<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY HEARINGS</type>
		<location>BLOEMFONTEIN</location>
		<names>MR ERASMUS</names>
							<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=54633&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/bloem/bloem5_2ndngo9.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="376">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, I do not know who took him there.  It could have possibly been members of the security branch, I do not deny that but I do not know who they were.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, this is not important for me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>How can it not be, because it is alleged that you arranged that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>I did not make those arrangements because no arrangements were necessary, Mr Ngo lived there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And that it was actually conveyed by members of the security branch?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>It could possibly have been so, these members could have taken him there after he was discharged from the hospital.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And you told us that you were away when the incident occurred.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>Correct Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>That was never put to Mr Ngo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>I cannot comment on that.  The day that the incident took place I was away, I was not in Bloemfontein.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>No Mr Chairman, during Mr Mohape trial after this incident, I was busy with an officers course.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Let me see what my note says then.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Memani, he was referring to the time when the trial took place.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Can you perhaps remind us what you said?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>I was on the farm with my parents when the incident occurred.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>I think you are now referring to another incident.  I think the question is: &quot;When Mr Ngo was attacked, where were you then&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And you see, from the evidence of Mr Mohape, the attack on Mr Ngo occurred on a school day.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And I thought you just said that the attack took place on Saturday while you were at the farm and you came back the Sunday?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chair, I was on the farm where I was notified about the incident that had occurred.  Some of my colleagues phoned me there and informed me that such an incident had occurred, I think that was the Friday that the incident occurred.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>What surprises me is that this was not put to Mr Ngo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Where is your parents place?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>It is 480 kilometres from Bloemfontein in the Karoo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chair, I visited my parents regularly, it is not strange, it is a fact and those are the facts.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Were you on leave at the time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>I put it to you that your denial that you knew Mr Venter and your version that you were not concerned about him and that is did not matter to you that Ngo suddenly started living with a stranger whilst he was your informer, is untrue.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>The statement is not correct Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And that it is motivated by a desire by yourself to distance yourself from the murder of Mr Venter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Erasmus, I heard you to be saying that the attack, rather the charge of attempted murder on Mr Mohape had nothing to do with security branch.  Was I following the evidence correctly when I made that note?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>Indirectly it had an influence on the security branch because he was an informer but the criminal data was investigated by the detective branch, the security branch was not involved.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>Chair, I on two occasions came across him in Pretoria while I was busy with the court case while he was stationed at unit 19, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker>INTERPRETER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible] because I thought there was a clear misunderstanding.  My learned friend was talking about Mr Mohape and the witness was talking about Mr Ngo and that question and answer just before we went to Mamelodi Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Did you see him at court?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chair, the court case which I am referring to was a case which we investigated, the case was heard in Pretoria and I met him in the street there.  It was not in the court case or in the court where I came across  him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>You came across him twice, was it in the street on both occasions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="61">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="62">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Is it not true that some policemen actually worked with security branch while they were not in fact registered at security branch?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="63">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="64">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="65">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="66">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="67">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>Inspector Nkanja I know.  He was attached to the municipal police and he was included into the police and he was transferred to the security branch, that is my knowledge of him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="68">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Do you have difficulty just conceding that: &quot;Yes, he worked with us for about a year before he actually became enlisted as a member of security branch&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="69">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>No, my knowledge is that when Inspector - Inspector Nkanja was transferred to security branch and then worked there.  I have no knowledge that he previously worked somewhere else or had some relationship or attachment to the security branch before he started working there.  He was included into the staff.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="70">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>You were not even aware that he was from the municipality police?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="71">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>I am aware that he was of the municipal police.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="72">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And Mkwena also, I was told he was from the municipality police and worked for security branch for over a year before he actually became a member.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="73">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chair, my knowledge is that after the municipal police had been taken over by the South African Police and after they had been incorporated they immediately started working with us and this is my only knowledge about these two members.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="74">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="75">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Chairman, if I may go through the notes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="76">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="77">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="78">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>We hear evidence that Mr Nichos was harassed by security branch, from Mr Serame Molefe.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="79">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="80">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Do you have - you seem to be throwing your eyes at your legal representatives, do you want them to assist you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="81">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="82">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Oh I see.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="83">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="84">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Mr Erasmus, you said that - I put it to you that Mr Nichos was harassed by security branch and you said: &quot;Yes&quot; but I just want to make sure because it was not clear from the way I put it whether you intended to confirm that Nichos was in fact harassed by security branch.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="85">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="86">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="87">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>That is not the truth Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="88">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Do you know that Mr Nichos had a night-club?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="89">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I have knowledge of that fact.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="90">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="91">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chair, the night-club was relaxation, a place of relaxation for many of the black members.  