<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY HEARINGS</type>
		<location>CAPE TOWN</location>
									<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=54647&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/capetown/capetown_1kond2.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="373">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>do with it and actually they are saying that the foot soldiers did this on their own, let us just get back to that.  You....(tape ends)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>The security branch was involved that you reasonably ascertain where a person was, when he left the country, when left Lesotho with the aeroplane etc., is this correct? - this is regarding the Eastern Cape.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Kondile disappeared - I know it goes a bit broader but there are also other people who disappeared without a trace, which resulted in enquiries made in the media etc.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>The standard apology which was offered by you most of the time, was that the person had left the country to join the ANC, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Now, the investigation of these allegations.  You are a policeman yourself, what was the impression?  How hard did you try to investigate these allegations?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Did they ever - was any enquiries directed to you where you were asked whether these people infiltrated: &quot;Where is the man, that we can answer the questions&quot;, &quot;We have the intelligence network, can you tell us where he is&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>No, we did not.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>My impressions were that it was either the security force or the defence force.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>In other words, South African security forces?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Be it military or police?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Mr du Plessis, did you have anything personal against Mr Kondile?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Most definitely not.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Your contact with Mr Kondile resulted from the work that you did?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>No, not at all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>If it was not for the fact that he was involved in the underground war that was raging and you as well, do you think that it would ever have resulted in his death - that you had planned and taken part in his death?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Definitely not.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>As far as you are concerned today - the political struggle has been fought and many people on both sides have died during that political struggle, as far as you are concerned, did you ever act as far as these matters are concerned other than as a security policeman?  Your actions as in the case of Kondile, did this have anything to do with the fact - did it have anything to do anything other than your duty as a security policeman?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Do you therefore confirm the contents of the application, together with the additional evidence that you gave?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>The vehicle was never there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>You link the death of Mr Kondile to the telexes and the occurrence book entrants of August, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>According to you, the death of the 10th of August when he was released, when was he killed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>The next day, the 11th of August.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>I have no knowledge of this, it was definitely not like this.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>As far as your knowledge goes, did Mr Kondile sustain a brain injury?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Did you ever fear that he would have a brain injury?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Was he killed in order to hide such a brain injury?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>The allegations regarding assaults which have already been made, you acknowledged that you also assaulted Mr Kondile and that you heard that he had complained that the East London people had assaulted him, is that the sum total of your knowledge of the assaults?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>After you realised that the man had ...[inaudible], did you assault him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Did he still work with you and give you information?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>The information that he gave then, was it still correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>I cannot think of one case that was not correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Would it have served any purpose when you realised that the man was not prepared to co-operate with you, to go further?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="61">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>No, not at all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="62">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>The reason why you assaulted him, what was that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="63">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="64">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>In conclusion, you assaulted him to get information out of him, information needed for police investigations?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="65">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="66">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairman, I have no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="67">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR BOOYENS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="68">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Your initials are?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="69">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>H.B., Hermanus Barend Du Plessis.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="70">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>And your rank at that stage was - in 1981?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="71">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Captain as far as I know.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="72">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Was there a Brigadier Du Plessis at that stage?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="73">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Not that I know of.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="74">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Was there not a Brigadier who was a Commanding Officer of the Boarder Police, a H.J. Du Plessis?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="75">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="76">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Was there more than one van Rensburg in Port Elizabeth?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="77">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="78">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The decision to eliminate Kondile was as I understand, taken by three of you, Erasmus, van Rensburg and yourself?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="79">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="80">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And as I understand, Erasmus was at that time the most senior of the three of you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="81">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="82">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>After the execution of Kondile, did you have to report to anybody who was your superior, that Kondile had been killed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="83">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="84">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>When Kondile had complained that he had been assaulted by the police in East London, did he use the word: &quot;assault&quot; or did he use the word: &quot; torture&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="85">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>No, he said: &quot;assault&quot;, he used the word: &quot;assault&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="86">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did you ever bother to find out what the nature of that assault was?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="87">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Unfortunately not.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="88">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Whilst you were interrogating him, what injuries did he receive?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="89">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>External injuries: none at all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="90">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="91">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>I want to believe that he - it was possible that he was examined but I cannot remember and nor do I have any documentation to prove this.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="92">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>That was not at your request?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="93">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>It is possible, but I cannot remember.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="94">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Was it not as a result of an injury that Kondile had sustained to his head, that required examination?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="95">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Definitely not.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="96">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did the doctor tell you what the result of his examination was of Kondile?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="97">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>I cannot recall at all that Kondile was examined by a doctor, what I am saying is that it is possible that a doctor could have seen him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="98">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Who to your knowledge, would be the one who might know whether Kondile was examined by a doctor?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="99">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>I do not know.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="100">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="101">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>If I can remember correctly, I think it was Warrant Officer Jonker who was the station commander.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="102">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Who was the most senior of the security police at the time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="103">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="104">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="105">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Now General Erasmus, then General van Rensburg and after him it was I.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="106">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="107">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>I do not understand what you mean.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="108">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="109">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>I think he would have had to make that complaint to the station - commanding officer and they would have informed us and the necessary arrangements would have been made for him to see a doctor.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="110">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Now, I want to talk about something else now, what happened to the documents that you had found on his bed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="111">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>They were destroyed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="112">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>By whom?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="113">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>The documentation that he wrote to me, I destroyed and the other one - I do not know what happened to that, I do not know what happened to the notes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="114">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="115">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Are there any questions that you would like to put to this witness?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="116">
