<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY HEARINGS</type>
	<startdate>1998-03-03</startdate>
	<location>PORT ELIZABETH</location>
	<day>7</day>
								<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=54811&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/pe/cradock7.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="1365">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>ERIC TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>(s.u.o.)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS CONTINUES WITH EXAMINATION</speaker>
			<text>(cont)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Taylor, yesterday you referred to the fact that you retired from the police force, what was the reason?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Because of post-traumatic stress.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>How do you personally find the effect of this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>My physician has warned me that because of the medication I would have problems with my memory and amongst others a lower level of concentration.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Just briefly, yesterday you referred to your experiences as a police officer.  Your experience on court, in other words as a witness, can you elaborate on this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Never testified in court?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I speak of inferior cases, possession of dagga and that type of situation, types of misdemeanours.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>And that one year was in 19?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>As a security police officer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, Captain van Zyl was the first one to the vehicle and he confirmed the identification of the persons.  I recognised some of the persons because I have seen some photographs of them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Can you remember who you recognised?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Definitely Mr Goniwe and Mr Mhlawuli from his photograph and a description I had of him, he was a rather large person.  In discussions later on they mentioned them by name and when we sat there the four persons sat alone with me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Are you saying Mr Taylor, that there was nobody there to point out and say: &quot;This is Mr Mhlawuli&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Well Mr Chairperson, on the grounds of the photographs and the descriptions that we had, this was confirmation and I accepted this, I was satisfied that these were the four persons.  It was confirmed to me that those four persons would be in that vehicle.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Perhaps you misunderstand my question.  ...[indistinct] the photos and other identifying mechanisms all I want to know is, was anybody present who was able to say: &quot;I know Mhlawuli personally, this is him&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, we worked according to the photos that we had.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	According to you personally Mr Taylor, have you personally seen any of the four persons previously?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Not one of them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Earlier on you asked a question - you answered the question from the Chairperson, you said that you received information of the - about the four.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	From two sources I received information that these four persons would be in the vehicle.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>If you speak about these four persons, who is this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I speak about the four deceased persons.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>When you were waiting for the car did you expect certain people in this car?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>In accordance with the information that we had, and this was evaluated, we knew who to expect in the car.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>You need to understand that these informers were already handled, these tasks were just additional tasks which they had.  They had to focus specifically on the activities of Mr Goniwe and his cohorts.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>And because of this, did any information come through?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Information came through.  We were focused on movements.  The normal flow of information continued on my desk, I just gave more intensive attention to these four persons.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Definitely so Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Why?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Let me ask you this, are you talking from a moral point of view or a legal point of view?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>If you were asked to identify them would not be willing to answer those questions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text>Mr Taylor, was there any information in relation to Mr Mhlawuli that you received via informers?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text>What type of information?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text>And the time that you refer to now, was this two to three weeks between the instruction that you received and the incident itself?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text>To your attention?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he came to my attention.  I expressed myself incorrectly now, he came under my attention Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text>So you personally had knowledge of Mr Mhlawuli and his alleged activities long before this incident?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="61">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text>And definitely before the discussion that you had with Mr van Zyl?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="62">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="63">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text>Was Mr Mhlawuli known to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="64">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="65">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text>Did SWD have a file on Mr Mhlawuli?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="66">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="67">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text>You did not try to find out?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="68">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="69">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text>It seems like - to this effect from one of the exhibits that we have.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="70">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="71">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text>Just to come back to the point, are you in the position that you feel that you need to protect the identity of these informers in respect of Mr Mhlawuli?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="72">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="73">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="74">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Taylor, when you made this application - or shall I put it in another manner, when you considered this application did you speak about this to your fellow applicants?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="75">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  Can I just explain what happened?  I just need to remember what time this was.  I think it was in November 1996 or around there, General van der Merwe sent circulars to other regions where he invited all ex-security members, where a proposal would be put about the whole reconciliation process and specifically the amnesty process and this was done by representatives of the Department of Justice.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="76">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I just want to add that General van der Merwe was respected because he was previously the commander of the security branch.  He requested us that if we were involved in any operations in the past we need to consider seriously involving ourselves in the process, in this reconciliation process.  And an integral part of this is the exposure of undercover activities, this was one of the motivations.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="77">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I cannot name any specific dates but we came in contact with each other and we decided that we need to apply for amnesty and every person, it was individual choice whether he would participate in this process.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="78">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Now, the reasons for your application can be as well attributed to the part played by informers, not so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="79">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="80">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="81">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, these informers did not know what happened to the information that we received from them.  I did not see the need to bother them with this.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="82">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Well, on the day of the killings you were informed on two occasions that you can expect a particular combination of these trouble makers in a particular vehicle, not so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="83">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="84">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="85">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairperson.  I want to state clearly that it was a daily activity to give tasks to informers about whatever subjects, it was not out of the norm to liaise with them daily, the fact that it had to look like an AZAPO attack.  I did not underestimate their ability or their intelligence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="86">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Maybe some of them drew their inferences to this fact.  I think unfortunately there might be some of them, in spite of them being informers they shocked, must have been very shocked to know that I was involved in this incident.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="87">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, proceed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="88">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="89">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Not with the administration thereof.  I wish to explain how I collected files and what I did with them.  All the files S13/436, and I would later report in my own handwriting, it would go to Major du Plessis.  If he needed to know more he would refer back to me and then it was sent for typing.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="90">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	After that I had nothing to do with the report anymore.  The person who did they typing the addressing and the sending of it to headquarters.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="91">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>This is with a formal file.  Now this index card, how did this work?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="92">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Index cards were used in general.  When another person from another region came to our attention, the first field worker who picked this up would open an index card.  There would be short entry on this index card, it would take one or two forms or  one person could write on index card a date and then would say COP, whatever number / whatever number.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="93">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Secondly he would write subject and would say: a certain date:  made contact with an activist.  There were two types of index cards that we had.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="94">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>And that which Captain van Zyl mentioned, the informal file?  What was that exactly?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="95">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="96">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>And this operational file, would this receive a number?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="97">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="98">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="99">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="100">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="101">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="102">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I understand that but I want to come back to Mr Mhlawuli.  A person - it seems that from the end of 1984 you had information about it, you had informers who reported about Mr Mhlawuli.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="103">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="104">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="105">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="106">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="107">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, I would not have told Oudtshoorn we would want to take action.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="108">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="109">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>If I did this before this three weeks it would have been normal but if I did it within these three weeks it would have been suspect and they would not see that because I contacted them about Mr Mhlawuli so close to this incident, it would have been suspect.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="110">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="111">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="112">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text>Why did you have all these systems, index cards, operational, information files?  Why did you just not keep one file, it would have been so simple?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="113">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="114">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="115">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="116">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, I understand your problem.  This also causes a problem for us.  I am convinced however, that if Oudtshoorn did not have a file on Mr Mhlawuli there was a omission.  At certain instances I specifically used his name in my reports and I would have sent them a copy of this letter.  If they did not have a file I would have expected them to come back to me and ask for information about him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="117">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text>Perhaps later more material will become available.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="118">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I think so Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="119">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="120">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>It says in the third paragraph</text>
		</line>
		<line number="121" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="122">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>The context of this statement, about what was that? - It was during this inquiry.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="123">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>The context was, if I draw the correct inference, it had to do with the inquiry into the death of these four people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="124">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>And who is Sparrow, Ford and Stwele?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="125">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Ford Calata, Sparrow Mkhonto and it must be Stwele Mhlawuli.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="126">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>I think the word: &quot;operational file&quot; creates certain perceptions regarding one certain matter, you have to explain.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="127">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="128">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>In other words the phrase: &quot;operational file&quot; would not be used in the official police jargon of that time when matters were discussed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="129">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>This is a term which referred to JOS activities.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="130">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="131">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="132">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Taylor, when you held discussions with these people, where from the depth of your heart came the idea to talk to them?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="133">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible] he told the witness where it came from Mr Chairman but anyway we will have to see.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="134">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Maybe he was talking about the different ventricles.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="135">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="136">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="137">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="138">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text>Were you aware of the inquest?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="139">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I read about that in the newspaper Mr Chairman.  I never had any in-depth knowledge.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="140">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text>Why did you not assist the Attorney General or the court with that inquest to tell them that you felt terrible over this whole incident, but as a policeman you only performed your duty because you had received an instruction and that was what happened.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="141">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, in the first place I was not approached.  I understand what you mean, why did I not go voluntarily.  The possibility that I would still be charged there - at that stage I had not experienced this transformation which took place later on when I changed my whole view of the politics and also later on the purpose and functioning of the TRC.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="142">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I want to tell you that at a certain stag, because of ignorance I was careful of the whole process or hesitant.  After I read documents what this was all about, what the functioning was, what the purpose was and I agreed with that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="143">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text>Did you not consult anybody when this inquest was going on, like a minister, a reverend of somebody, that &quot;This is troubling me, I want to do something about that&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="144">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, I did not do that, only a later stage I considered that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="145">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="146">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>At the stage when the inquest was on were you still a member of the police?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="147">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="148">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="149">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Please repeat your question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="150">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="151">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="152">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="153">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Only Gerhard Lotz was still stationed here.  Captain van Zyl travelled a great deal, I did not have a lot of contact with him and Colonel du Plessis was at that time stationed in Pretoria so  it was only me and Lotz in Port Elizabeth - of the Northern Transvaal.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="154">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="155">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="156">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="157">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Bizos, would you have any objection to them requesting an adjournment to consult?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="158">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>I think the Committee is entitled to be told what is the technical problem Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="159">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="160">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="161">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Would you have any objection if they were able to consult, still consult with the witness before cross-examination?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="162">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="163">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But not in this fashion?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="164">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>But not in this fashion.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="165">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="166">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Booyens, you heard the complain?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="167">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="168">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  What seems to be the problem with the minutes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="169">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>For example on page four ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="170">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, what about page four?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="171">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="172">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Would you want to adjourn to do that first?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="173">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="174">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Well, I must point out I would have expected that exercise to have been completed last night already.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="175">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="176">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Taylor, have you read that document?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="177">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I glanced through this, I did not read it in detail.  Yesterday I told you that in essence this in an accurate representation of that meeting with just here and there a difference in emphasis which is not correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="178">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="179">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>On page four, what is it that you want to correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="180">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible]  Mr Chairman, I object to the witness having whispers with his counsel whilst the court is in session.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="181">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="182">
