generation to generation to come, which is not the purpose of the organisation, but the purpose of this card again, to raise funds for the organisation, to help financially.  Now I want to try to say, that&#039;s why you have to bought the card, I&#039;ve never had the card of the ANC.  I was a member of the ANC but when I joined the ANC, I&#039;ve joined the ANC during the time of the apartheid and other things, we never used any card.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="834">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Because it was banned.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="835">
			<speaker>MR MOTHIBE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  But I&#039;ve been involved in a lot of cards.  I started to carry a card when I was in prison, which was two years back and that card I was given by the members of the ANC when they come to prison, the National Executive, because I was in condemn, they gave me the card, before I&#039;ve never carried a card, but I know what&#039;s happening about the card.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="836">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Truly speaking, if there&#039;s any member of any political organisation in this house, he&#039;s got his own card, I don&#039;t know, he can bear with me practically about the card.  I&#039;m not arguing because I&#039;m here for the truth, honesty and fair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="837">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Mothibe.  Does anybody wish to ask him questions, just on that point?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="838">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>No questions, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="839">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>No questions Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="840">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
		<line number="841">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Thank you Mr Mothibe.  We&#039;ll take the short adjournment and then, Mr Makondo, are you leading any evidence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="842">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson, I will ask Mrs Kotelo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="843">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, then as soon as you&#039;re ready or as soon as we receive an indication, then we will resume again.  It won&#039;t be long.  Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="844">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS - ON RESUMPTION</text>
		</line>
		<line number="845">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="846">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Are you going to be calling Mrs Kotelo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="847">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Mrs Kotelo, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="848">
			<speaker>MONICA ANTINA KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="849">
			<speaker>INTERPRETER</speaker>
			<text>Just a minute, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="850">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, we&#039;ve just been asked by the translator to wait for a while.  Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="851">
			<speaker>INTERPRETER</speaker>
			<text>She is on the right channel.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="852">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, will this be - Mrs Kotelo, are you going to testify in English or which language are you going to testify in?  It&#039;s your choice.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="853">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>I could do it in English.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="854">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You can do it in whatever language you like.  If you want to switch during the course of your testimony, you may do so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="855">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;ll switch to Tswana.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="856">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You can do so.  So it will be English and/or Tswana and/or both of them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="857">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="858">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Is it going to be translated for Mr Ndlela?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="859">
			<speaker>INTERPRETER</speaker>
			<text>He understands Sotho.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="860">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, thank you.  Mr Makondo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="861">
			<speaker>MR MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Why shouldn&#039;t we perhaps, Chairperson, ask Mr Ndlela himself whether he would be comfortable either in English or Tswana?  Let&#039;s get it from him, whether he prefers it to be translated in his own language.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="862">
			<speaker>MR NDLELA</speaker>
			<text>I have no problem in any language.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="863">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Ndlela.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="864">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Mr Makondo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="865">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="866">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Mrs Kotelo, you are the widow of the late Mr Arnold Kotelo, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="867">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>It is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="868">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>And basically can you tell us of his political life?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="869">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>I know him as a person who is not politically active.  The only thing that I know is that he was a card-carrying member of the ANC, but he was not an active member.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="870">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Do you perhaps know if he has represented people in a political charges, or something like that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="871">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>No to my knowledge.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="872">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Mrs Kotelo, let&#039;s come to the day in question.  Is it correct that it was a Sunday?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="873">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>It is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="874">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>And briefly can you explain how did it come about that you and Mr Kotelo took this trip to Pretoria?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="875">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>It was around 3 o&#039;clock when my mother phoned to ask whether my sister is already on the way.  My sister was at my place because she attended a funeral on Saturday the 31st of July in Daveyton, so she was supposed to go back home to Pretoria.  So something very urgent emerged at home.  Prof Nogane wanted the keys for the office, they wanted to hold a meeting, so she was the secretary to Prof Nogane, so Prof wanted those keys very urgently, so that&#039;s when Mr Kotelo decided that she won&#039;t use public transport, he would rather take her to Pretoria.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="876">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>If I can ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="877">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You said 3 o&#039;clock, I take it that&#039;s what - 3 p.m. or 3 a.m.?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="878">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>It was 3 p.m. and the meeting was supposed to start 4 p.m. in Pretoria.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="879">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>In this sudden trip, who did he take along?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="880">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>He asked his friend, Mr Papenyano who was a traffic cop, then I also asked whether I could come with the child, then he said there&#039;s no problem, we could come with him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="881">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>And what time did you come back from Pretoria?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="882">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>We left home at about half-past eight in the evening, left Mamelodi, left Pretoria at about half-past eight.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="883">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Were you also in the company of his friend?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="884">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Papenyano was still with us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="885">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>On your way back home, can you briefly explain what happened?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="886">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>When we reached home, I didn&#039;t check time but I would take it, it&#039;s - we usually take about 40 minutes from Mamelodi to - Mamelodi is in Pretoria to our place, so when we reached our house, it was past nine and then we parked our vehicle in front, Mr Kotelo parked the vehicle.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="887">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry before you proceed, Mr Papenyano, did he come to your home as well?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="888">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>No, we dropped him at his place.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="889">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You dropped him first, where?  Also in Daveyton?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="890">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="891">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And then went to your place and you say you arrived there at some time just after nine.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="892">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>Just after nine, yes and then he parked the vehicle right in front of our big gate, the motor gate and then he tried to open the gate.  There was a problem with that gate.  