<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY HEARINGS</type>
	<startdate>2000-10-12</startdate>
	<location>JOHANNESBURG</location>
	<day>2</day>
								<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=54546&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/2000/201012jb.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="1149">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>CHAIRPERSON:   Good morning everybody.  Today is the 12th October 2000, and it&#039;s the continuation of the applications of Antonie Jagga and three others.  Mr Jantjie was still testifying and he was under cross-examination.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>LESIZI MICHAEL JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>(s.u.o.)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Koopedi, you were busy cross-examining, may you proceed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>(cont)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Jantjie, when you were making your trips into Lesotho, almost on a daily basis as you say, were you using different cars, were you using the same cars?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, we were using two cars.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>So it&#039;s only two cars that you used?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson, as far as I can recall.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Would you be able to remember whether the car you used to go and fetch Betty, is the same car that was used when you went to fetch Nomasonto?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson, we used the same car.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Now what I need to understand is, your taking of Betty was supposed to look like an abduction, now what why would you use the same car, the car in which you abducted Betty, to go and fetch Nomasonto?  Didn&#039;t you think that would cause suspicion?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I think I said that we used two different cars to fetch Betty and Nomasonto.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>No, you said that they were the same car.  That was your evidence.  He asked you</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Did you use different cars to do this?&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>you said yes, you used two cars.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>then he said: </text>
		</line>
		<line number="18" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Was the car that you used to fetch Betty, the same as the car that you used to fetch Nomasonto?&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>you said:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Yes.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I said I think they were two different cars.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Well that&#039;s not what we heard.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I said they were two different cars.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s not what you said, but ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Was there a translation problem, Mr Interpreter?  Sorry, I&#039;m speaking to you, Mr Interpreter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker>INTERPRETER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson, I think we used the same car and I think Mr Brian Koopedi did hear that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>The Interpreter is right, because at that time I didn&#039;t have my headphones on so I was listening directly to his responses in Sesotho, and the response was</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;We used the same car.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>I will pass that point, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Now you told this Honourable Committee that initially yourself and Mr Jagga masqueraded yourselves as criminals, you again masqueraded yourselves as MK combatants.  You again conduct a this abduction, didn&#039;t you think this sounds strange?  How can you have the same people in the same vicinity, dealing with the same people, appearing in different versions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson, to us it was not surprising because that was per arrangement that we made beforehand.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Could you listen to the question now.  You are answering to the abduction, he&#039;s stating to you that at first when you approached Betty Boom - or rather, if I follow you correctly Mr Koopedi, you say the first time they approached Betty Boom?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s right and said they were criminals, criminals from South Africa.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Criminals who ran away from South Africa.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>That is so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And wanted refuge in Lesotho, and secondly, you then said you were MK members and thereafter you conducted the abduction, understand it in that context.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I do understand, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Could you now - I think your response is, if I&#039;m not mistaken, ...(indistinct) on the ...(indistinct) question, was it not strange?  If I&#039;m not wrong.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is what I said, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, do allow me to intervene by saying that the evidence was not that they told Betty Boom that they were criminals, the evidence as I understood it was, I think ...(indistinct) they used two types of masquerades, the one when they went to the bars where people were drinking, they used that and also they told other people ...(indistinct - no microphone) that they were MKs.  But I didn&#039;t understand the evidence to be that they told Betty both those.  Perhaps that can just be cleared.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Ja, I think that should be cleared, because they at first went to bars where they would be known as criminals.  But clear it up, what actually happened when they eventually approached Betty.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  Let me as the question this way.  Did you tell Betty that you were criminals who were seeking refuge in Maseru or in Lesotho?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  Now when you gave evidence - or maybe let me say this, you said that Betty phoned Tax Sejanamane, arranged that you will come and pick him up, even told Tax the type of car you&#039;ll be driving in.  Did I hear you correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Now I seem to understand your statement - which is on page 11 of the bundle of documents, Chairperson, the first paragraph, to say that the minute, that is when you were with Tax, you found him and you then asked him to accompany you to the Republic, and the minute you mentioned Betty&#039;s name, he relaxed and he came voluntarily with you.  Why would you need to mention Betty&#039;s name if in fact there is a pre-arrangement that you will be coming to pick him up?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>It was just to make certain to him that we were the people that Betty told him about.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Now what do you mean when you say - I&#039;ll read it in Afrikaans</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;He relaxed&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Was he not relaxed before you mentioned Betty&#039;s name?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, because he did not know us I would say he was not relaxed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  What happened when you crossed the border with Tax, did you at this time produce any passports, or did you just pass as you normally do without being asked any uncomfortable questions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson, we used the same method as before, like we did when we went to fetch Betty and Nomasonto.  We were not asked any questions and we were not asked about the person who was accompanying us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>And this did not worry Tax, the fact that you are able to pass through borders without being asked for passports?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Did you have to tell Tax who you were?  Did you tell Tax whether you were MKs sent by Betty, or you didn&#039;t have to say anything, you just had to say: &quot;Betty sent us to pick you up&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is what we said, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>What did you say, did you tell Tax that you were MK people, or you did not tell him that you were MK people?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson, we did not tell him that we were members of the MK.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="61">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Now I want you to - perhaps this is asking for your opinion, I want you to tell me whether  - we did not raise anybody&#039;s suspicion and in particular an MK member who is in Lesotho who has run away from South Africa, would this person not to be worried to be accompanied by people who would just cross the border without being asked questions, without him also producing a passport?  Didn&#039;t you think this would have worried anybody, any normal person?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="62">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson, I think he should have suspected, but he would also think that these people have already made arrangements before with the people in Lesotho and the people in the Republic of South Africa.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="63">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Sorry Mr Koopedi, can I just interpose here.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="64">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	What did you tell him, who you were?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="65">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>We explained to him that we are the people who were sent by Betty, as per arrangements they have made with Betty.  So we crossed the border from Lesotho into the Republic of South Africa, straight to the farm.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="66">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>But here&#039;s an MK guy confronted by two whites and two blacks and he just accepts your word for it, he&#039;s not suspicious at all, you just mention her name and it&#039;s like a magic wand, he just comes with you.  Is that how it happened?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="67">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson, that is how it happened.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="68">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Without further introduction, other than that &quot;we are the people Betty spoke about&quot;?  Just that &quot;Betty said we should fetch you&quot; and that&#039;s it, you don&#039;t make any further identification?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="69">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="70">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Had you arranged the specific time and place at which you would collect him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="71">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="72">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>So he was waiting there for a specific vehicle to come at a specific time to a specific place?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="73">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="74">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Okay, let&#039;s go back to Nomasonto, there&#039;s something I need to clear.  You did not phone her, there was no pre-arrangement that would be coming for her, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="75">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="76">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Now you had a day or so ago abducted Betty, and the intention was to make sure that people would see it as an abduction, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="77">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="78">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Now why would then Nomasonto listen to you when you are the people who abducted in daylight, when people could be seeing you abducting Betty, why would Nomasonto listen to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="79">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>It is because, Chairperson, we went to Nomasonto with the messages that we got from Betty.  We said to her: &quot;Betty said we should come collect you&quot;, and when she heard that we know Betty, she did not have any problem to go with us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="80">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>You didn&#039;t just say: &quot;Betty said we must come and fetch you&quot;, you said to her: &quot;Betty said we must come and fetch you to Ladybrand&quot;.  And not only must you fetch her to Ladybrand, but you take her child with.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="81">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>No, she decided about the child.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="82">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Yes, but - whichever way, she now takes the child with to go and see Betty in South Africa.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="83">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="84">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>And then you went through the border and there was nobody stopping you, she didn&#039;t get suspicious about that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="85">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson, she did not suspect anything and nobody stopped us at the border.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="86">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>So nobody wanted to see her travel document, to see the child&#039;s travel document?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="87">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="88">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Where did you find Nomasonto?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="89">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>We found her at a place called Ditabaneng.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="90">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Was it at a house, a flat, a hotel?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="91">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>It was at a flat, because there was a cluster of flats there, she was renting a flat there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="92">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>Excuse me, Mr Koopedi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="93">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	If, when you took Betty away, you made it appear to be an abduction, the word would have spread around Maseru and especially to the people close to Betty, that she had been abducted, how do you expect Nomasonto not to know about that, as much as Tax?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="94">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson, we expected that they did not know.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="95">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>But your intention when you took Betty, you wanted that any person who sees that or heard about that, should understand that she has been abducted, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="96">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="97">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Isn&#039;t it so that you actually wanted them to?  You wanted them to know that she&#039;d been abducted, that was the whole object of the exercise.  You confirmed that the last time ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="98">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="99">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Now you are now at the farm with Nomasonto, what was said to her that made her agree to work for you?  What was given to her?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="100">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>We had already arranged with Betty, and our agreement was that Betty would try to convince her to work with us because Betty had already agreed to work with us.  In other words, what I&#039;m saying is that we were using Betty, so that she could be able to convince these other people that came after her.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="101">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>But what I want to know is, what was it that was said to Nomasonto, or even Tax?  What was it that was said to them by Betty, that made them agree to work for you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="102">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>When we arrived at the farm we explained ourselves to these people, we told them that we were working for the South African Police, in the Security Branch.  So we asked that we should use them against the organisation that they belonged to, that is the ANC, so that we could be able to get information about the activities of that organisation in the Republic of South Africa.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="103">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>When Betty eventually spoke to them, were you present when she did that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="104">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson, I was present and Tony Jagga was present.  Sometimes one of us will go outside and the other one will remain inside and listen.  So I would say I was present.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="105">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>And you were present just to make sure they didn&#039;t hatch some plot against you, isn&#039;t that so?  You didn&#039;t exactly trust them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="106">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Not that we did not trust them Chairperson, because we have agreed that we will use Betty to recruit these people.  So it was important for us that one of us should be present when Betty speaks to these people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="107">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Why was it important that one of you should be there?  If you trusted her, why did you have to be there at all?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="108">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I would say we trusted Betty because we had met with her on several occasions before, but because myself and Tony were involved in this recruitment exercise, it was important that one of us should be present.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="109">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Why?  That&#039;s what I&#039;m asking you and you can&#039;t give me an explanation.  Surely it would have been easier to leave them together, so Betty could convince them and then bring them to you?  They knew her, they trusted her, they didn&#039;t you at all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="110">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson, I do not agree with you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="111">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>What do you mean you don&#039;t agree with me?  Did they know you?  Did Nomasonto know you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="112">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, she did not know us, it was for the first time that she saw us when we went to collect her.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="113">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  And did Tax know you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="114">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson, he did not know us, it was for the first time that he saw us that day.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="115">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>So again, why was it necessary for one of you to be present while they were talking?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="116">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>One of us, or both of us should be present because we had already started discussions with them.  It would be difficult for us if we did not know how the discussions between them and Betty went.  So it was important that we both - or one of us is present.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="117">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Yes, you wanted to be sure, amongst other things,  that Betty wasn&#039;t playing a double game with you, that she wasn&#039;t working a plan so that these guys would be safe.  Isn&#039;t that part of why you wanted to listen to what was being said?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="118">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, we were already trusting Betty, so we did not suspect that she would turn against us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="119">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>So that didn&#039;t even enter your mind?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="120">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But do you recall saying that the reason why Betty was, or rather the abduction of Betty was because she was already suspected by her colleagues?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="121">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I do remember, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="122">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And wouldn&#039;t it make sense that when Betty was speaking to the others who you later fetched from Lesotho, that whilst she was speaking to them, you had to be present?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="123">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>It could be so, Chairperson, but I would say we did not know anything about those people that we have fetched after Betty.  For example, we did not know whether Nomasonto knew how Betty was taken from Lesotho.  I would agree with you Chairperson, in that it could be one of the reasons why we should be present, or one of us should be present during the discussion.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="124">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You may proceed, Mr Koopedi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="125">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="126">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	This flat where you fetched Nomasonto, what was the access like to the residence, do you have to pass through a gate, do you pass through securities, what was the access like?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="127">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>The place where Nomasonto stayed, Chairperson, there were about 10 flats there and there was a fence, a security fence which was more than six metres high and there was also a gate.  There was only gate, one big gate which was used by the cars.  So when we arrived there that gate was not closed and it was not manned by security.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="128">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>What time was it, what time of day was it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="129">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>It could be between 10 o&#039;clock in the morning and 12 o&#039;clock midday.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="130">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>And what time was it when you abducted Betty?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="131">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I think it was after 5 o&#039;clock, although I do not recall precisely, but it could have been 5 o&#039;clock in the afternoon.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="132">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>All this was done during the day, am I correct?  All the abductions and the fetchings were done during the day, broad daylight.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="133">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I would say we fetched Betty after 5 o&#039;clock.  Well I don&#039;t remember whether it was 6p.m. or not.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="134">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Was it dark when you fetched Betty?  When you abducted her, was it dark?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="135">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>It was not yet dark, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="136">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>It&#039;s summer, Mr Koopedi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="137">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson, there might have been clouds and the place ...(indistinct)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="138">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Who was with Nomasonto?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="139">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I think when we arrived there it was only her and the child.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="140">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Were there any people moving around in those flats?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="141">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I would say so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="142">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  Now when you then talked to Nomasonto, what did you say to her, who did you say you are?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="143">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I don&#039;t remember whether I explained my name to them, but I am not saying that I introduced myself as somebody else to them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="144">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  But then you still ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="145">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, who&#039;s them?  You said you&#039;re not sure if you introduced yourself to them.  I thought it was just Nomasonto and a baby.  You can&#039;t introduce yourself to a baby, so who is the other person that you introduced yourself to, the people?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="146">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I was referring to all these people that we went to fetch in Lesotho.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="147">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>But we&#039;re talking about a specific instance of fetching Nomasonto here, we&#039;re not talking about the others at the moment.  He&#039;s asking you what did you say to her, not what did you say to them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="148">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Well Chairperson, I don&#039;t remember the name that I used.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="149">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>You haven&#039;t answered my question.  Why do you use the plural when we&#039;re talking about one person?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="150">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, at that time I was including Betty, Tax Sejanamane and Nomasonto.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="151">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>But you&#039;ve just been asked if there were other people present and you&#039;ve just said</text>
		</line>
