<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>amntrans</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY HEARING</type>
	<startdate>1997-12-01</startdate>
	<location>PRETORIA</location>
	<day>4</day>
	<names>MR CLIVE DERBY-LEWIS</names>
							<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=54858&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/amntrans/pta/2derby2.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="2083">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker>ADV MPSHE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman - thank you members of the Committee, we are ready to begin.  Mr Chairman, we are still in the hands of my learned friends on the other side Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, members of the Committee, the next witness will be Mrs Gaye, Derby-Lewis.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker>GAYE DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, you may be seated.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker>EXAMINATION BY MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Mrs Derby-Lewis, you are the wife of the applicant Mr Clive  Derby-Lewis?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Is it correct that on the 21st of April 1993, you were arrested at your home in connection with the matter which is now being heard by the Committee?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Is it also correct that you were - on the 21st of April, you were detained in terms of Section 29 of the Internal Security Act?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And after your detention in terms of the Act, you were subsequently charged together with the two applicants, Mr Clive Derby-Lewis and Mr  Walus?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Is it also correct that you appeared in the Supreme Court in Johannesburg - together with the two applicants, on charges relating to the death of Mr Chris Hani as well as other related charges?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Is it also correct that you were subsequently acquitted by his Lordship Mr Justice Eloff - in this matter?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, Mr Clive Derby Lewis - your husband, was arrested prior to your detention on the 21st of April?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, Mrs Derby-Lewis, is it correct that you were previously a member of the Nationalist Party?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Approximately when was this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>I joined the Nationalist Party in 1975, which was the time that I became a South African citizen.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>For how long were you a member of the Nationalist Party?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>I was a member of the National Party until 1979 when I handed in my resignation because of the change of their policies.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Were you also - during the your membership of the Nationalist Party, employed by the Department of Information?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>At that stage - the late Mr Connie Mulder, was he a member of the Nationalist Party?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he was a Cabinet Minister, he was the Minister of Information.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>For how long were you employed by the Department of Information?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>For approximately three and a half years.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And after that, did you become involved in the Conservative Party?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I remained outside politics since the time that I left the National Party and I was a founder member of the Conservative Party.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And your husband, Mr Derby-Lewis?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>When did you meet him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>I met him in the Conservative Party and we were married in 1986.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, in as far as your - what was your - did you occupy a particular office in the Conservative Party?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Well, I occupied statutory positions and I was also an employee.  In the statutory side, I was member of the &quot;Dag Bestuur&quot;, which is the Executive Council of the Transvaal, I was a member of the &quot;Hoof Raad&quot;, which is the Head Council, I was a member of the Information Committee and various other Committees.   All of these were - I was elected to these positions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>When did you commence that position as the Editor of The Patriot?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>1987.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And since when were you a member of the &quot;Dag Bestuur&quot; - as you refer to it, of the Conservative Party?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Well, I was elected to that position - basically from the word go, every year from 1982, 1983 until the time that I was incarcerated.  In other words, there were annual elections and I was elected just about every year to those positions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did you attend official meetings of the Conservative Party?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Are you referring to public meetings or meetings of the Committee - meetings of the officials?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>First of all, public meetings?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And meetings of the officials?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Was that on a regular basis?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>The Conservative Party always believed in elections of course, there was a programme of principles and policy and these were ratified every year at various congresses.  In 1987, the Conservative Party became the official opposition and we felt confident that by 1989 we would at least have some kind of power.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Will you just go a bit slower please?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Sorry.  Became one of despair and despite the fact that Mr de Klerk had promised to go back to the electorate before he brought in a new Constitution, he did do that and the climate in 1992 for example, was one of violence on both sides and an attitude within ourselves of: &quot;What are we going to do to stop the treason&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="61">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="62">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>We handed in to the Committee a selection of quotes from The Patriot, where it was quite clear that some kind of drastic action would have to be done to stop what we saw coming and which eventually did come.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="63">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And what did you see, what was coming - as you referred to?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="64">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Well, we saw the ANC and the Communist Party taking over.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="65">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did the Conservative Party regard the ANC and the SACP as a threat or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="66">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="67">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>What was your relationship with the late Doctor Andries Treurnicht?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="68">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Both my husband and I had a fairly close relationship on a personal level.  We were English speaking people and Clive had stood the 1984 election in Rosettenville and Doctor Treurnicht had asked him to stand there to test the urban English support and we got to know him fairly well.   He represented to us the sort of person we wanted to follow.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="69">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>At what level or to what extent was there any support for the Conservative Party at the time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="70">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="71">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>What position did you husband Mr Derby-Lewis, occupy in the Conservative Party?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="72">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Well, my husband was on all of the Committees that I was on, he was also - after 1987, a caucus member and he was an official opposition shadow spokesman on economic affairs and was part of the policy making body.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="73">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>How was he regarded and received or accepted by the public at large in as far as the Conservative Party was concerned?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="74">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="75">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now Mrs Derby-Lewis, in this trial of the late Mr Chris Hani, there was reference made to a list that was drawn up and sent to a Mr Arthur Kemp.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="76">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="77">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And by whom was that list - that was sent to Mr Arthur Kemp, compiled?MRS DERBY-LEWIS:   I compiled that list.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="78">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, this particular list that you referred to which you compiled - I refer Mr Chairman, to the record - the transcript of the case record, volume two and the reference to page 82 where the list of names appear.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="79">
			<speaker>JUDGE WILSON</speaker>
			<text>Which is the transcript, volume what?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="80">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="81">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="82">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>...[indistinct]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="83">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="84">
			<speaker>JUDGE WILSON</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="85">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>I beg your pardon Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="86">
			<speaker>JUDGE WILSON</speaker>
			<text>It is found in the large file.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="87">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="88">
			<speaker>JUDGE WILSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="89">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Reply to the request for further and better particulars&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="90">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>and then a list of names.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="91">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="92">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, please.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="93">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="94">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Mrs Derby-Lewis, in front of you now - at page 82 of the record, is a list of names.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="95">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="96">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Would you look at it please?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="97">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="98">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Is this the list of names which you compiled and submitted to Mr Arthur Kemp?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="99">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="100">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Will you please tell the Committee who is Mr Arthur Kemp?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="101">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Arthur Kemp is an old friend of mine, he is a journalist - a fellow journalist.   I met him in the Conservative Party and he also worked for The Patriot.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="102">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	He also helped me in the 1987 elections in Hillbrow and we were personal friends - he and his family.  He also was a journalist of great perspicacity who was always willing to help me and he worked at The Citizen after leaving The Patriot.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="103">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Is it also correct that Mr Kemp was a former member of the South African Police - at that stage, the security branch?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="104">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="105">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mrs Derby-Lewis, when did you submit this list to Mr Arthur Kemp?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="106">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="107">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And where did you fax it to - to his home?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="108">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>I faxed it to The Citizen on an open fax - Citizen newspaper.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="109">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>This particular list, was it hand-written or was it typed or ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="110">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No, it was typed on my computer and it was still on my computer when the police came to my house on the 17th of April and took the computers.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="111">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, for what reason did you send the list to Mr Kemp and what did you require - will you please tell the Committee?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="112">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="113">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I had written quite a few of them and at one stage I wrote an article about a Mr Nelson Mandela and Mrs Winnie Mandela - after information I had received from somebody in the Receiver of Revenue, that they were not being assessed for tax, which I considered to be something of public interest.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="114">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I checked out the documents that I had with somebody who was a tax expert and they confirmed the veracity of it and I wrote an article in The Patriot which was approved by the Conservative Party: Do Nelson and Winnie Pay Tax? - I have a copy of that here for the Committee if they wish.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="115">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="116">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="117">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="118">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="119">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="120">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="121">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="122">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	So I phoned up Doctor Ferdie Hartzenberg and I said I had this information and would he like to see it because he was due to make a speech in Parliament at the opening of Parliament in 1993 and seeing that Mr de Klerk was going to hand over to the ANC, perhaps it would be of interest to the public to find out how they managed their own affairs because they were ultimately going to manage the affairs of South Africa.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="123">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	He said: &quot;Yes&quot; and concomitant with that I got a whole lot of names, some journalists as well.  The reason why I got the journalists is because there were at least three of them from the Afrikaans press that I could not believe that they could write what they wrote in terms of being Afrikaners and in terms of trying to protect their heritage.  I bring this up because I now move on to another  ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="124">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Just a moment Mrs Derby-Lewis ..[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="125">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, one thing is leading to another - you must lead me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="126">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, I would like to present to the Committee, a document referred to by Mrs Derby-Lewis.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="127">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Will you please identify this document which you referred to which was taken off a  computer as you referred to in your evidence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="128">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, this is the document.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="129">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Is that the original document?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="130">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>This is the original document - this was taken off the computer and it was summarised for me and this was the document that I gave Doctor Hartzenberg - which I placed on his desk, in parliament.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="131">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>It will be referred to as Exhibit R, with your permission Mr Chairman.  The copies ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="132">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Very well, it will go in as Exhibit R.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="133">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mrs Derby-Lewis, in as far as your conversation with Mr Ferdie Hartzenberg is concerned, at the time - with regard to this information, did you diarise it in your diary?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="134">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="135">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Can I show you an extract from the diary?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="136">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="137">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="138">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>February the 9th ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="139">
			<speaker>JUDGE WILSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="140">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, to the best of my recollection, the last exhibit was P - I beg your pardon, Q.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="141">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Q.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="142">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Q was the last exhibit.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="143">
			<speaker>JUDGE WILSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="144">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="145">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="146">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="147">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="148">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="149">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>T, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="150">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And Mrs Derby-Lewis - the extract of her diary will be Exhibit S.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="151">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>As it pleases.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="152">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now Mrs Derby-Lewis, Exhibit S which an extract from your diary, will you please indicate to the Committee the relevant entry which you referred to when - which you had to speak to Mr Hartzenberg again in order to remind him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="153">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="154">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	&quot;Ferdie re ANC info - when needed&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="155">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>That appears on the left side of the page.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="156">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>About five lines from the bottom.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="157">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Five lines of the written lines.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="158">
			<speaker>JUDGE WILSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="159">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="160">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="161">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="162">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now Mrs Derby-Lewis, when you say: &quot;Operation Vula&quot;, what was that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="163">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Well, &quot;Operation Vula&quot; was the - I think it was a plan for an uprising which had been - was planned after the unbanning of the ANC, which was strange to many of us because after having being unbanned, clearly the path to power was open.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="164">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>An uprising of what nature are you referring to?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="165">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="166">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="167">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mrs Derby-Lewis, will you please tell the Committee if any of the names of the people allegedly involved in &quot;Operation Vula&quot; appears on this list and if so, whose names?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="168">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="169">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="170">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="171">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="172">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="173">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="174">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="175">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="176">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="177">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	He was a particularly active person and I went to listen to him once at Wits University and I found that this type of activism contrasted with my idea of what a Judge should be.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="178">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mrs Derby-Lewis, the names that appear on the list, Ken Owen, Karen Bruinhard, Wepener, John Kwelane, Tim du Plessis?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="179">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="180">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And Mr - the name Niehaus?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="181">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="182">
			<speaker>JUDGE WILSON</speaker>
			<text>What sort of people were they?  What did they do?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="183">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Niehaus and Mr Grosskopf - I see politics as one of nationalism and to actually actively work against the survival of your own people, I found strange.  It may not be the kind of opinion that everybody agrees with but this is what I found strange.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="184">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, Mr Niehaus and Mr Grosskopf, were they members of any political party as far you know?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="185">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="186">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And in as far as the person Boesak is concerned?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="187">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="188">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, Mr Pik Botha, is that the former Minister ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="189">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Minister of - yes, of Foreign Affairs.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="190">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And the person Jordan?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="191">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="192">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="193">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>I asked Mr Kemp if he knew - if he any information as to their addresses and the type of houses that they lived in.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="194">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And why did you require their addresses and the type of houses they lived in - that information?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="195">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="196">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="197">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible] 6 in bundle B.  May we ask that we are spared the expense and the volume.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="198">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>They say this is a different document Mr Bizos.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="199">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Oh, this is headed: JHB today?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="200">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No, this is a different page.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="201">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Just a moment.  Now, Mrs Derby-Lewis, Exhibit U which has now been presented to the Committee, what page are you referring to?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="202">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="203">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="204">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	And I would refer the Committee to this particular page where he writes about how a Russian agent used a journalist for political means and he says: </text>
		</line>
		<line number="205">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="206">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="207">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>What paragraph are you referring to?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="208">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="209" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;While courting Thomas, Lefchenko searched for ways to arouse in him, one or more of the motivations of mice, money, ideology, compromise, ego&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="210">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>And further down:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="211" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;The upkeep of his house photographed earlier on by a residency agent also cost him substantially&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="212">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="213">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, Mrs Derby-Lewis, journalists at large, do they receive good salaries or what?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="214">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No, journalists at large are poorly paid and are substantially susceptible to bribery and I refer to the submissions to the Truth Commission recently - within the last couple of months.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="215">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	If the Amnesty Committee would like, I can give them documentation by journalists in the journalistic profession in general, where it was stated that more than half the journalists in South Africa were on the pay of somebody, some organisation and it was quite surprising to see who was.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="216">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>A journalist is the sort of person who can ask more questions than even a policeman, so a journalist is quite influential and I think if I refer to the document that Mr Bizos handed in about Mr Kemp and his relationship with Mr Pieterse ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="217">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Are you referring to a statement?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="218">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="219">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="220" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;The Death of Chris Hani&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="221">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="222">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="223">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>As it pleases Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="224" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Exhibit V Mrs Derby-Lewis.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="225">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="226">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>You make mention to a Mr Pieterse, to what particular passage in this statement are you referring to?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="227">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Paragraph 3.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="228">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="229">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Page one.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="230">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Will you please read it to the Committee.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="231">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="232" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Information corresponding to the so-called hit-list found in the flat of Walus was reported to division 052 by agent Z0066 (Jerry Pieterse who fronted as a freelance reporter) who received it from sub-source 46 (Arthur Kemp) who was not aware of his link to NIS through Pieterse, not was he a registered agent of NIS.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="233">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Pieterse was handled as a principal agent who ran his own network of sub-sources, mainly journalists or stringers for major national and international newspapers.  The sub-sources communicated their newspaper type reports to Pieterse by computer&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="234">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="235">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="236">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="237">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And who was this man?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="238">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Steven Laufer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="239">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, for the purposes of the record, I am informed that this document was handed to us at the pre-trial conference by the representative of the Commission Mr Chairman and a copy was also handed to counsel for the witnesses.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="240">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="241">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Are you talking about Exhibit V?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="242">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Exhibit V.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="243">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="244">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="245">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="246">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="247">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>All this is in an endeavour to explain why your list had on it names of certain journalists?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="248">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="249">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="250">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mrs Derby-Lewis, Mr Arthur Kemp, is he still in South Africa?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="251">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Kemp is in England, he left with his wife and children, he immigrated.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="252">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, Exhibit T you referred to earlier, that is the document that contains a lot of information as you indicated members of the ANC, what was the significance of Exhibit T to you at the time when you received it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="253">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="254" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="255">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Was the salaries these people received, of any significance to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="256">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, there was a list of salaries and there were people here who were getting R2.500-00 a  month and living in rather luxurious houses.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="257">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>The salaries which is reflected on this document, would you describe that as a good salary, a poor salary or what?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="258">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Well, for example, Mr Steve Twete was getting R3.500-00, Mr Chris Hani was getting R3.500-00, Mr Max Sesulu was getting R5.000-00 etc., to me these were market related salaries at the time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="259">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>These names that appear on the list of Exhibit T, do some of these names also appear on the list which you sent to Mr Kemp or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="260">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="261">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Was there any relation between the list Exhibit T or this document and the list you requested information of from Mr Kemp?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="262">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, there were some of the names.  Joe Slovo was there, Ronnie Kasserels was there, Mr Hani was there, Mr Mandela was there - I think that was about all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="263">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Was there any connection between this list - this document, Exhibit T and the information you required?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="264">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Oh yes, sorry Mr Jordan was there, Mr Carl Niehaus was there.  Yes, because there were salaries mentioned here and in the light of my continuing articles, I found this of great interest.  I thought maybe I would gain something from finding out whether they were indeed living in fairly luxurious surrounding.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="265">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>If you did find they were living in luxurious surroundings, what would you have done? - with the list and ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="266">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="267">