Sometimes if you are outside, you can&#039;t open it because it&#039;s not a lock.  It&#039;s easy to open it when you are inside, so he struggled with the gate, he couldn&#039;t open the gate.  Then we decided to go and look for another guy who used to help us with washing the car and so on, to ask him to come and jump and open the gate from inside and then I came with the suggestion that I don&#039;t think it&#039;s necessary to go and look for Robert because anyway you&#039;re not going to park your car in the garage, your car is staying, the car was staying four or five houses away from us, in one of the neighbour&#039;s garages.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="893">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>So if I get correctly, you left the car where it was in the street because you were going to park it somewhere else.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="894">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>Ja, but we didn&#039;t leave it in the driveway then, he decided that, okay, let&#039;s use the small gate, then he reversed, he climbed over the pavement and then he stopped the car next to the small gate.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="895">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>And then after stopping there, did you go into the house, into the premises?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="896">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he went with us into the premises, to go and open for us because I did not have my key.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="897">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Now which door was he going to open?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="898">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>He was going to open the back door, the kitchen door.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="899">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Did he manage to open the door?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="900">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>He didn&#039;t.  When he was trying to open the door, one of the guys, one of the three gentlemen came with a gun.  Because I had a baby on my back, when I looked on my right side I saw somebody coming through that corner, holding a gun.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="901">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>And from where you were standing, how close was he to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="902">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>Who?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="903">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Kotelo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="904">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Kotelo was just in front of me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="905">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>And with the appearance of this person, did other people appear?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="906">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>No, it was just one guy first, then I was also shocked, I couldn&#039;t tell him that here is a person coming with a gun, I was thinking about the baby, I was thinking about our safety, so I didn&#039;t comment, but at the end I said, &quot;But somebody is coming with a gun&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="907">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>And this person as he was approaching, was he going to reach you first or Mr Kotelo first?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="908">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>Me first.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="909">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>And what happened after you alerted him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="910">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>The gentleman - the guy with the gun said:  &quot;We want the car, give us the car keys&quot;.  At first he wanted to resist and then I said:  &quot;Ag man, just give them the keys.&quot;  He did give them the keys.  Before they went away with the keys, they took away his leather jacket, they took away his watch, they searched him, they took away his R20, they took away his wallet.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="911">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>You said there was one person with a gun.  When you say they who are you referring to?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="912">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>After the other one with the gun came, I think two of them emerged again.  The other one emerged from the right-hand side of the house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="913">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>So from your left-hand side?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="914">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>From my left, I&#039;m sorry.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="915">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>And after he gave away all that they requested, what happened?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="916">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>They kept on shooting in the air.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="917">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What  - just the one with the gun?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="918">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>I saw one with the gun, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="919">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And then that one was shooting in the air.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="920">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>Ja, he kept on shooting in the air while the others were busy searching him, taking his jacket in front of the child, I mean really.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="921">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Could you determine or arrive at a conclusion as to the sobriety of these people?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="922">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>You could see that they were drunk.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="923">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Did you perhaps smell liquor?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="924">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I did, because they were very close to me, especially when they came to Mr Kotelo, when he was still opening the door.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="925">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>These people after they got everything else, did they leave?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="926">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>Yes after getting the keys, the jacket, the wallet and the watch, they left for the car.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="927">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>And what did you do at the time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="928">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>He struggled to open with another key that I had but it couldn&#039;t open because that key was not meant for that door.  The keys that they took, it was together with the house keys.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="929">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Did they leave immediately thereafter?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="930">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>Leave to where?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="931">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>After they left you there, did they go for good?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="932">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>No, no, no, they came back immediately.  I think they had a problem with the car then they said:  &quot;You have to come and start the car for us&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="933">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Did he comply?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="934">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>Yes he did comply.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="935">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>When he went to start the car, did you go with him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="936">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>I didn&#039;t go with him but you know after, I thought no maybe I must just go and see what is happening, you know, because I was scared for the child also, then I went to see what is happening.  When I looked at the car, they were just forcing him in the back.  I think by that time the car was already started, they were just forcing him to get into the car at the back, shoving him inside, doing all sorts of thing.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="937">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>After he got into the car?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="938">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>They drove away.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="939">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Drove away.  The direction they took?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="940">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>They took the direction of Ituatua.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="941">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>After they left, what did you do?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="942">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>I went to the lady that is helping us, to ask for a key, because she&#039;s got our key, so that I can gain entrance into the house and take my car and follow them.  I tried to follow them, I never found them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="943">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Did you report the matter to the police?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="944">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="945">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>And thereafter, after you followed them, how far did you go?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="946">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>I drove as far as, I think I took a turn at Holfontein bridge.  I went back home and I decided that I should phone the colleagues.  I did phone the colleagues.  They came.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="947">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did you say Doornfontein bridge?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="948">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>Holfontein.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="949">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Holfontein.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="950">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>And thereafter, after phoning the colleagues, who came to your rescue?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="951">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Matibela came to my rescue and after that the rest followed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="952">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson, that will be all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="953">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR MAKONDO</text>