		<line number="152" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Yes, there were people in the flats, but she was just herself and the child&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="153">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>and then:  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="154" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;What did you say to her?&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="155">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Just please concentrate if you&#039;re going to answer the question, otherwise we&#039;ll get this confusion again and again.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="156">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Now you may not recall whether you gave Nomasonto any name or not, but what I want to know is, who did you say you were, where did you come from?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="157">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>We told Nomasonto that we were sent by Betty to come and fetch her.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="158">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>You didn&#039;t tell her who you were, where did you come from, whether you were MK, whether you were criminals?  You didn&#039;t tell her any of those things?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="159">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson, we did not tell her.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="160">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>And she didn&#039;t want to know any of those?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="161">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="162">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>What strikes me as strange is that it seems Betty&#039;s name was a magic wand, you say to Nomasonto, a member of Betty&#039;s cell, Betty who has just been abducted a few days ago, a day or two ago, you go to Nomasonto, you are the same abductors of her Commander, you just mention Betty&#039;s name, voila, she comes with you, she even takes her child.  Don&#039;t you think that is strange?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="163">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson, it doesn&#039;t seem strange to me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="164">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>And the same thing can be said of the fetching of Tax, you mention Betty&#039;s name, this is perhaps three or more days thereafter, Betty&#039;s disappearance has got to be known, it&#039;s actually not a disappearance, an abduction which was done during daylight, but you just said to Tax: &quot;Now we are sent by Betty&quot;, and voila, he agrees to go with you.  Do you think that&#039;s not strange?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="165">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, it doesn&#039;t seem strange to me, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="166">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Well my instructions are to put to you that your version is a fabrication, it&#039;s not true.  And to tell you why I put this to you, Betty Boom was a highly trained MK cadre, she was a Commander of a cell, within that cell she commanded highly trained MK soldiers, but you come before this Committee and say that this highly trained MK cadre, member of the SACP and also a person who sits on the Central Committee of the SACP, you&#039;ve only paid, according to your version, you&#039;ve only paid her two times and amounts not more than R250, and for that she betrayed herself, sold out comrades in Cape Town, sold out the operations in Cape Town, sold out the operations in the Free State, and it is on these basis that I&#039;m instructed to put to you that your version is not true, it&#039;s not correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="167">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson, they are not correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="168">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m not sure what is not correct, your version?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="169">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, are you saying that his clients are not correct in saying that your version is not correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="170">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>...(no translation)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="171">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Koopedi, that was a little compound, could you break it down so that when he responds we get precisely what he&#039;s responding to.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="172">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  I&#039;ll just put this to you, that your version is incorrect on the basis of the little profile that I&#039;ve given you of Betty and what you gave to Betty to buy her.  My instructions are that your version is incorrect and it is in fact an insult to the intelligence of Betty.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="173">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I am saying I&#039;m telling the truth here.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="174">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did you know this profile that for instance, you knew that she was the Commander?  Did you know how the others were trained?  That is Tax and Nomasonto.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="175">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, we did know, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="176">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did you know that she was also a member of the South African Communist Party, that is Betty Boom?  Did you know that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="177">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, we did not know that, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="178">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did you know that she was sitting on the High Command of - I mean the Central Committee of the ANC?  Did you know that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="179">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, we did not know, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="180">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Oh, I beg your pardon, SACP, not ANC.  SACP.  Did you know that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="181">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>No, you were right the first time.  It was specifically put &quot;the ANC&quot;, by my learned friend.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="182">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>No, SACP.  Mr Lax corrected me, I thought I heard ANC, but ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="183">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m quite sure that what was spoken about by Mr Koopedi when he divided his question up he said</text>
		</line>
		<line number="184" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I&#039;m not talking about MK, I&#039;m talking about the ANC&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="185">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>then he said:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="186" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;And then, do you know what her position was in MK?&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="187">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>I think you were correct, Chairperson, and Mr Lax, with great respect, was wrong.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="188">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Ja, that&#039;s what I heard.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="189">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>And perhaps for clarification, the ANC in its structures does not have anything called a Central Committee or a Central Command, that&#039;s the SACP ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="190">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>No, no, I supposed to avoid argument let&#039;s restate it, it might be just a slip of the lips, not the tongue.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="191">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>My attorney agrees with Mr Lax.  I&#039;m sorry if I&#039;m wrong, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="192">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Tell me about this farm, where is this farm exactly, you said it&#039;s some 20 kilometres from Ladybrand, but where?  If I want to go to that farm, how do I go there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="193">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, from Ladybrand using the main road to Clocolan, it can be about 15 to 16 kilometres from Ladybrand towards Clocolan.  There is a farm there on the right side and you turn there and then from there you travel about six kilometres and that farm is in that area.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="194">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Do you know the name of that farm?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="195">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, I don&#039;t know the name of that farm, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="196">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Do you know the Erf number or any number of that farm?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="197">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="198">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>When last were you at this farm?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="199">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That was in 1987, Chairperson, in December.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="200">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>How long had you worked at this farm?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="201">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>We worked at that farm when we went there with Betty Boom for the first time and we stopped going to that farm when we took them back to Lesotho.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="202">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>So you were actually there for a short while?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="203">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="204">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Now what I need to understand, and perhaps finally on the Betty Boom issue, why would you then return Betty Boom to Lesotho when initially you abducted her because she might not be safe?  Why would you then return her to Lesotho?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="205">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>It is because we had already finished recruiting the other people, the people that she gave their names to us and we went to fetch them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="206">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>But no, you abducted Betty because she would be suspected by the ANC that she&#039;s working for you, is that not correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="207">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="208">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>A few days thereafter, perhaps within a week, you return her to Lesotho, does that not defeat the purpose, the initial purpose of taking her away?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="209">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Taking her back.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="210">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Taking her back, yes.  Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="211">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, we were satisfied that there were no longer suspicions and we could not get any piece of information that people knew that Betty was with us, that is why we took her back to Lesotho.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="212">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>You were satisfied that?  I missed that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="213">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>We were already satisfied that there was nothing or any information that we could get that indicated that people knew that Betty was working with us, that is why we returned her to Lesotho.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="214">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>What satisfied you?  You need to have received some information I believe, that no, no, in fact Betty&#039;s okay.  What satisfied you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="215">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>We were satisfied because we couldn&#039;t hear anything that indicated that people know that Betty was working with us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="216">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>What do you mean by that?  What information?  What are you talking about?  That&#039;s the question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="217">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I am saying that because our informers will come to us and tell us that it is known that Betty is working with us, but because we didn&#039;t get that information from our informers, we became satisfied that there were no suspicions that Betty was with us or was working with us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="218">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>But your informers had already told you that, not so?  Were you not told by your informers that Betty is hot, Betty is suspected that she&#039;s working with you, and that is why you abducted her?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="219">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="220">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Can I just ask something?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="221">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	How would your informers know that they should come and tell you that there were suspicions that Betty was - now this is after the abduction, you understand?  How would your informers know after her abduction to come and tell you well, there&#039;s still suspicions or there are no suspicions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="222">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>The informer who gave us information about Betty stayed at the same place where Betty was staying, so we expected that if there was something else that he has heard at that place, he would come to us and tell us so that we could take some action.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="223">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Well how could he come to you, you were at the farm with these people?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="224">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>He could call our office and give somebody information there at the office, then we will make an arrangement to meet him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="225">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>And so because your informer didn&#039;t tell you there were any further suspicions or didn&#039;t make any effort to contact you, you made the assumption that there were no longer any suspicions against Betty?  Do I understand you correctly?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="226">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="227">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>And that&#039;s why you went and dropped her in a public place with the others?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="228">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="229">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>You sat with Betty for some time, together with Nomasonto and Tax, and I believe this will be a fair question to ask, did Nomasonto and Tax belong to other units, or did they only belong to Betty&#039;s unit?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="230">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="231">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>They belonged to other units?  Is that what you&#039;re saying?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="232">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>They were in Betty&#039;s unit, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="233">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>As far as you knew they did not belong to other units?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="234">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="235">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Now my question is, why would you want to recruit Nomasonto and Tax, because they belong in Betty&#039;s unit and they don&#039;t belong in any other units?  What value would they add?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="236">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>We wanted to get information from all the people in Betty&#039;s unit.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="237">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>What information did you expect to get from them, other than information about the unit&#039;s activities?  What did information did you expect to get, for instance, from Tax and Nomasonto?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="238">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>The information that we expected from them was in as far as the infiltrations from Lesotho were concerned into the Republic of South Africa.  Those were the infiltrations that were undertaken by the MK soldiers from Lesotho.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="239">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>What you&#039;re saying is that you expected Tax and Nomasonto to have information that Betty did not have, am I correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="240">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that was our suspicion, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="241">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  Let&#039;s talk about Mbulelo.  What led you to Mbulelo Ngono?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="242">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>We were trying to recruit him so that we can get information as well from him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="243">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>No, the question was, what led you to him?  What drew him to your attention?  That was the question, not what information did you want, or what your object was.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="244">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>We learnt about him in Maseru and we became interested in him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="245">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Who told you about Mbulelo Ngono?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="246">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>We were told by our informer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="247">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Who is this informer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="248">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>;   Chairperson, are we going to go through that again, with great respect.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="249">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Ja, he stated that he wouldn&#039;t divulge those informers, so I don&#039;t think we&#039;ll get anywhere Mr Koopedi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="250">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Well he stated in the matter of Betty, it was not clear to me that he&#039;s going to throughout refuse divulging informers, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="251">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>No, he&#039;s initial testimony was that he will reveal these four, that is Betty, Nomasonto, Tax and Mbulelo, the other informers he would not tell you about, for security reasons.  That&#039;s his evidence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="252">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="253">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	You say that after you had heard about Mbulelo, you then discussed the plan with your superior and your co-applicant, Mr Robertshaw and you were told that you should go and recruit this person, am I correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="254">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="255">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Now on your way to Roma, that is you and Thulo, decided that no, we don&#039;t want to recruit this person but rather to take him the other way round.  Why this decision?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="256">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>It is because we realised that the method that we used at the farm was the easiest method, so that is why we decided that we should go and approach the Lesotho Police so that they could help us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="257">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>No, the method you used previously did not include using the Lesotho Police, and perhaps I will come to that.  What I want to know is, your instructions were to go and recruit this person and according to your evidence you said on your way to Roma, you decided not to recruit but to go to the Roma police, now what I want to know is, what made you go for this decision?  Why did you change from the instruction given?  You were instructed to go and recruit, but you turn around and say no, we don&#039;t want to recruit.  What made you change?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="258">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>It is because we realised that the method that we used at the farm would be the easiest one that we could use to recruit Ngono from Lesotho.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="259">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Now did you - before going to the Lesotho Police, did you go back to Mr Robertshaw to tell him that: &quot;We don&#039;t want to follow your instructions anymore, but we want to take another route&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="260">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="261">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Am I then correct to say that from the moment you decided not to go according to instructions, you were acting on your own, you were acting contrary to your instructions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="262">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>You are correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="263">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Okay. Now when you get to the flat, your evidence was - or the place where you found Mbulelo, your evidence was that it was only Mbulelo and a lady who was with him and other than that it would have been the four of you, yourself, Thulo and two people from the Lesotho Police, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="264">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="265">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Are you still certain that there was not a third person, a lady, that is - ja, a lady, a sister to Mbulelo&#039;s friend?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="266">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I am certain, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="267">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>And perhaps you can clear up this misunderstanding for me.  In your evidence you stated that the police took, the Lesotho Police took Mbulelo only and you left, went to the police station, they then handed Mbulelo to you.  In your affidavit, or your declaration - page 15I, Chairperson, paragraph 40, you state that KK was then arrested by the Lesotho Policemen, together with his friend.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="268">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson, I&#039;m not sure whether I remembered to do this, didn&#039;t I ask that that ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="269">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>That was clarified in the evidence-in-chief.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="270">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>That should be struck out.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="271">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>It should be struck out.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="272">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, and I said that is a clear mistake on the draughtsman&#039;s point.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="273">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t know if you picked that up.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="274">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>I missed that, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="275">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	So what is your evidence, is your evidence that she was not taken?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="276">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="277">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Now when you got to the farm, what did you tell KK or Mbulelo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="278">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>We introduced ourselves to him, we told him that we were the South African Police and we would wish that he work with us as an informer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="279">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>And what did he say?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="280">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>He could not take a decision at that moment, he wanted to know why we went to fetch so that he could be an informer while we knew that he was the member of the ANC.  And we talked to him until he agreed to work with us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="281">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>What I&#039;m interested in is, what is it that made him turn?  What is it that you said to him that made him agree to work with you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="282">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>My suspicion is that he realised that he had no alternative, because at that time he knew that in the Republic of South Africa he would be arrested.  So I think he was frightened at that moment.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="283">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>When you passed at the border with Mbulelo, you were not asked questions again?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="284">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="285">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>He was not worried that he&#039;s not crossing the border into South Africa with people who just cross the border without any passports or questions asked?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="286">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>He was surprised, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="287">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>He didn&#039;t ask you: &quot;Why are we able just to cross the way we are crossing?&quot;  Or was it obvious that you were South African Police at that stage?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="288">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>According to me Chairperson, he was already aware that we were the members of the South African Police.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="289">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>When the Lesotho Police arrested Mbulelo, what did they do, did they handcuff him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="290">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="291">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>When was he handcuffed, if at all he was?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="292">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>When they arrested him at his house they used his belt.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="293">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>But you just said he was handcuffed.  Why say he was handcuffed if they used his belt?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="294">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>My understanding of this word &quot;handcuff&quot; is that you can use anything to bind somebody&#039;s hands.  That is my understanding of the word &quot;to handcuff&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="295">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>But you&#039;re a policeman, you know what a handcuff is.  If you handcuff someone you use handcuffs, you don&#039;t tie them up.  There&#039;s a difference to a policeman between handcuffing and tying somebody.  You were a Warrant Officer, for goodness sake.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="296">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="297">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>You said in your evidence-in-chief that if she had, if Mbulelo had refused to work with you, you would have left him and returned him to Lesotho, didn&#039;t you maintain that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="298">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I did say that, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="299">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>And how much time had passed, that is from Betty&#039;s abduction to Mbulelo&#039;s arrest?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="300">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>It was about eight to nine days, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="301">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Now the police, the Roma police who assisted you, or who arrested Mbulelo, do you know their names?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="302">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson, I only know them by their faces.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="303">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>You also didn&#039;t know their ranks?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="304">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I knew their ranks, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="305">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>What were their ranks?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="306">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>They were Sergeants, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="307">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Are you able to describe these people, tall, short?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="308">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Would it assist us to know their height and weight and all that?  Or are you going to call those people?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="309">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>It&#039;s a possibility, Chairperson, and in fact what we need to know is, or what we need to find out from the applicant is, we need him to tell us who was with him for us to be to confirm whether he&#039;s telling the truth or not, and if he does not know their names, perhaps a description would assist us.  Like we said, there was a third person present, the was the lady friend to Mbulelo who is still alive today and I believe a response to that question would go a long way in assisting the applicant, for us to be able to say he&#039;s telling the truth or not on that aspect.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="310">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Well Chairperson, if I may, there is a statement in your bundle from page 45 by the girlfriend, who says that her sister was there and there is some conflict on that issue, but for the rest there&#039;s nothing that his witness said that can be tested by calling anyone else.  On the evidence of Macebe.  Because she says that four people arrived, she says that they took KK away and they came and fetched her later.  So with respect, I&#039;m not sure where it&#039;s going, but I&#039;m leaving it in your hands.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="311">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>No, I wouldn&#039;t allow that question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="312">
