<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY HEARINGS</type>
	<startdate>2000-08-16</startdate>
	<location>PRETORIA</location>
	<day>3</day>
	<names>LEON WILLIAM FLORES</names>
	<case>AM4361/96</case>
						<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=54413&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/2000/200816pt.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="157">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>Mr Flores, can you just give us your full names.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>LEON WILLIAM JOHN FLORES</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>The applicant is duly sworn, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Advocate Bosman.  Mr Cornelius?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Flores, you&#039;re an applicant in this specific amnesty application, you properly prepared the amnesty application and filed it with the Cape Town office, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>You were a member of C-Section of the Police, called Vlakplaas, in what rank?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>A Sergeant.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>You received an instruction - pardon, Mr Chairman, your application is as referred to in the bundle of documents, starting at folio 53, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>I do, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>More specifically on page 85, you give the merits of this specific application of yours, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Could you shortly give a resume of what happened.  You received instructions, and what happened then?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, I can&#039;t recall the specific date and time, but I was called to the office at Vlakplaas, by Mr de Kock.  Present with Mr de Kock was Mr Bosch and Mr Japie Kok and together with myself was Mr Chris Magopa, one of the askaris, an ex-PAC member.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr de Kock then just told us that he had a, like a mission for us to do, we had to deliver a parcel off at Swaziland.  Steve Bosch then gave us a rundown of how the Parker pen worked, due to the fact that before sealing the Parker pen package-wise, I had to activate the first trigger mechanism of the Parker pen, by extracting a piece of dental floss till it cannot go any further and then cut it off flush with the box and then wrap the last piece of that where upon that I had to ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Can you just hold it one second.  Mr Bosch explained that the package was wrapped on all sides except the one side which a little flap was kept open with the dental floss coming out, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>Correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Right.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>On conclusion of the explanation to us, Chris Magopa and myself then left for Swaziland.  We entered through Mahamba border post, which is near Piet Retief, and travelled towards Manzini.  I estimate at about five kilometres before reaching Manzini we stopped.  That&#039;s when I did the procedures by pulling out the dental floss, cutting it flush with the box, taping the wrapping closed.  Listening to the other gentlemen&#039;s statements, I was under the impression I did bring in the address or ...(indistinct) the address, addressed to the Swaziland Council of Churches.  I could be mistaken there as other evidence was led now.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Were you given the address on a piece of paper or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>Yes, yes, I was given the address.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Who gave that to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>Steve Bosch, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>And you kept that with you at all times?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>You didn&#039;t have other letters or documentation with you that you could have become confused with the address?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>No, not at that stage, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>It is possible that you might be confusing the Swaziland Council of Churches with another operation where you had to deliver a letter like testified by Mr de Kock?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>Yes, once Mr de Kock mentioned that, which was an incident performed by Military Intelligence if I&#039;m not mistaken, it did ring a bell.  I could be confusing it, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>You agree it will be nonsensical to send it to a broad Council of Churches?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s for definite.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>What happened then after you activated the bomb and you put the adhesive tape on, what did you do?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>We then drove, I drove towards Manzini, I parked roughly about a block away, Mr Chairperson, from the Manzini Post Office, where I then handed over the parcel to Chris Magopa, who then in his turn went and posted it to the addressee.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	We then returned back to Vlakplaas.  Mr Chairperson, it would be between six months to year nothing was reported on the incident of the parcel, then I heard, I can&#039;t say from who I heard, but on the farm from someone I heard that the parcel had been collected by one of the post office employees, it was opened and it detonated and apparently the person opening it had lost a finger or two or a hand, I&#039;m not sure.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Did you at the time realise you were committing an offence by posting an explosive device?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>At that time, no Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>You knew it was illegal to post explosive devices?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>Yes, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>And you at all times acted within the course and scope of your duties and in the execution of your instructions from a superior officer, Mr de Kock?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Did you work on a need-to-know basis?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>I did, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Did you enquire about the reason why you had to send it to this address or anything of that nature?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>Not at all, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Did you accept that there was a political decision made by your seniors?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>I did, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Did you at all times act in the interests of your country?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>I did, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Did you have any personal hate of this addressed victim?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>Nothing whatsoever, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Did you receive any bonus of any nature whatsoever to commit this deed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>Nothing, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>You just received your normal salary as envisaged by the Act?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>You&#039;re applying for amnesty in this matter for conspiracy to commit murder in Swaziland, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>You&#039;re also applying for amnesty for defeating the ends of justice, because you didn&#039;t disclose anything when you came back to the Republic.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="61">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="62">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>And you are also asking for amnesty for all possible offences under the Explosives Act, which are numerous, the transportation of illegal explosives, the crossing of the border with explosives an so forth, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="63">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="64">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Lastly, when you crossed the border, did you cross the border legally or illegally?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="65">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>Legally, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="66">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>With a passport?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="67">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>With a passport.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="68">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>In other words, your own passport?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="69">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>My own passport, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="70">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Not a forged passport?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="71">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>Not that I can recall, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="72">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>I take it that on the basis of what you&#039;ve just said you still have the same passport?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="73">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>I beg your pardon?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="74">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>Is this the same - this passport you&#039;re talking about, is it the same passport you used on the day in question?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="75">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>It must have expired.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="76">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>No, no, no, Mr Chairperson, no, that one has totally lapsed already.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="77">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="78">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR CORNELIUS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="79">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Cornelius.  Mr Hugo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="80">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR HUGO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="81">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Flores, please correct me if I&#039;m wrong, but did Mr de Kock at any stage when you were called in initially, tell you that this particular explosive device was to be sent to Swaziland, more specifically for attention of the ANC?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="82">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>It is possible, ja, it is possible, but I cannot recall it as such.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="83">
			<speaker>MR HUGO</speaker>
			<text>You just can&#039;t recall that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="84">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="85">
			<speaker>MR HUGO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="86">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR HUGO</text>
		</line>
		<line number="87">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Mr Lamey?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="88">
			<speaker>MR LAMEY</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson, I&#039;ve got no questions to this witness, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="89">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR LAMEY</text>
		</line>
