<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>special</systype>
	<type>Mandela United Football Club Hearings</type>
	<startdate>1997-11-24</startdate>
	<location>Johannesburg</location>
	<day>2</day>
	<names>TATO MOTLANA</names>
							<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=56333&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/special/mandela/mufc4a.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="1377">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker>ON RESUMPTION ON 27.11.1997</speaker>
			<text>DAY 4</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker>PROCEEDINGS ARE OPENED WITH A PRAYER</speaker>
			<text>.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Good morning.  I welcome you again very warmly to this, the fourth day of this hearing of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission.   I thought there  were five of you and now there are four and now there will be three and then there will be two.  But good morning members of the, as you say, now defunct Mandela Crisis Committee.  You know that you are still under oath and we are certain that you will assist us in delving to discover the truth and that you will do so as it were unequivocally with fairly straightforward answers so that we can allow you to stand down as quickly as possible.  It is actually in your hands.  Thank you very, very much.   Hanif are you ready?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>Good morning, Arch.  Yes, we are ready but I notice that the gentlemen and Sister Bernard don&#039;t have the transcripts on the desk.  We will be referring both to the transcripts and Rev Storey&#039;s memo so if you just want me to quote, if you are happy with that, I don&#039;t mind.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker>DR CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, with your permission we need to formally register the apology of Dr Beyers Naude.  We discussed his circumstances and I agreed that we could in fact let him not come.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>Yes, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Of course I mean if there are any questions that you think, I mean there are no sort of direct questions which you can&#039;t answer which will be answered by him.  Thank you very much.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>I am just going to back to one issue.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Yesterday when we began and I quoted you from page 66 of the second section 29 I quoted the statement by Mrs Madikizela-Mandela when I asked about the report to the then president of the ANC, Mr Oliver Tambo.  Her response was as follows:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;With deep regret that document is not owned even by the president, ex members of the Crisis Committee.  I spoke to the present minister of safety and security Sidney Mufamadi.  I spoke to Aubrey Mokoena who is the deputy speaker of the house ...&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Can you just tell me what page is that please?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>Page 66, second section 29.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I spoke to Mr Aubrey Mokoena who was the deputy speaker of the house to try and establish the  authenticity of the so-called document from the Crisis Committee.  Both of them have no knowledge whatsoever of your fictitious document which is so obviously from Stratcom which is what they used to do and have admitted publicly.  You are questioning me on a document which was not even drawn by the Crisis Committee, even during those apartheid times.  You are free to access that information directly from them.  They know nothing about that document and Sidney Mufamadi went so far as to say to me did I not recollect that by the time they are supposed to have issued that so-called document the Crisis Committee had already ceased to exist, it had been dissolved&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Now there was a response to it from both Mr Mokoena and Mr Mufamadi.  I just want to ask some pointed questions on their response.   The first question is as follows.  Did what Mrs Madikizela-Mandela alleged transpired actually transpire and secondly - maybe I should get that response before I follow it up with a question.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, commissioners, my name is Aubrey Mokoena.  Yes, that did transpire.  Mama asked me that question about three weeks ago at the ANC policy conference in Midrand.  That did transpire, she did ask the question.   Or it could have been about - no, not three weeks because there were two conferences.  The first one, ja.  It could be about two months.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>If I could follow this up with Mr Mokoena.  I want to show you a document.  I thought I heard you say yesterday that the document that you were referring to as the Stratcom document was in fact the document allegedly prepared by the mass democratic movement.  Is that the document which you call the Stratcom document?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>No, no, no I am not referring to the Stratcom document.  I am referring to the fact that she asked me a question about the document that was purportedly issued by the Mandela Crisis Committee and in my mind I thought she was referring to the statement that emanated from the meeting which was held in Dobsonville which ultimately came up with statements, with resolutions that were hostile towards her.  Now that nobody must you know deal with her et cetera, et cetera.   So in my mind I thought she was referring to that document and I say that now the Crisis Committee does not own that document and we didn&#039;t engineer that meeting and that is consistent with our</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>submission.  So there was no concurrence of minds concerning the common reference of that particular document.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>You do confirm annexure C, Mr Mokoena, to your submission.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>Sorry?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>You do confirm annexure C to your submission.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>Well that is part of our submission, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>And when you were referring to the Stratcom document that you mentioned to Mrs Madikizela-Mandela what were you referring to?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>I didn&#039;t use the word Stratcom.  I was referring to the fact that the document that I thought she was talking about was that one which basically was (indistinct), not this one which is part of our submission.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker>MR ?</speaker>
			<text>I think the difficulty there is that in your response to a pointed question that was saying when a document in the section 29 enquiry was presented to Mrs Mandela she referred to that document as a Stratcom document and your response seems to say if she was saying that document was a Stratcom document she must have been referring to the Dobsonville document.  Do you understand what our difficulty is?  You were asked a pointed question.  We presented a document to Mrs Mandela at the section 29 enquiry which we alleged was a document owned by the Crisis Committee.  Do you follow?  And what the question put to you was that her response to us was that you as the then Crisis Committee did not even own the document, you didn&#039;t even know about it.  And what she was wanting to establish was whether her response was correct</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>in saying a document which we presented to her as your document was in fact not owned by you.  Now your response was confusing.  It certainly confused me.   Because you went on to say, you were talking about two different documents and in fact she must have been referring to a document emanating from the Dobsonville meeting.  Now there are two things here.  Is it true that what Mr Vally presented to her as your document is that in fact your document.  I heard Mr Mufamadi and he seemed to contend that that is so. </text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>The document that is presented here is part of our submission, it is our document.  But yesterday when the question was asked I explained that when Mama asked that question she did not use the word Stratcom.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker>MR ?</speaker>
			<text>No, no, no.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>And that is what must have caused the confusion because the (indistinct) Stratcom did not come from me at that time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker>MR ?</speaker>
			<text>Let me ask the second question.  Was the Dobsonville document you alluded to in the context of time to respond to the question, to your knowledge a Stratcom document?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>No, the Dobsonville meeting document was not the Stratcom document, it was a document released after a meeting was held.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker>MR ?</speaker>
			<text>Now our difficulty is then did you have any basis to link the question that sought to confirm whether or not she was correct in saying your document was a Stratcom document with the Dobsonville document?   Where is the link between these two documents?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>You see the point is this, that the reference</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>of Stratcom is new to me.  Just like it came for the first time to us yesterday and then that caused that we should have this adjournment because we never knew that there was reference to the fact that that document was a Stratcom document. </text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker>MR ?</speaker>
			<text>But then why did you link it to that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>I didn&#039;t link it to the Stratcom document.  The point I was trying to make was the fact that yes Mama asked me about that document and in my mind I thought that that document that she asked about was that one of - which was a product of a meeting which was held at Dobsonville.  Which meeting troubled her because it took positions that meant that she must be isolated, et cetera, et cetera.   And there was an impression created that that document was sanctioned by the Mandela Crisis Committee.  So I was saying then to be consistent with our submission that document is not owned by the Crisis Committee.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker>MR ?</speaker>
			<text>I am afraid I still don&#039;t understand but then Mr Vally may be (indistinct).</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker>MR MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>Chairman, I want to say that I have no recollection of a discussion between myself and Mrs Mandela about the report which was written by this committee to Mr Oliver Tambo.  I don&#039;t remember any discussion with her about Stratcom.   If she had a discussion with anybody about Stratcom it can&#039;t have been myself.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, Mr Mufamadi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>Can I just before you say that, I think it is important, Chairperson, to actually put it on record that this document Annexure C was produced by members of the committee, that is why we attached it here.  And that in</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>the annexure B on page 2 the paragraph 2 from below until after they left the Mandelas&#039; temporary Diepkloof home, both Mono and Mekgwe persistently maintained that they came to the house willingly and that they were not assaulted.  A confidential letter which was sent to the then president of the African National Congress, Mr O R Tambo, does indicate that save for Katiza Cebekhulu the other two maintained this position until they left the Diepkloof house.  The letter to Mr Tambo was written by members of this committee who were Sidney Mufamadi and Aubrey Mokoena and Sister Bernard.  I am just using a document of 1992 because at that time we referred to the document which was this same document.  And this was a public statement so it was reported publicly.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>We will come back to that document.  All right, I want to go on to where we were when we left off yesterday.  I am now looking at page 88 of the first section 29.  I want to read you an extract from page 88 onwards.  I am saying this in relationship to your - page 2 of your submission where you say the burning of the Mandela house and the origins of the Mandela Crisis Committee.  I understood you to say that after Mrs Madikizela-Mandela&#039;s house was burnt it created an intervention by prominent members of the community who later came to be known as the Mandela Crisis Committee to try and mediate the issue and also assist in rebuilding the house.  I want to put to you what Mrs Madikizela-Mandela said about this issue.  On page 88 I asked the question</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Were you aware of any tension between the Mandela United Football Club and other schools</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>  in the area or football clubs&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Mrs Madikizela-Mandela:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="46" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I know nothing about that, Mr Chairman.  I heard these things in the media&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>I ask:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="48" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;What information can you give us about the attack on your Orlando West home by the Daliwonga students in February 1987?&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Mrs Madikizela-Mandela:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I was hoping someone would come and apply for amnesty and let me know and give me included that information&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>I then asked:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="52" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Do you have no knowledge of what caused them to attack and burn your house down?&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>I am told:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;No, my house was bombed as much as I was bombed in Brandfort.  Three times.  It was nothing new to me because ....&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>I try and interrupt - </text>
		</line>
		<line number="56" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;But in this particular - I beg your pardon&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>And she goes on:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="58" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Because I have been bombed throughout my political life of the time&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>And I ask:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="60" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;But in this particular case, initially at least, a number of youths from the Daliwonga school were in fact charged&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="61">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>I am told:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="62" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I know nothing about that, I was not consulted, I was never told they had arrested some children</text>
		</line>
		<line number="63">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> who were charged.  You can go and check the court record&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="64">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>I then ask:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="65" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Was it not of the burning down of your house in Orlando West that what was referred to in the early stages as the Mandela Crisis Committee and subsequently as the Soweto Crisis Committee, was formed to mediate between the Mandela United Football Club and the scholars from Daliwonga?&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="66">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The response is:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="67" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;No, I know nothing about that distortion of facts.  I don&#039;t know the Crisis Committee to have anything to do with the burning of the house in Orlando.  That is news to me&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="68">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>I ask:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="69" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;When did you know about the Crisis Committee?  This is now Aubrey Mokoena, Rev Frank Chikane, Sister Bernard, Mr Cyril Ramaphosa, Rev Beyers Naude, Mr Sidney Mufamadi?&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="70">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>And there is mention of Mr Murphy Morobe as well.   No, no sorry and then I exclude Mr Murphy Morobe.  And Mrs Madikizela-Mandela asks me:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="71" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Of the Crisis Committee?&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="72">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>I said that is right.  Mrs Mandela answers:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="73" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;No, I think the people who formed the Crisis Committee, the way it was formed would be able to help us in that regard.  I was not part of the formation&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="74">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>And then she goes on to say:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="75" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Nor do I know the particular or the names, I am hearing of them for the first time.  I do know a</text>
		</line>
		<line number="76">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>  Crisis Committee was formed in Diepkloof&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="77">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t know if I need to go on.  But maybe further down that page where the chairperson Mr Ntsebeza asks:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="78" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;You yourself, when did you become aware of the existence of this group of people calling themselves the Soweto Crisis?&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="79">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>And Mrs Madikizela-Mandela says:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="80" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Well some community leaders just came home, I didn&#039;t even know they were in Crisis Committee.  I was not formally informed there was a Crisis Committee formed, nor was I informed where it was informed&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="81">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Sorry, it is probably a typographical error.  Where it was formed.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="82" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;... by whom it was formed.  A group of community leaders did visit me, although I wouldn&#039;t remember all of them&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="83">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>And I ask:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="84" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;When was the first time you became aware of them, was it when they visited you?&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="85">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>And she said:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="86" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Yes&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="87">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> &quot;When was that?&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="88">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>She says:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="89" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Oh, I think it was somewhere in 1989&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="90">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>And I said:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="91" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;In what connection did they come and see you?&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="92">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Mrs Mandela answered:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="93" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;It was in connection with the youths who were in my house&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="94">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>And I asked:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="95" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;What specifically regarding the youths?&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="96">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>And she said:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="97" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;The youths were in the house, they were brought by Falati to my house&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="98">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Finally on this issue, I won&#039;t drag it out much longer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="99" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;We will come back to that.  So regarding the burning down of your house in 1988 did the Crisis Committee have nothing to do with it in terms of trying to mediate to the best of your knowledge?&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="100">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>And the answer I was given is:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="101" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I think the Crisis Committee would be competent to answer this questions&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="102">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>And I persisted, this is now four pages.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="103" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;But did they come and talk to you about it?&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="104">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The answer was:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="105" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;They did come to talk to me.  I wouldn&#039;t remember the details now, it is a long time ago, it was during all those difficult times anyway but there is a court record to that effect and I believe you would have access to it if you want to question us about the Crisis Committee all that is documented&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="106">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Anyway, it went on like that.  The question is it appears as if Mrs Madikizela-Mandela wasn&#039;t aware that you were there to mediate between the youth in her house and the Daliwonga students.  Did you make it clear to her what your proposed role was?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="107">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>I will answer the questions related to that matter and members of the now defunct committee will fill up on that.  If you look at our submission, submission</text>
		</line>
		<line number="108">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>paragraph 6 up to paragraph 19 all of that deals with the matter related to the burning of the house and I do say there that I arrived at the house and found their house burning, felt the consequences of that would be grave and then I convened an urgent meeting of selected group of respected leaders in paragraph 9 in the community who if you look at the background I referred to yesterday were strategically placed in different organisations at that particular moment so it wasn&#039;t a random type of selection.  And the main objectives of this group as I understood it at that moment, and I convened it, was to reach out to the community before midnight to stop any reaction by the community which would lead to further violent acts and possible loss of life.  The second objective was to consider ways in which the Mandela house could be restored to its original state and then we indicate down that submission to say that we did brief everybody we thought would help us to understand why the house actually got burned and in the course of that debriefing we identified people who could be useful on the ground, not the national leaders but people on the ground in the area and we visited a number of houses that night, up to two o&#039;clock in the night.  But if you look at paragraph 3 subsequent to - 13, I am sorry, paragraph 13, subsequent to this a visit was also made to the Daliwonga High School as it was alleged that some of the children from the school were involved in the burning of the house.  That was the reason we were trying to reach out to everybody else and the committee members had occasion with the assistance of the principal, we talked to the principal, the teachers, the SRC to allow us to address the students and we addressed</text>
		</line>
		<line number="109">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>the entire student body of Daliwonga High School.  The committee appealed for calm and was given an assurance that there would be no offensive action initiated from that school.  We wanted an assurance because we didn&#039;t want to see more violence in that situation.  If you continue with that text it then deals with the arrangements for security guards for the house.  The two houses and the group which ended up being called committee managed the process of the reconstruction of the house and Mr Aubrey Mokoena...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="110">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, I just want to know, sorry, just one tiny thing.  You did all these things and Mrs Mandela didn&#039;t know.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="111">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>She knew that this group was in operation because we interacted with her.  At the beginning as I said it wasn&#039;t called Mandela Crisis Committee.  Later in the documents you realise it was called Mandela Crisis Committee.  But we operated - it was quite an operation to - look I have a letter here from Beyers Naude for instance, a note which is sending an account to the Crisis Committee, which says you know there is an account for the security guards addressed to Frank Chikane.  Frank Chikane, Mandela Crisis Committee.  And it attaches the account.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="112">
			<speaker>DR BORAINE</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chikane, I am sorry to interrupt you but really we don&#039;t need to go into all that length.  All we want to know is there is an allegation that Mrs Mandela from herself didn&#039;t know about this committee and either you worked with her or you didn&#039;t. That is all we want to know.  We have read your report.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="113">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I think she knew we existed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="114">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Whether it was called Crisis Committee or whatever but this group existed and handled matters which affected the family at that particular moment. </text>
		</line>
		<line number="115">
			<speaker>MR NTSEBEZA</speaker>
			<text>In particular you came into existence as a response to the burning of her house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="116">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>Exactly.  In fact all the other issues, you know, Stompie and the young people were after the fact.  This was really, the burning of the house was the reason for this group coming together.  The rest of the others, as we referred in a later paragraph where other responsibilities are assumed during the course of our handling the family matters.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="117">
			<speaker>DR BORAINE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Reverend Chikane.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="118">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>If we could go on.  At the bottom of page 2 of your submission you say in the sentence to that paragraph, the first sentence</text>
		</line>
		<line number="119" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;A house of one of the most respected leaders of the people was on fire.  An extreme anger was written all over the faces of the people who came to witness this deed&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="120">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Can you explain when you talk about the anger, was it anger at the burning of the house or was it anger at the occupants of the house?  What anger are you referring to? </text>
		</line>
		<line number="121">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>I refer specifically to the anger of the people I found around the house.  Remember that the people who were around were just community members who saw Mandela&#039;s house burning and came around there.  Didn&#039;t know the circumstances but were just angry that their leader&#039;s house is burning.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="122">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>So they weren&#039;t angry at the occupants of the house, they were angry at the fact that the house was</text>
		</line>
		<line number="123">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>being burnt.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="124">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>Ja, that is what I understood.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="125">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sidney you appear to - you seem anxious to say something.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="126">
			<speaker>MR MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>The problem is that we have got only one microphone and we have to ...   I am sorry that I will take the Commission back a little bit just to make the point that after we were asked by Reverend Chikane to get together and we were briefed about the problem, indeed we did talk to a number of people who we thought could help us understand the origin of the problem.  That, as we say in the submission, includes members of the Mandela family.  I remember quite distinctly that we spoke to Mrs Mandela and we spoke to Zinzi Mandela.  We spoke to young boys who were said to be members of the Mandela United Football Club and it was during that consultation that we were told that the people who were suspected to have been responsible for burning the house were students from Daliwonga, which will then explain why we subsequent went to Daliwonga to speak to the students.  We felt it necessary even before going to Daliwonga High School to seek the commitment of in particular the boys who were introduced to us as members of the Mandela United Football Club, that there was going to be no attempt at retaliating.  Because if we were going to talk to the students at Daliwonga we should then be able to say we have the commitment of members of the Mandela United Football Club that there will be an end to the conflict.  When we spoke to the students, even before we spoke to the students at Daliwonga, as the Reverend Chikane is saying we visited a number of - I wouldn&#039;t even remember some of</text>
		</line>
		<line number="127">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>the names - but young people in the area, especially those who were known to be Cosas activists.  As you were talking to them you would find that yes people were angry for a number of reasons.  One of them was the fact that the house which belonged to the Mandela family was burnt.  But also people were expressing anger about what they considered to be shall I say bullying actions by members of the Mandela United Football Club, which would therefore explain from their side why some students would have been involved possibly in the burning of the house.  So indeed we spoke to the students, we secured their commitment that there was not going to be any offensive action initiated from their side.  We reported this back to the Mandela family, it was necessary that we report that back.  Because there was no way in which we could have achieved what we went out to achieve, namely diffusing the conflict, the tension if we did not report back that the parties to the conflict are willing to end the conflict.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="128">
			<speaker>MS SOOKA</speaker>
			<text>Would you not say that the actions of the Mandela United Football Club went beyond the mere bullying that you talk about and in fact bordered on the criminal, in fact was criminal?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="129">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>As I said earlier, in the course of debriefing the various people allegations to the effect that actions which would border on the criminal were undertaken by members of the Mandela Football Club, those allegations were made to us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="130">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>If this was - and I refer to your statement on paragraph 12 - if this was your I assume preliminary analysis what basis did you have to state in paragraphs 14 and 15 that you intuitively felt there was a third force</text>
		</line>
		<line number="131">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>involved in this conflict?  What objective evidence do you have to state that?  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="132">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>You are starting from the premise here that there was conflict in the country and there were attacks on the Mandela house prior to that.  Hand grenades and other issues and exception.  And then you have a group of young people who then come and congregate around Mrs Mandela and they are alleged to be engaged in certain activities which were criminal in terms of the allegations which were made.  We were suspicious that somebody must be engaged because there was this black on black violence concept.  Somebody must be engaged in creating the conflict to discredit the Mandelas and therefore the liberation movement.  I must also add, Chairperson, that I happened from the SACC point of view, happened to be managing a project through staff which took care of young people who had run away from all sorts of places and in the course of dealing with those children we also found that there were people who infiltrated into those centres to create conflict within.  And so we were bound to be suspicious about it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="133">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>Did you bring this to the attention of Mrs Madikizela-Mandela?  The criminal activity that you are talking about and the possible infiltration by state elements and what was her reaction to that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="134">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t remember us discussing it as an item but it was mentioned in the course of reports and discussions on those matters, that we believed that I mean the young people were in fact infiltrated and that they were dangerous.  That is why we wanted to remove them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="135">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You have not answered a subsequent part of a</text>
		</line>
		<line number="136">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>question, which is what was the reaction to your report. </text>
		</line>