			<speaker>MR KOOPEDI</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I have no further questions for this witness.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="313">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR KOOPEDI</text>
		</line>
		<line number="314">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mapoma.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="315">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="316">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Was is the name of the place where Betty resided, in Lesotho?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="317">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is Ditabaneng ...(indistinct)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="318">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Is that the same as Nomasonto?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="319">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="320">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>And how far is that from Maseru?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="321">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>It can be about four kilometres from Maseru, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="322">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>And when you were surveilling her place of residence, were you using your car?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="323">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="324">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>What would you do, would you park the car in front of her place, or what?  How would you do this surveillance?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="325">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>We would park on the other street seven metres from Betty&#039;s place, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="326">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, how many metres?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="327">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I would say it can be seventy metres, not seven.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="328">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Seventy metres.  Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="329">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Seventeen, 17?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="330">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>7-0, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="331">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You may proceed, Mr Mapoma.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="332">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="333">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Now you said in your evidence-in-chief that on your first contact with her you followed her on her way to town and managed to speak to her.  Was she on foot?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="334">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="335">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Was she - how did she go to town?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="336">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>She boarded the taxi, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="337">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>And where did you meet her?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="338">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>We met with her in town, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="339">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>And is that where you managed to speak to her, in town?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="340">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="341">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Could my learned colleague just perhaps be specific, speak to her about what, because obviously we&#039;re talking a recruitment and later information that was received, so ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="342">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Hang on, this is the first introduction.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="343">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>The very first time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="344">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="345">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Alright.  Then very clearly these two persons are not on the same wavelength.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="346">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s his evidence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="347">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>With great respect, it has never been the evidence of this witness that they recruited her in Maseru.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="348">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Well that&#039;s what he&#039;s speaking to, he&#039;s just asked him these questions.  He says: &quot;When you - first you followed her to town, where did you meet her?  Met her in town.  She boarded a taxi&quot;.  This is about the first time he met her, that&#039;s been a clear premise to these questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="349">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>He&#039;s talking about the first time, Mr Visser, the very first contact.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="350">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m going to leave that, Chairperson, it&#039;s clear that there&#039;s a misunderstanding here.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="351">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Well it&#039;s not clear to me at all, but anyway.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="352">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Let&#039;s leave it to Mr Mapoma.  Could you put them with some more precision, Mr Mapoma, so that everybody follows.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="353">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>When you met with her in town, in Maseru, is that the stage when you happened to speak to her for the first time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="354">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, this thing happened more than 10 years ago, so the statement that we have written here, it&#039;s something that we tried to recall, it&#039;s not something that was written down.  So it becomes difficult for one to explain whether it was for the first time or not.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="355">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Jantjie, you told us that you had to recruit her and the question asked to you ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="356">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Just stop reading your statement, Mr Jantjie, just listen to the question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="357">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>... does not relate to jolt your memory about certain details.  It&#039;s quite obvious that you were here in the process to recruit somebody to be your informer, what is needed out of you now is to say when did you make that contact.  So they said the first contact you must know that the questions were not difficult, he said you surveilled the place, you then made contact with her.  It&#039;s simple, it doesn&#039;t require that you write down, or you should have written down 10 years ago what you exactly did.  I don&#039;t think so, and I don&#039;t think your appeal is appealing.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="358">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="359">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Jantjie, I want to get clarity on this.  In your evidence-in-chief you said you surveilled Betty for a number of days and then you managed, at some stage, to follow her to town and spoke to her.  That was the import of your evidence-in-chief.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="360">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Now I must make it quite clear that that was never the evidence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="361">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Give me a moment.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="362">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>The statement which he confirmed, Chairperson, at page ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="363">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Let&#039;s - just let us read our notes to see what the evidence was, with respect, Mr Visser.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="364">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Can I just refer you to the relevant passage?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="365">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m not interested in what he confirmed, I&#039;m interested in what he testified.  There&#039;s a difference.  Because he confirmed a whole range of passages, but then he went on to testify and explain it and that&#039;s what we&#039;re looking at.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="366">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>No, my note reads that there was some surveillance and</text>
		</line>
		<line number="367" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;after a few days we followed her from home to town&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="368">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR LAX</text>
		</line>
		<line number="369" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;We pretended to be MK people&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="370">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>... members.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="371" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;We pretended to be MK members.  It could be two to three days.  We followed her into Maseru town.  We just wanted to know people who visited her from time to time.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="372">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, and the evidence went on to say that</text>
		</line>
		<line number="373" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;She met her members in town, not at her home&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="374">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Pardon?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="375">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR VISSER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="376" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;She met her members in town, in Maseru, not at her home&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="377">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>But it was never the evidence that they spoke to her in Maseru, Chairperson, with great respect.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="378">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>So before all of this confusion has now arisen you were testifying and you were being asked about when did you first make contact with her.  Do you remember that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="379">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="380">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>And Mr Mapoma then said</text>
		</line>
		<line number="381" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;You followed her into town?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="382">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>you said:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="383" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Yes&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="384">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Do you remember that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="385">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I do, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="386">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>This was after she got onto a kombi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="387">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="388">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Taxi.  It does not follow that a taxi is a kombi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="389">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  What kind of taxi was it?  Was it a kombi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="390">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>It was a kombi, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="391">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Now she gets off the kombi in town somewhere, is that when you approach her to speak to her?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="392">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="393">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>And that was the first time you spoke to her?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="394">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="395">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Carry on, Mr Mapoma.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="396">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="397">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Now that is the first time you spoke to her and that is the time when you introduced yourselves as MK cadres to her, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="398">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="399">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>And that is the time when you had discussions with her about you assisting her with finances that she was running short of, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="400">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="401">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>And during these discussions, where exactly was she, or were you?  Were you inside your car or just in the street, where exactly?  Or somewhere else?  Just tell us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="402">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>We were not in the car, Chairperson, we were inside the OK building in Maseru.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="403">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>What kind of place was that?  Was it an office or a restaurant?  Just describe what kind of place was it actually, where you had these discussions with her.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="404">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>This building, where were you inside this building, in other words?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="405">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Inside this building, Chairperson - on the other side about 10 metres from this building there&#039;s other buildings and it something like a mall and that open space, there were seats there built by bricks for people to sit there and relax.  We were at that place, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="406">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>How long did you discuss with her?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="407">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I would say Chairperson, it could be 30 minutes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="408">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>And after you discussed, what was your final agreement with her?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="409">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>She gave us her telephone numbers and she said we should call her so that we make an arrangement about the place and the day where we could meet again.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="410">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, can I just be clear there.  She gave you her telephone numbers, is that right?  I didn&#039;t hear properly.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="411">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="412">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>You didn&#039;t give her your telephone numbers?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="413">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson, not at that stage.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="414">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You may proceed, Mr Mapoma.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="415">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="416">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Now other than you introducing yourselves as MK cadres to her and getting her saying that she had financial problems with the ANC, what else did you discuss with her?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="417">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Nothing else, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="418">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Now at what stage did you agree with her that she was going to work with you as your informer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="419">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I think Chairperson, it was during our second meeting with her.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="420">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>And when was your second meeting, relative to the first meeting?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="421">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I do not remember, Chairperson, but it could not have been more than a week.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="422">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Come again, I didn&#039;t hear.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="423">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>It could not have been more than a week.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="424">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Oh, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="425">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	And where was that second meeting?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="426">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>In Maseru, Chairperson, though I do not remember the place.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="427">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>And that is the place where the deal was struck that she was going to be your informer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="428">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="429">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>What do you mean, no?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="430">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>During our second meeting, Chairperson, it was a continuation of what we discussed in our first meeting, that is the financial problems.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="431">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>But you said that it is at that second meeting that you agreed with her that she&#039;s going to work for you as an informer.  That&#039;s what you&#039;ve just said.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="432">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is why I say, Chairperson, sometimes I will mix these meetings, one cannot recall precisely what the agreements were in our first meeting or second meeting or our third meeting.  That is the problem that I have.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="433">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>And you can recall that it was not more than a week that you agreed with her that she&#039;s going to work for you, is that not so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="434">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I suppose it would be proper to ask the witness whether in that second meeting that&#039;s where she agreed to work for them, because of the answer he just gave prior to you asking that question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="435">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="436">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Now in that second meeting that you had with her, did you agree with her that she&#039;s going to work for you as your informer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="437">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I do not remember whether it was during that second meeting or the third one.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="438">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Now during this period of these meetings with her, would you meet with her and go back to South Africa and then come back again to meet with her, or were you just around Lesotho?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="439">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, we would go to Lesotho every time we were going to meet with her, and go back to South Africa, or sometimes when we realised that we would not be able to go there, we will just call her and postpone the meeting and meet with her the other time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="440">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Can I just try and clarify something?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="441">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	You had this first meeting with her, you tell her you were going to try and help her financially, am I right so far?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="442">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="443">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>What arrangement did you make with her?  Did you say to her: &quot;Look, we&#039;re going to go and make some enquiries and we&#039;re going to come back to you in due course, give us your phone number, we&#039;ll phone you&quot;?  What did you say to her?  Something like that, or?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="444">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="445">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>And what did you promise her?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="446">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>We promised her that we&#039;ll help her financially.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="447">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>But did you make some enquiries of her about what her financial needs were, so that you would know how to help her?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="448">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>We did not ask her, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="449">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Well then how would you know what to help her with if you didn&#039;t know what her requirements were?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="450">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, she explained that she always received her money late and when it arrives, after she has spent some money for, distributed the money to other people, she&#039;s left with nothing for her own obligations.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="451">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Yes but Sir, if you&#039;re trying to convince someone that you want to help them financially, surely you&#039;ve got to know what their need is, how much you have to get to help them.  And surely you as a Security policeman would have to know that you&#039;d have to put in a requisition for a certain amount of money in order to be able to convince this person that you are actually helping her?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="452">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="453">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Well how were you going to put in a requisition if you didn&#039;t ask her what her needs were financially, you didn&#039;t ask her what her rental was, you didn&#039;t ask her how much she needed for bus fare or food or whatever?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="454">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>No, rather not a requisition, rather how you were going to help her.  Not a requisition.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="455">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>No, no.  In order to get the money you would have to requisition it from your office.  You weren&#039;t going to help her out of your own pocket, you were going to have to get State money to pay her to carry on with this pretence that you were MK people helping her, isn&#039;t that so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="456">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>The money to help her will come from the office.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="457">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Which office?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="458">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>In Ladybrand, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="459">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>And in order to take that money from the office in Ladybrand, you have to fill out documentation.  You&#039;ve got to get approval.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="460">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="461">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Now my question is this, in order to put in a report in order to requisition the correct amount of money, you&#039;ve got to say: &quot;Look, we need the money for this and this purpose, this is your potential informant or informer, we&#039;re working on a recruitment, this is how much we need to convince this person that we&#039;re genuine&quot;.  It&#039;s logical.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="462">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I agree with you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="463">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Well how were you going to do that if you didn&#039;t ask her what her needs were?  You didn&#039;t have any idea of how much would be an appropriate amount.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="464">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I would talk to Mr Jagga and we would agree about the amount that we think, when we request it we will get it, so that we give her that amount of money.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="465">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>We will take a tea adjournment at this point, for 15 minutes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="466">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="467">
