<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY HEARINGS</type>
		<location>BLOEMFONTEIN</location>
		<names>MR BOKABA</names>
		<matter>Assault/Torture of detained political activists in police holding cells on Fountains Street, Bloem.</matter>
					<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=54621&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/bloem/bloem4_ngo4.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="628">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR MEMANI:   (cont)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>Let me put it shortly.  I said that it was early 1987, somewhere in February, if I remember well.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>I understand that he could have known Sir, because he knew that Loots was the commanding officer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Now, on your version, he saw Loots only once, is that correct? And he never saw him again.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>That is my understanding.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And you also do not dispute that it was burnt down by Ngo and Selahla?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>I dispute that Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>By whom was the house burnt on your version?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Why would it be Ngo alone?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And he also knows that Selahla was present when he burnt the house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>Selahla disputes that Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>How can you dispute that Selahla was present when the house was burnt down?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Can you dispute it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>I say he was not there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>How do you know that he was not there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I believed him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Now, why do you believe Selahla when he denies that he was not present?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, I want to object against that question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>This was a policeman who worked with him as a unit for how many years?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>You can say about three Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Carry on.  Why ...[inaudible]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>I worked with Selahla in Mamelodi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And you obviously dispute that you were involved in the burning of the house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Selahla?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>But Mr Chairman ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, may I proceed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Now, can you deny that the house was burnt down by Ngo and Selahla?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="61">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="62">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>As the Chair pleases.  Now you cannot dispute - you do not dispute that Louisa Mbongo was  member of MAYO, do you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="63">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="64">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And you do not dispute that her house was burnt down as a result of the fact that Nono, I beg your pardon - you do not dispute the fact that her house was burnt down as a result of the fact that she organised a sympathy protest against the burning house of the - against the burning of the house of Louisa Mbongo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="65">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="66">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And this house - these houses were petrol-bombed.  Now, you also do not dispute that obviously, do you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="67">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>I know - I know nothing about those houses.  Those are the allegations made by your client.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="68">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Now ordinarily, houses were petrol-bombed in the course of political conflict, do you dispute that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="69">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>May you please repeat your question Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="70">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Ordinarily, house were petrol-bombed in the course of political conflict.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="71">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="72">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>May you repeat your question Sir?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="73">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, is my learned friend putting that as a fact - is there going to be evidence before this Committee about that?  I object against the question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="74">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="75">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="76">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>Do you say that I dispute that houses were burnt during the political unrest?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="77">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="78">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>Does he speak specifically about the houses which his client alleges that they were burnt of he speaks under general circumstances?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="79">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Under general circumstances.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="80">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, houses were burnt under general circumstances.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="81">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Why?  Because of political unrest or because of other reasons?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="82">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="83">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>Let me answer that question in this way.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="84">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I ...[inaudible] received the ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="85">
			<speaker>INTERPRETER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="86">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>During the time of unrest, some of the houses were burnt because of political reasons.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="87">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, I just want to make the point that on page 45 of bundle A, Mr Ngo himself has said that he burnt a house because of a personal grudge and that application was withdrawn, so the statement made by my learned friend should be qualified for instance by an incident where his own client was involved.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="88">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="89">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="90">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>Petrol-bombs were used in the township.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="91">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>But Captain, why do you seem to have difficulty with dealing with what you understand to be the essence of the creation, that these petrol bombs were used in political - in the political context.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="92">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="93">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="94">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>That is so, at times they were burnt because of personal grudges.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="95">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Now, which incidents do you know of where houses were petrol-bombed because of personal grudges?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="96">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>Should I explain specific houses and the owners of those houses?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="97">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="98">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="99">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And you only know about the one which Ngo refers to in his applications, in his application?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="100">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="101">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="102">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>May you please explain your question Sir?  Put your question clearly Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="103">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="104">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="105">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>The question is simple.  Where petrol bombs were used in the course of arson, security branch would have an interest in the matter?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="106">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>What kind of interest are you talking about?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="107">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>But Captain, you are a Captain you know ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="108">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="109">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>That is the obvious interpretation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="110">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="111">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>As the Chair pleases.   Where houses were petrol-bombed, security branch would have an interest in the matter in the sense that they would have cause to investigate the matter?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="112">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, they would investigate but let me explain it this way.  There was a special task team which was stationed in Mamelodi police station.  That special task team was working directly to investigate those kinds of incidents.  Security branch was not part and parcel of the investigative team, those are the people who would</text>
		</line>