		<line number="137">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>You know the reaction of Mama on these particular issues was for me like a person who is under siege, who felt everybody else around here were enemy, including from time to time the Crisis Committee when you dealt with very difficult issues that it looks like you are turning against me as well and so the reaction was to say you know you are talking like you know the system as such rather than you know deal with the issue and in my opinion that was communicated from time to time we were very concerned about it and that the football club was no good news for the Mandela name in general.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="138">
			<speaker>MR MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>If I could just add there that part of the explanation could be that Mama as a social worker would be clouded by social concerns and sympathy and would not see the wood for the trees.  She wouldn&#039;t see the danger that is hiding behind exactly what she was trying to protect.  She was overcome by - I would say she was overcome by altruism.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="139">
			<speaker>MS SOOKA</speaker>
			<text>I would like to know was she informed in detail about the activities that the Mandela Football Club had been involved in, was she aware of the fact that there were allegations of rape and beatings on the students?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="140">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>Our role as we explained in the submission was not that of a detective nature to systematically look at things and said who did what where.  The overacting role was to manage the crisis, to ensure that it doesn&#039;t really escalate and also our conviction that the Mandela Football Club should actually be removed from that house.  So that was our approach.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="141">
			<speaker>MS SOOKA</speaker>
			<text>I am sorry, Mr Mokoena (indistinct) is was she</text>
		</line>
		<line number="142">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>told about what the football club was getting up to and how the community felt about it?   Because you must have had some basis for insisting that these members of the football club should be removed from the house.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="143">
			<speaker>MS ?</speaker>
			<text>I think that question was answered by Sidney because after our intervention with the students at Daliwonga we came back as to report the findings why the students decided, some of them, to burn the house.  It was also actually (indistinct) that the boys from the club were actually abusing the schoolgirls in the area.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="144">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Now let&#039;s get it straight.  You told Mrs Mandela the (indistinct) football club are, it is alleged, engaged in criminal activities, i.e. rape, et cetera, assault and so on.  Did you say that specifically?  And the answer is yes.  No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="145">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, we gave her a full report of the allegations which were being made by people we debriefed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="146">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  If you look at your last sentence in paragraph 19. In addition to the altruistic motivation that Mrs Madikizela-Mandela may have had in keeping these young people at her house you also state, and I quote</text>
		</line>
		<line number="147" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;She also insisted that the football club was important to her since some of its members served as her security personnel&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="148">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Now in the first section 29 enquiry, page 86 Mrs Madikizela-Mandela was asked this question by me. Referring to the youth at her house.  Referring to Mandela United Football Club youth.  I asked the question:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="149" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Were they ever used as a body guard for example&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="150">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>And the answer was no.   Sorry, maybe I should just give a</text>
		</line>
		<line number="151">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>small context to it, which starts off on page 85.   I asked her regarding Mandela United Football Club:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="152" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Did you provide food, clothing, education, all these amenities to the youth?&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="153">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>And it goes on on page 86, Mrs Madikizela-Mandela:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="154" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Yes I made sure that I got assistance for them&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="155">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>My question then was:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="156" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;In exchange did they have any duties?&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="157">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>And the response was:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="158" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;No, not in exchange for anything.  What could I get from youth?&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="159">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>And I asked:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="160" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Were they ever used as a bodyguard for example?&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="161">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>She said no.  I asked:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="162" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Were they ever used to guard the house?&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="163">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The answer was:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="164" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;They were not used to guard the house for me but they monitored the house for themselves because three-quarters of them would be on the run for one thing or another from the police&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="165">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>That is the first response - that is the response from a section 29 enquiry.  There is an interview with Mrs Madikizela-Mandela on NBC News on the 1st February 1989 and I apologise, Arch, for not sending you a section 30 notice here.  The question was:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="166" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Why then are people like Desmond Tutu then taking shots at you through the football team saying it should be disbanded?&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="167">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Mrs Mandela:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="168" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I am quite surprised at him because he is well aware of the situation back home.  I understand that he made that statement overseas.  Firstly Desmond Tutu knows that I have no bodyguards.  I do not need bodyguards.  I do not need to be protected from my people.  Such reference to the youth (indistinct) from the SACC can only be mischievous...&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="169">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>And then it goes into the whole issue of Paul Verryn.  Did she tell you that she was using these youths as a bodyguard or not is my question.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="170">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>We stand by our submission that ... to remove the lot and arrange.  That is why in one paragraph, I don&#039;t know which one, which where we refer to we offered that we would find other ways of dealing with the security situation because indeed that house was attacked a number of times.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="171">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>Did she ever take up this offer of a private security firm for herself?  You talk about Tulani security guards.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="172">
			<speaker>MR ?</speaker>
			<text>The security - Tulani security guards were for the house, specifically their two houses.   (Indistinct) responsible for securing the services of Tulani security guards to assist in the maintenance of security during that time.  And for which we have just learned now that an account was (indistinct) and also that of construction (indistinct).  Archbishop you interrupted the Reverend Frank Chikane when he was talking about the construction costs which are still due to me.   And all those sub-contractors who assisted me in trying to repair those houses.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="173">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>Can we just emphasise for the record in terms of this question that the two houses which were secured by the Tulani security guards were the one which was burned and was being reconstructed and the new one.  Both of them were not occupied so we made provision arrangements so that the two houses would be secure.  So it wasn&#039;t security guards for herself in this particular case.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="174">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>I want to go to paragraph 22 of your document.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="175">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, paragraph?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="176">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>22.  Page 6.  When did this happen?  When did you first become aware of these allegations and when was denial made by Mrs Winnie Madikizela-Mandela?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="177">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>Let me try to deal with time.  That is very difficult.  After these reports were made - I can&#039;t put a date on it but it was during January, early January.  Members of the committee went to the house in Diepkloof, the Diepkloof residence where Mrs Mandela stayed.  And that is where we explained and we talked to the family first about these allegations of children who were kidnapped and then thereinafter we were allowed to talk with the young people who were alleged to have been kidnapped.  At that time they were still in the house.  Some of them were still in the house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="178">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>I am sorry I am stopping you here.  The reason I am stopping you here is dates are quite crucial because a lot happened in a short period.  I have given you full copies of Bishop Storey&#039;s submissions (indistinct).  If you look at page 24th January 1989. Aubrey Mokoena goes to - I must warn you sorry just for your records, the top of the page says mid-December 1988 and the 28th January should read December, 29th January should read December. Anyway we now - if you look at the item under the 4th January - I will read it out to you</text>
		</line>
		<line number="179" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Aubrey Mokoena goes to Mrs Mandela enquiring about the abduction and is told that he is misinformed.  He does not get to see the children&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="180">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Did this in fact happen? </text>
		</line>
		<line number="181">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>I didn&#039;t go alone, Chairperson.  We went there as a team, it was not individual (indistinct)  except (indistinct) my expertise I would normally go there just to make sure that the material was there in time so that (indistinct).</text>
		</line>
		<line number="182">
			<speaker>MR NTSEBEZA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mokoena I think the question is ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="183">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>If you could just (indistinct) it may sometimes be important that you give explanations but it is a very straightforward question, did you go?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="184">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I went.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="185">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Good, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="186">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>Except that, Chairperson, what follows here is not necessarily true.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="187">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>That is not - they may, if they want to, canvass that they will canvass that but what they want to know is that on that day you went.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="188">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>I wouldn&#039;t remember the day that I went there on the 4th but I went there as I said (indistinct).</text>
		</line>
		<line number="189">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Ja, all right.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="190">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>(Indistinct).</text>
		</line>
		<line number="191">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>Did you ask for and were you refused access to the children?  I shouldn&#039;t say children, I should say did you ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="192">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>Now I have got a difficulty in answering that question because it gives the impression that I went alone and as we have already have seen I would normally not go there alone and say can I see the kids.  It is not usual because I was (indistinct) because (indistinct) that one person (indistinct).  And then if I went there on the instructions of (indistinct) then I wouldn&#039;t (indistinct) to go and worry about the (indistinct).  So an aspect like this (indistinct).  I deny (indistinct).</text>
		</line>
		<line number="193">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mokoena ....</text>
		</line>
		<line number="194">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>... found out earlier that the Reverend Chikane that this youth had been abducted and as a personal friend that you may have gone to the house.   Is that possible?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="195">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>That is not possible.  I was called by (indistinct) and if I had known (indistinct) I wouldn&#039;t have (indistinct) but in this case here (indistinct).</text>
		</line>
		<line number="196">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>So you cannot recall when you first found out when these young people were abducted?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="197">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>(Indistinct).   No, I can&#039;t recall.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="198">
			<speaker>MS SOOKA</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, may I (indistinct).  If I accept that you say that you could not have gone alone and we accept that you (indistinct) I think the question is did you go to the house to ask to see these kids (indistinct) and then were you told that you had been (indistinct) and that in fact you did not get to see the children there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="199">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>That question is out of character because I will say that the matter that we are dealing with was a very weighty one and it was not possible that what (indistinct) can be (indistinct) one person (indistinct) sufficient (indistinct) we decided to avoid such instances where one person may be exposed to one thing and the others not ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="200">
			<speaker>MS SOOKA</speaker>
			<text>I am sorry to stop you in your full flow but I think I said that we accept that you didn&#039;t go alone and that you were working together.  So the second part of my question is did you ask to see the youth firstly, as a group, and then secondly were you told that you had been misinformed.  And then my third question is did you get to see the children.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="201">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>To answer your question yes in the sense of (indistinct) yes we did go there as a group to see (indistinct) and we saw the kids,  I mean the young people, and that is how we began to (indistinct) to find out how they got to come to the place and what circumstances (indistinct) to come there and that is how we even (indistinct) himself and got to know (indistinct) because we say that he broke down and confessed that he was actually working for (indistinct) and that (indistinct).</text>
		</line>
		<line number="202">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>Do you know what date this was?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="203">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>Beg your pardon?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="204">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>Do you know when this was that you met some of the youth and Mr Cebekhulu broke down and told you he was an informer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="205">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>Did I know ....</text>
		</line>
		<line number="206">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>Do you remember which date it was.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="207">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>It is difficult to think of a date (indistinct) notes here.  It must have been in January if I am not mistaken, 1989.  Ja, let&#039;s go over paragraph 25 because  (indistinct) it is difficult to (indistinct) special form.  Yes, it is paragraph 25.   It was the 13th January 1989.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="208">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I just want to (indistinct) about the (indistinct) of the times around when these issues (indistinct).</text>
		</line>
		<line number="209">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I think we accept that and it would be very difficult (indistinct) maybe like Peter Storey putting down in a diary.  I mean we promise that the (indistinct) will be restrained.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="210">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>Can  I ask a question?  I don&#039;t know (indistinct).  We said the reference here to the fact that I went to the Mandela family and (indistinct) the abduction and I was told (indistinct) and I didn&#039;t get to see the children.  Who made this (indistinct).   How would he have known?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="211">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>(Indistinct) want to answer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="212">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>Could he have known this (indistinct).</text>
		</line>
		<line number="213">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>Bishop Storey at this stage was keeping contemporaneous notes and keeping a close eye on the whole situation.  He was in touch with various role players and he advised that he had liaised with the community and not acted on his own (indistinct) issue.  I did ask him the basis on which he kept these notes and this is what he advised me.  But let me just ask that question again.  Did you ever ask for access to the children, Mr Mokoena, and were you able to (indistinct).</text>
		</line>
		<line number="214">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>No, no let me just - I have answered this question (indistinct) but I would just like (indistinct) I also wanted to (indistinct).   Bishop Storey (indistinct) how would he even know - he does not say I left - this statement here doesn&#039;t say I travelled.  It says Aubrey Mokoena goes.  He actually sees me going to Mandela&#039;s house and you know to enquire about the abduction (indistinct) authority.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="215">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>May I just (indistinct).  When Bishop Storey came there he made it very clear that those were notes that he kept from the information that he was related to him by his lawyers, by community leaders, and that by the Crisis Committee and in the context in which if you want (indistinct) to that portion when you read the record you will (indistinct) that he has indicated that he has indicated that he probably got this from me or from any other person.  He never (indistinct) very, very careful in saying all the things that he said except where he personally was involved within that (indistinct).</text>
		</line>
		<line number="216">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>(Indistinct).  I understand (indistinct) very direct and quite outrageous.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="217">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>If I could go on.  Your paragraph 24 it talks of concerns of the community about the whereabouts of the young people when the community was drawn in to help resolve this matter.  Who brought this to your attention?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="218">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The issue of the young people being taken from the manse.  Do you recall who brought it to the attention of the Crisis Committee?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="219">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>Well I need to recollect that the Methodist Church (indistinct) at that time (indistinct) Council of Churches and so they were wanting (indistinct) but there was also communication from (indistinct).</text>
		</line>
		<line number="220">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>Yes, there was communication from members of the (indistinct) who were engaged in (indistinct) and which passed as members of the Crisis Committee and an indication of the expectation that we must use whatever influence we were perceived to have, even our earlier involvement with the (indistinct) to try and (indistinct).</text>
		</line>
		<line number="221">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>One can assume that if the people, the youngsters were taken from the Methodist manse, and the Methodist church had contacted the Crisis Committee and if people from his home town of (indistinct) had contacted the Crisis Committee it would have been early on in the saga, it would be shortly after the youth were abducted.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="222">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>I wouldn&#039;t say exactly when.  Obviously it was as soon as (indistinct).</text>
		</line>
		<line number="223">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>If I go on to your paragraph 25 and you look at page 3 of Bishop Storey&#039;s memorandum and he talks about Wednesday the 11th January and Thursday the 12th January, look at the 12th January.  Chikane reports to PJS, that is Bishop Storey, that</text>
		</line>
		<line number="224" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;... he Aubrey Mokoena, Sister Bernard, Dube and - sorry, and Sidney Mufamadi visited Mrs Mandela on Wednesday the 11th.  She had said she was protecting them and they were not abducted and were there of their own request.   Initially agreed that the committee would have access immediately but later changed her mind and told them to come back later in the day.  Chikane also reports to Bishop Storey serious concern for Verryn&#039;s life&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="225">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>And there is a quote:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="226" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Football team members are ruthless and well armed&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="227">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>It goes on:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="228" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;When Crisis team returned &#039;this time without Chikane&#039;, later on the Wednesday ....&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="229">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>We are still talking the 11th January -</text>
		</line>
		<line number="230" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;... Zinzi Mandela indicated that one of the youths had escaped.  Committee chose to ignore this remark but noted the word escaped.   When access was granted the Committee note that Gabriel Pelo and Ntsebezo had fresh wounds to their bodies.  Katiza did not.  All three youths maintained they were there of their own free will and they were subjected to sexual advances by Verryn.  One of them, however, Katiza, finding himself alone with the Committee broke down under questioning and admitted they were being held against their will and they were going to tell the story of the sexual advances.  He said &#039;I am going to die anyway so I may as well tell the truth&#039;&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="231">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Now the question is firstly your date says the 13th January 1989 and Bishop Storey says there were two visits made by the committee on the 11th January 1989.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="232">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson I (indistinct) and in fact I wouldn&#039;t even (indistinct) find out when actually (indistinct) I would not commit myself and a number of reasons.  We mentioned one which was material (indistinct) subjective so it is a content in that (indistinct) rather than (indistinct) and it would have been a collective of the events that happened which accumulated in that particular way so I wouldn&#039;t really debate (indistinct) the number of times.   We went there a number of times.  I have been there (indistinct) times.  It was a very big (indistinct) so - but I would be very careful, Chairperson, to - I am beginning to get worried like Aubrey Mokoena about (indistinct) taken that (indistinct) may have been (indistinct) because then it will be taking (indistinct) and I am a bit worried (indistinct).</text>
		</line>
		<line number="233">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>Nevertheless at this stage Zinzi Mandela - and if you look at your, I believe it is annexure C, page 2.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="234" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Interestingly Zinzi later told us that (indistinct) had escaped.  She made no mention of Stompie.  This reinforced our suspicions about Stompie.  We also kept mum about Stompie at that stage&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="235">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The question is this, one of the youths breaks down and tells you they had been assaulted - that is Katiza Cebekhulu.  The other two youths have got fresh wounds on their body which you note.  Zinzi Mandela advises you that Kenny had escaped and the fact that she doesn&#039;t mention Stompie concerns you in that you were worried about his whereabouts.  Surely there was some degree of urgency by this stage.  Surely you could have taken more drastic action.  Why didn&#039;t you? </text>
		</line>
		<line number="236">
			<speaker>MR MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>I think it is important to take the context really into account here.  The leadership of the Methodist church told us that the young people were kidnapped or abducted from the church, taken against their will to Mrs Mandela&#039;s residence.  Mrs Mandela maintained to us that they, namely the young people, came voluntarily because they wanted to run away from the situation where they were being sodomised.  Now these are two different versions.  We have no way of knowing in the first instance who was telling the truth.  If we knew that one of them was not telling the truth perhaps the route we would have taken was to informed (indistinct) been important for us to be advised as to what is meant by drastic action.  We spoke - we asked for access to the children.  From the information given to us by the leadership of the Methodist church we were talking about five children.  We were told that one of them is dead, which is where they claimed they got most of their information from about what happened to the children subsequent to them being taken to the house.  (Indistinct) particular person (indistinct) but when we went there we asked to see the children and when they were ultimately brought to us we noted that they brought only three.  But we couldn&#039;t just go there and say we thought there were five because we were trying to understand what is happening.  We were already told that according to Kenny Stompie was so injured after he was assaulted that he had been (indistinct) and Kenny feared the worst could have happened.   Now we are sitting there, Stompie (indistinct) there are three children, here for us their names who are you because we didn&#039;t know them.  And we know that none of them says I am Kenny which means the Methodist church could be right, Kenny has left.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="237">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>We get worried, none of them says I am Stompie.  Then I wouldn&#039;t remember whether it was exactly in the first encounter but what the record (indistinct) is actually true that we were told that somebody, that Kenny had escaped.  I must say that we found it very strange, here are the children that come to Mrs Mandela&#039;s residence voluntarily because they believe that they are safer there, then one of them escapes.  Just one.  (Indistinct) when we personally (indistinct) Katiza started telling us a different version from what they told us (indistinct) and so on.  But it was at a time when we were questioning them one by one in the absence of (indistinct).  We didn&#039;t deem it prudent at that stage to confront Mrs Mandela with what Katiza told us because we knew at that stage in the absence of an agreement between us and Mrs Mandela that we were not going to take the children away with us.  If allegations of assault were true we could not guarantee Katiza&#039;s safety in that sense if we had said this is what he has told us.   We told the Commission in this submission that we are noticed what we thought were (indistinct) marks (indistinct) young people.  They said (indistinct).   If you look at the one report of Mr Tambo (indistinct) but we could not prove (indistinct).  But to some extent we were concerned about what we ourselves could do about the situation.  It is not inconceivable for instance that had we taken them ourselves against their will away from the Mandela residence then possibly we would have been charged with kidnapping ourselves.  I am saying it is not inconceivable because there are the young people (indistinct) why should we take them therefore away from a place in which they weren&#039;t (indistinct).  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="238">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mufamadi, whatever July 1988 you already know that there are some criminal activities being carried out by a group of young people staying at Mrs Madikizela-Mandela&#039;s house, on your own evidence, after the Daliwonga incident when you mediated the issue.  Number 1.   Number 2, a youth who has escaped tells you what has happened.  The fact that he has escaped is confirmed to you by Zinzi Mandela and you merely make a note of the fact that the word escape is used, meaning the people are not held of their own free will.  Number 3, you yourselves observed injuries on them.  Number 4, and this is where I go back to Bishop Storey&#039;s memorandum, page 4, the last paragraph.  Bishop Storey and Rev Verryn meet the Crisis team again at 3 pm.  This is the 30th January, the same date that you give for the meeting with the youth.  Page 4, the last paragraph.  Do you have it?   Okay.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="239" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Bishop Storey and Rev Verryn meet Crisis team again at 3 pm and ask if they could give evidence.  Answer in the negative.  &#039;We don&#039;t have a mandate&#039;.  Aubrey Mokoena counsels very strongly that we should not proceed legally because we would lose without the evidence and Verryn would be the scapegoat.  Major concerns (indistinct) discussion in the safety of the remaining children.  Crisis Committee members more confident about this now because they believe they could no longer be armed because they were needed to establish case against Paul.  Nevertheless if anything moved too precipitously they could be done away with and we would be told they had decided to leave.  Also (indistinct) understanding of any action by the church (indistinct) informed.  Crisis Committee ... &quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="240">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>It goes on on page 5:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="241" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Crisis Committee is (indistinct)&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="242">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>What I am saying and this is what I meant by drastic action, why did you not support the Methodist Church, you people had first hand evidence, Zinzi Mandela told you about the escaping, the injuries, Cebekhulu and (indistinct) escape (indistinct).   Why did you not support them in their application for an interdict to restrain them from assaulting - Mrs Madikizela-Mandela and</text>
		</line>
		<line number="243">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>the Mandela United Football Club as well as (indistinct) Stompie Seipei.   Why did you oppose the attempt by the Methodist church to bring an application on those terms? </text>
		</line>
		<line number="244">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>Firstly I think it is important to say this.  What we are talking about here (indistinct) that come (indistinct), it is not our (indistinct).   I wouldn&#039;t dispute necessarily everything that (indistinct) here.   I wouldn&#039;t remember for instance that at any stage when we were discussing with anybody we said we can&#039;t do that (indistinct).  We explained yesterday that we were not ourselves as this committee constituted by an organisation that would say we will give you a mandate to go to Mrs Mandela&#039;s house at eight o&#039;clock and not at nine.   So we were acting we thought as the collective of the responsible (indistinct) in the community to try and help find a solution to a problem which we thought had certain implications, not just for a family or for a number of families that were immediately affected but for the community at large.  Therefore such discussions as we may have heard with the leadership of the Methodist church were not based on them making this request or that request and we say we accept this, we reject that.  We exchanged views from time to time about how the best possible way of finding a solution to the problem.   I put into this note here Bishop Storey is supposed to have recorded that we said or that (indistinct) in a discussions with us that the major concern throughout these discussions was the safety of the remaining children and I think I did say earlier that yes we were worried about the remaining children.  The point at which we were told about this problem we were told that Stompie was feared dead.  When we interviewed we were not shown Stompie but certainly our action had to take into account the necessity to ensure that they were secure.  The children that we were shown, and I am saying that in the course of further discussions possibly that we told them what we thought would be the best way to go about the problem.  But I think an impression should not be created that when they themselves thought about a better way of solving the problem we became an obstruction because I think that we (indistinct).</text>
		</line>
		<line number="245">