		</line>
		<line number="954">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Ms Makhubele, do you have any questions that you&#039;d like to ask Mrs Kotelo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="955">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson.  It&#039;s not - just on one aspect.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="956">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Mrs Kotelo, I&#039;m very sorry about your husband&#039;s death and how old is your child?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="957">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>At that time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="958">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>At the time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="959">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>She was three years.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="960">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Was she the only child?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="961">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="962">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>How many others are you having and what are their ages?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="963">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;ve got the one of 24 and this one of 11.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="964">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Sorry,  24 and 11.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="965">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>... (indistinct - mike not on)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="966">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Is the one that is 11 now.  I just want you to - because you&#039;re the only one who can clarify the Committee, up to now there&#039;s this truth about your husband&#039;s role in the PAC or the PASO struggle.  The applicants have testified that they do not know for certain that he was a PAC person, or personally knew that he was assisting PASO but they heard.   So I just want you to clarify the Commission and furthermore Mrs Kotelo, your husband was an attorney, are you aware of whether he did, because apparently during this time it was unrest period, are you aware whether he did court cases whether involving PAC, ANC, or any political parties?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="967">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>Not to my knowledge.  I don&#039;t remember anything like that.  I don&#039;t remember him representing PAC or ANC members or assisting anybody with anything and as for the money part of it, of assisting, to assist an organisation you have to have funds.  If you are an attorney and you are still living in a four-roomed house, how can you assist an organisation?  Where are you going to get the money to assist the organisation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="968">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>How long had your husband been practising prior 1993?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="969">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>Five years.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="970">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>On the same breath, Mrs Kotelo, are you aware or were you aware then, or let me put it this way, did it happen say in Daveyton that some people were targeted by mere association?  Say if I am seen to be with an ANC person, or to assist them, just be association I would be targeted, did this sort of thing happen in Daveyton during the unrest period, or at all?  It didn&#039;t?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="971">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t know anybody who was targeted and they said he was a political this, political that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="972">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Do you know - this friend you talked about Papenyano, do you know which political organisation he belonged to?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="973">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>No, I don&#039;t know, I only know that he&#039;s a traffic cop.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="974">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>I recently received instructions as you were giving evidence that this Papenyano is actually a PAC person.  What&#039;s your comment to this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="975">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t know anything of that sort.  The only thing that I know, the relationship that Mr Kotelo had with Mr Papenyano, it started with the maintenance case of Mr Papenyano, further than that I don&#039;t know.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="976">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>If I can be excused for a second.  Do you know where this Papenyano stays?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="977">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>Papenyano is late.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="978">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>...(indistinct - mike not on)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="979">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t know, I&#039;m not sure but I think it&#039;s Titon, but I can&#039;t say with certainty because I only saw his place once when we dropped him from Pretoria.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="980">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>The instructions here are he&#039;s staying,  or used to stay at Nareng, or between Nareng and Lovedi.  I don&#039;t know whether these are streets.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="981">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>I can&#039;t say with certainty.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="982">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>I have nothing further.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="983">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MS MAKHUBELE</text>
		</line>
		<line number="984">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Mr Mapoma, any questions you&#039;d like to put?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="985">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>I have no questions Chairperson, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="986">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR MAPOMA</text>
		</line>
		<line number="987">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Judge Motata, any questions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="988">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;ve got none, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="989">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Sandi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="990">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>No questions, thank you Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="991">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Just a couple of questions if I may put to you Mrs Kotelo.  After this tragic incident, did you see the motor vehicle again.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="992">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="993">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What was it&#039;s condition?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="994">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>The vehicle had some bullet holes, there was blood all over the back seat.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="995">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>When you say bullet holes, was it like the car had been shot from the outside?  Where were the bullet holes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="996">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>I can&#039;t remember where were the bullet holes, but the car had some bullet holes, so I can&#039;t tell whether they were shooting from inside or from outside, I don&#039;t know.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="997">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And when you say that you first of all saw the one person with the gun and then later two others came and the items you mentioned were taken, when you went to the vehicle and saw them forcing your husband into the vehicle, did you see any other persons?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="998">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>No, I couldn&#039;t see anybody, but there was a lade that I saw.  I saw one lade in the car, I think.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="999">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What in the car or near the car, or where?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1000">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>No, the lady was not in the car, not when I saw my husband being forced at the back seat.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1001">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Whereabout would she have been?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1002">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>She was next to the car.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1003">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And did you - were you in a position to identify any of your assailants?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1004">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>At the spot?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1005">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Any time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1006">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I did, though I cannot say it was - my neighbour&#039;s lights were on, the street lights were on, only my lights were not on, but you could see the faces.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1007">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did you identify persons when you testified in Court?