			<speaker>LESIZI MICHAEL JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>(s.u.o.)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="468">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Mr Jantjie, before we broke, we were just dealing with the question of how you were going to help Betty Boom and I was asking you some questions about requisitioning money.  The primary question is this - you have told us that you didn&#039;t enquire as to what her financial needs were at all.  You have also told us that you would need to requisition the money.  How were you going to know what to requisition and what would be an appropriate amount if you hadn&#039;t enquired this from her?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="469">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Myself and Jagga would agree about the amount that we were going to request and we would tell the Betty about this.  If she says that it is little, myself and Jagga, we would try again, using the same method.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="470">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>But you see, your cover story to her is that you are her comrades and that you have money available?  How is she going to believe you if you arrive with a small amount of money and she tells you it is not enough, then you will have to say &quot;well, we will have to go back and get some more&quot;?  Surely she is going to think there is something funny going on here?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="471">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>She could think so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="472">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Carry on, Mr Mapoma, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="473">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>(continued)   Thank you sir.  I will leave that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="474">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>I understand you were a Warrant Officer during that period, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="475">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="476">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>What was Mr Jagga&#039;s rank?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="477">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>He was also a Warrant Officer at that time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="478">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>You were both reporting to Mr Robertshaw, is that so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="479">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="480">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>What was Mr Thulo&#039;s rank?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="481">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>He was a Sergeant, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="482">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>When you went to fetch Betty, it was the four of you, am I correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="483">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="484">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>When you were discussing with Betty at the farm, after having fetched her, were the four of you present?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="485">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="486">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Who was present and who was not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="487">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Those who were present was myself, Anthony Jagga.  Those who were not present was Mr Robertshaw and Mr Thulo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="488">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Why were they not present?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="489">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>The decision that we made was that it should be myself and Mr Jagga who would be involved in recruitment.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="490">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Why?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="491">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That was our decision that we could not do this job of recruitment, the four of us, it is a job that can be done by two people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="492">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>No, you had already recruited Betty, she was already your informer?  When you were discussing with her in the farm, she was already your informer, you were no longer recruiting her.  Why was it only you and Jagga who were present in discussing with her?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="493">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>It is because myself and Mr Jagga were going to be the people who will handle these people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="494">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Thulo was also a member of the Security Branch, is that so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="495">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="496">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>What about Tsolo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="497">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>It is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="498">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>And Mkungulwa as well, was he a member of the Security Branch?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="499">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="500">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>What was Mr Tsolo&#039;s rank then?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="501">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I do not remember Chairperson, but I think he  was a Sergeant at that time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="502">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Is he still in the employ of the South African Police?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="503">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="504">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mkungulwa, is he still in the employ of the South African Police Services?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="505">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="506">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Where is he, do you know?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="507">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I do not know Chairperson, but I have heard that he might be in Lesotho.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="508">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Where is Mr Tsolo stationed now, to your knowledge?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="509">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>He is working at Maseru Bridge border post, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="510">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Who instructed Mr Tsolo and Mkungulwa to take Nomasonto&#039;s child to Vereeniging?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="511">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>It is Mr Robertshaw, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="512">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson, that is all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="513">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR MAPOMA</text>
		</line>
		<line number="514">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Mapoma.  Mr Visser, any re-examination?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="515">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>No re-examination, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="516">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO RE-EXAMINATION BY MR VISSER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="517">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Anything from the panel?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="518">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson.   You told us that one of Betty Boom&#039;s main problems was that she wanted to go home, she was tired of the struggle, she wanted to go home?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="519">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="520">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Well, how was someone who wanted to go  home and who was tired of the struggle, now suddenly going to be your informer and go back into Lesotho, away from her home, and carry on with the struggle for the other side?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="521">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, when we recruited Betty, we changed her mind that she should work for us, because we wanted to get information.  That is the agreement between ourselves and her.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="522">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>So she suddenly stopped being homesick and now she was imbued with a new fervour to fight the struggle again?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="523">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes Chairperson, we agreed that she should go back to Lesotho, and she agreed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="524">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Now, just to clarify Mkungulwa, what was his rank, we didn&#039;t get to that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="525">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>He was a Sergeant, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="526">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Also a Sergeant?  Okay.  Now, just on the issue of that money that you were going to organise, you have told us that the maximum that you could organise at that stage was R250-00, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="527">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="528">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Well, how were you able to organise the R750-00 then, which you paid each of them before they left?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="529">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, if you allow me I would request an opportunity so that I can explain why we managed to get the R750-00, if the Chairperson allows me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="530">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="531">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>We would be grateful to you if you could explain that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="532">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>This amount, that is R750-00, each person was given not more than R250-00.  In each request that you make to get money, sometimes you may give three requests, that would be approved.   You would not make one request, for one person to the amount of R750-00.  The reason why it was R750-00, it is because we made three requisitions, three different requisitions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="533">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What about KK, did you agree to pay him when he worked for you, Ngono Mbulelo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="534">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="535">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You may proceed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="536">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>And you say you did pay him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="537">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Not as far as I can recall, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="538">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Why didn&#039;t you pay him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="539">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I do not remember the reasons why we did not pay him.  I think in our next meeting, we would give him something.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="540">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>I see.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="541">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Not because when you took him back to Lesotho, you never had contact with him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="542">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes Chairperson, we never met him again.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="543">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Now, just with regard to Nomasonto, what would you have done with her if she had refused to become an informer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="544">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>We would take her back to Lesotho, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="545">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>And you wouldn&#039;t prosecute her, either?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="546">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson, we would not do that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="547">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Why not, when your duty was to track down these MK members who were giving South Africa a problem?  Why get hold of an MK member and recruit that person, and when that person refuses, you take that person back, why?  Is it not defeating the very purpose of your duties?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="548">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I would also request the Chairperson to give me an opportunity so that I can explain why we took Nomasonto back to Lesotho, even though she would have refused to work with us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="549">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, come with that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="550">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>During those years, between 1965 until 1970,  in Ladybrand, before I worked for the South African Police, what I heard from the office was that other members were working for the Security Police, abducted a certain refugee from Lesotho, who was Solomon Mungay, they brought him to South Africa.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="551">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	When they arrived in South Africa, they tried to prosecute him.  The international law were against the idea that Solomon Mungay should be prosecuted in Lesotho because he was not arrested in South Africa, but he was abducted in Lesotho.  The reason why we returned Nomasonto to Lesotho, it is because we did not have the powers or the law would not allow us, to prosecute her in the Republic of South Africa as we did not arrest her in South Africa, we abducted her in Lesotho.  Therefore we did not have the powers to do so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="552">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Why waste your efforts to track these people down and take them into the country and take them back, why waste your efforts?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="553">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, we went to fetch these people because we wanted to recruit them, so that they could divulge some information to us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="554">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Why not rather do this, which is what you people often did, why not hand them back to the Lesotho Police to prosecute them, or alternatively to have them deported back to Zambia, Tanzania, Angola, wherever?  That way they are out of your hair, and you have inconvenienced the ANC and MK?  Surely that was the logical thing to do if you could not prosecute them?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="555">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, we did not have the powers to tell the Lesotho government to prosecute somebody only because they are a member of the ANC or the PAC or he was a refugee.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="556">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Well, with the greatest of respect sir, Mr Ngono was found with a handgrenade, even on your evidence, that couldn&#039;t have been lawful in Lesotho to be in possession of a handgrenade?  Why didn&#039;t you hand him back to the Lesotho Police?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="557">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>We did not do that Chairperson, because our main aim was to recruit Mr Mbulelo Ngono.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="558">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>I see.  When did you join the Security Branch, just remind me, please?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="559">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>In 1977 Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="560">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>And this was in 1987, so at this stage you had been in the Police Security Branch for 10 years and you were a Warrant Officer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="561">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="562">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>You had been working with, were you working on the ANC Desk, were you a field worker connected to that desk?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="563">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="564">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>You would therefore have had fairly extensive knowledge of the ANC structures?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="565">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="566">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>You would have known about their Regional Political Military Council?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="567">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="568">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>You would have known about the different machineries that were operating from Lesotho?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="569">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="570">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>You would have also had other knowledge about other areas that were related, because people moved from area to area?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="571">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="572">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>You would have had knowledge of the South African Communist Party, because many of the ANC members were Communist Party members?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="573">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I did not have knowledge of the South African Communist Party, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="574">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Are you serious?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="575">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="576">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Did you have knowledge of MK?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="577">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="578">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>What was the Free State machinery?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="579">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>There is nothing that I remember about the Free State  machinery.  The only thing that I know is that there was a Free State machinery in Lesotho, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="580">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>You cannot be serious?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="581">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You had contact with Betty Boom, was that not some of the information you had to get out of her, about the Free State machinery?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="582">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="583">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did you attempt to get that other than be interested that she should be your informer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="584">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson, we tried to get from her how the Free State machinery operated.  When I say I know nothing about the Free State machinery, I am saying that apart from this people that we went to fetch in Lesotho, those are the other people that I know.  There are no other people that I know.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="585">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The question is did you not ask how the Free State machinery was operating from the Commander or the other two, Betty Boom?  This was an opportunity for you to find out precisely how it operated, or what it was like?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="586">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I do not recall everything.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="587">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What is that which you don&#039;t recall?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="588">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>When I say I do not recall, I mean that I cannot specifically say what she told us about the Free State machinery, because what she told us,  we would write it down and send it to Bloemfontein, and then in Bloemfontein they would distribute this information to other offices and in those offices, they will take action against those people, either arrest them or do something against them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="589">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Jantjie, you recall that during those years, there was a heavy onslaught from the liberation movements into South Africa, you recall that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="590">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes I do, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="591">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And you might have heard because of this heavy onslaught, places like Lesotho and Botswana were raided by the South African Defence Force?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="592">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="593">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And from Betty Boom you were able to at least get somebody who was operating in the Cape, who was eventually arrested?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="594">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="595">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And the purpose of the Security Branch in Ladybrand was to sift out these people in Lesotho, so that at least the Free State should be guarded against this onslaught?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="596">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="597">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You get information, you don&#039;t pay particular attention to this information, you rather send it to another office of the Security Branch, is that what I am understanding from you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="598">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="599">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And how did you think you would get further information if you did not understand the machinery that operated within the Free State?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="600">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>May you please repeat the question, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="601">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>How would you track down the other insurgents for the treat that emanated from Lesotho, if you did not know the machinery that operated within the Free State?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="602">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Like I am trying to explain Chairperson, the information that she gave to us, we would take this information to Bloemfontein.  We would not be able to get other people, unless we get information from Betty, I don&#039;t know whether I have answered your question, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="603">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You may proceed, Mr Lax.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="604">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Do I understand you correctly that you didn&#039;t really know anything about the Free State machinery?  This was your first breakthrough?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="605">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="606">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Mr Jantjie, please, we are not children here.  You are a senior black Security Policeman, you must have known the complete structure of the Free State machinery in order to do your work, isn&#039;t that so, otherwise you wouldn&#039;t know who you were recruiting, where they fitted into the picture, what kind of information to expect from them, isn&#039;t that so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="607">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>It is so Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="608">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Yes?  And isn&#039;t it so that the Free State machinery consisted of a number of cells, not just one cell?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="609">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, we only knew Betty&#039;s cell.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="610">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>I am asking you about your general knowledge of the structure.  Every machinery consisted of many cells, not just one cell?  How were three people going to operate in the whole of the Free State as the machinery?   You can see how absurd your statement is, can&#039;t you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="611">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>It seems like that Chairperson, but what I know is that we were able to know about Betty&#039;s cell.  She gave us two names of the people that she knew in Bloemfontein.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="612">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>May I just interpose Mr Lax?  Mr Jantjie, you were the only black person within Ladybrand who worked for the Security Branch, isn&#039;t that so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="613">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="614">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Was there another Jantjie?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="615">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, I was the only Jantjie Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="616">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I will tell you why I am asking you this.   On Monday we had the application of Henri van der Westhuizen who worked for the Military Intelligence.  He implicated you in a sense that he at some stage went to Ladybrand and amongst the people he met at Ladybrand was Warrant Officer Jantjie.   Just hearing of the surname, I mistook you for white and he said no, black.  You, him, Boshoff, Nortje, Snor Vermeulen went into Lesotho.  You and other black colleagues were in a separate car, going to find out about ANC members at a certain house in Lesotho, and you black Security Police shot at those people, or there was an exchange of fire between you and the others, do you know Mr Henri van der Westhuizen?