		<line number="113">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>investigate the dockets.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="114">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Now, we know ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="115">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Who was in charge of this team or who were the members of this team?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="116">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="117">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Now, before you brought in the qualification, you conceded that special branch, rather security branch would have an interest in investigating the matter.  In what sense would security branch investigate the matter?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="118">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="119">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Now, it is obvious that the special investigative team would carry out the investigation insofar as the prosecution is concerned and that security branch would carry out the investigation insofar as the gathering of information relating to security matters is concerned.  Do you dispute that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="120">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, the security branch would gather the information - not to investigate the case and to carry the docket.  They would gather the information and then pass it over to the relevant people or structure, then those people would do the arrest, then they will take those people to court.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="121">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And on the other hand, security branch would also detain people on strength of the suspicion that they were involved in incidents like petrol-bombing houses?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="122">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>To detain people because of taking part in the petrol-bombing was not part and parcel of the security branch, they would only take that information to that task team which I mentioned.  There were a state of emergency where members of the security branch detained people because of the information they were able to gather.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="123">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Such as that persons were associated with certain political organisations and could possibly have been responsible for the petrol-bombing of certain houses and other properties?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="124">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>They would do that because of the information at their disposal.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="125">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Now, why do you dissociate yourself from security branch because you were a member of the security branch, why do you say &quot;we arrested them on the strength of such information if we had such information&quot;?   Why do you use the third person?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="126">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>Let me explain it this way ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="127">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="128">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="129">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="130">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="131">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="132">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>That was a while ago Sir, later on he said that security branch did arrest people and they would arrest people on the strength of such information, they would detain them under the security branch and this is ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="133">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>When there was a state of emergency they would detain people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="134">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="135">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>the security branch.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="136">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="137">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>During the state of emergency yes,  I was one of those people who were detaining people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="138">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And otherwise, when people had committed crimes when it was not during the state of emergency?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="139">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>It was the work of the special investigative team during the other incidents.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="140">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>But Mr Bokaba, there was security legislation in terms of which people were detained without trial, which was carried out by the security branch.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="141">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="142">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>But you know, that legislation was a matter of public knowledge. Since around 1976, it had become common knowledge that there was security legislation in terms of which people could be detained without trial and you were a constable, you should know</text>
		</line>
		<line number="143">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>about that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="144">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>I explained to you that during the state of emergency, we detained people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="145">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="146">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="147">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And on your version, you and Selahla were the people primarily responsible for Mamelodi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="148">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="149">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And you do not have the slightest idea about these houses?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="150">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="151">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="152">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="153">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>Do you know of any houses that - in Mamelodi which were bombed by members of the security branch?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="154">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>No English translation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="155">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>Do you know of any houses in Mamelodi which were bombed by members of the security branch?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="156">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="157">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="158">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="159">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="160">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible]  Scheepers Marudi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="161">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>Did they tell you it had been bombed by the security branch?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="162">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>Sorry?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="163">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>Did they tell you it had been bombed by the security branch?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="164">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>Did they tell me?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="165">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="166">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="167">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, they did tell me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="168">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>When did they tell you that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="169">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>I heard later from Captain Hechter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="170">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>When was that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="171">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>That was after a long time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="172">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Why do you say in your affidavit that</text>
		</line>
		<line number="173" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;as far as my knowledge goes, no houses as far as my knowledge goes, were bombed by members of the security branch&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="174">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>I was talking about myself.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="175">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Page, sorry - page 45, para 3.4</text>
		</line>
		<line number="176" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I categorically deny 3.4 that any of the houses where I was supposedly involved as mentioned in his application, were ever bombed by myself or as far as my knowledge goes, by members of the security branch, Northern Transvaal&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="177">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>You are referring to ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="178">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Where I was personally involved.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="179">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>You are referring only to the two houses in question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="180">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="181">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>The houses mentioned by the applicant.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="182">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>I explained that I heard later about those houses.  I</text>
		</line>
		<line number="183">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="184">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>But Mr Chairman, in his ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="185">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>I understand the context different, I understand you.  I think I must take back my question, I misunderstood the paragraph.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="186">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="187">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="188">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="189">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="190">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="191">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="192">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="193">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>In respect of what ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="194">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="195">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And for what acts have you applied for amnesty?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="196">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>That is assault.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="197">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Assault on who?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="198">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>The same person called Scheepers Marudi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="199">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Yes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="200">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="201">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Now, where did these incidents take place?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="202">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="203">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, before we go into all the detail of</text>