			<speaker>JUDGE WILSON</speaker>
			<text>What do you mean: &quot;At the last minute&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="268">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="269">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="270">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And that particular bus station, where is it situated?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="271">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>That was the Rotunda.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="272">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Is that in Johannesburg?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="273">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="274">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And did you then meet Mr Kemp at the Rotunda bus station?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="275">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="276">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And on that particular day, what transpired between you and Mr Kemp?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="277">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="278">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="279">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="280">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What page?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="281">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="282">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, please do.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="283">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mrs Derby-Lewis, I now show you page 411, 410 and 409, do you recognise these documents?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="284">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="285">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>What are these documents, these three pages?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="286">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>These are the pages of what Mr Kemp had given me in the envelope.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="287">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Is this what was referred to in the trial in the Supreme Court as the list?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="288">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>That is what is referred to as the list.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="289">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And if you look at page 411, what appears on this page?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="290">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="291">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Then page 410 - I beg your pardon, let me go to page 409 first.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="292">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="293">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>But is there a description?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="294">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>There a description, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="295">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="296">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="297">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, Mrs Derby-Lewis, when you received this list from Mr Kemp, did the writing that appears on page 410 alongside the names, was it there on the list?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="298">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="299">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="300">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="301">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="302">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="303">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did you write on this list?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="304">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="305">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Is this your handwriting?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="306">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="307">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>From your personal knowledge, do you know who wrote this - from what you know personally, not what you heard - on this list?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="308">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="309">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="310">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="311">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And after you received this list, what did you do with it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="312">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Well, he gave it to me in an envelope and I just put it in my handbag and boarded the bus.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="313">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I think he wants to know what did you do with the list.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="314">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Where did you take it, what did you do with it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="315">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Oh, I took it to Cape Town with me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="316">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Yes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="317">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>And my husband met me at the airport and we went back to Parliament because I had to unload the computer equipment ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="318">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Can we shorten ...[inaudible]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="319">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="320">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible] what you did with the document in ...[inaudible] the steps you took to deal with the document.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="321">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Certainly.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="322">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>So you took the document ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="323">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="324">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, and then?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="325">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="326">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  According to the evidence, this list - Exhibit, landed up in the hands of Mr Walus and was found by the police at his flat?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="327">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="328">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>According to the evidence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="329">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="330">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did you give this list to Mr Walus?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="331">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="332">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did you give it to your husband?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="333">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="334">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And as it emerged from the evidence now before the Committee, it was handed by your husband to Mr Walus?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="335">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="336">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did you know about that at the time when it was handed over?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="337">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="338">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, on the 10th of April 1993 - correct, there was information on the radio etc., and information was received that Mr Hani was assassinated at his house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="339">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="340">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And on that particular day, where were you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="341">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>I was at the house of Mr and Mrs Venter, we had arranged to meet sometime before that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="342">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And was your husband present?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="343">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>He was, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="344">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And was the information that was conveyed to you by Mrs Venter with regard to the assassination of Mr Hani?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="345">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, she answered the phone.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="346">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, on the 12th of April, did you see Mr Kemp on that day?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="347">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="348">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, was there reference made to Mr Kemp with regard to this list or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="349">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="350">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did it emerge - in your conversation, did the list that was referred to in The Beeld newspaper, was actually the list that you received from Mr Kemp?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="351">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="352">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>But it later transpired to be the same list or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="353">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>It did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="354">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And did you discuss this matter with your husband - with regard to the list on the 12th of April?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="355">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="356">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And what did he say and what did you say?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="357">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Well, I said to him: &quot;How did it get into the hands of Mr Walus&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="358">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Yes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="359">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>And he told me that he had given it to him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="360">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And at the trial, what was your evidence with regard to the handing over of the list to Mr - with regard to the list?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="361">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>I would like to mention that at the trial, I ...[inaudible] sorry, I prevaricated on that matter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="362">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>What do you mean by that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="363">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Prevaricated - I ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="364">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Deviated from the truth.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="365">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="366">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>When Mr Kemp compiled the short list that was referred to now in Exhibit R4, pages 409 to 411, did you in any way assist him or tell him what names to put on that list?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="367">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="368">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="369">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>So he actually in effect compiled the list according to his - to the availability of the information.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="370">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>So, you had not assisted him in any way or told as to how to compile that list?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="371">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="372">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="373">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No, no.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="374">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And did you at any stage conspire with Mr Kemp in order to draw up a list to be used as a hit-list to kill Mr Hani or any other person appearing on that list?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="375">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="376">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did you - at the time when the list was received and left on the table prior to the death of Mr Hani, did you know that your husband and Mr Walus intended assassinating Mr Hani?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="377">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="378">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did you know that your husband or Mr Walus intended using that list?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="379">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="380">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Prior to that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="381">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="382">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>If I understand your evidence correctly, this only came to your knowledge subsequent to the assassination of Mr Hani?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="383">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, on the 12th of April.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="384">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>The 12th of April.  Now, in as far as the evidence is concerned, there was evidence made at the trial of a ZA8 pistol that was used by Mr Walus - the applicant in this matter, to assassinate Mr Hani with that weapon, did you know anything about that weapon?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="385">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Absolutely nothing.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="386">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did you see that weapon prior to the trial?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="387">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="388">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Or any prior stage?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="389">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="390">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did you know that your husband Mr Clive Derby-Lewis, had acquired that particular weapon from a Mr Faan Venter or anybody?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="391">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="392">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And did you know that your husband had a silencer fitted to that weapon?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="393">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="394">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>I would like to ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="395">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Hang on just a moment.   Did you know what a silencer is?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="396">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="397">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="398">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="399">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, with the permission of the Commission, I would like to refer to this inventory as Exhibit W.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="400">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="401">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="402">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>I refer you to page 3, third line from the top, would you look at that please?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="403">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="404">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>What is written there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="405">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="406" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Spare bedroom: Stepson - one written A4 document, 1.22 silencer&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="407">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, when that list was compiled, did you see this item?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="408">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="409">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	There was and Mr Gus Sunde - S-u-n-d-e, whose name appears as actually number one on the front page of the policeman attending and I spoke to him and I said: &quot;What is that&quot;? and he said: &quot;That is a silencer&quot;.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="410">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I had never in my life seen a silencer before that moment, the silencer belonged to my son and it had been lying at the bottom of his cupboard downstairs and I indicate to you that I had never ever seen a silencer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="411">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mrs Derby-Lewis, prior to the assassination of Mr Hani on the 6th of April, is it correct that Mr Walus attended breakfast in your residence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="412">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, on the 6th of April.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="413">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And was this diarised in your diary that a breakfast had to be held or ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="414">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="415">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>So it was diarised and did Mr Walus then show up on that particular day for breakfast?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="416">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="417">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And did you attend this breakfast?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="418">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No, I cooked the breakfast I think, the maid helped me and then I went - I left the house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="419">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>So, were you present on that particular day when breakfast was served or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="420">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="421">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, according to the evidence of your housemaid Elizabeth, she testified that you were not present during that breakfast, would that be correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="422">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="423">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Do you know what was discussed on that particular day between your husband and Mr Walus?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="424">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="425">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, Mr Walus - at that stage, was he well known to you or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="426">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="427">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, Mr Walus, was he well versed in the English language or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="428">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="429">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, it is alleged during this Commission that you were involved in a conspiracy to murder Mr Chris Hani, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="430">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="431">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="432">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="433">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did you at any stage - prior to the assassination of Mr Chris Hani, discuss with Mr Venter anything in order to assassinate Mr Hani?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="434">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="435">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Or any person on that list?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="436">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="437">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Keith Darrel, is he known to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="438">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="439">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did you have any discussions or where you present or did you know about any discussions prior to the assassination of Mr Keith Darrel with regard to fitting a silencer or getting a silencer fitted or the assassination of Mr Hani?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="440">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="441">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Lionel Durandt. did you know him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="442">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, Mr and Mrs Durandt were political colleagues and friends from Krugersdorp.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="443">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And did you ever discuss anything with Mr Lionel Durandt or his wife with regard to obtaining a gun or the delivery of a gun?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="444">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="445">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did you have any knowledge or not that a gun was delivered by Mr Lionel Durandt or received and delivered to your husband?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="446">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="447">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, - just a moment Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="448">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Now, Mrs Derby-Lewis, Mr Edwin Clarke, could you please tell the Committee where did you meet him and how well did you know him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="449">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Edwin Clarke lived close by and we met - of course like all the other people, in politics.  He was a member of the Conservative party, he was a computer fundi and he used to come to the house occasionally to fix our computers.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="450">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And do you know where Mr Clarke is at the moment?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="451">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Well, I believe he lives on a plot and when you want to contact him, you can leave a message and in fact he came to my house four or five days ago and gave me a new screen for my computer.  I did leave a message with him, he phoned back and I told him that I was having trouble with the screen and he brought the screen.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="452">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>So, he could be contacted telephonically?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="453">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I can just leave a message.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="454">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And do you know a person by the name of Mr Visser?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="455">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Which Mr Visser?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="456">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="457">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="458">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  Now, his name is Johannes Nicholas Visser.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="459">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="460">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="461">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="462">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="463">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Well, I know nothing about that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="464">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Do you know how - who paid for the defence of Mr Walus?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="465">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>When we were arrested - the three of us, the Conservative Party immediately organised a defence fund.  A list was drawn up and the wording of that list was drawn by Mr Tom Langley who was an Advocate and the Conservative Party list was distributed throughout the membership of the Party and they contributed to our legal funds.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="466">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, Mr Tom Langley, was he also at that stage a member of the Conservative Party?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="467">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="468">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>What was his position in the Conservative Party?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="469">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>He was a spokesman on foreign affairs, he was a member of - the same level as Clive, a member of the General Council and so forth.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="470">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And Dillis van Straaten?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="471">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="472">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Was she known to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="473">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="474">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="475">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="476">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="477">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="478">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>ON RESUMPTION</text>
		</line>
		<line number="479">
			<speaker>GAY DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>(s.u.o.)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="480">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="481">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>May I proceed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="482">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="483">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="484">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="485">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="486">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>The whole list or part of it or what?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="487">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No, just the top page.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="488">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="489">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="490">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Are you aware there were people - foreigners, who also assisted in this investigation - a certain Mr Kooimans?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="491">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Which investigation are you referring to?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="492">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>This recent investigation of the Committee.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="493">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="494">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Are you aware or first of all, can I put it to you this way - there was a report in The Report newspaper of an investigation that was conducted pertaining to a so-called broad conspiracy and other related matters?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="495">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="496">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And pursuant to that, did you enquire from The Report newspaper as to where that information emanated from and what it consisted of?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="497">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="498">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="499">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="500">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, since ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="501">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, that was on the 4th of November 1997</text>
		</line>
		<line number="502" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Dear Mrs Lewis,</text>
		</line>
		<line number="503">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>I refer to your fax of 4th of November regarding certain information.  Any information that report may have received on the Hani investigation is a confidential matter between the newspaper and the source, therefore we are unable to assist you in this matter&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="504">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mrs Derby-Lewis, subsequent to that, did you receive any documentation in the post?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="505">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I did.  I received three reports in the post addressed to my P.O. box.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="506">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="507">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mrs Derby-Lewis, first of all, if you look at Exhibit X1, X2 and X3, are these the documents you received in the post or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="508">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="509">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, these documents, to what do they refer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="510">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Well, the ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="511">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Start off with Exhibit X1.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="512">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>The first one is a memorandum to Advocate Koki Mpshe from a Wilson Magatla, subject: &quot;Chris Hani Investigation&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="513">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Yes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="514">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Of course, when I got this I went through it and I would like to lay before the Committee some points that I have taken from this.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="515">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  Now, continue.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="516">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="517">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="518">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="519">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="520">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Well, ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="521">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>In as far as this documentation is concerned Mrs Derby-Lewis, is there any evidence which indicates that you were involved in this conspiracy?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="522">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="523">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="524">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>You mean besides Mr Lewis and Mr Walus?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="525">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="526">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="527">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And does that refer - is that with reference to X1?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="528">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="529">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And as far as X2 is concerned?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="530">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="531">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Well, I would like to apologise.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="532">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Just carry on.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="533">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="534">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="535">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, my views of the contents of the documents of page 9 of Exhibit X1, the second last paragraph.  They refer to the fact that the interrogation was secretly recorded on video tape and is available.  I just want to place before the Committee that we battled to get these tapes and quite clearly, these tapes have been available to the TRC for some time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="536">
			<speaker>JUDGE WILSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="537">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Well, with respect Mr Chairman ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="538">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>I beg your pardon Mr ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="539">
			<speaker>JUDGE WILSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="540">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman with respect, as far as the video tape is concerned, the witness is referring to the aspect that there was a recording made of the visit by the legal representative of these people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="541">
			<speaker>JUDGE WILSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="542">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="543">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="544">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, the point that is to be made at page 9, the second to last paragraph</text>