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="617">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I do remember this name, because the Security Branch office in Ladybrand was frequented by many white policemen, so I cannot say that I don&#039;t know him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="618">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Just to give you a picture of who he was, he was a special guy that came to help your branch.  He came to help your branch develop target structures.  He was a specialist on the ANC, within Special Forces, Military Intelligence and he specifically came to Ladybrand to work with your members.  Why should he mention your name as being part of an operation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="619">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>If Chairperson will allow me, and give me a chance to explain about the people who were sent by Pretoria to Ladybrand to go and investigate about the ANC people in Lesotho.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="620">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>No, no, he wasn&#039;t sent for that purpose.  He was sent to assist your people with Intelligence information, to help you develop better Intelligence structures and better co-ordinated Intelligence structures.  Do you understand?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="621">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I do understand Chairperson.  Can I be granted an opportunity to explain?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="622">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Let me just finish.  He worked in your office for six months, he was based in your office in Ladybrand for six months at least.  You don&#039;t remember the man?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="623">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I have already said Chairperson, if I can see van der Westhuizen, maybe I will be able to recall him, because at our office at Ladybrand, I have never worked with a Mr van der Westhuizen.  That is why I said I wanted to explain about those people who were sent to Ladybrand from other places, how they operated there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="624">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Before you do that, let me give you a complete picture of what Mr van der Westhuizen said to us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="625">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	He said even Eugene de Kock was a frequent guest at Ladybrand, did you ever see Mr de Kock visiting you people there, Mr de Kock, the famous one from Vlakplaas?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="626">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he frequented that office, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="627">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did you know of his escapades or visitations into Lesotho, that is Mr de Kock?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="628">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson, but I knew that he was one of the people who were tracking down the MK people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="629">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Tell us about what you know about the people sent from Pretoria to Ladybrand.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="630">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Put it this way Chairperson, these people were sent from the outside, who were sent to come and assist us, or to get information that we had in our office, they would meet with the person who was the Head of our Branch and he was the person who would sit down with them and discuss everything with them regarding the information that we have collected from Lesotho.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="631">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Then if they wanted to make questions, they would ask our Head and our Head would direct those questions to us.  We would in turn give Mr Fouche the answers or the information that he had requested.  Mr Fouche was our Head at that time.  The reason why we could not have a direct link with these people from outside Ladybrand was that at some point one of the people who was working for the Military Intelligence, arrived at Ladybrand and he tried to recruit black people who were working as securities, to give him information  directly.   We told our Head about that person from the Military Intelligence and that is the reason why we were told that we should not have direct contact with these people from outside our office.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="632">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>He actually mentioned Mr Fouche, that one of the people who was Head of Ladybrand Security Branch was Mr Fouche, so it would appear his evidence is credible in that instance?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="633">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Mr van der Westhuizen,  in his statement he would mention the names of the people that he knew or he knows in Ladybrand, that does not mean that the statement that he made, is correct.  That is my understanding, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="634">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>During the period in question, even during the period in question that you are talking about, he says he was stationed, he was for six months in Ladybrand, the period in question?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="635">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I would not say van der Westhuizen was stationed at Ladybrand, because you would see him today and the next day he is no longer there, and on the third day, he would come back.  So that to me ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="636">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>How are you able to say that, because you said you will only know Mr van der Westhuizen if he can be brought before you, how could you now say that he would be there for three days and then he wouldn&#039;t be there, how are you able to say that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="637">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I say so Chairperson, because that is what he was doing.  He would disappear for a day or three days.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="638">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did you know him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="639">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I used to know him there.  He used to visit our office.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="640">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Then why did you tell us you didn&#039;t know who he was, you couldn&#039;t even recognise him, you would have to see him first?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="641">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I am saying that the last time that I saw van der Westhuizen was when I was still employed by the South African Police, but when he can be shown to me, I would be able to recognise him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="642">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>In any event, I just wanted to apprise you of the evidence that we heard from him on Monday.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="643">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Just to get back to the machinery, so you are telling us that until you met Betty Boom, and she began to give you information about the Free State machinery, you didn&#039;t know anything else about the Free State machinery?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="644">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, it could happen that the information that we got from other offices of the Security Branch in the country, we would get information about the Free State machinery.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="645">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Well, then why do you keep saying you didn&#039;t know anything about the Free State machinery until you met her and she gave you the information?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="646">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I said I have a suspicion that from the newspapers that we used to receive at our office, we used to read about the Free State machinery, its existence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="647">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>You&#039;ve got to be joking now, sir?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="648">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Please, please.  The ANC would give the newspaper what their machinery is, what in the Free State?  Please?  Is this not information gathered by the Intelligence community of the South African Republic&#039;s regime?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="649">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I was saying these newspapers were sent from the offices of the Security Branch.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="650">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>So did the ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="651">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Oh, memo&#039;s in other words?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="652">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>No, no, he said ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="653">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Communications between the various departments of the Intelligence community, that is what you are referring to?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="654">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="655">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I understand the unfortunate choice of words.  I am with you, thank you.  You may proceed, Mr Lax.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="656">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>In those memo&#039;s and news, or information bulletins, you would get a description of the structure of the Free State machinery?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="657">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I do not recall well, but it could be so Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="658">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  The fact of the matter is though that Betty Boom wasn&#039;t the Commander of a cell, she was the Commander of a machinery, isn&#039;t that so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="659">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>It is so Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="660">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Why do you refer to her as the Commander of a cell, rather than as a Commander of the Free State machinery?  In all your applications, each one of you refers to her as a Cell Commander, not as a Commander of the Free State machinery, why is that?  There is a big difference, isn&#039;t there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="661">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>There is, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="662">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Can you explain why you have only referred to her as a Commander of a cell?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="663">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>According to me, the person who was the Commander of a cell, was the same person who was the Commander of the machinery.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="664">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What level of education have you obtained, Mr Jantjie?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="665">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Up to standard 7, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="666">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="667">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>But you have passed all sorts of Police exams to become a Warrant Officer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="668">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I never wrote even a single exam, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="669">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>I see, so you were just promoted?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="670">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="671">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>You can read Afrikaans?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="672">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="673">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>You can certainly understand it and speak it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="674">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="675">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>You are not exactly an illiterate person, are you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="676">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="677">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Now, you told us earlier in your evidence that you didn&#039;t know anything about the cell members?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="678">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="679">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>How could you have told us  when you were being cross-examined, that you knew they were highly trained members of MK?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="680">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I said members of the MK had military training.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="681">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>No, no, that wasn&#039;t the evidence.  The evidence was that they were highly trained, and I made a note of that because it struck me as rather peculiar that on the one hand you would say you didn&#039;t know anything about these people, and then you should say that they were highly trained.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="682">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>As far as I am concerned, Chairperson, each and every person who have been trained as MK, or who was a Commander of the machinery,  it must be the person who did not only receive military training.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="683">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>We are not talking about the Commander, we are talking about the other two, and (indistinct) for that matter.  We cannot hear?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="684">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>May you please repeat the question again, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="685">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Sure.  Can you explain this to me, we can assume that a Commander would be highly trained, that I don&#039;t have a difficulty with that.  But you said you knew nothing about the others, the cell members?  Then how could you know that they were highly trained, if you knew nothing about them?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="686">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Apart from what I read from the bulletins or newspapers or hearing from him, that was the only way I could know how he was trained.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="687">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>So you didn&#039;t know that they were highly trained?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="688">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="689">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Now, at page 11 of the papers, in your amnesty application, you say that you went to Roma, you and Thulo went to Roma to fetch Ngono, in the fourth paragraph, second and third lines.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="690" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;... &#039;Ek en DD Thulo is na Roma waar ons hom gaan haal het&#039;&quot;,</text>
		</line>
		<line number="691">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	and that is a reference, &quot;hom&quot; is a reference to Ngono.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="692">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="693">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Well, you went there to recruit him, not to fetch him?  Why do you give the wrong impression in your amnesty application?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="694">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>With respect Chairperson ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="695">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>No, no.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="696">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Let&#039;s just read the ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="697">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Pages 15 and others, there it is expanded.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="698">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>But apart from that, Chairperson, if one reads paragraph 11, he says</text>
		</line>
		<line number="699" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;... Thulo and I went to Roma ...&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="700">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>With the greatest of respect, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="701">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>It does not say Chairperson, with respect, that we went there with the view of going to fetch him.  It does not say that, that is the question being put to this witness, and it is an unfair question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="702">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>The question with the greatest of respect, Mr Visser, is put on the premise that their instructions were to recruit him and on that basis, that your instructions were to recruit him, why do you say in your amnesty application, that you went there to fetch him and there is quite a substantial difference between going there to recruit somebody and then changing your mind and then having him arrested, and going there simply to fetch him.  The impression created in going there to fetch him, is that it was your instruction to go and fetch him, and that is quite different?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="703">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>That is a different matter, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="704">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>And that is in that context that I was asking the question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="705">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is a different matter, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="706">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Will you explain this to me, please?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="707">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I explained that on our way to Roma, Mr Robertshaw said to us we should recruit Mr Ngono.  On our way, myself and Mr Thulo, we decided that it would be easier for us to take Mr Ngono with us because we had already realised that we can use the same method that we used before at the farm, and this is the only reason why we decided to take Ngono to the farm.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="708">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Well, you see, your amnesty application does not say that?  Your amnesty application gives the impression   that you were going to use the same method as before, that you were going to fetch him and take him to the farm, and that is very different to what your instructions were.  Please explain this to us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="709">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, really, I do not have another explanation apart from the one that I have already given.  Apart from reaching a decision, myself and Mr Thulo, that we should fetch him and take him to the farm.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="710">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did you have a discretion in your operations?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="711">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes sir.  Sometimes we would be told that we can use our own discretion, as long as it would bring benefits.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="712">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You did not have to execute instructions to the letter as given by Mr Robertshaw?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="713">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="714">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>You see the problem for me, is a different one.   I accept that you had discretion, what I find difficult is in your amnesty application, you give a completely different picture of the plan?  You don&#039;t say that you changed your mind midway through and then decided to follow a different plan?  You say the plan was simply to abduct him and take him there, on the same basis as the others?  Do you see the difference?  I accept that you cannot explain it, but can you see the difference?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="715">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I do Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="716">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Now, my last set of questions go around this issue.   It has sort of been covered a bit before, so forgive me for covering ground that has already partly been covered, but I want to deal with them in a composite way.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="717">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	How did you discover that there were security concerns about Betty Boom, how did you first discover that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="718">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, the person who was our informer, is the one who gave us that information.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="719">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>And then, what did you do about that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="720">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>We discussed that with our superior and thereafter Betty confirmed that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="721">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>And then based on that understanding, you hatched a plan to appear to abduct her to South Africa, is that right?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="722">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="723">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>And the purpose of that plan was to give her credibility and to avoid the suspicions pertaining to her?  Do I understand that correctly?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="724">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="725">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Now, who was suspicious about her?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="726">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, the information that we got from our informer was that those were the people who lived with her in that area.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="727">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>They were the people who lived with her in that area?  Is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="728">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I am referring to the people in the neighbourhood, her neighbours or the persons in the same street, in that way, Chairperson.  That is so Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="729">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Just for the record, the Chairperson said the Lesotho citizens, and he confirmed that.  That wasn&#039;t translated for us, unfortunately.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="730">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>He said so Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="731">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>I beg your pardon?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="732">
			<speaker>INTERPRETER</speaker>
			<text>He said so, that is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="733">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  What wasn&#039;t translated was the Chairperson&#039;s words, which formed the basis of which he said &quot;that is correct&quot;.  What the Chairperson said, I just wanted it recorded, is the Basotho&#039;s.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="734">
