<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY HEARING</type>
	<startdate>2000-10-23</startdate>
	<location>JOHANNESBURG</location>
	<day>1</day>
	<names>NICOLAAS JOHANNES VERMEULEN</names>
	<case>AM4358/96</case>
	<matter>SWAZILAND OPERATIONS - MK BROWN AND MK GEORGE</matter>
					<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=54557&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/2000/201023jb.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="232">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Good morning.  It&#039;s Monday the 23rd of October 2000, and we&#039;re here to hear the applications of, inter alia, Mr Vermeulen.  I believe we&#039;ll start with that application.  I&#039;ll ask the Members of the Panel to put themselves on the record.  I am Chris de Jager.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>ADV SIGODI</speaker>
			<text>Advocate Sigodi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m J B Sibanyoni, Member of the Committee.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Wim Cornelius, I&#039;ll be acting for the applicants, Nicolaas Johannes Vermeulen, Andries Johannes van Heerden and Lionel Snyman.  Thank you, Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairman.  I&#039;m Zuko Mapoma, the Leader of Evidence for the Amnesty Committee.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Anybody appearing for the victims?  Do you know whether anybody is appearing for victims in the Vermeulen matter?  Let me start with that one.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Not in this particular matter, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  We wish to apologise for starting late, unfortunately one of my colleagues had problems with the traffic and robots not working, but we hope that we&#039;ll continue right through until 1 o&#039;clock at least, with the hearing now, we won&#039;t take a tea break.  Mr Cornelius, could you start.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Judge.  I call Nicolaas Johannes Vermeulen.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Vermeulen, will your evidence be in Afrikaans or English, or what language?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>Afrikaans, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Do you swear that the evidence you will give in this matter will be the truth, the whole truth and nothing else but the truth?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker>NICOLAAS JOHANNES VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Vermeulen, you have completed an application on Form 1 in terms of Section 18 of the Act, which has been submitted to the TRC, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>During the incident that took place to which we will refer to, were you in the service of the South African Police, as defined in Section 20(2)(b) and 20(2)(f) of the Act?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>You say these incidents took place in 1976, where were you then, which section of the Police?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>At the Special Task Force of the South African Police, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>And just for clarity for the Committee, I understand there has already been an application by your other comrades of the Task Force, but you were not subpoenaed to attend that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>I understand you also contacted the TRC people in Cape Town and enquired why you were not subpoenaed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>And what were you informed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>That I was not involved there, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>I see.  But you were involved there, that is why you applied?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You&#039;re referring to the application of, inter alia, Brig Viktor and Wandrag and the hearing that was held here in Johannesburg, I think during the period the 3rd to the 31st of May, and I think this particular one was heard on the 7th and 8th day and I don&#039;t know whether a decision has already been publicised in this matter.  I don&#039;t know whether the Evidence Leader could help us in this regard.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I have made some enquiries from Cape Town, but unfortunately at this stage, the Evidence Analyst was still trying to find out what the outcome of that application is.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes I think you&#039;ll be able to find out from Mr Coetzee&#039;s office, because I believe there was a decision given in the matter of Wandrag, and the hearing was referred to as: &quot;MK Brown and MK George Hearing&quot;.   Right.  Could you continue, Mr Cornelius.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	You are now applying on the same merits as the Judge has referred to now, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Your was your direct Commander?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>Gen Wandrag, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>And under whom did you serve?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>Under Capt Strydom, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Where did this incident take place?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>It was in Swaziland, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Close to the border post?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson, Oshoek.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>What were your instructions?  What did you have to do?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>My part of the operation was, as I understood it, that I would act as a backup if there were any problems, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>I see.  Were you issued with a firearm?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>What type of firearm?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>An RPD, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Is this a weapon from Eastern origin?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Was that standard issue?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>Yes Chairperson, for that operation, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Can you briefly tell the Committee what happened at the scene.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>What I can recall Chairperson, we more than once went in.  I think the first time we came out because there was no-one there and the second time they called us back we went back in.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>When you say you went in, you mean you went over the border?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Did you cross the border legally?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>No, we crossed the border illegally.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>You went in once and then came out again and then you went back in?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="61">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>What happened then?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="62">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>Then the vehicle arrived there.  There was a shooting.  I did not participate in the shooting.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="63">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>How many people were there in the vehicle?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="64">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>As far as my memory serves me, I think there were two persons, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="65">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Were those the targets?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="66">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="67">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Did everyone shoot at the vehicle?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="68">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>The ambush group, yes, they fired at the vehicle.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="69">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Was this vehicle led into an ambush?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="70">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="71">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>You say you did not fire shots?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="72">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="73">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Were the people then killed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="74">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>Yes, the people were killed, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="75">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>What happened then?