<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY HEARING</type>
	<startdate>2000-08-14</startdate>
	<location>IDASA, PRETORIA</location>
	<day>1</day>
	<names>SCHALK JAN VISSER, ABDUCTION OF JABULANI SIDNEY MSIBI</names>
	<case>AM5000/97</case>
	<matter>DE KOCK 7</matter>
					<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=54397&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/2000/200814pt.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="573">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Good morning everybody.  The Panel has changed as most of you would be aware from the bundle of documents.  My name is Motata, I will be chairing these hearings and on my right I have Adv Bosman and on my left I have Adv Sandi.  Today we&#039;ll be hearing the applications of Messrs Eugene Alexander de Kock, amnesty number 0066/96, Willem Albertus Nortje, amnesty number 3764/96, Izak Daniel Bosch, amnesty number 3765/96, Willem Frederick Schoon, amnesty number 4396/96, Schalk Jan Visser, amnesty number 5000/97, Gert Visser, amnesty number 5002/97 and Daniel Jacobus Greyling, amnesty number 5007/97.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I will the legal representatives ... who is the one more?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>The one more is Frank McCarter, Honourable Chair-person, amnesty application number 4063/96.  The application was in fact added on and it&#039;s to be found in bundle 2.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  We&#039;ll have the last, Frank McCarter, amnesty number 4063/96.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I&#039;ll request the legal representatives to place themselves on record.  Could we start with Mr Eugene Alexander de Kock?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker>MR HUGO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairman.  My name is S W Hugo and I&#039;m appearing on behalf of Mr de Kock.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Hugo.  For Nortje?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.  Lamey from the firm Rooth and Wessels, I represent Mr Nortje, as well as well as applicant Izak Daniel Bosch.  Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Lamey.  Mr Schoon?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>May it please you, Chairperson and Members of the Committee, my name is Louis Visser, I appear for W F Schoon, instructed by Wagener and Muller Attorneys.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Visser.  Mr Visser, not as in legal representative.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.  I&#039;m Louisa van der Walt and I&#039;m appearing on behalf of Mr S J Visser.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Ms van der Walt.  Gert Visser?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>As it pleases the Honourable Chairperson, I&#039;m Harry Prinsloo and I&#039;m appearing on behalf of Gert Visser and Daniel Jacobus Greyling.  As it pleases you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Prinsloo.  Mr Frank McCarter?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>As it pleases you, Mr Chairman.  My name is Christo Nel, I act on behalf of Mr McCarter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Nel.  And lastly but not least, are we coming to the end?  Are there other interested parties?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>For the victims, Honourable Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Makondo, which victims?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.  I&#039;m representing the Msibi family.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Makondo.  Ms Patel, you must be interested in the proceedings.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>I am as well, but besides myself there&#039;s my learned colleague Mr Cornelius who needs to address you as well in respect of his client, Mr Vermeulen.  But for the record, I&#039;m Ramula Patel, Leader of Evidence.  Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I hadn&#039;t forgotten you, because you are still going to bring an application as well in these proceedings.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chair.  I&#039;ve tabled an application which I&#039;ve given to all my colleagues as well as to the Committee, of the inclusion of Nicolaas Johannes Vermeulen, as an applicant in this matter.  I have included in the application his full affidavit as well as the annexed application which was bound into the Sedibe incident.  What happened in short, Judge, is that when he drew the original application he confused the Sedibe name with Msibi, and when he perused the application in the matters of Sedibe, he realised that he made a mistake and in fact referred to Msibi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Judge, you will note that from all the other applications it is supported that he&#039;s referred to in all the applications and he is in fact an applicant.  So I pray that this Committee grants an order that he may be included as an applicant and that we may participate in the proceedings.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	For the record, I am Wim Cornelius, I&#039;m acting on behalf of Mr Vermeulen.  His application number, I think for the sake of completeness, is 4358/96.  I did not include that on the application.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Cornelius.  I would not say I&#039;m undermining anybody here, I&#039;ll start with seniority.  Mr Louis Visser, any opposition to the amendment?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Not today, thank you Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Prinsloo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>No objection, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker>MR HUGO</speaker>
			<text>No objection, thank you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Ms van der Walt?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>No objection, thank you Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Lamey?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>No objection, Chairperson, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>No objection, Chairperson, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Nel?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>I have no objection, thank you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Ms Patel?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>No objection, thank you Honourable Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Lamey, have I referred to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Oh, thank you.  Mr Cornelius, firstly let me just find out, has he applied in the Sedibe matter?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>He&#039;s applied in the Sedibe matter, Judge, and I think it will just be appropriate then to withdraw the application in the matter of Sedibe, for the sake of completeness.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And then he&#039;ll only be going on on the Jabulani Sydney Msibi matter?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>That is quite right, Judge, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Cornelius, I seem to recall that the Sedibe matter was on the roll on a previous occasion.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Advocate Bosman.  What we did, I tabled the problem I had at that time and I discussed it, I think with Ms Patel, I&#039;m not sure, or one of the ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>You have not filed a sort of withdrawal notice yet, have you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>No, we indicated to the ...(indistinct) that we are withdrawing and they said it will be appropriate to bring this application at this hearing, that is why I&#039;m only tabling this application now.  But if necessary I&#039;ll file a formal withdrawal today.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Well once of course the Chairperson&#039;s made the ruling, I think that should be done as soon as possible.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>It will be seen to.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Your application is granted and I would say, during the course of the day, would you formally file a notice of withdrawal in respect of Glory Sedibe?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>I thank the Committee for the order, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What order are we going to have?  I see on the bundles we have Mr Eugene Alexander de Kock, but I&#039;m in your hands who wants to start first.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, at this point everybody always looks at me, so I&#039;ll start off by saying the following, that I&#039;m not starting off with the evidence, in this particular case, Chairperson.  There was some background that happened prior to the abduction and we thought it fit and proper to start with the background leading up and we will try to lead the evidence in chronological order, as people came into the matter as it went along.  I think it will make more sense, and all my learned friends are in agreement with that proposal.  So that would mean that Ms van der Walt will start first with Brig Visser.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, I think it will tidy even the record, it will look at least decent or readable I suppose.  Thank you, Mr Visser.  Ms van der Walt?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson, it has been decided as such and I call Mr S J Visser.  Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker>SCHALK JAN VISSER</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="61">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Advocate Bosman.  You may be seated, Mr Visser.  You may proceed, Ms van der Walt.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="62">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="63">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Visser, your application can be found in the first bundle from page 15 to 17, that is the formal application and the incident for which you have applied for amnesty today, is from page 18 to 20, and the political motivation can be found from page 21 to 28, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="64">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="65">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>You are applying today for the abduction of Mr Msibi from Swaziland, could you just sketch the background to the Committee, the background which led to the abduction of Mr Msibi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="66">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR S J VISSER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="67" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;During the &#039;80s, Chairperson, I realised on the basis of Intelligence investigations, that the Eastern Transvaal Security Branch could possibly be infiltrated by an ANC member and that information could be conveyed to the ANC.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="68">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>		A process of elimination was followed and it was determined with relevant certainty that the leakage had occurred in Nelspruit and that W/O Malaza could have been the possible culprit.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="69">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>		After a monitoring action of Malaza by the Senior Superintendent Visser from the Security Branch, this suspicion was confirmed.  Malaza was brought to the Head Office where he was interrogated by the former Brig Stadler.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="70">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>May I just interrupt you.  Were you present during this interrogation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="71">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>No, I was not present during this interrogation in Pretoria.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="72">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Very well.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="73">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR S J VISSER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="74" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;During the interrogation it was also established, according to my knowledge, that Malaza had had liaison with two other members of the Security Police, namely Rabuli and Mokgabudi, and had manipulated them into providing information for the ANC.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="75">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Is that personal knowledge, Mr Visser, or did this emanate from the interrogation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="76">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>It came to my knowledge after Malaza had been interrogated and after it had come to light that he had had liaison with other members of the force.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="77">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>And was any action planned after you had obtained this information?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="78">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Planning was undertaken at the Head Office of the Security Branch, to identify his instructor in Swaziland.  