			<speaker>INTERPRETER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="183">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="184">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Then he should have said that to me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="185">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="186">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>I accept that Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="187">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="188">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="189">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="190">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>At least in public.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="191">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  No, but the witness was speaking to me Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="192">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="193">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="194">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="195">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Let us go through the whole document.  Page 1, are you finished with page 1?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="196">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="197">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Is there anything you want to correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="198">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No thank you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="199">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Page 2?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="200">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Nothing on page 2.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="201">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Page 3?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="202">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="203">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="204">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="205">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Page 5?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="206">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Nothing Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="207">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="208">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="209">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Page 7?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="210">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Nothing on page 7.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="211">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Page 8?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="212">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="213">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Page 9?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="214">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Nothing Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="215">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So there are no problems with Exhibit DD.  Yes Mr Booyens?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="216">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, that concludes my evidence as far as this witness is concerned.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="217">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR BOOYENS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="218">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Taylor, please page to page 8 of your application.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="219">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I have it in front of me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="220">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Question 11(a) and (b).</text>
		</line>
		<line number="221">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Are you referring to page 8?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="222">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, page 8 of the record.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="223">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="224">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>11(a), the question is</text>
		</line>
		<line number="225" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Is the deed or deeds, omissions, offence or offences executed in the execution of an instruction of or on behalf half or with the approval of the relevant organisation, institution, body, liberation movement, government department or security force&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="226">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>and your answer there is:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="227" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Yes&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="228">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="229">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>(b) says</text>
		</line>
		<line number="230" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;If yes, give particulars with reference to such an instruction or approval and the date of that and if known the name and address of the person or persons who gave such an instruction or approval&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="231">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="232">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And your original answer is</text>
		</line>
		<line number="233" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Will be provided at a later stage&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="234">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>When you answered question 11(a) you certainly knew what the answer to (b) was, why did you complete it like this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="235">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="236">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>When you signed this application, did you read through all of this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="237">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I read through this very quickly, everything went very quickly at that stage.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="238">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Can you give a reason why this happened?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="239">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="240">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Did you not complete this?  Whose handwriting is this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="241">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="242">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="243">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="244">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="245">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Before you completed this form did you tell your attorney who gave this instruction or on behalf of which organisation you did this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="246">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.  While we discussed the chronological order I definitely told him the line of command.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="247">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So your attorney knew what the answer was.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="248">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I accept that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="249">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>He understood what you said?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="250">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="251">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="252">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="253">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Six months before this incident you found out more about Mr Mhlawuli.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="254">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="255">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You got photographs, bits of information, little bits of paper and the so-called informal file.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="256">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="257">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="258">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="259">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So can we say a month or so before the incident?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="260">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I would say about three weeks before the incident I became aware because at certain instances I made notes and I wrote short memos and provided it to Captain van Zyl.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="261">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>It seems to me that here in Port Elizabeth you did not have enough information about Mr Mhlawuli and that is why there was not an official file for him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="262">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="263">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="264">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="265">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And it seems to me that in comparison to the others it was not much.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="266">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Not as detailed as the information on the other three.  But to go back to the pattern which we followed with expanding this information Mr Mhlawuli fitted into this pattern.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="267">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="268">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Amongst others, yes Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="269">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You did not know whether he would succeed with that in Oudtshoorn.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="270">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="271">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="272">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I thought he would succeed, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="273">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>How did you know that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="274">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>In the first place he had access to the same power base, namely scholars.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="275">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But that was all ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="276">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>He was influential in the community as a teacher.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="277">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>That was guess shots, not so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="278">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="279">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>It could have been that it was to come into contact, you could have contacted the security police in Oudtshoorn to find out whether Mr Mhlawuli was a leader in the Oudtshoorn area and that he would be able to establish all these structures there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="280">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>It could have been easy, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="281">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And then you would have been in a better position to decide if he posed a threat for the state.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="282">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="283">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Shortly after this incident murder and robbery branch of Port Elizabeth investigated this, did they question you?  Were you aware that people were being questioned?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="284">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No Mr Chairman, the only thing I heard about was what Captain van Zyl referred to the other day, that Engelbrecht confronted him in Pretoria regarding this.  I know at a certain stage the investigative officer visited the security branch and that was related to obtaining transcriptions of 11(a) conversations.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="285">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>At that stage why did you not come to the fore, why did you not tell them what had happened?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="286">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, if I can say it in my own words, I know it does not sound good but we undertook this operation precisely because we wanted to get away with it, our intention was to get away with it.  At that stage I would never have presented any information.  From the beginning it was my conviction that it had to be undertaken, that we would not be charged.  That we in other words were going to get away with it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="287">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="288">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Captain van Zyl, Lotz and myself decided jointly what to do and it would have been unethical and disloyal to go behind their backs and address the Attorney General.  Mr Chairman, you must remember that in 1985, how I felt then differs completely from how I feel today.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="289">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="290">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Could we have a date on which you say your transformation took place Mr Taylor?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="291">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="292">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="293">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I would say it started in 1990 Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="294">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>In the beginning of 1990.  And was it a - is that what you said?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="295">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>No, he said it started in 1990, not at the beginning of 1990.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="296">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>I beg your pardon.  During 1990?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="297">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="298">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>We can even take it that by the end of 1990 you were a completely transformed man.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="299">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="300">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>So by 1992, how far along the road of transformation had you reached?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="301">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, I just want to think when President Mandela was inaugurated, it was in 1992 I think.  Yes, it was in a advanced stage, I followed the CODESSA process and also the bilateral discussions before the CODESSA negotiations started.  At that stage I was not against these negotiations.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="302">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="303">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>To a certain degree that is correct yes, but that was the starting point of a long process.  I think that was a political conversion, it was not something which happened overnight.  Gradually I started accepting things I would never have considered in 1985.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="304">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And by 1993 when the election date had been fixed, by the end of 1993 and an interim constitution was voted on in the beginning of August 1993, were you still in the police force?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="305">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="306">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And did you agree, and if you were asked to take an oath on the interim constitution, you no doubt would have taken it because of this process of transformation that was going through you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="307">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="308">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="309">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="310">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="311">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I was already gone from the security branch and I was crime prevention.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="312">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>At which town or city?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="313">
			<speaker>UNKNOWN</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="314">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Were you at your own request from the security branch or were you transferred?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="315">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>The security branch had what we called transferral, this was because their security branch was united underneath the NBO.  The NBO and the detectives did not have the ability to operate and because of this I was transferred to the CPU.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="316">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Were you doing your police work here in Port Elizabeth during 1993?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="317">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="318">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Now the newspapers in 1993 had almost invariably an article on their front page in relation to this inquest before Mr Justice Zietsman and you never read any of those newspapers?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="319">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Not that I can recall, I had no interest in this matter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="320">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>You know ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="321">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="322">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>I would have thought that you, having been one of the killers, would have been watching this with a very keen interest just in case things turned - took a turn and you might even have been identified in some way.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="323">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chair, at that stage I was convinced that nobody had any information, that there were any witnesses or any evidence that we were involved in that elimination process.  I want to assure you that if something was known murder and robbery would have picked it up.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="324">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="325">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="326">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, this did not come to my attention, I did not follow this procedure.  At that stage I was just not interested.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="327">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="328">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="329">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="330">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="331">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chair, I cannot recall when these person died, these black members in the Motherwell matter.  I think at that stage they were already deceased.  If I remember correctly the Motherwell case was in 1989, the black members were already dead at that stage.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="332">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>So what you should have said was that of the seven witnesses, four had been killed by the security police and therefore we were not afraid that any names would come out.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="333">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="334">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="335">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="336">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="337">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Do you want to take the adjournment now?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="338">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="339">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>ON RESUMPTION</text>
		</line>
		<line number="340">
			<speaker>ERIC TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>(s.u.o.)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="341">