I met some of the black members in that night-club.  It was definitely not intended to be harassment.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="92">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Surely this does not involve any offence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="93">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>Honourable Chair, it was stated to me as harassment and that is not the way I saw it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="94">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Was it monitoring perhaps?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="95">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>No, Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="96">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>I fail to see how the attendance of Mr Motsamai at a night-club, his attendance there, I fail to see how that could be a harassment.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="97">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, it causes you discomfort if you are involved in something which the police have an interest in and if the police are there at your place regularly.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="98">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="99">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="100">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>That is why Mr Chairman, I put it to him that perhaps the better word to use is monitor.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="101">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="102">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="103">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Are you now saying the security branch was monitoring the way that a night-club was run, well, a member of the security branch.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="104">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="105">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="106">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>As the Chair pleases.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="107">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="108">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="109">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="110">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>...[No English translation]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="111">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And you heard him say that security branch harassed, used to visit Mr Nichos.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="112">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>I heard that Honourable Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="113">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And that you actually visited Nichos.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="114">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="115">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>You heard Mr Molefe complain, say that Nichos complained that you were harassing him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="116">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="117">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="118">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chair, presence of a member of the security branch on the premises and harassment of an individual are two different things and I do not agree with the harassment.  If the members visited there, no problem with that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="119">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>And when Mr Motsamai testified and said that he petrol bombed the house of Nichos because he was a suspected courier, it was put to him that the house was burnt because he was suspected to be involved in a ritual murder.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="120">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>I have no knowledge of that Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="121">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Did you not give those instructions to your legal representatives?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="122">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="123">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="124">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="125">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="126">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>Or that his shop had been burnt down.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="127">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Now, you heard Mr Serame testify that he was a former Robben Islander, he is a former Robben Islander.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="128">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>That may be so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="129">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="130">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="131">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="132">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>I heard that testimony, yes Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="133">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="134">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chair, after 2 February 1990, the ANC was a legal organisation and the security branch had no interest in further monitoring these people.  And to return to the question, it is absurd that any action had to be taken against Mr Nichos because he had an association with Mr Hani.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="135">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>I am sure that you do not want us to believe that Nichos, rather Serame came back from prison after 1990.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="136">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="137">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="138">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="139">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Can you perhaps give us the date of the attack on the shop of Mr Nichos?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="140">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="141">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR MEMANI</text>
		</line>
		<line number="142">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Brink?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="143">
			<speaker>MR BRINK</speaker>
			<text>No questions, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="144">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO QUESTIONS BY MR BRINK</text>
		</line>
		<line number="145">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chair, I failed raise two aspects with the witness, I will be as quickly as possible with your permission, like yesterday.  As it please Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="146">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Erasmus, I understood that the leaders of the group of 19 on occasion were taken to the local Magistrates Court in order to go and make admissions there.  Do you have any knowledge of that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="147">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="148">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>Because I wish to state to you that on the relevant day, the Magistrate refused to accept testimony of Mr Makubalo and Mr Oliphant because they had been seriously assaulted and this was visible, and for this reason the Magistrate refused to take their admissions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="149">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="150">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>Another aspect which I failed to state to you was, that it was my instruction that you inter alias formed part of the group of security police officers who sometimes changed testimony and/or falsely concocted it in order to get a guilty or not guilty finding.  What do you say to that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="151">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chair, this is a serious allegation made against me and I would like to know who is making this allegation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="152">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="153">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text>I will tell you where it originates from Mr Erasmus.  This information inter alias - these incidents or these attempts to change evidence occurred on occasions when Mr Makubalo was kind of assaulted and you and all your group of security police officers wished to hide these facts because on occasion he was also accused of attempted murder.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="154">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chair, I deny this but I would like to have more information regarding exactly what is being referred to.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="155">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="156">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="157">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="158">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="159">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR STANDER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="160">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And re-examination?