I was never involved with the planning, but I was aware of it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="79">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>And did you receive any subsequent instructions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="80">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Subsequently, I was present at the Oshoek border post with Maj-Gen Stadler and Brig Schoon, as well as Senior Superintendent Visser and W/O Greyling, as well as members of the Vlakplaas unit and Col Eugene de Kock.  During this time, Malaza was taken over the border to Swaziland, so that his handler could be identified.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="81">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>And what happened subsequently?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="82">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR S J VISSER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="83" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;At a later stage, Col de Kock came back over the border with a black man by the name of Msibi.  Msibi was a trained MK member of the ANC, and he was in control of the Military machinery of the ANC in Swaziland.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="84">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>How do you know that Msibi was a trained MK member?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="85">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>This was based upon security reports which were at the disposal of the Security Branch.  These reports confirmed that he was indeed an ANC member.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="86">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>May I just ask you, when Mr Msibi was brought across the border, do you know whether or not he was assaulted in any way, in your presence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="87">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I am aware that he was indeed assaulted.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="88">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Where was this, was this at the border post?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="89">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="90">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Do you know who assaulted him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="91">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m not entirely certain who was involved, but he was assaulted by members in my presence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="92">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Was he interrogated in your presence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="93">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, in general terms, he was interrogated there and then taken to Pretoria, for further detention.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="94">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>And when you say that he was taken to Pretoria, do you know where in Pretoria he was detained?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="95">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>He was taken to a premises at Daisy, as far as I can recall.  This was in Pretoria.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="96">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>In your application you state on page 20 that at a later stage, Msibi was transferred to Eastern Transvaal, why was he transferred to Eastern Transvaal?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="97">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson, upon my request he was transferred to Eastern Transvaal and he was detained at the Witrivier Police Station, in order to make an attempt to reoriented him and so doing obtain information regarding the ANC activities in Swaziland.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="98">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Do you have any knowledge regarding an incident where Judge Goldstone was involved?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="99">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I am aware of that, I was informed of it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="100">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>You don&#039;t have personal knowledge of it, but what was the information that you received?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="101">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>The information that I received was that Judge Goldstone had visited the Brits Police Station and had viewed Msibi there while Msibi was being detained there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="102">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Is this the reason why you requested him to be transferred to Eastern Transvaal, or what was the actual reason for your request for his transfer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="103">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I believe that Msibi could indeed be capable of providing further particulars to us regarding ANC activities in Swaziland, and that due to the fact that we were responsible for Intelligence work in Swaziland, we needed to be able to interrogate him and obtain information from him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="104">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Did you obtain any information from him, was he willing to cooperate?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="105">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>He was willing to cooperate, he declared himself as such and later he was handed over to a former Brigadier, who would deal with him as an informer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="106">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Why was it necessary to remove Msibi from Swaziland?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="107">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>He was a member of the Transvaal machinery, he was connected to the ANC Intelligence structure and I also believe that he was involved in the planning of infiltration, the placement of landmines and bombs, in restaurants and so forth.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="108">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Mr Visser, you then apply today before the Honourable Committee, for conspiracy to abduct as well as abduction, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="109">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="110">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Furthermore, you are applying for the assault which took place in your presence, although you yourself did not participate in the assault.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="111">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="112">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>And furthermore, are you applying for defeating the ends of justice because you did not disclose the true course of events in South Africa, pertaining to the abduction of Msibi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="113">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="114">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>As well as any civil liability which may emanate from these deeds, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="115">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is my application.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="116">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>Did you draw any financial advantage or personal advantage from the abduction of Mr Msibi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="117">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Absolutely nothing.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="118">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>No further questions, thank you Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="119">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MS VAN DER WALT</text>
		</line>
		<line number="120">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Ms van der Walt.  Mr Hugo, any cross-examination?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="121">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR HUGO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, thank you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="122">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Visser, can you recall how many persons from the Vlakplaas contingency crossed the border with Mr Malaza in order to abduct Mr Msibi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="123">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>No, I cannot say precisely how many persons went along.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="124">
			<speaker>MR HUGO</speaker>
			<text>Very well.  Can you tell us whether or not you can recall that the assault which took place at the border post, whether Mr de Kock was part of this assault?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="125">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I cannot specifically, but it is possible that this may have taken place in the process.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="126">
			<speaker>MR HUGO</speaker>
			<text>Well then let me put it to you that Mr de Kock stated that it is indeed possible that he may have participated in the assault in the regard that he may have dealt a few blows.  Do you think that would be possible?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="127">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it is possible.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="128">
			<speaker>MR HUGO</speaker>
			<text>Then with regard to the initial planning phase, was any consideration given to the killing of Mr Msibi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="129">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Not as far as I know.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="130">
			<speaker>MR HUGO</speaker>
			<text>And it was also not told to you from within the upper echelons of the rank structure that it was their intention to kill him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="131">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="132">
			<speaker>MR HUGO</speaker>
			<text>With regard to Mr de Kock&#039;s position you would most probably agree that he was subordinate to you as well as to Brig Schoon, and that he acted based upon the strength of your orders.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="133">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="134">
			<speaker>MR HUGO</speaker>
			<text>I have no further questions, thank you Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="135">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR HUGO</text>
		</line>
		<line number="136">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Hugo.  Mr Visser.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="137">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="138">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Visser, just to provide some background for the Committee, we are aware of the historic perspective that in the beginning of the &#039;80s, a summit took place in Simon&#039;s Town, where certain divisions were made for actions by the Security Forces against what was known at that stage as terrorists or revolutionaries, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="139">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="140">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And you were stationed in the Eastern Transvaal?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="141">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I was the Divisional Commander of the Eastern Transvaal region.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="142">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And this brought you into close proximity with the problems originating within Swaziland?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="143">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="144">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And if I understand correctly, it is also your comprehension that with regard to the Simon&#039;s Town summit, the Security Police acted in Swaziland and not the Defence Force.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="145">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that was the decision.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="146">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>You have already referred to this, but would it be correct for me to say that from 1986 onwards there was a serious intensification in actions and acts of terrorism within South Africa, which were launched from Swaziland?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="147">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, there were numerous cases.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="148">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>You have already stated in your evidence that Mr Msibi was in control of the Military machinery of the ANC in Swaziland, but wouldn&#039;t it instead be correct to say that he was the Head of Intelligence of the ANC in Swaziland?