			<speaker>MR MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>Can I just latch on to that by saying that without casting aspersions at everybody who (indistinct).  It is possible (indistinct) to clarify one&#039;s mind.  And as I say I am not casting aspersions so I don&#039;t like (indistinct) direct evidence.  That is why we are here (indistinct) account not (indistinct) which might be (indistinct).  Number 2 is that we (indistinct) for the church as a locus standi (indistinct).  There is nothing that stops the church from issuing any action (indistinct) we didn&#039;t have the locus standi and we (indistinct) they were perfectly within their rights to proceed and not (indistinct).</text>
		</line>
		<line number="246">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson I just want to deal with that question of why drastic action has not been taken.   I agree with Mr Mufamadi (indistinct).   I would like to say, Chairperson, the impression should not be taken that responsible people like ourselves would actually have just (indistinct).  If you note at paragraph 31 of our submission we felt this is of vital importance there are two things which (indistinct).  When we got (indistinct) about that situation we took two actions basically.  One action was to communicate with Mr Mandela himself (indistinct) difficult (indistinct) and I negotiated with the lawyers to communicate this and just to ask Mr Mandela to persuade Mrs Mandela to do the following, hand over the young people alleged to be missing to be community leaders as a way of assuring the community that the youth are still alive because there was a suspicion they were dead, and to allow the Crisis Committee to assist with the dismantling of the club and to relocate its members away from Mrs Mandela.  And 3 make alternative security arrangements for her outside the club members.   And at the same time I was troubled and I took the opportunity to meet Mr Tambo himself and I even suggested, and this is the first time (indistinct) that I suggested a very drastic step.  We don&#039;t have a police force (indistinct).  We believe the police force (indistinct).   But at that time we did not have a police force (indistinct).  Both the police force and the army at the time were (indistinct) and there was no way (indistinct).  And I then said to (indistinct) Tambo why can&#039;t you (indistinct) you know to get these people out of the house.  And that was a very, very drastic thing to say because if we tried we would have had to organise a (indistinct) so it wasn&#039;t as easy as that that we actually ignored the (indistinct).  It was a political crisis of the time that there was no credible police force we could resort to because the same policemen who managed that situation like in the Khotso House bombing I now learned that the policemen who came first to investigate about the bombing was the one who managed the operation.  And so you couldn&#039;t go to that police force and that (indistinct) to we felt the ultimate people in the liberation movement at that time was Mr Mandela himself and Mr Tambo.  And that between them they would find a way of doing whatever they need to do.  The same applies to the bombing of the (indistinct) office in Braamfontein.  The same position, the bomb (indistinct) office in Braamfontein next to the (indistinct) and tried (indistinct) tried to blame us for attempting to blow our own offices and I think Mr Vally you will know that (indistinct) they locked us up together (indistinct).</text>
		</line>
		<line number="247">
			<speaker>MR NTSEBEZA</speaker>
			<text>Can I just ask was an interdict ever discussed with you by Bishop Storey?   Was it ever discussed at any stage, let alone (indistinct).  Did he ever raise the issue of whether you as people who had visited the house and had made the observations that (indistinct).  Did he ever raise the possibility of getting an interdict and did he ever solicit your opinion by way of (indistinct) to support that allegation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="248">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>Well I don&#039;t remember a formal approach of that nature (indistinct) committee members are saying the same.  I have just been advised, Chairperson, that I have used the words remove the young people and that it could be misunderstood.  What I was referring to in particular, you see there were young people amongst the club who were said to me MK members themselves.  And therefore the submission to President Tambo is that if there are MK members in the club why can&#039;t you remove them (indistinct) because they should be under the command of the MK.  Then you deal with the rest of the others easier because they become welfare cases, we can take them to places when the SACC was running centres like (indistinct).  I just wanted to correct it because I will be misunderstood.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="249">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>Also in fairness to Bishop Storey we indicated at some point that we were (indistinct) and sometimes some members of this committee would be at a particular place in the absence of the others and matters would be raised with them and when we do meet together we would share information and so on.  What I noticed here in this particular entry, it was an entry into a diary, is that it is not said as to who from the Crisis Committee he met on that particular day to discuss this matter except that they do make reference to Mr Aubrey Mokoena.  But I am saying that we don&#039;t have the members of the Crisis Committee that he may have met to discuss this with.  And perhaps that will also help if we can try to establish from him who in particular (indistinct) because that can take us forward but as far as we who are here are concerned we are saying we have no recollection of a discussion about an interdict, an discussion in which we said we have no mandate to be of assistance.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="250">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Just to be fair to Peter Storey he is in fact saying that in a - he used the expression (indistinct) that you were not quite certain - you were not the same - it wasn&#039;t the same personnel that he met with because of the exigencies of the period so that is a point he would accept.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="251">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>I want to move on but before I move on just one comment.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="252">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>Sorry Chairperson ...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="253">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>No, no we ought to (indistinct) he has asked a question, unless you are going to answer the question (indistinct).</text>
		</line>
		<line number="254">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>No, no Chairperson, with due respect.  He uses the word team here you see.  On page 4 he says PJS and Verryn meet Crisis team.  Now a team is never one person in my language and that vindicates the point that Mr (indistinct)  is making.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="255">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>Just one comment before I move on to another point, Arch, which is this, that on this particular issue as stands in this memorandum, both Bishop Storey and Bishop Verryn were personally present.  This is not hearsay, this is correct evidence, both of whom have given evidence to us on this issue.  But I want to move on now, Arch.  You have mentioned to us that one of the actions you have taken was in contacting the ANC.  I refer you to page 74 of the second section 29.  74.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="256">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>After having asked Mrs Madikizela-Mandela about the statement made by the ANC, that&#039;s on your earlier page 73 and this is part of your annexure, I believe it&#039;s annexure E, Mrs Madikizela-Mandela answers on page 74,</text>
		</line>
		<line number="257" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I do not know anything about that statement Mr Chairman and therefore I have no such answer for you&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="258">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> I ask,</text>
		</line>
		<line number="259" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Were you ever contacted by the ANC and asked to disband the soccer team?&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="260">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The answer,</text>
		</line>
		<line number="261" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;No I was not&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="262">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> I ask</text>
		</line>
		<line number="263" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Were you ever asked to give an account regarding certain allegations made about the soccer team by the ANC?&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="264">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The response,</text>
		</line>
		<line number="265" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I have just answered you Mr Chairman&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="266">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> I then ask,</text>
		</line>
		<line number="267" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;So the ANC had no contact with you whatsoever regarding the Mandela United Football Club?&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="268">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> Her response,</text>
		</line>
		<line number="269" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;There was no such contact Mr Chairman&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="270">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> I go on,</text>
		</line>
		<line number="271" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Did you ever receive a message from Mr Nelson Mandela via his lawyers, attorney Ismail Ayob regarding the Mandela United Football Club?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="272">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> I have a recollection of Mr Ayob discussing a number of issues with me not specifically on the Mandela United Football Club&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="273">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> I go on,</text>
		</line>
		<line number="274" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I specifically want to know about the Mandela United Football Club, did you ever receive any message regarding the Mandela United Football Club from Mr Nelson Mandela?&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="275">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The answer,</text>
		</line>
		<line number="276" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I did receive a message from Mr Ayob about not necessarily the Mandela United, about the youths who were in my presence.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="277">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> Question,</text>
		</line>
		<line number="278" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;What was the message regarding the youth in your premises?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="279">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> Oh I think Mr Ayob would recollect that, I really have no specific recollection.  He did speak to me as he will speak to me every time he came from visits from Mandela&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="280">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> Let me talk about the first part of it because in your memorandum and as you have repeated if you look at, among others, paragraph 37 page 10 of your submission I beg your pardon, you talk about telephone calls that you received from Mr Oliver Tambo the then President of the ANC where he asks the Reverend Frank Chikane to go to the residence, this is on the 18th of February already, and he also informed Reverend Chikane that he had spoken to Mrs Mandela personally and Mrs Mandela was expecting the Reverend Frank Chikane. Bearing in mind what you say in your submission the statement by Mrs Madikizela-Mandela to the question,</text>
		</line>
		<line number="281" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;So the ANC had no contact with you whatsoever regarding the Mandela United Football Club?&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="282">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> The answer,</text>
		</line>
		<line number="283" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;There was no such contact Mr Chairman&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="284">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>is in direct contradiction to what your submission states.  Would you like to comment on this please?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="285">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>Ja Chairperson our submission stands.  This particular call on paragraph 37 was a very extraordinary call.  President Tambo during that time never communicated with me directly like this calling right in my home in Kimberley but that showed that he actually took this issue seriously and he explained the details to say I am concerned about this situation, if it was possible for me to be there I would go there myself.  I am asking you to go there on my behalf.  So this particular visit was a mandated visit which was a particular instruction.  It was a command, he gave that command in a sense and he said to me, I said to him have you talked to Mama about this because how will she believe me, you know, because I had to ask that and he said yes I&#039;ve talked to her she is expecting you there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="286">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> And then of course when I was there in the house in paragraph 38 which I say lasted five hours, it was a very long discussion, a very difficult discussion, and basically what made it long and Zinzi would remember that because she was partly in the discussion, what made it difficult is that we started talking about annexure - I was confronted with annexure C, and so we couldn&#039;t start talking because of that annexure C.  We spent lots of time dealing with that and at that time I had not consulted with members of the Committee so it was like I just arrived from overseas, and so when we came to the stage where Mrs Mandela then said we will make arrangements for you to get Cebekhulu and etc because he was in a house in Johannesburg here, she then said to me Mr Mandela had already advised that the children should leave the house.  And so that&#039;s as I remember it and I&#039;ve recorded it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="287">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>Let me move on to another issue.  You&#039;ve mentioned a few times that amongst the youths staying at the house there were MK members and this was one of the reasons why you also were contacting the ANC?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="288">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>We were made to - I actually formed that opinion myself that there would be MK members amongst them and because I couldn&#039;t understand how all these young people who could be so risky would be around there, and so I thought the ANC through its own network can sort out this, can say so and so is our member, so and so is not, MK, and recall their members because I was convinced at that stage that even if there was an Umkhonto weSizwe unit there because of the infiltration it would even be dangerous for them and therefore it was important for President Tambo to recall them out of that situation or re-deploy them elsewhere if they wanted to.  And he took the report and I don&#039;t know what happened so I....</text>
		</line>
		<line number="289">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>Mrs Madikizela-Mandela was asked a question, first Section 29 Inquiry page 82</text>
		</line>
		<line number="290" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Were there any members of MK in the Mandela United Football Club?&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="291">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> Mrs Mandela -</text>
		</line>
		<line number="292" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;How could cadres who have infiltrated back into the country be members of the Football Club?  They infiltrated back into the country and the purpose was in fact to protect them and keep them in safe places, how could they be members of the Club?&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="293">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> I ask,</text>
		</line>
		<line number="294" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Were any of these cadres staying in either of your houses?&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="295">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> The response,</text>
		</line>
		<line number="296" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Which cadres?&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="297">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> I ask,</text>
		</line>
		<line number="298" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;The cadres who had infiltrated the country, the MK guerrillas&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="299">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> Mrs Madikizela-Mandela,</text>
		</line>
		<line number="300" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Mr Chairman that would be the height of madness to keep an infiltrating soldier in that kind of house which was a police station, that would have been suicide&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="301">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> What&#039;s your response to Mrs Madikizela-Mandela&#039;s allegation that she didn&#039;t have any MK people at either of her houses?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="302">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>Well I must answer the question, I said that I didn&#039;t know who was an MK member, I had no way of knowing that, but I formed an opinion that there could have been because in terms of security of Mrs Mandela it couldn&#039;t be that just ordinary people would be walking around, it was too difficult those days to do that.  Even for myself during those days, I mean there were people who came when I appeared in a hit list and the community arranged for people to be around my house.  So the days were themselves difficult and so I was saying to President Tambo, through your own network you know who you have deployed, if there are people who are in MK their lives are in danger anyway, I mean they shouldn&#039;t be there and therefore needs to be withdrawn from there, so I can&#039;t confirm and say so and so was you know MK member and etc.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="303">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>Let me move on to another issue.  Paragraph 33 of your submission, this is the visit by the Crisis Committee on the 14th of January to Dr Asvat.  What we would like to know is we know that Katiza Cebekhulu was taken to Dr Asvat by Mrs Madikizela-Mandela and I think there were other people accompanying her, but it&#039;s not contested, did Dr Asvat tell you about the visit to his surgery by Katiza Cebekhulu?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="304">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>No he didn&#039;t but perhaps what is important to explain here is that we went to him and we asked him if he had seen the children, so Katiza would have been one of them, and if he then medically examined them, and if he would be in a position to confirm either that they were assaulted or that they were sodomised, and he denied having seen the children for those purposes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="305">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Do you think we should take the tea break?  Alright let&#039;s break until a quarter to eleven.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="306">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>HEARING ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="307">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>ON RESUMPTION</text>
		</line>
		<line number="308">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Order!  Please settle.  Thank you very much.  Hanif are you there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="309">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>I am.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="310">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Dr Boraine.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="311">
			<speaker>DR BORAINE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson.  I know that Mr Vally has moved on and I certainly don&#039;t want to delay the proceedings but I think there is a fairly critical question that I would like to put to you and I would like to refer you to your submission in paragraph 27 on page 7, and then I want to link that with page 2 of annexure C and I will give you the exact paragraph in a moment.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="312">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> What I would like to know is you tell us in your report that you asked the children about the whereabouts of Stompie, do you see that, on paragraphs 27, and they said they didn&#039;t know.  Did you ask Mrs Mandela the same question and did you ask Zinzi the same question and if not why not?  And then in your report to the then President of the ANC you mention, and I quote, </text>
		</line>
		<line number="313" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Interestingly Zinzi later told us that Kenny had escaped.  She made no mention of Stompie.  This reinforced our suspicions about Stompie&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="314">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Did you raise this with her then?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="315">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> And also could you please explain what you meant when you wrote -</text>
		</line>
		<line number="316" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;We also kept mum about Stompie at that stage&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="317">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>because it does seem to me that a great deal hinges on this very critical question.  Your main concern was the safety of the children, that was your main concern and I am confused as to why you didn&#039;t put these questions when you seemed to think that Stompie was under threat or may even have suffer a worse fate.  Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="318">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>I will try to start where you started which is our main submission, paragraph 27.  We put the question to the children and indeed they said they did not know where Stompie was.  You will recall it was at a time when they would not say they were assaulted, it was at a time when they wouldn&#039;t say they were brought where they were against their will.  Now coming to annexure C ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="319">
			<speaker>DR BORAINE</speaker>
			<text>Could I interrupt you there, if you are dealing with 27 then my question is, having asked the children did you ask either Mrs Mandela or Zinzi where Stompie was?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="320">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson if I remember well we did ask that question because we had a meeting first with the family and at that time, if I recall, my colleagues will maybe confirm that is that it was indicated that Stompie had you know run away or left or I don&#039;t remember what words were there but it was confirmed at one stage he was not there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="321">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>Ja but perhaps also to explain what appears in our annexure, personally I don&#039;t have a recollection of specifically asking Mrs Mandela about Stompie but I don&#039;t want to say that we didn&#039;t.  At the time when we were still questioning the children closely I think I explained the rationale for our not divulging, even to Mrs Mandela, certain things that we found questionable, because we were looking for the best possible way of getting her co-operation as opposed to getting her to move into the defensive all the time.  So I am saying that would explain why at a particular stage we did not confront her with everything that we thought we knew.  For instance we did not walk in and say where is Kenny?  We asked questions and in the course of asking questions we were given certain answers which reinforced suspicions that we had as we walked into the house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="322">
			<speaker>DR BORAINE</speaker>
			<text>I have a last comment I want to make really is in the form of a question and I really am very sympathetic as to the whole state of affairs in South Africa let alone in that part of South Africa, but looking at it now, bearing in mind what happened to Stompie, have you any views as to whether or not you should have been a little less sensitive and a little more direct and that that may have saved his life?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="323">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>Firstly I think that indeed we wish the time at which we were informed about this problem was a time when everybody was still alive, I am talking about the children, because perhaps that would not have complicated even the situation for us, we would have intervened and the fact of our intervention would have possibly constrained anybody who was thinking of assaulting any other person.  From what we learned subsequently none of the children was assaulted or allegedly assaulted after we had intervened.  So I am saying that I wish we were informed earlier when everybody was still alive and therefore our intervention would have helped matters.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="324">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> So I think if you look at what came out in court it doesn&#039;t appear that our intervention would have saved Stompie because he was no more, I mean if you look at what subsequently came out in court.  But as I am saying I wish we had the possibility to save his life and possibly the lives of others who might have died in a similar way.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="325">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Faizel.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="326">
			<speaker>DR RANDERA</speaker>
			<text>Reverend Chikane I just want to go back to the formation of the Crisis Committee.  You&#039;ve said that it came into existence at the time of the burning of the house and the Daliwonga incident, would it be true to say that there were already rumours circulating in Soweto and elsewhere of the Mandela United Football Club and the activities of that Club, both criminal and otherwise, that as leaders in the community you were aware already, or was it only at that time that you had become aware of the Mandela United Football Club&#039;s activities?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="327">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>I think it&#039;s likely that we were aware as far as I am concerned because the rumours were there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="328">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>Ja I will speak as somebody who was part of the leadership of the Mass Democratic Movement at the time, we were aware of these rumours, but if you look at our submission it was not as if Mrs Mandela was, as far as we knew, a member of this or that affiliate of the UDF whom you could bring into a structure of the UDF and confront her with these allegations.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="329">
			<speaker>DR RANDERA</speaker>
			<text>Can I just come back to the burning of the house and your recommendations subsequent to the burning of the house which was essentially as I understand it, that the Football Club, given your understanding at the time that the Club may have been infiltrated by a third force, the recommendation was to disband the Football Club, now that incident took place in August of 1988 of I am right, the burning of the house.  We now take ourselves to January of 1989, what actually happened to that recommendation?  Because I would also understand as you were communicating with the ANC outside the country, perhaps it was taking place at that time as well, why was the Club not disbanded and why was your influence not brought to bear?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="330">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>Well at that stage I mean I am not sure about our influence on her, but she says - she refused that we remove the children, that&#039;s what our submission says and had reasons for it, and so we couldn&#039;t do much.  We communicated to the ANC and given those dark days it was difficult and so we expected them to resolve the matter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="331">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you. Hanif.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="332">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Arch.  We were at paragraph 33 of your submission and I just want to get clarity.  There is dispute about which date Katiza Cebekhulu was taken to see Dr Asvat together with Mrs Winnie Madikizela-Mandela and Xoliswa Falati, but there is agreement that they were at Dr Asvat&#039;s surgery to examine Katiza Cebekhulu and there is in fact a medical record by Dr Asvat to show this.  Did Dr Asvat deny that he had ever examined Katiza Cebekhulu on this date, the 14th of January 1989 when you people went to see him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="333">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>Well he denied having examined the children and we understood that to include Katiza, but we did not ask him one by one did you examine Stompie, yes or no, did you examine Katiza, yes or no, he denied having seen and examined the children.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="334">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>I want to refer you to the second submission, the second Section 29 Inquiry I beg your pardon, page 79 and 80.  I asked, and I would like your comments on this issue please.  After I had raised the issues of the various statements by the message by the Mandela Crisis Committee to Mr Oliver Tambo and the statement by the Mass Democratic Movement, some of the issues I&#039;ve put to you already.  I asked the question, and if you look at midway down page 79, let me read the whole part</text>
		</line>
		<line number="335" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I put it to you that Mr Ismail Ayob came to you with a message from Mr Nelson Mandela about the same issue...&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="336">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>we are talking about the Football Club,</text>
		</line>
		<line number="337" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;...on the basis of that I am putting to you, was the presence of members of Mandela United Football Club on your premises not an issue of controversy in the community?&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="338">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Mrs Madikizela-Mandela&#039;s answer was -</text>
		</line>
		<line number="339" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I really do not know what sort of an answer you expect from me because there was - that&#039;s right up - there was that Stratcom exercise, all that information and from exercises they had decided to put it in place at the time, now you want me to give a view from a perspective of the communities, how the communities viewed me.  I am unable to say, I do not know what you actually want me to say&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="340">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> I start off saying something and Mrs Madikizela-Mandela continues -</text>
		</line>
		<line number="341" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I was aware of all the....&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="342">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>I am sorry I don&#039;t know if the transcript is bad but this is how it is phrased,</text>
		</line>
		<line number="343" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I was aware of all the write up in the newspapers as has always been the case, even right up to now all the sorts of things that get said&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="344">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> I ask,</text>
		</line>
		<line number="345" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Can you tell me in a yes or no was the issue of the members of the Mandela United Football Club their presence on your premises an issue of controversy?&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="346">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> Mrs Madikizela-Mandela answered,</text>
		</line>
		<line number="347" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;It is those people who felt that that was a controversial issue who would say that.  As far as I am concerned there was nothing wrong with the Football Club&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="348">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> And I start saying something and Mrs Madikizela-Mandela continues -</text>
		</line>
		<line number="349" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;And I am hoping that this in fact, Commission, is going to show us these notorious Football Club members, I am hoping they will appear before you here.  As far as I am concerned, I was concerned that was not my view&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="350">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> If you look a bit further and I mention various groupings of people on page 81 I talk about the Mass Democratic Movement which consisted of Cosatu, UDF, I talked about the statements made in Lusaka by the ANC.  I talked about the message which came from Mr Nelson Mandela and Mrs Madikizela-Mandela&#039;s response is,</text>
		</line>
		<line number="351" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;We would similarly quote to you how Stratcom decided to operate in those days.  We have a document here which can tell you precisely how they operated those days.  I am unable to tell from individuals who was who in the Stratcom fraternity, so I am unable to express any view on that view because this is my belief and this is what has been stated publicly&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="352">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> I need to ask the Crisis Committee as active members of the communities and various political organisations, was the issue of the Football Club and especially their presence on the premises of Mrs Madikizela-Mandela an issue of controversy or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="353">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>It was a controversial issue.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="354">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>My final question, in view of what Reverend Chikane said about the community putting guards at his house, was the Crisis Committee and/or the individual members of the Crisis Committee, were they intimidated by Mrs Madikizela-Mandela?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="355">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>Well this is perhaps one instance where we should be asked to speak one by one.  I was not intimidated.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="356">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>I was not intimidated.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="357">
			<speaker>SR NCUBE</speaker>
