<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY HEARINGS</type>
	<startdate>1998-01-27</startdate>
	<location>BLOEMFONTEIN</location>
		<names>MR MAMOME</names>
							<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=54631&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/bloem/bloem5_2ndngo7.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="1409">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>ON RESUMPTION 27 JANUARY 1998</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, if I may be allowed to say something while Mr Mamome is on his way back to the witness stand.  We have managed to locate the docket in the matter in which Mr White Mohapi laid a charge of assault and attempted murder and robbery with the South African Police.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Visser, I&#039;m getting a bit concerned that the matter seems to be getting out of hand now.  Precisely what are the contents of the docket going to show?  Are we going to come across certain statements which would have been allegedly been made by Mr Mohpi which he would then say: &quot;I didn&#039;t say that, the people who took those statements might have been collaborting with the security branch, I never said that&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	And are we then thereafter going to have to call those people who would supposedly have taken statements from him, to come and say: &quot;Well, this is what he said&quot; and so on and so forth.  I&#039;m getting worried that this matter is - we&#039;ll have to consider it very carefully Mr Visser.  We appreciate that you raise that point, you came across the docket.  	</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	But I think for a start, you should discuss the matter - and this is my personal opinion, discuss the matter with Mr Stander with regard in particular to some of the issues that I have raised.  If we are going to end up opening a totally new front altogether, I would have serious misgivings about that.  It seems to us that we must restrict ourselves, certainly within the perimeter of what we are here for.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	And I think that, speaking for myself, you will need to discuss with Mr Stander, to make sure that we are not going to open a totally new front and in the end finding ourselves embarking on virtually a trial within a trial.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	As I understand it has been available to the  Police throughout.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>No Mr Chairman, we -  Colonel Erasmus only found this this docket over the weekend and we had a look at it on ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman what do we do with this docket now?  Are you not prepared to see it can we not</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> CHAIRPERSON:  I suggest you give it to Mr Stander  and see if he has any views to express because it&#039;s his client. </text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mamome, is it correct that Mr Motsamai calls you Mzito?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Your mike is off.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>No, Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Are you not aware that he was nicknamed &quot;Crossroads&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker>MR. MAMOME:</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>My instructions are that you used to call him &quot;Crossroads&quot; because he used he used to go with you petrol bombing houses and you said that he reminded you of Crossroads in in in the Cape Province which was in flames at the time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>Its not like that Chairperson</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker>MR. MEMANE</speaker>
			<text>It seems someone is playing his radio on the earphones.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>[PROBLEM WITH EARPHONES]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>I put it to you that you deny knowing the nickname &quot;Crossroads&quot; because it will show that you were aware of the fact that Motsamai was involved in petrol bombings.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Is it also not true that you and Motsamai were in the same karate club?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>I start to hear to-day Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Do you know a karate club called Fatima?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>I know that Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Were you not in that karate club?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>I put it to you again that you&#039;re making this denial only to dissociate yourself from Mr Motsamai.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>I have no reason to disassociate myself from Mr Motsamai, he was working where I was working.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Is it also not correct that you were working with Mr Motsamai when Mr Mzuzwana was shot at?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>No Sir, its not like that Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Colonel Smith?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Colonel Smith, yes Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I start to hear these things to-day.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Do you remember that at any stage you ever worked with Mr Motsamai, visiting informers locally?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>No Chairperson, I do not remember.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Do you recall that you ever worked with with Mr Motsamai at any stage?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>Motsamai was working in the same section which I worked, he was not my partner.  As I said we worked in two&#039;s and that is one black one white.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Do you recall that you ever performed any task with Motsamai?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>If maybe you able to identify that operation or that work maybe I may remember.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>As you are sitting there, you yourself do not recall any task that you ever performed with Motsamai?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>No, Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson its not like that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="61">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="62">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>I was not present Chairperson, I was not present Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="63">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>I have instructions from Jeff Mabilo that he was present when you gave a certain firearm to &quot;Yster&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="64">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="65">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Do you know Jeff Mabilo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="66">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="67">
			<speaker>MR. MAMANE:</speaker>
			<text>Helped his sister when she was raped, is that what you said?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="68">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>That is correct</text>
		</line>
		<line number="69">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And do you know Yster?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="70">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>I know Yster he was my friend.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="71">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>As far as you are aware are there any ill feelings between yourself and Jeff Mabilo</text>
		</line>
		<line number="72">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>No Sir, not at all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="73">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="74">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="75">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="76">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="77">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>I regarded him as my younger brother we, did not a conflict or an ill feeling.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="78">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="79">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>Kabusa was my colleague not a friend.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="80">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And Nicos was your friend?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="81">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, that is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="82">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="83">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="84">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="85">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="86">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="87">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="88">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="89">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, when we asked this boy he agreed that he killed that little girl.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="90">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>How old was this little boy?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="91">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>14 years Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="92">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>I want us to deal with Oupa Makubalo.  My instructions are that you are the person who came into the - just one second, my instructions are that you are the person who came into the kitchen and said that your informer had told you that he had seen Oupa.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="93">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>You saying he saw Oupa?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="94">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, Makubalo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="95">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, it seems to the question is incomplete, I request Mr Memani to put it again.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="96">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What he said was you were the person who came into the kitchen and said that your informer had seen Oupa.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="97">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="98">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="99">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, that was denied.  I do not recall if I specifically put that it was Mamome but if if I did not put put it to the other witnesses it was due to oversight.  My recollection would be that even in his evidence Motsamai said Mamome came and made the report.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="100">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="101">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="102">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Now my instructions are that you are the person who came and made the report that your informer had seen Mr Makubalo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="103">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>I dispute that Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="104">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And my instructions again are that the informer who was killed by Makubalo was was in fact your informer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="105">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="106">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	It is surprising, we speak of human life a human life.  Maybe the truth would not come out but the person who has killed and the person who handled that person would surface.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="107">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Now, when you arrived at the place where Makubalo was, we are told that you shot, you  first without speaking to Makubalo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="108">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>It is not like that Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="109">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="110">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="111">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Did you at any stage say that Motsamai must stop shooting?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="112">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>No, Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="113">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And Makubalo told us that he heard gun fire until the time when he decided that come what may, he was no longer going to run away and you came and tripped him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="114">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="115">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Now, as you were running, were you the one who was at the forefront?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="116">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>I came with a car then I stopped it just in front of him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="117">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And you started pursuing Makubalo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="118">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>No, I caught him Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="119">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="120">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>Oupa was standing next to - at a house, then he saw Mr Motsamai, then he ran around then Mr Motsamai started shooting then he jumped a fence to the next street, then I came with another street, then we met somewhere on that street.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="121">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Did you not pursue him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="122">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="123">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Then why did it take you so long to concede that you pursued him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="124">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="125">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But a moment ago you when you were asked you specifically said: &quot;I did not pursue him, I caught him&quot;, now you say you pursued him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="126">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I pursued him with a car.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="127">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, did the others run after him and you drove round to another road in a car?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="128">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="129">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="130">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="131">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>You see, because Mr Makubalo told us that the person who caught him approached him from behind and tripped him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="132">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="133">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Or let me say that the impression that I got is that the person who caught him approached him from behind.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="134">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="135">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>It may not have been correctly interpreted to you.  I said that he decided come what may he was not going to run away anymore and the person then came and caught him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="136">
			<speaker>COMMISSIONER:</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="137">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="138">
			<speaker>INTERPRETER</speaker>
			<text>Interpreters are disturbed by a Radio Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="139">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>[RADIO DISTURBANCES]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="140">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="141">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Now Mr Mamome, we were told that the car was parked at the spot where it stopped when Makubalo was first seen.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="142">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="143">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Well, let me say near the -  next to the vehicle.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="144">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="145">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>I think it was Mmelesi who said he did not join in the chase, he stood next to the car while the rest of you chased Oupa.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="146">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>I pursued Oupa with a car, I was not pursuing him on foot.  When I arrived next to Oupa I stopped the Kombi then I said to him: &quot;Stop&quot;, then I did not run after him but I pursued him with a car.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="147">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="148">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="149">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="150">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="151">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Of all the people who testified about this incident, you are the only person who has suggested that the vehicle was used to chase Makubalo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="152">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="153">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And I also put it to you that you are the only person whom Makubalo could recall clearly as having been present on the day.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="154">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="155">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="156">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="157">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="158">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="159">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>So I think its common cause at least that he was on the scene and that he did the arrest.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="160">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="161">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="162">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>I said yesterday, I even say to-day that I was not carrying a gun, I arrested Mr Makubalo.  It was not necessary to trip him and to kick him, I just arrested him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="163">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And I also put it to you that you deny having pursued Mr Makubalo on foot because amongst other things you fired shots at him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="164">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>It is not like that Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="165">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And that for the same reason you deny that you carried a gun at all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="166">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>I did not carry a gun.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="167">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>One of the witnesses said all of you were armed, had guns. Would he be mistaken?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="168">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>I think he is mistaken.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="169">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="170">
			<speaker>Mr MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="171">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And is it also not correct that you were present on various occasions when he committed certain offences?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="172">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="173">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Is it not correct that you sometimes worked with him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="174">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>I did not work with Mr Ngo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="175">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="176">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="177">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>No, let me be precise I was referring to the time when Mr Ngo was injured.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="178">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="179">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>It surprises me that Mr Ngo would come and lie about that fact because it does not involve any offence or implicate you in any wrongdoing.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="180">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>I want to reply to Mr Memani&#039;s question Chairperson.  He is sentenced for twenty five years, he has stayed for seven years and therefore he has created a story which he should bring to the Truth Commission.  I do not know Mr Venter Mr Memani.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="181">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="182">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="183">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And my instructions are that you used to come there to see him after he was injured and on occasions Mr Venter was there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="184">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Venter was visiting him in hospital?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="185">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="186">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Oh.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="187">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>It is not like that Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="188">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And I put it to you that you deny knowing Mr Venter at all because of the knowledge that you did assist Mr Ngo when he killed Mr Venter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="189">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="190">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>No further questions Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="191">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR MEMANI</text>
		</line>
		<line number="192">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Brink?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="193">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR BRINK</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairman I&#039;ll be brief.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="194">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Memani, on the 6th of April 198 ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="195">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>This is Mr Mamome Mr Brink.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="196">
			<speaker>MR BRINK</speaker>
			<text>I beg your pardon.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="197">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	On the 6th of April 1986, when this group of 19 were brought to the fountain security branch headquarters, did you interrogate any of the females?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="198">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>No Sir, I did not interrogate women.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="199">
			<speaker>MR BRINK</speaker>
			<text>Well perhaps you can help me, there has been evidence that when the female members of that group of 19 were interrogated no policewomen were present.  Do you know of any police regulations which provide for the necessity of policewomen being present when female detainees were being questioned?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="200">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="201">
			<speaker>MR BRINK</speaker>
			<text>No, my question is, are you aware of any police regulations which provide that in the event of female detainees being questioned a policewoman must be present, that is my question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="202">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="203">
			<speaker>MR BRINK</speaker>