		</line>
		<line number="545" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;The interrogation was secretly recorded on video tape and is available&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="546">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="547">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Is that the whole purpose of this document?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="548">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="549">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Is there anything else to be derived from this document?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="550">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, yes - no, not this - yes, this one page 13 - as Mr Prinsloo said about the conclusion arrived at.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="551">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="552">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I understand that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="553">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="554">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Will you please refer to that Mrs Derby-Lewis?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="555">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="556">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Are you referring to the section that starts</text>
		</line>
		<line number="557" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Tinnie Groenewald and ...[indistinct] Bishoff were occupying offices in Hatfield Pretoria at the time, where they were preparing for a war against the ANC.  The assassination of political leaders was high on their agenda&quot; ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="558">
			<speaker>JUDGE WILSON</speaker>
			<text>Where is it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="559">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="560">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, carry on.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="561">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR PRINSLOO</text>
		</line>
		<line number="562" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="563">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Is that the passage you want to refer the Committee to Mrs Derby-Lewis?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="564">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="565">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And then the last page - I beg your pardon, the second to last page</text>
		</line>
		<line number="566" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="567">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Is there anything else you would like to refer to Mrs Derby-Lewis?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="568">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No, not with those reports.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="569">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And the reports as handed in Exhibits X1, X2, and X3.  The letter which was written to The Report newspaper ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="570">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Are you dealing with X3 now?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="571">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>X4, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="572">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="573">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="574">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I see.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="575">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="576">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Do carry on with X4.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="577">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>X4 ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="578">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="579">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>The letter written by yourself Mrs Derby-Lewis, is the letter which is part of X4?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="580">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="581">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And the date of that letter?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="582">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>The 4th of November 1997.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="583">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And what did you request in the letter?  Would you please read it out to the Committee?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="584">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="585" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;On Sunday, the 5th of October, Report carried a front page story concerning a TRC investigative report into the Hani case.  This report had apparently been leaked to Report.  Our legal team has been trying to get a copy of this report since early June, to no avail.  Our attorney has again written to the TRC last week asking for copy.  In the meantime, would it be possible for us to obtain a copy of the report in your possession.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="586">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="587">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And X5 is the letter which was received from the Committee?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="588">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="589" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;The report is not yet completed.  I had a meeting with the Deputy Head of our Investigative Unit, Mr Wilson Magatla on the 5th of November, he told me that the conspiracy issue is still being investigated.  He has actually left Cape Town to discuss/consult with certain person&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="590">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="591">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Well, they were supportive.  During my interrogation with Mr Deetleffs, I asked a question of him</text>
		</line>
		<line number="592" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;What was the Conservative Party doing&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="593">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>and his answer was: </text>
		</line>
		<line number="594" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="595">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="596">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did you at any stage - subsequent to your release from prison before the trial or thereafter, did you attend meetings of the Conservative Party?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="597">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, after I was granted bail in the middle of August, I attended various congresses of the Conservative Party.  This did not infringe my bail conditions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="598">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And how were you received by the Conservative Party?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="599">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="600">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="601">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="602">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, Mrs Derby-Lewis, you were arrested on the 21st of April 1993, at four in the morning, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="603">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="604">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did you request the police or not, to contact an attorney at that stage?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="605">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="606">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>How did you do it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="607">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="608" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Well, under what Act are you arresting me&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="609">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="610" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Can I please contact an attorney&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="611">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>and he said: </text>
		</line>
		<line number="612" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="613">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>There was somebody staying in the house at the time, and I asked them to contact Advocate Jeug Prinsloo who was the Conservative Party member of Parliament for Roodepoort.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="614">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	And then I said to Mr Deetleffs: </text>
		</line>
		<line number="615" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Where are you taking me&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="616">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>and he said: </text>
		</line>
		<line number="617" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Krugersdorp&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="618">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>So then I told Advocate Prinsloo that I would be going to Krugersdorp.  As it subsequently turned out, they just dropped off a book or something in Krugersdorp and took me to Benoni, so there was a bit of a wild goose chase for attorneys to find out where I was after that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="619">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did you arrive during the morning at the Benoni Police Station?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="620">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="621">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>At the Benoni Police Station, would you please tell the Commission what transpired then, what took place?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="622">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Well, I was taken to a room and I was left sitting there for a few hours and then Captain Nick Deetleffs came in and he said to me</text>
		</line>
		<line number="623" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;You are guilty and you will get 15 years&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="624">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>and I said: </text>
		</line>
		<line number="625" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="626">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>and he said: </text>
		</line>
		<line number="627" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I can keep you here as long as I want and you will tell me the truth&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="628">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>and quite a few other threats.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="629">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Were you afforded the opportunity - did you ask Captain Deetleffs or anyone there at that stage to contact your attorney or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="630">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I asked him if he would contact Advocate Prinsloo and I gave the number.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="631">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did he contact Advocate Prinsloo?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="632">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="633">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did you at any stage ask Captain Deetleffs or not, as to whether an attorney had arrived or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="634">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, continuously throughout the morning I asked him</text>
		</line>
		<line number="635" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Where was my attorney&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="636">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>and he kept saying: </text>
		</line>
		<line number="637" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="638">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And did your attorney arrive?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="639">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="640">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did you at any stage during that day, have access to your attorney?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="641">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="642">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>So, you were not assisted by an attorney at all?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="643">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="644">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And during the course of that morning, did Captain Deetleffs obtain a statement from you or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="645">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No, Captain Deetleffs said that he would write a statement which I should sign.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="646">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Was that the same day?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="647">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that was in the morning some time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="648">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>At that stage, were you held under Section 29 or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="649">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="650">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="651">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mrs Derby-Lewis, at your residence at the time of your arrest or thereafter at your residence, did Captain Deetleffs warn you in terms of Judges Rules? - that is that you were not obliged to make a statement and whatever you would say would be taken down in writing etc.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="652">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No, not that I can remember.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="653">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And at the police station, did Captain Deetleffs warn you in terms of Judges Rules before recording any statement?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="654">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No, on the contrary, he threatened me, he was most abusive and he said that he would keep me there until I wrote the truth.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="655">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="656" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I sent a list of names by facsimile&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="657">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="658">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Let me rephrase the question on this basis, did you state the answer</text>
		</line>
		<line number="659" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I say nothing&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="660">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="661">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="662">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="663" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I want to see an attorney and therefore I cannot comment on what you are saying because I need some legal advice&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="664">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And was this procedure followed throughout the statement which comprises of page 395, 396 up to page 397?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="665">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="666">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And your replies to each of these questions which appear on page 395, 396, 397, are those the answers you gave in response to that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="667">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="668" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;No comment&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="669">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>or:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="670" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="671">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Later on during that day, were you detained in terms of Section 29 of the Internal Security Act?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="672">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="673">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, who informed you as to the provisions of that particular Section?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="674">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Colonel van Niekerk.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="675">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>What did he say to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="676">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="677" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;What does that mean&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="678">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="679" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Isolation and no access to attorneys&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="680">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="681">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And did he say anything else or what would be the purpose of this?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="682">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="683" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="684">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>and I subsequently discovered that they had arrived an hour before.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="685">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did your attorney then see you subsequent to that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="686">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="687">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mrs Derby-Lewis, after you were placed in detention in terms of Section 29, were you interrogated by any particular person or persons?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="688">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="689">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Was he assisted by anyone?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="690">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, there was a Warrant Officer Beetge who came in and out.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="691">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, subsequent to you being released from the provisions of Section 29 of the Internal Security Act, did you compile a note or notes pertaining to your experience whilst being detained in terms of Section 29?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="692">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  While I was under Section 29, I kept notes on pieces of paper which the police had given me - the police sergeant had given me.  I was very shocked at the system and I wanted to keep a note of it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="693">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>All I would like to know is - you made notes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="694">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="695">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, Mr Chairman, I would like to hand in as Exhibit Y as copies of the occurrence book which was kept at the Edenvale Police Station where the witness was detained.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="696">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What is the purpose of that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="697">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, the purpose will be that it will be referred to in evidence as to when she was detained, when she was taken out of the police station for the purpose of interrogation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="698">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Is that in dispute Mr Bizos?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="699">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, I would have thought that if we were asked - if we were given a list to check it but ...[indistinct] make an admission on one page but far be it for us to suggest how they should run their case.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="700">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="701">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="702">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="703">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, you may do so if it becomes relevant at that stage.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="704">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>As it pleases Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="705">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mrs Derby-Lewis, the document which you - you said you wrote a</text>
		</line>
		<line number="706">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>document whilst you were still in custody, after you were released from your detention in terms of Section 29 of the Internal Security Act.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="707">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I refer to you a document which will be referred to as Exhibit Y Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="708">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, are we going to have the original document - the notes that are said to have been done on pieces of paper?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="709">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="710">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Could we have the original as Exhibit Y please - handed in.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="711">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="712">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Has it been handed in already?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="713">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>No, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="714">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>All right, give us a description of these documents please.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="715">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, Exhibit Y1 which is the original which I will hand up to you Mr Chairman.  This document - the original is now handed up to the Committee.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="716">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mrs Derby-Lewis, this document Exhibit Y1, is it in your handwriting?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="717">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="718">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>When did you write this document?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="719">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>On the 2nd of May 1993.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="720">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And where were you at that stage?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="721">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="722">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And that particular document, does that relate to your treatment whilst detained in terms of Section 29?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="723">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="724">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And then Exhibit Y2 will be the original notes, is that correct Mrs Derby-Lewis?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="725">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="726">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="727">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="728">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>The notes of Y2 Mr Chairman, they are photostatted on separate pieces - on pages of paper together and Exhibit Y2 has now been handed up to the Committee.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="729">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What is Y2?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="730">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Y2 is the pieces of notes - original notes Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="731">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mrs Derby-Lewis, would you please read from Exhibit Y1 to the Committee?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="732">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>The whole matter - may I go ahead?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="733">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, you may.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="734">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="735" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;The whole matter has been highlighted by two elements as far as I can see, one to keep legal representation ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="736">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, are you going to ask your client to read this entire document?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="737">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="738">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="739">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="740">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mrs Derby-Lewis, for what purpose did you compile Exhibit Y1 - this document?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="741">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>I compiled it because of the experience that I had under Section 29, I wanted to keep records of what had happened to me and I based this on what I could remember and I based it on the notes that I had written while I was incarcerated.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="742">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And Mrs Derby-Lewis, in as far as your detention was concerned in terms of Section 29, what did you experience?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="743">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="744">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mrs Derby-Lewis, while you were detained in terms of Sections 29, did Captain Deetleffs or any other of the interrogators read your rights to you so to speak?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="745">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="746">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Inform you of Judges Rules and so on?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="747">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="748">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, Mrs Derby-Lewis, were you taken out of the cells on various occasions or not for the purposes of interrogation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="749">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="750">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And were taken out only in the daytime or night-time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="751">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>For the first couple of nights, I sat the whole night and after that I was taken out at various times during the day and sometimes left late at night and sometimes they collected me at night and I sat for hours at night and then came back quite late.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="752">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="753">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="754">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, if Captain Deetleffs had told you that you were not obliged to say anything, would it have made sense to you or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="755">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Well, that was the impression that I got, that one was considered innocent until proved guilty but his attitude was exactly the opposite.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="756" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;You must say that you are guilty and then we will let you go&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="757">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did he ask of you to supply information or to withhold information?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="758">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No, he asked me to supply information.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="759">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, on the 24th of April, there is a summary of notes which Captain Deetleffs made which is contained in 398 up till page 402 of Exhibit R4 continued, and that you had the opportunity since then to reconcile this with a video tape that was reportedly made on that particular day.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="760">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="761">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, what is recorded at page 398 up to 402, does it represent verbatim what you said on the video, or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="762">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="763">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>But in essence what is revealed in this particular document, pages 398 to 402, is that true or untrue?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="764">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="765">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>But this particular document, it was never signed by you was it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="766">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No, no.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="767">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And did you - up till now, was any original notes made available by the police as far as this statement is concerned?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="768">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="769">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>In as far as the list is concerned - during your interrogation by Mr Deetleffs, were you questioned about that as well?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="770">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, and I told him why I had drawn it up and he said</text>
		</line>