			<speaker>CROSS EXAMINATION BY MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>There are.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="117">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Erasmus, I want to direct your attention to the last page, the last question of your application that is on page 22 of the 1st Volume.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="118">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>This is Mr Du Plessis.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="119">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="120">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Under question 14, you say that you have tried in the application to make it as complete as possible, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="121">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="122">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>But today with your verbal testimony, we have seen quite a lot - we have heard quite a lot which does not appear in the application at all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="123">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="124">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, I was coming to that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="125">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	What in fact happens with your statement, is that you gloss over everything and really start in essence, with the meeting you have with your senior, would that be correct or a fair summary?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="126">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>We met one another before we made these statements.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="127">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>By: &quot;we&quot;, you mean?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="128">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="129">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>And it would at least include the three other applicants we have listed in this application, that is Mr van Rensburg, Mr Raath and Erasmus, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="130">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>I think they were also there, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="131">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>Was anyone else from the Eastern Cape who was there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="132">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Niewoudt was there as far as I can recollect.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="133">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>Anyone else?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="134">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="135">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>Of course there could have been other people?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="136">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>It is possible, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="137">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>And was this just one meeting or a series of meetings where you exchanged statements?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="138">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>No, it was only one meeting we held as far as I can remember.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="139">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>And when was that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="140">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>It was shortly before the due date, it was shortly before these statements were made.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="141">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>And where did you get together?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="142">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>We met in Pretoria.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="143">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>So, would it also be fair to say that you exchanged information and you basically decided together what should be in the application and what should not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="144">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="145">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>You also had before you at that stage already, the statement by Mrs Kondile as well as by Dirk Coetzee, did you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="146">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="147">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>Had you seen it at that point?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="148">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="149">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>I want to refer you to page 59 of Volume 1 - this is a statement made by you.  Look at paragraph 2 of that statement, could you read it out to us?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="150">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR DU PLESSIS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="151" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="152">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="153">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="154">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="155">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="156">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>So, in fact you did have knowledge of the allegations made by Mr Coetzee?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="157">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="158">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>You were obviously not involved with the actual arrest of Mr Kondile, did you hear about this though immediately that it occurred?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="159">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>That he was arrested?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="160">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="161">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="162">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="163">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="164">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>Now, it is the version of my client that Mr Kondile was not in fact arrested trying to come back into the country, he was arrested - he was in fact kidnapped from the Lesotho side.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="165">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="166">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>You have told us that you grew up in a strict Afrikaner home and your family were members of the Dutch Reformed Church.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="167">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="168">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>I take it, that includes yourself?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="169">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="170">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>Later on in your testimony you told us that you had to do what is necessary and did not care about the destruction of family and family structures, in pursuing what had to be done to protect the government, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="171">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I did not say that directly but for me what was important was the total onslaught and the protection of the government of the day, as well as the white population in South Africa and therefore I was prepared.  I was trained and I was indoctrinated in this way and I thought I was right at that stage in doing so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="172">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>You say, at that stage you thought it was right?  You have actually gone to great lengths to highlight the political nature as you consider it, of your actions.  Do you still consider it right? - I think the term you use is that you were protecting Western and Christian values.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="173">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="174">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>You also said that you acted in a bona fide manner in doing what you did?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="175">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="176">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>Indeed you say you acted in that fashion at all material times - that you acted in good faith at all material times?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="177">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="178">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>But Mr Du Plessis, you surely knew that the actions you executed were unlawful, they were illegal, did you not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="179">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I knew that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="180">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>So the reality is that you would stop at nothing to achieve what you call political ends?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="181">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="182">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>Even if it meant killing a 23 year old and burning his body?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="183">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="184">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>You say that was the only alternative.  Other people have spent time in detention, some as much as 27 years, was that not an alternative?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="185">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>It was not.  If that was the case, he had contact with other people and he would expose the information network and we would have been cut off regarding information and that would have been catastrophic for the Eastern Cape.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="186">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>Up to the time that you actually visited Mr van Rensburg, you were in fact in charge of the interrogation, is that not so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="187">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="188">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>Indeed, up to that point there was no need to consult your superiors as far as the interrogation in the Eastern Cape was concerned?