		</line>
		<line number="204">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>where Makupi and Maake and Sefola were arrested and where they were taken, I have the amnesty application of Captain Bokaba in front of me.  You have heard evidence about this incident.  The evidence in his application accords with the evidence you have heard.  The place was Hammanskraal, close to Pienaars Rivier ...[intervention] </text>
		</line>
		<line number="205">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="206">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>You would remember that.  And then ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="207">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="208">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="209">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="210">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>application of Captain Bokaba and the other incident ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="211">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="212">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>The incident, Makupi, Sefola and Maake.  That was the one incident ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="213">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The murder.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="214">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, the murder, the murder.  The murder happened there.  And then there was the murder of the unknown ANC cadre which you also have heard evidence of Captain van Vuuren and Captain Hechter and that took place in Boputhatswana.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="215">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="216">
			<speaker>INTERPRETER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="217">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="218">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="219">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="220">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="221">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="222">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Now, you told us that these people were arrested in Mamelodi, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="223">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>I said not all of them were arrested in Mamelodi, not all of them were arrested from Mamelodi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="224">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Now, who was arrested in Mamelodi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="225">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="226">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And these people were associated with activities in Mamelodi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="227">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>Do you want me to explain the cases in detail or what?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="228">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Look, the ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="229">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>I think the question is,  these people were political activists in Mamelodi engaged in some - in political activities of some</text>
		</line>
		<line number="230">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>kind in the area of Mamelodi where you worked.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="231">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Scheepers Marudi was an activist in Mamelodi.  I think Makupe and Maake were activists in Mamelodi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="232">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Was Mr Ngo involved in any of these incidents, the arrest of Maake or Sefola or Makupi or Scheepers Marudi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="233">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>I thank you for that question because I was asking myself that question, that if Ngo was working with me, I believe that he could have made an application for amnesty in regard to those acts.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="234">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="235">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>No, Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="236">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="237">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="238">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Was Selahla involved in these ... [intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="239">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>Selahla.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="240">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Selahla?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="241">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="242">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The two of you were both involved.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="243">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, the two of us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="244">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Was Loots also involved?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="245">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="246">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>Loots was not present.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="247">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Did you get your commands from Loots to do these things?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="248">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="249">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>This surely relates to the credibility of your previous witness?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="250">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, but Mr Chairman, we ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="251">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="252">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="253">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The question did not relate to Fikter, it related to Loots as to whether Loots gave orders.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="254">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, but Mr Chairman, I think the question went further Mr Chairman, but if my learned could repeat the question perhaps then we could deal with that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="255">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Did you get your orders from Loots?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="256">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>No, Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="257">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Who did you get your orders from?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="258">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="259">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="260">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="261">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Now, you mentioned three incidents, did you get your instructions on each case from Hechter?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="262">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="263">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="264">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>We received instructions from Captain Hechter in all</text>
		</line>
		<line number="265">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>three incidents.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="266">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And besides these incidents, are there any other incidents for which you might have to apply for amnesty in respect of which you made a mistake of not applying earlier on?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="267">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, I object against this question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="268">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="269">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>On the basis of my instructions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="270">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="271">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="272">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>I made application for amnesty for the three things which I took part in and there are no other incidents which I took part in.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="273">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Besides yourself, Selahla and Hechter, who else was involved in these incidents?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="274">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="275">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="276">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="277">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, may I beg leave to hand the amnesty application to Captain Bokaba, then he can read to you from the amnesty application exactly who was present in what incident.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="278">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="279">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="280">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="281">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="282">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>That is Hechter, Paul van Vuuren, Joma Masela and Danny Selahla.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="283">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="284">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="285">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Carry on.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="286">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="287">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Bokaba, do you know if the applicant had been a member of the security branch at Bloemfontein prior to his involvement with Pretoria?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="288">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="289">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="290">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I used to see him at the barracks, I was staying with him at the barracks.