<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY HEARINGS</type>
	<startdate>1998-03-02</startdate>
	<location>PORT ELIZABETH</location>
	<day>6</day>
	<names>ERIC TAYLOR</names>
							<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=54810&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/pe/cradock6.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="392">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker>ERIC TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> Mr Taylor, you are applying for amnesty for the death of the four deceased which we&#039;ve already heard about, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>As well as the harmful - Your Honour, can I please ask, with reference to the previous applicants too, that paragraph 9(a) 1 as far as it may be possible that it should be added after the death of the four named persons</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;and all other offences or ...[indistinct] which are associated with that&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Taylor, go to page 1 of your application.  On page one you provide your personal particulars, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>And you refer to your history on page 2, and you said that on the 31st of December 1995 you retired from the police service on medical grounds.  Possibly just to tell us more about Eric Taylor the man, tell the Commission, keep it as short as possible - during consultations you&#039;ve told me that your police career right from the beginning till you left the service happened during a state of conflict.  Will you just explain to the Chairman what your police career entailed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, I had very little opportunity in my career to do ordinary policing.  Even when I was in the police college, and I went there right after matric, we were deployed during our training and we were deployed into the Mamelodi township in the 1976 unrest situation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	During the same year I did counter-insurgence  courses and those courses were interrupted twice and we went to Paarl and Cape Town and at later instances we were deployed also in Soweto.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	In the next year I went to the border and I was situated in Ovambuland.  A year later I was transferred to the security branch and there I became involved to quite a different approach to policing than the ordinary policemen and the traditional policing activities.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Can you expand on this other approach, what does that entail?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>For the first time I came to know about the threats by ANC alliance.  I came into contact with politics.  And I just want to mention that at that time it was really prestige to be employed by the security branch, to be recruited by them for this purpose. 	It was regarded as one of the more professional divisions of the police force.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, my instructing attorney says, and he referred me to that previously, that it is possible that you possibly do not have the correct application, Mr Taylor&#039;s correct application in front of you.  An improved application was handed in at a certain stage.  Could I ask - I don&#039;t want to cause delay but the one which in my bundle - is the address in page 1 is 13 Bencraig, Burtchell Avenue, Francis Evert Park?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, there is an improved application available.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>My attorney tells me that it has been handed in at your offices in Cape Town but for some or other reason the old application is in this bundle.  I don&#039;t know how you want me to approach this.  I would suggest that when we have a short adjournment at 3 o&#039;clock my attorney will provide you with the newer application.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	There are no drastic differences.  I don&#039;t know what my learned friend&#039;s position is.  He might be in the same position.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible] supplied by the Commission Mr Chairman, judging by the description it is the old one.  It&#039;s dated the 13th of December &#039;96.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, we will have a look at these documents.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	You became aware of politics and also in the spirit of the time you heard lectures, you listened to political statements and the old story of the red bear and the black threat.  You&#039;ve heard about that and you had to live with that.  Did you believe that?  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I believed it at that stage.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>You used a qualification during that time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Definitely.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Do you mean by that that at present you feel differently?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Tell the Commission more about that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;ve reached the stage where I will go so far that the same work that I&#039;ve done for the previous government I will do for this government.  In other words intelligence gathering and prevention of crime.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>With the same degree of reality?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Taylor, if we can go on.  Your personal review, the 1st paragraph, you just give your background: where you come from, how you grew up, where  you grew up.  And in the 2nd paragraph you refer to the fact why you joined the police: you could not study any further, what you believed in, what your duties as a policeman were during those days - in the 2nd paragraph etc., is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>At the top of page 3 you mention what you really believed in, and you say</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;The North Western democratic style of life which I became aware of and was threatened by the ANC/SACP alliance because they wanted to overthrow the government with violence&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>If at this stage we can say this application is based on the fact that the deceased died as it was also described in the law during the conflicts of the past.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, who is giving this evidence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>I&#039;m not giving this evidence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Can we just hear the question Mr Booyens, I didn&#039;t hear you Mr Bizos.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Who is giving this evidence Mr Chairman?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Well Mr Bizos, it&#039;s been going on like this for the last two witnesses but I agree with you that it shouldn&#039;t be so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairman.  Perhaps our learned friend will come back to the traditional way in which evidence is led.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Booyens, can we get it by question and answer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Certainly Mr Chairman.  The reason is, I&#039;ve consulted with the witness, the only reason is what I&#039;m giving to him here is a cue.  There is a very long answer that he is going to give now.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Let me put it this way.  What did you understand by revolutionary onslaught?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, I attended many lectures during security training courses where this revolutionary onslaught was explained.  I read about it and I&#039;ve made a summary of my own approach to this onslaught.  The end result was that I distinguished four dimensions of this onslaught, number one was terrorism, number two was guerrilla warfare.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	There is a distinction between these two and if it&#039;s necessary I will try to explain that.  And number three is organisation, it&#039;s perhaps not the correct word but I have used the word organisation.  And the organisational process entailed or it was 80% of revolutionary onslaught and then the armed part formed the rest of the 20%.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	In this organisation process there were three steps.  The first step was to politicise the society to make use of grievances of the day, especially socio-economic grievances.  There were also emotional grievances, for example the burials of victims and only then - and it was impossible to involve somebody in an organisation if he was not politicised, then they started with organisation and people would be bound together by one organisation.   </text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	And only then do I come to mobilisations.  That is the manifestation we saw on grassroots level and those were the marches etc.  The fourth dimension is conventional warfare.  This for example happened in South West Africa.  