			<text>I think Mrs Mandela knows that there could never be the way that she could actually intimidate me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="358">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>I was never intimidated.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="359">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, I am through Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="360">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you very much Hanif.  Mr Semenya.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="361">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson.  Can I in the first instance attempt to deal with various nomenclatures.  In the first place am I correct that Reverend Chikane, when you called various individuals you did not constitute yourself into a committee?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="362">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s true, I brought a collective of people who then in the process became a working group that got called a committee later.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="363">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>And am I correct that you did not necessarily constitute yourselves as a finite group?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="364">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>No it was a finite group, it actually remained the six of us in terms of the this particular operation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="365">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>Finite, not in terms of intention, but it was the group of you who became responsible for what you had meant the group to do?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="366">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>I would say that as our convenor said we didn&#039;t see ourselves as having a final say on issues and we didn&#039;t have a - I will go back to legal parlance, and I am a lay person, to say that we didn&#039;t have a locus standi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="367">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson just to be more direct about that question I will put it the way I understood it because I was the convenor of the Committee, I brought the comrades here into this issue and I believed we had a crisis in our hands and it needed a particular group of people.  And as you can see from their background, they were people who were involved who were coming from different - Release Mandela Campaign, Cosatu, Fedro, MUM etc, so I picked up people I thought had influence in the community to deal with the burning of the house, and they, because of the project of repairing the house ended up staying longer and becoming a formal type of committee with you know accounts being sent to it etc.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="368">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>What I was attempting to establish is you did not go about as a committee representing yourselves as a committee, even when people say we were talking to the Mandela Crisis Committee that&#039;s not how you presented yourselves to people as a committee?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="369">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>No you are right, we did not present ourselves as a committee but when people called us a committee we didn&#039;t think that we needed to engage in debates with them about that issue.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="370">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>And even when you went and discussed with Mrs Mandela you did not announce your presence to say we are addressing you as a Mandela Crisis Committee, am I correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="371">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>I worked on the basis that that was understood, that it is a collective that&#039;s dealing with those issues.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="372">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>No I am just talking about the designation because these descriptions are the ones which in my judgement may be creating the confusion.  Did you say as we speak to you we speak as members of the Crisis Committee?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="373">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>As far as I am concerned I mean we didn&#039;t have to announce that when we did that.  The point is that we had a group of people, it wasn&#039;t the type of group with a constitution etc, that&#039;s not the issue, the issue was you needed a collective which could deal with the issues under questioning.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="374">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>Maybe what I am trying to establish will become apparent.  And your document seems to say that the designation was ordained on you by the media or words to that effect.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="375">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="376">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>Now again if we go back to the timeframe where this thing happened there was none of you people who were openly ANC members, is that correct?  Though all of us we knew but you hadn&#039;t projected yourselves that I am an ANC member, we must understand the context.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="377">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>Well how could we have done that at that time, it wasn&#039;t possible to do that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="378">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>But it was also impossible for certain individuals who are young men to be MK cadres around the house of Mrs Mandela, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="379">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>Ja they would not declare that they were, and in the same way no one would say I am MK, I am in the house of Mrs Mandela.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="380">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>In fact to illustrate the point I am advised that Jerry Richardson is here with a tracksuit of the Mandela United Football Club, today, in 1997.  Now the point I am trying to make is even when the Club was disbanded anybody who saw any of these young children with the tracksuit they would say these are the members of the Mandela United Football Club, is that a fair statement to make?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="381">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>Well I don&#039;t know what they would say, but what I do know is that Jerry Richardson was introduced to us in Mrs Mandela&#039;s house and we were told that he was the coach of the Mandela United Football Club.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="382">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>But the point I am making, with respect, Mr Minister is even today somebody will point him out an say this is the coach of the Mandela Football Club and we know the Club doesn&#039;t exist and we know he is not a coach today.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="383">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>Ja I will say this is a person who was introduced to me then as the coach of the Mandela United Football Club.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="384">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>Yes the point I am trying to make again with respect is, the designation of people was in those loose terms, the designation of people at the time was in those loose terms, he was described to you as a coach of the Mandela Football Club when there was no coaching at the time, would you accept that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="385">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>Well I was not a member of the Club so I wouldn&#039;t have known that there is no coaching.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="386">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>Okay maybe let me put it this way, since you were not a member of the Football Club Mr Minister, as far as our information is concerned Gabriel Pelo, Thabiso Mono were not members of the Football team, at least Pelo says that much, are you able to dispute that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="387">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>I wouldn&#039;t be able to dispute it also because he never at any stage claimed to us that he was a member of the team so I would have no basis to dispute that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="388">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>Were any of these - Katiza Cebekhulu maybe would be a better illustration, was never a member of the Football team, would you dispute that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="389">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>I will say he never declared to us that he was a member of the football team.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="390">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>And is it possible that now that we know he has confessed to certain things, that the deeds would have been ascribed to the Mandela Football Club?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="391">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>Whose deeds?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="392">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>In this example, Mr Cebekhulu.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="393">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>I understand your question to mean that because he confessed to us that he was working for C R Swarts police station in Durban when he came to be associated with the Club the deeds, the negative deeds that occurred there were associated with him, is that the question?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="394">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>That those negative deeds in their community would have been ascribed to Mandela United Football Club even though he was not a football player himself.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="395">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>I would say in hindsight after his confession one would deduce that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="396">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>Now can we just shortly deal with this.  Are you able, Reverend Chikane, to say whether you gained an impression that Mrs Mandela, whether rightly or wrongly, believed that the children had a complaint against Bishop Verryn?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="397">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>That was expressed to us quite forcefully.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="398">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>And I believe that, or let me put it differently, did you confront the children about the allegation whether they were assaulted at the manse, sexually that is?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="399">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>Yes we did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="400">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>And did they confirm that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="401">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>They denied when they were still at the Mandela residence.  But when they were no longer at the Mandela residence - your question was whether they confirmed whether they were sodomised or not?  Just put the question again please.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="402">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>Did they confirm to you that they were sodomised at the manse?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="403">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>Yes they confirmed when they were still at the Mandela residence, but when they came out of the Mandela residence and we met them in Dobsonville at this what I would call, big meeting, because there were representatives of various community organisations, they said to that meeting they were primed to lie, they were not sodomised.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="404">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>Now we know that they have since retracted it, I am trying to test the information as you had it when you went about this issue in the residence.  One you had a version by them that they were indeed sodomised, is that factually correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="405">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>The assertion was made as we have said, it was initially made and subsequently retracted.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="406">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>With respect I am trying to ascertain before we - we know it was retracted down the line, I am trying to measure the understanding of issues at least within the Mandela residence at the time that you were there, that one of two - two things happened, the boys at least asserted that they were sodomised, is that factually correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="407">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>Yes they did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="408">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>Mrs Mandela&#039;s desire to protect them was based on that assertion by them which now later turns to have been false, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="409">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>Well it is correct as far as they have told us because I wouldn&#039;t know how they came to knowing about it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="410">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>And if I understand you said Reverend that there was an occasion when you were with the boys without the members of the family?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="411">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>Ja, that&#039;s true.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="412">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>Even at that stage they hadn&#039;t said what they were saying was a lie?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="413">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>Two of those young people maintained that position.  The person who was you know fluctuating when he was alone was Cebekhulu, but the two others maintained the position.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="414">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>And at the time they make the retraction were they still at the residence or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="415">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>To our knowledge they were no longer at the residence.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="416">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>So it would not have been of any use to tell Mrs Mandela now these people say they have not been sodomised, would logic flow from that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="417">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>There was nothing to be benefited from continuing to say they have retracted because at any rate that discussion was intended to determine whether they were relatively safer at the Mandela&#039;s residence in the light of the allegations and counter-allegations or whether they were relatively safer when they were at the Methodist manse.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="418">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>Now again one understands the political climate at the time and the nature in which communication would have been made during that time, is it factually correct that your communication to the then President of the ANC, Comrade Oliver Tambo, that communication you did not make it known to Mrs Mandela?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="419">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>Ja sure we didn&#039;t feel obliged to say to her we&#039;ve sent a report to Mr Tambo.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="420">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>No I am trying to address an obvious issue that whenever she sees these comments she would then say it cannot be original because the people who it purports it comes from are very close to me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="421">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>We will explain that because if that is what you are trying to get at, Mr Chikane will speak also on this because he said he went to Mrs Mandela&#039;s residence and she confronted him about this report.  I think it will be interesting for you to find out what he said to her.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="422">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> If you look also at Annexure A of our documents you will see that we released, or rather B, you will see that in 1992 on the 18th of April we got together to release a statement and that statement does make reference to this particular document which was a report to Mr Tambo.  So indeed as I said we did not go to her and say we are writing a report to Lusaka, but I am not aware that there was a discussion at least with us in which we said we disown this report to her.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="423">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>I will come to that point whether you disowned it or not.  I am merely asking that neither of these documents were presented to her and said look this is our document, this is what we propose to do with it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="424">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>No we didn&#039;t hand it to her.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="425">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>At the time of Katiza&#039;s disclosure that he would have been working with the police C R Swart did you believe this disclosure?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="426">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>Well we didn&#039;t disbelieve it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="427">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>Did you deem it expedient to divulge this information to Mrs Mandela?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="428">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>Well we didn&#039;t because it was in a context where we thought that there could have been many other cases of a similar kind, but we thought that what we needed to look for was a global solution to the problem.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="429">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>Now with respect Mr Minister you are saying you formed an impression that there may be police operatives who were sowing this disunity and this disunity is causing the community crisis that is there and you now confirm that you have information that one of the boys is a police operative and you don&#039;t make this disclosure to Mrs Mandela?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="430">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>Let me explain myself.  In the course of our discussions with Mrs Mandela about the entire problem of the Football club, I am going back to it for reasons which will become obvious, we did tell her there are allegations coming from various people in the community about the actions of members of the Football Club.  We did say to her we doubt if anybody could vouch for all the individuals that you have around you here.  So I am saying in the context of the earlier discussion we did advise on the basis of these suspicions that we had that perhaps her interest will be best served by her agreeing that the Football Club be dissolved.  I will come to the point I want to make about the issue of Katiza.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="431">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> We said earlier that when Katiza made this confession to us it was not the only issue that he raised with us in that sense confidentially, because he claimed that he participated himself in assaulting the other children and he claimed that the other children were assaulted.  Now we had to work out what to do with all this information that he was giving us and we didn&#039;t deem it prudent at that stage to say to Mrs Mandela this is what Katiza is saying to us, especially because we thought that we did not have the possibility to take Katiza away from the Mandela residence at the time, so we did not know what the consequences on Katiza would have been had we divulged everything that he told us in that sense in confidence.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="432">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>No maybe I couldn&#039;t follow your answer.  I am saying you have the following facts according to you, that Katiza is a police informer, that there are possibilities of a third force operating there.  He confirms that he participated in the assault himself, you now know these three facts, shouldn&#039;t prudence have dictated that you disclose these facts to Mrs Mandela as a reason why these boys must leave?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="433">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>You will appreciate also that Katiza was not the only person we were dealing with, he was one of the three children that we spoke to.  It was his word against the other two children whom he claims to have assaulted and they said to us they were not assaulted.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="434">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>But Mr Minister you are saying yourself you did not disbelieve him, so it&#039;s not a question of credibility.  He has given you a version which you have every reason to believe and this reason precipitates the environment which you are trying to dissolve, why don&#039;t you take this information and say to her Mrs Mandela precisely for this reason isn&#039;t it now convincing data to you that these people must leave the house, maybe the problem would be solved?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="435">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>Ja again I think I must take you into the concrete situation that prevailed then.  We did not disbelieve him, Mrs Mandela herself before she allowed us access to the children she said this is my story, the children came voluntarily, they were not assaulted, they will confirm this to you.  The other two children confirmed her version, Katiza in their presence, in the presence of the other children was saying the same thing as they were saying, it was only when there was a possibility for him to discuss with us confidentially that he started to disagree with the others.  So I am saying in the circumstances that prevailed at the time in our view it would not have been prudent, that is in our view it would not have been prudent to raise the matters in the way that you suggest we should have raised with Mrs Mandela.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="436">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>Well maybe that is your final answer on that subject.  But I seem to hear you use the words with respect very gratuitously. You say now before she allowed us access, had she denied you access before?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="437">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>Well we asked for access.  If you look at - I am just trying to look for the relevant annexure, annexure C page 1.  I will  just read the paragraph you will see it as I am reading it</text>
		</line>
		<line number="438" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;We approached Winnie who promised to give us access to the kids so that we could see them for ourselves.  She immediately asserted that they came to her house voluntarily because they were tired of being sodomised by the priest who was giving them sanctuary.  She promised that the kids would confirm that to us when we see them&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="439">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Then indeed she allowed us access to the children.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="440">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Minister which question are you answering?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="441">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>I am answering your question as to whether she refused us access to the children, I am saying she allowed us access to the children.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="442">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>Can I repeat the question that I put to you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="443">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="444">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>I am saying somehow I read some gratuity in the language you use.  You say before she allowed us access, now I want to know from you did she deny you access?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="445">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>I hope we can go back to the record, I don&#039;t remember using the words before she allowed us access.  Anyway I don&#039;t want to create an impression, if I said so and the impression you gained was that she refused us access.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="446">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson the reality is that we didn&#039;t make an appointment before we arrived there to say may we see the children.  You know there was no such an appointment.  We had to come in into the house and negotiate first and there was this position which said these children were sodomised and we rescued them etc, but we had to enter into a discussion to say may we talk to the children themselves, so it was a process which then led to us being able to talk to the children.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="447">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Could I - I mean I am not asking a question, I am not interrupting, is it a useful thing mainly for us to agree that they were not children.  I mean I think it is probably we are getting ourselves into a bit of a bind ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="448">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>In an African context Chairperson they were children.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="449">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>At 29!</text>
		</line>
		<line number="450">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>Can I maybe move to another area.  According to my information Mr Mokoena there was an occasion when you went to Daliwonga School, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="451">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>That is so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="452">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>At the time there were two young persons who were taken by the Daliwonga students, is that right?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="453">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>Students from Daliwonga?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="454">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>No I am trying to establish the reason why you had gone there, were there two children who were staying in the house of Mrs Mandela who were held by the Daliwonga students?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="455">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>I wouldn&#039;t specifically remember if there were two kids that were taken by the Daliwonga students, but I think what happened was that - our main mission there was to prevent retaliatory action from the Daliwonga students to come back to the house, that&#039;s one thing.  But then what happened when we were actually there Daliwonga students did keep some of those students there, some of the members of the Club in the place, during that time when we were there and we had to negotiate for their release.  They kind of captured them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="456">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>It&#039;s just that it&#039;s today but the allegations of criminal conduct were on either side of the divide, if the young men at the house and the community could be put into two categories?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="457">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>I wouldn&#039;t discount that, I wouldn&#039;t discount that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="458">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>And basically again given that moment, I don&#039;t know you can tell me that I am wrong, the province of your participation in that area was not really to verify whether there has been criminal conduct of this nature and whether it is supported by proper evidence, it was more a question of diffusing that tension wherever the blame lay.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="459">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>Precisely, precisely.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="460">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>Now the question about the young men at the yard, did any one of them aver that they were seen by a doctor?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="461">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>I think particularly Katiza did, but I am not very sure.  To the best of my recollection I think he did aver that they were seen by a doctor not only when we were talking to them as they were still in the residence but I think he repeated that at the Dobsonville meeting.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="462">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>No I am trying to establish about when they were in the residence, did any of those young men confirm to you that yes there was a doctor here?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="463">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>I think that what I remember it&#039;s what Mrs Mandela said to us, but I wouldn&#039;t remember the details.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="464">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>I think what Mrs Mandela said was that she did take Katiza to the doctor which is fair, but what I am trying to establish is whether they doctor came to the residence and my information is not.  Do you own any information inconsistent with mine?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="465">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>No we have no information.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="466">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>No we have no information to that effect.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="467">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>About paragraph 22 of your memorandum or the report may I just confirm that according to the information that was supplied to you, the boys were in the house out of their own volition?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="468">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="469">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, that&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="470">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>According to my information Mr Mokoena is that prior to the occasion of the burning of the house there was a dispute involving the soccer players in the proper sense of the word and some other team whose members belonged to the Daliwonga School, do you recall that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="471">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>Yes I do recall that there was a bit of a rivalry about the name.  You know young people are very impressionable so there are these who felt they also want to share in the name and why should the one group call itself by such a glorious name and not themselves.  So there were these boyish recriminations.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="472">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>What I am trying to confirm is did you gain an impression that the dispute arose out of playing of soccer?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="473">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>I wouldn&#039;t specially remember but I wouldn&#039;t also rule it out because of what I have just said here now that here was a group of youth and you know, or perhaps arrogated to themselves the use or the appellation of a Mandela Football Club and then the other youngsters were jealous about the use of that name which appeared exclusive to the one group and not to the other.  So I wouldn&#039;t rule out the fact that there could have been certain negative events that might have culminated into what you have just said now purely because of the choice of the appellation &quot;Mandela&quot;.  But as I say it was just part of the rumours really, that story that we had informally banned it, so one can&#039;t really crystallise them and say in a formalistic sense that was the case.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="474">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>Am I correct though that at the time even the Daliwonga students themselves carried with them a particular tag like boys from that school were associated with the jack-rolling which was the term at the time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="475">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>I wouldn&#039;t say specifically from Daliwonga school but you see jack-rolling became a plague in the township like the Wire Gang and what not, and so quite a lot of young people were involved in those devious acts.  It was quite possible that some of those might have been Daliwonga students.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="476">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>My information again is long before the burning of the house Mrs Mandela having arrived from seeing Mr Mandela at the time came back and dissolved the team, do you have any information to gainsay that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="477">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>The team was ultimately dissolved but I do not know at what point really, my memory is a bit blurred.  I do remember that she did go to see our father, President Mandela and came back and ultimately the team petered out.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="478">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>But not withstanding there were still the young men who were in that house wearing the Mandela United Football Club outfit, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="479">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>Oh yes they were very jealous of their uniform and you know their outfit and because of the aura surrounding the credibility that this name carried.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="480">
			<speaker>MS SOOKA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Semenya I don&#039;t want to interfere in your cross-examination but I really want to get a clear answer on this, are you Mr Mokoena saying in your evidence that the team was disbanded and that when you visited the house these were just boys who were wearing the Mandela club uniform?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="481">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>No, no that&#039;s not what we are saying, I am not saying that, I am saying the Club petered out, right and when it petered out I do not know at exactly what point it petered out and whether it was immediately after Mrs Mandela had been to see President Mandela or not, and the fact that people kept on wearing you know these tracksuits and so on and so on, even after there was a de facto admission that the Club had been disbanded.  That&#039;s what I am saying.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="482">
			<speaker>MS SOOKA</speaker>