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="161">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>None, thank you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="162">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO RE-EXAMINATION BY MR VISSER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="163">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Erasmus, at some point when you were told that some of the people in the group of 19 were assaulted on the 5th floor, you said something like you had not received any complaints from them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="164">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chair, I was not involved with this group.  What I said was that I had never heard of any complaints from the side of these people and that also on occasion I visited them and that no complaints were mentioned to me or raised by them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="165">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>You visited them in prison?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="166">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>I visited them at Glen Police Station on a Saturday evening when I was officer on duty while they were in detention.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="167">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>Did you go there specifically for the purpose of asking them whether they had any complaints?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="168">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>That was one of our tasks, to go and take care of these people to hear whether there were any complaints or problems.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="169">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>You would have told them that you are a member of the security branch?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="170">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, affirmative Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="171">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="172">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>I agree to that Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="173">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="174">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="175">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>had to be provided.  There were indeed problems raised with us, not necessarily assaults.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="176">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>Of course I was asking you questions about assaults?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="177">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="178">
			<speaker>RE-EXAMINATION BY MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, may I be allowed, perhaps just to take this aspect one step further.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="179">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	In 1986 Mr Erasmus, were there regulations applicable to visits to or controls over detainees in terms of security legislation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="180">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chair, there were a number of instructions given.  There were detention files that were kept, visitors files and all the visits by staff, personnel as well as visiting officers of the uniform police, district surgeon, Magistrates etc., were recorded.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="181">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>So what you are saying is that all these people who visited those detainees, the records were kept?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="182">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, and also when the Section 29 detainees were visited.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="183">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR VISSER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="184">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="185">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, I just wanted leave to put something along the lines of his visit which I forgot to put to the witness.  Can we perhaps deal with that before he deals with the floor?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="186">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="187">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="188">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>The top indicates North.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="189">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Okay, that is affirmative.  Then the South is Fountain Street and on the Western side is Aliwal street.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="190">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="191">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Okay, the fact is that two of the sides of the building front on the street?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="192">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is affirmative.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="193">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="194">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="195">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Carry on.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="196">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="197">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chair, there was a detention file specifically for this purpose.  In very few cases, if any, one had to make an entry in an occurrence book.  It was a little visits file in which all the visits to these detainees had to be recorded.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="198">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>My understanding is that when cells are visited, the regular visits by the police station themselves and when other people like the red cross and lawyers come in, a note is made that a visit is taking place at a particular time, in the occurrence book.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="199">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, the normal station staff use the occurrence book to record routine visits but visits by other people besides the station staff will be entered into the visitors file.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="200">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="201">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>I can go and make enquiries ...[End of tape 3, side A - no follow-on sound]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="202">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="203">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And did you know about his duties in Brandfort?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="204">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>I was informed regarding his services Honourable Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="205">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did you have anything at all to do with them?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="206">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="207">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="208">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, the vehicles were basically allocated to a person.  They were all government vehicles, not private or personal vehicles.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="209">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But he used your government vehicle, did he?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="210">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, on a number of occasions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="211">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="212">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>[no sound on tape]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="213">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="214">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>[No sound]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="215">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="216">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="217">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>P67.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="218">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>[No sound]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="219">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Right.  Are you going to ask him questions about the building or should I?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="220">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I can do it Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="221">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Erasmus, when you mentioned the street names on the side of the buildings on Fountain Street where the security police was, Commissioner de Jager asked whether the Northern side was above and this gave rise to the confusion that Fountain Street was described as being on the Southern side of the building.  Can you tell us what the correct situation is?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="222">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, Fountain Street is on the Northern Side of the building, Aliwal Street is on the Western side of the building.  The floor plan should just be turned around.  It was correctly entered on the plan although the directions were not clearly indicated.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="223">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And is it correct that on the Southern end of the building in Aliwal Street is the entrance to the parking area?