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="291">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Did you see him at the barracks right through 1987 up to 1989?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="292">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>I would not say all the time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="293">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>But he was living there during 1987 to 1989?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="294">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="295">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="296">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I was staying at the barracks.  Yes, I was staying there at the barracks.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="297">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="298">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="299">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="300">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>He came to me in - he approached me in 1987 to tell me that he wants to work at the security branch.  We met on that incident.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="301">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And during 1988, he was living at the barracks?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="302">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="303">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>During 1989, he was living at the barracks?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="304">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="305">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="306">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>I was staying at the barracks but at times I was sleeping in the township.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="307">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="308">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="309">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="310">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	And you will recall Mr Chairman, that one, evidence has been placed before the Committee that he was on suspension at the time, from the 3rd of January 1989.  He was in Bloemfontein admitted to hospital from the 5th to the 7th of January 1989 and he committed the murder on the 3rd of February 1989, so Mr Chairman, if the question is going to be on the basis of a statement that he lived in the barracks in Pretoria in 1989, we would have an interest in that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="311">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="312">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="313">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Now, will the witness answer the question Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="314">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What the counsel asked is, are you putting that Ngo lived there for the whole of 1989?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="315">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="316">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="317">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>It is an unfortunate misunderstanding but the fact of the matter is that prior to his arrest, he was permanently resident at the barracks in Mamelodi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="318">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Now, could you - you know when your client has been arrested, could you put it to the witness: &quot;up to this day in February or March or April or whenever, he permanently lived at the barracks&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="319">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>As the Chair pleases.  Now during 1987 up to 1989, Ngo  - early 1989, Ngo lived at the barracks.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="320">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="321">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>You see, earlier on you told us that you lived with Ngo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="322">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>I said so, yes, then I said February 1987 he approached me that he wants to work at the security branch but from there I cannot remember well and I cannot dispute that he was staying at the barracks.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="323">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>By the way, when you met - when Mr Ngo approached you for the very, very, very, first time, did you know him before?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="324">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>I used to see him before but ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="325">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>Had you spoken to each other before?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="326">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>Not at all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="327">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="328">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="329">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I said that I saw him then, then the following day I made an appointment with Colonel Loots, then I returned, then I took him to Colonel Loots - that is so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="330">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And this was during February 1997 - rather 1987?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="331">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>That is February 1987.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="332">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And you told us that your application took three months to process from the time you had applied to join the security branch?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="333">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>I told you that it is so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="334">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And according to the record, Mr Ngo left reaction unit in May 1987?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="335">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="336">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="337">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Chairman ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="338">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="339">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="340">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Now, that would have - that is exactly three months from the time when you spoke to Ngo up to the time when he says that he joined security branch.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="341">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>You said he left security - he left the unit in 1987, according to the records?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="342">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>In May, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="343">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>Where did you go according to the records?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="344">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="345">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman in all fairness, my learned friend should put to the witness that on 18 May 1987, according to the record, he went to the college Hammanskraal Human Resources Management - according to this record on 18 May 1987.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="346">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="347">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Now, do you see the coincidence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="348">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>What in what?  What is coinciding with what?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="349">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>That it took three months to process your application to join security branch and that it took ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="350">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>I, I ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="351">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="352">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="353">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>I see it here, it says 1985 on May, Human Resources Management, Hammanskraal College.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="354">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And you say that you do not know where Ngo would have been at the time - you do not know when Ngo left barracks as he did?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="355">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="356">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="357">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="358">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And that he did not go to the college but instead he</text>
		</line>
		<line number="359">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>went to join security branch?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="360">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="361">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Gentlemen, I asked last week whether enquiries could be made to ascertain the accuracy of various records and whether, with all the voluminous records that police normally keep, such as pocket books which they fill in and which are kept thereafter, whether something could not be done to ascertain what records there were as to where the applicant was for this period and I wonder whether enquiries have been made at Hammanskraal for example, to ascertain whether there was such a course that started in May 1987 and matters of the nature because it seems to me an awful lot of time is being spent, which may prove to be entirely valueless if there are accurate records showing where in fact the applicant was at the relevant time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="362">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="363">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>and what he says.  Furthermore, Captain Bokaba arrived at Pretoria a bit late on Friday to be able to get hold of the records.  Colonel Loots and I arrived in Pretoria around about - just after 4 - we were also not able to obtain insight of the records.  Colonel Loots is however today busy trying to find as much information as possible for the Committee and hopefully we will be able to present you with all the evidence that we could succeed in obtaining during this week.  We will do that later in the week Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="364">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I would also like to suggest that the TRC investigators be asked to do what they can because it may well be that they find it easier to be given now official access to records and copies of records than persons who are involved in possible transgressions.  