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1008">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1009">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Who did you identify?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1010">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>Especially Mr Mothibe, he&#039;s the one that I remember.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1011">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Do you remember him doing what?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1012">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>I remember him emerging with that gun.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1013">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1014">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>In Court, I remember him giving evidence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1015">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, but I mean at the incident.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1016">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>At the incident, I remember him coming next to me and tell Mr Kotelo that he wants the keys.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1017">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Could you identify the person who had the gun?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1018">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>He was the one with the gun.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1019">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And Lucky, do you know Lucky?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1020">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t know him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1021">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Is it Lucky Thabo?  Do you know Mr Zweli?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1022">
			<speaker>MR KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>No, I don&#039;t know Mr Zweli.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1023">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Because you&#039;ve heard the evidence today that Lucky lived either very close to you or next to you, did you hear that evidence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1024">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I know where he lives, I know his mother, but I don&#039;t know him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1025">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Whereabout does he live in relation to your house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1026">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>It&#039;s not very far, it&#039;s about I can&#039;t count the houses, but it&#039;s not very far.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1027">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And we&#039;ve also heard evidence about a shebeen.  Do you know of any shebeen close by?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1028">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>No, I don&#039;t know of the shebeen, I only know the street where the shebeen is.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1029">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You&#039;ve produced this ANC membership card.  When did you first see the card?  Did you see the card while your husband was still alive?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1030">
			<speaker>MS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>No, I saw the card after the death, when I was sorting the papers.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1031">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So you can&#039;t say when he became a member?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1032">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>No, I don&#039;t know.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1033">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mrs Kotelo, I&#039;d just like to express our condolences about the death of your husband and we thank you for giving evidence and I&#039;ll ask Mr Makondo whether he has any questions arising out of questions that have been put.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1034">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Nothing Chairperson, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1035">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO RE-EXAMINATION BY MR MAKONDO</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1036">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Ms Makhubele do you have any questions arising out of questions that have been put?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1037">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1038">
			<speaker>FURTHER CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Mrs Kotelo, fortunately the applicants have managed to get statements that were made for the Court trial which the Committee have failed to do for the benefit of the Committee and I have here in my possession, I will circulate it around, a statement made by the police officer who found the car at the scene where it was abandoned.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1039">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry ...(indistinct - mike not on) could just give the name of that policeman who made the statement.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1040">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Sgt Adriaan F Bosman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1041">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sgt A F Bosman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1042">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Yes of the Satellite Station.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1043">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, no I just wanted the name so that we - and then are you going to hand this in as an exhibit?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1044">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I will.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1045">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>That will be Exhibit B.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1046">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  He has described there what he found in the car and if I can just read the relevant portions regarding the condition of the car.  He says that</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1047" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Ek het ondersoek gaan instel ...&quot; ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1048">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>They translate with difficulty from Afrikaans into - could you give an English translation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1049">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1050">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Cartridges.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1051">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Cartridges, shells, yes and the keys which had been locked in in the car and then in a supplementary statement he still talks about blood and the keys and he did mention that the blood was at the back seat of the car, but he says nothing in both these statements about the bullet holes.  Would you say that this is an omission on the part of the police?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1052">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t know whether it&#039;s an omission on the part of the police, but that&#039;s what I saw.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1053">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Do you need these statements, because I was passing them on to Mr Makondo to take a look at.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1054">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Oh, okay, thanks.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1055">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Just after my colleagues ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1056">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Thanks Chairperson.  Did you attend an identification parade prior the trial?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1057">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1058">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>So you only identified him in Court?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1059">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1060">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Unfortunately we don&#039;t have the Court record.  Mr Mothibe says that he was not in the scene, that is at your home, the night your husband was abducted.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1061">
			<speaker>MRS KOTELO</speaker>
			<text>He was there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1062">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MS MAKHUBELE</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1063">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mapoma do you have any questions arising?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1064">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>I have no questions Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1065">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR MAPOMA</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1066">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Mrs Kotelo, thank you very much for testifying.  That concludes your testimony.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1067">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I&#039;m not sure if I could comment about the statement.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1068">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, certainly, you&#039;ve just seen it now.  Of course you can Mr Makondo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1069">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I&#039;ve just gone through and it doesn&#039;t state whether this person when he says &quot;deursoek&quot; him and looking at it, observing or going inside and Chairperson therefore I think it will not be an omission.  Maybe the bullet wounds will be visible only at close range or something like that.  I just want to put it on record that it doesn&#039;t state.  Thank you Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1070">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Mr Makondo do you intend calling any further evidence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1071">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson because my other client, Chairperson, as you could have seen, it&#039;s difficult to not only hearing but even in talking, and I won&#039;t call any other evidence.  This will conclude the evidence of the ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1072">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, we understand, yes thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1073">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Only Chairperson perhaps to put on record that the applicants, both of them, from my instructions, they oppose the application Chairperson, on the basis that I will give forth when I give argument.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1074">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What is the position with Lucky?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1075">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>It came to my attention this morning that apparently, from Mrs Kotelo, when she checked yesterday he was still waiting to be fetched by the Committee so he knows we are here.  Apparently it&#039;s only getting this way, but when I talked to the Co-ordinator the problem was they were not informed that he&#039;s supposed to be fetched or something like that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1076">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  That then concludes the evidence in this matter.  Ms Makhubele do you wish to make any submissions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1077">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson.  I will start with the first applicant Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1078">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE IN ARGUMENT</speaker>