			<speaker>CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>(cont)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="342">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mr Taylor, the non-security policeman that was investigating these deaths was a Mr Fanie Els.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="343">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="344">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="345">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="346">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And you know that murder dockets never close and you know that he is still the investigating officer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="347">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="348">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="349">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I realise that ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="350">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="351">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="352">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Now, the question of the Motherwell incident became an issue in the Goniwe inquest before his Lordship Mr Justice Zietsman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="353">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="354">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="355">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="356">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="357">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Now you, as one of your specialities mentioned that was related to bombs.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="358">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="359">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="360">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="361">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="362">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Can I just give clarity?  Do I have to comment whether it could be a limpet mine or something else?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="363">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Well, what is the problem with your answering the question?  Did you or did you not realise that this detonator of a mini limpet mine could not have done the damage that had been done and that it required a minimum of four to five kilograms of explosive for the vehicle to be blown up in the manner in which it was?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="364">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, I understand the question better.  The detonator could not have done the damage but I wish to say this was a time detonator, would have been in any explosive, it could have been used in any explosive.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="365">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Secondly at the scene I judged it a little bit higher, I judged it for a least between 6 and 8 kilograms of explosive was used.  I do not know the source of the detonator with the short period of time I was at the scene.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="366">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="367">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I remember that there was rumour of the ANC being responsible for the explosion, I just know where the word: &quot;mini limpet mine&quot; or where it was suggested that a mini limpet mine was used because I had no doubt that the damage that was done there could not have been done by a limpet mine.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="368">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>You had another interest because three of the people that helped you to kill Goniwe and his friends died in that explosion.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="369">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I had interest in the incident, two ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="370">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And you knew that his Lordship Mr Justice Zietsman was investigating that matter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="371">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, may I please just answer the first question?   I had interest in this explosion.  I was at mini scenes, I think this was one of the most shocking scenes that I was at and I want to point out two things.  I was relatively close to two of these persons who died in this explosion.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="372">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  Therefore that must have heightened your interest in the proceedings before his Lordship Mr Justice Zietsman?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="373">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I just had interest and followed it in detail when the matter was in the Supreme Court where Mr Niewoudt and others were charged in Pretoria. and at times I attended some of these hearings.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="374">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I would just like to say that except for the question that I was at the scene of the explosion, I was never present at any of the other investigations in this matter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="375">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="376">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I cannot explain this.  At that stage I did not follow it, just later on I started following the inquest.  I cannot give you another explanation for this, I cannot tell you something that I could not substantiate.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="377">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Shortly after you attended the meeting with members of the families of the deceased, were you approached by one of your fiends on behalf of the investigating officers to go the investigating officers to help with the investigation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="378">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="379">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="380">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairman, I wish to explain.  At that stage, I do not remember the persons, this investigating officer just contacted people or came to their houses to interview them and I went to my attorney, not the attorney next to me but Mr Alwyn Griebenhout and he liaised with this investigation team because there were other allegations against me at that stage and I told him to tell them that if they want to see me they need to make an appointment.  I did not like the manner in which they were handling the people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="381">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Will you please turn to page 8 of the record with your application for amnesty dated the 13th of December 1996.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="382">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I have it in front of me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="383">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>That was two days before the cut-off date of the 15th of December, before it was extended.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="384">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="385">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="386">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="387">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Did your attorney know from you who had given you the order?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="388">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Definitely Mr Chairperson, the ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="389">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Did you ever ask him for a reason why that name was not given, was not put in your application?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="390">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson I want to honestly say that this was a formality to me, my great concern was about the contents of my statement.  This was a preliminary statement, it was relatively busy at that stage.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="391">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Well, ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="392">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Who told you that it was a preliminary statement?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="393">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Initially when I started Mr Chairperson, it was told to me that we would have the opportunity to give full details and at a later stage Mr Mac Adams of the TRC and his Investigation Team and I gave them a statement and he asked me in-depth to clear up some information.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="394">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="395">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is wrong Mr Chairperson.  Before we went - we had any of these forms or when we got to any of these sections of these forms we collectively decided that we were going to apply for amnesty.  This process started after the meeting in Pretoria with General van der Merwe.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="396">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="397">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Did you know when ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="398">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Would it interest you to know that by the time you signed your statement on the 13th of December, van Zyl had not yet made an application?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="399">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="400">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>His statement was signed in May 1997.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="401">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>If can remember Mr van Zyl did not use the same legal team and I can remember that he was abroad and he was consulted much later.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="402">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="403">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="404">
			<speaker>UNKNOWN LADY</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, Mr Bizos this may be helpful in response and in fairness to the witness, on page 13 of the record, of the bundle, paragraph 4 he states</text>
		</line>
		<line number="405" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I was instructed by Captain van Zyl&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="406">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="407">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="408">
			<speaker>UNKNOWN LADY</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="409">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Well if I may assist my learned friend, if you look at the very first line on page four, the same appears.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="410">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="411">
			<speaker>UNKNOWN LADY</speaker>
			<text>I beg your pardon, my apologies.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="412">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Maybe Mr Chairman through you I can assist my learned friend if he looks at the very top of page four.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="413">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Four?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="414">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="415">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I would accept that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="416">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="417">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="418">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="419">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I just wish to point out, if I can remember correctly the difference between the two statements is minimal.  At that stage Mr Mac Adams just wanted more particulars about certain issues.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="420">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>You told us that you were concerned in reading about how to counter the revolutionary warfare that the country was involved in..</text>
		</line>
		<line number="421">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I can just say I had model for anti-revolutionary action, I had a model of the revolutionary onslaught and what I remember at that stage came about from what I studied.  I never studied a course in counter-strategies.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="422">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="423">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="424">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And not what to do with it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="425">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No Mr Chairman, I did not make a study of that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="426">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Did you ever come across &quot;The Lessons from Past Revolutionary Wars&quot; by a Brigadier Fraser?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="427">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="428">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And did you never attend any lectures in which the name was mentioned?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="429">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="430">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="431">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="432">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="433">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, the only documents I had was my own statement, I did not have one of these bounded volumes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="434">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Please look at page 101 and you will see that there was a telephone discussion between General van Rensburg and Brigadier van der Westhuizen, at the bottom of the page, do you see that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="435">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="436">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And then the three names are set out: Matthew Goniwe, Mbolelo Goniwe and Ford Calata.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="437">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="438">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And then it said</text>
		</line>
		<line number="439" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;It is proposed that abovenamed persons be permanently removed from society as a matter of urgency&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="440">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Do you see that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="441">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="442">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Now here we have a situation that a Brigadier in the JMC procedure, process has to report to a General in the Secretariat of the Security Council, has to request for a death warrant for the people.  You agree with that interpretation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="443">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, I agree with Mr Bizos but if I look at this sentence there is no request just a proposal.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="444">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="445">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Although this is not a problem for me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="446">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="447">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is what I can draw the inference from what stands here.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="448">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And the next inference that we can draw is that not even a Brigadier in the army could order the killing of three people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="449">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>It appears like that yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="450">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="451">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, I was never involved on the level you are referring to.  Communication between the regional body between these two bodies, I was not part of that.  All I can remember is that Brigadier van Rensburg was the Chairman of that JMC(?).</text>
		</line>
		<line number="452">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Did you think that a Captain in the security police had the authority to tell you to kill four people without any reference to his superiors?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="453">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairman, I did not accept that a Captain would give such an instruction but I accepted that he received this instruction from somebody else.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="454">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Did you ask him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="455">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, I did not ask him Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="456">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Why not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="457">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="458">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>You say that it happens like that throughout the word.  I suppose you mean in orders given: keep the filing system in order, go and take a statement here or do some other lawful activity, do you say that killing, orders to kill were accepted without any question, without any enquiry as to why and from the orders came above?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="459">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, what I mean by that is that organisations like the CIA and others, they functioned on a need to know basis.  If you received a command from your seniors in any of the organisations you accept that it would have been approved in that organisation.  I believed that Captain van Zyl would not give that instruction and ask me to participate in an operation if he did not get the authorisation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="460">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="461">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="462">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Well, what do you mean, what was the difference?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="463">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="464">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>You use this matter of innocent people, who were you to judge who is innocent and who is guilty?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="465">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="466">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  Well, when did you for the first hear that this order came from someone even above Colonel Snyman, when did you first hear that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="467">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>When consideration was given to apply for amnesty, then it was brought under my attention.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="468">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Who brought it to your attention that it came from above Mr Snyman?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="469">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="470">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Initially I accepted that Major du Plessis amongst others, was aware of this, this is what I thought but I was not sure what the hierarchy or the line of command was from there.  I would not have been part of such an operation of Colonel - did not have Colonel du Plessis approval because I worked under his direct command in another section from van Zyl.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="471">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Did Mr van Zyl tell you that he had been to Colonel Snyman and Snyman had said: &quot;Do what is best for South Africa&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="472">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>He did not use those words when he spoke to me.  He told me afterwards, during this first phase of the amnesty application, that Colonel Snyman gave the instruction but the detail of the discussions and the exact wording like: &quot;Do what is in the best interest of South Africa&quot;, those words were not discussed with me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="473">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="474">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Only afterwards when we started consulting with our attorney.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="475">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  When you learnt that Mr Snyman had given the order and when you learnt that it must have come from someone above Mr Snyman, did you go to Mr Snyman and ask him: &quot;Tell me, who gave this order that got all of us into this mess&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="476">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairman, I did not do that.  After Mr Snyman and I had left the police force we had little contact with one another.  I saw him for the first time again during that meeting in Pretoria.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="477">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>You were already well on your road to transformation at that stage?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="478">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="479">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>This was complete transformation by the time you learnt that Mr Snyman and someone above him were responsible.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="480">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="481">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Your transformation was complete by the time you learnt that it was Mr Snyman and someone above him that gave the orders down to Mr van Rensburg, Mr du Plessis came - van Zyl and it came to you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="482">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="483">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Your transformation was complete.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="484">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="485">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And you were already seeking the forgiveness of the family?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="486">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, not at that stage Mr Chairman, that came only at a later stage.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="487">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Came at a later stage.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="488">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I made contact with the family after I had applied for amnesty.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="489">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="490">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="491">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Well what was your speculation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="492">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="493">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="494">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Do you believe that knowing the full truth yourself and telling the full truth would have helped you in your personal condition?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="495">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Definitely yes, this is what this whole process is about.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="496">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, but outside this process you had an opportunity, did you not, to ask Mr Snyman: &quot;Here I am having to apply for amnesty, suffering from post-traumatic shock&quot; ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="497">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="498">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="499">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="500">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>You see ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="501">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>When you went to the family in the hope that you would be forgiven, according to these minutes you were asked certain questions not so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="502">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="503">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Including details of the deaths of these four unfortunate people, did you not think it wise to ask around after that meeting as to where did this permission or authority come from?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="504">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="505">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text>Did you take cognisance of the fact that the political leaders of that time denied that they ever gave authorisation that offences should be committed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="506">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I knew about that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="507">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text>Did that not motivate you furthermore to try and find out if they did not give the permission, who did and then approach Snyman and du Plessis and van Rensburg and van Zyl in this regard?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="508">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I did not ask them Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="509">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text>[No English translation]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="510">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="511">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What has that comment got to do with the question, that you protected and kept certain people in power?  The question was that when these people whom you kept in power announced for the world to hear, that they had not participated in any suchlike crimes, did it not give rise to you, not give rise to any thoughts that you should now find out where this authority came from?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="512">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, at that stage I would have liked to know who was responsible for approving this whole operation but I did not make any enquiries.  I want to add however, even up till today I still want to know where this line of command has stopped.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="513">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>You posed a question, a rhetorical question a short while ago, would the politicians not have asked: &quot;Is it a coincidence that all these high level activists are being killed&quot;?   Is that a question that you put to yourself at the time that you started preparing to kill Mr Goniwe and his colleagues?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="514">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairman, those were my own thoughts when this process of transformation started and I realised that somewhere up there there was an authority.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="515">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>In your application, in the minutes you say that the structures decided to have them killed, do you remember that?  Just have a look at page 4 ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="516">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, to which document are you referring?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="517">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>In the minutes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="518">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I have it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="519">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Exhibit DD, the minutes of the meeting.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="520">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I have it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="521">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>The 3rd line</text>