This whole process, in other words this revolutionary onslaught process could end in one or two things:  a full scale war or negotiations.  In our case it fortunately resulted in negotiations.  This is just in short.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I just want to add while I&#039;m talking about the revolutionary onslaught, the Eastern Cape according to me - to put it in words I will never forget like Mr Jack said: &quot; The Eastern Cape was the generator of the revolution&quot;.   The impression I got in the security branch and in the overview we received from headquarters was that it was very clear that the Eastern Cape was a flashpoint.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>That broad background, can you or where would you say Mr Goniwe and the other deceased, regarding their actions, where did they fit into that background?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>They fitted into the organisational context regarding organisation, mobilisation and also the further importance of their role in this whole revolutionary onslaught was the fact that under the revolutionaries emphasis was placed on the organisation of rural areas.  They fitted into this pattern definitely.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>What were your functions in the security branch in the Eastern Cape in 1985?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, I basically performed five functions.  I want to give them to you in the order of importance.  In the first place evaluation and interpretation of information on a regional level.  In other words the processing of information coming from the branches in the region.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Secondly, I did active field work, that means physically gathering information.  I handled many informers right across the region, not only in Port Elizabeth, although Port Elizabeth was my area of primary importance.  And then also I was involved in bombs and also the security of very important persons.  That was more or less my functions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Were you also involved in the Joint Management System?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>In which capacity?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I served in the mini Joint Management System.  I was involved in the &quot;gik&quot; part of that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="61">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Tell us what is a mini Joint Management System, what happened there?  And you say it was in the joint Information Committee.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="62">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="63">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="64">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="65">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>The chairman was Colonel Wolmerans of the Defence Force at that time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="66">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>And more specifically this mini JMS, for which area was that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="67">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That was for the whole - all the black townships in Port Elizabeth.  I just want to say at this stage that it was presented as the model JMS in South Africa insofar that at certain incidents President P.W. Botha and Magnus Malan personally visited this Joint Management System because we were involved or busy with the so-called red plan.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="68">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Without going into particulars, what was the mini JMS involved in?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="69">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>They paid attention to methods to normalise the black townships in Port Elizabeth, to stabilise and normalise them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="70">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>You said on a daily basis you were involved in the Joint Information Centre?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="71">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Chairman.  At this stage I want to tell you that it was a bit of an irritation for me at that stage because of the volume of work I had to do and it was a tremendous volume of work which come through my office.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="72">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	It was an irritation to co-operate with the Defence Force on a daily basis regarding information. </text>
		</line>
		<line number="73">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>You say with the Defence Force?  Who served on the Joint Information Centre, which departments served on this JIC?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="74">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Only Defence Force and the security branch were represented, that means the military intelligence component of the Defence Force.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="75">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>What did you do there and what were you supposed to be doing there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="76">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="77">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	And I want to say today that I provided the minimum information to JIC at that time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="78">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>What do you mean, you provided JIC with the minimum of information?  Was there more information available to you or what was the position?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="79">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Definitely yes.  There was a lot of pressure exerted on me especially from Wolmerans to provide more detailed information.  I can tell you for example what happened.  If I would provide the JIC with information, the Defence Force would report this information to their headquarters and then their headquarters would approach the security headquarters and make enquiries and then security head office would send the same information back to me to comment on.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="80">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	In the second place I was not willing to give them an indication where my informers were because some of my informers worked in very small groups and I did not want to take the risk to provide the information to somebody I did not trust.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="81">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>You refer to Wolmerans, he was the Chairman of the mini JMS?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="82">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="83">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Was there a relationship of trust between you and the Defence Force?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="84">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Definitely not.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="85">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>And the information you held back, why did you do that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="86">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="87">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="88">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="89">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Is it correct that you, approximately two to three weeks before the 27th of July, you received instructions from Captain van Zyl?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="90">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="91">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>That was in other words the week of the 1st to 8th of July.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="92">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That was more or less before that date, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="93">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>And what was the nature of this instruction?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="94">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="95">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Booyens, was the name Mr Kondile used here because it was interpreted?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="96">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>No, it was Mr Goniwe.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="97">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="98">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, it was Goniwe.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="99">