			<text>May I fellow that up with another question.  Then why in your press statement, because I assume this is afterwards, that there is one of the objectives to have the Club disbanded?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="483">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>That it&#039;s a question of communication.  I am responding to a question that is unfolding, the climax of which is the fact that the Club ultimately got disbanded, now what is germane here is, when did it disband, and I don&#039;t recollect precisely when it disbanded.  And I know that Mrs Mandela went to see Mr Mandela about this issue here and subsequently the Club petered out, right.  That&#039;s the one part I am saying.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="484">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> Then the question is asked, am I aware that some of the youth kept on wearing the uniform etc etc, and I say that it&#039;s a, it was a kind of a fashion for them to carry on doing that even if the Club was disbanded because they liked the aura and that was where the resistance was of these youngsters in not wanting to disband because they were basking in the glory of the Mandela Football Club, I mean that&#039;s quite obvious.  There was no ceremony where they burnt all the T-shirts and their uniforms, that&#039;s the point I am trying to make.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="485">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>Ja I think I mean the questions to Aubrey Mokoena are related to events before and thereinafter and some, not all of us would know all that.  From the way in which I recollect these events is that I really didn&#039;t come close to finding out what the Club is doing, who are members of the Club, and where do they play their football, that&#039;s what they were called and we were looking at the collective in the house ultimately, in its totality irrespective of whether one is in the Club or not.  The question for us was the young people in the house where - was our concern, that was the issue, I wouldn&#039;t know when, whether the Club dissolved or .....</text>
		</line>
		<line number="486">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>Now maybe just to tidy up that area a little, when you make the communication and you describe them as a football team on what did you base that description, that they were a football team?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="487">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>Communication in which document on page what?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="488">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>If you look at Annexure C on page 3 there are sub-paragraphs there, the third one reads</text>
		</line>
		<line number="489" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;That the Football Club be dismantled forthwith&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="490">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>When you use that terminology, &quot;The Football Club must be dismantled forthwith&quot;, did you have, as a fact, that there was a football club in existence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="491">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>Ja, you will notice that before that particular paragraph, or rather that paragraph starts with the words</text>
		</line>
		<line number="492" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;The meeting took the following resolutions&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="493">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>So it was a meeting of people who understood that there is something known as the Mandela United Football Club and they felt it must be disbanded forthwith and we were communicating their resolution.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="494">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>No, no I respect that, but I am trying to say that the articulation of the scenario was described in loose terms, now to have the benefit of your presence at that point what was there that you saw that constituted a football team?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="495">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>From my perspective the - I worked on the base there was general reference to the young people there as Football Club, that&#039;s how it started in the first place.  Whatever happened thereinafter, you know the group there was understood as such and referred to as such and maybe loosely so but that&#039;s how we referred to them.  And that&#039;s why we referred to as young people who are in the house etc, and called them Club or whatever, but the point is that from my perspective I was dealing with the totality of the young people who were in that house which was the concern, whatever description they are given.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="496">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>The concession that I am proposing to get is that there was a Mandela Football Club at that time, maybe a loose description of what was happening there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="497">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>Yes it is fair to conclude that way that is ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="498">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Let me just say I lived in Soweto and the fact of the matter is that if there was no Football Club they really not to have gone on wearing - I think that Mrs Mandela should have said the Club is finished, because we continued to see in the community the same uniform that was worn by these boys around her, and I think I mean the concession you are getting, if they give it, is not valid.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="499">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>Well Chairperson I am saying with respect, that today as the Commission is sitting we have somebody who is in prison wearing the same uniform and I don&#039;t know how Mrs Mandela would make sure that he does not wear this tracksuit.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="500">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I am only saying that for the sake of the community, what people, the perception of people, because it was not announced that now this thing, at least I am not aware of it, and even if it was I think I mean that the most straightforward, the most obvious way of telling the community that this thing is finished would surely have been don&#039;t wear things that seem to indicate that we have a football club.  But more than that I think what they were saying really is that it is not good for you that you have got these young people for the kind of reasons that they have given, but I am just saying as it was not just they, it was everybody in the community who believed that there was a Football Club or a Club that had this name.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="501">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>To try and answer that if you will be fair, would be, as I have said that there was no formal ceremony like in the case where an arms cache is discovered and gets confiscated, gets publicly destroyed and so on, in this case here when the Club did desist from operating and petered out there was no formal ceremony of burning all the uniforms which is what the Chairperson is trying to say.  So it&#039;s quite possible as I said that one would observe, one or two people you know in the Football Club outfits like it normally happens in some of the organisations.  It is a symbol.  Like I know I was in SASOL and it was a very long time ago but I am still having a SASOL T-shirt, so it is quite possible and then if I do one or two things that might be traced back to SASOL and then have an impact on that.  So it&#039;s a symbol, a status symbol, you know you must understand that it was prestige for these boys to belong to this Club.  It was some of them with dubious backgrounds thought they could class themselves by merely coming and wearing these uniforms, like Cebekhulu for instance.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="502">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>The point is I think one of the responses was that the presence of the Football Team was a controversial issue, that&#039;s what precipitates this, that was there a team or was it, as the Chairperson says, a perception based on the uniform that was worn at the time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="503">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>Maybe let&#039;s draw an analogy.  We are being referred to in this hearing as the Mandela Crisis Committee, and we are not interjecting at every turn to say don&#039;t call us the Mandela Crisis Committee.  Now we can&#039;t at all times be saying what was perceived as the team was controversial, the fact of the matter is that we are saying, all of us here as this collective, that we were told there are these activities of the Mandela United Football Club which the community finds distasteful, that is by some members of the community.   So I don&#039;t know whether the request is that at all times when we refer to the Football Club we must say what was perceived to be the Football Club.  We can do that if that is the request.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="504">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>The thing that was so punctilious about appellation I should quickly point out that I am not a deputy speaker in Parliament I am a chairperson of committees in case that is used against me next time you......</text>
		</line>
		<line number="505">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson I have no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="506">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you very much.  Any - Mr Joseph.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="507">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>May I - my surname is Joseph, I represent Mr Cebekhulu and Mrs Nicholson.  May I read to you an extract which I find in a statement prepared by Mr Cachalia and submitted to this particular Commission.  For the purposes of completeness Mr Cachalia is currently employed by the government of the Republic of South Africa as head of the Secretariat for Safety and Security with the Department of Safety and Security.  There is a four page document ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="508">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>No it&#039;s not been presented, it&#039;s just been circulated.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="509">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>Fine, but it exists.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="510">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Ja, I have  - no, no, no, it exists but I don&#039;t think that it is before us as yet.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="511">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>I am only going to read one paragraph and you will understand the purpose if I may do that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="512">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I am not quite certain that I would think that that was fair. I don&#039;t think so.  No, no, you can</text>
		</line>
		<line number="513">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>I would object to that Mr Chairperson, the persons have submitted their statements to us, they are still about to present it to us shortly after these witnesses and to refer to it in this context is both wrong and it&#039;s not in terms of what we are trying to achieve here.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="514">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Let me say no I would want to rule that out.  I don&#039;t think that that would be fair.  You can, if you wish to I mean do so after the particular person has presented his document.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="515">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>... your Commission in trying to resolve the issues which are before you.  The author of it is a an eminent person and I want to - what I propose doing is to set ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="516">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I think, I mean I am afraid that I must say no.  I mean ask your question but don&#039;t refer to that I think....</text>
		</line>
		<line number="517">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>During this period of time when these incidents occurred, &#039;88, &#039;89 there was tremendous dislocation in the society which existed in Soweto.  Street gangs were in existence, people were being assaulted by misdirected youth here and there and everywhere.  The lines of communication between the ANC High Command in Lusaka or wherever existed and the people on the ground was very, very difficult.  It was difficult to control people in Soweto from doing things.  Would that be correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="518">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>I can&#039;t really speak about the ANC from Lusaka controlling people in Soweto.  I think the leadership in Soweto took responsibility for what was happening in Soweto and you will realise that the reference to the ANC were they would be helpful especially with people they were dealing with.  But I was part of the leadership of Soweto, I was in the Civic Association at one stage, we took responsibility.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="519">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>Fine.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="520" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Street committees had been set up and there was very, very little discipline over the people in control of street committees.  Street committees had been set up with proper intentions but there was very little control over the street committees and unfortunately violent acts occurred&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="521">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>Ja well you know I was part of the leadership of the Anti-apartheid movement and I resided in Soweto and I will recall that at all times, looking at the structures that we had established in the community we would be concerned about ensuring that we give the necessary direction.  There were times when our capacity to give direction was impaired and that was during, in particular, the period of the state of emergency.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="522">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>Correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="523">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>But we did not feel that a situation existed in Soweto where we could no longer intervene and at times prevail on loyal members of the movement.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="524">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>At times he would prevail and other times he would not prevail things would take place.  I have no intention to try and embarrass anybody, my only intention is to try to elicit from you eminent people information which could be used by this Committee in order to do their task.  I am not antagonistic.  I accept that everything you say is the truth and that you have no hidden agenda or anything but it is to people like you that we look to find assistance because you were on the ground and you knew what was going on.  And one of the difficulties you had in controlling loyal members of the ANC is manifested by what happened with Mrs Mandela.  You, your Committee, you as individuals formed a view that what was going on in the Mandela household was not in the interest of anybody.  Is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="525">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>Ja we did form that impression.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="526">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>You did not have sufficient authority yourselves to impose any discipline on Mrs Mandela and as a result of that you went to the unusual length of communicating directly with her husband who was in prison and at the same time communicating in writing to the President of the ANC, correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="527">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="528">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>I have read your submissions and the documents and I get the distinct impression that your Committee formed the view that the allegations which were made against Mrs Mandela, primarily by the members of the community whose integrity you accepted and who you&#039;ve excluded as being part of any third force, that their allegations relating to her unlawful acts, I do not want to be specific, we can take that a little further, but in regard to her unlawful acts, when I say unlawful acts let me qualify it and perhaps temper my language,  the unlawful acts committed by young men who paraded about as members of this Club, you were satisfied that they were doing things that were wrong, correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="529">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>It&#039;s a very long-winded question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="530">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>But very easy to understand.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="531">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>Ja but what is the gist of your question because it is so circum locutis?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="532">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mokoena I am trying to avoid getting involved in debates and having problems with language and semantics.  I recognise, I think I understand the purpose of this Commission, now I repeat, your Committee formed the view that the members of the Mandela Football Club, under the tutelage or any other word you want to use to describe their relationship with Mrs Mandela, that these young men were not behaving correctly, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="533">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>Yes that is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="534">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>Let me try and expand on what I mean by behaviour and then I&#039;ll use the word behaviour so as to reduce the length of the sentence and we know what we mean.  Their behaviour included allegations of rape, it included allegations of assault, it included allegations of kidnapping and it included allegations of murder, you came -is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="535">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s true.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="536">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>It&#039;s true inasfar as there were allegations.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="537">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You have to have two answers.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="538">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>No, no, we just want to answer precisely as you are coming that that is true inasfar as there were allegations.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="539">
			<speaker>REV CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>Can I just clarify this issue Chairperson.  That&#039;s why I have been careful when I answer that I say when it&#039;s my own opinion say this is my personal opinion so that, because we are a collective and we remember things differently and were involved in different things, and I have been careful in saying those things which we agree on and we had a common understanding documented and we say so.  But on those issues that are personal opinions we declare that they are.  And we didn&#039;t plan that one person will answer for us.  I think we will try to manage that situation better.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="540">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>My standpoint throughout is to try and elicit from you eminent people information or views that you had arrived at after mature consideration and after consulting with people in the community.  And my lasting impression of the document you sent to the President of the ANC is that you were satisfied in your own mind that this behaviour was taking place, I do not define the word behaviour any longer, that this behaviour was taking place, that you had brought this to the attention of Mrs Mandela, may I pause and ask for an answer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="541">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="542">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>That Mrs Mandela was not prepared to heed your warnings, that you found yourselves at that time as being activists without any recourse to any structure of law, that you at that stage were then forced to go to the leader of the movement and ask the leader of the movement to use his influence to bring this situation to an end.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="543">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s true.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="544">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s true.  I also do not propose to waste time by taking you to documents to show that perhaps my memory is correct.  If my memory is incorrect then forgive me and somebody will correct me.  Mrs Mandela in fact threatened you gentlemen in this way, she was not prepared to heed your warnings and told you that she going to announce that she was going to resign from the ANC.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="545">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>That&#039;s not true.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="546">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>Ja I seem to remember and we can refer to the documents.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="547">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>Yes let&#039;s.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="548">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>At least in one meeting where I was present she did say so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="549">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t remember that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="550">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>I think if you check the statements you will find ...(intervention)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="551">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>Annexure C last paragraph.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="552">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Sorry, Aubrey don&#039;t hit it too hard and please just be careful with the rustling of the paper and so on.  Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="553">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>Annexure C page 4, the last paragraph.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="554">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mokoena I just want to win your confidence, Mr Mokoena the last paragraph of the document</text>
		</line>
		<line number="555" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;She told us.....&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="556">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>and I exclude the words that are unimportant -</text>
		</line>
		<line number="557" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;She told us that she was contemplating holding a press conference in which she will publicly announce that she is resigning from the ANC&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="558">
			<speaker>MIN MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>Ja, as I am saying that I did not quite remember in which annexure this matter would have appeared but I do remember that she told us that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="559">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>I am on your side.  (General laughter)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="560">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>I don&#039;t think it&#039;s a question of sides, it&#039;s a question of the truth.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="561">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>Now I want to do, I am not going to become involved in the detail, I just want to articulate a view that I hold, based on my knowledge of you eminent people and that is this, that you would not have formed a view that members were behaving in this manner without making use of your own reliable sources and there is an illusion in your document to your own sources.  In other words you went to the community, you talked about your information and you were satisfied that there was merit in the allegations against the club, correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="562">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="563">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>Now unfortunately, and once again I restrict my cross-examination ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="564">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You have to move a little expeditiously.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="565">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="566">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="567">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="568">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>In regard to the document which she denied was authentic and which she claimed to be a piece of propaganda created by an agency of the regime, there too she lies.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="569">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text>Well, from the record ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="570">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="571">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, may I with respect state that even as a matter of law, a lie must be a mis-statement of facts knowing the opposite to be correct and ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="572">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="573">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="574">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  She will explain how she ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="575">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="576">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>I take the point.  Not everything I say has to be accepted.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="577">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text>I would like to say that the document is annexed as ...  We have declared that Annexure C is part of the documentation and submission of ...[indistinct]   I really want to say something because in terms of the record as it was read to us - and if I misunderstood I stand to be corrected, in terms of that record Mrs Mandela is supposed to have said that she had a discussion with me and in the course the discussion - on behalf of this Committee, I disowned this particular document which is today annexed to our submission.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="578">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="579">
			<speaker>MR MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="580">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>It is very, very difficult for anyone to understand or accept that a document of that importance presented to a woman who holds the high office that she does and dealing with the personalities who she mentions over here, she say on oath that she spoke to you about the document and according to your evidence she never spoke to you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="581">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="582">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="583">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="584">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text>I may be making a wrong assumption that you are addressing your remarks to the Commission so that they must take your assessment into account when they determine whether the truth ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="585">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="586">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="587">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="588">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>You see, the lapsus linguae  that when you respond to me - even now today, you refer to them in the first instance as children.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="589">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text>Sorry?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="590">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>You refer to them in the first instance ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="591">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text>We did say: &quot;In an African context&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="592">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Order please.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="593">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="594">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="595">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="596">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Joseph ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="597">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="598">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>My information is Kenny Kgase was 29, Pelo was 19, Thabiso was 20.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="599">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="600">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH:</speaker>
			<text>I mentioned to you Archbishop earlier on, you only have to look at me.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="601">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes, but I would want you to have ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="602">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>I and going to abide by your ruling, I will not try and go any further and I have - my colleagues over here will take the matter further.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="603">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>All right, thank you.  Any others over there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="604">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="605">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="606">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> Now, if I may just start by asking - the submission was made to you that the football club had already been disbanded by the time that you had come into the picture and had attempted to mediate in the crisis and my first question is: &quot;Did Mrs Mandela give any of you the impression that the football club had been disbanded&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="607">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="608">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="609">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="610">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>The next question I have is for Mr Mokoena and it arises out of this question - this issue that you raised about notes and so-called diaries that have been presented before the Commission, it particular by Bishop Storey and you indicated that you had some problem with the fact that notes were being presented and you had some difficulty with this that it was not - in your words so to speak, direct evidence.  Could you just explain what was your objection?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="611">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="612">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="613">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>Can we just examine this for a moment?  Did you keep notes of the events as they were unfolding, at the time they were unfolding?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="614">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="615">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="616">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, I think actually most of the questions that you answer could be answered very briefly, could you try to do that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="617">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>As my background as a teacher, thanks.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="618">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="619">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="620">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>Mr Mokoena, if I may just ask you then, if Bishop Storey tells the Commission that at the time the events were unfolding he made notes of these events, do you have any reason to doubt the accuracy of his notes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="621">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, can I with respect say in fairness to the witnesses, it must be pointed to them that one occasion Bishop Storey said there are two incidents under one date and they could not have happened on the same date, so we cannot project those dates to be contemporaneous and as fact necessarily - this information is useful for the witnesses to know.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="622">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>Not only that, I would say human beings are not infallible and with due respect our ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="623">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="624">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="625">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="626">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>I want to refer you Mr Mokoena, specifically to an entry which Bishop Storey made on page 2 of his notes.  He states that Aubrey Mokoena goes to Mrs Mandela enquiring about the abduction and is told that the young people were not at her home.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="627">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>What about it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="628">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>Do you have any reason to doubt the accuracy of that note?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="629">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="630">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="631">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="632">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> I would have gone there in a another capacity as a person who was assisting in the refurbishment and reconstruction of the house.  ...[inaudible] the people were working there, the paint was there, the material, etc., etc., that is explainable.  If this sentence read there that I went there and had a discussion about security and construction, I would never deny it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="633">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="634">
			<speaker>MS SOOKA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="635">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>When did you first obtain information about the kidnapping of the young men from the Methodist Centre?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="636">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible] complete?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="637">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="638">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>I thought it was comma.   We went there as a team - in our submission, to go and find out what was happening.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="639">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="640">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>We have explained - me as an individual or as a group?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="641">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>Well, you as an individual, could you answer for yourself?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="642">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="643">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Can the Committee just answer that question?  When did you first hear of the kidnapping or the rescuing?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="644">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="645">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible]  If you go back to our submission, paragraph 21, you will find that we start that paragraph this way</text>
		</line>
