<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY HEARINGS</type>
	<startdate>2000-07-06</startdate>
	<location>PRETORIA</location>
	<day>2</day>
	<names>WYBRAND ANDREAS LODEWIKUS DU TOIT</names>
							<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=54314&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/2000/200706pr.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="203">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker>WYBRAND ANDREAS LODEWIKUS DU TOIT</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>As it pleases you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr du Toit, your application is contained in the second bundle which was provided, but if we look at the paginated pages of my bundle, it&#039;s from page 71 as far as page 112, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>MR DU TOIT</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>You confirm the entire content of this application as it is contained here and also the correctness thereof.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker>MR DU TOIT</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>The specific part which is important for this application is contained in pages 108 and 109 of this bundle, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>MR DU TOIT</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>I will just take you through that very quickly.  At this point in time you on various occasions had adjusted these types of watches to act as switches, electronic switches, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>MR DU TOIT</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>And the utilisation of these electric switches was for the purposes of enabling bomb operators like here, to train the people who were operating in that field and various ancillary functions relating to explosives.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>MR DU TOIT</speaker>
			<text>Correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>You had absolutely nothing to do with the planning and anything prior to this operation, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>MR DU TOIT</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>After this operation you were told by Dirk Coetzee that he had used some of these mechanisms in an operation in Swaziland, which is this operation currently before the Committee, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>MR DU TOIT</speaker>
			<text>Correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>You then saw this operation as a political operation, you decided not to do anything about this and kept your knowledge to yourself, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker>MR DU TOIT</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>And in the last paragraph on page 109 of the application, you say that you were not aware that these switches were used in an offence way at that stage, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>MR DU TOIT</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>The fact that you didn&#039;t talk about this is as a result of the fact that you regarded this operation as one which fell within the ambit of a political act or action by the Security Police against the ANC abroad.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>MR DU TOIT</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR VAN DER MERWE</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>No questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MS VAN DER WALT</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>No questions, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR PRINSLOO</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>None.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MS MAKHUBELE</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker>ADV STEENKAMP</speaker>
			<text>No questions, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY ADV STEENKAMP</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr du Toit, did you know what these watches were to be used for?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>MR DU TOIT</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson.  As I said earlier, the watches were normally used for training purposes for bomb disposal operatives.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>No I know, but were you aware that the watches in this case were to be used to blow up a house in which people could be killed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker>MR DU TOIT</speaker>
			<text>No, I had no recollection that anybody came to fetch it from me for that kind of purpose.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But generally speaking, did you know that such a watch could be used or was used for these kinds of operations?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>MR DU TOIT</speaker>
			<text>I didn&#039;t know about specific operations.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>No, no, I&#039;m not talking about specific operations.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker>MR DU TOIT</speaker>
			<text>I was aware that such a mechanism could be used for such a purpose.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And you associated yourself with that purpose?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker>MR DU TOIT</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And you realised that people could be killed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker>MR DU TOIT</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And you reconciled yourself with that possibility?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker>MR DU TOIT</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And also that buildings could be damaged?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker>MR DU TOIT</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr van der Merwe, what is your client asking for amnesty for?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I&#039;m of the view that he was not involved in the conspiracy itself, but that my client was an accessory after the fact to the crimes for which the other applicants are asking for amnesty and that by virtue of the fact that he became aware ex post facto of the fact that these mechanisms had been used and that as a police officer he did nothing further to reveal this offence or crime.  So that would be being an accessory after the fact.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>...(inaudible)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker>INTERPRETER</speaker>
			<text>The speaker&#039;s microphone is not on.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	He prepared a mechanism which he knew was to be used for the purposes of blowing up something, in which people could be killed and he associated himself with that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I will leave it in the hands of the Committee.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Do you have any contradictory or opposing argument on that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>There&#039;s a slight semantic difference, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s really important ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>If it&#039;s not romantic, that&#039;s fine.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>My client&#039;s instructions are that at the point when, or at the stage when he made these things it was for a bona fide utilisation, namely for the training of bomb and bomb explosives and bomb disposal ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker>INTERPRETER</speaker>
			<text>The speaker&#039;s microphone.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="61">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>...(inaudible)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="62">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>For the simple reason that he was aware after this incident of the fact that these watches had been used for offensive purposes outside the borders of the country, in which people were killed and there was damage to property and he did nothing about that.  As a police officer he had knowledge of that.  Obstructing the course of justice, perhaps being an accessory after the fact.  ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="63">
			<speaker>INTERPRETER</speaker>
			<text>The speaker&#039;s microphone.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="64">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>...(inaudible)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="65">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>... in that he committed an omissio, he did nothing.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="66">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Are we not pushing it a bit too far when you say accessory after the fact?  An accessory after the fact is in my view, a person who does something positive to associate himself with an act.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="67">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson, now we&#039;re going to lapse into a very legal technical discussion, but the act of being an accessory after the fact can also be constituted by an omissio.  There are other duties which a policeman has when he becomes aware of an offence or a crime, so there was a duty on Mr du Toit to actually make known this offence.  When he became aware of it he didn&#039;t do that and by his omission he helped other people who had committed an offence, to evade justice.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="68">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I hear what you say.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="69">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>I may just add perhaps at this stage, for the Committee&#039;s benefit, Mr du Toit drafted this application by himself, without legal assistance.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="70">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I&#039;m asking you as a legal representative to help me.  What deeds or what offences should we think of an consider in terms of your client&#039;s application?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="71">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>I think it&#039;s six of one, half a dozen of the other whether it&#039;s defeating the ends of justice or being an accessory, but somewhere between the two one will find the truth and of course then delictual liability as well.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="72">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But if he gets amnesty, then he gets it for the delictual liability as well.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="73">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Thank you, you may be excused.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="74">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