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="189">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="190">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>And when you say: &quot;headquarters&quot;, where is that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="191">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Firstly, in Port Elizabeth and then security headquarters in Pretoria, that is what I did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="192">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>And as far as headquarters was concerned, who in fact was the most senior person in the Eastern Cape?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="193">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Now General van Rensburg and Colonel Erasmus.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="194">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>So in fact, when you consulted the superiors that you consulted when you realised there was a problem, you were consulting headquarters, not so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="195">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="196">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>And being overall in charge of the interrogation at that time or up to that point, any injuries that were sustained and any assaults perpetrated on Mr Kondile, you would be ultimately responsible, not so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="197">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="198">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>From the time he arrived at Humansdorp, where in fact you first saw Mr Kondile, do you know - plus minus, how many times he been interrogated?  Was it a daily thing or were there gaps in-between, what happened?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="199">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="200">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="201">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>No, I was at all times in charge of interrogation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="202">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>And were you at all times physically present during such interrogations?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="203">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>No, no.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="204">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>Other people would then be ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="205">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>Sorry to interrupt.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="206">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="207">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>No, he was also interrogated by other people.  For example, in East London I was not present during his interrogation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="208">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="209">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="210">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>Now, I was talking about the Eastern Cape, were you always physically present when Mr Kondile was interrogated with regard to Eastern Cape? - that as I understand it, is P.E. and environments?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="211">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="212">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>So, if Mr Kondile sustained injuries - serious or otherwise, you would definitely know about that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="213">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>I think so, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="214">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>So what your evidence really is, is that Mr Kondile sustained no injuries and certainly not the injuries of the nature described by Mr Coetzee who received it in turn according to him, from Mr van Rensburg?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="215">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="216">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> MR MOOSA:   And what that must mean is that Mr Coetzee is lying to us, not so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="217">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="218">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>Well, he certainly said that he was told the man was seriously injured but to him the man looked normal.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="219">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="220">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>But you are saying that he is lying in relation to what he says he heard from Mr van Rensburg?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="221">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="222">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="223">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="224">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible] questions was put properly, in the sense that I asked very clearly - I stated very clearly that this is what he got from Mr van Rensburg, I did not say that this was information that Coetzee was imparting directly.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="225">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="226">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="227">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="228">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="229">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Comment on what?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="230">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>On whether you are lying - on whether you are saying that Mr Coetzee is lying about the information he said was imparted to him by Mr van Rensburg?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="231">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="232">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Coetzee is also telling us that he saw the vehicle that Mr Kondile was using and he describes that vehicle, are you aware of that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="233">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>I am.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="234">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>Now, are you saying that Mr Coetzee is lying in relation to that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="235">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Definitely.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="236">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="237">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>Now, taking it that you are saying that Mr Coetzee is lying in relation to that aspect, the question that I have for you is, what reason does Mr Coetzee have to lie?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="238">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="239">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="240">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="241">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="242">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="243">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="244">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="245">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>I have quite a way to go.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="246">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="247">
			<speaker>INTERPRETER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="248">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="249">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="250">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>ON RESUMPTION</text>
		</line>
		<line number="251">
			<speaker>ADV DE JAGER</speaker>
			<text>You are still under oath.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="252">
			<speaker>HERMANUS BAREND DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>(s.u.o.)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="253">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>CHAIRPERSON:   Mr Moosa?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="254">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="255">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="256">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>No, not that I know of.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="257">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>Does that mean he never visited you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="258">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="259">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>Now you say you found a note under the bed in which you were waiting for Mr Kondile to have a bath, is that right?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="260">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="261">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>Then there was a bed in those quarters, and was it the same quarters that were depicted in the photo album which is in Volume 1? - that is pages 35 to 38 of Volume 1.  If you look at that photographic album, photograph A gives us a general overview of the police station and if you look at C on page 38, you can see the room where Mr Kondile was allegedly held, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="262">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, but we are referring now to the offices and in my letter I referred to the cell.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="263">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>Was Mr Kondile interrogated in the room which is depicted in photograph C on page 38?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="264">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="265">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="266">
			<speaker>UNKNOWN</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="267">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="268">
			<speaker>UNKNOWN</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="269">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="270">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>Well, also a big window Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="271">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="272">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Coetzee has always mentioned that he found it strange that Mr Kondile was held in what he called: &quot;The White Quarters&quot;, are you familiar with that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="273">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>I think he put it like that, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="274">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="275">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="276">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>Well, you can comment on this, Mr Kondile was surely a big fish, he was a very important catch for the security branch, not so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="277">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="278">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="279">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>In connection with what?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="280">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>In the way you hold him, in the way you make sure that he is secure and guarded all the time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="281">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>While he was in the cells he was not guarded, he was guarded in the office or in the single quarters later on.  There were policemen who were on night duty and they did night duty at those cells.