		</line>
		<line number="522" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;He pointed out in response to a question that it was the top structures who decided this operation should be carried out and that the people who gave the command will be coming forward at the Amnesty Hearing&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="523">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="524">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Which were the top structures?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="525">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>My line of command from Captain van Zyl, to the top.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="526">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>A structures means a body does it not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="527">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it means a body.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="528">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Now Mr Snyman was not a body, he was not a structure, which structures were you referring to?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="529">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, I want to indicate something to you.  In the first place this whole meeting took place in English and my  English is relatively good but it is not 100%, I could have made wrong word choices.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="530">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="531">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Would the GBS be a structure?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="532">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I would regard the GBS as a structure.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="533">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And would that be a top structure?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="534">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it would be a top structure.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="535">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Would the Secretariat of the Security Council be a structure?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="536">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="537">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And would that be a top structure?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="538">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Definitely, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="539">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And would the police be a structure?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="540">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="541">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And would that be a top structure at the head office level?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="542">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Well, either on regional or headquarters level.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="543">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  And would Cradock be a structure of the security police?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="544">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="545">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="546">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="547">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it would a structure but not a top structure.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="548">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="549">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And would the army be a structure?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="550">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="551">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And would people holding the position of General and Brigadier be part of the top structure of the army?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="552">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="553">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>You had no quarrel with the words that you used in this paragraph when you were asked whether the minutes are correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="554">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="555">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And would you agree that to the ordinary reader this statement that it was the top structures represented your view at the time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="556">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>If I look at the meaning here, I accept it.  The question was about who authorised this operation.  What was I was trying to tell you is that the instructions came from the top, that is what I tried to convey to them.  There is a technical problem with the word in the minutes but what I tried to say is that the command or the instruction came from the top, it was a very important aspect for them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="557">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And did you say, towards the bottom of that page</text>
		</line>
		<line number="558" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;It was possible the SADF were planning the same operation at this level&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="559">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="560" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;at this level he was a Lieutenant, they operated independently&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="561">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Did you say that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="562">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>No Mr Chairman, I think my learned friend must read what is written there</text>
		</line>
		<line number="563" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot; At his level in brackets he was a Lieutenant&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="564">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Oh at his level.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="565">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>His level.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="566">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="567">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;at his level&quot;, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="568" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;It was possible the SADF were planning the same operation.  At his level he was a Lieutenant, they operated independently&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="569">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="570">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>You said that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="571">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="572">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Did you say, as appears on page 5</text>
		</line>
		<line number="573" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;When questioned regarding the disappearance of all documentation between the 16th and 26th of June 1995 at Cradock, he said: &quot;If it was destroyed at Cradock, there should still have been copies at the regional office in Port Elizabeth&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="574">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Did you say that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="575">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="576">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Do you agree that that is in conflict with  your evidence that the files were destroyed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="577">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, if you look at the dates referred to here, between the 16th and the 26th of June no documentation was destroyed at that time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="578">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Do you agree that you said that</text>
		</line>
		<line number="579" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;He strongly denied that any&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="580">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="581" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;When questioned regarding the disappearance of all the documentation between the 16th and the 16th of June at Cradock, he said: &quot;If it was destroyed at Cradock there still have been copies at the regional office in Port Elizabeth&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="582">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="583">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Well why did you say the files were destroyed and you described the manner in which they were destroyed if this is correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="584">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, I have a problem with the interpretation of this paragraph.  As I read it here, the people asked me if all documentation or whether documents were destroyed between the 16th and the 26th of June at Cradock, that is what this entails.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="585">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="586">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="587" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;He strongly denied that any informers had been involved in the operation, he said they had taken a chance on the four returning to Cradock that day as they had done in the past.  He said the four were definitely not followed on that day&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="588">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="589">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="590">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And you answered early today that on two occasions your own informers indicated to you that day that in all likelihood these - the combination of these four would be in the motor vehicle.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="591">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="592">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>When you spoke to the families you indicated to them that informers had not played a part in the stopping ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="593">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, no informers participated in this operation.  That was the question asked of me during this meeting, they asked whether informers were involved in this operation namely the elimination itself and I unequivocally stated that no informers were involved.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="594">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So your interpretation of the word: &quot;operation&quot; was the actual commission of the crime?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="595">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="596">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You disregarded the information that you required to get them into custody as part of the operation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="597">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="598">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The ability to get them into your hands was not regarded as part of the operation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="599">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Chairman.  In other words to abduct them or to intercept them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="600">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And you needed the assistance of informers to do so, not so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="601">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="602">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="603">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="604">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="605">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="606" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;He said they had taken a chance on the four returning to Cradock that day&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="607">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="608">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible] wrongly because I understood that you knew that those four people would be in the vehicle.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="609">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="610">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text>And  then you executed this operation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="611">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, we were not sure whether - we knew that they were in Port Elizabeth but we were not certain whether they would sleep over in Port Elizabeth with Mr Derrick Swarts or return to Cradock.  There was a possibility that they would sleep over and that we would miss them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="612">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text>Let me take it one step further, that certainty you had came from the information you received from the informers.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="613">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="614">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="615">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="616">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text>So you knew that those four people would be in the vehicle, you knew they were on their way to Cradock.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="617">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, no.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="618">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text>That was the information conveyed to you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="619">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairman, the information I had is they confirmed that the people were, those four people were in Port Elizabeth.  There was the possibility that they could sleep over.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="620">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="621">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, I agree.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="622">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="623">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, that was not abnormal to me, informers were a very prominent subject during those years and discussed during meetings for example, in that area and in Port Elizabeth.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="624">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	During each meeting we had discussion with the faceless people sitting there, the people who were the informers and it was very important to know these things because those people saw those informers as traitors and as part of the oppressors.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="625">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="626">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Just to go for a tangent, you said earlier that your informers would have been shocked if they had learned that you had eliminated the people that they gave information about.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="627">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="628">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="629">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Mr Chairman, they gave us a lot of information and because of that we could establish the pattern and the whole core of the security branch was based on gathering of intelligence through the informers.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="630">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Where were you when the PEBCO 3 disappeared?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="631">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I cannot say where I was exactly, I was in Port Elizabeth.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="632">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Did you become aware of their disappearance?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="633">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="634">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Who did you pick it up from?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="635">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="636">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="637">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Only with the amnesty process.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="638">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And where did you think they were from 1985 to 1996 when the amnesty process that you were involved in came into being, where were they for 11 years?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="639">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="640">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="641">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, I know at that stage the rumours were that they had left the country, I could not confirm this.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="642">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Who started those rumours?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="643">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I cannot remember.  I can remember the questions that were asked about this.  I cannot remember whether this was done by legal teams but I know that there were rumours that they were detained at the police station etc., etc.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="644">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="645">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="646">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="647">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Excuse me?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="648">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>After they were reported missing, what happened to their files?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="649">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I would accept that it would be the same as in the process which I appended before, that the difference would be here that there was no confirmation over there where ...[indistinct],  their files would not be destroyed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="650">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The files were kept for so many years?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="651">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="652">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And not one of your colleagues came to tell you that: &quot;Listen, these people are dead, destroy these files&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="653">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairperson, nobody came to tell me during that time that they had died.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="654">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Did you know the PEBCO 3?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="655">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="656">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And did you know them as well as you knew Mr Mhlawuli?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="657">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, at that stage I knew them relatively well.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="658">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>As well as you knew Mr Goniwe?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="659">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="660">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And if one of the PEBCO 3 had been in the car instead of Mr Mhlawuli, would you have killed him as well?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="661">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairperson.  The requirement of the operation - we discussed different scenarios, that is someone who was not identified for this operation was in the motor vehicle, we would abandon the operation.  As well as the fact that we foresee the possibility that an unknown person could be in the motor vehicle and then we would not continue with the operation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="662">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Did the PEBCO 3 have fairly thick files also with photographs in?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="663">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="664">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Have a look at the bottom of page 6 of what you are recorded as having said at a meeting with the relatives.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="665">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Page 6, the last sentence Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="666">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="667">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR TAYLOR</text>