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="76">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>We withdrew and we went back over the border and we went back to Pretoria.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="77">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Did you see the vehicle exploding or being set alight?  Did you see this yourself?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="78">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>As far as I can recall Chairperson, I only heard about it, I was not at the scene myself.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="79">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>But the vehicle burnt?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="80">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="81">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>And you say in your application that petrol was thrown, is this an inference you draw or did you see this personally?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="82">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>I did not see them setting the vehicle alight, but I know some of the members took petrol along with them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="83">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>So you do not have any personal knowledge that the vehicle was burnt?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="84">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="85">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>You did not participate in the setting alight of the vehicle?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="86">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="87">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Did you then move back to the Republic?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="88">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="89">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>And did you have a debriefing afterwards?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="90">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>We just withdrew to Pretoria, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="91">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Against whom did you think you were acting?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="92">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>Against the ANC soldiers, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="93">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>I see on page 9 of your application you say</text>
		</line>
		<line number="94" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I later heard at Vlakplaas&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="95">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Were you then transferred to Vlakplaas later?  ...(transcriber&#039;s interpretation)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="96">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="97">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>And what did you hear there?  You just heard later that they were attached to the ANC.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="98">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="99">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>You apply for amnesty for conspiracy to commit murder of the two persons.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="100">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="101">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Your participation therein.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="102">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="103">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>The damage to property, the vehicle.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="104">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="105">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>And the illegal crossing of the country&#039;s borders.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="106">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="107">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>And all delicts or offences which might flow from there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="108">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="109">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>You at all times, I assume, just carried out your orders?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="110">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="111">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Were disciplinary steps ever taken against you for your participation in this incident?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="112">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="113">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>You believed that you were acting in the interest of your country?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="114">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="115">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>You did have any personal malice towards the victims?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="116">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>No, I did not, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="117">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>And you have disclosed all the facts according to your knowledge?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="118">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="119">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>Did you receive any reward except for your salary?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="120">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="121">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="122">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR CORNELIUS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="123">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Cornelius, you apply for conspiracy to commit murder, but in fact people were killed, so it went further than a conspiracy, the result was in fact murder.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="124">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>You&#039;re quite correct, Judge.  The conspiracy and the murder itself of the two persons, because he was part and parcel of the operation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="125">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Ja, but if he would, for instance, if we would consider it to be murder and we would give amnesty for murder, that would include the conspiracy already.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="126">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I think that is true.  It&#039;s splitting of hairs to add the conspiracy.  I agree, Judge.  Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="127">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Who gave you the order to act in this matter?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="128">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>The initial order came from Capt Strydom, that was ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="129">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Was he the operational Commander?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="130">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="131">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But in charge of the  whole operation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="132">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>Gen Wandrag.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="133">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did Gen Wandrag enter Swaziland, or what was the position?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="134">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>No, he didn&#039;t enter Swaziland, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="135">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So he stayed at the border and Strydom and the other people went into Swaziland?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="136">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="137">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Can you remember who accompanied you into Swaziland?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="138">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>It&#039;s difficult to recall all the people, but I know for a fact it was Capt Strydom, I think there was a Capt Fourie and the other people are very vague to me, Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="139">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>How many people went across the border, approximately?