			<speaker>INTERPRETER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="100">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Just for clarity: &quot;He instructed me&quot; what?  He instructed me?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="101">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Maybe we can repeat that bit of evidence please.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="102">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>He told me that the elimination of Goniwe was being considered.  He instructed me to monitor more intensively the activities of Goniwe and his associates and he also told me that I had to participate in that elimination.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="103">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>You are referring to Mr Goniwe and his associates.  During this first discussion of you and van Zyl, was there an idea who these associates were?  Did you know who they were?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="104">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>We had a got idea who they were.  We were - they were known to us.  Various names were mentioned and during the next three weeks various names were discussed, more names than the four.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="105">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>You said that various names were mentioned.  I think this is a very big point of dispute.  Please tell us in your own words, you said during this first discussion names were mentioned.  Were the two of you alone or were there more people?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="106">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>We were alone</text>
		</line>
		<line number="107">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Various names were mentioned here.  We leave Mr Goniwe aside, we know his name was mentioned.  Which other names?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="108">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="109">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>About how many names in total were mentioned?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="110">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="111">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>These names were mentioned, were the names mentioned by you, by van Zyl or both of you?  How did it happen that these names were mentioned?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="112">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>During our discussion and exchanging of information and with the knowledge of the suspects it was a ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="113">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>The discussion came from both sides.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="114">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="115">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Can you tell the Commission today who mentioned which names?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="116">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="117">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>After these names had been mentioned, what happened then?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="118">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Then we started to monitor the activities of Mr Goniwe and his associates.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="119">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Who were the: &quot;We&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="120">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="121">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Were you all by yourself?  From the side of the security police, were you yourself involved in this intelligence gathering or other policemen as well?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="122">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="123">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Were you tasked by Captain van Zyl to be involved in this/</text>
		</line>
		<line number="124">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, Sergeant Lotz was also tasked.  After I had left van Zyl and after van Zyl told me that Lotz would also be part of this operation and then I contacted Lotz regarding this operation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="125">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Were you a Lieutenant at that stage?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="126">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="127">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="128">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>It took place over three weeks more or less.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="129">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What was the purpose of the monitoring?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="130">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, this entailed that we had to establish his movements, the pattern of his movements as to what we could expect, where he would go to on a basis.  And also in what combination he and his so-called lieutenants would work.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="131">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Did you gather information regarding these people mentioned?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="132">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, yes.  I just want to say that I did not gather this intelligence just over those three weeks.  Mr Goniwe and some of these people were well-known to me before this time but my information I geared more specifically towards them.  I had a lot of information before the time and I was well aware of their activities.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="133">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="134">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="135">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I think Cradock was such a model, presented as a model that people from Utenhage and Grahamstown, their chairmen were invited to Kradora meetings there.  Later on he served on an umbrella organisation which was established to become an over encompassing body for the civics in the region.  He served on this umbrella organisation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="136">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="137">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That was the jargon of the time.  It was community organisations like Kadora, Pebco etc.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="138">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="139">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="140">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Cradock was divided into four blocks and these blocks later on were sub-divided and they became more - functioned more effectively.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="141">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="142">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>In other words in initial stages the township was divided into four blocks.  Later on there became a re-organisation, a subdivision of these blocks, in other words to manage them more effectively.  This was the same tendencies we saw in other regions like Grahamstown, Port Elizabeth etc., and even in his own rural area.  That was his forte the rural areas, Steynsburg, Hoffmeyer, Middelburg, Graaff Reinet, Hanover, Bedford, Adelaide.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="143">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="144">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>The first step in the whole process was that this township had to be divided into various areas.  There were area committees established there and this was followed by the establishment of self-defence units and this was followed by the introduction of what we call the: &quot;Kangaroo Courts&quot; in those areas.  In a nutshell this is what it was about.  We were not in the security police so tell us what is a self-defence unit and what is a Kangaroo Court.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="145">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="146">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="147">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Was there anything else about the activities of Mr Goniwe?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="148">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes.   He mainly focused on school boycotts, neutralisation of the then black civic members and the replacement of alternative structures, rent boycotts.  At times -the purpose of the rent boycotts, he believed that the money should rather go to the various committees and the community.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="149">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="150">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>It fitted in well with the revolutionary onslaught, in other words often it was said then - and formed part of the revolutionary onslaught, they successfully took the hearts and the minds of the people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="151">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Anything else that you can remember about Mr Goniwe?