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="224">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>Of the building itself, the Southern side of the building?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="225">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="226">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>There are five parking lots there, parking spaces at the back side of the building.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="227">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And there is an enclosed parking area walled in at the back of the building, about where the letter of the big number 4 is on the plan.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="228">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="229">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And there is an entrance into the building in the parking area?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="230">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="231">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And that is on the Southern wall of the portion of the building running along Fountain Street?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="232">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>That is also correct Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="233">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And I understand that from the entrance you can get access to the lifts which are shown on the plan as being on the corner of Aliwal Street and Fountain Street of the building?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="234">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="235">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Right.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="236">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="237">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.  On the 4th and the 5th floors, there were trellises which limited access.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="238">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>But a member of the public, would something prevent him to take the lift to the landing of the 4th and the 5th floors?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="239">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>When the Divisional Commissioner was there, there was a guard in front of the doors but there was no limited access.  At the moment there is a trellis door at that entrance.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="240">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="241">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, many people had that access.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="242">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="243">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="244">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="245">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Form SAP 172.  And the way in which you have to read it, if you look at the little block on the left-hand side of both pages - do you have a copy in front of you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="246">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="247">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>What can you tell us about the form, what is this all about?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="248">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="249">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="250">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR VISSER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="251">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="252">
			<speaker>MR ERASMUS</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Mr Chairman, and on the other side is the offices of the Attorney General.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="253">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="254">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR VISSER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="255">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Perhaps we should deal with that now.  As I understand it - and correct me please, we realised when we adjourned yesterday that we had different views as to what you said, you have found a docket which contains statements from various people including policemen, relating to what was said by White Mohape.  It is not a statement made by White Mohapi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="256">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>The docket also includes three statements made by White Mohape Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="257">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Is it just one of those three that you wish to put in?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="258">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Basically one of the three, yes Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="259">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So it would be a questions of recalling White Mohapi and saying to him: &quot;Did you make this statement&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="260">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Chairman.  Apart from that there are two other - there are in total four documents which we believe, with respect, we should pay attention to.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="261">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="262">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairman, it is our submission that it effects Mr Ngo and that is really the basis why we wish to place this before you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="263">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>It will just to be to put it to - to recall White Mohapi and put to him the statement?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="264">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="265">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="266">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, yes, obviously.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="267">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What do you say?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="268">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="269">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You object to it being ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="270">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="271">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="272">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="273">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="274">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="275">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Can you tell us, was it before or after the assault on Mr Ngo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="276">
			<speaker>MR STANDER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="277">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="278">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>WITNESS EXCUSED</text>
		</line>
		<line number="279">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="280">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I understand that Mr Brink may have a witness, the person who arrived here and is unrepresented but we can deal with that later.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="281">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="282">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="283">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="284">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="285">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="286">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>CIA, Criminal Intelligence Agency, sorry.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="287">
			<speaker>MR MEMANI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="288">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="289">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>...[No English translation]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="290">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="291">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Mr Coetzee, are you a retired Brigadier from the South African Police Services?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="292">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="293">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Do you know that certain allegations have been made against you in these applications, of offences and unlawful deeds that you have committed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="294">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="295">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>What is your reactions to these allegations?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="296">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>I reject it completely.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="297">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Have you initially, when you in March last year became aware of these allegations, did you visit Mr Wagner in his offices in Pretoria?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="298">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="299">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And did you make an affidavit contained in bundle B, page 15 to 17?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="300">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="301">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Do you have that affidavit in front of you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="302">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="303">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Do you confirm the truth and the correctness of the contents?