And I would urgently request that, that be done because on the applicants version, this is obviously a falsification of his record and if that is so, it may be that people are reluctant to come forward now.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="365">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes Mr Chairman, that would obviously be of help.  We will do whatever we can to assist the Committee and my attorney and I will probably be back around about Thursday or Friday to present you with whatever information we can get.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="366">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="367">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>whole:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="368" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;You say that you deny that you and Constable Selahla were involved in a petrol-bombing in the Mamelodi district where the applicant was present.  The applicant was never a member of the security branch, Northern Transvaal and as such was never a trusted member of the operations of the security police, Northern Transvaal branch at the time&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="369">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="370">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>If you look at paragraph 6.6, it may perhaps clarify your thoughts.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="371">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="372">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="373">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>I never worked with Ngo in the rest of my life.  Let me just answer it bluntly as such, I never worked with Ngo in my life and Ngo was never a member of the security branch of the Northern Transvaal.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="374">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Now Mr Bokaba, are you suggesting that Ngo would have gone out on a frolic of his own to go and bomb houses belonging to activists in Mamelodi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="375">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="376">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="377">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="378">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>those houses.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="379">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Now, which houses did he say that he burnt together with you and later said it was with his friends?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="380">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="381">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="382">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="383">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>The next answer was then that</text>
		</line>
		<line number="384" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I say so because initially he said that he burnt the houses with us and later on he said he burnt the houses with his friends&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="385">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="386">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Now, this is what I want you to clarify, where do you take that from?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="387">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>That is the evidence he gave before this Commission,</text>
		</line>
		<line number="388">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>even my counsel asked him: </text>
		</line>
		<line number="389" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;why you withdrew or you changed your statement&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="390">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Now, you are referring to words he said at page 13?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="391">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>Which bundle Sir?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="392">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="393">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>I have it before me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="394">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And he then - when he was told by the TRC to give more details as to the state - as to these statements, mentioned that you were not involved in the burning of the house of Rebecca.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="395">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="396">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="397">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="398">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>The point that I wish to make to him is that when he was given the opportunity to explain his statements, he then explained the statement and he exculpates you from the bombing of the house of Sandra Mathabathe.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="399">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="400">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>with that but then what is the point beyond that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="401">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>The point is that the applicant did not set out forcibly to implicate him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="402">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="403">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>You deny involvement in ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="404">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>I deny involvement in any way.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="405">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="406">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="407">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="408">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>I think Mr Ngo said, consider that he did make a mistake.  I know he took a lot of trouble before he made such a concession but he did eventually concede that he made a mistake here.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="409">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="410">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>How much more of an admission do you want Mr du Plessis?  I mean, if the witness himself, under oath admitted that, well I made that mistake ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="411">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="412">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Now what is your comment to the fact that as soon as the opportunity arose for Mr Ngo to ...[inaudible] yourself, he did so and he did say that you were not involved in the burning of the house of Sandra?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="413">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="414">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="415">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="416">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="417">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="418">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Mr Memani, on page 43 of Bundle A, your client states</text>
		</line>
		<line number="419" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;during 1987 to 1988, while I was based at Mamelodi police station as a member of reaction unit 19, working together with members of the security branch&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="420">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="421" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;as a member of reaction unit 19, working together with members of the security branch&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="422">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Perhaps you could think it over during the adjournment and then advise us as to your view on this.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="423">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="424">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="425">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="426">
			<speaker>HENDRIK BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>(s.u.o.)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="427">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="428">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>I know him Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="429">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="430">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>I know Chris Ribero Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="431">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="432">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>I never investigated his case.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="433">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="434">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="435">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Who monitored Chris Ribero?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="436">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, what is the relevance of this, with respect?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="437">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="438">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I hope it is.  You will remember that you told us last week that you would be 30 minutes to an hour this morning.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="439">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>As the Chair pleases.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="440">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="441">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="442">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="443">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="444">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Solit Silwane was your informer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="445">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="446">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Solit Silwane is the person you got information about Chris Ribero from.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="447">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="448">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And Solit Silwane was an informer you saw jointly with Ngo and Selahla.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="449">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="450">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>My instructions are that evidence is forthcoming, attempts are being made to locate people who might corroborate this.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="451">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="452">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="453">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="454">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And my instructions further that you, Ngo and Selahla often raided people together.