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="149">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>He was the Head of the Intelligence division, but he was also involved by nature of the situation, in the Transvaal machinery which conducted planning.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="150">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  And his contribution or his activities for example, did this involve among others, the assistance to persons who were in exile from South Africa to receive training abroad, in order to return again to South Africa?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="151">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it is possible.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="152">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Well please say if you are not aware of these things.  You say that you read security reports pertaining to him, do you know whether or not he was involved in the provision of arms and ammunition, for example?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="153">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I cannot recall.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="154">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>You cannot say.  Well, then let&#039;s leave it at that.  According to the norms which were applied at the Security Branch of the Police during those years, would we have been able to describe Mr Msibi as a target of the Security Branch?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="155">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, we would have.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="156">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And we are aware from the numerous amnesty applications that many targets of the Security Branch were indeed eliminated.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="157">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="158">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Both internally and externally in some of the neighbouring States.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="159">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="160">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Now in this case apparently it was decided not to eliminate Mr Msibi, but rather to  attempt to recruit him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="161">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="162">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>What was the advantage to that?  According to you as a Security man, if you were able to recruit an important ANC person rather than eliminating him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="163">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>He would have been in a position to provide further information to us regarding further planning pertaining to actions by the ANC in the RSA.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="164">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And were the Security Branch&#039;s actions based upon the information that you received from informers and coverage agents?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="165">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>We have a report here which Ms Patel gave us this morning, I just want to ask you, I&#039;m not going to refer to the report as such, but apparently according to Mr Msibi, he was offered money, I just want to know whether or not you are the person who offered him money to persuade him to act as - Chairperson, I believe we&#039;ll hand it up later if necessary, at this stage it&#039;s not necessary to hand it up ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="166">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You may proceed on those basis, at the time when it&#039;s handed up we will mark it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="167">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="168">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	In which he states that an offer of R2 000 was made to him to cooperate with the Security Branch, are you aware of this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="169">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I was not present, but I am aware that money was paid out to him after he declared his willingness to cooperate with us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="170">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And according to your knowledge, would further amounts have been paid over to him, or was it only this one amount?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="171">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>He would have been paid on a regular basis.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="172">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson, nothing further.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="173">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR VISSER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="174">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Visser.  Mr Lamey?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="175">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="176">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Brigadier Visser, the assault which took place at the Oshoek border post, I deduce from your evidence and from your impression that it was not a serious and a lengthy assault, am I correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="177">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>No, it didn&#039;t last very long.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="178">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>He had another destination and that was to go to Pretoria the next day, where further interrogation would be conducted.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="179">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Upon the same day of his abduction he was taken to Pretoria.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="180">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Who had vested interests in his abduction and his interrogation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="181">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>The Generals, such as Gen Stadler and other members of the Security Branch.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="182">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Do you also know that he was transferred by means of Army helicopter to the Intelligence division of the Defence Force?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="183">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m not aware of that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="184">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>I have no further questions, thank you Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="185">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR LAMEY</text>
		</line>
		<line number="186">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Lamey.  Mr Prinsloo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="187">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="188">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Visser, are you aware of the fact that two former members of the Security Branch who were stationed at Kompol in Pretoria, were prosecuted due to the fact that they had provided top secret information to the ANC, via Mr Malaza to Mr Msibi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="189">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I&#039;m aware of that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="190">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And are you aware of the fact that both those members were prosecuted in the Regional Court, regarding various charges and that Mr Msibi indeed testified against those two members as a State witness?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="191">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I am aware of this.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="192">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And are you also aware that Mr Msibi, from within his position in Swaziland, was the Head of Military Intelligence?  Did you have that information or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="193">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I was aware of such information.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="194">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And by nature of his position he occupied  a very high-ranking position which would have brought him into contact with much information.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="195">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="196">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And would that information have been valuable to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="197">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it would have been valuable to me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="198">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And specifically the involvement of a member of the Security Branch in Nelspruit, a Mr Malaza whom you have already given evidence about, who gave information to the ANC and recruited other persons, was it important for you to determine what precisely Mr Malaza&#039;s role was with Mr Msibi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="199">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, it was crucial to me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="200">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And would that information have hampered any Security Branch investigations against the ANC, if Mr Msibi had not been abducted?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="201">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it would have placed the Security actions at a disadvantage.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="202">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Was it a matter of national interest for you, in terms of abducting him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="203">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it was important to eliminate him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="204">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="205">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR PRINSLOO</text>
		</line>
		<line number="206">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Mr Nel?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="207">
			<speaker>MR NEL</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairperson, I&#039;ve no questions for Mr Visser.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="208">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR NEL</text>
		</line>
		<line number="209">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Mr Makondo?  Firstly, Mr Cornelius.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="210">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>I have no questions, thank you Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="211">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR CORNELIUS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="212">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Mr Makondo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="213">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="214">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Visser, you said Mr Msibi was - or Mr Malaza was monitored, can you give details as to what came out of that monitoring?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="215">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Could you just repeat the last part of your question please, I could not hear it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="216">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>You talked of Mr Malaza being monitored, can you give the details and the outcome thereof.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="217">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Reports that came from different sources, we compared them with each other and on this basis we then decided that information, or it seemed that information was leaked from Nelspruit, and we could point a finger at Malaza.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="218">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>I heard you saying it was Visser who was monitoring him, am I correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="219">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it was Col Visser, he was a Senior Superintendent Visser, he did the monitoring.  He was the Branch Commander at that stage.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="220">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Now what other sources are you talking about when you say from different sources?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="221">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>We handled different informants who provided us with intelligence reports.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="222">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Is it not proper to say exactly what I&#039;m asking, like X, Y and Z were the people who were helping in the monitoring?