		<line number="771" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="772">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>and I said:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="773" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="774">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>It is on the tape actually.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="775">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>I refer you to page 398, paragraph 10, will you please read that to the Committee?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="776">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="777" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I one day made a list of people for an article, it consisted of people named in the Vula investigation, reporters as well as Judge Richard Goldstone&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="778">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And is that particular paragraph, is that a complete ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="779">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="780">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>response to what you told?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="781">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="782">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And also with reference to His Lordship Mr Justice Goldstone?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="783">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="784">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>What you said to Mr Deetleffs in this particular passage, does it - in as far as the list is concerned in essence, does it differ from your version in court or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="785">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="786">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, without going through the statement with regard to each and every particular paragraph here, did you - after being interrogated by Captain Deetleffs for a number of days, were you then interrogated by another person known as Captain de Waal?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="787">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="788">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	And on the 24th I wrote what I thought he wanted me to write but in effect it was basically all I had to say and I had nothing more to say than that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="789">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mrs Derby-Lewis, is it correct that the tape recordings - the video recordings were received which pertains to you, refers to - partially refers to pages 395 up till page 397 of R4 continued and 398 up till pages 402?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="790">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, the video tapes were of one or two hours in the morning of the 21st of April, then there was a blank and the video tape started again on the 24th, so the interrogatory period had been left out.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="791">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>You referred to in your evidence that abuse was shouted at you by Captain Deetleffs and swearing, does that appear on the video tapes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="792">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="793">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And when you were interrogated by Captain de Waal, did you see any video recordings with regard to that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="794">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No, there was a three day lapse between when I had written - what I wrote for or what I had said to Mr Deetleffs and then on the 27th - I was left for three days and then on the 27th I was asked to come to the Edenvale police station where there was obviously no video set-up to record people there and I was asked to start writing my statement by Captain de Waal.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="795">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>When you were interrogated by Captain Deetleffs, did you have an opportunity to read the Bible?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="796">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>I was given a Bible yes, by the police.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="797">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And did Captain Deetleffs pass any remarks with regard to reading the Bible or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="798">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="799">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="800">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="801">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And did - were you given reading material whilst detained ...[inaudible]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="802">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="803">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And whilst you were detained in terms of Section 29 initially by - the interrogation by Captain Deetleffs, were you at some stage ill or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="804">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, the sleep depravation caused disorientation and my heart started to give me trouble and I asked to see a surgeon - a doctor and I saw my own doctor in the company of the district surgeon and I was given treatment for it and subsequently had to take pills.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="805">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, when Captain de Waal started his interrogation of you, did he inform you in terms of Judges Rules that you were not obliged to make a statement?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="806">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="807">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Captain de Waal made a statement which is contained in the police docket, is that correct? - which you have had access to, a statement by Captain de Waal.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="808">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="809">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="810">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Are you calling him as a witness?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="811">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="812">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Well now, why do you want to hand it in if he may not be called as a witness?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="813">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Because Mr Chairman, he refers to certain particular aspects that he warned her in terms of Judges Rules and as to how he interrogated her and what transpired.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="814">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="815">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>I beg your pardon Mr Chairman?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="816">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Is it necessary to hand in the statement just for those purposes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="817">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Well, Mr Chairman, at least the Committee will then have a document in front of it as to what Captain de Waal said transpired as opposed to the witness says.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="818">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="819">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>I beg your pardon Sir?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="820">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>Were you not to hand this document to us now, would we still have it or have we already had it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="821">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman with respect, the Committee will not be informed as to what transpired.  At least information is now placed before the Committee as to what Captain de Waal says took place as opposed to what the witness says.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="822">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>Are you wanting to create an issue out of this statement?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="823">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Well, Mr Chairman, the issue is for the start, the witness has already testified that she was not warned in terms of Judges Rules as said by Captain de Waal in that particular statement and also the witness will also explain to the Committee as to what transpired between her and Captain de Waal when she wrote various statements as opposed to - for instance, her detention file Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="824">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="825">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>I beg your pardon?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="826">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="827">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman with respect, in view of the fact that we have to make a full disclosure, we make that disclosure of what Captain de Waal says.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="828">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Well, whatever Captain de Waal says in this statement, of what value is it without him coming to give that evidence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="829">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman with respect, this document was contained in the police docket.  As Mr Bizos handed in the statement of Captain Deetleffs, it will have the same significance.  If the Committee deem it appropriate to call Captain de Waal, it will be necessary then but if not - depending what the witness says.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="830">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="831">
			<speaker>JUDGE WILSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="832">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>I beg your pardon Mr Chairman?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="833">
			<speaker>JUDGE WILSON</speaker>
			<text>Does this statement that you want to hand in now, conflict with what Captain Deetleffs said.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="834">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, the version of the witness conflicts as to what Deetleffs recorded in his statement.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="835">
			<speaker>JUDGE WILSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="836">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="837">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>There must be some limit please, to try and hand in documents unless you are going to call a witness.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="838">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, in view of that I will not hand in the statements.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="839">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, you may take it back.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="840">
			<speaker>JUDGE WILSON</speaker>
			<text>You will of course be at liberty to use this statement if Captain de Waal comes to give evidence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="841">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="842">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Please proceed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="843">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Just a moment Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="844">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mrs Derby-Lewis, you made five statements whilst you were detained in terms of Section 29, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="845">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="846">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>The first statement was made on the 27th of April and it appears at pages 149 to 163 ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="847">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Just hold it, hold it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="848">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="849">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Pages what?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="850">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="851">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Right.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="852">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And then also a statement dated 27th of April, page 269 to 276 and a statement ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="853">
			<speaker>JUDGE WILSON</speaker>
			<text>Dated when?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="854">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>269 to 276 Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="855">
			<speaker>JUDGE WILSON</speaker>
			<text>Date?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="856">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>27th of April.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="857">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The same date?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="858">
			<speaker>JUDGE WILSON</speaker>
			<text>The same date?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="859">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="860">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="861">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="862">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The third one really - 28th of April ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="863">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="864">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What pages are those?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="865">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Pages 240 to 259.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="866">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, and the fourth one?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="867">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="868">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>On the same day two statements?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="869">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="870">
			<speaker>JUDGE WILSON</speaker>
			<text>What was the last page?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="871">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>289 Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="872">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="873">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="874">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And this was in your own handwriting?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="875">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="876">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>As it appears at page 164 onwards of the same statement which is hand-written and the introductory part of this statement at page 149 which follows, gives a background of your life and where you come from etc., is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="877">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="878">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And also information with regard to your involvement in the Department of Information and so on?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="879">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="880">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, at page 158, paragraph 65</text>
		</line>
		<line number="881" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Kuba and I and Clive discussed that something should be done to rid the country of the communists and terrorists, like many concerned people we saw no other option&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="882">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Is that correct, did you say that or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="883">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="884" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;To rid the country of the communists and terrorists&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="885">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>I remember in my taped recording which I saw the video tape of, after that when I was speaking to Mr de Waal - Mr Deetleffs, I said:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="886" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Well, we must get a homeland or something&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="887">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>In other words, it was simply a discussion of how we were going to avoid ANC rule.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="888">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mrs Derby-Lewis, paragraph 66 of the same page, bottom of the page - bottom of the paragraph at least</text>
		</line>
		<line number="889" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Clive informed me that he and Kuba were discussing someone&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="890">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>and over the page:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="891" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;on the list which I had obtained from Arthur Kemp.  Clive said he and Kuba had discussed eliminating someone because of his communistic associations&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="892">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Now, is that true or not and if it was said, when was it said to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="893">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No, that is not true.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="894">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And now, you wrote it, why did you write that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="895">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Because Mr de Waal told me to write it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="896">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And now, turning to paragraph 72 of page 159 - the typed statement, at the bottom of the paragraph</text>
		</line>
		<line number="897" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;It was obvious to me that Kuba had possibly done the deed and Clive and I later confirmed that Kuba had used the gun which Clive showed me one day in the house with a silencer.  Clive and I then left.  We were both of course shocked and the news and then went shopping&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="898">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Now, is that true or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="899">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="900">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Why did you write it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="901">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Because Mr de Waal told me to write it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="902">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Please, allow the witness to give evidence please.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="903">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	How much of that paragraph is not true?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="904">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="905" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;It was obvious to me&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="906">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>onwards, which is the second last line at the bottom of page 159.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="907">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, do carry on.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="908">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>If you look at paragraph 74 - 74, I beg your pardon, what part of that is correct or incorrect?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="909">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>The start</text>
		</line>
		<line number="910" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;In January 1993, I telephoned Arthur Kemp at The Citizen in Johannesburg and said I was going to send him a list of names and I wanted a description of their houses and their addresses&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="911">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="912" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;This was done after much serious thought and because Clive and I felt that unless something dramatic was done, the county would be controlled by communists.  Clive and I therefore highlighted the names of people whom we believed to be the enemies of South Africa.  Certain names were added to the list I sent to Arthur, such as Justice Goldstone and certain newspaper people&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="913">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="914" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="915">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>but I think in that context, certain names were added to the list.  What he means was that I composed a list of core names and then I just added some to pad it, that was how I read this particular statement.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="916">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And that is not correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="917">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>That is not correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="918">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, paragraph 74 on the same page, the last four lines</text>
		</line>
		<line number="919" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Clive and Kuba decided on Chris Hani to be eliminated because of his particularly brutal record and his position as Chairman of the South African Communist Party, which they believed never should have been unbanned&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="920">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>What do you say to that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="921">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="922">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Right, 75, did you write that - why did you say that, is it correct or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="923">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="924">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Paragraph 76?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="925">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Well, it says</text>
		</line>
		<line number="926" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="927">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The word: &quot;enemies&quot; was introduced by Mr Deetleffs during my first couple of days of interrogation, he basically - and it can be seen on the tapes, where he says:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="928" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Are they your enemies&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="929">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="930">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, paragraph 75, is that correct</text>
		</line>
		<line number="931" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="932">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="933">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And paragraph 76, what do you say to that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="934">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Well, it basically is a repeat of previous paragraphs where it says</text>
		</line>
		<line number="935" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Conversation between Clive and I often got around to what could be done to rid South Africa of the communists and terrorists&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="936">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="937">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So, that is correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="938">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="939">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, page 208, paragraph 80, the last three lines which starts</text>
		</line>
		<line number="940" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Clive then said that it appeared to him as if Kuba had been set up because it was a rather amateurish job and Kuba had not for example changed the number plates and so forth&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="941">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="942">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>161.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="943">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Where are you reading from?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="944">
			<speaker>JUDGE WILSON</speaker>
			<text>Paragraph 80.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="945">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="946">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="947">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="948">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>It should be 161.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="949">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="950">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="951">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, paragraph 81 starts</text>
		</line>
		<line number="952" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Clive and I both discussed how difficult it would be to actually go out and kill someone&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="953">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No, no.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="954">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR PRINSLOO</text>
		</line>
		<line number="955" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I asked Clive why he had become involved and he said Kuba had asked me in because he, Kuba, felt that something had to be done to stop the Government sell-out to the communists&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="956">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No, that is not correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="957">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And the last three lines of the same paragraph</text>
		</line>
		<line number="958" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="959">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="960">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Just in case I want to - there be no misunderstanding, when you say that these statements are not correct, are you trying to convey that they were the words of somebody else?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="961">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="962">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>These are the words of de Waal?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="963">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="964">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="965">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>If I may explain, while I was writing the five statements - the first statement started on the 27th, I handed to Mr de Waal because he said</text>
		</line>
		<line number="966" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Well, you will just be released, you will be a witness&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="967">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>And when he came - he came back and he said:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="968" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Colonel van Niekerk is not happy with this, it is not satisfactory, you must change this and this and this&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="969">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="970">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	So what has been broadcast throughout South Africa as being my words are in fact not correct and Mr de Waal actually states that clearly in his statement, that he actually asked me to change it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="971">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="972">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="973">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But van Niekerk did not instruct you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="974">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="975">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, de Waal is the guy ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="976">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>But Mr de Waal came back and said</text>
		</line>
		<line number="977" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Colonel van Niekerk said: &quot;This is not satisfactory&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="978">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>and so forth.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="979">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, so anyway, the way in which you ought to write it is what de Waal said you should write?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="980">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Correct.  I may add that I kept notes of that as well, of what he told me to change but they got lost in the papers and so forth because I was under Section 29 then.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="981">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Do carry on.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="982">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mrs Derby-Lewis, I refer you to page 272 of Exhibit R4 ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="983">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>272?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="984">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>272 Mr Chairman, paragraph 65.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="985">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Just hold it.  Paragraph what?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="986">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>I beg your pardon Mr Chairman?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="987">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Paragraph?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="988">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Paragraph 65, page 272.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="989">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="990">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="991">
			<speaker>JUDGE WILSON</speaker>
			<text>Same day?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="992">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="993">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Have you got it Mrs Derby-Lewis?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="994">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="995">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR PRINSLOO</text>
		</line>
		<line number="996" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;And when I say Kuba, Clive and I discussed that something should be done&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="997">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>et., does this not refer to a specific time and it continues statement?  This particular paragraph 65, does it refer to paragraph 65 of your previous statements?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="998">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he came in and he mentioned certain paragraphs and I had to elucidate on the those paragraphs and the statement 269, Exhibit A114 is the elucidation or the clearing up of certain queries and directions that he gave me in terms of writing the statement and 272 refers to the previous paragraph 65.  And I say here - when I say</text>
		</line>
		<line number="999" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Kuba and Clive and I discussed that something should be done&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1000">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>etc., this does not refer to a specific time.  We, the three of us and others talked of what could happen if nothing was done to stop an ANC/SACP take-over.  Many people talked about it, I do not refer to a specific time here - only as a background to our association.  I should have perhaps said quote:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1001" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Kuba and Clive and others sometimes discussed that something should be done&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1002">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Now, if I may add in that ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1003">
			<speaker>JUDGE WILSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1004" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Rid the country of the communists&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1005">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1006">
			<speaker>JUDGE WILSON</speaker>
			<text>That was taken out?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1007">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  Well, he asked me to elaborate on it but by that time of course I must add that I was very tired and disorientated.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1008">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, do carry on.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1009">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now paragraph 66, this paragraph refers to 1993 while the previous paragraph refers to</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1010" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;The growth of our association with Kuba.  Clive informed me in March 1993, that he and Kuba were planning something concerning someone on the list but I was not party to those discussions.  I was however aware that discussions were taking place&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1011">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1012">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Was anything like this said by you on the video tapes during your interrogation by Mr Deetleffs?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1013">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1014">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Paragraph 72 which appears at page 273 ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1015">
			<speaker>JUDGE WILSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1016">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1017">
			<speaker>JUDGE WILSON</speaker>
			<text>This is the new version?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1018">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1019">
			<speaker>JUDGE WILSON</speaker>
			<text>So, what has happened is, you have changed</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1020" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Clive said he and Kuba had discussed eliminating somebody&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1021">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>And it now reads:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1022" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Clive informed me that he and Kuba were planning something concerning someone&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1023">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1024">
			<speaker>JUDGE WILSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1025">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No, that is also not correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1026">
			<speaker>JUDGE WILSON</speaker>
			<text>No, but it has removed the words: &quot;eliminating&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1027">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1028">
			<speaker>JUDGE WILSON</speaker>
			<text>...[indistinct] your original version.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1029">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, but he still wanted me to admit that I knew that they were planning to do something, which is not correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1030">