			<text>Were any of these females searched to your knowledge?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="204">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>Any person who has been taken to the cells should be searched.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="205">
			<speaker>MR BRINK</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="206">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR BRINK</text>
		</line>
		<line number="207">
			<speaker>RE-EXAMINTION BY MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="208">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="209">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="210">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson</text>
		</line>
		<line number="211">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>As you were travelling, was he standing on your left or on the right hand side of the road?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="212">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>He was on the right side Si,r of the road.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="213">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>You then stopped?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="214">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Si.r</text>
		</line>
		<line number="215">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Did you know Oupa Makubalo yourself at that time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="216">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson, I knew him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="217">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And you stopped because you identified him as Oupa Makubalo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="218">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>That is correct .</text>
		</line>
		<line number="219">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Now was this near a corner or was it in the middle of a block of of of of houses?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="220">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>It was on the third house before you are - before the corner but it was just near the corner</text>
		</line>
		<line number="221">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="222">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="223">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="224">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thereafter he was shot at and he then ran away.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="225">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="226">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Now in which direction did he run, did he run up or down the street in which you your car was travelling or how did he run away?  Where did he go?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="227">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>He jumped a fence to the next street.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="228">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Is that the street running parallel to the one in which you were you were driving the the Kombi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="229">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="230">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>What did you then do?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="231">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>I went forward, I took the direction where the Kombi was pointing, straight.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="232">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Did you drive the Kombi forward?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="233">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="234">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Did you come to the corner?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="235">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="236">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>What What happened then did you carry on did you stop did you ...[End of tape 1A - no follow-on sound]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="237">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>I turned right.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="238">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>To the next corner or before that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="239">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>When I arrived at the next corner then Oupa came and then we met at the corner.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="240">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Did you stop the Kombi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="241">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="242">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Did you get out of the Kombi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="243">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>Yes I went out.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="244">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Did you trip Oupa to be able to arrest him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="245">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>No Sir, I just went out of the car and then I went to him I grabbed him then I put him in the car.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="246">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Did you see any of the others who were pursuing him at that stage?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="247">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>They came individually to the Kombi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="248">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Thank you no further questions</text>
		</line>
		<line number="249">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR VISSER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="250">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>Taking a quick glance over the evidence and the things which we have put to you in respect of which you are allegedly implicated,  particularly by Mr Motsamai.  It seems to me that of all the people Mr Motsamai implicates, he implicates you the most in terms of the sheer number of incidents.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="251">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I have seen no less than 15, 16 such incidents and I wonder why Mr Motsamai would do this taking into account that you are in good terms.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="252">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="253">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>And also in terms of the incidents of petrol bombing he implicates you the most in terms of the sheer number of incidents, it puzzles you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="254">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>That is worse Chairperson, it surprises me more.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="255">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="256">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="257">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>It seems to me that all of these incidents were matters that would have been - were matters that certainly would have come to the notice of the police and probably have been investigated by them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="258">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="259">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did you make any effort to check the time and date of each of these incidents just to make sure that it was not a time when you were away?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="260">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="261">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And had they?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="262">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>I went on my own but I did not find them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="263">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="264">
			<speaker>MR MAMOME</speaker>
			<text>I searched for dockets for all these incidents.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="265">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="266">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Mr Tsoametsi is here Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="267">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>You still under oath Sir,</text>
		</line>
		<line number="268">
			<speaker>MR TSOAMETSI</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="269">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Now Mr Tsoametsi, yesterday you were referred to the application of Mr Ngo and there the names of the people he enumerated as having participated in the abduction of or kidnap of Mr Mohapi was read out to you, do you remember that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="270">
			<speaker>MR TSOAMETSI</speaker>
			<text>I remember Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="271">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Now I want to put to you what he in fact said in his evidence whilst he was testifying in chief.   At page 30 A2 Mr Ngo said when asked</text>
		</line>
		<line number="272" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Were you alone when you kidnapped Mr Mohapi&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="273">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="274">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="275">
			<speaker>MR TSOAMETSI</speaker>
			<text>I heard him when he said that .</text>
		</line>
		<line number="276">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And again it was put to you that Mr Tsoametsi or rather Mr Ngo referred to Hilton Police station.  Now I want to read to you what Mr Ngo said in chief at page 32 of A2.  He said</text>
		</line>
		<line number="277" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I mean the police were arresting for public violence, that is Coetzee and them.  When he was supposed to be released we got that information then they said that we should come after we have knocked off, that we should come and kidnap him.  So they phoned the Hilton Police station where he was detained, either Hilton Police station or Bayswater police station&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="278">
			<speaker>MR TSOAMETSI</speaker>
			<text>I did not know of that, Ngo is lying</text>
		</line>
		<line number="279">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And that he was detained at Bayswater police station coincides with where Mr Mohapi said he was detained.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="280">
			<speaker>MR TSOAMETSI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="281">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="282">
			<speaker>MR TSOAMETSI</speaker>
			<text>Sir, everything that is said by Ngo is a lie, he knows where I was working.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="283">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Have you ever interrogated a white person?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="284">
			<speaker>MR TSOAMETSI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, outside.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="285">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Outside what?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="286">
			<speaker>MR TSOAMETSI</speaker>
			<text>The first one was at Koffiefontein where I was working, it was in the South Free State  and at Gariepdam.  Even if even when the white person was there and I did not understand I would chip in and say: &quot;Repeat yourself, I want to understand&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="287">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="288">
			<speaker>MR TSOAMETSI</speaker>
			<text>Ngo would not know because he was not in that section, as much as I did not know what they did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="289">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>But it is implicit in your answer when you say:  yes, that you did interview people outside, that you did not interview people at Fountains, white people at fountains.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="290">
			<speaker>MR TSOAMETSI</speaker>
			<text>Sir, if it was necessary, because I work with a white person, if the white person is interrogating and I do not understand something and I really want to understand better I would ask him because the next day we&#039;re going to meet with a white person and say he said this and he said that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="291">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="292">
			<speaker>MR TSOAMETSI</speaker>
			<text>When I am sitting with the white person this white person is interrogating another white person, he will carry on with the interrogation and this white person will provide answers.  Now if there is something in his answers that I do not understand I will stop and say: &quot;I do not understand that point&quot;, then it will be explained until I understand it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="293">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Now should I accept it now that you yourself have never taken a lead role in an interrogating a white person?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="294">
			<speaker>MR TSOAMETSI</speaker>
			<text>Take it that way Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="295">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Now to which organisation did the white person interrogated belong?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="296">
			<speaker>MR TSOAMETSI</speaker>
			<text>When we were at Koffiefontein this white man was working at the mines and there was  violence, he was mishandling black people.  Now it seemed as if violence was going to begin.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="297">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>In what fashion did he mishandle black people?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="298">
			<speaker>MR TSOAMETSI</speaker>
			<text>He was not talking to them properly he did not listen to their grieviances, work related grievances.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="299">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Now I asked you, did he belong to any political organisation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="300">
			<speaker>MR TSOAMETSI</speaker>
			<text>I do not remember.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="301">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Did you - the other white person you told us about two white persons, did he belong to any political organisation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="302">
			<speaker>MR TSOAMETSI</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="303">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER:</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible] security police at that stage at Koffiefontein and Gariepdam?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="304">
			<speaker>MR TSOAMETSI</speaker>
			<text>Those areas were falling under Bloemfontein.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="305">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>What did your job entail exactly in this white section?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="306">
			<speaker>MR TSOAMETSI</speaker>
			<text>It was the security duty.  When we have gone out I was supposed to be in a position to help where my white colleagues would not understand some of the things that were mentioned by the black people, now I had to explain the situation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="307">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Now what did the white section do?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="308">
			<speaker>MR TSOAMETSI</speaker>
			<text>The white section was was keeping an eye on areas where violence might erupt where conflicts existed because of race.  Those were the things we started to - we wanted to stop before they can start.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="309">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="310">
			<speaker>MR TSOAMETSI</speaker>
			<text>I do not know Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="311">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Now I put it to you that you only say that you worked in the white section because you wanted to dissociate yourself from Ngo and that becomes clear by your inability to tell us what you actually did in the white section.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="312">
			<speaker>MR TSOAMETSI</speaker>
			<text>Sir, that is not true, Ngo knows very well.  The position he is in now is difficult, everyone would go a long way to rescue himself.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="313">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="314">
			<speaker>MR TSOAMETSI</speaker>
			<text>It is true there has never been a conflict between the two of us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="315">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="316">
			<speaker>MR TSOAMETSI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="317">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Is it also not true that thereafter you visited him to see how he was doing?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="318">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>In the hospital or at Venter&#039;s house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="319">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="320">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I just want to point out Mr Chairman, that no such evidence was ever given by Mr Ngo, either in regard to Mr Mamome or in regard to this witness.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="321">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="322">
			<speaker>MR TSOAMETSI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="323">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="324">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="325">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="326">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>They were together Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="327">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="328">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="329">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>I take this as something which arises after a witness has testified which you can put to a witness.  I did not at any stage suggest that it was the evidence of Mr Ngo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="330">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="331">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>As the Chair pleases.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="332">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="333">
			<speaker>MR TSOAMETSI</speaker>
			<text>No, I have never been there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="334">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Those are my questions Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="335">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR MEMANI</text>
		</line>
		<line number="336">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Brink have you already questioned this witness?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="337">
			<speaker>MR BRINK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="338">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR BRINK</text>
		</line>
		<line number="339">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Re-examination?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="340">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>None thank you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="341">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO RE-EXAMINATION BY MR VISSER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="342">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="343">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
		<line number="344">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I call Lieutenant Shaw.  I&#039;m not</text>
		</line>
		<line number="345">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="346">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I may mention that there are two affidavits of Lieutenant Shaw in Exhibit B or bundle B rather.  The first is at page 38 and the second is at page 92. </text>
		</line>
		<line number="347">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="348">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Mr Shaw, were you attached to the South African Police?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="349">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="350">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And are you at present still in the South African Police Service or what is your position?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="351">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>I have left the police, I accepted a separation package and I am running my own business to-day.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="352">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And with which rank did you retire from the police?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="353">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>Superintendent.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="354">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>You became aware of the fact that certain allegations regarding illegal acts were made against you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="355">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="356">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Did you together with others go to Pretoria?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="357">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="358">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>When you heard for the first time regarding allegations from the side of Ngo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="359">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="360">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>At that stage Motsamai also accompanied this group to Pretoria.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="361">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="362">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>But you met them there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="363">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="364">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I wish to ask you as far as your knowledge goes, was there any influence exerted by any person to say anything in an affidavit or to sign an affidavit which had previously been prepared by somebody else?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="365">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>No, there was no influence exerted on me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="366">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>You yourself made an affidavit dated 18 March 1997?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="367">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="368">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Is that sworn affidavit now in front of you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="369">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="370">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Do you affirm the correctness and the truth of the content thereof?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="371">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="372">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Is it also true that you later became aware of an application by Motsamai and of the fact that you were also mentioned in that application, that you were implicated there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="373">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="374">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Do you have that affidavit in front of you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="375">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>Is that the one dated 13/5/97 E33 or P33, it wasn&#039;t quite clear?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="376">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>Yes, indeed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="377">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="378">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="379">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Mr Shaw, when did you join the South African police?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="380">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>27 February 1971.