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="152">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="153">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Calata?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="154">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, the two of them were - you could not ...[indistinct] the two, they were together most of the time.  Mr Calata later, before Cradora had an executive both of them managed Cradora, that was the structure that managed Cradora.  Further, he was always with Mr Goniwe.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="155">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Anything else you want to add except for the general statement that he was with Mr Goniwe?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="156">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Initially Mr Calata was the chairperson of Cradoya.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="157">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Cradock Youth Organisation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="158">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="159">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>And Mr Mkhonto?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="160">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mkhonto was the chairperson after Mr Calata of Cradora.  He focused on scholars and the youth and he often came to Port Elizabeth to speak to COSAS members concerning the organisation of school boycotts.   I remember often he would get a speaker at the meetings, amongst other Hanover.  Why I remember Hanover, at that time there was a lot of violence in that area.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="161">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mhlawuli?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="162">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mhlawuli came to my attention during visits to Port Elizabeth where he linked with UDF members.  He often had contact with Mr Goniwe.  He visited Port Elizabeth on more than one occasion and my information was that Mr Goniwe was not satisfied with the silence from South Western districts and he got Mr Mhlawuli to implement his plan in the South Western districts.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="163">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="164">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>I think it brief it could be relevant, you mentioned two others names, I think the one was Madora Jacobs.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="165">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Madora Jacobs was at that time a teacher where Mr Goniwe taught and he took the lead in respect of the school boycotts from the side of the students.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="166">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	And Mr Makahula was active with others members at Cradora and at certain instances he attended meetings and he addressed meetings.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="167">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>I assume you do not want to make known the identity of these informers?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="168">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="169">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>This information that was available at the time, was there information that their identities could be become known at the time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="170">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>We knew - it was something that we knew at the time, I just wanted to concentrate on movement of Mr Goniwe and these people.  I activated my informers and I controlled them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="171">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="172">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="173">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Calata?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="174">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="175">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mkhonto?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="176">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="177">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mhlawuli?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="178">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mhlawuli did not have a file with us.  The only documentation, except for what my self and Captain van Zyl had with us in - with discussions during those three weeks that we had with us.  He had an index in the regional office.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="179">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>You have to explain to us how the index cards work.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="180">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="181">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="182">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="183">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="184">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="185">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>What happened usually was that other people come to our attention for the first time and we opened an index card on them and a short memorandum is kept is he should come to the attention of the region again in the future.  nucleus notes were kept just to say whether he for instance visited P.E. and liaised with such and such a person.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="186">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>At which stage would a file be opened for this person?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="187">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="188">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="189">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="190">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	The subject is on such and such a date, died and headquarters would decide on this and then they would refer to their files.  And in a matter of a month or six weeks they would come back to us and such and such a reference file.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="191">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Who would give this instruction that such and such a letter be written?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="192">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, this was standard procedure.  In other words the Port Elizabeth area or the Cradock area would report the death to Port Elizabeth first and then Port Elizabeth would channel to headquarters and then receive the instruction.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="193">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>I think one of the Commissioners asked if the file would have gone through here to see if there was any important information there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="194">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="195">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>What is the position with regard to, I assume security headquarters or rather provincial branch?  Was there a lot of documentation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="196">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, you can assume for yourself if you look at the activities of that time and how many persons were involved.  At one stage they had two offices neighbouring each other that they broke through to make more space for more filing cabinets.  I just want to add something more.  Older files or less important files were moved to a safe that was on the 8th floor because of the lack of space.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="197">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>What happened eventually to these files of yours?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="198">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="199">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Can you remember how many files were taken away from here?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="200">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="201">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>That was taken to Pretoria to destroy?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="202">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="203">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="204">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>It was during the same period.  I know there was concern amongst security branch members of the reporters, the informers because it was a sensitive issue to us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="205">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="206">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="207">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>ON RESUMPTION</text>