		<line number="90">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Thank you, Mr Chair, just one question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="91">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Flores, you don&#039;t have any technical background regarding the building of bombs and explosive devices, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="92">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>Nothing whatsoever, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="93">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>So your evidence you wouldn&#039;t describe as the evidence of a specialist or an expert?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="94">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>Not at all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="95">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>It&#039;s just how you perceived what happened?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="96">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="97">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="98">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR VAN DER MERWE</text>
		</line>
		<line number="99">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr van der Merwe.  Ms Patel?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="100">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Honourable Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="101">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Flores, there&#039;s this other incident that you say you might have confused this specific incident that we are dealing with now, can you give us a bit of information about that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="102">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, I can&#039;t elaborate on that.  If I say I recall such an incident, in those years we used to have a component called Trevits, which was like an office desk who did the counter-revolutionary acts or all information, whether it was from National Intelligence, Military Intelligence or the Police as such, the Security Branch, where they evaluated the stuff and we&#039;d get reports and at that stage at Vlakplaas, I worked in the Swaziland/Eastern Transvaal area with Chris Magopa, so all incidents regarding Swaziland as a whole, would come to my attention, I would peruse through those circulars as such and I think one of those I recall that there was such an instance, but I cannot elaborate on that as such.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="103">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>So bar the fact that the name rings a bell, the Swaziland Council of Churches, you can&#039;t recall what specific information there might have been around that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="104">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>Not at all, no, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="105">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Or whether an operation was launched against them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="106">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>Nothing in specific detail, no.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="107">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  How many other incidents were you involved in, of a similar nature, where you had to drop off a parcel to be posted to another place?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="108">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I&#039;ve posted many pieces in Swaziland, plain letters just to DLBs and that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="109">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>But where we&#039;re dealing with an explosive of this nature, how many other parcels were you involved in posting?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="110">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>This was the first one.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="111">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  So it would be very difficult to confuse this with any other incident then, of a similar nature?    Given that  it&#039;s the only incident that you were involved in.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="112">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, yes, the package as such, but I could be confused with the address as such.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="113">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  Sorry Honourable Chairperson, grant me a moment.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="114">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Besides the fact that you might have confused the question of whether it was addressed to the Swaziland Council of Churches, can you recollect whether a specific person&#039;s name was on the envelope or the parcel?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="115">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>In my application I didn&#039;t mention it, Mr Chairperson, but when the others testified, the other applicants testified now, it did ring a bell, so there is a possibility there was, I did bring on a specific name plus the address.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="116">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>But you don&#039;t have any independent recollection of that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="117">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>I beg your pardon?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="118">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>You don&#039;t have an independent recollection?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="119">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>No, not at all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="120">
			<speaker>MS PATEL</speaker>
			<text>Alright.  Thank you, Honourable Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="121">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MS PATEL</text>
		</line>
		<line number="122">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Ms Patel.  Advocate Bosman?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="123">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text>I have no questions, thank you Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="124">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Advocate Sandi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="125">
			<speaker>ADV SANDI</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t have a question, thank you Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="126">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Flores, you testified that you heard that it exploded, it was not claimed and it exploded in a toilet, do you recall your evidence in that respect?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="127">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="128">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I see on page 86 of the annexure to your application you say</text>
		</line>
		<line number="129" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;We received information&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="130">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>That would probably be the third paragraph from the bottom.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="131">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m with you, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="132">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So you heard, you never received it because there should be a difference between the two?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="133">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>Yes, well what I was trying to emphasise there, I beg your pardon, is that it was brought under my attention that we did hear that, I don&#039;t know from where it came, that there was an explosion.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="134">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>When you say</text>
		</line>
		<line number="135" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;It was further reported that the man lost one arm&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="136">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>would it be similar to what you&#039;ve heard?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="137">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="138">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And then the last paragraph is intriguing, that</text>
		</line>
		<line number="139" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;On enquiry it was found&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="140">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>What are you referring to there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="141">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>Well what I tried to state there, Mr Chairperson, was I presume that Mr Pienaar at Piet Retief or one of the other members who worked the Swazi area more frequently than we did, obviously had to enquire what happened at the, if it was our parcel or what, seeing that it was gone for such a long time, and I think I tried to reflect here that on the enquiry.  I can&#039;t specifically say it was my enquiry or whose it was.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="142">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>This pen holder, how many pens were inside, did you look?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="143">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>I didn&#039;t open it, not at all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="144">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>How do you know that there was a brand new Parker pen then?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="145">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>It was told to me that it was a Parker pen set.  Col de Kock will never use second-hand stuff, he will always buy the best and new ones, for any operations.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="146">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Even if when he was out of pocket he would still go for the new ones?  Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="147">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="148">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Any re-exam, Mr Cornelius?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="149">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>I have none, thank you Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="150">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO RE-EXAMINATION BY MR CORNELIUS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="151">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Flores, you are excused.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="152">
			<speaker>MR FLORES</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="153">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
		<line number="154">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Any other evidence in support of Mr Flores, Mr Cornelius?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="155">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>I have no other evidence, thank you Judge, that concludes ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="156">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>That closes the application of Mr Flores.  Thank you very much.  Mr van der Merwe, who are you calling first?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="157">
			<speaker>MR VAN DER MERWE</speaker>
			<text>I am calling Mr du Toit.</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>