			<speaker>INTERPRETER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson said Basotho&#039;s there, that is correct, that is Lesotho citizens.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="735">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>These were the people in the neighbourhood where she lived?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="736">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="737">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Did she say why they were suspicious?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="738">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Are you referring to our informer, Chairperson?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="739">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is the information that came from the informer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="740">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, he said to us that there is a rumour that the people in the neighbourhood suspect that Betty was working with the people from the Republic of South Africa who were policemen.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="741">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What did they know about Betty, that is the neighbours, according to your informant?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="742">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>According to our informer, Chairperson, there were people who knew that Betty was not a Lesotho citizen, she was from the Republic and she was a member of the ANC.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="743">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Why do you say, before you proceed, why do you say it would appear?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="744">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I am referring to the report that we received from our informer, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="745">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did they know or did they not know that Betty was in exile and she was a member of the ANC and in this respect, belonging to the military wing?  Did those people know that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="746">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>They were suspicious Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="747">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>We are not asking whether they were suspicious, surely the people who she lived with, the neighbours must have known that and that would have been the information that your informer would have relayed to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="748">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I will answer this way, Chairperson.   According to our informer, the people were suspicious that Betty was working with the police from the Republic of South Africa.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="749">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	He did not tell us that they know.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="750">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did the other two comrades know, that is Nomasonto Mahleha and Tax Janaman?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="751">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>They learnt about that at the farm, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="752">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Just in fairness to you, when you were questioned the day before yesterday, you said even the comrades suspected her and that is what you got from the informer and I actually expressed surprise, do you recall that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="753">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I do not remember Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="754">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I said when you came and said your informer had told you that Betty has been suspected, the question arose &quot;by whom&quot; and you said - I will come to you, if you will give me a moment, I will find it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="755">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>You don&#039;t have to find it Chairperson, I agree, he said the comrades, the other ANC people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="756">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So it would appear my memory is still with me at this young age?  You see what I mean, and now you are telling us that you found that out at the farm?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="757">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I agree with you Chairperson, on this point.  Maybe I have explained this issue in a different way, I was not supposed to have explained it this way, so I think I was not aware that I am giving the wrong explanation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="758">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Let&#039;s get the proper explanation of who suspected Betty Boom.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="759">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, like I have just said the people in the neighbourhood were the people we were told had suspicions that Betty was working with the police from South Africa.  When I go back to the issues surrounding the people who were members of MK, we took Betty to Ladybrand so that when we go, when we bring this other MK members, they should see that Betty is already there and is working for us, so that they do not have suspicions on Betty.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="760">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Let&#039;s just get this one clear.  Did the other comrades suspect her of that, or was it expressed at the farm that they had such suspicions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="761">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson, they did not have any suspicion on her.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="762">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t want to detract you from what Mr Lax is asking you.  These people, the Basotho, the Lesotho citizens, who suspected that Betty Boom was working with South African Police, were you wearing uniforms across the border?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="763">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="764">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Were you known when you were having these frequent excursions into Lesotho that you were South African Police by the ordinary citizens?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="765">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, most of the people in areas that we used to visit, knew us well.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="766">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>This area which is four to five kilometres away, Detabaneng, did those people know you to be South African Police?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="767">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="768">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Are you aware that I am referring to the area where Betty Boom was residing?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="769">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="770">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>When you approached Betty Boom and said &quot;we were comrades,  you would assist financially&quot;, she didn&#039;t know of your identity or suspected your identity at least?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="771">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson, she didn&#039;t know us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="772">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Lax, you may continue.  I am sorry.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="773">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>No, no, that is fine.  Mr Jantjie, isn&#039;t it self-evident and a fact that if the neighbours suspected her of working with you, the only reason they would bother to have a suspicion or find anything untoward in it, is if they knew she was an ANC member?  Otherwise, what was there to suspect?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="774">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>It is not so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="775">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Well, then, what would they be suspicious about, what would the problem be, that she was working with you?  Just explain that to me, because I cannot see it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="776">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>It is because Chairperson, they knew that she was not a Lesotho citizen, she was a refugee from South Africa.  They used to see us in that area where she resided.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="777">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did you make contact with her in the area where she resided?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="778">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, if I am not mistaken, we did, but once.  Although I am not sure about the number of times that we met her there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="779">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>How long before the &quot;abduction&quot; were you seeing Betty?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="780">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>It could be a day to two days Chairperson.  I am sorry Chairperson, it can be three days.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="781">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>No, no, don&#039;t misunderstand me because I may have been inelegant in posing my question.  Over what period of time,  that you had made contact with Betty in the mall in the OK Bazaars building?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="782">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="783">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>That is now the time period that I am talking about, up to the stage where you abducted her?  I don&#039;t want you to give me something precise, we are talking about a long time ago, an estimation would suffice for my purposes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="784">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>It could be a month Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="785">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="786">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>And in addition to that month, you spent, I think if I remember correctly you said about three weeks keeping her under surveillance, three days, I beg your pardon?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="787">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="788">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Now, please explain this to me, how would appearing to abduct her, give her credibility?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="789">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, we did that so that when people learn about her disappearance, people should know that she did not leave voluntarily.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="790">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Exactly.  But even so, how would that give her credibility when you sent her back?  Wouldn&#039;t they suspect her even more as a result of her being abducted?  Because now it wasn&#039;t just suspicions of contact, now they had real knowledge that she had been abducted and wouldn&#039;t that confirm for them that she had been in your hands?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="791">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson, they would not have more suspicion on her, they would want her to explain the circumstances surrounding her abduction.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="792">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Yes, but now she would be required to explain two things.  Firstly she would be required to explain why she had been seen in contact with you, correct?  And secondly she would have to explain what she was doing while they abducted her and she was away for a whole week?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="793">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="794">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>How would she explain that innocently, and that she is then released, which is even stranger?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="795">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it is so Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="796">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>What possible explanation could she come up with in those circumstances, that would be acceptable to anybody with any intelligence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="797">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, she would give an explanation that she was abducted and we tried to recruit her, and she refused.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="798">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>I see.  You know what that would then entail for her?  What would the consequence of such explanation be?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="799">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I do not know Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="800">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Well, I will tell you what the consequences of such an explanation would be, seeing as you cannot even work it out for yourself.  As a Security Policeman I would have thought that you would know this explanation.  She would immediately be scrutinised by the DIS of the ANC, in all likelihood she would be returned to Lusaka immediately for a period of intensive interrogation.  You see, we are not talking about an average MK cadre, who is just an happy-go-lucky footsoldier, we are talking about a Commander?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="801">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	MK were very sensitive about their Commanders being recruited.  I will give you an example, Thami Zulu was suspected in Swaziland, you know about Thami Zulu?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="802">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I do not know him, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="803">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Thami Zulu was Head of the Natal machinery, in an equivalent position to Betty Boom and when they suspected him, they immediately sent him to Lusaka and he had a very rough time there.  You didn&#039;t expect that, did you?  You just thought that her explanation would be acceptable?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="804">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson, we didn&#039;t expect that to happen to her.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="805">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  Now, contrary to what you have told us today, you have told us in other evidence that her comrades suspected her and you have told us that the primary purpose of this plan was to abduct her so that you could use her as the bait to abduct her comrades, and recruit them.  The purpose of that recruitment would be in essence to neutralise the threat that they posed to her.  That is the plan as I understand it.  Am I right?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="806">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Wouldn&#039;t he have retracted that after my questioning along those aspects?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="807">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>I am just wanting to confirm whether he is agreeing or not.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="808">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he said a lot of things, but Mr Lax, if he is wrong, in spite of Mr Lax&#039; aggression, I will interfere.  He is quite correct in what he has just put.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="809">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he has retracted that, I don&#039;t think that we should go back to that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="810">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Well you see, if that isn&#039;t the plan,  if the plan isn&#039;t to neutralise her comrades who know about her and who suspect her, then what was the object of the plan because that is the reason you gave us earlier for this plan?  What different object was there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="811">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, our objective was to neutralise those people who suspected Betty and we wanted to get information from different sources, that is the people who were working with her.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="812">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>But you see the problem with the second part of your answer, to get information from different sources, the problem with that is that you have told us that she was going to be the channel through which they report to you, so that doesn&#039;t make sense?  They couldn&#039;t give you anything more than she already knew and in any event, it would be channelled through her, so they couldn&#039;t possibly, the object couldn&#039;t have been to get information from them?   Do you understand?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="813">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I do understand Chairperson.  I will explain.   It could have happened, Betty knew something about the people who working with her.  Maybe Tax Janaman could also meet somebody who belonged to the Western Cape machinery, and that is the kind of information that would add to the information that we would receive from Betty.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="814">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>But Betty is the Commander of the entire machinery and you only needed one contact point?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="815">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson, like I have already explained that she would give us information about the people who were working with her and one of the people who was working with her, could also meet somebody who was working elsewhere and he could give that information to Betty.  Although our only source would be Betty, but then we would have different channels that were bringing in the information to our source.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="816">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Are you not answering these questions with hindsight, now you know that this was highly placed person that your planning wouldn&#039;t have gelled?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="817">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I agree with you Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="818">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>With regard to your informer, I am not going to ask you for his or her identity, but was the informer who told you about Betty, the same informer that told you about Ngono?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="819">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Ngono?  You said Ngone?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="820">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>No, I said Ngono?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="821">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, they are different informers, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="822">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>And were those different informers also that you then approached to find out if the suspicions in the community had subsided?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="823">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson.  There is only informer that told us about the suspicion, not this one that we used to get Ngono.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="824">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>This informer of yours, was it a person placed within the structures of the ANC or was it a person placed within the structures of that community?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="825">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>He was just a Lesotho citizen, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="826">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>And the one about Ngono?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="827">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>He was also a Lesotho citizen.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="828">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>These border guards that you kept passing on a daily or weekly basis, did they know that you were policemen?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="829">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="830">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>So, if they saw you with other people in your vehicle, they would have assumed that these were people you were taking out of the country, because you were policemen?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="831">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson, because they knew us, they would not bother to know who the people were who were with us.   We would just pass through because they knew us, that is on the Republic side and on the Lesotho side.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="832">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Weren&#039;t they worried that you might be arresting Lesotho citizens, taking them out of the country to another jurisdiction where you didn&#039;t have any authority over them?  MR JANTJIE:   No Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="833">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>And they wouldn&#039;t want to enquire about that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="834">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson, they did nothing.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="835">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>I see.  Let&#039;s go to Roma University and the police station near there.  Who was Commander of that police station?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="836">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t know Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="837">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Do you say you don&#039;t know or you just don&#039;t remember?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="838">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t know Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="839">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Well, how did you establish contacts with policemen in that police station to gain their co-operation to help you with an operation like this one?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="840">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I will explain this way, Chairperson.  The Lesotho police or the police who were stationed at the places near Maseru, most of the time were the people who were close to our Commander and they used to come and attend the braai, party, at Ladybrand.  We would do likewise when they made braais in their areas, we would be invited.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="841">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	In that way I was trying to know them better, so that when I go to those places, I know certain people there, so that I can say &quot;do you remember me&quot;?  If that is the person that I met before, then I will make my request to him.  That is how we got to know the Lesotho police and that is why they helped us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="842">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Wouldn&#039;t it be that you say &quot;hi Motata, it is me&quot;, simply just go to a stranger and say &quot;do you remember me&quot;?  Why can&#039;t you say &quot;hi Motata, do you remember me&quot;?  That is what my colleague is trying to get at here?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="843">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I have a problem in remembering people&#039;s names, but we had codenames or we used to call ourselves &quot;swaer&quot;, that was the name that we used amongst ourselves, that was the people in the Republic and the people in Lesotho.  Most of the time you will meet many people and it would not be easy to remember his name, so you just say &quot;swaer&quot;, and then you continue with your discussion with the people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="844">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But wouldn&#039;t you think this is of importance, and I am speaking of Lesotho, correct me if I am mistaken, that is not a big country like South Africa and not to know everybody, but at least to know the Commanders of those few police stations in Lesotho, for the nature of the work that you are doing?  Wouldn&#039;t that be important, at least?  I am not saying know the whole Police Force, but the Commanders of the police stations?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="845">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that would be important Chairperson, but we were not working with the Station Commanders, we were working with people who were in the same field as us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="846">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So these braais were - you issued cordial invitations, excluded Commanders of the police stations?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="847">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson, we would not invite the Station Commanders.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="848">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, you may proceed, Mr Lax.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="849">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>So this was an informal arrangement, it wasn&#039;t a question of co-operation between the two Police Forces on a formal level?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="850">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I would say so, Chairperson.   Sometimes you will find that my Commander would have contact with the Commander in Maseru or maybe with somebody in the Headquarters of Maseru, so you would not invite people yourself.  That is how the braais were arranged.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="851">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Let&#039;s talk of Roma.  Was that Commander ever invited?  Let&#039;s not talk about generalities, we will take a very long time, because these are the generalities, you would agree with me, won&#039;t help us, because we are speaking of a specific case where somebody was abducted?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="852">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I agree with you Chairperson, I did not know the Commander at that station.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="853">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="854">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Did you know that there were formal Committees established in which the Security Forces and the Police of Lesotho met with representatives of the Police and Security Forces of South Africa on a regular basis to exchange information?  You didn&#039;t know that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="855">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I know only one Committee that was established.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="856">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>What was that Committee?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="857">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Although I don&#039;t know the name of that Committee, but I know there used to be meetings to share information, that is between the Commander of the Special Branch in Ladybrand and the Military Intelligence of Lesotho.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="858">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Mr van der Westhuizen was part of that Committee, one of his jobs was to serve on that Committee, together if my memory serves me correct, and I wouldn&#039;t want to impugn him incorrectly, and the Chair can correct me, but I understand your Commander was also a member of that Committee?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="859">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Not his Commander per se, the Head of the Branch?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="860">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Fouche?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="861">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Fouche, not Mr Robertshaw, because Mr Robertshaw was your Commander, direct Commander, would I be right?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="862">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I used to report to Mr Robertshaw because he was the second in command after Mr Fouche.   It is true, Mr Fouche as my Commander, used to attend those meetings.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="863">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I was just clearing it up so that there is no misunderstanding.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="864">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>So, you just happened to find any old two policemen at the police station that day, who you vaguely recognised and said &quot;hi &#039;swaer&#039;, we&#039;ve got a job to do, we want you to help us&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="865">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Like I have explained Chairperson, I had a problem in remembering people&#039;s names ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="866">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>No, no, not go back to that.  He is just, he is asking you this question having that in mind, that is why he said &quot;hi &#039;swaer&#039;, I&#039;ve got this problem, would you assist me&quot;, he is answering in the background that you have given.  Don&#039;t go back to it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="867">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="868">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>How did you know those two policemen would help you to arrest somebody?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="869">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>We already knew those people, but even though they refused, we would just go back.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="870">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>But why would you go back?  Why did you need their help to do the job at all?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="871">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>We had already decided, myself and Mr Thulo, that we were going to take Mr Ngono to the farm, because we decided that we are not going to recruit him there, that is at the University of Roma.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="872">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>You see, what if these policemen were good Lesotho policemen and they decided &quot;hang on a second, we cannot get involved in this sort of nonsense, we are taking a refugee, we are handing them over to our neighbour.  He has committed an offence here, he should be tried and arrested in this country?&quot;  It was possible that one of them might have said that to you, isn&#039;t it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="873">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I would not say so, but let me explain.  I would request the Chair to allow me to explain this issue.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="874">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You know what, I now experience problems and I&#039;m saying this with your best interest, that you are prolonging the clarifications they need from you, by introducing a lot of things.  You know some of the answers or questions I&#039;ve listened to needed a yes or no, but you want to give us this lots of background and out of that background more questions are asked around that background.  But I would not deny you that, but I want to alert you why you&#039;re now being asked questions for two days, that you are the source of this and it is not my wish that somebody should be asked questions this long.  But I&#039;ll allow you, if you so wish, to give those background explanations you wish to give.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="875">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I have heard what you say and I would retract that explanation.  May I please request the question from Mr Lax.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="876">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>It&#039;s very simple.  How did you know those people would cooperate with you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="877">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>We didn&#039;t know, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="878">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Probably the aroma of the meat would make then cooperate.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="879">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Maybe, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="880">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Weren&#039;t you taking a risk that they might turn around and say to you: &quot;What on earth do you think you&#039;re doing here, you can&#039;t do a thing like that?&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="881">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="882">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>So what you&#039;re saying is in essence is that you could operate with impunity in Lesotho, &#039;cause you had nothing to worry about, nobody would do anything to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="883">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="884">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Now these two policemen came with you to search this place.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="885">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="886">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>What did they do with the handgrenade?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="887">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>We left it there, Chairperson at the police station.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="888">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>You didn&#039;t find out whether anyone was prosecuted for its possession?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="889">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, we did not, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="890">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>When you never heard of Ngono again and he didn&#039;t contact you and you presumed that the recruitment had gone haywire, didn&#039;t go back to those policemen and say well, let&#039;s make a plan with him, let&#039;s arrest him, you have this handgrenade, at least get him deported, &#039;cause he&#039;s not cooperating?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="891">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson, we did not go back.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="892">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>You never made any efforts to look for him in Lesotho?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="893">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="894">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Thanks, Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="895">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Nor did you ask your informer, that is the one who informed you about KK, to say &quot;what has happened to KK?&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="896">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson, we did not ask.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="897">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Lax.  I see we have just gone five minutes past one, we would adjourn for lunch at this juncture, until 2 o&#039;clock.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="898">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="899">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>ON RESUMPTION</text>