			<speaker>JUDGE WILSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1031">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1032">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, page 273, paragraph 72, that particular paragraph Mrs Derby-Lewis, what do you say to that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1033">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1034" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I was not aware of his exact plans&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1035">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1036">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	And during the taped - the video tapes which I viewed at the week-end recently, Mr Deetleffs continued to ask me about a gun and in the end I said to him quite vehemently:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1037" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I know nothing about guns, why do you keep asking me about guns&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1038">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>I never saw a gun.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1039">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>So Mrs Derby-Lewis, why did you then write in paragraph 72 about the gun?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1040">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Because Mr Deetleffs ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1041">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1042">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1043">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1044">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mrs Derby-Lewis, you say you knew nothing about guns ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1045">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1046">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1047">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>You mean this paragraph?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1048">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, paragraph 72, why did you write that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1049">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Because they were obsessed with my knowing about a gun, that was part of the plan to implicate me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1050">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And you did mention - during your interrogation of Deetleffs, that there was continuously reference made to a gun.  Did you ever admit to Deetleffs - during interrogation, that a gun was used?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1051">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>On the contrary, I became quite aggressive with him at one stage and I said</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1052" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Why are you always talking about a gun?  I know nothing about guns, at my age why would I sit here an lie to you&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1053">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1054">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, paragraph 73 - yes, yes, now if you read the first introductory part</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1055" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Why did we get names on the list&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1056">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1057">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1058">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, who introduced this word</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1059" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Why did we get names on the list&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1060">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Well, I presume Mr de Waal because it was only me who requested those names, it was only me who received the names back.  There was no ...[indistinct] on those names.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1061">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>In addition, the rest of the paragraph</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1062" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1063">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1064">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And then it continues - the last paragraph of paragraph 73</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1065" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Clive and/or Kuba&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1066">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Clive and/or Kuba?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1067">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1068">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR PRINSLOO</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1069" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Wanted a description of the residences and I can only assume that this was to determine what sort of security surrounded the houses&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1070">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No, that is totally incorrect.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1071">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, is that your style of writing</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1072" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;And/or&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1073">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1074">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR PRINSLOO</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1075" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1076">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>That first sentence is incorrect but the last sentence is interesting because during my interrogation with Deetleffs, he said to me</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1077" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Are you copying out&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1078">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>and I said:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1079" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1080">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>And that was purely on a spiritual, emotional level, it had nothing to do with copying out from plans or anything and that was on the tape.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1081">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, if you turn over the page to page 274, paragraph 74</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1082" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Clive told me sometime in March that he and Kuba had decided on Chris Hani to be eliminated&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1083">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1084">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And why did you write it in your own writing Mrs Derby-Lewis?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1085">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1086" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Hurry up, we must go to the Attorney General&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1087">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>then he said I would be released on the 30th when my 10 days was up.  And I said:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1088" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;And what is going to happen to me after that&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1089">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>He said:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1090" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;You will be a witness&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1091">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>They were his words:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1092" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;You will be a witness&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1093">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>That appears on the tapes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1094">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1095">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Right.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1096">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, Mrs Derby-Lewis, paragraph 74 as I read it ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1097">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Paragraph what?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1098">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>74.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1099">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>74.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1100">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1101">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>Pertinently incriminates your husband.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1102">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1103">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1104">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Because Mr - may say something to the Committee, my feeling is that the police wanted to implicate me when I was first taken in and you will see it in that statement that I wrote in prison on the 2nd of May, down at the bottom of the first page.  One of the journalists phoned me two days after my husband was taken and said</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1105" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;The police told them that I was in it up to my neck&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1106">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1107">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, if I may ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1108">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, Mr de Waal ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1109">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>You may have to realise that I was trying to get some information from you on something which is important.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1110">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1111">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>I wanted to know, why did you falsely implicate your husband?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1112">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Well, they told me to write it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1113">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>And you agreed to write it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1114">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1115">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>What did you think they wanted it for - the police - Mr de Waal?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1116">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Pardon?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1117">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>What did you think Mr de Waal wanted this information for?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1118">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Mr de Waal - there were phases in the interrogation, the first was</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1119" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Hurry up and sign this&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1120">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>This was within the first three hours of being taken, I refused to that.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="1121">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1122" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;You do this and you do that&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1123">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>And of course they wanted to implicate me because then I was charged with murder on the 30th of April.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="1124">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	So I could see - I see now in retrospect - now that this documentation is before me because I never saw it before, I see now what I believe to be their plan to implicate me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1125">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>When you implicated your husband, what did you think the police would want that information for?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1126">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1127">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>Did you think he was already in it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1128">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1129" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Neither of you will get bail, your husband will get 15 years&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1130">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1131">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1132">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1133">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1134">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1135">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>ON RESUMPTION</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1136">
			<speaker>GAY DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>(s.u.o.)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1137">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR PRINSLOO:   ...[inaudible]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1138">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1139">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>But in as far as you were concerned?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1140">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No, no.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1141">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And why did you say that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1142">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1143">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>However, when ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1144">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1145" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Because he clearly saw the implications of the list&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1146">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Now, you are saying ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1147">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1148">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, you wrote the words.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1149">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1150">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>And you say that you wrote that because you were advised to say so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1151">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1152">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And who advised you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1153">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Mr de Waal.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1154">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR PRINSLOO</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1155" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1156">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1157">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>But this of putting two and two together ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1158">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1159">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Further down the page, the third paragraph, second line from the top</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1160" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;In Cape Town I put the envelope with my files in the office.  I did not show the list to Clive in Cape Town&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1161">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1162">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And then further down</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1163" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;There was no urgency to discuss the list nor any opportunity&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1164">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Was that correct or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1165">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1166">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Then we turn to page 276, that would be paragraph 81, the second line</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1167" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1168">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No, that is not true.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1169">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The whole of that paragraph or just the last sentence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1170">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>The whole paragraph.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1171">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>When you say the whole paragraph, is that from ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1172">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>I am not trying to take the blame away from Clive - I mean, I never discussed blame with anyone.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1173">
			<speaker>JUDGE WILSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1174">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1175">
			<speaker>JUDGE WILSON</speaker>
			<text>And they - I gather from the heading of this statement that these are all replies to queries from Colonel van Niekerk, now the queries themselves do not appear ...[inaudible]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1176">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>van der Walt.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1177">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1178">
			<speaker>JUDGE WILSON</speaker>
			<text>Colonel van Niekerk.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1179">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Is it van Niekerk?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1180">
			<speaker>JUDGE WILSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1181">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>So, these are in reply to questions by Colonel van Niekerk but put to you by de Waal?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1182">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1183">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Just a moment please Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1184">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1185">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Page 240, paragraph what?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1186">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>It starts at page 248, paragraph 36 at the bottom and it goes over the page to page 249.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1187">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Now, at page 249 Mrs Derby-Lewis, it reads:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1188" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1189">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Leanings, I think.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1190">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1191">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1192">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Page 250 ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1193">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Hold it, just that sentence on page 249, is it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1194">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1195">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1196">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Two sentences rather, you say they were not correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1197">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1198">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Page 250, paragraph 42, towards the first section of paragraph 42, the last three lines</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1199" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1200">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1201">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1202">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And with reference to the exact plans?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1203">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1204">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1205">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1206">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Paragraph 42 yes, Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1207">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	The last two lines on that same page:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1208" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;That night on TV we heard that a gun had been used which had been stolen from the airforce armoury and this is how Clive and I confirmed that it must have been the same gun which Clive had given him and the gun which Clive had showed me one day in the house (with a silencer)&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1209">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No, that is not correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1210">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1211">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1212">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And why did you write that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1213">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Because Mr de Waal - as I mentioned before, was trying to implicate me as far as the gun is concerned and here he does.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1214">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1215" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Clive said he could not believe Kuba had been so amateurish driving around in a red car and not changing his number plates etc.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1216">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>What do you say to that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1217">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No, no, I never discussed number plates with anybody.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1218">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Was there any subsequent discussion, subsequent to the assassination of Mr Hani between you and your husband with regard to that particular aspect?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1219">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Which particular aspect?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1220">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR PRINSLOO</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1221" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Clive said he could not believe that Kuba had been so amateurish driving around in a red car and not changing his number plates etc.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1222">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No, Clive said that he got a shock when he heard about Kuba, he never talked about being amateurish or driving around in a red car or changing any number plates.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1223">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>The next paragraph, paragraph 43, the third line</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1224" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;This was done after much serious thought and because Clive and I felt that unless something dramatic was done, the country would be controlled by communists.  Clive and I therefore highlighted the names of people whom we believed to be the enemies of South Africa&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1225">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>What do you say to that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1226">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1227">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>So you say that was not the discussion between yourself and your husband?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1228">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No, no.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1229">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, the last two lines of that same paragraph</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1230" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1231">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1232">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Why did you write that Mrs Derby-Lewis?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1233">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Well, again I was asked to write that, I was told to put it in.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1234">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Then ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1235">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1236">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Bottom of the page, fourth line from the bottom</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1237" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1238">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1239">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And was there any reason for secrecy?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1240">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1241">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Over the page 252, paragraph 44</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1242" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Certain of the names on the list we believed to be the enemies of South Africa.  Clive and I had made plans at the beginning that some sort of arrangements should be made to liquidate one or perhaps more leaders of the ANC and the South African Communist Party&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1243">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No, I never had any - not true, I never had any plans ever  involving myself to liquidate anybody.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1244">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, why did you say that Mrs Derby-Lewis?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1245">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Because I was told to say it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1246">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, the same paragraph 44 but the second paragraph of that paragraph, third line from the bottom</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1247" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Clive and Kuba decided on Chris Hani to be eliminated because of his particularly brutal record and his position as Chairman of the South African Communist Party, which they believed never should have been unbanned&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1248">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No, I had no knowledge of Clive and Kuba deciding on anything.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1249">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And why did you write that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1250">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>For the same reason as I have described, I was asked to write this by Mr de Waal.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1251">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>The paragraph following on that</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1252" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1253">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No, Clive and Kuba never asked me to send a list Arthur Kemp, I did that on my own and I did not ask the security - anything about security with the houses, I just asked for the addresses and the photographs if possible.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1254">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1255">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1256">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>The next paragraph</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1257" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1258">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1259">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Then the last paragraph of paragraph 44</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1260" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Clive told me some time in March that he and Kuba had decided on Chris Hani as the person to be eliminated&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1261">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No, that is not true.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1262">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Paragraph 45</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1263" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1264">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1265">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR PRINSLOO</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1266" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;The other enemies&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1267">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No, that is not true, I never talked about enemies.  Mr Deetleffs introduced the word enemies during the cross-examination - during the interrogation at the beginning as I mentioned before.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1268">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>With reference to Mr de Waal, has this statement ...[inaudible] to him, what do say about the words used here</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1269" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Other enemies&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1270">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Well, clearly Mr de Waal got the word: &quot;enemies&quot; from Mr Deetleffs.  Maybe they ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1271">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Why do you say that he got them from Deetleffs?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1272">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Well, because they must have colluded.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1273">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>They must have?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1274">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Because that was the whole point of the interrogation, was to come up with some kind of a story which could be presented to the Attorney General in order to justify charging me - this is how I see it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1275">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Was there at any stage reference made by Captain de Waal who interrogated you, that your statement or version was in conflict of the version which was given by your husband?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1276">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, on many occasions he came to me and he said</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1277" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1278">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Still at page 253, starting at the bottom of page 252, paragraph 46</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1279" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1280">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1281" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Fax what you have&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1282">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>and then he said:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1283" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1284">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1285">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1286">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No, it was the 29th of January 1993.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1287">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Paragraph 47, the second paragraph</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1288" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I presume Arthur wanted to see me rather than just faxing me the list because he saw the implications of the list and felt he should not fax it to me&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1289">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1290" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;No, I would rather give it to you because I want to see you&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1291">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>That was the reason why we met.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1292">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And when you actually met Arthur Kemp, did he say anything to you with regard to implications on that list?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1293">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Absolutely nothing, we never discussed it.  He gave it to me in an envelope and I put it in my handbag and we had tea and discussed his life and what he was going to do.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1294">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Page 254, second paragraph of paragraph 48, fourth line from the top - I beg your pardon, from the bottom</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1295" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1296">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1297" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Clive must have given the list to Kuba after that&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1298">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>I have no idea when Clive gave Kuba the list.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1299">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, paragraph 50 at the bottom of the page</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1300" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;The next day it was confirmed in the press that Kuba had been arrested.  Clive then said to me it looked as if Kuba had been set up because it was a rather amateurish job, Kuba had not for example changed the number plates and so forth&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1301">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1302">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did you ever have any opportunity to speak to Walus after he was arrested, before you made this statement?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1303">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1304">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Was there information in the press or anywhere where this information could have been conveyed that for instance, Kuba had not for example, changed the number plates and so forth?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1305">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1306">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, paragraph 51, page 255</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1307" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1308">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1309">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And did you ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1310">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1311">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Paragraph 51, the fourth line from the bottom of the last paragraph of 51</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1312" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1313">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1314" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Clive told me he had not expected Kuba to do the job&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1315">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>is also not true.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1316">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And if you look at page 256, paragraph 56, middle of the page</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1317" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1318">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1319">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1320">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1321" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1322">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1323" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Kuba would not talk&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1324">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1325" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;When I gave the list to my husband there was no writing on it, now there is numbers next to the names and addresses and the registration number BMW525i, PWY525T written on page 13.  The typed part of the pages is the same as I gave it to my husband.  There is number 3 written next to the name of Chris Hani on page - it looks like, B now&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1326">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Well, I never gave the list to my husband and as I have already testified, there was nothing on the list when I brought it home.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1327">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>The next paragraph four</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1328" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1329">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1330">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did you say that to Deetleffs - as was stated here or at least, did Deetleffs show you the list?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1331">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1332">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1333">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1334">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mrs Derby-Lewis, is it also correct that a detention file - referred to as a detention file on yourself, was kept by the police in terms of Section 29 of the Internal Security Act?