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="140">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>I think there were about 10 people, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="141">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>How long have you been a member of the Task Force?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="142">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>I was - as it started, I was a member, in &#039;75, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="143">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And you stayed in the Task Force up to when?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="144">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>Till &#039;85, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="145">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Were there any other policemen present as far as you can remember?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="146">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>The only other one that was not from our unit was Mr Viktor, I think at that time he was in charge of the Security Branch, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="147">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did he go into Swaziland, or did he also remain at the border?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="148">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>He also remained at the border, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="149">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>How did you know that you were going to meet with these MK soldiers?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="150">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>We received the message from Mr Strydom that we had to cross the border, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="151">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, what I want to find out is, you as the Task Force, how did you happen to know as the Task Force, that there are MK operatives who can be met at that point where you met them?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="152">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>I think that information must have come from Mr Viktor and that went to Gen Wandrag and then from Wandrag to Strydom and then to us, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="153">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>You are not aware as to whether that information came from the MK ranks at all?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="154">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="155">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>You are not aware whether there was an informer from MK who was involved in giving this information to the Task Force?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="156">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="157">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>You see I&#039;m asking this question because there is a statement which was made in the Human Rights Violations Committee, which suggested that a certain Victor, who was an askari, gave information to the South African Police about the car that was going to travel there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="158">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>That could have been so Mr Chairman, but at that stage we were uniformed branch people, just working on instructions, so we wouldn&#039;t have been involved with the collection of any information, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="159">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Thank you Chairperson, no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="160">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR MAPOMA</text>
		</line>
		<line number="161">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Anybody appearing for the victims in this  matter?  No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="162">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>Mr Vermeulen, do you still recall who amongst your members was having petrol?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="163">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>It is difficult to recall that Mr Chairman, because the first time we went in some people might have carried it, it is very difficult to say specifically some person carried the petrol, but I must say, I think it would have been the people that was involved in the shooting of the car.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="164">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>If you can still recall, was the team consisting of only white members, or were there both white and black members of the Special Forces?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="165">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>That was only white members, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="166">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairperson, no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="167">
			<speaker>ADV SIGODI</speaker>
			<text>The route that you took into Swaziland, you say you crossed the border illegally?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="168">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="169">
			<speaker>ADV SIGODI</speaker>
			<text>And did you come back illegally at all the times that you went in and out of Swaziland?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="170">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>That correct, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="171">
			<speaker>ADV SIGODI</speaker>
			<text>Did you have passports just in case you were caught?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="172">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="173">
			<speaker>ADV SIGODI</speaker>
			<text>And where did you cross this border?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="174">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>It must have been nearby Oshoek, because we went down to Oshoek.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="175">
			<speaker>ADV SIGODI</speaker>
			<text>And was there a road there, or how did you cross it, how did you get across and how did you get back across the border?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="176">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>We walked in from wherever.  I can&#039;t remember if we started from a certain spot.  What I can remember is we got off the vehicles and then we walked and we crossed the fence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="177">
			<speaker>ADV SIGODI</speaker>
			<text>And was there a car waiting for your on the other side?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="178">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="179">
			<speaker>ADV SIGODI</speaker>
			<text>And how did you get to the place where the victims were?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="180">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>It wasn&#039;t very far to walk, it was about two or three kilometres that we had to walk in, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="181">
			<speaker>ADV SIGODI</speaker>
			<text>And you came back on foot as well?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="182">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="183">
			<speaker>ADV SIGODI</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  Thank you, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="184">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>Just one, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="185">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Vermeulen, are you also known as Snor Vermeulen?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="186">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="187">
			<speaker>MR SIBANYONI</speaker>