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="381">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And did you also become a member of the security branch in Bloemfontein?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="382">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="383">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>What was your exact task, in which section did you work during the period 1985/&#039;86?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="384">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>I was under the command of Colonel Coetzee, we worked with black affairs in Bloemfontein.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="385">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Now can you please give us a list of the names of the people in the black section during that period?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="386">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="387">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>How many Kochs were there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="388">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>There were two Kochs, Warrant Officer P.A.C. Koch and L.D. Koch.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="389">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="390">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Cronje.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="391">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Erasmus?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="392">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Erasmus.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="393">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And yourself?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="394">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="395">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Can you tell us approximately how many members in total were there in the security branch of Bloemfontein in &#039;85/&#039;86?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="396">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>Between 60 and 70 members.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="397">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>As far as you are implicated by Mr Ngo and Mr Motsamai in the Commission of any misdemeanours or any illegal or unlawful deeds, what is your reaction to that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="398">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>Well, I deny those allegations.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="399">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Let us quickly go through the separate cases or instances mentioned.  Firstly as far as Mr Ngo is concerned, you are aware of the testimony he gave that he had been brought here from Pretoria and that in a meeting where you were present he was instructed to kill Venter, is that true?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="400">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="401">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="402">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>That is untrue.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="403">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>The suggestion was that he had to use an Old Mutual Insurance form and take that to discuss it with Mr Venter and once he had been admitted into the house he had to shoot him with a firearm which you had provided to him at the Hamilton shooting range.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="404">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>I deny the allegations they are untrue.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="405">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Well, that is not necesarily everything that he had said but we know that Venter was murdered, that his house was emptied and all the goods stolen and that there was a later trial.  Did you have anything whatsoever to do with this murder of Mr Venter?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="406">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="407">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Was Mr Venter an activist?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="408">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="409">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>On page 23 of his application, Mr Ngo indicated that Erasmus and you had a problem with White Mohapi in that he every time he was taken to court was let off and you then gave Mr Ngo the instruction to monitor this person White Mohapi and to note all and report all his misdemeanours or movements so that you could succeed in putting him in jail permanently.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="410">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Can you give me the page reference again?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="411">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="412">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The page reference, you gave a page reference.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="413">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="414">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="415">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, 23.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="416">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="417">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="418">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="419">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="420">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>I had nothing to do with the arrangements nor do I have any knowledge of the incident.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="421">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>The testimony is further that you and Erasmus gave instructions that Mr White Mohapi had to be abducted and assaulted, is that true?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="422">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>I deny that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="423">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>On page 28 Mr Ngo said that you were present and participated in the assault and torture of members of the group of 19 people who had been transferred from Ladybrand to Bloemfontein in April &#039;86, is that true?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="424">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>That is untrue.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="425">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Were you present at any time during the interrogation of those persons?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="426">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>I have knowledge of the matter, the persons who were transported from Ladybrand to Bloemfontein and were interrogated by members of the security branch.  My instructions came from Colonel du Plooy who was looking for people to assist them with the interrogation of these people and I made people available for this purpose. 	This now deals with the detention of these people in order to complete the necessary administrative forms.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="427">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>To complete the administrative matters, in other words the processing of these people?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="428">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="429">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Did you yourself participate in any interrogation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="430">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>No, I was not involved in any interrogation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="431">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="432">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>As far as I know there were informants among them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="433">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Were they of your informants?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="434">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="435">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Can you just tell us, can you remember how many of those 19 people were informants at that stage?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="436">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="437">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, when you said: &quot;your informers&quot;, did you mean you personally or the security branch Bloemfontein?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="438">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairman, let me - I think the witness witness must rather answer reply to that.  	Mr Shaw if we refer to the informants and whose they were, if you say: &quot;yes&quot;, did you mean that they were your personal informers or were they informers of whom you were aware had been or were informers of the security branch?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="439">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="440">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>But one of them was your own informer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="441">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="442">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>With the regards to the allegation made by Mr Ngo of the raid and the arrest of 40 to 50 students, scholars at Botshabello in &#039;86, it is alleged that you personally also participated in the assault or torture of these people.  Now the first question I have for you is, did you have anything to do with this incident?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="443">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>I have no knowledge of the incident.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="444">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Were you present during any processing or handling of these persons in Botshabello?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="445">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>I have no knowledge of the matter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="446">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>If we may go over to Mr Motsamai on page 145 of bundle A, he referred to the murder of George Musi.  This is a murder which was committed in Milk Street or Melk Street and he said that Coetzee and you gave him instructions and also to Mamome to murder George Musi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="447">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>I have no knowledge of that matter, I do not know George Musi at all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="448">
			<speaker>Mr VISSER:</speaker>
			<text>And then he also said, this is now Mr Motsamai page 145 that you gave instructions that the house of Mrs Winnie Mandela should be attacked or that you participated in that, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="449">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="450">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And furthermore that you also gave instructions or participated in the attack on a clinic belonging to Mrs Winnie Mandela.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="451">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="452">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I think you have already said it but as far there is any allegation of illegality, what is your reaction?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="453">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>I was not involved in these illegalities at all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="454">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Mr Shaw, if we can just chat for a moment about Mr Nelson Ngo.  When did you become aware of him for the first time and is there something that you can tell us of what you can remember about his relationship with the police?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="455">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>I know that he was an informer of the branch.  I did not deal with him myself, he was dealt with by superintendent Erasmus.  I knew him, he was an informer of the office.  I did not deal with him but superintendent Erasmus did.  I know about the incident where he was attacked at the school.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="456">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Can you recall in what year this took place?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="457">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>I cannot remember precisely.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="458">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Continue please.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="459">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>And that he worked at the security branch as a student for a month or two before he went to the police college.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="460">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And that was in &#039;86?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="461">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="462">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Until he left for the police training college in Pretoria?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="463">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="464">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>After he left Bloemfontein, we know this was in July of &#039;86, did you ever hear from him or see see him again or have anything to do with him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="465">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>I had nothing further to do with him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="466">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Who dealt with him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="467">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>Superintendent Erasmus.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="468">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, I do this with hesitation because it is relevant.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="469">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	But let me just ask you, do you know a person with the name Molefe, S.S. Molefe?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="470">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="471">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>He says that on the 25th of May 1993 you were present while he was assulated. Do you know anthing about this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="472">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>I have no knowledge of this.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="473">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I have no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="474">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR VISSER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="475">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>... [No English translation]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="476">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>... [No English translation]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="477">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>...[No English translation] Was this in an official capacity?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="478">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>No, I knew that he came to the office and that we saw him there but I had no discussion with him or had anything to do with him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="479">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS:</speaker>
			<text>Did he tell you what he was doing in Pretoria?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="480">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="481">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="482">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR DU PLESSIS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="483">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>Mr Shaw, the activities of White Mohapi, were you interested in this in your official capacity?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="484">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="485">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>Is it because you worked very closely with that specific section?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="486">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="487">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>So would you describe it that if he could be eliminated that you would have made an important breakthrough?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="488">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="489">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>Why would you say that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="490">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>Because I did not believe in eliminating people or getting rid of them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="491">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>I do not mean that you wanted him killed or dead but that if he could not be involved in the black townships that it would have been an important breakthrough?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="492">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>I think the word: &quot;eliminate&quot; has a certain meaning in certain circles and you must take this into consideration when you use this word what  meaning you attach to it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="493">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairman, I will try to use another word.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="494">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	In order to neutralise him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="495">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Thank you to my learned friend.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="496">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Would you say that to take him out of the community would have been an important breakthrough?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="497">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>Provision was made in the act for the detention of these persons to according to the act to detain them and in this way to remove them from the community.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="498">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>Did you on occasion make use of this in regard to Mr White Mohapi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="499">
			<speaker>Mr SHAW</speaker>
			<text>Not personally no.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="500">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>Why did you not do this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="501">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>At times we could not get hold of him and at times we were looking for him and we wanted to take action against him in accordance with the Act but he just escaped.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="502">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>Is it true that at one stage you were interested in obtaining his services as an informer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="503">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>I have no knowledge of that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="504">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>Would you regard it as important to obtain a prominent person such as Mr White Mohapi as an informer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="505">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>Could you repeat the question please?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="506">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>Would you regard it as important to obtain a prominent person such as Mr White Mohapi as an informer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="507">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="508">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>Do you know of any attempts which were made in your department in order to obtain his services as an informer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="509">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>Not that I have any knowledge of.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="510">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>Tell me, after or let me put it differently, do you know that in 1984 he was detained at Bayswater police station?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="511">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="512">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>So you can give us no evidence to the contrary, where he tells us that he was detained in terms of security legislation in that during that period?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="513">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>I have no knowledge of that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="514">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, what what period was it when the witness was on a course in Pretoria?  Can he just repeat that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="515">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>If I have my dates correct it was from the first of April &#039;84 up to and including or somewhere in June &#039;84.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="516">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="517">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>Tell me, Mr Molefe he had just returned from prison at Robben Island, were you interested in his activities?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="518">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>I do not know the Molefe you are referring to.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="519">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>I understand that he was a prominent member of the P.A.C. at that stage.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="520">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="521">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>Mr Shaw, I am now going on to the incident where the group of 19 persons were interrogated.  What was your personal involvement in this interrogation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="522">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>I was not involved personally, I was only asked by Colonel du Plooy  to make persons available for the processing of the detention forms of these people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="523">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>Can you just describe shortly what procedure you followed when interrogations were done?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="524">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>Do you mean when I had to interrogate somebody?  One would sit opposite one another and talk to one another and try to gain information .</text>
		</line>
		<line number="525">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>I asked this to the others as well but you must ...[indistinct], I have to do it again.  What do you do if a person does not want to give his co-operation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="526">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>If the person was in detention then he was returned to the cells and then after a day or two we would fetch him again and have discussions with him again.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="527">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>And if he was not being detained?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="528">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>If he was not being detained we would just release him and we would see whether wo would get sufficient information regarding this matter from other sources.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="529">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>And if it was extremely necessary or essential information that you required, what did you do then?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="530">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>I would definitely not go over to violence or torture, we would have tried to convince him by just talking to him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="531">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>And you did nothing else but talk to him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="532">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="533">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="534">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="535">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="536">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="537">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>I hear what you are saying to me.  It is true that one can argue this aspect but as I said to you yesterday I would just like to give the witness the opportunity to give his opinion.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="538">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>He has said he would never have used violence.  We are here, may I remind you Mr Stander, to go into the application of Ngo and Motsamai.  We are not here to conduct an investigation of the security branch or matters of that nature and we do not propose to permit prolonged cross-examination on matters that are not applicable to the applications before us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="539">