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="223">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>No, at this stage I won&#039;t be able to give you the details of it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="224">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Why not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="225">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I cannot recall and I cannot give you that specific - I cannot recall that specific information.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="226">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>You talked of believing from your sources of the role that Mr Msibi was doing, am I correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="227">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, because of information reports that we received, I was aware that he was involved in the ANC, that he was a trained ANC member.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="228">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>And the role you talk about, was it ever confirmed or you took it from your sources only?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="229">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>It was at a later stage confirmed that he was a member of the ANC and that he did fulfil these roles.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="230">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>His involvement with Malaza, did you confirm the interaction perhaps?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="231">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>It was confirmed on the hand of the information that Malaza himself provided us with.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="232">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>And the assault, can you detail the assault at the border, when you were present?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="233">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>He was shaken and there could have been blows.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="234">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>I have with me here a copy of a newspaper, The New Nation, page 4 thereof of December 1999, which I believe everyone is having. - &#039;89, Chairperson, thank you.  I beg leave to hand it over to the Commission if they don&#039;t have any.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="235">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>We do have copies.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="236">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, please may it be marked A.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="237">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The New Nation, page 4, December 1989, will be marked Exhibit A.  You may proceed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="238">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="239">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	This is the press conference that Mr Msibi gave after his release and I will particularly concentrate on the border where you said you were involved ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="240">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Let&#039;s say an excerpt.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="241">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="242">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I&#039;ll particularly concentrate on the border, his report as to what happened there.  He says on the second column, the third paragraph - no, the fourth one which starts with:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="243" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I was lifted and place in a jeep&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="244">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Do you find it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="245">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I have this paragraph, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="246">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>He describes there what happened, he says amongst others, adhesive tape was put on his mouth and then he said that an iron leg was placed on his feet, and you have said there were only a few slaps and he was just shaken around.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="247">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>At that stage I was not present, I was on the South African side of the border and this occurred, apparently, on the Swaziland side of the border.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="248">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>To be precise, he says the adhesive tape was removed, not placed.  I don&#039;t think that&#039;s the true reading of the paragraph you&#039;re referring to.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="249">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="250">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	He says in the next paragraph, he says:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="251" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;One of the white men said &#039;welcome to South Africa&#039;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="252">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>I take it that these things were happening in the border in South Africa.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="253">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it&#039;s possible that somebody could have said that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="254">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>But you never saw an iron leg put on his feet?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="255">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>No, I can&#039;t remember anything like that.  I cannot recall.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="256">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>What is it that you can recall perhaps?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="257">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I cannot remember anything about the iron cuffs that were placed round his legs.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="258">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>When he was handed over, what was his condition?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="259">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>He moved by himself, he walked in.  It was a clubhouse at the border post and there was nothing apparently wrong with him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="260">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Was he interrogated at that time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="261">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>He was interrogated very shortly in this clubhouse.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="262">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Can you give a rough estimation of the time period?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="263">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I cannot say exactly, but it could have been half an hour or fifteen minutes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="264">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>During the interrogation, was there further assaults on him?  During that interrogation, was he further assaulted?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="265">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he was assaulted.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="266">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Will you please detail that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="267">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;ve already testified that I cannot remember specifically, but I am aware that he was slapped, shoved and he was assaulted in the process.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="268">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Do you remember if his head was hit against the wall?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="269">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I cannot recall that, no.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="270">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Do you remember perhaps that his toes were stepped on?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="271">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I cannot recall that, no.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="272">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>But you were present.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="273">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I was present.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="274">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Were you the most senior officer there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="275">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="276">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Were you in charge of the interrogation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="277">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="278">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Do you know perhaps who was in charge and who was the most senior?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="279">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>It was Gen Stadler and Brig Schoon was present.  They are both my seniors.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="280">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>So from the interrogation was he taken, after your 30 minutes that you have said, was he taken direct to Pretoria?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="281">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is as far as I can recall.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="282">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m asking you because from the report he says that he gave the interrogators information to go and take documents in Mbabane, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="283">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m not aware of that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="284">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>You don&#039;t remember if some documents were brought during his interrogation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="285">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>No, I&#039;m not aware of that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="286">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>What information did he give you during that interrogation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="287">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>He did not say much, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="288">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>The little that he said, what did he say?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="289">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I cannot specifically recall what he said.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="290">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Can you perhaps generally remember what he highlighted ...(indistinct)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="291">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I cannot remember something specific that he said.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="292">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Visser, what did you get from him during that interrogation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="293">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Could you just repeat your question please.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="294">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>During that interrogation, what did you get from him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="295">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I cannot remember that he said anything specifically or pertinently, that is why we transported him to Pretoria, so that he can be interrogated further, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="296">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Was it not part of the plan that he was going to be taken to Pretoria?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="297">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>It was part of the plan, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="298">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>So taking him to Pretoria, it was not because you got nothing, it was part of the plan.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="299">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it was part of the planning that he will be taken to Pretoria.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="300">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>So during your 30 minutes interrogation you got nothing from him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="301">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I cannot remember that he said anything pertinently or that anything came to light.