		<line number="646" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;At the end of 1988 and the beginning of 1989&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="647">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="648">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>If we can fix a time, it would have been prior to your meeting with Mrs Mandela on the 13th of January, as you have put it paragraph 25 of your memorandum.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="649">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="650">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="651">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="652">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>That was part of our brief.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="653">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>Is it possible that at that stage you may have raised with Mrs Mandela, the alleged abduction of the young men?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="654">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="655">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="656">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="657">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>If we can just go to the meeting of the 13th of January.  You state in your memorandum that the family insisted that the youths were not kidnapped and they were actually rescued from Reverend P Verryn, is that correct - paragraph 25, do you see that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="658">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>Just bear with me.  Yes, page 45?  Paragraph?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="659">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>25.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="660">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible] go ahead.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="661">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>Was the allegation of the alleged kidnapping and assault, was that put directly to Mrs Mandela?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="662">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>Was the allegation put directly to Mrs Mandela, by who?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="663">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>By the Crisis Committee, by any members of the Crisis Committee?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="664">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>You heard when we started that our approach was a holistic one to try and resolve the conflict and not to be too attacking and antagonistic, I think that was what the Chairperson was saying - our convenor said.  Perhaps you would like him to repeat?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="665">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, we heard allegations - we put them to Mrs Mandela, that is why we wanted to see the children, otherwise there would be no reason to ask for the children, so we did put the allegations - not in a confrontational manner, but we put the allegations to her.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="666">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>Do you recall which of you put the allegations?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="667">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text>Are you saying: &quot;Do you recall in particular in this group put the allegations to her&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="668">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="669">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="670">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Let me just find out now again, how much more have you got?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="671">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="672">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>How many?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="673">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>If I could be allowed five minutes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="674">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="675">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>I would also then ask that my questions be answered perhaps as shortly and as briefly as possible.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="676">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="677">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text>She maintained that the children came to the house voluntarily.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="678">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>Was the allegation specifically put to her: &quot;Look, not only is there a kidnapping here but there are allegations of actual assault on these children&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="679">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text>I think we did put that allegation to her.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="680">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>As a separate allegation?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="681">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text>As a - what would you call it, a set of allegations - we put to her a set of allegations.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="682">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="683">
			<speaker>MR CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="684">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="685">
			<speaker>MR CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="686">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="687">
			<speaker>MR CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="688">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="689">
			<speaker>MR CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>The answer was, these children were removed from that place willingly and that there was no kidnap, no assault, they were brought for safekeeping and therefore those questions were answered.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="690">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>So your answer is that she denied in fact, that there was an assault?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="691">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="692">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, I repeat the witnesses answer just for the sake of absolute clarity.  In fact, ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="693">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>But it is clarity, I mean did she deny - she denied 1, 2.  Why do you want to say then: &quot;Did she deny 2&quot; again?  What is the point of it?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="694">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>The point of it is that this is the first time this allegation - this is the first time this information has come before us.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="695">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Go ahead.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="696">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>If I understand your evidence correctly then, the first time that the assault would have been confirmed to you would have been when you actually saw the young persons?  I see Sister Benedict made a response to my question, I beg your pardon, Bernard.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="697">
			<speaker>SISTER NCUBE</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible] said where because we specifically told you that it was in the Dobsonville community meeting where the children actually told us that they were assaulted.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="698">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="699">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="700">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="701">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>Let me put it on this basis, what you saw of the youths - what you saw when you saw the youths, was consistent with what had been told to you earlier by community members in the Dobsonville meeting, is that not correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="702">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text>It was told to us later.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="703">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>I beg your pardon.  At any rate ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="704">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You have one minute.  Order, order please.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="705">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>Did you enquire about the whereabouts - did you enquire from Mrs Mandela about the whereabouts of Stompie?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="706">
			<speaker>MR NTSEBEZA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="707">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>If I may just establish, what was her response to your enquiry - Stompie?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="708">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="709">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>Did you ask any questions as to ascertain when he had left, when he had last been seen?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="710">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="711">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Ask your last question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="712">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="713">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="714">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Order please.  Is there any other?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="715">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>No further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="716">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Yes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="717">
			<speaker>MR KADES</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, on behalf of the Asvat family - Norman Kades.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="718">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> May I take you to paragraph 25 of your submission and can we look at the sequence in paragraphs 25 and 26.  On the 13th of January of 1989, you visited the residence of Mrs Mandela to assess the situation and you say that you had discussions with the Mandela family.  Can you tell us who were present at those discussions?  Was it Mrs Mandela and her two daughters?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="719">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text>Certainly Mrs Mandela was there, Zinzi Mandela was there, I think Xoliswa Falati was there.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="720">
			<speaker>MR KADES</speaker>
			<text>So may I then ask with regard to the following paragraph, the Committee was informed that some of them were taken to Doctor Abu-Baker Asvat for treatment, who was it that informed the Committee that they had been taken to Abu-Baker Asvat?  Was it one of them that made the statement and they all concurred?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="721">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text>I think this question helps me to remember that Xoliswa was definitely there because Xoliswa and Mrs Mandela are the ones who particularly said that the children were - the young people were taken to Doctor Asvat for treatment.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="722">
			<speaker>MR KADES</speaker>
			<text>And did you understand that to mean that all those who had come from the Manse had been taken to Doctor Asvat for treatment?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="723">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text>Well, that was out understanding at the time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="724">
			<speaker>MR KADES</speaker>
			<text>All the children?  And ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="725">
			<speaker>MS SOOKA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="726">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text>...[indistinct]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="727">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, also I think in my earlier retort by the Committee, they said it was Mandela who said - had taken Katiza to the doctor and not the other way round.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="728">
			<speaker>MR KADES</speaker>
			<text>I assume this is my opportunity to ask the questions Mr Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="729">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="730">
			<speaker>MR KADES</speaker>
			<text>One of the problems facing the Asvat family - with regard to the terrible event that overtook their family, is their inability to have determined information which - what information was in fact factual and truthful and what information was just rumours circulating in the community.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="731">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> The purpose of these questions Reverend Chikane, is an endeavour to ascertain - on what is the last occasion probably that these questions can be asked, as to circumstances - suspicious circumstances or peculiar circumstances, regarding the death of Doctor Asvat.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="732">
			<speaker>MR CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible] Annexure B, page 3.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="733">
			<speaker>MR KADES</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I have that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="734">
			<speaker>MR CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>Annexure B, page 3, where we dealt with that matter in 1992 when our memories would have been better than now, and we say there</text>
		</line>
		<line number="735" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;We were told by Mrs Winnie Mandela, Xoliswa Falati and others that while at the Methodist the young men were abused sexually etc., and we were further told that Doctor Asvat saw the young men and had medical evidence to collaborate these claims - corroborate these claims&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="736">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>As a result of this three of the members who were there, went to see the doctor.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="737">
			<speaker>MR KADES</speaker>
			<text>When you spoke to the children themselves or the youngsters themselves, did they corroborate to you - did they confirm to you, that they had been seen by Doctor Asvat?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="738">
			<speaker>MR CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="739">
			<speaker>MR KADES</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="740">
			<speaker>MR CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>Not that I remember.  When I returned back, that even had already happened and there was no investigation as far as I remember by members of the Committee.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="741">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="742">
			<speaker>MR KADES</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairman.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="743">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> May I just ask you one other question that interests me and that is, during your interviews with Mrs Mandela relating to the abduction or rescue of the boys on the 29th of December of 1988, did she ever tell you that she was in Brandfort on that day?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="744">
			<speaker>MR CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="745">
			<speaker>MR KADES</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible] Mrs Mandela had told you that he was in possession of medical evidence?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="746">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="747">
			<speaker>MR KADES</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="748">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="749">
			<speaker>MR KADES</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="750">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text>Well, I think earlier on we said we did not ask him about individual names of the young people, we asked him about the young people as a group.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="751">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you very much.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="752">
			<speaker>MR KADES</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="753">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="754">
			<speaker>MR SOLLER</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairperson, Peter Soller on behalf of Zekele Mbatha.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="755">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> Mr Minister, in all these years that have gone by, are you suggesting that you ever had the bona fide belief that the killing of Doctor Asvat was not politically motivated for some ulterior purpose?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="756">
			<speaker>MR MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="757">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text>Can you repeat yourself please.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="758">
			<speaker>MR SOLLER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="759">
			<speaker>MR MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="760">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="761">
			<speaker>MR SOLLER</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Minister.  As the present head of the South African Police Services - Head, Minister of South African Police Services, would you be prepared in the fact of an undertaking by Mr Mbatha who as you know received the death sentence for the ghastly occurrence, would you be prepared to reopen and allow Mr Mbatha to tell you what he really believes you ought to know as the Minister involved.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="762">
			<speaker>MR MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>You know, my instruction to the National Commissioner of the South African Police Services is that, should there be a request for any investigation to be re-opened - and that includes this one specifically, the investigation must be re-opened.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="763">
			<speaker>MR SOLLER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="764">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you very much.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="765">
			<speaker>MR MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="766">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="767">
			<speaker>UNKNOWN</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I need more than just two, maybe seven.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="768">
			<speaker>MR UNTERHALTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="769">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>All right.  I think we probably will have to break for lunch and come back at a quarter to 2.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="770">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>COMMITTEE ADJOURNS</text>
		</line>
		<line number="771">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>ON RESUMPTION</text>
		</line>
		<line number="772">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="773">
			<speaker>MR UNTERHALTER</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chair.  My name David Unterhalter and I act for the Sono, Shabalala and Chili families, all of whom have suffered in various ways as a result of the activities of the Mandela Football Club.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="774">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> Perhaps I could begin Reverend Chikane, by asking you a question.  As I understood it, one of your concerns was that the football club could be used by agents of the regime to discredit and even endanger Mrs Mandela, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="775">
			<speaker>MR CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="776">
			<speaker>MR UNTERHALTER</speaker>
			<text>But am I also correct in thinking that you had another concern and that was that members of the football club were actually committing unlawful acts and endangering the community in various ways?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="777">
			<speaker>MR CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="778">
			<speaker>MR UNTERHALTER</speaker>
			<text>So both of these were concerns of you and the Committee in the period that the Committee operated?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="779">
			<speaker>MR CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="780">
			<speaker>MR UNTERHALTER</speaker>
			<text>Now, was it also clear to you as members of the community that there were many and wide ranging concerns and allegations about unlawful conduct by the football club?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="781">
			<speaker>MR CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>I must answer for myself that I had heard some of those allegations especially after the Dobsonville meeting.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="782">
			<speaker>MR UNTERHALTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="783">
			<speaker>MR CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="784">
			<speaker>MR UNTERHALTER</speaker>
			<text>And these complaints were not the complaints of police agents, these were complaints of members of the community, is that not so?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="785">
			<speaker>MR CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="786">
			<speaker>MR UNTERHALTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="787">
			<speaker>MR CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>We have answered that question already.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="788">
			<speaker>MR UNTERHALTER</speaker>
			<text>Could I ask you - just for my purposes, to place that on the record?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="789">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="790">
			<speaker>MR CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="791">
			<speaker>MR UNTERHALTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="792">
			<speaker>MR CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>She denied those allegations.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="793">
			<speaker>MR UNTERHALTER</speaker>
			<text>She denied those allegations.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="794">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="795">
			<speaker>MR CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="796">
			<speaker>MR UNTERHALTER</speaker>
			<text>So it would be true therefore that the club continued in existence at the time when you came later to investigate the incidents around the abduction of the young people and the Stompie incident, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="797">
			<speaker>MR CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="798">
			<speaker>MR UNTERHALTER</speaker>
			<text>No, certainly.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="799">
			<speaker>MR CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>I referred to the young people who were in the house.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="800">
			<speaker>MR UNTERHALTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="801">
			<speaker>MR MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>We requested that the club be disbanded and she refused.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="802">
			<speaker>MR UNTERHALTER</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  And therefore my other question - and perhaps Mr Mufamadi, you could answer it was that at the time that you then came to see Mrs Mandela and investigate the abductions and the young people in the house, at that stage the club was still in existence?  Is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="803">
			<speaker>MR MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="804">
			<speaker>MR UNTERHALTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="805">
			<speaker>MR MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="806">
			<speaker>MR UNTERHALTER</speaker>
			<text>No, I accept that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="807">
			<speaker>MR MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="808">
			<speaker>MR UNTERHALTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="809">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Your five minutes is up but how many more?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="810">
			<speaker>MR UNTERHALTER</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, I need about two to three more minutes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="811">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>All right.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="812">
			<speaker>MR UNTERHALTER</speaker>
			<text>But I am trying to bowl on the wickets.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="813">
			<speaker>MR MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="814">
			<speaker>MR UNTERHALTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="815">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> Now, what I want to ask you is this - just for the record, the Minister nodded his head at that point and assented.   What I really want to ask you is this, it was evident was it not that you actually had to secure the release of these young people, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="816">
			<speaker>MR MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>It is.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="817">
			<speaker>MR UNTERHALTER</speaker>
			<text>And the person from whom you had to secure their release was Mrs Mandela?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="818">
			<speaker>MR MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="819">
			<speaker>MR UNTERHALTER</speaker>
			<text>And therefore you had to have a negotiation with her for that purpose.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="820">
			<speaker>MR MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="821">
			<speaker>MR UNTERHALTER</speaker>
			<text>It was not a situation where you walked into the house, you said: &quot;I believe there are people living here&quot; and the people were just brought and asked whether they wanted to come and go as they chose, that was not the position?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="822">
			<speaker>MR MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="823">
			<speaker>MR UNTERHALTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="824">
			<speaker>MR MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>Yes, and we had to try and be as diplomatic as possible whilst at the same time we needed to be as assertive as possible.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="825">
			<speaker>MR UNTERHALTER</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="826">
			<speaker>MR MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>You can imagine how difficult it was to strike a balance between those things.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="827">
			<speaker>MR UNTERHALTER</speaker>
			<text>Yes.  And you had to strike that balance and be diplomatic because there was one person who held to key to the release of these people and that was Mrs Mandela?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="828">
			<speaker>MR MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="829">
			<speaker>MR UNTERHALTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="830">
			<speaker>MR MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>Sure.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="831">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="832">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="833">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>I apologise Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="834">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="835">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>I wanted to find out the implications of this person who: &quot;held the key&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="836">
			<speaker>MR UNTERHALTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="837">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="838">
			<speaker>MR UNTERHALTER</speaker>
			<text>That might be true in the case of a father to his children but not as between adults.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="839">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="840">
			<speaker>MR UNTERHALTER</speaker>
			<text>Can I just ask one further questions of Reverend Chikane?  You said that you had a five hour ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="841">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="842">
			<speaker>MR UNTERHALTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="843">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> Reverend Chikane, I just want to ask you this, you spoke of a five hour meeting with Mrs Mandela at which meeting the contents of Annexure C was discussed and that was one of the reasons why it took time to make progress, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="844">
			<speaker>MR CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>The discussion was about the document itself rather than the contents thereof.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="845">
			<speaker>MR UNTERHALTER</speaker>
			<text>I understand.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="846">
			<speaker>MR CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>The standing of the document, who released it, how could the Crisis Committee do such a thing etc., that was the discussion and it took quite some time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="847">
			<speaker>MR UNTERHALTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="848">
			<speaker>MR CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>Where is the house, just remind me?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="849">
			<speaker>MR UNTERHALTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="850">
			<speaker>MR CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="851">
			<speaker>MR UNTERHALTER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="852">
			<speaker>MR CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="853">
			<speaker>MR UNTERHALTER</speaker>
			<text>Do you know my client?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="854">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>No, no, no, now I think we should maybe call a halt.  Any other?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="855">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Yes Chairman, thank you.  I represent Mr Jerry Vusimuzi Richardson and I think the Committee knows by now that my client has applied for amnesty for various atrocities including the death of Stompie Seipei, the Sono and Shabalala disappearances and so on - the record speaks.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="856">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> My first question is to Mr Mokoena.  I am correct in remember that you were leader of the Release Mandela at the time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="857">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="858">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="859">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>That is correct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="860">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="861">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>We negotiated what?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="862">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>At the time the beginning of 1989, when you went to the house where Mrs Madikizela Mandela lives, who did you meet with there?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="863">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>We as a collective met with Mrs Mandela and Zinzi.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="864">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>So it was Zinzi Mandela and Mrs Mandela who discussed all matters with you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="865">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="866">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Now, what is correct to say is that - as the Reverend Bishop Story said yesterday, it was very similar to a hostage negotiation where you had to be very, very tactful, very sensitive and very careful as to how you were moving.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="867">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="868">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>However, you agree that it was a very delicate negotiation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="869">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, quite.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="870">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="871">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="872">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="873">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="874">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>And Mrs Mandela certainly took instructions from no-one.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="875">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="876">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="877">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="878">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="879">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="880">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="881">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="882">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Are you suggesting that Mrs Mandela was acting on behalf of somebody else?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="883">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="884">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>As to the football club or the collective of individuals who styled themselves a football club, yesterday when I questioned Bishop Verryn, I put it to him: &quot;How did people come to stay in either the Mandela house or the Methodist Mission house, who referred them to those places&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="885">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible] your sentence about what you asked the Bishop Verryn.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="886">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="887">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="888">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Thank you I am indebted.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="889">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>Just continue, your question was truncated, just continue it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="890">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="891">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text>Quite.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="892">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Now, those were generally displaced and homeless people who needed sanctuary.  Now my questions is, who referred people in need of that accommodation to those various places?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="893">
			<speaker>MR MOKOENA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="894">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Other than to record the assertion that I believe the witness is being evasive and obstructive, I have no more questions.  Thank you Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="895">