		</line>
		<line number="900">
			<speaker>LESIZI MICHAEL  JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>(s.u.o.)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="901">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Before we proceed with Mr Jantjie, I&#039;m not certain about our availability tomorrow.  In &quot;our&quot; I mean the legal representatives, because it would appear we are adopting a snail&#039;s pace.  So I just wanted to enquire, because it would have been lovelier if we probably tried to conclude this matter, this application.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="902">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  Chairperson, Visser on record, we certainly share your sentiments and hopes.  Two issues.  On your question, yes, we will be available tomorrow.  I was informed that my attorney was asked whether we would be available until lunchtime, because I know that Members of the Committee normally prefer to sit not later than 1 o&#039;clock on a Friday, so that they could make their travel arrangements to get back to their homes within a reasonable time on a Friday afternoon, and I said yes of course we will be available, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="903">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	The only issue - so that covers that.  The only issue which we&#039;ll have to decide on before we adjourn is the issue of Mr Thulo, but I don&#039;t want to raise it now, I just want to mention it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="904">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Whilst you are at it, Mr Visser, I looked at the medical certificate, it would appear that he had to go back to work today, according to the doctor, but he has to come back for a check-up or something.  It&#039;s the 12th today.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="905">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Well I was given to understand something slightly different, I was given to understand that he&#039;s in bed and he&#039;s going to be there until the 12th, which is today.  But it might be that your reading of it is accurate.  Is your suggestion that we must try and get him here tomorrow, Chairperson?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="906">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I said if it&#039;s possible, I mean I don&#039;t know, but it reads as follows</text>
		</line>
		<line number="907" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;From work from the 9th up to and including 11/10/2000.  Date of return to work: 12/10/2000&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="908">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, you&#039;re quite correct.  What confused me is the next sentence which says he must return on the 21/10 for medical attention.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="909">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Ja, 11 or 12.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="910">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>But that could fit in with your reading of this, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="911">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Ja, I said at some stage you can find out, because it would be desirable if we were to know.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="912">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>However, if we go at the same pace, there&#039;s no possibility even of thinking that he might come on tomorrow.  But can we leave that decision until we adjourn this afternoon and see how far we get?  If we can finish with both these witnesses, if something wonderful happens and we do that, then we can certainly try to get him here overnight and lead his evidence tomorrow.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="913">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Chairperson, and then the second issue is really, well the third issue is, is there some indication to you at this stage whether my learned friends on the other side of the room are going to call any witnesses, because that&#039;s going to influence the situation as well.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="914">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s a good question, I&#039;ll pose it to them shortly, but let me find out about their availability tomorrow.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="915">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="916">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mapoma, I won&#039;t ask you, you are with, well as long as I am here you are here.  It&#039;s a given.  Mr Malindi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="917">
			<speaker>MR MALINDI</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I will be available tomorrow, my learned friend, Mr Koopedi, is not available henceforth, for the rest of the afternoon, but he might be available tomorrow.  In any event, I will be available tomorrow.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="918">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Just the last question raised by Mr Visser.  Are you people going to call any witnesses?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="919">
			<speaker>MR MALINDI</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, we have seriously considered that question and there is a strong possibility that we will call at least four witnesses, who will be very short witnesses.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="920">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>When you say that possibility, is it dependent on what you hear?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="921">
			<speaker>MR MALINDI</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, let me put it this way, we are going to call four witnesses to give very brief evidence, at least in chief, I think they would not last longer than fifteen minutes each.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="922">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  So we have an hour, we&#039;ll take it from 4 o&#039;clock this afternoon, because I think at four we&#039;ll have an indication whether we pick up our pace or not.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="923">
			<speaker>MR MALINDI</speaker>
			<text>As the Chairperson pleases.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="924">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Malindi.  Mr Jantjie, when we adjourned you were asked questions by Members of my Panel.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="925">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I do understand, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="926">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And my colleague on the right had indicated that he has finished asking questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="927">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson.  So we&#039;ll ask Mr Sibanyoni if he has any questions for clarification.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="928">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairperson, I do have.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="929">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Jantjie, I take it that you fully know the purpose of this Act, the TRC Act, was it fully explained to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="930">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="931">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>In other words, you are aware that you&#039;ve got to tell the truth and then also you&#039;ll have to show us that what you did was politically motivated.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="932">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I do, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="933">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>And whatever, or how gruesome the act may be, as long as you comply with those requirements you may be entitled to get amnesty.  You are fully aware of that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="934">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I do know Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="935">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  Let me start by following on what the Chairperson was asking you about the incident Mr Henri van der Westhuizen was talking about.  He told us that during that operation you people brought back or abducted Simon Mogetla, otherwise known as Comrade Old Timer.  Does it ring a bell to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="936">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I do remember Mr Mogetla.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="937">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>And when he was asked what eventually happened to Mr Mogetla, he said he was later sent back to Lesotho.  Do you also remember it like that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="938">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I do remember that he went back to Lesotho, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="939">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Sibanyoni, let me just - the precise name here.  I seem to have heard you say Magetla and he&#039;s speaking of Mogetla.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="940">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>His name is Mageta.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="941">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Simon?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="942">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Simon Mageta.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="943">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>It would appear we are speaking about the same person.  I just wanted to establish that.  Did you know him as Old Timer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="944">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="945">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="946">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>So do you now recall the incident where he was captured and brought back to South Africa, to Ladybrand?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="947">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I know little about Mr Mageta, his arrival at Ladybrand.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="948">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>Were you part of the team which brought him back from Lesotho to Ladybrand?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="949">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, I was not part of that group, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="950">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>Well according to Mr Henry van der Westhuizen, he says you were ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="951">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Sorry Chairperson, if I might just intervene.  I think my colleague is maybe a bit confused in the sense that my recollection of Van der Westhuizen&#039;s statement was that Mr Jantjie went together with some of the Vlakplaas people to a house where a shooting engagement happened.  However, another group of the same people had gone to Magetla&#039;s place and brought him back on the same evening and someone else had mistakenly thought the next morning, that Van der Westhuizen was partly responsible for bringing him back and congratulated him for that.  And I think that&#039;s where the confusion happens.  He then went on to say well, he didn&#039;t understand why he&#039;d been congratulated and at a later time he&#039;d got into trouble for being part of that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="952">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Just for clarity, I&#039;ve got a note here: &quot;Mr Simon Mogetla (as he called him) was abducted by another team&quot;, not the team that went into Lesotho where you were part of what he said initially.  Do you recall I said to you Mr Henri van der Westhuizen said you people left in two cars and your car proceeded to a house where there was a shoot-out and apparently this Simon was abducted, but not by those people who went in with Mr Henri van der Westhuizen, it was by another team.  So in other words, it&#039;s that you were not part of the abduction of Mr Mageta.  Okay?  I just wanted to be absolutely clear.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="953">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I do understand, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="954">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairperson, I stand corrected.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="955">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Now Mr Jantjie, on the occasion when Betty Boom was phoning Tax, were you with her or was she alone?  When she was phoning to say there will be people coming to her, when she was making arrangements.  Did she do it privately or were you present?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="956">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>We were with her, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="957">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>You said you trusted her, were you always with her, or was there some occasions where she would be alone?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="958">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>We were always with her, Chairperson, apart from when she wanted to go to the toilet, because we only had the outside toilet and we let her go alone there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="959">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>Where was she living during the time she was at Ladybrand?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="960">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>She was there at the farm, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="961">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>So what is the position, are there houses, if so, how many?  On the farm.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="962">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I remember that house, that is the main house, there was also one house that was used by the workers on the farm, if I&#039;m not mistaken Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="963">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>So there were also workers staying in the same house you were using?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="964">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="965">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>They were staying in their own houses on the farm?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="966">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>There was only farm worker who had his own house, not this one that we used.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="967">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>You are unable to give us the name of the farm, but whenever referring to that farm, what were you people saying?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="968">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>We never mentioned the name of the farm, Chairperson, because the arrangements about this farm were made by somebody, not myself.  That is Mr Jagga who would know, I think.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="969">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>Right.  These other people, that is Nomasonto, as well as Tax, what benefit would they have obtained for working for the police?  How did you convince them, what would they benefit by working for the police?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="970">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>We promised them that we will pay them every month, depending on the information that they shall have given to us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="971">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>Were there any figures mentioned as to how much they would get?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="972">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson, we did not mention or discuss any amount with them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="973">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>You said in case you failed to recruit these people you would have taken them back into Lesotho, if you fail to recruit a person you&#039;ll take that person back to Lesotho.  How would you prevent that person from continuing with his or her activities, from continuing with the struggle?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="974">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>May you please repeat the question, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="975">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>When you were asked that in case you didn&#039;t succeed to have these people recruited to work for the police, you would have returned them to Lesotho and just leave them.  My question is, then how would you prevent them from continuing with the struggle?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="976">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, we would use our informers so that we know their activities in that country.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="977">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>Right.  Are you saying there was never an operation where you were part of it and Vlakplaas or Eugene de Kock was also present?  Is that your evidence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="978">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Not a single one, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="979">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>And you were a member of the Special Branch at Ladybrand?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="980">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="981">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>Henri van der Westhuizen specifically said his task was to support the Special Branch at Ladybrand, what is your comment about his statement?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="982">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I agree with what you say, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="983">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>That you are aware that he was there to support the Special Branch?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="984">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>What I know about the people who used to come to the farm is that those were the people who would come and exchange information with us about the people, the MK people in Lesotho.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="985">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>He also said very often whenever the Special Branch went into Lesotho, the Special Forces as well as Vlakplaas was giving them backup or was assisting them.  What is your comment about that?  In other words, there would be some joint operations between Special Branch, Special Forces, as well as the team from Vlakplaas.  Like the one where there was some shoot-out, as well as where Mageta was abducted.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="986">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I dispute that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="987">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>Have you told this Committee everything you know insofar as the incidents for which you are applying for amnesty?  Have you given all the information, or is there anything which you want to say?  Because if I may explain, this is your last opportunity, the Amnesty Committee is the last opportunity to tell everything which happened.  What is your answer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="988">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="989">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="990">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="991">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Jantjie, from which area did Ms Betty Boom come from, do you know?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="992">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I do.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="993">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Where did she come from?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="994">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>She is from Bloemfontein, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="995">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I will tell you why I ask this, because on page 53 we have a statement by Buthelezi, Maj BB Buthelezi, commenced Maj BB Buthelezi, he says she vanished and if I follow you, you say she went back to Lesotho, but it would appear she was never seen there again.  You can have sight of page 53/54 of the comments by BB Buthelezi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="996">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I do see that part, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="997">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And you are steadfast that she was returned to Lesotho?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="998">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="999">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>After she said she was being recalled to Lusaka, have you heard of her again?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1000">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>We never heard anything from her or about her since the time she was called to Lusaka.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1001">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>After you made contact with her and she agreed to work for the Security Police, the informer who initially told you about her, did he tell you what has happened to her?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1002">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson, he did not tell us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1003">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Not you bear knowledge that she did in fact go back to Lusaka, as requested by her organisation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1004">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson, I don&#039;t know.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1005">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Point 7 on page 53, Buthelezi says Tax Sejanamane was actually arrested in QwaQwa, long before the disappearance of Betty.  In other words, what he&#039;s saying here is that he couldn&#039;t have been recruited because when Betty disappeared, Tax was somebody who was arrested in QwaQwa already.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1006">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I do see that point, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1007">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Let me just read it to you, I don&#039;t think I&#039;m giving you the correct version</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1008" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Tax Sejanamane was actually arrested in QwaQwa long before Betty arrived&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1009">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>I think he wanted to say in Lesotho.  You hear what I&#039;m saying?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1010">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1011">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What this is suggesting, I&#039;m not saying it is so, that is my reading of it, is that when you recruited Tax with the assistance of Ms Betty Boom, this couldn&#039;t be so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1012">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I say I read for the first time in this statement that Tax Sejanamane was arrested in QwaQwa.  When we recruited Tax we were helped by Betty.  I don&#039;t know whether Mr Buthelezi did which investigations, but what I know is that in December of that year we went to fetch Tax.  And it is true.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1013">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And he speaks of Mbulelo in the next paragraph, 8</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1014" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Coming to Mbulelo, in the first place he was involved in two operations which made him to be the most wanted man in South Africa&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1015">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>then he says:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1016" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;According to Jantjie he was sent to recruit Mbulelo somewhere in December&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1017">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>and he says:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1018" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;This is yet another lie, because Mbulelo left Lesotho around September 1987, and was always in the company of Tjweni Makupo, Maj Matle.  They only arrived in Lesotho early in February, after they were engaged in a shoot-out in Transkei, where Fana was killed.