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="302">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Do you perhaps remember what you wanted to get from him at that time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="303">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I believe it would have been - even though I was not personally involved in the interrogation, I believe they wanted to get information concerning planned operations of ANC members in Swaziland.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="304">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>The number of people involved, can you estimate how many were there, including the ones that brought him over the border?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="305">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>There were quite few, it could possibly be six to eight people who at that stage were in the clubhouse, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="306">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>The court case where he testified, when was it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="307">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I can&#039;t remember the date.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="308">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>The year?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="309">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>It was shortly after Malaza walked out as an agent for the ANC, in other words it had to be in the &#039;80s.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="310">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Could it have been later than &#039;89?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="311">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I cannot confirm if it was later or not, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="312">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>When he testified was it after he was released from his abduction and detention?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="313">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it was after he was released and after he was reconciled with his mother.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="314">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Do you know the Regional Court where he appeared?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="315">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>No, I do not know specifically where this court was or which court it was.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="316">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>The people he testified against, do you remember them?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="317">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>The police members who were involved were Mokgabudi and Rabuli, the two members who were involved in the Security Branch in Pretoria.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="318">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Were you present at the court?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="319">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>No, I was not.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="320">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You may proceed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="321">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="322">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Are these the similar police who suspected that Malaza is getting information from him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="323">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, these are the two people who were manipulated by Malaza.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="324">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>In Vlakplaas, do you remember how long did he stay there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="325">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>No, I cannot give specific time spans or periods.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="326">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>May I suggest six months perhaps?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="327">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>At this stage I cannot confirm how long it was.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="328">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>During his stay in Vlakplaas, do you know of the assault and torture that he underwent?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="329">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I would not be able to say.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="330">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>The decision to take him to the Eastern Transvaal, whose was it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="331">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>It was on my request, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="332">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>When was that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="333">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>It was in the &#039;80s, I do not know the specific date.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="334">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Did you make that order 6, 3, 5 months after he was in Vlakplaas?  Time period.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="335">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>He was within the Pretoria area for quite a while and that was afterwards that he was transferred and it was therefore not necessary to do further interrogations myself.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="336">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>During his staying in Vlakplaas, what did your Intelligence department get from him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="337">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>No information was specifically conveyed to me concerning this.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="338">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Then why did you want him to come to the Eastern Transvaal?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="339">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Because he had a relatively senior position within the ANC and he would have been able to provide me with information concerning planning and then to plan an offensive movement.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="340">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Before you recalled him did he break when he was in Vlakplaas?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="341">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>What do you mean when you say &quot;break&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="342">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Did he give vital information?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="343">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>When he was transferred to the Eastern Transvaal he was still not willing to cooperate.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="344">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Just for the record, Mr Interpreter, I should say, &quot;he was to an extent not willing&quot;.  The translation did not exactly correspond with the evidence that was given.  Just for the record.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="345">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="346">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Was it perhaps your thinking that you could get more information from him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="347">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I was convinced that he could have provided important information and that is why I asked Greyling and Visser to attempt to reorientate him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="348">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Was he reorientated?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="349">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he was.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="350">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Did he give you information then?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="351">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>He was then handed over to Gen Buchner who then handled him as an informer, and I had no further - or I received no further reports, specific reports from this General.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="352">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>For how long did he stay in the Eastern Transvaal?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="353">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I cannot specifically recall the dates, but it was for a month or a bit more than a month.  Maybe some of the other members can testify about the time in which he was held there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="354">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m asking you because one of the applicants says he refused to be an informer, he says he never became one, what do you say?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="355">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Initially he refused to become an informant and at a later stage he did decide to become an informant.  That was after a period of time, after a period of reorientation or detention that he conceded.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="356">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>So are you saying prior to his accidental release by Judge Goldstone, he was an informer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="357">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Could you just please repeat your question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="358">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Let me rephrase it.  Did he become an informer prior to his release or after his release?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="359">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>He said he would an informant before he was released.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="360">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>So did he act as an informer during his detention?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="361">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he did convey information to the Security Branch.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="362">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Then why was he not released after you got him where you want him?  After you got him as an informer, why did you not release him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="363">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>After he was willing to cooperate he was released and then he was taken to his home.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="364">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Let me refer you to the similar press conference, the last but one column, the fourth paragraph where he stated that his release was because of him having accidentally met Judge Goldstone, as a detainee.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="365">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>That is not correct, he did meet with Judge Goldstone, but he was then transferred to the Eastern Transvaal where he was released after he was willing to become an informant for the Police, or to cooperate with them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="366">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>He talks of, from the similar press conference, of a Magistrate who visited him, do you know of that visit?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="367">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it was law then that Magistrates could visit detainees.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="368">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Do you remember who that Magistrate was?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="369">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>No, I&#039;m not aware who it was, it was not in my area or district.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="370">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Am I correct, he was visited whilst he was in Pretoria?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="371">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I assume it was Pretoria or the Brits Police Station.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="372">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Was it an internal arrangement of your department to get the Magistrate to visit him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="373">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>No, it was according to law that a Magistrate had to visit the detainee.