			<speaker>MR MILLER</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, just one question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="896">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes please.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="897">
			<speaker>MR MILLER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="898">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="899">
			<speaker>MR MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text>Chairman, I want to start off by apologising to the Asvat family because earlier on I thought that question was being asked on behalf of the Asvat family and I thought it would have been a wrong question if it was being asked on behalf of the Asvat family because of the history of interaction between my department and the Asvat family.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="900">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="901">
			<speaker>MR MILLER</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="902">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Any other?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="903">
			<speaker>UNKNOWN</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="904">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="905">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> The report there is made that: </text>
		</line>
		<line number="906" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;It was initially agreed that the Committee could have access immediately but changed her mind and told them to come back later in the day&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="907">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>If you could perhaps look at that and then see in the next paragraph:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="908" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;When the Crisis Team returned - this time without Chikane, later on the Wednesday etc.,&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="909">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Would you recollect that that was an accurate description of what in fact happened?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="910">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="911">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text>Same here.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="912">
			<speaker>UNKNOWN</speaker>
			<text>If Bishop Storey says: this is a contemporaneous note of what his assessment of the position was, would you have any reason to dispute that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="913">
			<speaker>MR MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="914">
			<speaker>UNKNOWN</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="915">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you very much.  Now my colleague here.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="916">
			<speaker>MR MGOJO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chairperson.  Can I refer the team to Annexure C, the last paragraph, part 1 on page 2.  In your Annexure there seems to a suggestion here that at the meeting at Soweto the two young men Gabriel and Thabiso, did declare to you that they were assaulted by the football club and also they do say that they were not taken to the doctor for treatment but were treated by the members of the football club.  What type of treatment was given to them, did you ever ask?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="917">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="918">
			<speaker>MR MGOJO</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="919">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Hlengiwe.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="920">
			<speaker>MS MKHIZE</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson.  In Annexure B, page 2, number 4, it says</text>
		</line>
		<line number="921" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;He, Katiza before running away from Hammarsdale was working with C R Swart security branch&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="922">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>I would just like to know whether in your in-depth interviews - somewhere you said: &quot;We had to break them&quot;, did he say about the other experiences like for instance, he was coming from Hammarsdale, young people there had been detained, they have been brutalised, they learnt to kill, to do all sorts of things, did he say any other thing about that?  The relevance of that question is around number 1, which we say we have called you because of our interest in understanding the formation of this youth grouping.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="923">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="924">
			<speaker>MS MKHIZE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="925">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="926">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="927">
			<speaker>MS MKHIZE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="928">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Reverend Chikane?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="929">
			<speaker>MR CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>Can I just ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="930">
			<speaker>MS SOOKA</speaker>
			<text>Sorry before you begin, when you answer that question, I wonder if you could just indicate whether if you had passed that information on, something might not have happened to the person concerned because really there was a paranoia out there about informers and I was wondering what impact that had on any of your decisions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="931">
			<speaker>MR CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="932">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="933">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="934">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> There were many questions that were involved, why did both the Inkatha Freedom Party and the UDF reject him?  There were many questions but even when we learnt about a list of informers amongst us, we were careful in handling that type of thing because you could also have information fed in and then you kill each other in the process.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="935">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="936">
			<speaker>MS MKHIZE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="937">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> I for one was left with an assumption which I would like to clear with you, whether were political interests, ambitions and aspirations a factor in not really taking vigorous steps?   I know this issue has been raised but the feeling is that this is an important question and you must explain it.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="938">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="939">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="940">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Dumisa?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="941">
			<speaker>MR NTSEBEZA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="942">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> Reverend Frank Chikane, there is a matter you might assist us with, you recall it on page 11 of your submission on paragraph 40 and you also refer to Annexure D.  And I think the crisp question that I need to ask in connection therewith is the following - we know now - and it has nothing to do with ...[indistinct] but we now know on an objective assessment of all the evidence, that Katiza Cebekhulu was found in a Zambian jail.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="943">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="944">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="945">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="946">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="947">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> As a member of Government and as one who heads Safety and Security, I would like to hear your comments in regard thereto.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="948">
			<speaker>MR CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I arranged to receive Cebekhulu in Braamfontein, took him to the hospital myself and when I arrived at the hospital the police arrived as well because they were either looking for him for other things or they had heard he had disappeared and is missing.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="949">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="950">
			<speaker>MR MUFAMADI</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="951">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="952">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> I am hoping that after the police have appeared before you, we will all understand what exactly happened and what exactly is happening but at the end of the day this Commission will have - in my view, to recommend the next course of action and I want - speaking in my capacity, present capacity because that is the capacity in which you asked me the question, to assure the Commission that the Department of Safety and Security will co-operate with the Commission.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="953">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you very much.  Hanif?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="954">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="955">
			<speaker>MR CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>You say before?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="956">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>Before the 28th of December 1988.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="957">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="958">
			<speaker>MR CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="959">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>Reverend Chikane, when you handed over Mr Cebekhulu to the police, did he indicate to you he was willing to make a statement to the police?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="960">
			<speaker>MR CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="961">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="962">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>Did Katiza talk to you and tell you what had happened in the household of Mrs Madikizela Mandela?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="963">
			<speaker>MR CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="964">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>Do any of you know the circumstances in which Katiza Cebekhulu left the country and ended up in a prison in Zambia?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="965">
			<speaker>MR CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text>I have no idea.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="966">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>That goes for all of you?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="967">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text>That goes for me too.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="968">
			<speaker>SISTER NCUBE</speaker>
			<text>Submission 3.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="969">
			<speaker>MR CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="970">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="971">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>One final question, are any of you aware that on the 28th of January 1989, after the football club was supposed to be disbanded, they appeared at Doctor Asvat funeral in Lenasia in their track suits - a number of young men, accompanied by Mrs Madikizela Mandela in the coaster bus they usually used and driven the usual driver Mr John Morgan.  Are any of you aware of that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="972">
			<speaker>CRISIS COMMITTEE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="973">
			<speaker>SISTER NCUBE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="974">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>Did the Crisis Committee ever take this up with Mrs Madikizela Mandela, that since she was supposed to have disbanded her club by that stage or was your perception that the club had been disbanded - a fallacious suggestion on the part of Mrs Madikizela Mandela?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="975">
			<speaker>SISTER NCUBE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="976">
			<speaker>MR CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="977">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>Moving away from the whole notion of her soccer club that played regular matches etc., ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="978">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>How final is your final?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="979">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>I have two further things to state.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="980">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="981">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> Did you people still note that she was moving around with them - you mentioned up to the point when the leaders were released, was this happening up to that period and can you just give us an indication of the year and the month?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="982">
			<speaker>MR CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="983">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>Very finally, just for the record Archbishop.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="984">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="985">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="986">
			<speaker>MR CHIKANE</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="987">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="988">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> It was a responsibility that would not be envied by anybody to do that and that we did whatever we could do at that stage to save lives, to avoid further lives being lost and there were difficulties in doing that.  We talked to as many leaders as you could find in dealing with these issues and that was the best that we could do at that particular moment.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="989">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="990">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="991">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>We call Doctor Motlana.  Doctor Motlana, the Reverend Otto Mbangula and Father Mkhatsa?  Order please, order, order!  Please can we settle, we are running a bit late and we crave your co-operation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="992">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="993">
			<speaker>UNKNOWN</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="994">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Will you please stand and have the oath administered or an affirmation taken.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="995">
			<speaker>MS SOOKA</speaker>
			<text>Could I ask you one by one to give the Commission your full names please?  Father?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="996">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>Tato Motlana.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="997">
			<speaker>MS SOOKA</speaker>
			<text>Please raise your right hand.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="998">
			<speaker>TATO MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>(sworn states)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="999">
			<speaker>MS SOOKA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, you may be seated.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1000">
			<speaker>DR BORAINE</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, just before we start, we have a statement before us from Doctor Tato Motlana but we have no statements from the other two witnesses, do such statements exist?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1001">
			<speaker>UNKNOWN 3</speaker>
			<text>Yes, they do Chair, they were just given to me about an hour ago.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1002">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Can you just identify yourself please.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1003">
			<speaker>MR MADLOPA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson, the name is Madlopa from a group of attorneys representing Doctor Motlana.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1004">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The question about statements ...[inaudible] Please Piers?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1005">
			<speaker>MR PIGOU</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1006">
			<speaker>COUNSEL</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, before we proceed, is it possible that the statements can be read into the record or are you going to take it for granted that the record will reflect the statements?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1007">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1008">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1009">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1010">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Please do that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1011">
			<speaker>MR MADLOPA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chair, the name is Madlopa by the way Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1012">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1013">
			<speaker>MR MADLOPA</speaker>
			<text>The name is Madlopa.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1014">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Madlopa.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1015">
			<speaker>MR MADLOPA</speaker>
			<text>That is correct Chair.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1016">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1017">
			<speaker>MR MADLOPA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you for this opportunity Chairperson and as it has been explained, Doctor Motlana has in fact prepared a brief statement relating to the invitation that he has received in terms of Section 29 of the Act, that is Act 34 of 1995 and for the record I would appreciate it if Doctor Motlana were to in fact read into the record his statement as his submission.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1018">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Okay.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1019">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR MOTLANA</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1020" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1021" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The formation or/and purpose of the Mandela Football Club</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1022">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The abduction, assault and murder of Stompie Seipei in 1988</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1023">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The abduction and assault on Thabiso Mono, Pelo Mekgwe, Kenneth Kgase</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1024">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The attempted murder of Lerothodi Ikaneng in 1989</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1025">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The murder of Doctor Abu-Baker Asvat in 1989</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1026">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>the abduction and imprisonment of Katiza Cebekhulu in 1991</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1027">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The activities of the mass democratic movement ...[inaudible] Mandela Crisis Committee in respect of any of the matters raised in 1 - 6 above.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1028" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1029">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1030">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>May I start with my relationship with the Mandela family?  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="1031" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I have known Mrs Madikizela Mandela since 1955 when she was then a medical social worker at the Baragwanath Hospital and I was a senior houseman at the hospital.  In around 1958, I became the family doctor of the Mandela family and has been so till 1994.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1032">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> As the Mandela family doctor I have occasion to visit the Mandela residence on various occasions to provide medical assistance to the family and in the process became a family friend which I still am.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1033">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> Insofar as I can recollect, I remember receiving a telephone call form the Reverend Peter Storey regarding allegations that Mrs Madikizela Mandela allegedly made against Reverend Paul Verryn relating to the sexual assault of certain minors by Paul Verryn and was requested to intervene with Mrs Madikizela Mandela in this regard.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1034">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1035">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> At this meeting I recall that the matter of certain minors who were allegedly held against their will at the home of Mrs Madikizela Mandela, being discussed.  At this meeting I was requested by the said members of the clergy as a concerned member of the community and a friend of the Mandela family, to intervene and attempt to have the said minors released.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1036">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1037">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> I had forgotten about all this Mr Chairman, but my wife recalls that a certain gentleman by the name of Richardson brought three minors early one morning during my absence - our house in Diepkloof.  My wife informs that she requested the said Richardson to take the children back to the Mandela residence from whence I would then fetch them later of when I got back from the city - Johannesburg.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1038">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1039">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>That Mr Chairman, concludes my statement.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1040">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.  Now, are there any other points that you want to make?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1041">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>Not at this time Mr Chairperson, thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1042">
			<speaker>MR PIGOU</speaker>
			<text>Chair, would you like the other members to read their statements into the record at this point or would you like to proceed and then let them at the appropriate time?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1043">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1044">
			<speaker>MR MBANGULA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Chairperson.  I would like to request that I am allowed to make a preamble to my statement so that you understand the context out of which we actually visited Mrs Mandela.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1045">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Briefly.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1046">
			<speaker>MR MBANGULA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1047">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1048" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1049">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> It was further reported to me that the stewards did not know what to do as Reverend Verryn was on holiday.  I immediately reported the matter to Bishop Storey, then our district Bishop and he suggested that it would be good if I could attend a meeting by community leaders which was scheduled meet - correction, in the following week to deliberate on the matter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1050">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> I went into that meeting with the following concerns:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1051" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Why were the young men removed from the mission house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1052">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Why or where were they by then?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1053">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>What was the basis of the allegations leveled against Reverend Paul Verryn?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1054">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>What could one do in respect of Mrs Mandela who was and is a member of my church?  This was a pastoral concern.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1055" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Fortunately in that meeting which happened on the 12th of January now, I could not get an answer to my concern.  It became clear that maybe a meeting with Mrs Mandela - as she seemed to be a key person who could through some light on the whole matter, was needed - correction, so that I could provide clarification to the congregants in my ...[indistinct] as there was a deep concern about what was happening around the church at that time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1056">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1057">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> I phoned Mrs Mandela and made an appointment to see her with other members of the clergy, she agreed.  In our discussion with her she informed us:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1058" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1059" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>We asked her about the whereabouts of the young men, she told us that they were safe and sound and she promised that they will be returned to Central Methodist Church in Johannesburg for safekeeping at Bishop Storey.  We prayed and we left&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1060">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.   Father Mkhatsa?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1061">
			<speaker>MR MKHATSA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1062" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1063">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1064">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> Most of my activities took place in Soshanguve, a Black township North West of Pretoria.  During January 1989, Reverend Mbangula of the Methodist Church communicated with me expressing his concern  that certain children had been removed from the mission house belonging to the Methodist Church at Orlando in Soweto.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1065">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> Reverend Mbangula requested me to accompany him and Bishop Manas Buthelezi to visit Mrs Mandela.  On Wednesday, 13th January 1989, we met Mrs Mandela at her home and enquired about the alleged removal of the children from the Methodist Mission Home.  Mrs Mandela informed me, Reverend Mbangula and Bishop Buthelezi that she had been advised that children were being abused at the mission home and that she had decided to take them into her home as protection.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1066">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1067">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>I thank you Chairperson.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1068">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you very much.  Yes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1069">
			<speaker>MR PIGOU</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1070">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1071">
			<speaker>MR MADLOPA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1072">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1073">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1074">
			<speaker>MR PIGOU</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1075">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1076">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1077">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> Is this the same sequence in the bottom of page two of your statement?  Are you referring to a conversation that you had with Peter Storey about the allegations that had been made in the press at that stage?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1078">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1079">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1080">
			<speaker>MR PIGOU</speaker>
			<text>Do you recall whether the conversation is related to the statement that  you have made to the Commission now at the bottom of page two, when you say: &quot;receiving a call&quot;, was it at the end of January after those newspapers articles came out on Sunday the 29th, two days after Doctor Asvat had been shot?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1081">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1082">
			<speaker>MR PIGOU</speaker>
			<text>And could you tell us whether you did go and see Mrs Madikizela Mandela and speak with her particularly about these allegations?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1083">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>I certainly did.  As I state here Mr Chairman, I went to see Mrs Mandela.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1084">
			<speaker>MR PIGOU</speaker>
			<text>And what was the response that you had from her at that meeting?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1085">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>I would say - by hindsight Mr Chairman, that it was very positive.  I think she appreciated the gravity of that kind of situation.  As I say, I said to her: &quot;If indeed you have made such allegations, please desist because the church is about ...[indistinct] the Supreme Court is threatening to have an interdict to stop you from making all these statements.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1086">
			<speaker>MR PIGOU</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1087">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1088">
			<speaker>MR PIGOU</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1089">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1090">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>Most probably Mr Chairman, but the statement that I asked to examine is not correct, I did not ask to examine them.  My mission had been to have them released if possible.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1091">
			<speaker>MR PIGOU</speaker>
			<text>Were you refused access to the children?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1092">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1093">
			<speaker>MR PIGOU</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1094">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>I did not ask for access to the children, I asked that the children be released.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1095">
			<speaker>MR PIGOU</speaker>
			<text>An on what basis did you ask for the children to be released?  Where had you received those reports from?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1096">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>The clergy, from the members of the Methodist Church, Reverend Peter Storey, John Reece and people like that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1097">
			<speaker>MR PIGOU</speaker>
			<text>Did Mrs Madikizela Mandela provide you with an explanation as to why the young men were being held or why they were at her house?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1098">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>The story that has been told to other people was told to me too by Mrs Mandela, that the children were at her house to protect them from the Priest at the Methodist Church.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1099">
			<speaker>MR PIGOU</speaker>
			<text>And were you aware - when you were approached by Bishop Storey and the other people in relation to this to approach Mrs Madikizela Mandela, that there had been a very serious allegation of an abduction and even an assault at the Manse of one of the residents there?  Were you aware of the gravity of the situation when you approach Mrs Madikizela Mandela?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1100">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>No, I was not aware of any kidnapping - as you notice, the word: &quot;kidnapped&quot; does not appear in my statement, I was not aware of that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1101">
			<speaker>MR PIGOU</speaker>
			<text>So you were simply asked to make a general enquiry about some youths that were believed to be staying at the back of the house, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1102">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1103">
			<speaker>MR PIGOU</speaker>
			<text>I want to hinge on this word: &quot;released&quot;, if you were being asked to have these youths released, surely the inference is that they were being held against their will?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1104">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1105">
			<speaker>MR PIGOU</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1106">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>I did not ask for access, I asked for them to be released.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1107">
			<speaker>MR PIGOU</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1108">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1109">
			<speaker>MR PIGOU</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1110">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>My memory is not that good Mr Chairman, all I can say is that I went to Mrs Mandela, asked her to have the children released to the custody of the church or my custody and that subsequently that is exactly what happened.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1111">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1112">
			<speaker>MR PIGOU</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Doctor Motlana.  Tell me, when the boys were released into your custody on the 16th of January, did you notice that there were only two boys or had you been told that there were meant to be three boys and that there was a third boy missing?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1113">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>I thought I took custody of three, the fourth was missing.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1114">
			<speaker>MR PIGOU</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1115">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>I did not.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1116">
			<speaker>MR PIGOU</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1117">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1118">
			<speaker>MR PIGOU</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1119">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1120">
			<speaker>MR PIGOU</speaker>
			<text>Thank you, no further questions for Doctor Motlana.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1121">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1122">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Let me find out.  What do you want me to do Hanif?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1123">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>I think we should deal with all three gentlemen first.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1124">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>That is exactly what I wanted to do.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1125">