		<line number="75">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Are there any applicants?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="76">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>No, no further witnesses or applicants from my side.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="77">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>None, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="78">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>No evidence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="79">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>I will only call Mrs Hlubi, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="80">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mrs Hlubi, which language would you prefer to use?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="81">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>I prefer to use English, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="82">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Very well.  Are you comfortable with English?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="83">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="84">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Have you any objection to the taking of the oath?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="85">
			<speaker>VALERIE HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="86">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Please be seated.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="87">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Mrs Hlubi, you stay in Swaziland, which part of Swaziland to be exact?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="88">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>I stay in Manzini.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="89">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Your address?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="90">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>You mean my residential address?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="91">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Physical, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="92">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>I stay in Manzini, Extension 1, Zakele, Mazibuko Street, Plot 122.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="93">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>In 1980 your house was damaged?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="94">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>Pardon?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="95">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Your house was damaged during 1980.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="96">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it was on the 4th of June 1980.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="97">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>By virtue of a bomb exploding.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="98">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="99">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>We are told that a house in that area was used as a transit house for members of the military wing of the African National Congress, and applicants now who were members of the Security Forces at the time of South Africa, indicate that a bomb was planted at that house that they regarded as a transit house, have you got any comments about that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="100">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>What I know about this house is that it is just next to my house.  My house is in plot 122 and the house that was occupied by these ANC men was in plot number 123.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="101">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What colour was your house painted?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="102">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>My house was painted white.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="103">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And the house that you refer to as a transit house, what colour was that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="104">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>You mean the one next to me?  It was painted cream/white.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="105">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And the other side of you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="106">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>Which one now?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="107">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>121.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="108">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>124.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="109">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You were 122?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="110">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, 122.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="111">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And 123 was a cream/white house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="112">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, cream/white house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="113">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>121?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="114">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>121 is my neighbour.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="115">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What colour house was that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="116">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>I cannot recall the colour.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="117">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Was that perhaps also all white?  You can&#039;t say?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="118">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>Ja, I can&#039;t say.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="119">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Anyway you say your house was damaged.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="120">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="121">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Can you explain or describe the damage of your house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="122">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>Okay, I was not there when it was damaged because I was working in Babane, my mother was staying in the house with the little boy of about five years.  So when I was at work in the morning at about 8 o&#039;clock, I received a call that I must rush home, something has happened.  Then I had to ask for permission.  I rushed home.  When I reached home I discovered that my house was blown out.  There was no roof and the walls were greatly damaged.  There were big cracks and inside the house there was no furniture.  Curtains were blown out.  The house was just in ruins.  There was nothing that could be valuable found in there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="123">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And did anybody die in your house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="124">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>In my house nobody died, my mother was safe and the boy got out safe.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="125">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And did anything happen to the cream/white house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="126">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>So when I got there they told me one person died in the ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="127">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>In that house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="128">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>No, in the cream/white house where the ANC people used to stay.  Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="129">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What was the condition of that house, how did that look?  How did the damage look there, if there was any?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="130">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>Well it was also blown out and the other side of the house which was just next to mine was blown out, down.  The walls were down.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="131">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And in your case the walls weren&#039;t down?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="132">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>No, the walls were not down.  