			<text>Okay, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="188">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Were tracers also fired?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="189">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>Not as far as I know Mr Chairman, I don&#039;t think so, no.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="190">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Vermeulen, according to the previous evidence, Viktor was in fact, General or Brig Viktor was in fact at the border, also Brig Wandrag, Strydom and I think Visser, two Visser members, Schalk Visser from Middelburg Security Police and another Visser.  I think he was stationed somewhere on the Eastern Rand or somewhere.  Can you remember then?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="191">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>Now that you mention Mr Visser, yes Mr Chairman, I can recall that very vaguely, because I hadn&#039;t had any chance to refresh my memory with any of the other people that were present there, Mr Chair.  But if, I would say Mr Visser from Middelburg, ja he could have also been there, &#039;cause that was their area that they worked.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="192">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Just for the record, the Task Force wasn&#039;t a Force involved in the Security sector of the Police?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="193">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairman, in the beginning it was and when Gen Wandrag took over we were sent back to the Uniform Branch, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="194">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And what kind of work did you do in fact?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="195">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>At that stage we were mostly training people and I think that was one of our first operations or task that was given to us.  It might be the second one, I&#039;m not sure Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="196">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The Task Force, as far as the evidence we had previously, was in fact a Force used for emergency cases such as the Silverton Bank Robbery, for instance.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="197">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="198">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Where hostages were taken.  You were involved there and I think, earlier on even when the hostage was taken here in Johannesburg, this Riley hostage.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="199">
			<speaker>MR VERMEULEN</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="200">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Ja.  Any further questions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="201">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>Nothing, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="202">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Is he only applying for this one incident?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="203">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>;   It&#039;s only for this one incident according to my instructions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="204">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The Chesterville incident has already been heard?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="205">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s been finalised, Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="206">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Ja.  Are there any other outstanding matters where Mr Vermeulen is involved in?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="207">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>There might only be one matter which is the Supply of Weapons to Inkatha, but I understand from the TRC that has not been enrolled, or ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="208">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Well I don&#039;t know, isn&#039;t Mr van Heerden applying for that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="209">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>I think most of my applicants will be applying for that, but that will be one of the things I will address in the letter to your good self.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="210">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So that&#039;s not on the role for this hearing?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="211">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>It&#039;s not on the role for this hearing, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="212">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Okay, thank you Mr Vermeulen, you are excused.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="213">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
		<line number="214">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>I have no further witnesses and that is the case for the applicant.  Thank you, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="215">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Any other witnesses to be called?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="216">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>There are no other witnesses, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="217">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Right.  We&#039;ll reserve judgment and give a decision as soon as we can manage to do so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="218">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MACHINE SWITCHED OFF</text>
		</line>
		<line number="219">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>ON RESUMPTION</text>
		</line>
		<line number="220">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Perhaps I should give you the opportunity to address us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="221">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS ADDRESSES</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Sibanyoni.  I&#039;ll be very brief.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="222">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	It&#039;s my submission that the application complies with the necessary statutory provisos in terms of Section 18 of the Act.  It is my submission that my applicant made a full disclosure to all the facts within his knowledge.  It is clear that he had an instruction which came from high up in the Police Force.  He carried out his instructions and he was at all times acting with a political motive, in that he was acting against so-called enemy of the government of the time.  And it is clear that there were no disciplinary actions taken against him at any time and he wasn&#039;t paid any remuneration or bonus for his acts.  So it&#039;s my submission that he fully qualifies to be granted amnesty.  Thank you, Mr Chair.  Thank you, Mr Sibanyoni.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="223">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mapoma?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="224">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>I have no submissions to make Chairperson, in this particular incident.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="225">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO SUBMISSIONS BY MR MAPOMA</text>
		</line>
		<line number="226">
			<speaker>MR MAPOMA</speaker>
			<text>But Chairperson, having said so, I&#039;m just looking at this application, I understand the Act of Supply of Weapons to the IFP is a chamber matter and it is my view, Chairperson, that if perhaps the Committee would hear evidence in as far as that is concerned, that would assist in expediting that incident as well, because now we have to write a request for further particulars to the applicant and then he has to write back in response thereto, but if now the evidence can be led and be heard now, perhaps that can be saved, time can be saved on that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="227">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Cornelius, what would your point of view be?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="228">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>I would have loved to have assisted the Evidence Leader in this respect, but the problem is you would note, as far as Vermeulen is concerned, it&#039;s not bound into this application, so I didn&#039;t consult on it, so I didn&#039;t prepare anything on it.  As far as the other applicants are also concerned, I felt and I understood that this would not be heard at this hearing, so I did not prepare.  But what I do suggest, if there&#039;s any particulars that my learned colleague would want, I&#039;d gladly supply it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="229">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Could you perhaps consider it during lunchtime and if there&#039;s time, whether you could consult and see whether we could dispose of that as well?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="230">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m prepared to do that, Mr Chairman, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="231">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Right.  Okay then this could stand down and we&#039;ll consider it after lunch, whether we&#039;ll be able to hear the Supply of Weapons application, and could you then proceed with the next applicant.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="232">
			<speaker>MR CORNELIUS</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Chair.  I wish to call Daniel Lionel Snyman.</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>