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="455">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, may I just make sure.  My learned friend says there will be evidence ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="456">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="457">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he said, his instructions are, Mr Chairman.  Then I want to make the point that, that was never testified but I will leave it in your hands to allow the question or not.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="458">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Now, what is your answer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="459">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>I never worked with Ngo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="460">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="461">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Sir, it is not my strategy to trick witnesses, what I do is to put the version that I hope will be established or lay a basis for argument.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="462">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="463">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I understand English although it is not my mother tongue, I understand it like any other person whose English is not his mother tongue.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="464">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="465">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And you also understand Afrikaans?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="466">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="467">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>You are satisfied that the interpreters are interpreting your evidence correctly?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="468">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="469">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And at any stage when you have problems with the interpretation, you have the right to inform the Committee that the interpretation is not correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="470">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="471">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>No, I can hear both, he can also hear both.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="472">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	   Now Mr Bokaba, you say at paragraph 6.2:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="473" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;the applicant contacted me with the request that he wanted to join the security force police at the time, well knowing that I was the contact person if he was at all interested&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="474">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="475">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>That is true because he had an interest and then he came to me, knowing that I was the only member of the security branch who was staying at the barracks and because he had the interest to join the security branch, he came to me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="476">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And on his version, he did not apply but he was just called up so to speak and he was made to work with security branch.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="477">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>According to him?  What I said is that he came to me at the barracks, he contacted me and then he told me that he had an interest to join the security branch.  What he said to you, he told you that but I know that he contacted me at the barracks.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="478">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="479">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="480">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>These people had a system that assisted him in joining the police force despite the fact of his previous convictions, they had worked with him, they had even provided him with a gun before he was trained in the use of firearms.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="481">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="482">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>They were White, had more influence that yourself and they had much higher ranks than you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="483">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="484">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Those were his contacts in the security branch.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="485">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="486">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>You know by the same token, what you say at 6.3 that</text>
		</line>
		<line number="487" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;at that time the applicant informed you that before he joined the police, he had been an informer of the security branch, Bloemfontein and I thought that it was correct that he should be granted the opportunity to maybe join the security police at that time&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="488">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>is also a lie.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="489">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="490">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Now, he told - I think it is - okay.  At paragraph 6.4 you say that</text>
		</line>
		<line number="491" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I contacted my direct commander, Colonel Flip Loots who granted the applicant an interview in respect of his willingness and participation in the security police&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="492">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Now, you heard evidence here that your direct commander would have been Hechter but that you sometimes reported to Flip Loots.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="493">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>Which way did I explain?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="494">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="495">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="496">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, but then the team leader would be your direct commander and then Loots as you say, was the section commander.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="497">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="498">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Well, if Loots - let me put it like this, what type of person would you have referred to as a direct commander and how would you distinguish your team leader from your direct commander?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="499">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>I would say my team leader is my commander in the</text>
		</line>
		<line number="500">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>field.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="501">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And that is the person who gives you commands directly?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="502">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="503">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="504">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>You say if Hechter and Loots were present, what happened?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="505">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>If Hechter and Loots are both present and none of them is on leave, you take your commands directly from Hechter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="506">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="507">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="508">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="509">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="510">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="511">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="512">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>What difficulty have you got with conceding that the person you would ordinarily take commands from, was Hechter?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="513">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="514">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="515">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="516">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But not on the version that Mr Ngo has given?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="517">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.   Now, what difficulty have you got in conceding that from the nature of the command structure, the person you would take commands directly from usually, on you version would have been Hechter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="518">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="519">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Look, what in essence I want to suggest to you is that you in fact refer to Flip Loots as your direct commander because that is how in fact you operated.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="520">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="521">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And on the version that you have given there seems to be no suggestion at all that Hechter would have been active with you and Selahla.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="522">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="523">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="524">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>regard to his version, there is no more than what was said by Loots that Hechter was the commander, the commander was in fact Loots and that is - that corroborates Ngo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="525">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Ngo never knew Hechter, did he?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="526">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he did not know Ngo - he did not know Hechter because Hechter ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="527">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="528">
			<speaker>INTERPRETER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="529">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="530">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="531">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="532">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible] this information for us.  Will you continue?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="533">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>As the Chair pleases.  I understood it to be the evidence of Loots.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="534">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="535">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="536">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>You see, but you referred to him - you referred to him not as a section commander there but as a direct commander.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="537">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="538">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And you did not at 6.4, suggest that Hechter would have been on leave at the time and hence you had to speak to Loots?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="539">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, there is no ...[inaudible] I explained that he was</text>