			<speaker>MR STANDER:</speaker>
			<text>I hear what you are saying to me.  With great respect, we are dealing with the application of Mr Motsamai where he alleges that assaults did take place in the group of 19.  I am ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="540">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="541">
			<speaker>MR STANDER:</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="542">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Will you please put your questions otherwise your cross-examination will be terminated.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="543">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>As it pleases you Mr Chairman.  I want to put it to you Mr Shaw that the procedure which was followed during the interrogation was not as calm as you are pretending, violence was used.  That is what I want to put to you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="544">
			<speaker>Mr SHAW:</speaker>
			<text>I have no knowledge of any violence that was used on these people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="545">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="546">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="547">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>And if Motsamai says that he assaulted some of them, then according to you he is also lying, do I understand you correctly?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="548">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>That is his version.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="549">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>But do you have any reason to distrust him when he says he did assault some of these people?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="550">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>Well, if he says he did then he did but I have no knowledge of any assaults that took place.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="551">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>He did not only say that he did he also said the other members of the group who were involved in the interrogation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="552">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>I have no knowledge of the assaults.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="553">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="554">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>I said I have no knowledge .</text>
		</line>
		<line number="555">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>I have no further questions, thank you</text>
		</line>
		<line number="556">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR STANDER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="557">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="558">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>Is that the one which is marked P19?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="559">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>That is the one that is the one which deals with Mr Ngo, its dated the 18th of March.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="560">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>It is headed Amnesty Application M.N. Ngo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="561">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="562">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Have you read that affidavit?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="563">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="564">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And you are satisfied that the affidavit was drafted according with your instructions in all material respects?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="565">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="566">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And I wish to refer you now to page 39, paragraph 3.2 where you say that</text>
		</line>
		<line number="567" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Ngo was recruited to work as an in informant for our branch and from time to time I saw - I dealt with him in that capacity&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="568">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="569">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And so you did in fact deal with Ngo and not only Erasmus?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="570">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>Erasmus was the main handler of Mr Ngo and on occasion it was one occasion when I saw him and it was at the request of Mr Erasmus.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="571">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And you further say that</text>
		</line>
		<line number="572" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I have further knowledge that at one stage he was</text>
		</line>
		<line number="573" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>attacked by his co-scholars or fellow scholars&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="574">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="575">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR MEMANI</text>
		</line>
		<line number="576" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;and that he was taken to the hospital or had to be taken to the hospital by members of our branch&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="577">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="578">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="579">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>I have no knowledge of Mr Venter nor do I know where Mr Nelson Ngo found himself after this incident.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="580">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="581">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>I do know that Superintendent Erasmus was concerned about Mr Ngo but I do not know what the arrangements were that he made regarding Mr Ngo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="582">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Do you know that he made arrangements for his safety thereafter?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="583">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>I have no knowledge of that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="584">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR MEMANI</text>
		</line>
		<line number="585" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Thereafter he completed his school career at Ladybrand after which he joined the SAP as a member&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="586">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="587">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="588">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>After he had been sworn in as a member of the police I regarded him as a member of the police, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="589">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Mr Shaw did you have any differences with Mr Ngo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="590">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>No, I had no differences with him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="591">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="592">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="593">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>If I may have a moment Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="594">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="595">
			<speaker>Mr SHAW:</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="596">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>It was put at some stage to Mr Ngo that he was never a member of the security branch and my question to you is, you did not at any stage give instructions that Mr Ngo was never a member of the security branch?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="597">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="598">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="599">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Do you understand the question?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="600">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="601">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Now Mr Shaw, it was put to Mr Ngo that he was never a member of the security branch.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="602">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Memani, is your question simply did you at an6y time say that he was not a member of the security branch?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="603">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="604">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="605">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="606">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Well, let it be put be put the way you prefer Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="607">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did you ever tell anybody that he was not a member of the security branch ?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="608">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>Mr Ngo, was never a member of the security branch.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="609">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="610">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>If I could just explain.  Mr Ngo was a member of the police, he was at Batu.  If I remember correctly he was on their register and he was not transferred but he assisted security branch members with Colonel Erasmus in identifying suspects until such time as he was transferred to the college.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="611">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>To your knowledge, did Mr Ngo report at Batu police station?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="612">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>As for as my knowledge is concerned he reported to the security offices where he came and did his job but he worked as a student at security branch.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="613">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="614">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="615">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Did you have any differences with Mr Motsamai?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="616">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>No, I had no differences with Mr Motsamai</text>
		</line>
		<line number="617">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="618">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="619">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="620">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>No, I had no differences with Mr Motsamai.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="621">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="622">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="623">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="624">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>ON RESUMPTION</text>
		</line>
		<line number="625">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>(s.u.o.)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="626">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Mr Shaw, did you not in conjunction with Erasmus, arrange for the employment of Ngo despite the fact that he had a criminal record?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="627">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="628">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Did you not, after Ngo was attacked, take steps to have him transferred to Ladybrand?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="629">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="630">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible] it after he appeared did you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="631">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>I said did he not make arrangements to have Mr Ngo transferred to Ladybrand?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="632">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>After something.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="633">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>After Ngo was attacked.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="634">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Oh.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="635">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Did you not, together with Erasmus, make arrangements for the safety of Ngo after he was attacked?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="636">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="637">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Now Mr Shaw, I just want to read a letter contained in bundle B, page 83, written by Ngo which says</text>
		</line>
		<line number="638" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Application for salary adjustment from standard eight scale to standard ten scale Since 1986.02.10 I have been a member of theforce.  I was appointed with a standard eight certificate.  In 1986.01.01 I however passed my matric. I hereby apply for an adjustment in my salary.  A copy of my standard ten certificate is hereby attached&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="639">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Is that letter correct Mr Memani?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="640">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And I will also wish to refer you then to answer the Chairperson&#039;s question to page 63 of bundle B.  This is a letter which is  signed by a lieutenant C. Smith who was I think the divisional commander and it says</text>
		</line>
		<line number="641" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;transfer for safety reasons, number S085H Ngo&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="642">
			<speaker>INTERPRETER</speaker>
			<text>The interpreter&#039;s couldn&#039;t get the name.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="643" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;from the uniform branch to Batu station as indicated&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="644">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Paragraph five:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="645" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;This member&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="646">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>paragraph one:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="647" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;This member, on 86.02.10 joined the force and has since been on the staff register of Batu.  This office temporarily employed him in consultation with the district commander&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="648">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>[if the interpreter could hear correctly] </text>
		</line>
		<line number="649">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Do you agree with the contents of that letter?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="650">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>[Transcriber&#039;s own translation]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="651">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>Is that the one on page 63?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="652">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="653">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="654">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Now we go back to 83 and you can perhaps answer my question.  He says he joined the force on the 10th of February 1986 and was appointed with a standard eight certificate.  He then says that on the 1st of January 1986 he passed his matric, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="655">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="656">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So he passed matric before he joined the police force when he was appointed on a standard eight certificate?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="657">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>It is so Mr Chair, that he passed - I would say that he passed matric on the 1st of January, the certificate would be issued and be valid as from the 1st of January but it may be that at the time when he was actually employed the certificate was not available.  And at that date the certificate was now available and he was being employed on the basis of his standard ten certificate.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="658">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>On his standard eight certificate?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="659">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="660">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So you say he had passed matric by the 1st of January 1986?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="661">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="662">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	It would follow therefore that Mr Ngo was employed not in March but in February and even the divisional commander accepted him as being employed as from February 1986? </text>
		</line>
		<line number="663">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="664">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="665">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="666">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>I think that you are continuing to contribute because this witness has just said that although Ngo was registered with Batu he in fact reported at security offices in Bloemfontein.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="667">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="668">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="669">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>This was the evidence of Mr Shaw before the tea adjournment.  I specifically put that to him and he said it was correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="670">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="671">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, what does he want us to look at and see there.  He must refer us to what his his referring us there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="672">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Is it relevant whether he was appointed in February or March?   The letter also states that while he was at Batu he was employed in Bloemfontein police station.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="673">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="674">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Ja, in Bloemfontein.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="675">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Are you addressing the question to me Mr Chair?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="676">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Ja.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="677">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="678">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>As far as the witness said in his evidence, he said he had been employed as a student constable and then he went to college and after he became a constable, he had no rank before he attended the college.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="679">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="680">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="681">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>But all along Mr Chair we have been told, including yourself, that Mr Ngo only became a member on the 11th of March 1986 as a student constable and that ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="682">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>he became a member a month earlier according to the correspondence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="683">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>That is that is my point.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="684">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible] conceded that the letter is correct so ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="685">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="686">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="687">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And so why am I being asked all these questions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="688">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="689">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="690">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	So you agree that Mr Ngo became a member on the 10th of February 1986?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="691">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="692">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And do you also agree that Mr Ngo was employed with you assistance?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="693">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>No, I do not agree with that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="694">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>My instructions are that you actually took him to ...[inaudible] police station where you assisted with the completion of the application form.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="695">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>No, I deny that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="696">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Do you know a Mr Shedile?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="697">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>Is he a member of the police force?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="698">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="699">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="700">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And my instructions are that you were present when he gave the form to Ngo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="701">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>I deny that I was not present at all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="702">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="703">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>I have no knowledge of that fact.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="704">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Is it your evidence that you have no knowledge at all that security branch was involved in making safety arrangements for him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="705">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct, I have no knowledge of any arrangements made by them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="706">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Are you not aware of the fact that security branch Bloemfontein took steps to have Ngo removed from Bloemfontein to Ladybrand?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="707">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>No, I have no knowledge of that fact.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="708">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="709">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Pages 63 and 64 relate to the period before he went to the college, a few months before he went to the college.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="710">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, its its actually the letter that I will refer to that deals with this.  He says at paragraph 3</text>
		</line>