			<text>With regard to the first and the second incident, that&#039;s the incident of Phadi and the IFP attacks on IFP, I do not think - I think he has made a full disclosure and unless the Committee wants me to address on a specific issue, I believe he qualifies.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1079">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Just perhaps one issue, just flashed through my mind, with regard to the other incident, the Kotelo and the two policemen incident, if it was found and I&#039;m not saying it&#039;s going to be found, this is just for purposes of argument, that there hasn&#039;t been a full disclosure in regard to that incident, does that in any way taint the question of full disclosure with regard to the other incidents, or can we compartmentalise them or not?  I just want to know what your views are, we don&#039;t have any strong feelings about ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1080">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>I believe it cannot taint the findings in the other incidents.  The reason being Honourable Chair, what complicates matters in the Kotelo and the Thabo incidents is the disputes of facts which I believe would have been minimised by some more investigation.  For instance ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1081">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>In other words - you see the Act says that an applicant has to make full disclosure of all relevant facts.  Now, it&#039;s a question of interpretation now, if an applicant comes and again I&#039;m not suggesting that we&#039;re finding, it&#039;s just for purposes of argument, if an applicant comes and mentions one incident and he gives it in a straight forth fashion, but then he turns out to be a horrible liar in respect of the other incident, can it be said that he&#039;s given full disclosure of all relevant facts?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1082">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Depending on ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1083">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Or is that relevant facts just applicable to each particular crime that&#039;s been committed or offence, or incident?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1084">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, if ultimately the Committee finds that say he hasn&#039;t made a full disclosure in one, obviously it will be because there is evidence which has been accepted which contradicts his and the reason I&#039;m saying that in the first two incidents that should not be the case, it&#039;s because there is no contrary evidence which has been tendered before the Committee.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1085">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	On the incident of Kotelo and two police officers there, only these two which would lead to him not having made a full disclosure, would be the verification, why he acted with haste and why he got impatient when his superiors had assured him that he should wait for the Peace Forum which would, as far as I can submit, not even constitute a non disclosure, but rather whether he had authority.  He submitted that he believed he had authority because as a person on the ground who was watching people dying, he had to take steps which he was authorised to do and whether one would then interpret that as having usurped the powers of his superiors, depends on the circumstances in consideration.  The question being, at that time, was there enough time to sit and make verifications, reasoning beyond what is happening, or not?  I&#039;m not suggesting that this was a situation where there was urgency, where he had to act.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1086">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But we have a situation, just for your comment again, where we have evidence from the wife of the deceased who says look, he wasn&#039;t a politically active person, but she did find that he was in possession of an ANC membership card, but he wasn&#039;t an activist.  There doesn&#039;t seem to be any reason at all why that evidence shouldn&#039;t be accepted, so the chances are of the deceased having been an activist to such an extent that he&#039;s now supplying money and transport to PASO is remote, which means that there are now two possibilities, one, that if information was received by the applicants relating to the deceased being involved in PASO, that was wrong and it also raises the possibility or on the evidence of Mrs Kotelo namely that there was robbery of watches and lumberjackets and stuff like that and the motor car and when they first came, they only asked for the car and the deceased wasn&#039;t a target, he only became a target as an afterthought when they took him back to the car, that this is a recent fabrication, there was never any information received about  the deceased supporting PASO.  It&#039;s a story that&#039;s been designed to try to make it political for the Amnesty Committee purposes.  I&#039;m not saying that is so, but that is one of the possibilities that we must consider now.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1087">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson, on that the question then, on the belief that he was a member or helping, then the question will be, did he subjectively believe that at that time and he testified that the way they were operating at the time was on trust, the superiors trusting the juniors and maybe them trusting the informers because it would appear this information was obtained in a manner where they had captured one person maybe during the process of extracting a confession which is the way that not even political organisations then were acting on, even the Government, you capture one person, you extract information from him.  Who is your handler?  Then he mentions the name, then the information is acted upon at the time which is why I submit he submitted that at the time, because it&#039;s not the same like when you are investigating something illegal where you have - you can do so openly.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1088">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Again on the question of the events, whether that took place at the house, that applied to the second applicant because he was there, but as far as the first applicant is concerned, his instructions were that they should kidnap him and whether the people who actually went there did that or saw an opportunity to do something for their own benefit ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1089">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But of course you know, subject to the evidence of Mrs Kotelo that she saw him there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1090">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that I accept that, yes.  I&#039;m sorry Chairperson the applicant was just interrupting me.  So on the - and my submission is, I&#039;m not giving evidence, but I want the Court to take judicial notice, during that time, not the Court I&#039;m sorry to refer to you as the Court.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1091">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, no, well look, just carry on but we know very well now, after being involved in so many hearings, what the situation was like in the townships.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1092">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  What I want to submit is that people were targeted, more especially it happened with attorneys, people represent - if it was that period, I would be representing the applicants here at my own risk, or on my own risk.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1093">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>We even know that if people lived in a certain street they&#039;d be targets, just because they lived in a certain area.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1094">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1095">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>It doesn&#039;t matter who they were.  I think you can accept that we understand your argument relating to targeting by association.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1096">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson.  Finally, I just want to comment on one aspect which was raised by Judge Motata during the cross-examination of Mr Mothibe.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1097">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>I did not.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1098">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I was just going to say, I hope it wasn&#039;t cross-examination.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1099">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>I did not.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1100">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Not cross-examination, I just want to comment on the - yes, on clarification that is sought from Mr Mothibe on the question of newspapers, media reports.  Whilst the Committee can take judicial notice that there have been media reports which put the matter in a particular manner, the Committee should also take note of the fact that media reports, particularly in political issues, were not always accurate.