		</line>
		<line number="208">
			<speaker>ERIC TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>(s.u.o.)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="209">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Your information sources, what was the information, what was the factual situation at grassroots level in the Eastern Cape rural areas, specifically referring to the activities ascribed to Mr Goniwe and the other three persons?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="210">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="211">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>And you speak of areas, can you give us more detail?  Which places were these?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="212">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="213">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>My learned friend referred much to meetings in higher circles and discussions at Cradock surrounding this whole question of the re-appointment of Mr Goniwe as a teacher.  Did you know of this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="214">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Of the re-appoint?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="215">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="216">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I knew of the re-appointment for quite some time before this operation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="217">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Did you consider this as a factor in your evaluation of their activities?  Did this play a role in the activities?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="218">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="219">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Why not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="220">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="221">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>It was mentioned to General van Rensburg that - was it considered that alternatives like laying a charge or detaining him, in your opinion would this have played a role?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="222">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="223">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>I just want to mention something else here.  It was an accepted practice that these people even in detention, got messages out to the outside.  There was reference made during cross-examination between the trust amongst your members, can you elaborate on this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="224">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="225">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>It was mentioned that black members of the security branch and how they were threatened and how to protect them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="226">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I was actively involved with the decisions, the safekeeping of these members and I know at one instance extinguishers were taken in one evening, I cannot remember the specific date but extinguishers were given to black officials because members were attacked regularly.  And we felt that we at the security branch needed to patrol around the areas surrounding our colleagues homes because they were part of this family.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="227">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	We felt strongly about this and I would like to mention that some our black members had to move out of their areas, everybody knows him  Butler Tongata and we housed some of our members at New Brighton.  It was a high priority for us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="228">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>You refer to New Brighton police station, at that time did you come to the New Brighton police station?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="229">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, not often.  I would say on a daily basis.  This was our meeting place when we went out at night to the black areas and we rendezvous at New Brighton police station.  At that time I visited the police station on a daily basis.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="230">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>What control for admittance was there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="231">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>There were guards at the gate.  I never noticed it because they knew me quite well because we went there very often.  It did not come to my attention all that much.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="232">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Were you body - were you searched when you entered or exited?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="233">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, we met there daily so it was not necessary.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="234">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>So you came freely?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="235">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  If they saw you once or twice then they knew you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="236">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="237">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="238">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="239" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;According to my knowledge up to the 27th of June&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="240">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="241">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="242">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	On the 27th of June certain information came to your knowledge, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="243">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="244">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>What was the nature of this information?  When did you get it and what happened then?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="245">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="246">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>What other information, if any, came to your attention?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="247">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="248">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>You speak of the operation, was it already discussed how the operation would go and what would it look like?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="249">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="250">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>We know already that these persons were not killed with firearms.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="251">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>This was known because a service firearm could be traced too easily and the fact that the reason for this was to not point a finger at us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="252">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>In other words to leave a false trail?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="253">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="254">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>What happened next that day?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="255">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="256">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>This was yourself and him and was there someone else?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="257">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Sergeant Lotz was there too.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="258">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Was there at that stage anyone else?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="259">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="260">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Much was made of the involvement of Mr Winter in the operation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="261">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="262">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Do you know why he was never formally informed of the prospect of this operation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="263">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="264">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>When Captain van Zyl gave the initial instruction to become involved, did you ask from where this instruction came or was it about authorisation, did he tell you anything?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="265">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, it was never told to me who had authorised this but I accepted that it had been cleared.  I knew Captain van Zyl, he would not undertake such an operation lightly and on his own initiative.  It had to do once again with the trust we had.  