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1335">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1336">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1337">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1338">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And it contains information pertaining to your detention, treatment and complaints that you had or their observations?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1339">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1340">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>I ask leave to hand this in as Exhibit Z Mr Chairman, I will refer to it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1341">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1342">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>That would be a detention file Mr Chairman, of Gabriella, Maverna Derby-Lewis.  I will now lead certain evidence with regard to certain information in that file on the witness.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1343">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1344">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1345">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And the paragraph following that also refers to reading material and ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1346">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1347">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1348" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Visited Mrs Derby-Lewis, gave her supper, she only ate the fruit, she had no complaints&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1349">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Is that correct Mrs Derby-Lewis?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1350">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1351">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1352">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1353">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1354">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1355" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1356">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1357">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1358">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>I beg your pardon Mr Chairman?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1359">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>Page 6, you said?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1360">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1361">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>The date?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1362">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And the date is the 25th of April and right at the top of the page</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1363" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1364">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1365" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1366">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>And the rest of that page then deals with her doctor - private doctor, is that correct Mrs Derby-Lewis?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1367">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1368">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1369">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Can you read that Mrs Derby-Lewis?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1370" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1371">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>there is something that is not clear.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1372" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;complained that she had a headache and that she had stomach ache and she wished to see Doctor Latsky&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1373">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Is that any mention made - as far as you know, by de Waal?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1374">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1375" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;She has no complaints&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1376">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And the same page, the entry the 25th of April, 11H40</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1377" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1378">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Is that correct, did you say that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1379">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1380">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And this goes from page 7 to page 8 Mr Chairman.  Page 10 Mr Chairman, the date 25th of April at 6p.m., the third line</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1381" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1382">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mrs Derby-Lewis, during your detention - in terms of Section 29, is it correct that Captain de Waal requested you to point out a particular place where you allegedly received the list from Arthur Kemp?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1383">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1384">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1385" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;During an interview with Mrs Derby-Lewis, she ...[indistinct] herself no longer prepared to point out the place - interview conducted by Captain Louw in his office&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1386">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Is it correct that Captain Louw was not attached to the security branch?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1387">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1388">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And when you saw Captain Louw, what did he say to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1389">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>I was told by Mr de Waal to go and point out something and that Captain Louw would go with me or send somebody from the Edenvale Police Station to accompany me.  When I got to Captain Louw, he said to me</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1390" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;You have a choice, you need not go&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1391">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>and I said:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1392" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Well, do I now have a choice&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1393">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>and he said:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1394" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Yes&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1395">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>so I refused to go.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1396">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>In each of your statements which were placed before the Commission, in none of the statements does it appear - from the statement itself, that you were ever warned in terms of the Judges Rules by Captain de Waal, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1397">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1398">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>But from the writing on your statement.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1399">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1400">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>It does not appear from in writing from your statements, that you were warned in terms of Judges Rules.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1401">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No, it was never given any options, only the option of</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1402" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1403">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And if de Waal had given you that warning to say that you were not obliged to say anything but should you say anything, it would be taken down in writing and may be used as evidence, would you have exercised that option or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1404">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No, I would not have exercised that option.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1405">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Why not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1406">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1407">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Did de Waal give you an option to remain silent?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1408">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1409">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>What did he require?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1410">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1411">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mrs Derby-Lewis, on the 30th of April when - I beg your pardon, before I proceed, the document Exhibit Y1 which you compiled with regard to the treatment meted out to you by the police whilst detained in terms of Section 29, you also made a note with reference to what transpired between you and Captain Louw - just a moment Mr Chairman, at page 8 of Exhibit Y1 Mr Chairman</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1412" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1413">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1414">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mrs Derby-Lewis, on the 30th of April 1993 you were exempted from the provisions of Section 29 and you were then interviewed by Detective Warrant Officer Holmes who was the investigating officer in this case.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1415">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	I now show you a document which will be referred to as Exhibit AA Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1416">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	Mrs Derby-Lewis, in this statement Exhibit AA the Detective Warrant Officer - according to the document, informed you of your rights and asked you whether you understood it and at page three you said: &quot;Yes&quot; and then after your signature on page two  the question is:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1417" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;What do you wish to do, make a statement, only answer questions or remain silent&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1418">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>and your reply was:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1419" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Remain silent&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1420">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1421">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1422">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And why did you exercise that right at that stage whereas previously you made statements to the police?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1423">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>I exercised the right because he gave me a choice and previously I had no choice.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1424">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And after you were exempted from the provisions of Section 29, you were then taken to court and you appeared in court, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1425">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1426">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>That is the Magistrates Court?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1427">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1428">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>You were then charged with the murder of Mr Chris Hani?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1429">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1430">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, subsequent to your appearance in court, is it correct that the Attorney General - Mr van Leerus at the time, issued a certificate in which you were refused the right to make an application for bail, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1431">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1432">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>In terms of the ...[indistinct] Act?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1433">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1434">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Now, during your detention in the prison, you wrote the document Y1 which you already testified to before the Commission and subsequent to the trial you wrote a document which is referred to as: &quot;Ons Eie&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1435">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1436">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1437">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>At the end of December 1993, an Afrikaans magazine called: &quot;One Eie&quot; asked me to write an article about my detention, which I wrote and then they translated into Afrikaans.  This is another record of what happened to me in detention and it was done at a time when there was no thought of a Truth Commission or anything like that, it was even done before the ANC took over in April 1994.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1438">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>I ask leave to hand this document in Mr Chairman, as Exhibit AB - the original is available.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1439">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What is the date of that document?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1440">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>I beg your pardon Mr Chairman?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1441">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What is the date?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1442">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>The date of this document is February 1994.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1443">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>It was published in February 1994 but the article was written in December 1993.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1444">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mrs Derby-Lewis, at your trial which followed, no statements made in terms of Section 29 were used by the State.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1445">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1446">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Is it also correct that at your trial the police docket at that stage, was not made available to defence at all?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1447">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1448">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>And the information which you compiled and put into Exhibits Y1 and 2 were done in custody without the statements which are now before the Commission?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1449">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1450">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mrs Derby-Lewis, in as far as the articles are concerned which you intended writing pertaining to the list which was presented to Mr Kemp and the one you received thereupon, you said you wanted to write as to how people lived.  Apart from those people on the list, did you have any other persons in mind whom you wanted to write about?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1451">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1452">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>The public meetings which you attended of the Conservative Party subsequent to your release and after your acquittal till to date, was there ever any repudiation of the conduct of yourself, your husband or Walus, by the CP?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1453">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No, on the contrary we were always well received by the Conservative Party.  I still remained an active member of the Party, I rejoined the system as it was.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1454">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Just a moment please Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1455">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1456">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1457">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1458">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1459">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	He replaced Mr Tom Langley and Mr Schalk Pienaar replaced Mr Kas Uys, both of whom were senior members of the Party, so my husband was - then at that stage, at a very high level in the Party.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1460">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>So, did he continue to hold an executive position in the CP?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1461">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, he was part of a - there were seven committees set up to make a policy of the Party and he was made Chairman of one of those committee together Mr ...[indistinct] van der Merwe.   May I read a small paragraph on this issue?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1462">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1463">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>From The Beeld.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1464">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Yes, you may do so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1465">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1466" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;In November last year together with Mr Schalk Pienaar, CPL MP for Potgietersrust was elected to the CP Executive in the place of Mr Thomas Langley and Mr Kas Uys, two founder members of the CP.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1467">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1468">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1469">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, I undertake to make copies of this document, I only have one but I believe the actual report of The Beeld was handed in by Mr Bizos at some stage.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1470">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1471">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1472">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1473">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1474">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Well, I was a journalist and I wrote articles in the newspaper, so I was very attuned to the way the Party felt and since the unbanning of the SACP and the ANC in 1990, the Party stepped up a campaign of alerting people as to what dangers lay ahead and that was handed in our bundle - I think it was Addendum C, whereby there were extracts from The Patriot.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1475">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1476">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>In as far as the Conservative Party is concerned Mrs Derby-Lewis, was there at any stage - prior to the assassination of Mr Hani, the belief that the ANC and the Communist Party will take power in this country?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1477">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, very much so.  The Editorials of The Patriot and the discussions amongst the people were - people were very afraid because - as I mentioned before, Mr de Klerk had gone ahead without a mandate, so the Party itself was militant and the people - the members, were also militant.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1478">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1479">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	In terms of what Mr Bizos refers to as the: &quot;brandy and coke brigade&quot; who sit in the bars and talk about all the things that they were going to do, there were more serious discussions than that but it was generally agreed within the right that anything that would be discussed or planned would be kept to an absolute minimum need to know basis.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="1480">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	But there were definitely discussions, people were planning resistance, the climate was extremely tense and people were really afraid of what was coming - of what they knew was coming, it was a genuine fear.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1481">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>The Conservative Party, did they spell out that they would oppose the ANC/SACP coming into power or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1482">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, on many occasions they said: &quot;They must be stopped, we will stop them&quot;.  It was discussed - not only in The Patriot, it was discussed at the various meetings and councils and congresses of the Party and in September 1992, it was decided that - a motion was passed that a freedom could not be attained through passive means, it would attained through active resistance.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1483">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>What was the perception in the minds of the White electorate - particularly the right, with regard to the fact that the SACP/ANC would take power?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1484">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1485">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1486">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1487">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mrs Derby-Lewis, in as far as Mr Arthur Kemp is concerned, did you at any stage learn from him why you were charged or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1488">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1489">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Why what?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1490">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Why the witness Mr Chairman, was charged in this particular case.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1491">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, just after I was given bail I met Mr Kemp and he told me that he had discussed with Mr Holmes - Warrant Officer Holmes, he said: &quot;Why did you arrest Gay&quot;? and Warrant Officer Holmes said that the only reason he was charging me was that, quote: &quot;So we can use her test ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1492">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Is Mr Kemp going to be called to corroborate this statement? - a serious allegation is being made against an officer, are we going to hear Mr Kemp or are we only going to have the hearsay evidence of the witness?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1493">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1494">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>We have been patient for a long time in the production of hearsay ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1495">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1496">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>But I think that the time has come that we should ask you to intervene and not allow the witness to make out a case for herself without primary evidence being led.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1497">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1498">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1499">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>I will retract that Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1500">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1501">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Just a second please Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1502">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1503">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>As you please Mr Chairman.  Just a moment please.  Thank you Mr Chairman, that concludes the evidence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1504">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR PRINSLOO</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1505">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Are there any questions you wish to put to the witness?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1506">
			<speaker>MS VAN DER WALT</speaker>
			<text>I have no questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1507">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Bizos?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1508">
			<speaker>CROSS EXAMINATION BY MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Mrs Derby-Lewis, you said to your counsel that when giving evidence before the Judge President of the Transvaal - as it then was Justice Eloff, you prevaricated.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1509">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1510">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>The Chairman asked you whether that meant that you lied.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1511">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1512">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Will you please enumerate the lies that you told the Judge President of the Transvaal?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1513">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1514">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>The first one?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1515">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1516">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, what was the lie there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1517">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, page 515 of the court record.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1518">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>What is the point?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1519">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Pardon?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1520">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>On what point did you lie?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1521">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Well, I have made a note here ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1522">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1523">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Can I just read that without you going through the record?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1524">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1525">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	 I think that you want to know just precisely what points on which she ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1526">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, on what points did you lie?  Please tell us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1527">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>The lie that I told on two or three occasions during the testimony was</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1528" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Did you give the list&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1529">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1530">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>There were - these, yes sorry, it concerned the fact as to whether Clive had given Kuba the list.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1531">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And you lied about that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1532">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>I did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1533">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Did you lie in order to protect your husband?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1534">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>I did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1535">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Are you not lying now - through your teeth, in order to get amnesty for your husband?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1536">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Definitely not Mr Bizos, definitely not.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1537">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1538">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1539">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Did you lie about the gun?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1540">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1541">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Did you tell Judge President Eloff the whole truth about your discussions with your husband and Mr Walus about the gun?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1542">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>I never discussed a gun with Mr Walus or my husband.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1543">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Was that the truth?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1544">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>That was the truth.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1545">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Did you lie to Judge President Eloff about the policy of the Conservative Party in relation to violence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1546">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1547">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1548">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>In 1992, that was an option, it was decided upon at the Kimberly Congress.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1549">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Please answer the question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1550">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>I have answered the question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1551">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1552">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>It was never the policy of the Conservative Party - it was never part of the policy, to use murder as a political objective.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1553">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Or violence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1554">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Or violence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1555">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1556">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1557">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1558">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1559">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1560">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1561">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>What was the policy of the Conservative Party, one of violence or non- violence in April 1993?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1562">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>The policy of the Conservative Party in April 1993 was set by the Congress in September 1992, where active resistance was declared an option.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1563">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Who was to decide whether that option should come into force or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1564">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>The Party.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1565">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Did the Party - before April 1993, decide that violence was now an option?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1566">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Not that I know of.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1567">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Not that you know of.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1568">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Not officially.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1569">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Well, knowledge is knowledge, what unofficial special knowledge did you have about the Conservative Party having a policy of violence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1570">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1571">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Did you understand that - that the Conservative Party was speaking with two tongues?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1572">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1573">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1574">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1575">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>did you consider that statement as a statement that the option that was mentioned in Kimberly in 1992 was to be exercised in April 1993?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1576">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1577">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>No, you were the information - well informed person of the Conservative Party, please give us a straight answer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1578">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>That is a straight answer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1579">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Was the police - let me finish please, was the policy of the Conservative Party by April 1993, one of violence or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1580">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>I answered that question a minute ago, I said no unequivocally.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1581">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>No, absolutely not, but you added that you had the ear of the Deputy Leader of the Party.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1582">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1583">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Well, I thought that you said that he said at a meeting that: &quot;We do not put all our cards on the table&quot;, what did you understand by that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1584">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1585">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>I beg your pardon?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1586">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1587">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1588">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1589">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>He said to 300 people that: &quot;We do not talk openly about or policy, is that what it is?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1590">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No, he did not say that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1591">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>What did he say?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1592">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1593">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>How did you understand that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1594">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1595">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  Now, when you gave evidence before Judge Eloff, did you tell the truth about the policy of the Conservative Party and your personal attitude to it in relation to violence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1596">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1597">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1598">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1599">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Right.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1600">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>And why I did so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1601">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Can we accept that everything else that you told Judge Eloff, you will not accept as being true?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1602">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I would say so, he picked out that particular point and he said I prevaricated, he said I was not truthful: &quot;She was protecting her husband probably&quot; and he was 100% right.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1603">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1604">