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1101">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>No, I think you should understand this in the context in which I asked.  I asked the corpse and the vehicle, which one was found first?  He said the vehicle and the corpse thereafter, that&#039;s why I didn&#039;t want to go into what the media was saying, but he confirmed that was the story which emerged in Court.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1102">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, in any event, the question of what the newspaper said is completely irrelevant because the applicant says he didn&#039;t read them and we&#039;re not going to find that he read the newspapers, we&#039;ve got no basis for finding that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1103">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>My comment is based on a statement which the Judge made further to the effect that in the report there was nothing political mentioned, that&#039;s why I&#039;m raising this.  Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1104">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	And that would be all in respect of the first applicant.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1105">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Regarding the second applicant, my submission is, he has given a view which even where he, where things which under normal circumstances a person - it could have been easy for him to say:  &quot;The two police officers, we realised that they would be a threat, then we shot them&quot;, but he indicated how they did it and that they actually first ascertained they didn&#039;t have firearms, then they went back specifically to shoot them, so in my mind, this is a person who was willing to disclose things which are even detrimental to his application and as regards what actually happened in that place, he carried the orders of the person who had been charged with the duty to oversee them and whether or not he could have disobeyed him and it appears from the evidence, even when the Court gave judgement, it&#039;s this Fanie whom you referred to as the Commander, who although the cop didn&#039;t state that so and so is the one who pulled the trigger, but then the Court said that it&#039;s not them, meaning the people who were being tried, who pulled the trigger, which would be in accordance with his evidence before this Committee that it&#039;s Fanie who pulled the trigger and which would - and it&#039;s therefore my submission that the second applicant, having believed that what was discussed at the meeting about Mr Kotelo had to be carried out, he followed the instructions to the letter.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="1106">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Unless there is something that I should clarify the Committee on, that will be all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1107">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Ms Makhubele.  Mr Makondo do you wish to make any submissions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1108">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1109">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO IN ARGUMENT</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I will in that order follow the process of the first applicant and then the second applicant.  Chairperson, it&#039;s difficult from our point of view to see how political this incident has been, given the way the initiatives or the idea came about as per evidence of the applicant and execution thereof.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1110">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Chairperson, the first applicant has said his duty was to train the SDUs.  As to what really led to him doing further than training, going into the meetings where issues of the area are discussed, what the problems are and how to go about the, it beats my understanding.  His duty was to train.  SDUs were trained underground.  People who were training them would not be seen to be amidst the area where they are working.  Therefore as a trainer it was not his duty, Chairperson, to execute any other thing, unless if he was commanded to do so.  In the military department, Chairperson, we know people work according to orders.  He has said that following the way things are done in the military, he went to Shell House to report to his senior and he was given the response, this matter will be taken to the Peace Committee.  It is clear Chairperson that at that time negotiations were generally everywhere, the idea and the philosophy of reconstructing the whole set-up and correcting the wrongs was already on the way.  His reason of four months later deciding with the others to execute this mission, Chairperson, cannot be understood in any other way excluding to say it was not the command from the top.  He was not following the process that was supposed to be followed.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="1111">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	My submission Chairperson is that this is an afterthought, this is merely to cover the criminal activities in which both applicants were involved.  The reasons are the following, Chairperson.  A person in, be it in MK, be it in any army, has to work with orders.  If there are no orders, then the person is not acting according to the rules and if one&#039;s not acting according to the rules, Chairperson, he cannot come back and say:  &quot;This is my way of doing things&quot;, because he must follow the discipline of the ranks.  Hence, Chairperson, it is difficult for the first applicant to do exactly what he was supposed to do, assessment, making sure that the information he&#039;s getting is proper, making sure that even the person who is being alleged is the right person, an innocent person could have been shot.  He failed to do that because those were not his duties, he could not do them, his duty was to train and not to go further than that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1112">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Four months, Chairperson, perhaps it&#039;s a very long time to some people and short to others.  However, in the four months that he went back, as he said, every time that he went back, there is no time where he reported to the military person to whom he reported to at the end, Zakes, as he said.  Initially it was Jackie Selebe and then Peter Mokaba, but he says he knew that Zakes was the person who had to be reported to in military activities.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="1113">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I therefore submit, Chairperson, that looking at the way the set-up is, it is difficult to come to a conclusion that there was a political objective that was aimed at, hence failing to carry his duties, Chairperson, as I have said.   There was little knowledge of the facts, though he was born and probably bred in Daveyton, he could not go around to assess, so he says.  His comrades came with this information which they got from someone who got it from the informer.  There&#039;s no verification, there is no way that a person could act, Chairperson, take such drastic steps, going as far as targeting and eliminating a person with such little knowledge, not when you are a disciplined, trained, military person, put in the position of a Commander.  It is entirely your duty to see to it that what you are acting upon are facts and not purely allegations.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1114">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Would a disciplined, trained MK Commander take an eye witness on a mission?  I&#039;m thinking about these two ladies that were brought along, they&#039;re not members and it doesn&#039;t sound like a very professional step to take, as far as I&#039;m concerned, notwithstanding the reason given that they would form a front to give if the police came.  I can&#039;t see what real difference having two ladies around would assist them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1115">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, taking it even further than that, would a Commander stay behind when a mission is executed and when such a high profile issue is involved?  Why wouldn&#039;t such a high profile issue be carried by people who not only you rely on in terms of being comrades, who you rely on, are people being combatants, people who have been trained as far as you are.  They knew the risk involved, they allege even the issue of the police, Chairperson.  I find it difficult to say that there was any political motive behind this.  Very, very difficult.  Also Chairperson, as to who was really in charge of the unit, after the second applicant&#039;s evidence I find it difficult to find out as to these two people who were supposed to act in unison, but who don&#039;t contact each other that close, or who, one is actually a bit remote, one is closer, can act together and be able to communicate properly, when they&#039;re actually carrying out an underground mission.  A mission which is not only lethal to their lives, but even to someone else.  They said they were afraid of being known.  They said they knew if they were known they would be arrested, or perhaps they could be shot.  How could they, as Commanders, act in this way?  Chairperson, I fail to see how - what was thought about in the meetings that were set, when they were discussing, the first applicant said:  &quot;A week before we executed we decided we are going to act because the Shell House is doing nothing&quot;.  The second applicant said:  &quot;No, I think a month before or so, we decided we are going to act.&quot;  I&#039;m not clear as to really when was it decided that there&#039;s going to be acted on who, because Chairperson even the issue of Dr Skosana is not clear as to whether, saving what the first applicant has said, it&#039;s not clear as to whether Dr Skosana ,,,(indistinct) attempt, because at lest the co-applicant has no idea about it.  Frankly, from what I heard, he&#039;s not even sure if Dr Skosana is a real person who was also implicated.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1116">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Also the first applicant acted on information when they were not certain about this person, the leadership.  The Evidence Leader asked if he knew leaders of PASO or PAC, numerous names were named, Kotelo was never said.  Chairperson, with their knowledge they know x, y, or z is in this organisation, that they get this information, this one is doing this, it&#039;s leading really it&#039;s merely supporting.  How could you target a person who&#039;s merely adding a drop in an ocean and not go for the exact leadership if the idea was really to destabilise PASO per se.  He has said also, the first applicant, that PASO was gaining power in kwaThema, perhaps 20/30 kilometres away.  Why would someone who is outside the area of kwaThema, if Kotelo was in kwaThema, also linked to PASO, perhaps he would say that&#039;s where the worry is, why would they go and eliminate someone who is 35 kilometres away?  