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="374">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>It strikes me that you don&#039;t remember quite a number of things which, according to the letter I gave to, I think to the Evidence Leader and other legal reps, the family is opposing on the basis that there is none full disclosure of facts known to you, am I correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="375">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>As far as my knowledge goes, I made a full presentation and full disclosure about what happened with this incident.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="376">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I think you should enumerate those, because he has said what he wanted to say and you are just coming and saying there are a number of things which you haven&#039;t disclosed, we don&#039;t know what you&#039;re talking about, and you are also referring to a letter you gave to the Evidence Leader, which we are not privy to.  So we are at a loss of what you are talking about.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="377">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Honourable Chairperson, may I apologise that you have not been placed in possession of that letter, I do believe that my learned colleagues though, do have copies of the letter.  I will hand it up shortly.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="378">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson, I will highlight the things that I talked of, Chairperson.  Starting, Chairperson, with the monitoring.  The applicant cannot say that we had to - it says Mr Visser, or one Visser was in charge ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="379">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>No, I&#039;d rather say you direct the questions, I don&#039;t want to be involved in the debate, I just want you to say what you think he hasn&#039;t disclosed and ask him directly.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="380">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="381">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Visser, save to say that one Visser was observing the interaction of Malaza and Msibi, you talked of other sources which you either have forgotten or you don&#039;t tell us about.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="382">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>At this stage I&#039;d just like to say that statement is not true, Mr Visser said that the information that was provided by other informants, and that was his answer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="383">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Visser, perhaps I didn&#039;t ask it properly, who are those?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="384">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m not capable of giving you the details of other informants that were used at the Security Branch and to give you the details concerning them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="385">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Hence, talking of non full disclosure, it is the view of the family that you know who the informants are, or who your sources are and you are not disclosing them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="386">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>As far as I know the information concerning Msibi and his involvement as handler of Malaza, came from Malaza himself and it was at a later stage confirmed.  But apart from that fact, other informants also brought out reports that resulted us making certain conclusions within the Security Branch.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="387">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Visser, it is also the view of the victims that the assault which Mr Msibi talked of in his press conference, occurred in your presence and you know about it and you are not disclosing it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="388">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m very sorry, that is a mistake, Mr Visser testified about the assault and he was cross-examined about the assault that took place in his presence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="389">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>He was shoved around and he was slapped a few times.  Is that not true?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="390">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it is.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="391">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>When you were asked about, by my learned colleague, about the involvement ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="392">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Sorry Mr Makondo, are you going to be asking him a question on something else and not assault?  I want to ask him a question just on this aspect of the assault.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="393">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>... (indistinct) go on, I&#039;m still on ... (indistinct)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="394">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Mr Visser, as I understand you, you did not personally take part in the assault of this man, did you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="395">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I did not personally partake in it, no.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="396">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Was there any reason why you did not take part?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="397">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I was a senior member, or one of the senior members present and one of the subordinates did interrogate him and then also assaulted him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="398">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Did you take part in the questioning of this man, asking him questions?  Did you take part in that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="399">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I did not personally put questions to him, but some of the members who were present, the Security Branch members, did ask him questions and interrogated him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="400">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Is it your evidence that you do not know, or you do not remember who amongst your colleagues assaulted this man?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="401">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>It could one or more of them.  As I said there were approximately six or eight people in that building, amongst others, de Kock, Col Visser and other members that I cannot even recall at this stage.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="402">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Is there anyone you are able to recall who did not assault this person?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="403">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I did not touch him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="404">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Do you know of anyone amongst your colleagues who were there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="405">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>There were various members, Brig Schoon did not assault him and Gen Stadler did not assault him and there could be one or two more members who did not assault him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="406">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Thank you, Mr Makondo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="407">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>It surprises me that you remember who did not assault him, but you don&#039;t remember who assaulted him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="408">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I remember that Schoon and Stadler were not involved, because we stood together at a certain point within this clubhouse.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="409">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Do I get you correct if you say you were just standing there observing?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="410">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="411">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>And you were the senior members?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="412">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>On of the senior members present, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="413">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Are you saying by implication, it was your subordinates who were assaulting Mr Msibi in your presence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="414">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="415">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>When you were asked about the involvement of Mr de Kock, you said &quot;possibly&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="416">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it&#039;s possible that he could have assaulted him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="417">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>You are not sure as to whether he assaulted him or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="418">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I cannot say out of my own recollection, but if such a question was put to me by his legal representative, I would be able to confirm that it was possible.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="419">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>It&#039;s surprising that you don&#039;t even recall the time period that Mr Msibi was in your detention, when I say &quot;your detention&quot;, I mean your department, whereas you take him as this important person with important information that you need.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="420">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>It is possibly the reason why he was shoved around and slapped, and that is to get urgent information from him within the short period of time that he was with us at the border post.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="421">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I suppose he means when he was eventually brought back to your jurisdiction.  Would I be correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="422">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>That would be correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="423">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>In other words, he means the second time when he was brought to your jurisdiction.  Nelspruit.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="424">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>In the Eastern Transvaal, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="425">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Can you ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="426">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Rephrase it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="427">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m saying I&#039;m surprised that you don&#039;t recall even the time period within which you hand him in under your supervision from your orders to get him to Eastern Transvaal.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="428">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I cannot remember the specific period because I gave the instruction to Visser and Greyling to do the interrogation while I was in Middelburg and he was detained in Witrivier.  All that I could do was that on Sundays I could leave the office and maybe join them there and liaise with them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="429">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Hence I&#039;m saying what you are saying does not correlate with what you said when you described Msibi as this person with information that was highly valuable to your department.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="430">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>But he was, or the position that he held within Swaziland as an Intelligence Officer of the ANC and of the Transvaal machinery, he was of great interest to the Security Branch and to get information from him was very important.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="431">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Visser, I&#039;ve just confirmed this after I asked for the first time from the family members if Mr Msibi ever testified in any court of law, and they said according to their recollection he has not.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="432">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, in order not to waste time, I personally prosecuted Rabuli and Mokgabudi in the Regional Court in Pretoria, and I personally called Mr Msibi as a witness.  If need be we can get hold of that record and make it available.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="433">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The other thing Mr Visser has said is he did not attend the court as well, so your question wouldn&#039;t be relevant, because he wasn&#039;t present.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="434">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="435">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Because according to one of the applicants, when he was killed he was due to appear in Court, that&#039;s what they know, that&#039;s the instruction I got.  Do you know of any court that he was due to appear in?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="436">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m not aware of any specific court, with the exception of the case that Mr Prinsloo has mentioned.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="437">