			<speaker>JUDGE WILSON</speaker>
			<text>Can you say what Volume it is?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1605">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1606">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, will that be pages 6, 7 and 9 in brackets or the open numbers?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1607">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1608">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1609">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible] the others are found in the record.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1610">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1611">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1612">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Should you not have the record Mr Chairman?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1613">
			<speaker>JUDGE WILSON</speaker>
			<text>In brackets we have page - or I have, page (6), (7), (8) and it then goes to page 681.  The other number given is page 538 and it jumps to 541.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1614">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1615">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>We have a copy Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1616">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Which has those pages?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1617">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1618">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>We have one copy Mr Chairman, which one member of the Committee can follow.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1619">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible] propose reading out that passage to put your question to her?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1620">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible] page (6), (7), (8), line 25 - we will make sure that those pages of photostatted and put in your records Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1621" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;As far as the record is concerned, both Mr Faan Venter and Mr Darrel testified that it was discussed at Conservative Party Meetings where Mr Darrel was present and where your husband addressed the audience, that there is a possibility that licences that are - that had been issued might be recalled and that people will be left unarmed&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1622">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Are you aware of that?  Oh, 1993, sorry, 1993.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="1623">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>I beg your pardon, no, I beg your pardon, sorry - (6), (7), (9), yes:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1624" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;The Conservative Party has even made public statements - our spokesman of Law and Order, Mr Schalk Pienaar expressed the possibility in public statements&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1625">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1626">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, you mean ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1627">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1628">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1629">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1630" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;That was in order to stockpile weapons&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1631">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Was that in accordance with the CP policy or with your personal, political intervenes?  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="1632" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I would not say the CP had not ? view, the CP had not made a ruling on that, we had had a congress in September 1992 in Kimberly - a general congress and three resolutions were passed, the first was that the option of the election be the first sort, then second was negotiations.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1633">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1634">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Is that your answer and is it true?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1635">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1636">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR BIZOS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1637" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;So there was nothing sinister in the fact that people were stockpiling weapons&quot;? - &quot;No, not at all&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1638">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;It was not intended to go and - say for example, to murder Mr Hani&quot;? - &quot;No, everybody was talking about it -  Mr de Vos, could you reach&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1639">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1640" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;The last ...[indistinct] aspect we dealt Mrs Derby-Lewis, is the question of stockpiling and you explained to the court what the decisions were at the CP Congress in Kimberly.  According to your own knowledge, was there a general attitude amongst your supporters to obtain weapons and to stockpile that for some future event&quot;? - Yes&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1641">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1642">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1643">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR BIZOS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1644" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;But that event was not a certain fact&quot;? - &quot;No, it was - what is the word, I cannot think of the word, it was a plan - contingency plan, in other words it was not a policy, the Party did not say: &quot;Go out and stockpile weapons but the point was that they did not trust the Government.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1645" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>There had been a record of lies over the last five years and they would say one thing and do another, so one felt that any guarantees that were given were not worth the paper they were written on.  So, the general feeling amongst Conservatives was that we had to look after ourselves in the event of something happening&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1646">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Are you happy with that answer and is it true?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1647">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1648">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Good.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1649" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;But what course should be taken in future was still to be decided&quot;? - &quot;Yes, we are all members of a Party and we take instructions from the Party&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1650">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Are you happy with that answer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1651">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that is the way I feel.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1652">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1653" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Now at that stage, during the or before the 10th of April, was the Conservative Party still involved in negotiations at the World Trade Centre&quot;? - &quot;Yes, that is true&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1654">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Are you happy with that answer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1655">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1656">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR BIZOS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1657" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;And do you have any knowledge when did the Conservative Party withdraw from the negotiations&quot; - &quot;If I remember correctly it was last month or a month or two ago, I am not sure&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1658">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Was that your answer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1659">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1660">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR BIZOS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1661" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;So it was - intervenes - it was some months after April&quot; - &quot;Yes, yes&quot; &quot;1992&quot;? - &quot;Yes&quot; - court - &quot;993, Mr de Vos - Oh 1993, sorry, sorry, 1993&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1662">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>You were giving evidence during October 1993, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1663">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1664">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And when you said that the Conservative Party was still negotiating until a month or a month or two ago, that would not take us further back than August 1993, would that be correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1665">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>I think it finished in July 1993.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1666">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Well after April anyway?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1667">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1668">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1669">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1670">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1671" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Now you have read in the newspapers I suppose, what was said about murder, so-called conspiracy etc.&quot;? - &quot;Yes&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1672">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Did you&quot; - &quot;Yes, I read lots of things in lots of newspapers&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1673">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;And have you read more in the newspapers than what you have heard in court&quot;? - &quot;Yes, I have been convicted and tried by the newspapers&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1674">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;And does that also apply to accused number one and two&quot;? - &quot;Well, the three of us have&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1675">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Now, if you were in fact involved in a conspiracy, would you have organised the murder of Mr Hani in the way it was described in court&quot;? - &quot;Well, I would not have organised any murder&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1676">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;But it seems to be to be as if the man who murdered Mr Hani virtually acted on his own on that day - there was no getaway car or anything to that effect, would you agree with that&quot; - &quot;Well on the face of it, yes&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1677">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Now can we please go on to page (682).</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1678" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Are you aware of any common purpose that was formed between accused number one to murder Mr Hani?&quot; - &quot;No&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1679">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Are you aware of any conspiracy between accused number one and two and yourself, to murder Mr Hani or the people mentioned in Exhibit J? - &quot;No&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1680">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Now, on the 12th when the list was discussed, when Mr Kemp was at your premises, did you get the impression that accused number two was quite surprised when the question about the list came up and it was alleged that that was the same that was in Mr&quot; - &quot;Ja, actually we had - oh, sorry, we had discussed earlier.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="1681" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>When I went to buy the newspaper and I came back with The Beeld and I saw that they had specified in The Beeld that there were some journalists names and there were nine names and so forth and I discussed it and then my husband and I&quot; - intervenes</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1682" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;And was he surprised to hear about this&quot;? - &quot;Yes, we were shocked and -well, we were shocked&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1683">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1684">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1685">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And was it part of your case that you never asked your husband - either after the murder before your arrest or after your release from arrest or whilst preparing for trial, or whilst you were speaking to him during the court adjournments, that you never asked him anything about the list, anything about the gun and anything about the manner in which he was or may have been involved in this murder?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1686">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1687">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>That was your case?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1688">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>May I elaborate on that answer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1689">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, if you must.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1690">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>We were told by our attorneys that we were never to discuss the case at all with anyone.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1691">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, and you observed that instruction?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1692">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Well, I was in jail for three and a half months, so I never discussed it then and then when I came out on bail I used to visit my husband and he was always in the company of somebody at the prison and we subsequently found out that our visits were taped in any event.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1693">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	And then when we were in court they were brought in and they were taken downstairs, there was very little time to discuss the case and in any event the attorney told us not to discuss the case.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1694">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1695">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>But, after the murder, no attorney told you not to discuss with your husband whether or not he had any involvement in this murder.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1696">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No, the attorneys told us not to discuss the case with anybody and I was never in a position to discuss anything with my husband without anybody present.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1697">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Is this before your arrest?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1698">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1699">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1700">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR BIZOS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1701" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;...[inaudible] so that is the first time you heard about the pistol and did you discuss this pistol with your husband - this issue of the firearm&quot;? - &quot;No&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1702">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Are you with me at 686?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1703">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  Sorry, 686?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1704">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1705">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Oh, yes, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1706">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR BIZOS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1707" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I discussed it with him later on when we were travelling in the police car going to the courts&quot; - &quot;Yes&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1708">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;When was this, before or after the charge sheet had been served on you&quot;? - &quot;No, we were already in jail - when you were - in jail and we just discussed the case&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1709">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1710">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;And what did your husband say about the pistol&quot;? - &quot;Nothing&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1711">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Nothing&quot;? - &quot;No&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1712">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Is that the truth?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1713">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1714">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1715">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1716">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>No, the question was - whether in view of your answers, did it occur to you that one of the reasons that you must have been disbelieved by the Judge, was because of your answers in relation to the gun?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1717">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No, not at all, it never occurred to me whatsoever.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1718">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR BIZOS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1719" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Not a word&quot;? - &quot;Well, we were in the car with eight policemen&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1720">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;You were having one car, eight policemen, that is quite a package.  What type of car was this&quot;? - &quot;It was an Inyala&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1721">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Oh, in that one of the police&quot;? - &quot;The police van yes&quot;? </text>
		</line>
		<line number="1722">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;The big one&quot;? - &quot;Yes&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1723">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;But you say accused number one found time to say something to you about the pistol but not your husband&quot;? - &quot;Correct&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1724">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;And did your husband ever say anything to you about the pistol&quot;? - &quot;No&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1725">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Then further on:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1726" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Did you ask him about it&quot;? - &quot;No, no never&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1727">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Never&quot;? - &quot;Since he was arrested it was always a piece of plastic between us at the jail - was sitting in the Inyala&quot; </text>
		</line>
		<line number="1728">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Even here during court session, did you ever ask him about these allegations&quot; - &quot;No&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1729">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1730">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>I beg your pardon?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1731">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Were you asking me a question?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1732">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1733" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1734">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1735">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Bizos, whereabouts are you now?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1736">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Last line 687.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1737">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1738">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR BIZOS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1739" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1740">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1741">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;And you also did not tell him anything about the list which had the names on&quot;? - &quot;Yes, I discussed it with him on the 12th&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1742">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;On the 12th, this was after it was published in the newspapers&quot;? - &quot;Correct&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1743">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Yes, you drew your attention to it&quot;? - &quot;Pardon&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1744">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Did you draw his attention to it or what&quot;? - &quot;Yes, I drew his attention&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1745">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1746">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;...[inaudible] Smith testify that he fitted the silencer and gave it to Darrel&quot;? - &quot;No, I do not know Mr Smith at all, I was not in Cape Town, I know nothing about that part&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1747">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;And you heard the ballistics evidence by the ballistics expert that this particular weapon, Exhibit 2 was the one that killed - on his evidence, the deceased and did you ask your husband about the weapon then&quot;? - &quot;We discussed the evidence, yes - that it was highly technical nature, we could not understand it&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1748">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I see, so at no stage did you talk to him about the weapon&quot;? - &quot;No&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1749">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;And he did not volunteer anything to you either&quot;? - &quot;No&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1750">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Well, I have to put it to you that it is improbable that you never discussed this vital piece of information with him and that is what I am going to argue later, that you are not telling the truth, the truth when you say that you never discussed the question of his possession of the weapon that killed Mr Hani, with him&quot;? - &quot;No, I did not&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1751">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Were those your answers?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1752">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>They were correct, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1753">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And you repeat them here?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1754">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I repeat them here.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1755">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And you have nothing further to add in relation to it and you want your credibility - you are happy to have your credibility on this issue, decided by the Committee on the questions and answers that I have read out to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1756">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>May I make a comment?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1757">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1758">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1759">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Finished?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1760">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1761">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>The pressure that you speak of - of Section 29 or the alleged trickery of the police or any other pressure that was put on you during your period of detention, could not persuade you to say anything about the gun?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1762">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1763">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Is the answer that all the pressure did not induce you to make a - to even falsely say that you had some knowledge about this gun?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1764">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>But even if I had falsely said it, they would have immediately known that it was false knowledge because I have no technical knowledge of a gun.  There was simply no evidence at all that I had seen a gun or discussed a gun.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1765">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Now, let us ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1766">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>Sorry Mr Bizos, any questions relating to the gun, do you understand as being technical questions in relation to the operations of the gun or were they simply questions in relation to whether or not a gun was used in this particular case?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1767">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1768">
			<speaker>JUDGE WILSON</speaker>
			<text>But the question I find difficult is not whether you were interested in guns or not but whether you were interested in whether your husband had supplied a gun to murder someone.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1769">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1770">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1771">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No, in fact my husband was taken downstairs and we were not allowed into the cell, we used to stand outside but there were a group of us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1772">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>What group?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1773">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Well, it was Kuba and the attorneys and one or two friends had come down but the police insisted that my husband and Mr Walus be placed in the cell, so we used to stand there with the people and have a sandwich.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1774">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>In the long passages?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1775">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No, there were cells down underneath the Johannesburg Supreme Court and we stood outside the cell, they were locked in the cell.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1776">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>You were on bail and he was in the cell?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1777">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1778">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And were you not concerned whether or not you were married to a murderer as alleged by the State or an innocent man that you believed him to be?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1779">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Well, I left it to the attorneys and the courts to decide what had happened.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1780">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Were you or were you not interested whether or not your husband was a murderer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1781">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Of course I was interested and concerned.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1782">
			<speaker>JUDGE NGOEPE</speaker>
			<text>Why did you not ask him? - such a loving couple that you were.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1783">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1784">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>No, please.  Mr Bizos, please put your questions in a proper way.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1785">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible] absolutely - were you not absolutely burning with a desire to find out whether or not the allegations in the indictment by your husband that - particularly that he supplied the gun, that he supplied a gun with a silencer, were you not interested in finding out?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1786">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Not at all.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1787">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Not at all.  And you are serious in that answer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1788">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1789">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1790">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>I asked him that on the 12th.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1791">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1792">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>This was before the indictment was handed to us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1793">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1794">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Before we were even arrested.  On the 12th when I bought The Beeld in the morning, I saw that they had mentioned the names of journalists in the list and I adduced that it was my list.  And then when I came home I asked my husband: &quot;Is this our list and how did this man get it&quot; and he said: &quot;I gave it to him&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1795">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>I see, is that what your evidence before Judge Eloff was?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1796">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1797">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1798">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Certainly.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1799">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>You were prepared to defeat the ends of justice in relation to the acquittal of - possible acquittal of your husband, by lying - deliberately lying?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1800">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Well, the attorneys told us that the court would find out anyway what happened, that I was trying to protect him and I admitted to that to this Committee.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1801">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1802">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1803">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Well, ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1804">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Sir, may I finish?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1805">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1806">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1807">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Now, you decided to go into the witness box when your husband decided not to go into the ...[inaudible]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1808">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>That was his decision on the advice of his attorneys.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1809">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  And not only did you lie about what your husband had said about the list but you also became very inventive during the course of your evidence, you made up a whole scenario as to how he probably picked it up from your glass table.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1810">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1811">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1812">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1813">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1814">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1815">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Where did you suggest he got the possible theory that Mr Walus picked up the list from the table by accident?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1816">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>I have no idea.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1817">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Did the question come as a complete surprise to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1818">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1819">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Well, did you reflect on it before answering it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1820">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1821">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And when you said that it was possible, you knew that in fact that had not happened?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1822">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1823">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>I want to take you to the bottom of page 693 of your evidence - before I do that, was Mr Kemp assured - in your presence, that he must not worry because Walus would not talk?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1824">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1825">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Who testified to that fact?