PASO would still gain power from where it was.  If that was the objective, then the way it was done, it was wrong, it was not intended to gain that.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="1117">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I also, Chairperson, have a problem with, as I alluded, with the papers.  He said somewhere he wanted to gain popularity, which I take it as a personal benefit, Chairperson, hence his initiative as he has said, which later comes out that actually it was himself and Fanie, he wanted the things done this way, he says he went to the Kotelo&#039;s house.  Chairperson, the applicant put himself into the action as if he was really in charge of the unit, but from the co-applicant it was actually Fanie who was close and who was in the unit.  When I asked him about finding Mrs Kotelo there he changed and said:  &quot;No, I only found that in Court.&quot;  &quot;What else is contained in these papers that you found in Court?&quot; I asked.  He said:  &quot;Only that.&quot;  My interpretation, Chairperson and my submission is that there could have been more.  The Pretoria trip Chairperson is one.  The findings of the police could be another and the names, Chairperson, particularly the name of Mrs Kotelo, of which the applicant always referred to her in the first name, it brings this view of saying not only was there a plan relating and linking Mr Kotelo, there was also an objective intended and that objective can be anything else but not political.  They found him alone with his wife unarmed, he gave them everything and they took him along.  Chairperson, generally he could have been taken perhaps for interrogation somewhere in one of their hiding places where information would be elicited more as to:  &quot;Is it you?  Who else is doing this?&quot; and what and what and what.  If the aim was to normalise or at least was to balance the set-up as it was, or maybe to destabilise PASO, but that is not the idea.  He&#039;s taken there, he&#039;s put into his car, obviously he has seen them.  If he&#039;s left, he would be able to identify them and the obvious thing is to eliminate him and that&#039;s precisely what happened.  The car is dumped somewhere, perhaps as an afterthought.  Alternatively perhaps there could have been a mistake of locking the keys in.   Said by Mrs Kotelo that initially they could not start the car, that could be another thing that could have happened along the way, that the car could have jammed or they could have failed to start it in any other way.  Hence the submission, Chairperson, that in no way is it seen as a political action or there is a political link to it, Chairperson.  To ask  please on behalf of the victims Chairperson, its submitted that this should be seen merely as a criminal activity.  The membership of the applicant is not questioned, Chairperson, but this action, the act per se that is being applied for, is the one that is being questioned and put in to the Committee that it should be seen in neither way, either than in a non political way.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1118">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	The applicant said when he met Zakes four months later he merely asked, after the reporting, he didn&#039;t comment anything else.  Chairperson, I find it very strange.  I find it strange that after he has reported the action, the person who is in charge, the military man who wouldn&#039;t ask anything about it, obviously their action was contrary to the Peace philosophy that was being preached and that was being taken ...(indistinct).  I find it difficult to say the people in Shell House will sit and do nothing about it.  They&#039;ll obviously be worried because that will be destabilising what they need.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1119">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	In terms of the State Witness, Maggie Dladla, I think Chairperson, perhaps her testimony could be tinted in Court, however she was there.  It&#039;s true that they took her along, it&#039;s true that she was with them in the car, so Chairperson, I submit that some of the facts that the witness did put forth in Court, which I believe made the Court to believe and to come to the conclusion that the Court came to, will apply here.  Similarly she was there, she saw it, perhaps if she was State Witness, as is alleged, being the girlfriend or former girlfriend of first applicant, could also tint one or two things, but it could also add that that could be one of the reasons why she could be taken along, she could be trusted because being one&#039;s girlfriend, maybe for humanitarian reasons, the conscience, the guilt made her to decide otherwise.  Hence our submission Chairperson that this was never political and it has never achieved any political objective. </text>
		</line>
		<line number="1120">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Chairperson in terms of the second applicant, it&#039;s difficult to understand why, when the other policeman Lucky was known to him, when he knew the vicinity very well, when they had realised that Lucky and Mr Zweli, they were not armed, it&#039;s difficult to understand how does he come to say the instructions that were given were in accordance.  He knew the distance, they know the area, they know the getaway, they know where to jump to get the next street and so on.  If that was the idea, Chairperson, if the idea was to eliminate Mr Kotelo, he could have been shot in his house or at his car, you jump and get away before the  person in the next house reacts, you are completely out of the picture.  Hence the issue of having the police shot as being an obstacle, Chairperson it&#039;s difficult to believe.  These people knew the area.  It was at night.  They were not seen by anyone else.  The people they were with, they were their comrades, or they were in their confidence.  There they were, they met this person, the idea is to eliminate him, why not do it there and then?  They are armed, he&#039;s there, he&#039;s in his house, he&#039;s alone, it is at night and they could have escaped and no one else could have traced them.  Actually according to what is being said, if the two ladies who perhaps were not much of comrades, but comrades were left out, the three of them could have disappeared to kwaThema and stage a robbery and go, or even take the car and stage a hi-jacking and go, but that was not the way it&#039;s been done.  He&#039;s taken along, that makes - hence my submission that taking him along was to start the car and the kidnapping and whatever, Chairperson, perhaps if it was planned, it was not intended for a political objective.  Mr Kotelo, he was known around, he was an attorney, Chairperson, in a community like any other township, we know the few professionals who are there.  Also, people who are in the legal profession are very well-known, particularly at the turmoil where everyone would know where to run to.  I fail to understand why either the second applicant or both of them, said they did not know about him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1121">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mrs Kotelo testified that the one was shooting in the air.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1122">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Correct, Chairperson, so she said, but neither of them ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1123">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s what I&#039;m saying, that doesn&#039;t fit in with the applicant&#039;s version that in case a bullet goes out take the police, when they purposely shoot in the air.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1124">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Correct, Chairperson, that will also attract another attention and hence our submission Chairperson, that these political painting of the picture is an afterthought.  Perhaps could have been thought of but there are loopholes which we cannot really fill, merely because there&#039;s nothing to fill those loopholes with and it&#039;s my submission, Chairperson, that the two acts should be seen in their proper perspective as criminal acts and not political actions.  Thank you Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1125">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Mr Mapoma, do you wish to make any submissions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1126">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Not much, Chairperson, just except to address the Committee on the issue of credibility finding being made of the applicants relating to other incidents.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1127">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA IN ARGUMENT</speaker>
			<text>It is my submission Chairperson that given the circumstance, all these applications, the incidents for which application is sought, are contended to have occurred in the same context and by persons who claim to have been members of political organisations.  In the circumstances, Chairperson, it is my submission, if a credibility finding has been made on a particular incident about the applicant, it ought to have an impact on other incidents as well, given the context being the same, it&#039;s difficult to divorce one finding, I mean concerning one incident and the other.  That is all Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1128">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Ms Makhubele, do you have any reply?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1129">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Only on Mr Makondo&#039;s address, just two issues I want to respond on.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1130">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE IN REPLY</speaker>