			<speaker>MR MAKONDO</speaker>
			<text>That will be all, Chairperson, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="438">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR MAKONDO</text>
		</line>
		<line number="439">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Makondo.  Ms Patel?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="440">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Honourable Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="441">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Visser, what was your rank at that stage?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="442">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I was a Brigadier.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="443">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  Because if one refers to Exhibit A ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="444">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Could we just hold ...  Would you need a short adjournment to complete your instruction, it would appear there&#039;s a consultation whilst there&#039;s cross-examination.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="445">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>I ask for pardon, Chairperson, I was just clarifying a thing.  Thank you, there will no need for that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="446">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You may proceed, Ms Patel.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="447">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Honourable Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="448">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Visser, just to take you back to Exhibit A, it appears that Mr Msibi reported there that he was in fact assaulted at what he says looked like a clubhouse, now I would imagine that that&#039;s the brick building that you referred to at the Oshoek border post.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="449">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it is a brick house at the Oshoek border post.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="450">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>He recalls specifically that Capt de Kock, as he was then, assaulted him with fists and a belt and further that he was struck on the head against the wall by Major Visser.  Who would that have been?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="451">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>The only person who had a similar rank who was present there is the current Director Visser who is also one of the applicants in this matter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="452">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Would that be Gert Visser?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="453">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Gert Visser, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="454">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Okay, can you confirm whether this in fact took place?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="455">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I cannot confirm it, but it is possible that it took place, that he was also involved or that he also may have been involved in the assault.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="456">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Right.  Were you present at all times during the interrogation and assault at the Oshoek border house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="457">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I was in that particular building, or at least I was in the clubhouse.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="458">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Were you present at - was he assaulted within your view at all times at the border?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="459">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="460">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Alright.  Then just one curious aspect, Mr de Kock refers in his application at page 32 of bundle 1 to us, that there was some problem between National Intelligence after Msibi was in fact abducted, do you bear any knowledge of this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="461">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I came to hear of this at a certain stage, I heard that National Intelligence had some or other objection regarding the abduction of Msibi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="462">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Do you know what that was about, what the objection related to specifically?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="463">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>The only inference that I could draw at that stage was that they also had an interest in the presence of Msibi in Swaziland.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="464">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>But  you can&#039;t give us any specific information?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="465">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>No, I cannot give you any finer particulars.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="466">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  Furthermore, regarding the R2 000 that was paid, Mr Msibi had stated, according to the report, that that R2 000 was in fact his own money that was taken from his place in Swaziland, can you confirm?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="467">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>That is not correct, Chairperson, this was money which was used by the Security Branch in order to pay him for his continued co-operation with the Security Branch.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="468">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Do you know whether his house was ever searched in Swaziland after his abduction?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="469">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m not personally aware thereof, but it is possible that it may have been searched.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="470">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  During the subsequent interrogation by Greyling and Stadler of Mr Msibi, who would Greyling have reported to?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="471">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>What do you mean?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="472">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>As I understand it, after he was taken back to Daisy farm or Pretoria, he was then handed over to, or Greyling was then involved in his interrogation before he was then handed over further, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="473">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he would have reported to Gen Stadler regarding the interrogation which took place at Daisy.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="474">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  Would Stadler then have reported in turn to you, or informed you at least of the developments that were taking place?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="475">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>He would have brought a report to Head Office.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="476">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>And you would have been privy to those reports?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="477">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it could have happened later that the information may have been made available to me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="478">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Alright.  Honourable Chairperson, if you would just grant me a moment, I just need to check my notes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="479">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Whilst she&#039;s checking her notes, when he was subsequently taken back to the Eastern Transvaal, did you have any contact with Mr Msibi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="480">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I had contact with him, mostly on Sundays I travelled down from Middelburg to Nelspruit, where I would have discussions with him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="481">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Why I&#039;m asking you this, he says in the report, that would be the third column which is an interview that took place after his release in December, he says, the third paragraph</text>
		</line>
		<line number="482" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I wish to indicate that I later learnt that the person who hit me with fists and a belt was Capt de Kock, and the one who struck my head against the wall was Maj Visser, who are both stationed at Nelspruit Police Station.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="483">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Who would that be, the other one, the other Visser?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="484">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s not correct, the Visser is Gert Visser, one of the applicants and Capt de Kock was not stationed at Nelspruit.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="485">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did he at some stage lose consciousness when he was interrogated and resuscitated with five glasses of brandy?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="486">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Not that I am aware of.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="487">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  You may proceed, Ms Patel.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="488">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Honourable Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="489">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Can I just ask, was Mr Schoon present also at all times at the Oshoek border post when Mr Msibi was interrogated and assaulted?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="490">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Brig Schoon was present, as well as Gen Stadler.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="491">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  Thank you, Honourable Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="492">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MS PATEL</text>
		</line>