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1019">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>You get the reading, or is it translated?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1020">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I do understand, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1021">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And he says that, I&#039;m just paging over to 54, and the first sentence there</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1022" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Already Mbulelo was a wanted man and there is no way in which he could have just easily agreed to go to Betty.  And the truth is, Mbulelo was taken away from Roma by the Lesotho Police and handed him over to the South African Police at the Maseru Police Station, in the presence of his girlfriend.  That is why the ANC leadership was pressurising Lesotho Government through the UN and OAU, demanding that Mbulelo be deported to Lusaka or Tanzania.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1023">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Then what it means is that the girlfriend was there as well.  That&#039;s the import I want to put across to you.  And according to you, you say he was taken there alone from Roma, if I followed your evidence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1024">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1025">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t know what this sentence ... but for what it is worth, let me put it to you that you respond to it.  That would be 11</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1026" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;The Lesotho police who were on duty around the 15th March 1988, can also prove beyond reasonable doubt that they were the ones who handed over Mbulelo to the South African Police.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1027">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I dispute this, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1028">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did you, when Mbulelo for instance, was recruited by yourself and your colleagues, did he mention that he was ever incarcerated in QwaQwa?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1029">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1030">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What did you want to know from these people?  That is what is bothering me.  Because you get people, what you get, the tenure of your evidence sounds like this to me.  You abduct these people and you say: &quot;Would you work for us?&quot;  They agree, that&#039;s the end of the story.  That is bothering me because I don&#039;t think normally, I must be fair to you, as I sit here I have listened to so many stories and how the intelligence community operated, I&#039;ve heard many stories how informers were recruited, how askaris were recruited, but I&#039;m hearing this for the first time, that a person would normally just be approached: &quot;Will you work for us&quot;, and he agrees and this is the end of the story.  Wouldn&#039;t you get worried if you were seated where I am sitting and you have heard such stories and say now why is this intelligence community from Ladybrand operating in a vacuum, having their own modus operandi, wouldn&#039;t you be worried?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1031">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson, I would be worried.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1032">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>At least to say to Mbulelo Ngono: &quot;Where do you come from&quot;, get some background about this person, but I haven&#039;t heard anything of that nature.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1033">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.  When you meet a person you will write his full names and his MK names and those are the particulars that you would include in his file as an informer and he would explain to you that: &quot;I am working at a particular place&quot;.  For example, whether he was working in the Free State or in the Eastern Cape, you take all his particulars in full and where he comes from and in which year did he go to exile and how did he manage to cross over to Lesotho, and where did he apply for political asylum.  Those are the important issues that we would record about a person.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1034">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And wouldn&#039;t you make sure, for instance, that look, these people would work for us, not only find out &quot;hey, we will pay you, go back to Lesotho and work for us&quot;?  You must be absolutely certain that you have converted this person.  We are speaking of trained people here, trained people who left the country because they were dissatisfied about the regime and they wanted to overturn that regime, we are not speaking of ordinary disgruntled people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1035">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That is so, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1036">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Because this BB Buthelezi goes on further to say that</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1037" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Mbulelo had another name&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1038">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>I think he said Tebogo, I think so.  Yes, his combat name.  No, no, that&#039;s that Nomasonto Mashiya, her combat name was Tebogo.  Did you know that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1039">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, I did not know this name, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1040">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Now you had these informers, when they told you about this trio, did they tell you that this trio is Ms Betty Boom, Nomasonto Mashiya and Tax Sejanamane?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1041">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson, our informer told us about Betty Boom.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1042">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And when Betty spoke to Tax, for instance, Sejanamane, did she call him Tax Sejanamane?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1043">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>She called him Tax, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1044">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Do you know in that respect again, in all fairness to you, these MK cadres came from various parts of the country and what we have heard over the years is that they would have pseudo names, or MK names, and in most instances they didn&#039;t even know the colleagues whom they were operating with, what their real names were.  They wouldn&#039;t even know that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1045">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I agree with you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1046">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And this kind of information you didn&#039;t get.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1047">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson, I didn&#039;t have that kind of information.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1048">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And on page 51, it&#039;s an affidavit of Trevor James Sepho Pitso, he speaks of Betty having two houses.  Did you know that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1049">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson, I didn&#039;t know about the second house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1050">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Because in that paragraph 3, Trevor Pitso says</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1051" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;On arriving in Maseru, I called Betty&#039;s telephone number and had no response for the entire festive season period, whereupon I established from the Lesotho telecoms (LTC) how they could help me trace the address of the number and I was accordingly assisted in this regard.  I then visited the said house and the domestic worker explained to me that she last saw Betty on the 16th December 1987, when she allegedly left for one of her usual meetings.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1052">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>			On this occasion though the housekeeper expressed her concerns that it was unusual for Betty not to call about her prolonged absence from the house, so that proper housekeeping arrangements could be made.  It later emerged that Tax, allegedly resembling the South Africa Defence Force, (SADF) had collected her household belongings early in 1988, under the guise that Betty had sent for these to be removed.  This situation pertained as well as to her other house outside Maseru.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1053">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>What I&#039;m reading and what I want to put to you is that she was never seen again and according to what you have testified, is that you saw her, abducted her and returned her to Lesotho and you further made contact with her and the last contact is when Betty said she&#039;s required in Lusaka, to come back to Lusaka.  But the reading is that it was a once off thing.  That&#039;s my reading, I&#039;m not saying it&#039;s true, but in all fairness I must put this to you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1054">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I do not agree with what is written here, the statement that appears on this affidavit.  In other words, let me not just say I do not agree with what is written here.  I don&#039;t know anything about what is written here by Mr Pitso.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1055">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And this person went to Lusaka, apparently.  He says</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1056" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;In the meantime Betty&#039;s other colleagues in another machinery also seemed to be concerned about her failure to turn up for successive meetings, which would have been used to inform her about my presence in Lesotho.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1057">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>			Insofar as I am concerned, Betty was unheard of in our ranks in Lesotho, up till the time I left for Lusaka, Zambia in mid-1989.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1058">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I understand that, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1059">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>He would appear to be a comrade in the ranks of the liberation movement.  He was actually an MK.  And it would appear he&#039;s holding a high position within - probably you know him, he says he is</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1060" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I am currently resident in Bloemfontein and employed by the Department of Safety and Security&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1061">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>which is now your same department, would it be?  That&#039;s the Department of Safety and Security would be the same department, South African Police Services, under Steve Tshwete.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1062">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I do hear that, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1063">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>No, no, I&#039;m saying it would be, you would have the same boss, Mr Steve Tshwete, because you are the South African Police Services and he&#039;s the ... oh.  And in the Free State Provincial Government as Deputy Director, Security Administration.  So he&#039;s not just an ordinary person who was just in the MK, he returned to hold a high position within the administration of the South African Government.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1064">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1065">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And he says in paragraph 1</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1066" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;On or about the 24th December 1987, I arrived in Maseru, Lesotho, the main aim being to establish contact with Betty (Joyce Boom her real name)&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1067">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Did you know she was Joyce?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1068">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson, I knew that Joyce was one of her names.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1069">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did it concern you to know what eventually happened to these people?  I&#039;m asking you that question that you had established contact with them, they agreed to inform against their organisation and when they vanished from the face of Lesotho, did it concern you that they might go back and say this is what happened whilst we were in Lesotho?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1070">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Our decision, Chairperson, was that they could have returned to Lusaka, to their Headquarters and we will not be able to see them again, so as to meet the arrangements that we have made with them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1071">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Because you know my concern is that your farm was under threat, some other people would be sent back and that farm may have been attacked.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1072">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>That could happen, Chairperson, but that is not something that I thought about, more especially the attack on the farm which I did not know the owner.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1073">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Now lastly, Buthelezi says again in paragraph 3</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1074" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;She was always in close contact with Mphilo.  They both handled our monthly allowances.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1075">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>So what Buthelezi is saying is that she was not the only custodian of the allowances which were sent in monthly, they were handled jointly.  Did you know that kind of information, because you spoke about her financial dire straits?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1076">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson, I did not know that Betty and Mphilo were the people who handled the monthly allowances.  She only told us that most of the time she would receive money late and the money that she would receive was very little.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1077">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Jantjie.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1078">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1079">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Visser, anything arising from what the Panel has asked?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1080">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>No, thank you Chairperson, nothing I can&#039;t deal with in argument.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1081">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Mr Malindi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1082">
			<speaker>MR MALINDI</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I have a few aspects to canvass.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1083">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I&#039;m at a loss to understand what&#039;s going on now.  Who is Mr Malindi appearing for?  I thought Mr Koopedi was his instructing attorney.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1084">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>He just explained to us that Mr Koopedi won&#039;t be with us again, he&#039;s taking over.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1085">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, but Chairperson, two people can&#039;t cross-examine the same person.  We know that&#039;s the rule of evidence.  I mean, that would be a fatal irregularity if that happens.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1086">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>This is just matters ...(indistinct) Mr Visser.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1087">
			<speaker>MR MALINDI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.  Chairperson, am I expected to respond to the submission?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1088">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>No, no.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1089">
			<speaker>MR MALINDI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1090">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Jantjie, ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1091">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Could I first come in, Mr Malindi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1092">
			<speaker>MR MALINDI</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1093">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Jantjie, do not be surprised that you are asked questions by Adv Malindi, Mr Malindi arrived late yesterday, not late in the sense of late, we knew that he wouldn&#039;t make it timeously, but he&#039;s briefed by the firm which Mr Koopedi is in - you remember you were asked questions by Mr Koopedi, so this is an Advocate employed by Mr Koopedi.  Okay?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1094">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1095">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>They are here for the victims, so I don&#039;t want you to be surprised and say who is this gentleman, okay.  Mr Malindi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1096">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR MALINDI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1097">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Jantjie, in view of the evidence of Henri van der Westhuizen, which relayed to you by the Panel, I would like to ask you a few questions.  What car did you use when you went into Lesotho from your Ladybrand base? </text>
		</line>
		<line number="1098">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I have explained that we were using two cars.  I wasn&#039;t saying that we could not get another car.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1099">
			<speaker>MR MALINDI</speaker>
			<text>Was any of those two cars a 4X4?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1100">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1101">
			<speaker>MR MALINDI</speaker>
			<text>Were they both 4X4s?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1102">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1103">
			<speaker>MR MALINDI</speaker>
			<text>Is it - do you deny that you were part of the unit which Van der Westhuizen speaks about, which was involved in a shoot-out with some ANC members in Lesotho?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1104">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>He&#039;s already denied it, Chairperson.  He says he never operated with any Vlakplaas members.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1105">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he says categorically that he was never with Mr van der Westhuizen, Snor Vermeulen, Steve Bosch and Nortje, into Lesotho he was never.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1106">
			<speaker>MR MALINDI</speaker>
			<text>Was your unit from Ladybrand ever involved in a shoot-out inside the borders of Lesotho?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1107">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s an entirely irregular and irrelevant question.  I object to that question.  It does not arise from evidence, Chairperson, and I wish my learned friend to stick to what he undertook to do and that is to deal with issues arising.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1108">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>It never arose from what the Panel asked, Mr Malindi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1109">
			<speaker>MR MALINDI</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, maybe not ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1110">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What I&#039;m asking is that, because we are at the stage that we wanted some clarification and whoever asks questions from now must be based on what we asked, the three of us asked and nothing else.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1111">
			<speaker>MR MALINDI</speaker>
			<text>I understand that, Chairperson, but in view of the fact that Van der Westhuizen&#039;s evidence, I would have thought that I would be entitled to explore whether hew as involved in any shoot-out, and if the answer is yes, then it may collaborate Van der Westhuizen&#039;s evidence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1112">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>No, no, it cannot come out.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1113">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, with great respect, Van der Westhuizen, if you&#039;re going to rely on his evidence, we all know he&#039;s got to be called.  So the whole issue falls away.  Let Van der Westhuizen come and speak for himself and we&#039;ll cross-examine him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1114">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>We cannot allow that one.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1115">
			<speaker>MR MALINDI</speaker>
			<text>As the Committee pleases.  Chairperson, may I put a few, about two statements to the witness, which my learned friend omitted to put?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1116">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>With respect, Chairperson, I&#039;m going to object now, really.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1117">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1118">
			<speaker>MR MALINDI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson, no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1119">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR MALINDI</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1120">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Mr Mapoma.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1121">
			<speaker>FURTHER CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Just one, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1122">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	On page 54 of the paginated bundle, Mr Jantjie, the Chairperson read to you the paragraph or the sentence contained in paragraph 11 of the statement by Maj Buthelezi.  The first sentence in that paragraph was read to you and your response was that you dispute what is contained there.  What is it that you dispute there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1123">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I would allow you just to have that sentence before you say anything, Mr Jantjie.  Do you have it?  It&#039;s actually a sentence that - it&#039;s a longish paragraph, but I want you to be careful and not just say X, look at the statement and tell Mr Mapoma what you are disputing.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1124">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>When I say I dispute this, I was saying that what is written here in this paragraph is something that I don&#039;t know and I don&#039;t know how Mr Buthelezi got this, because I really don&#039;t know what is written here by Mr Buthelezi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1125">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The whole paragraph is disputed in toto, Mr Mapoma.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1126">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Jantjie, the Chairperson read to you the sentence which says</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1127" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;The Lesotho police who were on duty around the 15th March 1988, can also proved beyond reasonable doubt that they were the ones who handed over Mbulelo to the then South African Police.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1128">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>And that is all that the Chairperson read, and requested your response.  You said you dispute this.  You&#039;re explanation is not ...(indistinct) enough.  He was referring to only this, not the paragraph.  Do you dispute what is contained in this sentence at all?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1129">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I was saying what Mr Buthelezi says is beyond my knowledge.  If those policemen can be called who were there on the 15th March, maybe they will say what happened there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1130">
			<speaker>MR LAX</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, could I just interpose here?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1131">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	The issue of the 15th of March, this thing happened 20 years ago, more, is it not possible you might be making a mistake, that it might have happened on the 15th of March and instead of being one or two weeks after you took Betty, it might have been one or two months after you took Betty?  The time, maybe it&#039;s got mixed up in your head, is that not possible?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1132">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1133">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m not clear still, what is it exactly that you dispute in this sentence?  Do you dispute that the police of Lesotho who were on duty on the 15th of March can prove that Mbulelo was handed over to the South African Police?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1134">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I&#039;m trying to say that if those policemen who were on duty on the 15th of March 1988, if they gave Mbulelo over to the South African Police, that can be true, but not to me because the last time I saw Mbulelo was in December 1987.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1135">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mapoma, my understanding is that he disputes the date.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1136">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, thank you, Chairperson.  Thank you, Mr Jantjie.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1137">
			<speaker>MR JANTJIE</speaker>
			<text>I thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1138">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Anything further?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1139">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson, nothing further.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1140">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR MAPOMA</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1141">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Mr Visser.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1142">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.  No, I&#039;ve got no questions to the witness arising, can he be excused?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1143">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I wanted to say that, but I have to establish from you whether there was anything.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1144">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>No, thank you Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1145">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Mr Jantjie, you are excused.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1146">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1147">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, could they swop chairs, because I wish to call Mr Jagga as the next witness.  He wishes to address you in Afrikaans.  He has no objection to taking the oath.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1148">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Visser, could I do this?  I sent people to the bank, I just wanted to find out if they have problems ...(indistinct), could we adjourn whilst they do that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1149">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>