			<text>First, is the weight which Mr Makondo attacked to written applications.  As evidence has been led, Honourable Committee, the applicants have indicated that they are not the ones who wrote the applications, there are so many contradictions which even when one reads irrelevant questions were answered, answers were not put in the correct columns and as such my submission is that their submission as regards their written applications should be taken into account.  	Secondly, the second thing is the issue relating to Zakes, that, or the people at Shell House, why they were not worried.  Honourable Committee has as Judge Miller indicated yesterday that you have dealt with many applications, I believe you have dealt with many applications by the people at Shell House.  Their leadership, it would appear, even they themselves at the time because the struggle was still intense, they were even themselves involved in some violence in one way or the other at that time.  On, was it Monday or Tuesday, the Committee had an application by amongst others ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1131">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>It was Cosatu I think.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1132">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Cosatu yes, which is an alliance of ANC, so at that time, one can safely submit that perhaps the leadership was not worried too, because they were not satisfied with the negotiations, that they were taking long, maybe they would not work, and the people on the ground like the applicants, they are the ones who were even more restless, so if Shell House people too were restless, what about the people on the ground, applicants included?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1133">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>May I just ask you a question?  Is there any reason why the first applicant and his group, after attacking and killing Mr Kotelo, didn&#039;t go back to Mr Selebe and Peter Mokaba and say:  &quot;Look, remember that problem we were talking about of Kotelo in Daveyton?  I took an initiative and we&#039;ve killed - we&#039;ve sorted it out.&quot;  Is there any reason why he didn&#039;t do that?  He talks to someone else after the operation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1134">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m not sure if he gave an answer, I cannot recall, but I cannot comment now.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1135">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Isn&#039;t that a bit - isn&#039;t that one of the strange things about this case?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1136">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>I think he indicated that the person he was supposed to have reported to initially is Zakes.  Had he found Zakes, there wouldn&#039;t have been a need for him to go to Jackie Selebe or Peter Mokaba, because Zakes it the person who he had to report to initially, which is why he reported to him after the incident.  That would be the explanation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1137">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Or perhaps to say to Jackie Selebe and Peter Mokaba, forget about the Peace Forum, that matter has been dealt with.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1138">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s one of the things which, in retrospect, one could have done, but then under the circumstances, I think he indicated that the person he thought he should report back to is the one he should have reported to initially.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1139">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>But wouldn&#039;t you expect a disciplined soldier in those kind of circumstances, to go back to Peter Mokaba and Mr Selebe and say:  &quot;Look, if you gentlemen continue delaying to deal with this matter, I will be compelled to take my own initiative and do something about it.  You&#039;d better hurry up.  Do something about this immediately.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1140">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>... the present Commissioner, who has also been outside the country, then he knew the discipline of the soldiers.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1141">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, but in - I&#039;m not - I have no idea about military - the hierarchy or the discipline there, but then I can imagine that if you report a matter to your superior, he does nothing and you on the ground are the person who is left to mop the mess, which is what he described as military combat work, that you take the initiative, which is what he did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1142">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>If you could probably get me through this process, I mean of this incident that the initial person was Zakes whom they had to report to, he wasn&#039;t found the first time Jackie Selebe was found and he undertook to take it to the Peace Forum in the East Rand, the second occasion it&#039;s Peter Mokaba who said they shouldn&#039;t worry, he would deal with the situation and we see four months lapses, no mention is made of trying to retrace Zakes, we don&#039;t have evidence before us and now we find that at the end of the day a person who knew nothing about this problem, somebody reports to him.  I can mention to you that the matters we have heard, thousands of them, that the MK cadres never acted in that fashion, but perhaps each case depends on it&#039;s own evidence.  We could listen to you if you take us through that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1143">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>If I were to comment, would that then not indicate that there was no proper reporting structures.  When today you go and you find someone else, there&#039;s no follow-up.  The question would then be, what happens to - can we say that the people on the ground should then be penalised because the seniors, thought there&#039;s a mandate, but then they are not - when he wanted to get a specific one, he could not find the relevant person, but then he has been entrusted with this duty on the ground to make sure that there is peace.  He says he was involved with the Self Defence Units and the ANC except that the Self-Defence Unit was formed and the purpose for which it was formed, what the would have been the purpose for it if each time they had to get specific instructions, when they themselves could not take the initiatives which is what he did.  He tried - he knew that there is this Jackie which, in terms of the local structures, he has to report to, but he cannot find him, but he also has this mandate which he can utilise and he utilises it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1144">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, but a decision to take a person&#039;s life, a particular person&#039;s life, isn&#039;t that a very drastic decision only to be taken in compelling circumstances?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1145">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Well we don&#039;t know what the specific mandates or mandate of the SDUs was or is.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1146">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>But the specific person we are talking about here is Mr Kotelo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1147">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>Take us through that.  If you listen to the evidence, it emanated also from the meetings which the ANC Youth League had, that&#039;s where some of these things were reported about the actions of Kotelo.  It was not a question that the SDUs were seized with this and as the second applicant was an additional member of the Executive of the ANC Youth League, that&#039;s where it also emerged, at least in three meetings, about what Kotelo was doing in assisting COSAS to overcome PASO, or PASO to overcome COSAS, the other way around, that&#039;s the evidence we have heard, unless I did not follow precisely, but that&#039;s the evidence that emerged in this hearing.  So what should we make about that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1148">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>I didn&#039;t get the question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1149">
			<speaker>JUDGE MOTATA</speaker>
			<text>I say the evidence before us is that at least in three meetings the problem which Kotelo was causing by, as the second applicant put it, assisting PASO financially, assisting PASO with transport and defending PASO, this was mentioned in three of the ANC Youth League meetings, of which the second applicant was a member, an additional member.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1150">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>I believed there was interaction between ANC, ANC Youth League, SDUs and COSAS, which is the evidence of the first applicant, that they as SDUs came in to assist there.  Besides the conflict which involved the IFP, they came in to assist the student organisations which were fighting which is PASO and, what&#039;s this other?  COSAS, yes.  Which is how they came in.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1151">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Is that all?  Any further submissions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1152">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson.  As I do not know how the - finally my submission, as I indicated during my initial submission, that one of the things I believe if this matter had been investigated further, they would have a much clearer picture.  The investigation had the names of people who were mentioned, Jackie Selebe, Peter Mokaba, which evidence would have assisted us to come to a conclusion that clearly there&#039;s no way they would have ratified the action or there was no mandate that if they don&#039;t get their approval, they are prevented from taking initiatives  on the ground, which is what he is basing his application on, that as a person on the ground, as a Commander, if he cannot get a mandate, he is entitled to exercise his mandate as a, or take initiative in terms of his duties.  Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1153">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  We will reserve our decision in this matter.  We&#039;ll have to deliberate amongst ourselves and we&#039;ll hand down a written decision as soon as possible.  That then concludes this hearing and Mr Mapoma our role?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1154">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1155">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  I&#039;d just like to thank everybody who made our stay here at JISS Centre this week possible, very much for everything they&#039;ve done, the translators who have worked so hard, Joe Japhta who in his usual efficiency has handled matters in a most professional and friendly manner.  I would like to thank the sound engineers, the media people, the television and also the JISS Centre for making this - Institute for making this venue which is very convenient available and to the caterers who fed us so well and I would also like to make particular mention and pay particular thanks to the members of the Correction Services who have without fail, been here more than punctual, early every morning.  We&#039;ve sat at irregular hours, one night we sat until it was almost dark and I thank them very much and commend them for their efficiency and also for their professionalism in the way that they have carried out their duties this week.  Thank you very much indeed.  I&#039;d like to thank the legal representatives in this matter for their kind assistance, Ms Makhubele, thank you very much and Mr Makondo and Mr Mapoma, thank you very much.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1156">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	We&#039;ll then adjourn now.  Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1157">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>HEARING ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>