<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY HEARINGS</type>
	<startdate>2000-07-25</startdate>
	<location>PRETORIA</location>
	<day>5</day>
	<names>R RABOTAPI</names>
	<case>AM64313/97</case>
	<matter>MATTER POSTPONED</matter>
					<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=54373&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/2000/200725pt.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="15">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson, the next matter is Rabotapi, amnesty application 6313.  It appears as 16 in the summarised schedule and appears as N in the paginated bundle.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>That matter, Chairperson and this is where I have a very big difficulty, the person Rabotapi whom we&#039;ve been looking for, was found and finally arrived here this morning, Chairperson, but it then transpired that this is the wrong Rabotapi, it&#039;s not the person whom we&#039;ve looked for.  I have had a discussion with the victim in this matter who has an idea where the real Rabotapi could be.  My feeling and understanding about this matter is that the applicant and the victim both belonged to one political organisation, they still do, they all work for the Government, there is a possibility that this matter will be withdrawn, Chairperson.  However, I am unable to say so before I have spoken to the correct Rabotapi and in this instance, I have no suggestion, it may well be that the Committee wants to strike the matter off, or push this matter to another Committee, but I am unable to take the matter any further, because I&#039;ve not spoken to the correct applicant.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Where does the correct applicant live?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>I have no idea, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I mean we have here a copy of a letter sent to him at 8492 Zone 6, P O Kotzo, Diepkloof.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>From what I got from the victim, he works around Pretoria and it may well be that the address you&#039;re referring to is an old address.  He&#039;s normally seen in the Pretoria area, he works for Military Police.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So there&#039;s no information that he has been properly served, or given notice of the application?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Well that is indeed so, Chairperson, I have not served him with a notice.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And when an effort was made to find him, they went and found the wrong person?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s what we did.  We thought that was the correct Rabotapi, but it wasn&#039;t.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Well it seems to me that the best thing we can do is remove it from our roll and add to that a request to the Committee presided over by Judge Potgieter which is sitting in Johannesburg next week, to hear the matter, if you are able to make contact with the applicant and if you can satisfy that Committee that it can be dealt with  promptly without disorganising that Committee&#039;s schedule and we would suggest perhaps that it should be till Thursday of next week, when you will be appearing before that Committee.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>JUDGE DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>If there&#039;s a withdrawal, they could fax it through to Cape Town.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Or if there&#039;s a withdrawal before then, you can fax that to Cape Town, where it can be dealt with and there will be no problem.  We must obviously communicate with Judge Potgieter and tell him we&#039;ve now sent another one to him, which if it turns out is a matter that is going to be contested,  which appears extremely unlikely in view of what you said, except as to the value of the chess board and matters of that nature, he may deal with it, he may not.  We can&#039;t guarantee that, I want to make it clear that we are not guaranteeing that the matter will be heard next Thursday.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>I fully understand that Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Then Chairperson, the last matter is that of Twala and Ramphomane.  Twala appears as 9, Ramphomane as number 10 in the summarised schedule and they appear as H in the paginated bundle.</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>