		<line number="711" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;The leader was well known in the black community&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="712">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;the member&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="713">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="714" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;the member is well known in the black community and the fact that he is now a member of the force quickly became known&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="715">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>paragraph 4:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="716" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;This office over the past period received information to the effect that the radical elements in the black community were planning to act against the member in the form of a necklace murder&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="717">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>paragraph 5:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="718" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;This office recommends that the member without delay be removed from Bloemfontein or transferred from Bloemfontein to a district where he is not known, but preferably in the Ladybrand district&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="719">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Now this letter is signed by lieutenant colonel C. Smith, do you know this person?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="720">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I know Colonel Smith.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="721">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Where did he work?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="722">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>At the security branch as Divisional Commander, Commissioner.   Sorry, he was the Divisional Commander of the security branch.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="723">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="724">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, he was the Divisional Commander of the security branch.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="725">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Before you go away from these letters Mr Memani, perhaps you would like to refer to the letter at 63 - the letter at page 63 was written on the 18th of June 1986, the letter at page 64 was written apparently, best I can read my copy, on the 19th of June 1986.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="726">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="727">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="728">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>And according to paragraph 1 that should be the position up to the 4th of July 1986 when he should report</text>
		</line>
		<line number="729" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot; he had to report for services as student for training&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="730">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="731">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="732">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="733">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Is it correct Mr Shaw that you knew Mr Motsamai as well?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="734">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="735">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="736">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="737">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Is it correct that you also know a person who&#039;s known as Nicos?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="738">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="739">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Now, my instructions from Nicos are that you used to visit him at his house, rather at his shop.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="740">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>I deny that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="741">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>I believe that Mr Molefe, Serame Molefe testified to the same effect.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="742">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="743">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Nor were you at his shop?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="744">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="745">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="746">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="747">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And you do not know anything about a child who died in the vicinity of his shop?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="748">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="749">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>As the Chair pleases, those are my questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="750">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR MEMANI</text>
		</line>
		<line number="751">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr. Brink</text>
		</line>
		<line number="752">
			<speaker>MR BRINK</speaker>
			<text>No, thank you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="753">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR BRINK</text>
		</line>
		<line number="754">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="755">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>None thank you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="756">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO RE-EXAMINATION BY MR VISSER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="757">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="758">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Shaw, you mentioned a few people who worked with you in the then so-called black section.  Were all of you directly under Colonel Coetzee?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="759">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="760">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>That would include Motsamai, Mamome, Ramosoeu, Mtyhala as well?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="761">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="762">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>In other words there was nobody between them and Colonel Coetzee?  They they were taking orders directly and they were answerable directly to colonel Coetzee?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="763">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="764">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="765">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What section was this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="766">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>We referred to it as the black section.  That was the section which dealt with all the riots and black matters and black affairs and they investigated those.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="767">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>There were no Captains or Majors or anything in that section, who were between Colonel Coetzee and the Constables or the Warrant Officers ?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="768">
			<speaker>MR SHAW</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="769">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="770">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>CHAIRPERSON:   ...[inaudible]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="771">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>P&#039;s, yes Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="772">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="773">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The last exhibit I have is P65.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="774">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="775">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="776">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>That is my recollection.  I believe it must be P66 Mr Chairman but I will check on that and I will come back to you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="777">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Well, shall we put it in for the time being and if we have to change it we will do so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="778">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="779" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;The  letter makes provision for a transfer of Detective Constable Morakile, M-o-r-a-k-i-l-e&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="780">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The letter is dated the 3rd of June 1986 and if you look over the page Mr Chairman, you will see paragraph numbered 1 there:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="781" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;The above mentioned member on 23 June 1986, assumed duties at security branch Bloemfontein  &quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="782">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible]  it was the 21st. It turned out to be in fact to be the 23rd Mr Chairman, I just wanted to draw your attention to that difference.  And it deals of course, if you again revert to the 1st page, with:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="783" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Transfer from the stock theft unit Wepener to the security branch Bloemfontein&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="784">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="785">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>My experience is they get put into boxes and then put away in the most unlikely places.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="786">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>The next witness I wish to call is Captain Paul van den Berg.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="787">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="788">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, the short answer is that they they are coded reference numbers.  A, that reference number will refer to A just above - the &quot;Divisional Commander&quot; and B will refer to the reference number of the &quot;District Commander&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="789">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>I think I was referring US169856N/4</text>
		</line>
		<line number="790">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>It is in the heading of the letter Mr Visser.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="791">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="792">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible] lines above, it would seem that that might be the number of sergeant Morakile</text>
		</line>
		<line number="793" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Transfer&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="794">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>and the same number appears.  ...[inaudible] that mgiht be either the number given to the transaction or to the person.  It appears in both places.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="795">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="796">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="797">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="798">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="799">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="800">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="801">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	If he wanted to make a point of this, if this was important to his case he should have contacted - he should have made arrangements for the for documentation to be obtained Mr Chairman, with great respect. </text>
		</line>
		<line number="802">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="803">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="804">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I am indebted to you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="805">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	The witness is Captain van der Berg.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="806">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="807">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>[MR VISSER EXPLAINS MICROPHONES TO MR VAN DEN BERG]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="808">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Carry on.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="809">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Mr van den Berg, were you a member of the South African Police Service and are you at present a member of the S.A.P.?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="810">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="811">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>What is your rank?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="812">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text>Captain.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="813">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And when did you join the South African Police?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="814">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text>31 March 1959.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="815">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And where were you then?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="816">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text>In South West Africa Namibia.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="817">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And did you go over to the security branch and if so when?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="818">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text>During 1960 in Windhoek.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="819">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Were you transferred to the RSA?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="820">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text>During December &#039;82 I was transferred to Bloemfontein.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="821">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And did you join the security branch here?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="822">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="823">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="824">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible] certain Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="825">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text>December &#039;82.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="826">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>In what section did you work here, that is from &#039;82 onwards?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="827">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text>The investigative unit.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="828">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And who was your commanding officer in that unit?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="829">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text>Colonel Coetzee and later Colonel du Plooy.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="830">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>In December &#039;85 you went to Botshabelo where a sub-branch of the security branch was.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="831">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="832">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>You were the commanding officer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="833">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="834">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And who was your second in command?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="835">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text>When I started there it was only I and Warrant Officer Mbanjani.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="836">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And did any further members join later?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="837">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="838">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Can you tell us who they were?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="839">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text>Sergeant Kotze, Sergeant du Plessis.  Kotze, du Plessis, Sergeant Phadi spelt P-h-a-d-i.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="840">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Anybody else?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="841">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text>Constable Mathanya.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="842">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>How do you spell that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="843">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text>M-a-t-h-a-n-y-a.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="844">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Anyone else?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="845">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text>Constable Lehapela, L-e-h-p-l-a.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="846">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Anyone else?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="847">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text>A day later some more came.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="848">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Constable Lesale, do you know him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="849">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="850">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Was he ever a member of that sub unit?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="851">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text>No, never.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="852">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And then reference was made to a Sergeant Smith.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="853">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="854">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And then?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="855">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text>He committed suicide.  He killed his wife and then committed suicide.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="856">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>But the fact is he was only there for a short while?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="857">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="858">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>It is alleged Mr van den Berg that on page 31, by person by the name of Nelson Ngo, that in 1986 there was an incident in which a raid was made and a group of 40 to 45 activists were arrested and brought to the Botshabelo police station.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="859">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="860">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>The page number is 31 Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="861">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>31?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="862">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>31, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="863">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I want to ask you, you were there at grassroots level or at at Botshabelo from &#039;85 onwards.  What was the frequency of incidents where people were arrested in groups, raids that were executed as from &#039;85 to mid &#039;86, was it something that was exceptional or what was your position?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="864">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text>During &#039;86 several groups of youth were arrested and detained.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="865">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>If I merely say to you reference is made to an incident where 40 to 45 people were arrested, would you due to those facts be able to identify an incident in your mind?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="866">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="867">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Is that because it occurred quite often?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="868">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="869">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Mr van den Berg, you said that you cannot identify this specific incident, we&#039;ll leave it there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="870">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="871">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, thank you for reminding me</text>
		</line>
		<line number="872">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>It may be that Mr Memani will follow this up.  I think he objects to you mentioning the name of the school.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="873">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Can I just mention it, perhaps he does not object. On page 31 reference is made to students of a K-g-a-u-w-o high school who were arrested, does that ring a bell?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="874">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text>There was unrest, that was amongst others others one of the schools where there was unrest, and it is apparently of those students that were arrested.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="875">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>However it may be, can you just tell the Committee members that when such a raid was made while you were at Botshabello how were these people dealt with and processed and where did it take place?  Can you just sketch us a picture of how such a typical raid and further processing would have been done.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="876">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	If you will just keep in mind that what you are saying is being interpreted so if you could just wait a little while and break your sentences so that interpretation can be done.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="877">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text>At that stage the people were detained in terms of Section 50 of the Internal Security Act after the state of emergency was announced they were detained because there was unrest. Such action took place as a result of the information we had where people were identified as culprits or and they were responsible for the unrest.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="878">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Lists were made available to people who assisted us in arresting these people, then they were either taken to back of the charge office but in most cases it was done in an open space between the cells and the police station, it was done there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="879">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>If you say an open area or space, what do you mean by that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="880">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text>A section between the charge office and the cells which is closed on the one side by a wall but on the front of the police station there is a safety or security gate, a trellis gate .</text>
		</line>