The roof was out, it was blown out, the whole of it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="133">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>As I understand it, it seems to me - are you saying that there was more damage to the cream/white house than to your house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="134">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>There was a lot of damage even in my house because ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="135">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>No, no, I accept that, but if you take the two houses together, which was more damaged?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="136">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>Both of them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="137">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The one you say had the roof ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="138">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, the cream/white one was also blown out.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="139">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And its walls were down, some of its walls were down?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="140">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="141">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And in the cream/white house, were the windows broken?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="142">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="143">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And the curtains blown out?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="144">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="145">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And in your house your curtains were blown out, your windows were broken and the roof blown out?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="146">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="147">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What with the walls?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="148">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>The walls were cracked.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="149">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Cracked?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="150">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>They had big cracks, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="151">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  Carry on.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="152">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Were there any other damages to neighbouring properties, or was it just your own?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="153">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>The other side which was on plot 121, the doors were damaged and the windows also.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="154">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Anything else?  Plot 124, for example.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="155">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m not very sure about plot 124.  What I knew is that in the morning when they opened the doors they found the head and the arm in front of the door, of the victim that was staying in number 123.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="156">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>The body was found in plot 124?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="157">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, the arm and the head and the remains were inside the house, 123.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="158">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Were you housing any activists?  Were there any political organisation from South Africa?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="159">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>In my house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="160">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="161">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>No, there wasn&#039;t.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="162">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>How far are these houses from each other?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="163">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>Mine and the cream one?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="164">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="165">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>They are about 10 metres away.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="166">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>Have you repaired the damage to your house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="167">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I repaired it.  I had to contact my government and plead with them for a loan, then they gave me the loan and then I started to repair it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="168">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What did it cost you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="169">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>Pardon?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="170">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What did it cost you to repair the house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="171">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>It cost me about 33 000.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="172">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="173">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>Rands.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="174">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Rand.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="175">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, at that time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="176">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>What&#039;s your comment to the applicants&#039; application for amnesty for this incident?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="177">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>Personally I&#039;ve no right to stop them from applying for amnesty, but what I would like the TRC to do for me, I would like to see justice done in this matter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="178">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>In which sense?  Save for yourself, what would you like?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="179">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>As far as I&#039;m concerned, I&#039;d like to - like as I said before, I tried to look for, or to ask for some compensation.  I wrote to some organisations and I failed, nothing came out.  What I would like the TRC to do for me is to give some kind of compensation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="180">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You have a passport?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="181">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="182">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Which country do you carry a passport for?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="183">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>I have a passport for Swaziland.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="184">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And you&#039;re a Swaziland citizen?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="185">
			<speaker>MS HLUBI</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="186">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Anything more?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="187">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s the evidence-in-chief.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="188">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MS MAKHUBELE</text>
		</line>
		<line number="189">
			<speaker>MR VICTOR</speaker>
			<text>I have no questions, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="190">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR VICTOR</text>
		</line>
		<line number="191">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>No questions, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="192">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR VAN DER MERWE</text>
		</line>
		<line number="193">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>No questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="194">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MS VAN DER WALT</text>
		</line>
		<line number="195">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>No questions, thank you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="196">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR PRINSLOO</text>
		</line>
		<line number="197">
			<speaker>ADV STEENKAMP</speaker>
			<text>No questions, Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="198">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY ADV STEENKAMP</text>
		</line>
		<line number="199">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
		<line number="200">
			<speaker>MS MAKHUBELE</speaker>
			<text>I have no further witnesses.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="201">
			<speaker>ADV STEENKAMP</speaker>
			<text>No further witnesses, thank you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="202">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes thank you.  We don&#039;t need any arguments from anyone.  We&#039;ll reserve judgment and deliver it as soon as possible.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="203">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>