			<speaker>DR RANDERA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1126">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I thought so too.  Mr Semenya first.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1127">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, may I for the record state the difficulty I have.  We are now in the fourth day of the hearing and [end of tape] totally difficult to consult in those circumstances, to authenticate the information that is there, to cross-reference the information and my professional responsibility to client, I think with respect, is being compromised.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1128">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Can I say first of all, we labour under the same problem but more - perhaps more is the fact that I would have thought that is there was substantial matters raised that canvassed a whole range of things, perhaps one might take account of what you are saying because I think that most of the time it has been an overnight situation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1129">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1130">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1131">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1132">
			<speaker>DR RANDERA</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson, I wonder if I could just make one comment about this - and I really do appreciate what is being said, we unfortunately only received the statements from the persons concerned ourselves.  If we had them available we would have obviously have tried to make sure that you had them.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1133">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1134">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1135">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Do you want to go on or do you want to have a brief adjournment since I think - I mean they more or less cover - at least two of them cover much the same ground, for you to consult - I mean, a 15 minute break - we could just as well go to tea.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1136">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1137">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1138">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1139">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you very much.  Any others?  Yes Mr Joseph?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1140">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>Doctor Motlana, my surname is Joseph, I represent Mr Cebekhulu and Emma Nicholson.  I have a little difficulty with the language which is used on page 3</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1141" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;I recall attending&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1142">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Page 3, the penultimate paragraph, do you have that paragraph?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1143">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1144">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>Certain concerns - certain matters concerned you and you raised it with Mrs Mandela, I assume that was allegations of abduction or kidnapping and you then simply asked that she release the young adults - you simply asked her to release, is that correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1145">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>...[inaudible]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1146">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1147">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1148">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>The language used - and my learned friend raised with you, people are released when they are held against their will.  Now, when you asked Mrs Mandela to release the children, how did she respond?  Did she respond saying: &quot;No&quot;, did she respond saying: &quot;Yes&quot; or did she respond saying: &quot;They are not held against their will, they are here voluntarily&quot;?  How did she respond?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1149">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1150">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>What was her answer to you at the meeting?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1151">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1152">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>Allow me to ask you one other question.  You refer to these people as children ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1153">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1154">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>You refer to the people who were released as children.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1155">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>I did?  The word used here is minors, not children.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1156">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1157">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, then I regret - I apologise because these were not children ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1158">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1159">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>When did I refer to them as children?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1160">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>Everybody has been referring to them as children.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1161">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>Exactly, but not this man.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1162">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>Not this man?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1163">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>No.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1164">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  I asked the question because as far as I can recall you referred to them.  Now, they were not children, these were young adults and the information we have is one was 29 years old, the other was 19 years old and the other was 20 years old, is that correct?  Are you able to confirm that they were round about that age?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1165">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>I can confirm Mr Chairman, that they were young men.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1166">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>Young men?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1167">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1168">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1169">
			<speaker>MR MADLOPA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1170">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1171">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>You saw nothing about their physical appearance which would have made it incapable for them to leave a Christian Missionary or a Christian home when the particular individual was not present, the individual who was threatening them or the individual who was abusing them?  They were able to walk and they were quite sound and healthy, correct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1172">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>You are asking a doctor you know.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1173">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>I know that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1174">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1175">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1176">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1177">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I think what the purport of it is, did they in fact require protection?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1178">
			<speaker>MS SOOKA</speaker>
			<text>Sorry Mr Joseph, I think the question that we would like to have answered is: &quot;What condition were these boys in when they were handed over to you&quot;?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1179">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1180">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>Let me try and answer your question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1181">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>It is people as eminent as you three gentlemen who will be able to assist this Commission because what you say is accepted without any reservation,  there are other people who give evidence who have obvious reasons not to tell the truth.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1182">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> Now the reason for these four men ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1183">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Order please.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1184">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>having found their way from the Manse to the home of Mrs Mandela, is the allegation that these three young adults were being sexually abused by a cleric who from time to time was not present, was not holding them behind a locked door, did not have a guard looking after them and what we are expected to believe is that in order to save and to protect them from this abuse, these three men were taken to the house of Mrs Mandela where they were being protected. Now, I find that incomprehensible.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1185">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> From what you were able to observe from the physical appearance - a cursory physical appearance of these men, would you say that they were capable of - if they wished to leave the Manse, to have left the Mans on their own free will - from what you saw?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1186">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1187">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1188">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1189">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1190">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>Could they walk away?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1191">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>Oh, they could have walked.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1192">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>Did you carry them from your motorcar anywhere?  Were they able to move about like any healthy man sitting over here?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1193">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>Oh, yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1194">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1195">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, I must say that - all things being equal, that would be the condition - one would say they could have walked away.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1196">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>And they are certainly not children - there is talk of different cultures and use of different words in different cultures, in my culture a child is a person under the age of 10 and 11 - that I would call a child.  Are you happy with that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1197">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1198">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>What would a child be?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1199">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>In my culture children would be much older than that.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1200">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>Okay.  What age ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1201">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1202">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text>I take the point.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1203">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>No, no, let me give you one more ...[intervention]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1204">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1205">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Pardon?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1206">
			<speaker>MR JOSEPH</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1207">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Oh, how wonderful.  Any other?  Yes Mr Richard?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1208">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chair.  Doctor, when you went to see Mrs Madikizela Mandela, was there anyone else with her?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1209">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1210">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>Your negotiations were with her direct?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1211">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1212">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>And it was Mrs Mandela who said yes or no to the children being released?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1213">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1214">
			<speaker>MR RICHARD</speaker>
			<text>No further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1215">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Mr Kuny?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1216">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1217">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1218">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1219">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>That would be about the time.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1220">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1221">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>That is so.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1222">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1223">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>No, I was actually asked by Mr Storey.  As I state here: &quot;The Reverend Peter Storey asked me&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1224">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>Can I just ask you, after you had been to the house, did you then again speak to Bishop Storey and report to him the substance of your visit?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1225">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>I probably did.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1226">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>When you were pressed on this issue about the question of access, your evidence was that you were not refused access to the youths.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1227">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>No, my answer is that I did not ask for access.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1228">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>Are you sure about that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1229">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>Good heavens, what must I say?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1230">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>The witness has answered and I think that you should accept the answer.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1231">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>I press you on that issue because when you were pressed, you said that your memory is not that good.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1232">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>That is so, my memory is not that good, it has never been good.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1233">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>So is it possible that during that visit you actually did ask for access and were refused?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1234">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1235">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>What was your view at that stage about the veracity of the rumours that these boys were being held against their will?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1236">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>I had no proof that they were being held against their will.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1237">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>Would one obvious way of trying to ascertain whether they were being held against their will not have been to have spoken to the boys themselves?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1238">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1239">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>Did you ask Mrs Mandela whether the boys were being held against their will?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1240">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1241">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>And did you request that they be released immediately?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1242">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1243">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>Was it not your intention to secure their release as soon as possible?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1244">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>Clearly, as soon as possible but not immediately.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1245">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1246">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1247">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1248">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>It is here.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1249">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>He states on page 6 of his memorandum at the top</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1250" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;PJS&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1251">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1252" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;John Reece, Sizwe Mbanda see Motlana who has just returned from Lusaka&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1253">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Do you recall that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1254">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1255">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1256">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>I do.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1257">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>And if you look at the following sentence, it says</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1258" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1259">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Do you confirm that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1260">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1261">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>Presumably at this meeting that issue was then discussed?  Do you recall that or not?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1262">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1263">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>I also just wanted to find out.  I thought that largely one would seek to have confined your interest to the interest of your particular client, that the questions would be related to your client but I think you go all over the place.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1264">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1265">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>One.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1266">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>I have one further question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1267">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>One question yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1268">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>I merely want to refer to the next sentence of this memorandum Doctor Motlana and it reads as follows</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1269" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1270">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Do you recall that being confirmed?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1271">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>Which sentence is that?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1272">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1273">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>On page 6?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1274">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>Page 6 of the memorandum.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1275">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR MOTLANA</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1276" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Motlana sees Winnie&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1277">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1278">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1279">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR MOTLANA</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1280" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;PJS informs Mbangula at 6 p.m. of official withdrawal of Verryn from Soweto on leave&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1281">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1282">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>Where are you then?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1283">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1284">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, it is page 6.  Just begin reading.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1285">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text>It starts</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1286" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;PJS, John Reece, Sizwe Mbanda, C Motlana&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1287">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>At the top.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1288">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1289">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR KUNY</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1290" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1291">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>Yes.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1292">
			<speaker>MR MADLOPA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1293" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;Motlana&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1294">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The sentence actually says:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1295" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;also confirms&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1296">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>And &quot;also&quot; is not Motlana.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1297">
			<speaker>MR VALLY</speaker>
			<text>I think my learned friend is wrong, he should have looked at the second sentence</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1298" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1299">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1300">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1301" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1302">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>In other words, did you tell Bishop Storey on this occasion - did you repeat the information that Mrs Mandela refused to let you have access when you first visited her?  You seem somewhat confused Doctor Motlana.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1303">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>I told you that I never asked for access.  He keeps on repeating this question.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1304">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1305">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1306">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1307">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>You passed a remark which provoked him, he understood it when you said he looks confused.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1308">
			<speaker>MR KUNY</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1309">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1310">
			<speaker>MR SOLLER</speaker>
			<text>Doctor Motlana, Peter Soller on behalf of Sekile Mbatha.  Can I ask you one question - looking through an affidavit of Mrs Albertina Sisulu, I see that she says in the practice of Doctor Asvat what they did was it was a standard procedure to take fingerprints of male patients in Doctor Asvat practice.  Is that normally a standard procedure in any medical practice in your experience.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1311">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1312">
			<speaker>MR SOLLER</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1313">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, I do.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1314">
			<speaker>MR SOLLER</speaker>
			<text>Thank you doctor.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1315">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Any other?  Thank you.  My panel?  Doctor Faizel?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1316">
			<speaker>DR RANDERA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1317">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1318">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1319">
			<speaker>DR RANDERA</speaker>
			<text>So you never had any opportunity to discuss this with Mrs Madikizela Mandela herself as a friend?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1320">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>No, the only time I did it was when I was asked by Peter Storey to intervene on behalf of Paul Verryn.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1321">
			<speaker>DR RANDERA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1322">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1323">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1324">
			<speaker>DR RANDERA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1325">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>Yes, there was a meeting.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1326">
			<speaker>DR RANDERA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1327">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>Clearly Mr Chairman, I would have done that.  My answer to you Sir, is that as a concerned member of the community, as a friend of the family, as a medical attendant to the family, clearly those discussion would have a reason - clearly.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1328">
			<speaker>DR RANDERA</speaker>
			<text>But you still leave the house without those young people on that particular day and without even asking to see the young people.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1329">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1330">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1331">
			<speaker>DR RANDERA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1332">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> And I think I want to understand from you whether you actually took that concern with you and why it actually took almost 7 to 10 days before these young people were released.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1333">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>Then you must put those issues in context.  There was formed in Soweto as you very well know, the Crisis Committee and it was that Crisis Committee that sought to interact with Mrs Mandela, I was not part of that Crisis Committee.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1334">
			<speaker>MR MADLOPA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairperson, again it is not within the ...[indistinct] of my client to have ensured that the children were release immediately, he was not the so-called - or under a quotation mark &quot;the person who was actually restraining them&quot;, so the question is unfair in the first place to ask him as to why he did not ensure that the children were released.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1335">
			<speaker>DR RANDERA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1336" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>&quot;To intervene and attempt to have the said minors released&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1337">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1338">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> So you went there with the explicit intention of wanting to have these young people released.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1339">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>It just occurs to me Mr Chairman, that having had them released - to be fair and just, is the purpose of my visit.  I admit there was a time delay of 10 days, is it that important?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1340">
			<speaker>DR RANDERA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1341">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Thank you.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1342">
			<speaker>DR RANDERA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1343">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Hlengiwe?  No?  Dumisa?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1344">
			<speaker>MR NTSEBEZA</speaker>
			<text>Thank you Mr Chair.  Doctor Motlana, just for the record, the only way I think in which you refer to those minors as children is when you attributed the word to your wife on page three of your statement.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1345">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> Now, there was a reply that you gave that was very interesting and that was you said: &quot;Perhaps I was just happy to have taken the three away that I found&quot;.  Now, when you went to intervene, were you aware that there was a person by the name of Stompie who had also allegedly been taken away from the Methodist Manse?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1346">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>I must have been aware Mr Chairman, it was common knowledge, it had been spoken about, reported about, so I must have been aware.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1347">
			<speaker>MR NTSEBEZA</speaker>
			<text>And subsequent to your discussions with Bishop as to whether there was one or two or three, were you aware that also central to the concerns expressed was the fact that there was fear that the extent of the assault that were alleged to have taken place on the youths at the house, may have cost - certainly Stompie, his life or was that never discussed in those sort of terms even as a concern?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1348">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>No, it was not discussed in those terms.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1349">
			<speaker>MR NTSEBEZA</speaker>
			<text>But was it your impression when you went there that amongst the other minors - children - young people, Stompie was one of those whose release ought to have been secured?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1350">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1351">
			<speaker>MR NTSEBEZA</speaker>
			<text>And did you become aware when you personally drove them to the office of Mr Naidoo that Stompie was not amongst those?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1352">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>I was aware Mr Chairman, that Stompie was not ...[inaudible]</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1353">
			<speaker>MR NTSEBEZA</speaker>
			<text>And can you tell us how you felt - if you felt anything, knowing that one of the persons whose release you had to secure was Stompie and now you were going away from that house without him?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1354">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1355">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>Chairperson?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1356">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text>Yes?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1357">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>May I - arising out of this, just deal with two issues with the doctor, I propose not to be long.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1358">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> Doctor, just for linguistic correctness - I hear these words are being used very loosely, did you have a negotiation as we had it with our democratisation with Mrs Mandela or you had a discussion about these children to be for now released?  Was it a negotiation or was it a discussion that the children should be released for this purpose?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1359">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1360">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1361">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1362">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1363">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1364">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1365">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>No, there were no high walls.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1366">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>There were gates with locks and what have you and chains around them?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1367">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>No, there were no chains around.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1368">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>Now, using the ability of these young men, would they have walked if they had chosen to at the Diepkloof house - just given the physical description of the premises?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1369">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text>Mr Chairman, the gates to the Mandela residence ...[indistinct] nonsense - concrete wall, that also ...[indistinct] no but the entrance is freely accessible.  I think much, much later the security did improve I think after maybe Mrs Mandela had been threatened or something, the security did improve but at those times in 88/89, you could walk in and out.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1370">
			<speaker>MR SEMENYA</speaker>
			<text>I have no further questions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1371">
			<speaker>CHAIRPERSON</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1372">
			<speaker>MS SOOKA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1373">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> Now, there had been a consultation between you and these church leaders where I think the circumstances had been explained to you about the position these boys were being held in and I assume that when you went in there, you went in with that kind of knowledge.  Now why -given the fact that you knew there was this boy Stompie as well, were you unable to raise the questions of where this missing boy was - Stompie Seipei ?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1374">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1375">
			<speaker>MS SOOKA</speaker>
			<text>Why?</text>
		</line>
		<line number="1376">
			<speaker>MR MOTLANA</speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="1377">
			<speaker>MS SOOKA</speaker>
			<text>You see the one question that I think my learned colleague over there has raised, is that it was possible for these boys to walk from the house and we given this image of the house with possibly wall etc., and so I think the question that one</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>