		<line number="881">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>So members of the public who moved towards the charge office, would they be able to see into this courtyard or whatever you want to call it. Would they be able to see into it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="882">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="883">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Regarding this group once again, when you became aware that you were being implicated in this incident, did you do any thing in order to try to establish exactly which incident is being referred to?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="884">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="885">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>What did you do?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="886">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text>Somebody at Botshabelo, Sergeant Matina, I phoned him and asked him to look at or to establish at the charge office whether the warrants were still available, were there detention warrants at that stage.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="887">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Whether these specific warrants which were filed with the normal warrants, whether they were still available and he informed me that as a result of a routine destruction these things were no longer available.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="888">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>On page 35, it is being stated by Mr Ngo that the members of the security police, as he called them, and the unrest unit who took part in the assault of on these persons who we are referring to were among others Captain Tsomela and then mention is made of Warrant Officer van der Berg, Warrant Officer Mbanjani	Mbanjani and then Katlake Sergeant Smith, Thulo, Sesedinyane and Lesale.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="889">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Now speaking for yourself, did you assault people there at any stage people who were arrested and processed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="890">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="891">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Would you have seen any need in assaulting anybody?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="892">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="893">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>If I may suggest it to you, did you not want to obtain information from these people whom you detained?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="894">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text>The people were detained preventatively as a result of the unrest situation.  We already that they were responsible for the unrest and we did not necessarily require any further information from them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="895">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, thank you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="896">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR VISSER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="897">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="898">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	  Captain van der Berg, were you aware that Mr Ngo was transferred to Pretoria for training?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="899">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text>No, I did not know Constable Ngo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="900">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="901">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR DU PLESSIS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="902">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>I have no questions thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="903">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR STANDER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="904">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="905">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="906">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="907">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Kotze.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="908">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	And do you recall that at some stage he used to drive a four by four Datsun vehicle?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="909">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="910">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="911">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="912">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Did you make enquiries about the occurrence books?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="913">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text>I asked sergeant Matinya to check all existing documentation and he gave me the assurance that the documentation of that time no longer existed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="914">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Did you ask him to look for the cell register?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="915">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="916">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Did you specifically ask him to go and have a look for the OB of the time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="917">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text>I asked him to go to the station commander and to look if there was any documentation such as the warrants and the occurrence books to determine who was detained and when and he reported back to me and said that they no longer existed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="918">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Now that having failed, did you ask any of the persons who were implicated whether they could recollect the incident which Mr Ngo might be referring to?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="919">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text>I did not ask them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="920">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Those those are my questions Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="921">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR MEMANI</text>
		</line>
		<line number="922">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="923">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text>I did not ask Commissioner Tsomela about this.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="924">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Sergeant Kotze, or whatever his rank was, how long was he there in Botshabelo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="925">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="926">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="927">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="928">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Visser?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="929">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>No re-examination thank you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="930">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO RE-EXAMINATION BY MR VISSER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="931">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="932">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text>At that stage Botshabello was a sub branch.  They fell under the head office and on occasion there were members who were involved in such operations.  I cannot recall or join, associate this specific operation with this specific incident where people arrived there.  As a result of the size of the area we made use of usually made use of people from the unrest unit or from the people of Bloemfontein.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="933">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So this was quite a common occurrence of Bloemfontein being there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="934">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="935">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I think he said they were also assisted by</text>
		</line>
		<line number="936">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>members of the riot unit was that the unrest unit?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="937">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="938">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible] also happened quite often?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="939">
			<speaker>MR VAN DEN BERG</speaker>
			<text>Yes, the unrest unit gave the protection and that is why they were involved.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="940">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="941">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>You are excused thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="942">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
		<line number="943">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Visser is there a light at the end of the tunnel?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="944">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I detect a slight note of criticism but I must say ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="945">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="946">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="947">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="948">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="949">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Mr Visser, have you possibly discussed matters with your colleagues?  Do they wish you to call all the witnesses?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="950">
			<speaker>MR VISSER:</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="951">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="952">
			<speaker>TITSI HENDRIK RAMOSOEU</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="953">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, I refer you to Bundle page 35 as well as page 106.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="954">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Ramosoeu, are you Titsi Hendrik Ramosoeu?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="955">
			<speaker>MR RAMOSOEU</speaker>
			<text>That is correct</text>
		</line>
		<line number="956">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Were you a member of the South African police?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="957">
			<speaker>MR RAMOSOEU</speaker>
			<text>That is correct I still am one.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="958">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="959">
			<speaker>INTERPRETER</speaker>
			<text>Still a member.  What is your rank please?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="960">
			<speaker>MR RAMOSOEU</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="961">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Now, did you join the security branch in Bloemfontein at some stage?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="962">
			<speaker>MR RAMOSOEU</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, in 1982.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="963">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And were you placed elsewhere to perform your duties?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="964">
			<speaker>MR RAMOSOEU</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="965">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, and did you go - did you remain in Bloemfontein at all times?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="966">
			<speaker>MR RAMOSOEU</speaker>
			<text>If I remember well, in 1985 - it was the beginning of 1984, I started working at Brandfort.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="967">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>How many members of the ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="968">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Soryy, can we clarify that?  How did you get to work at Brandfort?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="969">
			<speaker>MR RAMOSOEU</speaker>
			<text>We had an office in Brandfort because of Mrs Winnie Mandela.  It was during the time when she was staying in Brandfort.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="970">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, but did you stay in Brandfort?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="971">
			<speaker>MR RAMOSOEU</speaker>
			<text>I was not staying there, I travelled to Brandfort every morning and came back in the afternoon.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="972">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And how many other members of the security branch were there at Brandfort?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="973">
			<speaker>MR RAMOSOEU</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="974">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Now do you know Mr Ngo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="975">
			<speaker>MR RAMOSOEU</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I know him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="976">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Was Mr Ngo ever in Brandfort where he assisted you in your duties?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="977">
			<speaker>MR RAMOSOEU</speaker>
			<text>Not at all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="978">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Did he ever come to Brandfort to participate in any operation together with you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="979">
			<speaker>MR RAMOSOEU</speaker>
			<text>Not at all not with me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="980">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Now Mr Ngo has implicated you as a person who was present when Mr Venter was murdered here in Bloemfontein in February 1989.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="981">
			<speaker>MR RAMOSOEU</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="982">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Do you know where Mr Venter lived?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="983">
			<speaker>MR RAMOSOEU</speaker>
			<text>I have a little light.  I think it was somewhere around Universitas suburb.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="984">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Mr Ngo says that you and Mamome transported HIM by vehicle to the house of Mr Venter on the day that he was instructed to go and murder Mr Venter, is that true?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="985">
			<speaker>MR RAMOSOEU</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="986">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="987">
			<speaker>MR RAMOSOEU</speaker>
			<text>I would dispute that Sir because I do not know Mr Venter.  I only heard that Mr Ngo killed a white person in town and it it is the same person with whom he stayed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="988">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="989">
			<speaker>MR RAMOSOEU</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="990">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Did you have anything at all to do with this group of nineteen arrested persons?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="991">
			<speaker>MR RAMOSOEU</speaker>
			<text>If I remember well, if ever it happened that I had any contact with them, the kind of work I used to do was filling in the forms we wanted to know about the person he historical background when he was born such things.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="992">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, but can you remember this particular incident of the group of 19 people where there were people like Oupa Makubalo and Mr Oliphant and the other witnesses who testified here as victims.  Do you remember ...[End of tape 2B - no follow-on sound]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="993">
			<speaker>MR RAMOSOEU</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="994">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Not that it was from the security branch, I was trying to help the investigator of the case who was handling the the docket.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="995">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>How far did you go with or let me put it this way, what did the investigations reveal with regard to possible culprits?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="996">
			<speaker>MR RAMOSOEU</speaker>
			<text>According to my knowledge the we were not successful to find the suspects and there were no people who were arrested.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="997">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="998">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>How far is Brandfort from Bloemfontein.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="999">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>If I might answer this question, its about 55 five kilometres.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1000">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  So it would take you about half an hour to drive?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1001">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>That is so Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1002">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What time did you go there in the morning?  You said after tea, what time would that be?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1003">
			<speaker>MR RAMOSOEU</speaker>
			<text>It would happen that the my time of departure would vary at times it would be 9 o&#039;clock quarter past nine, half past nine in the morning.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1004">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And your time of return?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1005">
			<speaker>MR RAMOSOEU</speaker>
			<text>Mainly I would arrive in Bloemfontein half past three quarter to four?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1006">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did you have an office in Brandfort?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1007">
			<speaker>MR RAMOSOEU</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Chairperson, there was an office inside the police station which which was part of the police station.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1008">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1009">
			<speaker>MR RAMOSOEU</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1010">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>That would have been from about 10 o&#039;clock clock in the morning till 3 o&#039;clock in the afternoon what about the rest of the day?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1011">
			<speaker>MR RAMOSOEU</speaker>
			<text>My work entailed tapping the phones.  There is cap to connect the cassette or I would listen to the cassette and translate it and write down.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1012">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Were the phones recorded when you were not there?   Was there a machine it recorded everything that was said?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1013">
			<speaker>MR RAMOSOEU</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1014">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So you would spend most of your time listening to cassettes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1015">
			<speaker>MR RAMOSOEU</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1016">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thanks.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1017">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR BRINK</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1018">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1019">
			<speaker>MR RAMOSOEU</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Sir, because at times they would speak Xhosa at times.  In many instances they would speak English but in many instances they would speak Xhosa.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1020">
			<speaker>MR BRINK</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1021">
			<speaker>MR RAMOSOEU</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1022">
			<speaker>MR BRINK</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1023">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR BRINK</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1024">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Just one question Mr Chairman on this oath. Mr Ramosoeu did you - is your understanding of the oath that you took when you went to the security branch ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1025">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, I can see that this is going to be leading.   I think the question ought not to be leading.  I think what Mr What Mr Mr Visser can ask is what was his understanding, not to suggest an understanding to to the witness.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1026">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Let us hear the question before we decide whether its leading or not.  Was it leading Mr Visser?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1027">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1028">
			<speaker>MR RAMOSOEU</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1029">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Did you understand your oath also to entail that it would prohibit you from giving evidence concerning your work in a Court of Law?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1030">
			<speaker>MR RAMOSOEU</speaker>
			<text>If it was an evidence which is related to my work, I will not be able to disclose .</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1031">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chair, I have no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1032">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR VISSER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1033">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1034">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1035">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1036">
			<speaker>HENDRIK JAKOBUS BESTER</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1037">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Mr Bester, are you a former member of the South African police?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1038">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1039">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And when you left the police was your rank that of superintendent?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1040">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1041">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>When did you join the police?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1042">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>On the 31st of January 1969.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1043">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And did you join the security branch in Bloemfontein?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1044">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, on the 11th of April.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1045">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Prior to your coming here ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1046">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1047">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>The witness said the 11th of April 1989.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1048">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Bester, before the 11th of April 1989, where were you then?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1049">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>Since 1985 until I joined the security police or security branch I was doing duty there but I resorted under the detective branch of Bloemfontein.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1050">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Where did you do your duty?  Where were you, into which section were you divided?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1051">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>I worked at the security branch.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1052">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And your present position is?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1053">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>At present I am no longer with the police but at the Technikon.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1054">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1055">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1056">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>The fact that you were working at the security branch, for all purposes, does that mean that you were part of the security branch ?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1057">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>No, the reason was that I was doing investigative work at the security branch, I investigated cases.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1058">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1059">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1060">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>You were a detective?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1061">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1062">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1063">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>All that I did at Brandfort at that stage is if there were criminal cases I had to investigate those cases at Brandfort.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1064">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>So you were not stationed there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1065">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>No, I was never stationed there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1066">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1067">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>No, Tax and I worked together.  