		<line number="493">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Ms van der Walt, before you re-exam, could I ask my Panel just to complete, so that you do one re-examination?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="494">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>I think that&#039;s correct, thank you Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="495">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Visser, who were the persons under your command, among the applicants that we have here today?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="496">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Gert Visser and Greyling, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="497">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>And if I recall correctly, then you said that Greyling conducted a major proportion of the interrogation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="498">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, and he also assisted in the transportation of Malaza to Pretoria.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="499">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Didn&#039;t you and Mr Greyling subsequently discuss anything regarding what had taken place there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="500">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, we liaised regarding the information which was made available.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="501">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>I actually want to know whether or not you discussed the incident.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="502">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>No, not in detail.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="503">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>So did the entire aspect surrounding the assault never again come to light?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="504">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="505">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>And the other persons with the exception of the senior officers, were they generally known to you or were they simply there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="506">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Most of Col de Kock&#039;s persons were known to me from sight.  I didn&#039;t know all their names, but the other members who were there, such as Greyling and Visser, were personally known to me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="507">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Then just one more question to clarify the picture completely.  Why were there so many senior officers there that night?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="508">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>It was an operation which was planned from Head Office, this action against Msibi, and I believe that to be the reason.  Stadler, among others, was involved with the interrogation of Malaza, the Security Branch member who was the double-agent for the ANC.  That is why he was present there at the Oshoek border post.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="509">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Now where were your interests vested approximately, if one could speak in degrees of importance?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="510">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I was the Commander of the Security Branch in the Eastern Transvaal and I was primarily responsible for combating terrorism which was launched from Swaziland into the RSA.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="511">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>So did you have primary importance there that night?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="512">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I had a primary interest there that night.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="513">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Actually I&#039;m asking you this because it is somewhat strange to me that you recall so little of the details.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="514">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>In what regard, Chairperson?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="515">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Greyling fell directly under your command and so too, Mr Gert Visser.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="516">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="517">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>And Greyling conducted the interrogation that night.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="518">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t know whether he was present at that particular stage or whether he was still in Swaziland, busy on a further operation.  I cannot really recall whether or not he was actually in the clubhouse at that stage.  Visser was indeed there, that I can recall.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="519">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m sorry, then I must have misunderstood the evidence at some point, I thought that Greyling was also involved in the interrogation there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="520">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>He was responsible for the abduction of, or for the transportation of Malaza to Pretoria.  Later after Msibi was transferred to Eastern Transvaal, he received the order from me to continue with the interrogation and the reorientation of the subject.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="521">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>I understand, it&#039;s my mistake.  But Mr Visser was undoubtedly there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="522">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, as far as I know, Gert Visser was present in the clubhouse.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="523">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Can you recall his share in the assault?  He was a member of staff.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="524">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I cannot say precisely, but it is possible that he may have shoved Msibi around.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="525">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="526">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Advocate Sandi, any questions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="527">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, thank you Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="528">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Did I understand you to say you did meet the deceased after he was released?  Your contacts with him, were they after he had been released?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="529">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I did not encounter him again after he was released from police detention.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="530">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Now I understood you to say on Sundays you used to go to Nelspruit.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="531">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="532">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Would you personally have any discussions with him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="533">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I did speak to him on these Sundays, and I assisted him with the reorientation and the recruitment and his process of co-operating with the police.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="534">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Would you be able to say the deceased in the course of the contacts you had with him, would you be able to say whether he conveyed any useful information to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="535">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>As far as I know, he did convey important information and that is also why I asked Buchner to deal with him further as an informer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="536">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Would it have been known to your co-applicants that the deceased was actually co-operating with you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="537">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Could you please repeat the question, I couldn&#039;t hear you quite clearly.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="538">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Your co-applicants, did they know, did any one of them know that the deceased was displaying this positive attitude to the police?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="539">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, they know about it, I believe that some of them may also have been present during his release and would confirm that he was willing to cooperate with the police.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="540">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Perhaps I should have asked this question as follows.  You had this impression that this person was co-operating with you, did you convey that information to any person?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="541">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>He confirmed his willingness to cooperate.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="542">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>What did you do with the information that this man was willing to cooperate?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="543">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>The Branch Commander of Nelspruit may possibly have produced reports and I arrange with Buchner to handle the man as an informer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="544">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Should I understand that to mean you didn&#039;t really see the deceased as someone who deserved to be killed, did you?  On the basis of what you&#039;ve just said.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="545">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Not at all, Chairperson.  I accepted that he was willing to cooperate.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="546">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>And you saw no need that the man should be killed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="547">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I saw no reason for it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="548">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Did you at any stage become aware of what could have happened to him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="549">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I imagine that I heard at a later stage that he had passed away and that he died in Soweto in some or other way, but I don&#039;t know what the circumstances of his death were.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="550">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Where did you get that information from?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="551">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>In discussions with other members of the Security Branch.  I heard that he died in Soweto.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="552">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>You were not particularly interested to know the circumstances in which he has been killed, were you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="553">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I cannot recall that anybody told me precisely what took place.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="554">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Did you know who was his handler at that stage?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="555">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>The last I heard was that the current Gen Buchner would have handled him as an informer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="556">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, but surely if an informer gets killed, for that matter, even if he dies in a car accident, that must be a loss to the Security Police.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="557">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>The moment that I handed him over to Gen Buchner, I did not have any connections or involvement with him.  His handler would have assumed further responsibility for him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="558">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>You did not seek to ascertain from Mr Buchner, his handler, as to what precisely could have happened to this useful informer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="559">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>No, I did not.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="560">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Was there any particular reason why you did not do that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="561">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>No, there is no specific reason.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="562">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Thank you, Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="563">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Advocate Sandi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="564">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Just one question, Mr Visser.  This orientation, you said you wanted to orientate him, in what respect, what did it entail?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="565">
			<speaker>MR S J VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Broadly speaking, it is a discussion with this person or the detainee and you then attempt him to cooperate with the police to provide information in order to prevent any other acts of terror.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="566">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Any re-exam, Ms van der Walt?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="567">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>No questions, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="568">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you very much Mr Visser, you are excused.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="569">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
		<line number="570">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Could we approach the next applicant and take fifteen minutes break.  We shall adjourn for fifteen minutes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="571">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="572">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>ON RESUMPTION</text>
		</line>
		<line number="573">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, I&#039;m calling Mr Gert Visser as the next applicant.</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>