		</line>
		<line number="668" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;In fact he had not even&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="669">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="670">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Well, let me read it out then.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="671">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I will read it Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="672">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, the witness has started.  My learned friend is badgering.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="673">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR TAYLOR</text>
		</line>
		<line number="674" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;In fact&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="675">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="676">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="677">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR TAYLOR</text>
		</line>
		<line number="678" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;In fact he had not even known of their existence although he had heard rumours about the PEBCO 3 and was not so stupid as not to recognise a pattern but it was not discussed&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="679">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Now:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="680" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;He did not even know of their existence&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="681">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Was that true or false?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="682">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Excuse me, can I just hear that question again?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="683">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The question is that it states in here that you did not know of the existence of the PEBCO 3, is that true or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="684">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, I knew of their existence, there was much referral to them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="685">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The question is, as it is here in this document, as when you had discussions with the family, did you tell them the truth?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="686">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="687">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What is the point you want to make Mr Booyens?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="688">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>The paragraph reads</text>
		</line>
		<line number="689" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;He ...[indistinct](?) to whether if it was automatic if you were a member of Section B, you were automatically  part of a hit squad&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="690">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="691">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Security branch.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="692">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR BOOYENS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="693" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Security branch&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="694">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>ja, sorry.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="695" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;you were automatically part of hit squad&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="696">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>was:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="697" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;No, in fact he did not even know of their existence&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="698">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR BOOYENS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="699" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Hit squads&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="700">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="701">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, let for the purposes of my question accept that interpretation which is a possible interpretation of it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="702">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	But you said, and that is really the aspect that I want to canvass with you:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="703" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;He had heard rumours about the PEBCO 3 and was not so stupid as not to recognise a pattern&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="704">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>What did you mean by that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="705">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="706">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>You were being questioned about Goniwe and his associates, correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="707">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="708">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And in saying that you would have been stupid if you did not recognise a pattern can only mean that your killing of Goniwe and others was part of the pattern of the PEBCO 3 having been killed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="709">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="710">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But from what I can gather here, unless you can point out a different interpretation, it appears that you had grave suspicion.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="711">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I would agree with that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="712">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And what were your suspicions?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="713">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="714">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="715">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>At that stage I had no knowledge of the circumstances of the disappearance of the PEBCO 3.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="716">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="717" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;In fact he had not even known of their&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="718">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="719" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;existence&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="720">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="721">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR BIZOS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="722" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="723">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="724">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>I want to deal with the question of Mr Mhlawuli and try and get facts and circumstances from you as to whether he was merely a victim as a result of being in that car or whether he was in fact targeted.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="725">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Now we know that he comes from Oudtshoorn.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="726">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="727">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And that is the South Western District.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="728">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="729">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And the UDF was divided into regions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="730">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="731">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Under which region was Oudtshoorn?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="732">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="733">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Well, I think that you are correct in our speculation that it was in the Western Cape.  Who were the regional leaders of the Western Cape in 1985, that Mr Mhlawuli would have to answer to for anything that he did?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="734">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="735">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Well, let me just tell you, you might recognise a few of the names.  Trevor Manual?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="736">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I know that name Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="737">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Cheryl Corollus?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="738">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="739">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And Johnny Essel?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="740">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="741">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Now, did you have any information as to what was the position of Mr Mhlawuli in Oudtshoorn to make decisions as to what plans would be put into operation in that particular region?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="742">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="743">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Did you have any information as to whether or not he was formally a member of any organisation which was affiliated to the UDF in the Western Cape Region?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="744">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I accepted that, that he was involved in some organisation because of the fact he was involved here.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="745">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="746">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="747">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Did you try to find out whether he was one?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="748">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="749">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Did you at any stage communicate with the head of the security police in Oudtshoorn to find out?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="750">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="751">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Do you agree that a reasonable investigator could, by the making of a simple telephone call, establish that fact?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="752">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="753">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="754">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="755">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="756">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="757">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>If I should give you now my honest opinion I have to admit that it should have been done.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="758">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The basis that was used to sentence to death was weak at that time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="759">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="760">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>But without knowing what organisational position he held, whether even he was a member of any UDF affiliated organisation, why should you believe that he was in a position to do anything in Oudtshoorn, whatever the wishes or advice of Mr Goniwe may have been?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="761">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="762">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="763">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, this would have been better.  I would have had more information if I liaised with them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="764">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="765">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I cannot explain this.  I can remember one thing, that I sent reports through where his name was mentioned.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="766">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text>At the best to you, that inference you make was based on information from informers that were not confirmed in terms of objective facts.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="767">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, to an extent but it was confirmed though other sources of information.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="768">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text>You never consulted anyone, you had these rumours that informers mentioned that Mr Mhlawuli was responsible for these structures then established in the South Western district.  That was the rumours or the stories from the informers.  Except for that opinion from informers, you had no other confirmation of those rumours?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="769">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="770">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="771">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Did any of them tell you whether or not they had communicated with any security police officer in Oudtshoorn?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="772">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="773">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="774">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Not as far as my knowledge goes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="775">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Now did you liaise with Mr Eric Winter in Cradock about Mr Mhlawuli?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="776">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="777">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="778">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Not as far as I can recall Mr Chairperson.  What I could, on a daily basis or just about everyday I liaised with the Cradock Security Branch.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="779">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>All the more reason why you should have asked what they knew about Mr Mhlawuli.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="780">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>At that stage I asked them, and especially the three weeks before the operation, that I wanted all information concerning, on a daily basis, their movements and activities of Mr Goniwe, it should be sent to the regional office.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="781">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>We have an affidavit from Mr Winter, that he knew nothing about Mr Mhlawuli, would you accept that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="782">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="783">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="784">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="785">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="786">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="787">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Corroboration in this matter in relation to Mr Mhlawuli could possibly have been obtained by making two telephone calls, one to Oudtshoorn and one to Cradock and neither were made.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="788">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>There were not telephone calls made.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="789">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MICROPHONES SWITCHED OFF</text>
		</line>
		<line number="790">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Did you know Edgar Ngoi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="791">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="792">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Who was he?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="793">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>He was a high profile UDF person from Port Elizabeth.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="794">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>What precise position did he hold?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="795">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>He was amongst others, a member of PEBCO, he attended UDF regional meetings.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="796">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And Stone Sizane?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="797">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I remember him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="798">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>What position did he hold?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="799">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="800">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And Ronald White?  Roland White?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="801">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I recognise the name, he was under the white section at that time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="802">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And Dennis Neer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="803">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Correct, he was involved in labour relations activities, trade union activities.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="804">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Any other position that you know?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="805">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>They were all affiliated with the UDF.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="806">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>I know that, but how important was he - the UDF structures, do you know at all?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="807">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>On the trade union sphere he was a very important figure.  I did not work with him separately because we had a separate union desk.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="808">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Did you know Prince Msotho?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="809">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="810">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And Twabo Ndubi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="811">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I can remember the name Mr Chairman, but once again not full particulars.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="812">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Doctor Marillou?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="813">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Doctor who?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="814">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Marillou?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="815">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="816">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Henry Fazi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="817">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="818">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>What position did he hold?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="819">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>He was on the PEBCO management and he also attended UDF regional meetings.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="820">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  And Stone Sizani?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="821">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I recognise the name, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="822">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Do you know anything else about him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="823">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I talking under correction Mr Chairman, but I think he was involved in the Port Elizabeth Youth Congress.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="824">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Do you know of any other position that he held?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="825">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, not that I can remember.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="826">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="827">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, with some of the names I indicated that they attended UDF regional meetings.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="828">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>I excluded those, there were in all 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and in relation to 5 you knew nothing about them other than you had heard the name.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="829">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="830">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Now, would you agree that persons holding office together with Mr Matthew Goniwe who was the 11th person or one of 10 anyway, one of the 10, were much closer &quot;trawante&quot; than Mr Mhlawuli?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="831">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Definitely yes Mr Chairman, on regional level, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="832">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>So that if the original instruction to seek out the &quot;trawante&quot; of Mr Goniwe, why did you not choose from the regional executive and decided - if you evidence is correct, on a person that you knew so little about and check so little about like Mr Mhlawuli?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="833">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, right from the start of this planning process and the execution of the operation we were told that it was concerning with the rural areas and the influence Cradock had on the rest of the areas.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="834">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	At that stage we were extremely worried that the mobilisation and the political awareness caused problems and also the implementation of the G Plan.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="835">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Did you think that if you left the whole UDF region members intact and you only executed Mr Goniwe and his other companions, that the UDF that represented the whole region, both rural and urban, the problems would be solved?