		</line>
		<line number="540">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="541">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And if Ngo had come to know about your activities - about the security branch merely from being a member of reaction unit, one would have expected him to ...[inaudible] and think that Hechter was the person who was your direct commander?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="542">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="543">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="544">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="545">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="546">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="547">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>know that Loots was lurking in the background.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="548">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>I explained that he could have known Flip Loots because I took him to Flip Loots for an interview because he had an interest to join the security branch,  that is why he did not know Hechter that he was a team leader of Mamelodi.  I hope that if he worked with us at any stage - even my application for amnesty, he could have made the similar applications.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="549">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>I put it to you that you were involved in the activities in which Mr Ngo has implicated you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="550">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="551">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>You see, you did not apply for these things because you did not know that something was simmering at Grootvlei, you had forgotten about Ngo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="552">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>I never worked with Ngo.  What he did, he did those</text>
		</line>
		<line number="553">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>by himself in my absence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="554">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>You, Selahla and - you, Selahla and Loots conspired to apply for amnesty in respect of prominent events or events involving prominent people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="555">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="556">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="557">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="558">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="559">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="560">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="561">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>As the Chair pleases.  Now, Mr ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="562">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, the question as I remember it ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="563">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>He was asked if he had heard of places being burnt and he then said he had heard of the church being burnt from Colonel Loots.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="564">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>As the Chair pleases.   Now, besides yourself and Selahla, who were the other Black policemen who were involved in the security branch?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="565">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Where, please?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="566">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>In Pretoria, in the Pretoria area.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="567">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>People who were members?  Do you mean people who were members of the security branch in Pretoria?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="568">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="569">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="570">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Black people?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="571">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Black people, I did mention them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="572">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Now, will you enumerate the other Black people who were involved in security branch in the Pretoria area?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="573">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="574">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>Should I repeat again?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="575">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="576">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="577">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And there was not bad blood between yourself and Ngo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="578">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="579">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And today, if you admitted that you were involved in these activities, you would be in trouble with the law?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="580">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="581">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="582">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="583">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="584">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="585">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>I do not know those people myself.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="586">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="587">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>conviction and sentenced for a long period.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="588">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="589">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Except that we know that the security branch was influential at the time and often they got away with most heinous crimes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="590">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="591">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="592">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="593">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="594">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="595">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>How long would you require?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="596">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="597">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Go and do it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="598">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="599">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Anyone else who desires to put any questions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="600">
			<speaker>MR BRINK</speaker>
			<text>No thanks.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="601">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>I have no questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="602">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR DU PLESSIS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="603">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>I have no questions thank you, Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="604">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR STANDER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="605">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Visser on record.  Mr Chairman, we have no questions, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="606">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR VISSER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="607">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>After Mr Ngo approached you as you say he did, that he was interested in joining the security branch, you felt that you should take him to Loots?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="608">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>That is so.  I explained to him that I will arrange for</text>
		</line>
		<line number="609">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>an appointment with Colonel Loots.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="610">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>Did you have personal about him yourself as to his suitability or otherwise?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="611">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="612">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="613">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="614">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="615">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>He said ...[inaudible]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="616">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="617">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>So, with regard to involvement in the security police in Bloemfontein, all he told you or all that you knew before you went to see Captain Loots was that Mr Ngo had been an informer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="618">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="619">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>How many people stayed at the barracks at Mamelodi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="620">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>The barracks at Mamelodi was a double-storey building.  There were a lot of divisions, murder and robbery squad, liquor squads - those who came from outside Mamelodi stayed there.  I can say more than 500 approximately 500, we were quite a lot.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="621">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="622">
			<speaker>MR BOKABA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="623">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="624">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
		<line number="625">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="626">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Very well Mr du Plessis, you and your attorney are excused for the moment.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="627">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairman</text>
		</line>
		<line number="628">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR DU PLESSIS AND ATTORNEY EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>