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="304">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="305">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Did you later - did it later come under your attention that Mr Motsamai implicated you in certain offences or unlawful deeds?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="306">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="307">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And then, did you make another affidavit?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="308">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="309">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And is that the affidavit contained in bundle B, pages 90 to 91?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="310">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="311">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Do you confirm that the contents are correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="312">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="313">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Is it correct that on the 30th of January 1962 you joined the South African Police?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="314">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="315">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And is it also correct that on the 31st of August 1980 you joined the security branch in Bloemfontein?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="316">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="317">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>I understand that you worked in various departments?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="318">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="319">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>The first was the investigative unit when you arrived here?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="320">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="321">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible] was?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="322">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>The investigation section Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="323">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	And at that stage you were mainly working with terror and sabotage investigations?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="324">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="325">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>This lasted till 1985, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="326">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="327">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>When you were transferred to the black section?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="328">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="329">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>There you were the commanding officer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="330">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="331">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="332">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Is it also correct that from the 1st of January 1989 you were appointed second in charge of the regional Orange Free State branch of the security police?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="333">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="334">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And then lastly, in December 1989 you say that you were transferred to Soweto?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="335">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="336">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>What were you there and which position?  What was you status there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="337">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>I was appointed in the inspectorate, the watchdog of the officer commanding.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="338">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>And in March 1994 you became the regional head of the Witwatersrand?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="339">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="340">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Was it the police or the security branch?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="341">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>No, the security branch.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="342">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="343">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>More or less Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="344">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Can you give us an indication of how many members there were in the security branch in Bloemfontein during those two years, in total?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="345">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="346">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>During the time you were involved in the black section, did you hear about Mr Ngo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="347">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="348">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="349">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>That is not true.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="350">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Did you like Mr Ngo, Mr Coetzee, tell us?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="351">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, I was against his transfer to the security police.  As a student I did not like him very much but the commanding officer wanted him there and I just accepted him, I tolerated him there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="352">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Was that a person whom you would take into your confidence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="353">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="354">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>His handlers were Mr Erasmus and in his absence, Mr Shaw.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="355">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="356">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>What about Mr Motsamai?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="357">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, he worked mainly with Motsamai and Mr Mamome.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="358">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>That was Mr Ngo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="359">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="360">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="361">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Ngo involved you or implicated you in the murder and robbery on Mr Venter.  He said in his application on page 8 of bundle C and following on that that you instructed him to murder Mr Venter and that you had to see to it, on page 8, that this murder would appear to have been a robbery and a break-in.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="362">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>[No English translation]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="363">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>He also said that after he had committed this task in co-operation with Mamome and Ramouseau, he reported back and you were not satisfied that they did not remove enough articles from that house and that you thought he had to remove more articles from that house to simulate a break-in.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="364">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>I deny it wholeheartedly.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="365">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="366">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>Nothing at all Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="367">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="368">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>I know nothing about that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="369">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>And did you give any such instructions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="370">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>No such instructions Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="371">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>He also says, on your instructions Ramaseou, Mamome, Motsamai and Mtyhala and he himself Mr Ngo, went to the clinic of Mrs Mandela and that they found an object which could set something alight, a kind of a phosphorus grenade.  They threw that into the clinic and this resulted in the clinic being set alight.  Did you give such instructions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="372">
			<speaker>MR COETZEE</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="373">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="374">
			<speaker>MR VISSER</speaker>
			<text>Do you know ...[no sound]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="375">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I have a request for a short adjournment which I will grant.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="376">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>