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="836">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="837">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Alright well.  Who was Mr Ficks Kobesi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="838">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, I know the name, if I remember correctly he was also involved in trade union activities.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="839">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Where?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="840">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>In the Port Elizabeth/Utenhage environment.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="841">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And who was Mr Emson Banda?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="842">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="843">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Or Mr Aubrey Marley?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="844">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="845">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Who was Mr Chris Mbikela?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="846">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="847">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And who was Dan Sandi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="848">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="849">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Where did he come from?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="850">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Who was Gogile Inkuinti?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="851">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>He was active in the Port Alfred district, amongst other involved at that time during the establishment of alternative structure in Port Alfred and environment.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="852">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Who was Kokele Mkwenti?  No, I asked you about ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="853">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Can you repeat the name please?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="854">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Kokele Mkwenti.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="855">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="856">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And who was Koleka Mkwenti?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="857">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="858">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And who was Thembile Beck?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="859">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="860">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And who was Chris Nissan?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="861">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="862">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>I know it may be a well known name but where was he from and what did he do?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="863">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="864">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>The names that I have read to you after indicating to you who were on the National Executive, are all in the rural areas and you only knew for certain about one of them and you were correct, that he came from Port Alfred, Mr Kopile Mkwenti.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="865">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="866">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="867">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="868">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  Surely in order to put an end to what you call the G Plan and the terrible consequence or - ja, the G Plan, knowledge of the people in the rural areas within your own jurisdiction was more important than a comparative stranger from Oudtshoorn.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="869">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Please repeat the question Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="870">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>The people who I put to you were leading people in UDF affiliated organisations whom you did not know.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="871">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="872">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="873">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Now if that is correct, how come that you knew so little about the people putting the G Plan into operation in your own area of jurisdiction and so much about a person who came from outside?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="874">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, I would say that during that time when this operation was planned I paid attention especially to the people from Cradock.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="875">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="876">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I remember two, Mr Hashe, Mr Godolosi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="877">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Please give me the names that you know.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="878">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Hashe and Mr Godolosi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="879">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="880">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="881">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>What position did he hold?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="882">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>He was on the Executive Committee of PEBCO.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="883">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>What precise position did he hold?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="884">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="885">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="886">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="887">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And what position did he hold?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="888">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="889">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>What position did he hold?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="890">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="891">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And did you know Mr Galele?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="892">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="893">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, you got the first name correct.  Who was he?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="894">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="895">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>What position did he hold?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="896">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="897">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Did you know Mr Fazi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="898">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="899">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>What was his first name?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="900">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Henry.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="901">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Do you now remember that he was one of the PEBCO 3?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="902">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, he was not one of the PEBCO 3 Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="903">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Was Mr Champion Galele a member of the PEBCO 3, or one of the PEBCO 3?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="904">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>If I remember correctly, yes Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="905">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>You see I am going to put to you that Mr Godolosi was the President, Mr Fazi was his Deputy, Mr Hashe was the General Secretary and Mr Champion Galele was the organiser.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="906">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Now here was an organisation in Port Elizabeth itself, you know mighty little about the top structures of the former organisation in Port Elizabeth, how come you know so little about them and so much about Mr Mhlawuli?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="907">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, during that time, I think it was about 13 years ago, I knew all those people, I knew the organisation, I knew all their positions, 13 years is a long time.  During this time and during this amnesty application I had to work very hard to gather all the facts regarding the Cradock 4, I did not do the same with these people.  If I go and sit down and think deeply, I would perhaps remember.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="908">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I can understand that and we must make allowances for it but then equally it may well be that what you tell us about Mr Mhlawuli may be self-serving reconstruction.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="909">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="910">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="911">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="912">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Do you know Mr Edgar Ngoi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="913">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="914">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Who was he?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="915">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="916">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Who was the chairman of the UDF at that time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="917">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="918">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Was it not Mr Ngoi?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="919">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>It could possibly be yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="920">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>You say that you concentrated on Cradock, who was the chairman of Cradora?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="921">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Goniwe at a certain stage and at certain time Mr Calata acted as Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="922">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>When do you say Mr Goniwe was the chairman of Cradora?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="923">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, any time from the beginning of 1984 to the middle of 1985 approximately.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="924">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>So at the time of his death, you say that he was president of Cradora?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="925">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="926">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>During the period of your investigations at the end of May, beginning of June 1985, who was the chairman of Cradora?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="927">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Goniwe Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="928">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="929">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, as far as I can remember yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="930">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And is that on the basis of reliable information that you received?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="931">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="932">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Was there a president of Cradora?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="933">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="934">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And who - was there a vice-chairman?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="935">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>There would be yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="936">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Who was the vice-chairman?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="937">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="938">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Was there a secretary?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="939">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Definitely yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="940">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Who was the secretary?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="941">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="942">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Was there a deputy secretary?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="943">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="944">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Who was the treasurer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="945">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="946">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Was there an organiser?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="947">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="948">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="949">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>The officials of Cradoya?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="950">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="951">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, at a stage I could remember that Mr Calata was the chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="952">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Was there a chairman or vice-chairman or a president?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="953">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>It would have been either a chairman or a president and he would have a secretary and a treasurer and other portfolios.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="954">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And who was secretary of Cradoya?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="955">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="956">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And who was the organiser?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="957">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I can remember.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="958">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And who was the treasurer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="959">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="960">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And who was deputy president?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="961">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="962">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Was there a COSAS in Cradock?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="963">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="964">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Did you know the names of anybody that was involved in COSAS?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="965">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Well amongst others, two people who regularly visited COSAS, Mr Mkhonto and then a person I previously mentioned, Mr Madora Jacobs.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="966">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="967">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="968">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Do you know Mr Mopameni?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="969">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="970">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Nombuso Chachana, did that name mean anything to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="971">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="972">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Lumkile Georgiasi, does that name mean anything to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="973">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="974">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Let us deal with first of all, your suggestion that Sparrow Mkhonto was connected with COSAS, why do you say that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="975">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Because he visited Port Elizabeth and contacted COSAS people in Port Elizabeth.  Amongst others at a certain instance, if I remember correctly, he made contact with Mr Lulu Johnson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="976">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>What was his age and what would his interest have been in having anything to do with the affairs of COSAS?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="977">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="978">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Does the name Victor Powani mean anything to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="979">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="980">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Does the name Gladwell Makahula mean anything to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="981">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="982">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Who was he?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="983">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="984">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Was in what?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="985">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>He was a member of Cradora.  If I remember correctly he was on the executive.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="986">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Of Cradora?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="987">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Cradora, Cradock Residents Association.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="988">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Now, I am going to put to you that you have shown singular lack of knowledge and/or memory in relation to the structures governing the Cradock organisations.  Are you able to deny that in fact the president of Cradora was Mr Gladwell Makahula?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="989">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="990">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, just confine yourself to the direct answer so that we can make some progress.  Can you admit or deny that Mr Sparrow Mkhonto was the Chairman?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="991">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="992">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>That the secretary was Mr Matthew Goniwe.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="993">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I cannot deny this.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="994">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>That the treasurer was Mr Fil Calata.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="995">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I can also not deny that Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="996">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And the organiser was Mr Mbulelo Goniwe.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="997">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I cannot that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="998">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>That in relation to Cradoya executive in 1985 the president was Ford Calata, the chairperson was Mzimkhulu Zenzile, can you deny that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="999">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1000">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Neither of those two positions.  That the secretary was Sopomopo Mene.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1001">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1002">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>The secretary was Lulamele Josi Jasi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1003">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1004">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>That the organiser was Mbulelo Goniwe.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1005">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1006">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Did the name Veken Soga mean anything to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1007">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1008">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1009">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1010">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1011">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1012">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1013">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1014">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, well you see, even I could, I think, understand that Nomsa is a woman and she was the deputy president of Cradoya.  Do you agree that you know and remember very little about most of the people in the structures of the UDF affiliated organisations in Cradock?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1015">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1016">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1017">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1018">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  Very well, we will split it and then perhaps ask you which applies to each name which is going to burden the record even further.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1019">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Tell us, which of these people have you never heard the name of?  How many of them have you never heard the name of?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1020">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, I did not count.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1021">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Well, we will ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1022">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Taylor, tell me ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1023">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>when the record becomes available.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1024">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>if you knew these people well or to any significant extent, you would have known what and remembered what positions they held and in which organisations, is that not so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1025">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1026">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I can recognise some of the names but I cannot say with each one where that person was placed.  