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1826">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Kemp.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1827">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Did you ask you husband to refresh your memory for the purposes of this hearing?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1828">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1829">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>I beg your pardon?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1830">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1831">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>If you do not recall, did you ask your husband - for the purposes of this hearing ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1832">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1833">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1834">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1835">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1836">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1837">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Why not?  We know that your husband was guilty of murder ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1838">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>On the 12th ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1839">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Let me finish.  We know that you had drawn up the list, we know that Mr Kemp had something to do with the list and it all involved Mr Walus who had been arrested three days before, once three people involved in that way, why would you not have discussed your defence on the morning of the 12th?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1840">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Because there was nothing to defend, neither Arthur nor I had become involved in that list for any sinister purpose - there was nothing to defend.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1841">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>But why would your husband not say to you and/or to Mr Kemp, that the police are going to come - that you agree with, you expected the police to come?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1842">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, because the list was in the newspaper and we were worried.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1843">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1844">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Definitely not.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1845">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Well, we know that two people now admit that they conspired to murder, why should conspirators or at least one of them - when a material witness is present like Mr Kemp, why would they loose the opportunity to try and work out a false defence for themselves?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1846">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Because their attorneys told them not to testify, Mr Kemp - what he said was completely correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1847">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Did you consult attorneys before the 12th of April Madam?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1848">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1849">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1850">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1851">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1852">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1853">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1854">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1855">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Well, you have admitted to telling lies under oath in respect of some matters.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1856">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>I told one lie under oath and I admitted it and I said why I did it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1857">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1858">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Bizos, you make the mistake of imputing to somebody who tells one lie, that they are a perennial liar, that is not the case.  I particularly brought this matter up before the Committee today so that they would see what I had done.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1859">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1860" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Yes, you are an experienced journalist</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1861">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Have the members of the Committee got this portion, 693 Mr Chairman?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1862" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;You are an experienced journalist and you had those insights and you knew that this would very easily lead to civil war or something like that in this country - the potential was there&quot;? - &quot;Correct&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1863">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Yes, and obviously if you love this country so much, one would have expected you - as you profess, one would have expected you to have taken immediate steps to give whatever assistance you can to the police to try and unravel this particular murder&quot;? - &quot;But no, I repeat, we were apprehensive and very afraid&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1864">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Well, I want to suggest to you that your conduct rather indicates the conduct of somebody who has got something to hide&quot; - &quot;Well, you entitled to your suggestions Sir&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1865">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Do you want to add anything in relation to that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1866">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1867">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>No, very well.  Now, can we please go to page 697</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1868" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Are you one of those people who refuse to bow to the yoke of communism and ...[indistinct]&quot;? - &quot;Very definitely&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1869">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, what line is that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1870">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1871">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1872">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR BIZOS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1873" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1874">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Those were negotiations, election, election and passive or active resistance&quot;? - &quot;Correct&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1875">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;And if it had come to active resistance, I take it in your mind said that you were such that you have participated in that&quot;? - &quot;If the Conservative Party had decided upon it, I am a follower and a believer and I would have done so&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1876">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Did you say that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1877">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1878">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Is that a clear statement of fact, that at that time the Conservative Party had not decided to go over to active resistance?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1879">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1880">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I know that this question was asked before the Act providing for amnesty was passed and this is why we will argue to the Committee that your answer there was the truth, can we accept it as a fact that at the time - in April, that the Conservative Party had not decided to go over to active resistance?  Do you agree with that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1881">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Well, the Conservative Party had decided upon a mobilisation plan which was ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1882">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Answer the question please ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1883">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1884">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>With respect Mr Chairman, the witness has not been given the opportunity to answer the question ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1885">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>I will answer the question as I see fit.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1886">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1887">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Sorry.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1888">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1889">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1890">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>&quot;The Party had already embarked on a mobilisation campaign&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1891">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1892">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible] the suggestion of the word mobilisation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1893">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1894">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Is the statement - as it stands question and answer, true or false?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1895">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Absolutely true.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1896">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1897">
			<speaker>JUDGE WILSON</speaker>
			<text>What do you mean by mobilisation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1898">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>After the September congress, the Party decided to mobilise, in other words to begin to prepare for active resistance and a mobilisation strategy was set in place and 17 or 18 categories were defined, some of which were defence and security and there was a policy of a homeland decided upon - where the homeland would be.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1899">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1900">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>That was the objective, the objective was to stop.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1901">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>The objective was to stop, we were mobilising to protect ourselves from a communist take-over.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1902">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1903" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Well, it would have been quite in accordance with their attitude that you are not prepared to suffer the yoke of communism and tyranny&quot; - &quot;Correct&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1904">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Right, so the answer is really: &quot;Yes, I would have participated in active resistance&quot; - &quot;Correct&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1905">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;And these views of your of course, are entirely in conformity with the views of the first accused you have told us about&quot;? - &quot;Yes, these are the views of the Conservative Party&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1906">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Well these views that you would actively participate to unyoke yourself from the yoke of communist tyranny - if called upon those views are also the views of the first accused ...[indistinct]&quot; - &quot;Yes, I presume it for him&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1907">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Yes, you told us he is staunchly anti-Communist and so forth and that is the way you know him&quot;? - &quot;Yes, so if I may add, so would millions of others&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1908">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Well, that may be so but they are not here now and you see you have also explained to your counsel when you gave evidence that look it is a mindset and you know the mindset is there, you do not have to reconfirm these things, you know it is there&quot; - &quot;Correct&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1909">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;And you know that accused number one has got a mindset as you&quot;? - &quot;Correct&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1910">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Yes, and your husband too as far as the politics are concerned&quot; - &quot;Absolutely&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1911">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Yes, so there is this communality between the three of you, that you all have the same political mindset that active resistance is something that you would grab too if necessary&quot; - &quot;Yes, as I repeat Sir, ourselves and everybody else in the Conservative Party&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1912">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Are you happy with those answers?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1913">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1914">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And at that time you were not trying to dissociate yourself from murder, were you or were you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1915">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No, I made no decision about associating myself or dissociating myself with murder, murder in prinicple or this particular crime.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1916">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1917" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1918">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, excuse me, where is Mr Bizos reading from now?  What page Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1919">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible] line 11.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1920">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1921">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Did you follow it or must I start again Mrs Derby-Lewis?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1922">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1923">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR BIZOS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1924" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Yes, now it seems to me Mrs Derby-Lewis, that you find yourself in a rather difficult position.  I want to suggest to you that only did you have to fight off the possible yoke of communism and tyranny but you also had to fight off the National Government which in your - in the way it is put here in your papers, seems to promote the potential of the yoke and it seems to me you had a war on two fronts&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1925">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Is that fair?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1926">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1927">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR BIZOS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1928" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I would say that the first problem was the National Party&quot; - &quot;Yes&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1929">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Without the National Party the communists would not be here today and it is with the release of the communists by the National Party&quot; - &quot;So&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1930">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;So, my first line of attack will be the National Party&quot; - &quot;Ja, no, not the communists&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1931">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1932">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1933">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1934">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Right.  Now, let us go to page 704, line 10</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1935" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;And of course one way of stopping people in their tracks, would be to take out the leadership&quot; - &quot;No, that is not my style&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1936">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1937">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Yes&quot; - &quot;And it is evidenced in my articles, yes&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1938">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1939">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1940">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1941">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Yes, but that is an option which has been used elsewhere&quot;? - &quot;Yes, but it is not my option, I am a member of the Conservative Party and this is their approach&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1942">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Was that your answer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1943">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1944">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1945">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1946">
			<speaker>JUDGE WILSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, you said it was their approach.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1947">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, but this is how I saw their approach.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1948">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1949">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Can I ask how I am changing that categorical statement, in which way?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1950">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1951" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1952">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1953">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1954">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1955">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>So this statement should really have read</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1956" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Save that the Deputy Leader of the Conservative Party at a Council Meeting said that: &quot;We do not declare our Policy publicly, therefore my Lord - to Judge Eloff, you must accept that there are elements in the Party such - possibly as my husband, Mr Walus and myself, who subscribe to violence but we are not prepared to speak openly about it&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1957">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1958">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1959">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1960">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1961">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, the ANC put out a book: &quot;Forum on Mass Mobilisation&quot;, they never said: &quot;Mass Murder&quot;, they never said: &quot;Mass Killing, Mass Intimidation&quot;, they called it mobilisation and that was their policy, a path to power.  	And nowhere in that book do they decide or did they describe that they are going to murder anybody.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1962">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Have you heard of any Parties - when they go over to violence, adopting a manifesto and forming a separate wing in order separate the people who are prepared to commit violent acts and those who are not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1963">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1964">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Have you ever heard of anything like that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1965">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Of course I have.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1966">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1967">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1968" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;We want to take up arms&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1969">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>What do you take up arms for?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1970">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>I am not interested in headlines in The Patriot ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1971">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Well, The Patriot ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1972">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>I am interested in your evidence ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1973">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>May I finish please?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1974">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Please listen, please ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1975">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>The Patriot is the spokes - is the mouthpiece of the Conservative Party and it is full of that kind of thing - urging the people to do something.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1976">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Do what, to kill people?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1977">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>We must stop, we must stop the ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1978">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Are you saying that The Patriot urges people to kill people?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1979">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1980">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1981" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Hani, Communism and Negotiation&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1982">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>It is part of Exhibit KK and I want to read the last paragraph to you:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1983" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1984">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Did you write that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1985">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1986">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR BIZOS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1987" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Do you think&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1988">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>the question by the Attorney General:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1989" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1990">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I see&quot; - &quot;The fault lies - as I repeat, with the Government&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1991">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Yes&quot;? - &quot;Yes. </text>
		</line>
		<line number="1992">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I think this is fair political comment&quot; - &quot;Yes&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1993">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> &quot;Well, I think Mrs Derby-Lewis, why I refer you to your writings is to show that you held very, very strong views&quot; - &quot;Well, these are and you had now the view of the Conservative - and you had no the views of the Conservative Party&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1994">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Well, you wrote it&quot; - &quot;Yes, but they were approved by the Conservative Party and printed&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1995">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Yes&quot; - &quot;If they did not like these views they would not have printed them&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1996">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;So, could I just summarise your political view as follows:  It seems to me it is fair to put to you that it is your view or it seems to be your view, that sooner or later armed resistance would become a factor of life in this country if the negotiations carry on the way they were carrying at this stage&quot;? - &quot;Yes&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1997">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Are you happy with that answer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1998">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1999">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2000" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;And I think you have also made mention in on or other of your articles that APLA had already declared war on the Whites or against the Whites&quot;? - &quot;Correct&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2001">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="2002">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;And you further believe I understand - if I may put it to you this way, that the Whites there is a psychosis of fear and helplessness&quot;? - &quot;Yes&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2003">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Are you happy with that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2004">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2005">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR BIZOS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2006" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="2007">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Are you happy with that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2008">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2009">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR BIZOS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2010" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;So whilst the taking of a person in peace may amount to murder, when you are at war it does not necessarily need to amount to murder&quot;? - &quot;No, I do not believe that&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2011">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2012">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="2013">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>You said it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2014">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="2015" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Who, whilst the taking of one person - when you are at war it does not necessarily need to amount to murder&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2016">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="2017" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;When you are at war it does not necessarily need to amount to murder&quot; - &quot;No, I do not believe that&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2018">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="2019">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="2020">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="2021">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman with respect, the witness must be afforded the opportunity to explain what she understood by that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2022">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2023">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible] draw the line Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2024">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Let her do it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2025">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="2026">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="2027">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2028" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Where do you draw the line&quot;? - &quot;I do not have the ability or the capacity to make those kinds of decisions, I am a supporter of the Party&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2029">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Do you agree that in the context of those three answers you are giving out to the world that it is the Party that decides whether people should go to violence or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2030">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, in my position as a non-policy maker, yes - as a supporter, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2031">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>And was Mr Walus a policy maker?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2032">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2033">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Was your husband a policy maker?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2034">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2035">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Why was he a policy maker on his own?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2036">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>May I read something to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2037">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>I beg your pardon?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2038">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Answer why?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2039">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="2040">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="2041">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2042">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2043">
			<speaker>MR PRINSLOO</speaker>
			<text>The witness is looking for a particular document which is in her file.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2044">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="2045">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>No, just - the question was: &quot;Why do you say your husband was a policy maker?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2046">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="2047">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>It was because he was elected onto the Executive of the Party.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2048">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="2049">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Bizos?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2050">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>On the next page I actually come to end to this line of cross-examination and you may find that to be a convenient stage.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2051">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2052">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="2053">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>I just read it a quarter of an hour ago and if you will give me three minutes to find - here it is.  This is the extract from The Beeld which we promised to give copies to the</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2054" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;In November last year along with Mr Schalk Pienaar, was elected to the Potgietersrus Management Committee for the CP in place of Mr Tom Langley of Soutpansberg and Kas Uys of Barbeton, the two founder members of the KP.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2055">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="2056">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	The particular committee had to investigate the matter of who the people and who the citizens were&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2057">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>He was elected to form policy for the party.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2058">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>In what respect, whether to go over to violence or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2059">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="2060">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>In what respect and could he change the resolution of the Kimberly Congress on his own, to go over from violence to - from non-violence to violence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2061">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="2062">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="2063">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="2064">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Not fair comment, a statement of fact.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2065">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="2066">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="2067">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>No, n, I do not.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2068">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="2069">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>May I elaborate?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2070">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2071">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="2072">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, but you went into the witness box not only for yourself but to lie for your husband and to give evidence which would be favourable to him in the hope that he would be acquitted.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2073">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>I did not go into the witness box to lie for my husband, I went into the witness box voluntarily.  My attorneys asked me: &quot;Would you like to testify and I said: &quot;Yes, I have nothing to hide&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2074">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>	And it is now when I read through my testimony that I realised that I had and I said to my Advocate: &quot;I would like to bring this up before the Committee immediately.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2075">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Yes, did you think that we might miss it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2076">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text>I beg your pardon?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2077">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>Did you think that we might miss it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2078">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="2079">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>You did think that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2080">
			<speaker>MRS DERBY-LEWIS</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="2081">
			<speaker>MR BIZOS</speaker>
			<text>It may be a convenient stage to go onto another topic on another day Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2082">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Very well, the Committee will now adjourn and resume at 09H30 tomorrow morning.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2083">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>