I just accepted that he had received authorisation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="266">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS:</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="267">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="268">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I think Mr Booyens, use your discretion and ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="269">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="270">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And Mr Bizos, is you feel aggrieved or your - please object.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="271">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>The three of you then went to Olifants Pass.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="272">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>We left in two motor cars, Lotz was with me in my vehicle and Captain van Zyl was in his vehicle.  We left and went to a certain point in the Olifantskop Pass where we stopped.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="273">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR BOOYENS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="274" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;after a while the motor car passed, we followed it&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="275">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="276">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Certainly, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="277">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>This revised document is placed in front of you ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="278">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Shall we give this an exhibit number?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="279">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="280">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="281">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>I think the main difference is that - you would notice Mr Chairman that at page 7 in the record there is</text>
		</line>
		<line number="282" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Politieke Motiveering:  Sal later verskaf word&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="283">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="284">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="285">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I think we just slot it into this bundle then.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="286">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, if I may suggest that Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="287">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="288">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>We left to Olifantskop Pass where we found or looked for a suitable place to park the vehicles.  There was a kind of picnic spot along the road where we could park the vehicles that they could not be seen from the road.  In the meanwhile this place had changed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="289">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="290">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="291">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Just after the pass on the way to Middelton, Cradock, the first time where there was a straight road where there were no other vehicles in sight I used a blue light on my vehicle and I forced them to stop.  I stopped in front and van Zyl behind his vehicle.  We walked towards this vehicle.  Captain van Zyl came to the vehicle first.  It was clear that he was satisfied with the identification of these people.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="292">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I can remember in which - I can remember distinctly because at some or other time during this proceeding it was referred to that Mr Mhlawuli was driving the car.  He did not drive the car, it was clear to me that he was sitting at the back of the car on the rear seat.  Mr Mhlawuli was a very big person and it was uncomfortable for him to get out of the vehicle.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="293">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="294">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="295">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>How far is that from Port Elizabeth?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="296">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="297">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You were left with the four of them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="298">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="299">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>While the other ...[inaudible]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="300">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="301">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Just take a guess.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="302">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="303">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="304">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Initially I was not sure which one was first or second but I cleared that up with Mr MacAdam.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="305">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>I think your Mr MacAdam from the Truth Commission.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="306">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="307">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	During the photo identification and the material made available during the post mortem I could determine that Mr Goniwe was the first person taken by Lotz from the vehicle.  I went with Lotz together with some of the black members.  I saw Lotz hitting the person from behind with an iron object.  The person fell to the ground and then the black members stabbed him with knives.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="308">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I can remember at that time I was standing at the feet of the deceased.  I returned to the vehicle and took Mr Calata from the vehicle.  I took ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="309">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>What was this iron object?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="310">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="311">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Yes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="312">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="313">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Then, when he was ready on the scene where Mr Mhlawuli was he would just say one word over the radio and I would then set these bodies alight.  That was what I did and I set both these bodies alight.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="314">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Did you leave then?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="315">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>We left the scene.  I dropped Sergeant Lotz in Algoa Park, I went home.  I can remember at home I just had the opportunity to shower, dress and I returned back to my office at the security branch.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="316">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="317">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="318">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>This even, did that bother you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="319">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Do you mean afterwards?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="320">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="321">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Definitely yes Mr Chairman, it bothered me tremendously.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="322">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="323">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="324">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="325">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="326">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="327">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	The meeting then dispersed and Khundu spoke to the families.  He later came back and Mr Khundu told me that the families felt that I understand my situation but that this whole meeting and the purpose of the meeting would not be fulfilled if at that stage they could obtain full details about the death of these people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="328">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Impulsively I decided that I was going to do that.  I did that on one condition, namely that I would not mention any of the names of the colleagues who were involved.  They understood that because I said I was just talking for myself, I was not going to implicate my colleagues.