Tax did investigative work with me and for the record he is Masoloane.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1068">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Can you spell that for us please?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1069">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>M-a-s-o-l-o-a-n-e, I think that is the correct spelling.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1070">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>did you have anything to do with groups known as the: &quot;Eagles Club&quot; or the: &quot;Anti Comrades Club&quot; or the &quot;Three Millions Gang&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1071">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>No, I had nothing to do with them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1072">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>It has been said by Mr Ngo that on a certain day you were present in the evening when Warrant Officer Ramosoeu spoke to two people, a certain Pitso Pelo and a certain Mr Ntsobole Mahlonja.  We have already spelt it before.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1073">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>No, I never worked ever with him in Brandfort.  I never drove in any vehicle with him.  The people who are being mentioned sound familiar but I did not know them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1074">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Where is this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1075">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Page 42 bundle A Mr Chairman, the last paragraph.  It starts with the words during 1986.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1076">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	If it - you have answered a section of the question but I just want to put it to you that if anybody implies or says that you and Warrant Officer Ramosoeu together with Mr Ngo were between or met people between Bultfontein and Hoopstad in the evening?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1077">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1078">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Do you know anything about a case or an incident where Mr Ramosoeu tried to bribe someone or more people to kill a person called Katoy?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1079">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>I know nothing about that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1080">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Did you have anything to do with the monitoring of Mrs Winnie Mandela in Bloemfontein?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1081">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>No, I had nothing to do with that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1082">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Did you have anything to do ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1083">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did you mean to say in Bloemfontein?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1084">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>No Mr Chairman, in Brandfort.  If I said Bloemfontein that was a mistake and I appreciate you correcting me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1085">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Did you have anything to do with an attack on the clinic or the house of Mrs Winnie Mandela at Brandfort?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1086">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>No I did not.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1087">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Did you have anything to do with anything other than an attack on the house or clinic of Mrs Mandela?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1088">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>When the house was attacked I was the investigative officer.  I could however not succeed in tracing any</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1089">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>suspects and the case was later closed as unsolved.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1090">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	And the clinic, as regards the clinic, the same morning that it burned down I visited it and reported back to Major Coetzee at that stage and the docket was transferred to the Detective Branch at Brandfort and they took the matter further.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1091">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>That is the evidence in chief thank you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1092">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR VISSER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1093">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairman, no questions for the witness.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1094">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR DU PLESSIS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1095">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>Mr Bester, did you have anything to do with a certain Mr White Mohapi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1096">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1097">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>Were you present at the stage when an arrest took place after Mr Ngo apparently or was apparently assaulted?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1098">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1099">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>Were you also involved in that case with the investigation thereof?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1100">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>I will - I could possibly have been involved</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1101">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>indirectly.  I can really not remember whether I was the investigative officer but I was involved indirectly because I did assist with the interrogation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1102">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1103">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1104">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>Have you any knowledge of such occurrence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1105">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>I have no knowledge of it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1106">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>Apart from this particular occasion, did you ever thereafter have anything to do with Mr White Mohapi again perhaps with regard to the investigative work that you had to do?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1107">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>If you just give me a chance to see if I can remember.  All that I can remember is that on occasion I saw Mr White Mohapi in the street where we greeted one another and chatted for a few minutes.  I cannot think that I had anything to do with him in official capacity?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1108">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>Were you the only investigative officer there who did so called posted service?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1109">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>I just want to tell you, let me just rectify this.  The period we are referring to was in &#039;85 and I was part of an investigative team which had not yet been sub-divided.  It was Colonel Ben, Sergeant van Wyk, myself, Constable Strydom.  I think that these were the people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1110">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I just want to tell you that when I was posted, sub divided, it was after the 11th of June 1986 the year thereafter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1111">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>And tell me at the stage when you were doing the investigative work, did you do so under the protection of the security branch, in other words your investigative work?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1112">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1113">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>What kind of investigative work did you do while you were associated with the security branch?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1114">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>The work that I did there was all unrest related, matters which dealt with unrest, stone throwing, intimidation, everything in that group of matters.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1115">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>Am I correct if I say that if there were matters regarding Mr White Mohapi, it would have formed part of your daily duties?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1116">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>If it was unrest related yes, but otherwise no.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1117">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1118">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>I understand the question.  As I have told you I cannot remember everything but I cannot remember that I arrested him again or that I was part of the group that did so, I can really not remember that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1119">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>It is also my instructions that, not specifically you but the Investigative Team as a whole, sometimes withheld information or twisted the information so that he had to be charged or that other circumstances had to prevail around him which was not the correct position.  What would you say about this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1120">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>I have no personal feud with Mr White Mohapi, I would never have been part of such a thing and I cannot see the use of even trying something like this.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1121">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>Would you have said that it would have been in the interest of the security situation at that stage to possibly have him detained?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1122">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>I was not part of the security branch or part of the plans that were made at that stage.  As I have testified, I only did investigative work, I received a docket and I investigated the matter.  I would not fabricate matters or cases against people, I had</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1123">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>too much work to do that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1124">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1125">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1126">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>And therefore I assume that certainly you or members of the investigating team would have done everything in your power even exceeding your power in order, in the case of persons of his stature, to have them accused.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1127">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>If they had committed crimes, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1128">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1129">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>If you wish to repeat, yes you may do so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1130">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1131">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chair, that is not true.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1132">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>I also wish to state to you Sir, lastly, that upon more than one occasion you were either present or involved when Mr White Mohapi was arrested, assaulted and maltreated.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1133">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chair, I vehemently deny that, it is untrue.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1134">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>I have no further questions to the witness thank</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1135">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>you Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1136">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR STANDER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1137">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1138">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1139">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1140">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>Only in April 1989 did I start working at the security branch as a member of the security branch and then I was included in the investigating team of the security branch where we also investigated matters involving political motives.  Unrest in my opinion is not always politically motivated.  I investigated blundering which was not of a political nature in my opinion.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1141">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1142">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I would agree with you.  I was given the instruction to investigate the matter, specifically the house.  In the case of the clinic I said it was not of a political nature and it was transferred to the detective branch at Brandfort.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1143">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>How was it determined that it was not of a political nature?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1144">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>Are you referring to the clinic?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1145">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1146">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1147">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And what prompted you to go there in the first place?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1148">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>I received an instruction from the senior officer to go there because the house had allegedly been burning.  I did the preliminary investigation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1149">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1150">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1151">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Did you also investigate in the attempted murder on Ngo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1152">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>No, I did not investigate that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1153">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1154">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>I was with the detective branch and I did detached services with the security branch.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1155">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1156">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>If that was a questions, yes it was so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1157">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And I do not understand why you do not seem to be prepared to say yes, you were involved in a political nature only.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1158">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1159">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1160">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>In broad terms yes, it would probably have been related, the unrest stemmed from the political situation in the country.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1161">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And you must have come to know about the &quot;Eagles Club&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1162">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>I had nothing to do with them.  I later heard of them, long afterwards I heard of the &quot;Eagles&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1163">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Did you hear about the &quot;Anti-comrades Gang&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1164">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>What I did know was that there were comrades and there were people who were not comrades but I know nothing about anti-comrades but it could have been non-comrades, people who were not comrades.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1165">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>No, a gang that called themselves the &quot;Anti-comrades Gang&quot; or that became known as the &quot;Anti-comrades Gang&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1166">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1167">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>A gang is a formation, did you know a gang that called itself &quot;Anti-comrades&quot;, Bester?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1168">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1169">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>Mister Bester.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1170">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1171">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Bester.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1172">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1173">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1174">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1175">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And did you come to know about the &quot;Three Million Gang&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1176">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>In 1992 I first had something to do with the Three Million gang and that was the first time I heard anything about their existence, that was in 1992.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1177">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Did you come to hear about Mr Peshlani?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1178">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>I know Mr Morgan Peshlani very well.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1179">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And did you know about the attack on his shop?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1180">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>If you could just guide me as to the date approximately when that attack took place?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1181">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1182">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1183">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And did you come to know that his son was involved with a gang that was called the &quot;Anti-comrades Gang&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1184">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1185">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1186">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>I agree with you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1187">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1188">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>How many times must he tell you that he has never heard of such a gang?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1189">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>As the chair pleases.  I was trying to remind him in a way Mr Chairman, it might help him recall to repeat it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1190">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1191">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, may I ask the question for the last time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1192">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1193">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>As the Chair pleases.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1194">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Now Mr Bester, did you come to know about the &quot;Eagles Club&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1195">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I came to hear of them and that was in Bloemfontein and even in Botshabelo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1196">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Did you come to hear about them in Brandfort?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1197">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1198">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>When was it that you heard about them for the first time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1199">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1200">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And at that time, did you come to learn that they had previously been operating in Brandfort?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1201">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>I first heard that they were active in Brandfort after the notice had been served on me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1202">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And we were told in a separate application that certain incidents occurred which involved members of these gangs and comrades.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1203">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1204">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>That the Eagles were involved or which gang?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1205">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1206">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1207">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Let me be brief and say that we heard evidence that there were many occasions where comrades were involved in conflict with these gangs.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1208">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1209">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Mr Bester, I would have expected you as a person who was investigating matters of a political nature in Brandfort, to have become aware of these gangsters during the course of your investigation of these matters.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1210">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>With respect Mr Chairman, the witness was a pains to tell you that he did investigate politically orientated matters, unrest related cases.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1211">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1212">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1213">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Memani, he drew a very clear distinction between investigation of political matters and unrest matters but he conceded that unrest matters in this country could broadly speaking come form a political situation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1214">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1215">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1216">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chair, I will proceed with the witness.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1217">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Bester, we were told that these incident which involved the gangs would be typically matters that you would call unrest related.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1218">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Where were we told that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1219">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Let me rephrase the question Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1220">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Now, we were told that these conflicts between the gangsters and the students took the form of open attacks of the gangsters attacking the students.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1221">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1222">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1223">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Now we were told that some of these comrades reported the matters to the police and nothing was done about those matters.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1224">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>If a case had been made and I had been notified, I would have investigated it or one of my people would have done so.  We had to investigate it, it was our job.