There are names there, I can think of more names, people like Sele Jack and Michael Cheko who was at PEBCO.  Some I remember better and some not.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1027">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1028">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1029">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I do not ask these questions to test your memory, I ask these questions in order to establish whether you were in the proper position to assess the threat that you perceived they presented to the security of this country.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1030">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I understand it, yes I understand it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1031">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1032">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1033">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1034">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, but you see, what you knew about Mr Mhlawuli also was more than - it was the same time, how many years?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1035">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>13 years.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1036">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1037">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, I would not have done it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1038">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Well, ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1039">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Initially I told you which names were discussed and no other persons outside, besides those persons that were mentioned, were considered.  If any other person was in the car besides those who were discussed this operation would not have taken place.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1040">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Let us just take Mr Mhlawuli, did you know where he was born, before I put the version to Mr van Zyl?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1041">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No Mr Chair, I heard it here.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1042">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1043">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1044">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1045">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> MR TAYLOR:   No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1046">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1047">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1048">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1049">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I just knew that Mhlawuli at time visited Cradock, I did not know he had family there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1050">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>The first factor that influenced you in deciding that he was a candidate for execution was his regular visits to Cradock, you told us in your evidence, correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1051">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Amongst other yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1052">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1053">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Four times 0?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1054">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>So that his regular presence at Cradock may be innocently explained that like most school teachers and other people in the world, comes holiday time they want to go to the place where they are born and where their families are.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1055">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chair, that is so ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1056">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And if you knew, if you ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1057">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>The witness was still busy answering Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1058">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1059">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Sorry Mr Chairperson, what I wanted to say was, it is so that he visited there but he went to Cradora meetings there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1060">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1061">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, if that was what he did at Cradock, we would known that, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1062">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1063">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>The fact that he just visited family and was there socially?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1064">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, if those facts are correct, his visits to Cradock were completely contra-indicating that he was involved in subversive activities and that was the reason for his visits to Cradock.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1065">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1066">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1067">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, at some instances it was a public meeting.  He moved regularly with the executive members, members of the management.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1068">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1069">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1070">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1071">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1072">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And if I remember correctly from the evidence that we had in the Delmas trial, it was - there were at least many hundreds if not thousands of people that attended Cradora public meetings.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1073">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I know very little of the Delmas matter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1074">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1075">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, I cannot deny it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1076">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Also that those meetings held in a hall were being recorded by the security police and transcripts were available of what was being said at that meeting, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1077">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1078">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1079">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, in that time we definitely did it.  I cannot remember the detail of every meeting.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1080">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1081">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1082">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Please answer the question.  Were transcripts of the proceedings of Cradora made available to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1083">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1084">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1085">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1086">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, I cannot remember if I saw those transcriptions but I wan to add it is normal procedure to make transcriptions of such meetings, it was done throughout the region.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1087">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>So that we can assume can we not, that the transcript of these meetings were conveyed to the security police and if you personally did not see them, other persons who were watching out for the commission of any offences at public meetings of Cradora would have studied them?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1088">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1089">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1090">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1091">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>We can therefore assume that even though, with the transcripts available and the tapes available, no witnesses would have been necessary in order to prove whether any offence was committed by any speaker, nobody was charged?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1092">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1093">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1094">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I just want to say that public meetings that were held the speakers always made sure they did not say something that we could use against them.  We experienced the same at WH11.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1095">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Are you serious about that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1096">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1097">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1098">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1099">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Well, what did he say?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1100">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1101">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1102">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	If speakers were careful, what was wrong with Mr Mhlawuli listening to careful speakers at public meetings at Cradora and why should that be held against him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1103">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I never said it was illegal to be there, the fact that Mr Mhlawuli was there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1104">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Sir, the second ground which you gave for you deciding that Mr Mhlawuli was one of the &quot;trawante&quot; to be executed together with Mr Goniwe was because he attended meetings of Cradora.  What I am asking you is, how does he make himself a candidate for execution if he attended meetings at which speakers were careful not to say things which were unlawful?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1105">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, I did not say the presence of Mr Mhlawuli at Cradora meetings was a motivation for his elimination. I just responded on questions put to me, what I knew of Mr Mhlawuli and one of the things that I know about Mr Mhlawuli is that he attended Cradora meetings.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1106">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>No Mr Taylor, earlier in your evidence you were asked what was - what made Mr Mhlawuli so dangerous that one could gain the impression or even guess that he was likely to install these institutions of destruction in Oudtshoorn and one of the reasons you gave was that he was being influenced by Mr Goniwe and he was in the company of Mr Goniwe and he attended meetings of Cradora and Cradoya.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1107">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1108">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1109">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>I beg your pardon Sir.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1110">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1111">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he referred to the meetings of Cradora in his evidence in chief already and not only in answer to me Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1112">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1113">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text>Mr Taylor, the point is, that the attendance of these meetings places Mr Mhlawuli in the same category as hundreds of other people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1114">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I agree with this, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1115">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1116">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1117">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Did you the relationship between Ford Calata and Matthew Goniwe and Mr Mhlawuli, firstly in relation to the church that their parents belonged to?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1118">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1119">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And that the father of the one was the choir master of the others?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1120">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1121">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>That they were fellow teachers?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1122">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I was aware of that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1123">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And although there were a couple of years difference in ages and Mr Goniwe was a senior by a couple of years, they were at the same school.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1124">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1125">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1126">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1127">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1128">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1129">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>As a labourer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1130">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1131">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>He had standard 8 education.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1132">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I did not know that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1133">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1134">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chair, as far as I know in some instances he did liaise with COSAS.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1135">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Of what significance would that be?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1136">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>He was actively involved with the youth, the scholars because of his age - in Cradock.  Mr Chairperson, I do not want to be out of order, I just want to make a remark what is important for me at this stage that I wish to point out especially with the Cradock situation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1137">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	The organisations were closely knitted together.  This did not mean that when there was a Cradoya meeting that only Cradoya members were there and the opposite with Cradora as well.  Maybe more of that - they would have discussed the objectives of that organisation but there were other organisations in that town as well at that time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1138">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Now, ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1139">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Can we take that short break?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1140">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1141">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1142">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>ON RESUMPTION</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1143">
			<speaker>ERIC TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>(s.u.o.)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1144">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1145">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1146">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Did you know that the one pair of grandparents, the paternal grandparents were in - no the paternal were in grandparents and the maternal grandparents were in Port Elizabeth?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1147">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1148">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1149">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1150">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Right.  Now, did you know as to why they left the Ciskei and they came to Oudtshoorn and whether that had anything to do with the school unrest?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1151">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1152">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1153">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1154">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1155">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1156">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1157">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1158">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1159">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, the activities were the first priority.  I can just add that part of a personal file of every person had a sub-file in which the - they called the history file.  There notes were made about the background of the people as sketched by Mr Bizos and that would have been put on record, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1160">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1161">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1162">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1163">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman it could be, although it was more based on his present activities, we placed the emphasis on those.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1164">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1165">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, all opinions and decisions were made on the basis of only the activities of suspects, the activities in the struggle of the day.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1166">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Do you or do you not agree that the personal background is necessary in order to assess what administrative action may be taken before the death sentence is decided upon and executed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1167">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1168">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1169">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, because we only formed out opinions and decisions based on the activities of these suspects.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1170">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1171">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Where were these informers that gave you information, in Oudtshoorn, in Cradock or in Port Elizabeth?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1172">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>In Port Elizabeth and in the Cradock area, in two various towns in the Cradock area.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1173">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1174">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1175">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>All the more reason why you should have asked Mr Eric Winter and his informers and his security police to give you information.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1176">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, during those three weeks before the time I did not want to ask questions outside the normal questions to Winter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1177">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Why not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1178">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>It would not have been normal procedures Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1179">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>In the context of your decision to kill these four people, did you consider asking Winter and decided against it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1180">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairman, I contacted the branch on a daily basis but I went along the normal procedures.  During that time I did ask that this daily information regarding Mr Goniwe would be regarded as a priority and despatched to us as quickly as possible.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1181">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Is this from Mr Winter?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1182">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I can say specifically Mr Winter, I spoke to various people at Cradock including Mr Winter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1183">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1184">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1185">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>In which towns did you have informers?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1186">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1187">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>When did Mr Mhlawuli go to Somerset East?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1188">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1189">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1190">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1191">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1192">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1193">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>So you say that your informer had no personal contact with Mr Mhlawuli at all?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1194">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1195">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, and did you have any other informers anywhere that my have spoken to you about Mr Mhlawuli?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1196">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>In Port Elizabeth, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1197">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>When was Mr Mhlawuli in Port Elizabeth to speak to - for your informers in Port Elizabeth to get information?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1198">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mhlawuli visited Port Elizabeth more than once.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1199">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1200">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Whom did he visit?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1201">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1202">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>We only have your word but please let us - tell us what these informers form Port Elizabeth said?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1203">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>From the bits of in formation I gathered, it became clear that Mr Mhlawuli at that stage knew what the G Plan was about.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1204">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Well maybe, that he knew what the G Plan was about, so what?