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="329">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Minutes were kept of this meeting by June Crighton of the Human Rights Violation Committee of the TRC, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="330">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="331">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>And did you in the meanwhile, did you see the minutes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="332">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="333">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>I have given my learned friend a copy or I was told he was given a copy of this.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="334">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	With a few small exceptions ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="335">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Have you got a copy Bizos?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="336">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>No Mr Chairman, my learned friend was given a copy of Friday not yesterday.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="337">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="338">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="339">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Are these the minutes, is this a copy of the minutes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="340">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="341">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="342">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Was there initially, before you started, was there initially an agreement between the various parties about the fact that this matter should not be published in the press?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="343">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>...[indistinct] to be an exhibit?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="344">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>DD.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="345">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="346">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>DD, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="347">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>We may get into trouble later on in the alphabet.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="348">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Yes Mr Chairman, I get your point.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="349">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Was there initially an agreement that nobody would go to the press with this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="350">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="351">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>If you can just look at these minutes.  The process as explained, is it correct the initial stages or what resulted in this, the first page: &quot;Process&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="352">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="353">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="354">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>A few of the things I can remember is for example Miss Crighton at one stage refers to &quot;shot&quot;, I think at two places she refers to &quot;shot&quot;.  She made a mistake.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="355">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="356" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;In answer to the question: who did you kill?, he</text>
		</line>
		<line number="357">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>that refers to you</text>
		</line>
		<line number="358" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;replied: I must say that because I was there, I was involved, therefore guilty.  I had the same question from Chris MacAdam but I cannot remember which one I shot&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="359">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That &quot;shot&quot; is not correct.  The word which should be there is &quot;killed&quot; and the same in the next paragraph with the word &quot;shot&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="360">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>And</text>
		</line>
		<line number="361" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;He was asked which one he shot&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="362">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>this you also say.  There he says &quot;killed&quot;, you did not use a firearm.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="363">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="364">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Regarding the rest of these minutes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="365">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="366">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="367">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="368">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="369">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	This is a newspaper report with the heading:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="370" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Revealed how Goniwe was killed&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="371">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>written by Guy Oliver, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="372">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="373">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="374">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>The third paragraph the last part</text>
		</line>
		<line number="375" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;And there were three separate apartheid death squads, one from South African Defence Force Military Intelligence and two from the Police Security Branches in Port Elizabeth and Cradock&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="376">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>That was never said during that meeting Mr Chairman.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="377">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	And then again, on the right-hand side.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="378">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>The right-hand column.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="379">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>The right-hand column, the fourth paragraph</text>
		</line>
		<line number="380" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Taylor told relatives of the victims at a gathering in the vestry of the Kabiga Park Church, that separate apartheid death squads were given the task of eliminating the activists&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="381">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>That is not correct Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="382">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	And the next paragraph:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="383" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Assassins from Cradock Special Branch, then headed by Eric Winter MI were also on their trail and there had been several attempts on the lives of Calata and Goniwe in the months before their deaths&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="384">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	That was also not said during that meeting.  At this stage I just want to tell you, when this newspaper report was brought under my attention I did contact Winter telephonically and told him because the chances were good that he could have seen the report.  I said he should not worry about this report because I did not say that because I knew Winter very well.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="385">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Booyens, when you get to a convenient stage, I want to adjourn a bit earlier today.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="386">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>This may be a convenient stage Mr Chairman.  Mr Chairman, perhaps just one aspect, can we just finish the newspaper report.  I think there are one or two extra references and then we are through with that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="387">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Then on the second photocopied page.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="388">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="389">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="390">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Might this then be a convenient stage Mr Chairman?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="391">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="392">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>