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1225">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Now, what unrest related matters did you investigate at Brandfort before 1989?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1226">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1227">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1228">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>A number of persons had been arrested.  I no longer have the names as it occurred in 1985 a long time ago.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1229">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And were these people not associated with the anti-comrades?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1230">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1231">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>To which formation were they associated?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1232">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>They were criminals.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1233">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1234">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>The police had given them the opportunity to disperse.  After they had been warned they attacked the police and they were arrested after that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1235">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1236">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1237">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1238">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chair, I have a problem with the statement: &quot;Bomb attack&quot;.  If we refer to the clinic that had been burnt, I was there alone, I found Mr Mamome there that morning, he did not do the investigation with me, I found him there, he was there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1239">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>I may have misled you, I meant to refer to the day after the clinic was bombed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1240">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1241">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>I see.  Thank you for reminding me.  The point is, you went there with Motsamai.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1242">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1243">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did you say you found Motsamai there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1244">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1245">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>... after me but he was in Brandfort, he was also at the clinic.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1246">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>But previously you said you found Mamome there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1247">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>Mamome and Motsamai.  They way I understood the question, it was Motsamai.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1248">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Did you say you found him there, Motsamai?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1249">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1250">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Now, you seemed also not to be sure whether you found him there or whether he might have arrived there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1251">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>That is entirely correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1252">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Is it possible that he might have arrived there after he had been there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1253">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1254">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1255">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1256">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>I see.  Mr Motsamai - Mr Ngo also told us that you were with him in a vehicle on the night in which the clinic was bombed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1257">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Clinic?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1258">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1259">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>Mr Ngo and I never worked together. Under no circumstances for a single moment, it is a blatant lie, it is entirely wrong.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1260">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1261">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1262">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>My instructions are that you were the investigating officer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1263">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>That is incorrect.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1264">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And Mr Bester, is it true that often members of the security branch charged people merely to harass them?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1265">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1266">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And Mr Bester, do you have any problems with Mr Motsamai?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1267">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1268">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1269">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1270">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>No further questions Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1271">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR MEMANI</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1272">
			<speaker>MR BRINK</speaker>
			<text>No thank you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1273">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR BRINK</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1274">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1275">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>A few.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1276">
			<speaker>FURTHER CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I will try to be as quick as possible about it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1277">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Bester, you said you were on the detached service, were there other members as well who were on detached service at the security branch?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1278">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chair, yes, there were.  But I think after approximately two weeks they departed and I basically remained behind alone.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1279">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>But it did sometimes happen that members from other police stations, for example from Wepener, would be here at the security branch on detached service?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1280">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1281">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1282">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, if that is correct and true then I must say that I did not really associate with the security branch members, because I was investigating I was more at the town where the problems had occurred.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1283">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chair, I have no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1284">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR STANDER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1285">
			<speaker>RE-EXAMINATION BY MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1286">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	You have just referred to the fact that you got to know Mr Ngo as a complainant in an assault case.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1287">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, that is what I said.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1288">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Can you remember in which year the incident in which he was injured took place?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1289">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>Under correction I will say that it was in 1985.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1290">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And was there a trial that followed on that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1291">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1292">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1293">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1294">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>But did a trial follow on that that you were aware of?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1295">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1296">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And the finding of this trial was that these people were found to be not guilty and released.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1297">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1298">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And one of those accused was Mr White Mohapi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1299">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1300">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Are you aware of any other case where Mr White Mohapi  was &quot;taken to court&quot; where he got off scott free except in this one case.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1301">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1302">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I may add Mr Chairman, nor have we been told by Mr White Mohapi of any such case.  This is in regard to the question which you put to the witness just now.  I have no further questions thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1303">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR VISSER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1304">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Bester, were you the person who investigated the bombing of the clinic until the docket was closed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1305">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>No, I was not the investigating officer for a very long time, I did the preliminary investigation but it was handed over to the detective team at Brandfort.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1306">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>The house, what about the house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1307">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1308">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>That was while you were not yet a member of the security branch.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1309">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1310">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>And I believe there was a lot of speculation that members of the security branch, taking into account the political profile then of Mrs Mandela, accusations that the security branch could have been behind that, the bombing of, or responsible for the bombing of the house.  Were you aware of such rumours?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1311">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>No, I was not aware of any such accusations, if I had been I would have investigated it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1312">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>Again given the political profile of Mrs Mandela and the huge interests which the police had in her, did that thought ever occur to you?  That the security branch might have been responsible as a form of harassment?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1313">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>When I investigated that matter I was not part of the detective team and that idea, in those earlier years, would not have arisen.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1314">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1315">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1316">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>So the matter was never investigated from that angle?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1317">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>No, most certainly not.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1318">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>I find this quite surprising in the light of the allegations which were flown around, that the security branch were harassing Mrs Mandela.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1319">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1320">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1321">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1322">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And the clinic?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1323">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>The burnt very badly when I arrived there.  Usually if a place is set alight by petrol then one smells the petrol but I could not smell this and because the case was not investigated any further by me, I showed no further interest in exactly what had caused the fire.  But we did suspect that it could have been a petrol bomb or that it was set alight with petrol.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1324">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1325">
			<speaker>MR BESTER</speaker>
			<text>The whole clinic was filled with smoke, the smell of smoke was overpowering.  If I can just tell you, I remember about a lot of books that burnt and these books were smouldering.  They were on a pile and I think that is what caused the terrible smoke if I can remember correctly.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1326">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1327">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Bester.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1328">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1329">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1330">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1331">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Which date is that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1332">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1333">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1334">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1335">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I feel that it was important to place this date in front of you and that is why this has been done.  I cannot take the aspect any further than that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1336">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1337">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1338">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>It is not my view that the docket be handed in and if this matter has to be discussed in chambers, if it would be necessary that it be discussed in chambers, it may have to be discussed in chambers but I am of the firm view as of now provisional though it may be, that that docket should not be given to us now so that we read the statements in there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1339">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Visser, from the point of view in particular of your clients, all they have to do here for the reason for them to be here is to come and deny that, with regard to the matter in question, that they took part in the assault of Mr Mohapi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1340">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1341">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1342">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1343">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1344">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1345">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1346">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Because your clients had the opportunity to do that when Mr Ngo and Mr White Mohapi gave evidence.  They had not prepared the matter at that stage and they have now, this weekend, seen fit to go and do some research, they are asking for an indulgence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1347">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1348">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>If I can perhaps just add something.  Mr Visser is asking you leave to hand in the docket.  I am sorry I cannot allow this, I have serious objections to this.  This will mean that untested evidence is placed before you, something which none of has the right to cross-examine.  We have already heard ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1349">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1350">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1351">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1352">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1353">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1354">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>That is the reason why I suggested in fairness to Mr Mohapi, it can just be put to him Mr Chairman.  He can deny it ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1355">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1356">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1357">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>But Mr Chairman, I suggest that we continue with his other witnesses at the moment and if he wants to make the application at a later stage he can perhaps make the application if you want to listen to it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1358">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1359">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I call Mr Erasmus.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1360">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Your full names please?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1361">
			<speaker>JACOBUS PETRUS PAULUS ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1362">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>You may sit down Mr Erasmus.  (discussions on microphones)  Colonel Coetzee, I beg your pardon, Mr Erasmus, are you attached to the South African Police Service?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1363">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1364">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And were you previously attached to the security branch of the South African Police?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1365">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1366">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>What is your present rank?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1367">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1368">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And in which unit or section are you presently operating?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1369">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1370">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Who is your immediate senior at present?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1371">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1372">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And who is that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1373">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>That is Commissioner de Wit.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1374">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>When did you join the South African Police?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1375">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chair, I joined them on the 26th March 1977.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1376">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1377">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	You joined the South African Police on 26 March 1977?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1378">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1379">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1380">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1381">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And with the security branch in Bloemfontein?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1382">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1383">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Mr Erasmus, in which section did you operate in the security branch here in Bloemfontein?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1384">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chair, just after I joined the security branch or was transferred to it, I initially worked in the registration office and early the next year I went on a course after which I joined the so-called black section.  After becoming an officer I became involved in the investigating teams and I also dealt with emergency measures and detached services.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1385">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Could we quickly run through this? You were with admin and then you went to black section, can you give us a date when you went to the black section?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1386">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1387">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And you say you went to the investigating unit or did you then go to the emergency measures, detentions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1388">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1389">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1390">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>What was this case?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1391">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>It concerned the State against Ian Auguzulu and six others.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1392">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>While you are referring to courses, could you perhaps tell the Committee members, during the 1986, were you on courses?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1393">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chair.  No, I did not attend courses, not as far as I can remember at the moment.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1394">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>In your black section with which you were involved until mid 1985, who were the people involved in that section with you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1395">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chair, initially we were only a few but when I left we were probably approximately 20 people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1396">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>In order to just keep it short or keep it brief, could I - no okay, then I will leave it.  Could you give us the names of the people who were in the black section?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1397">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1398">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, I missed some of the names.  If we could just possibly just have a repeat.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1399">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>It was me, Terry Shaw, Mamome, M-A-M-O-M-E, Motsamai, there was a Constable Kabusa but he committed suicide at one stage, there was also Constable Mancho.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1400">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Can you spell that to us?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1401">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>M-A-N-C-H-O.  Morakile was there at a stage in the black section.  Hendrik Ramosoeu also worked there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1402">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And Hendrik Ramosoeu, what were his duties?  What did he concern himself with?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1403">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>He worked with us in Bloemfontein but then he went to work exclusively in Brandfort.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1404">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1405">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chair, at an estimate I would say 70 to 80 staff members.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1406">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1407">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>08H30 tomorrow morning.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1408">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1409">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>