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="282">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>When we spoke of a big fish Mr Du Plessis, this man was a trained terrorist in your own version, who was close to Chris Hani, is that right?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="283">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="284">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>Could you give a reason why he was interrogated for quite a while by policemen other than in the Eastern Cape section of the security branch?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="285">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="286">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>Well, let me start again, you were in daily contact with Bloemfontein and it is Bloemfontein that I was referring to.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="287">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>No, I was not in daily contact with Bloemfontein, I would say: &quot;on a daily basis&quot;.  Before he went - was transferred to Port Elizabeth, I was in contact with him and they with me but not on a daily basis.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="288">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>The question really is, why was he interrogated by the policemen in Bloemfontein for what was in fact a period of as much as two weeks?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="289">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="290">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="291">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>I think that they would have decided that later on but initially I decided that he should be transferred.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="292">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="293">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>I think so, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="294">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>So surely Mr Du Plessis, you are in a position to answer on basis Mr Kondile was interrogated by security branch policemen who happen not to be from the area in which he would likely be ...[indistinct]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="295">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="296">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="297">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="298">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="299">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="300">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="301">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, did you want to highlight something in this encrypted message?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="302">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="303">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="304">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="305">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="306">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="307">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="308">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="309">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="310">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Unfortunately that is the case, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="311">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>What does emerge quite clearly [indistinct] which you felt he would be best able to fill.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="312">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="313">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="314">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>I took all possible steps, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="315">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="316">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="317">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>Besides yourself who was effectively in charge, who were the other policemen involved at different times in the interrogation of Mr Kondile?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="318">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>I cannot give you detail, what I do know is that Sergeant Raath was involved, he was also with us when we went to the Division Border and Transkei with him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="319">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, anybody else?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="320">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>As far as the guarding was concerned, Sergeant Dunster was involved.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="321">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>Talking about Sergeant Dunster, you have no doubt seen his statement?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="322">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="323">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>It appears Mr Chairman, at pages 42 to 52 in the 1st Volume.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="324">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Now, did I get you right, Mr Dunster was involved in the guarding, are you saying that he was not involved in the interrogation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="325">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>As far as I can recall, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="326">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>Of course that means that he was involved in the interrogation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="327">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="328">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>Anything is possible, and in his statement he says he was indeed involved, is that right?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="329">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="330">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="331">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="332">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>Does this jog your memory, were these other people present who are listed here besides Sergeant Raath?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="333">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="334">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>Niewoudt was involved with Mthimkhulu, you are however saying he was not involved with Kondile at all?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="335">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="336">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>The Dunster affidavit also tells us about methods of interrogation and on page 42, it speaks about: &quot;The Spook&quot; which is how a certain method was referred to in security circles, do you know about: &quot;The Spook&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="337">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="338">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>Tell us about: &quot;The Spook&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="339">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="340">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="341">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>I have no knowledge of that.  I do know that I requested him to go together with Mr Raath to guard him in the single quarters.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="342">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>But he is specific, he talks about the torture of Sizwe Kondile.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="343">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>I cannot help you any further.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="344">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>Of course you are the person who would know if there was torture?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="345">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="346">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>And what he said is, that Mr Kondile was severely tortured and that the words: &quot;We do not want another &quot;Biko&quot; case&quot;, came from you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="347">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Most certainly not.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="348">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>Are we to believe that this is a coincidence, that the same words were uttered by Mr Coetzee who claims he got it from Mr van Rensburg?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="349">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="350">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>Well, lets see what we have, we have you who lied in a statement, lied to the Harmse Commission, would you agree with that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="351">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="352">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="353">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>I do not want to express an opinion on that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="354">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>And the tubes and the electrical tyre shocks which were described at length by Mr Dunster, you say never occurred?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="355">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Not with this person, definitely not.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="356">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>Well, Mr Dunster has other important information for us and this is that Mr Kondile refused to give you certain vital information.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="357">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>I have no knowledge of that, perhaps he concealed things from me but I do not know about it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="358">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="359">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>I deny that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="360">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="361">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>I have no comment.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="362">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="363">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="364">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>There would be very few people who could really tell it to him, one of them would be yourself, the other Mr Raath and perhaps Mr Dunster.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="365">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>Or possibly Mr van Rensburg.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="366">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>Or possibly Mr van Rensburg.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="367">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="368">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="369">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="370">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="371">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text>I can tell you that there are court cases where such things have been happening which served as confessions or tried to serve as confessions, pages were written from the cells.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="372">
			<speaker>MR MOOSA</speaker>
			<text>But here - according to your version, you are talking about someone who wants you to believe that he is co-operating and he is willing to work for you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="373">
			<speaker>MR DU PLESSIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>