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1205">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1206">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>But that is a huge chunk that he knew about the G Plan, your informers tell you, and the rest you thought out, is that so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1207">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>On the evaluation and the interpretation of the information I came to the conclusion.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1208">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1209">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1210">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>But now the G Plan, the G Plan, if it was for the purposes that you have suggested, must have been known to hundreds at least hundreds of people if Mr Goniwe was busy putting it into operation all over the place.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1211">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1212">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>The information I had at that stage, and this is how I interpreted it and evaluated it, was that he was going to implement the G Plan ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1213">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1214">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1215">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>So how do you come to the conclusion that he was going to put the G Plan into operation elsewhere?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1216">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That was the information informers provided me with, they received this information via their channels.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1217">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>No, you are now changing your evidence Sir.  You told us that the only information that you had was that he knew the G Plan, for the rest you evaluated it and drew inferences, that has been your evidence up to now.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1218">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	You are now adding further information as having come to you when you said the only information was that he knew about the G Plan.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1219">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1220">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1221">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I did not say that was the only information, I said I had information that he knew about the G Plan.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1222">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>No, at least two or three times Sir, you said it was the only information and I challenge you to listen to the record, I appeal to the members of the Committee that were listening, your counsel is there to protect you, I have the backing of my colleagues and the member of the Commission who heard you at least two or three times saying that the only information that you had was that Mhlawuli knew about the G Plan.  Try another explanation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1223">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, I did not say it was the only information that we had.  Right from the start I said I had information about him visiting Port Elizabeth, attending various meetings and things - one of these things we are emphasising now is he had knowledge about the G Plan.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1224">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	We gathered information and all this information indicated that the idea was that Mr Mhlawuli had to establish alternative structures in Oudtshoorn.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1225">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Well, the record will speak for itself and I am putting to you that not only are you lying about the information that you have but you are now lying and contradicting yourself in relation as to what that information was.  Have you got any answer to that suggestion?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1226">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, I am trying to tell the truth to the best of my ability as far as I can remember.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1227">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1228" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;The information I obtained was that Mhlawuli would implement the plans from Cradock in Oudtshoorn.  Other information was gathered from other informers&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1229">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1230">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>No but he may have said that more recently but the only information was that he had knowledge of the plan, it was said two or three times.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1231">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Yes, no, he may be - that more recently when I put to him that was a tremendous jump, that he may have said that but he clearly said that it was the only information.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1232">
			<speaker>ADV BOSMAN</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1233">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Oh yes, this was before he was tied down to the question: &quot;Was this the only information that you had&quot;?  No, thank you yes, I agree.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1234">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	You told us earlier on that there was also some unconfirmed suggestion that he was recruiting people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1235">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1236">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Where does that come from?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1237">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I heard that from an informer but right from the start I drew your attention to the fact that this information could not be confirmed.  During discussion between Lotz, van Zyl and myself we mentioned this fact and the terrorist desk was not my strong point regarding exiles or remembering the activities of exiles.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1238">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Let us just get this on record, your informers were paid?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1239">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1240">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And in order to get paid they had to supply some sort of information?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1241">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1242">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Now, did you know on the morning of the 27th that Mr Mhlawuli was leaving Cradock for Port Elizabeth?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1243">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairman, it was only established later on after they had arrived in Port Elizabeth.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1244">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>How was it established?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1245">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1246">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Now, you were under pressure to kill the people that you thought would pacify the situation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1247">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1248">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>At least three weeks had lapsed since that plan was hatched to kill them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1249">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1250">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>You did not know precisely who was in the car until you stopped it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1251">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1252">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, but how did you know that he would be coming back in the car?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1253">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>We were not sure about that either.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1254">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>You were not sure about that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1255">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1256">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>So that when I put the question to you: &quot;When you stopped them on the way back, you did not know who would be in the car&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1257">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1258">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Or some, even by your definition, innocent person may have been in the car.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1259">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That was not excluded, that was a possibility, it could have happened.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1260">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>It could have happened.  Now we will only have your word for it that you would have said: well, that you would have merely have questioned them for a bit and let them go.  I think that is the story that we have heard here, is that correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1261">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1262">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>But now, here was an opportunity to get rid of the three people from Cradock in a war that you thought that you were involved in, what difference would an innocent make if he happened to be in the car.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1263">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>It would have made a big difference Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1264">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1265">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1266">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>You would have to wait for another opportunity to arise for these three persons to be together.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1267">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1268">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1269">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1270">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>If you found Mr Goniwe and Mr Calata and Mr Mbulelo Goniwe, would you have killed the three?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1271">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1272">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>If you had found Mr Goniwe, Mr Calata, Mr Gladwell Makahula, would you have killed all three of them?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1273">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1274">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And if you found Mr Goniwe, Mr Calata and Mr Victor Piwani, would you have killed them?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1275">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1276">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Even if you asked: &quot;Who are you&quot;? and he said: &quot;Victor Piwani and I am the Deputy Secretary of Cradora&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1277">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairman.  We had a specific framework of names we were working according to.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1278">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1279">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>That was outside the framework of our authorisation.  Specific names were mentioned and there was no authorisation or no discussion or during the initial discussion with van Zyl and no other names were mentioned apart from these.  According to me there was no mandate to kill any other person.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1280">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Well, just give us the names again that you say you had a mandate to kill.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1281">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1282">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1283">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1284">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1285">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1286">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Then you would have not applied.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1287">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1288">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1289">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1290">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Only van Zyl and you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1291">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr van Zyl and I and at certain instances Lotz was present.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1292">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  So that we have it on your own evidence that you are - you also conspired to kill Mr Gladwell Makahula and Madodo Jacobs?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1293">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that was the names that were in the group.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1294">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1295">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, I applied for the murders Mr Chairman, I did not think of the effects that the other persons would hold in for me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1296">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Well, you see if Mr Mhlawuli was in the original four as you say, when did Mr Snyman give authority for him to be killed, according to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1297">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, he was not in the original group of four, he was in the original group of six or seven.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1298">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Who - when did Mr Snyman give authority for him to be killed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1299">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, at no stage at a discussion between Colonel Snyman, General van Rensburg, I do not at which times they discussed what.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1300">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text>Mr Taylor, after the discussions you and the other officer testified that you had to kill these six persons to resolve this problem.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1301">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1302">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text>The decision was then that they should be killed, these people?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1303">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>During the discussion between myself and Captain van Zyl, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1304">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text>All of them?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1305">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, or combinations of them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1306">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text>Combinations is easier, but the fact is all of them had to be killed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1307">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1308">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1309">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1310">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1311">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>There was no further operations.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1312">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text>Why not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1313">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Because people who took the initial decisions never gave further instructions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1314">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text>But it was not necessary because you already had the instruction, it was already decided that they should be killed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1315">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I was never approached again to participate in an operation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1316">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text>But what was the initial instruction, to kill all six, not so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1317">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1318">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text>Why did you not continue?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1319">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I cannot answer that question Mr Chairperson.  If further instruction was given we would have done so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1320">
			<speaker>MR POTGIETER</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1321">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Please have a look at page 4 of the record of your application for amnesty.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1322">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes Mr Chairperson?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1323">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Top, the first line</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1324" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Captain van Zyl later informed me and gave instruction to form part of a planned operation to eliminate these four persons&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1325">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1326">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Does that not contradict the evidence that you have given a short while ago that the instruction was to kill six?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1327">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1328">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1329">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1330">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Would you like to try another explanation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1331">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Can Mr Bizos just refer me to which page he is referring to?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1332">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, if you go back one page when you start your narrative, you say</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1333" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Approximately two or three weeks before June, the 27th&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1334">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Yes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1335" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;He gave me instructions to monitor these four persons&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1336">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>and then you say that he gave you instructions to have an operation.  Why does the four become six?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1337">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chair, at this stage we knew which four persons it was, the six persons was before that word: &quot;targets for elimination&quot; on the 27th.  As I mentioned before we established, we had confirmed that these were the four persons who were in Port Elizabeth.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1338">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1339" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Approximately two to three weeks before the 27th of June 1985, I received instructions from Captain van Zyl about the activities of these four persons and to monitor them because they were involved in activities&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1340">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1341">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Just to finish off the day.  You see, the fact that neither you nor Mr van Zyl are coming clean on this issue is that one page 48, paragraph 10 we read the following</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1342">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1343">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1344">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>48, paragraph 10.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1345">
			<speaker>MR BOOYENS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, just slow down.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1346">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR BIZOS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1347" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Who both worked at the black activities of that branch and gave instruction to help me to monitor the movements and activities of the three and to implement the operation&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1348">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1349">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1350">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, what is the question of this paragraph?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1351">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>How do you reconcile your evidence that it was four or seven when van Zyl says it was three?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1352">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I cannot testify to the fact of what Mr van Zyl mentioned here.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1353">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1354">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>I see what you mean Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1355">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Do I understand this wrong?  As I understand it, when you received this instruction mentioned was made only of three persons.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1356">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, it is not my ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1357">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Listen to the question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1358">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes, excuse me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1359">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And during the execution of this instruction the name of Mr Mhlawuli came up.  Do I understand this incorrectly?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1360">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>He came more to the fore pertinently as I understand it, but as I have said, earlier he did come to my attention.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1361">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1362">
			<speaker>MR TAYLOR</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1363">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible] stage Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1364">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>We will adjourn till half past nine tomorrow morning.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1365">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>